University of Nebraska - Lincoln

DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

November 2020

Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm Applications in the Field

of Wireless Sensor Networks
Anupkumar M. Bongale Dr.
Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), [email protected]

Rahul Raghvendra Joshi Prof.

Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), [email protected]

Kalyani Dhananjay Kadam Prof.

Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac

Part of the Digital Communications and Networking Commons, and the Library and Information
Science Commons

Bongale, Anupkumar M. Dr.; Joshi, Rahul Raghvendra Prof.; and Kadam, Kalyani Dhananjay Prof.,
"Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm Applications in the Field of Wireless Sensor Networks" (2020).
Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 4567.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4567
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm
Applications in the Field of Wireless Sensor
Networks

Anupkumar M Bongale1 , Rahul Joshi2 and Kalyani Kadam3

1
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Symbiosis Institute
of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune,
Maharashtra, India
[email protected]
2
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Symbiosis Institute
of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune,
Maharashtra, India
[email protected]
3
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Symbiosis Institute
of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune,
Maharashtra, India
[email protected]

Abstract. Wireless Sensor Network is a network of wireless sensor nodes

that are capable of sensing information from their surroundings and
transmit the sensed information to data collection point known as a
base station. Applications of wireless sensor networks are large in num-
ber and forest fire detection, landslide monitoring, etc. are few appli-
cations to note. The research challenges in wireless sensor networks is
the transmission of data from the sensor node to the base station in
an energy-efficient manner and network life prolongation. Cluster-based
routing techniques are extensively adopted to address this research chal-
lenge. Researchers have used different metaheuristic and soft computing
techniques for designing such energy-efficient routing techniques. In the
literature, a lot of survey article on cluster-based routing methods are
available, but there is no bibliometric analysis conducted so far. Hence
in this research article, bibliometric study with the focus on the firefly
algorithm and its applications in wireless sensor network is undertaken.
The purpose of this article is to explore the nature of research conducted
2 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

concerning to authors, the connection between keywords, the importance

of journals and scope for further research in soft computing based clus-
tered routing methods. A detailed bibliometric analysis is carried out by
collecting the details of published articles from the Scopus database. In
this article, the collected data is articulated in terms of yearly document
statistics, key affiliations of authors, contributing geographical locations,
subject area statistics, author-keyword mapping, and many more essen-
tial aspects of bibliometric analysis. The conducted study helped in un-
derstanding that there is a vast scope for the research community to
perform research work concerning firefly algorithm applications in the
field of wireless sensor networks.

Keywords: Bibliometric Analysis · Cluster Head · Wireless Sensor Net-

work · Routing Protocol · Energy Efficiency.

1 Introduction

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is one of the famous and vast research top-
ics that has attracted a lot of researchers in the field of computer engineering,
electronics, telecommunications and mechanical engineering. WSN is a network
of wireless sensor nodes where the role of sensor nodes is to sense the physical
parameters (examples like temperature, pollution contents in air, water quality
parameters such as pH, etc.). The purpose of the sensors and their capability
largely depends upon the application type of WSN. Irrespective of the WSN
applications, the general operating principle is that there can be several wireless
sensor nodes spread across a sensing region. These sensors will sense some physi-
cal parameters and transmit sensed information to data collection point know as
Base Station (BS). Based on the data collected at BS, meaningful insights can
be obtained, or necessary action can be taken to address the needs at sensing
region. Since nodes operate wirelessly, a battery needs to be attached on each
node for data reception and transmission among the deployed sensors. In critical
applications of WSN such as remote health monitoring, volcanic eruption moni-
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 3

toring, landslide monitoring, etc. if the battery of sensor nodes dies, it is assumed
that associated node is also dead and replacement of the battery is not an op-
tion. Hence, most of the research work carried out so far revolves around energy
efficiency and network life prolongation. Energy efficiency is vital for all applica-
tions of WSNs, and it can be achieved with prudent WSN design techniques at
different layers such as physical layer, data link layer, network layer, transport
layer [47]. In particular, study related to cluster-based energy-efficient routing
methods have been extensively conducted among the WSN research community,
and some of the notable survey articles are [19, 28].

Typically, in a cluster-based routing scheme, nodes are categorised as cluster

head (CH) nodes and normal nodes (NN). The job of CH is to form a cluster
with few NN and collect the data from NN for further transmitting it to BS.
Such many CHs are to be elected for data gathering and transmission. As the
CHs consume larger energy, the role of CH is shifted to other NNs and hence
after some time or based on some conditions, new CHs are to be elected. In the
field of computer science, it is proved that CH election for WSNs as NP-Hard
problem. Hence a lot of research work is done keeping this as a research prob-
lem. Several notable survey articles are also published on the mentioned research
problem [1, 23, 43]. Specifically related to energy conservation and network life
prolongation, there are lot many routing protocols [1, 14, 19, 23, 32, 37, 43, 49].
Few of the most cited routing methods are LEACH [17], TEEN [25], LEACH-
centralized (LEACH-C) [16], PEGASIS [22] and HEED [45]. Also over the pe-
riod, researchers focused their work on utilising soft computing based techniques
such as Firefly Algorithm (FA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Fuzzy
logic, Artificial Bee Colony Optimization (ABC), Genetic Algorithm (GA), etc.
for designing energy-efficient routing techniques. [13,14,33,35,49] are some of the
published survey articles that are based on the above mentioned soft computing
and optimisation techniques.

With the study and brief overview of WSNs and the importance of soft com-
puting techniques in cluster-based routing techniques, it is apparent that WSN
4 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

is extensively studied and a lot of survey articles are available. But none of these
survey article highlight bibliometric analysis of WSNs and routing protocols.
Hence, this article is all about fulfilling such a need for bibliometric research
for the domain of WSNs. In this article, bibliometric review of a specific type
of nature-inspired optimisation technique, namely the Firefly Algorithm and its
applications in the field of WSNs is explored. The reason for writing this article
is to understand the correlation of different research work carried out so far in
the usage of FA for WSNs contribution of authors, scope and growth of the topic,
co-author analysis, network visualisations, etc.
The rest of the article is arranged as follows. Section 2 describes the pre-
liminary data and keyword string used in the Scopus database search engine.
Bibliometric information is described in section 3. Network diagrams are created
and explained in section 4. Section 5 is about research implications observed in
this article. Finally, the article is concluded in section 6.

2 Preliminary Data

This research is carried by querying to Scopus database. The query is made up

of components shown in table 1. The references used for formulation of section
2 and 3 are listed at the end of this paper [2–12, 15, 18, 20, 21, 24, 26, 27, 29–31,
34, 36, 38–40, 42, 44, 46, 48].

Table 1. Keywords used for querying to Scopus DB (Source: Scopus DB accessed on

6th November 2020)

Primary Keywords Wireless Sensor Network

Supporting Keywords Firefly AND Cluster Head AND Energy Efficiency OR WSN

Using the query string mentioned in table 1, 34 documents are obtained from
Scopus DB. All the articles collected from the query string are composed using
the English language, as mentioned in table 2.
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 5

Table 2. Publication language details (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November

2020)

Publication Language Count

English 34

3 Bibliometric Information

Bibliometric information presented in this section is articulated using the fol-

lowing details by analysing .csv file obtained through Scopus DB. The said in-
formation is as follows:

1. Publications by year, prominent authors, source statistics, subject area-

specific contribution, document type details, documents by source – yearly
details, affiliation statistics and details about funding sponsors
2. Second important aspect is to showcase the information using networked
diagrams based on authors, author keywords, source titles, reference scape,
Sankey graph showing tri-information like main authors, main keywords and
main journals, to name a few.

3.1 Preliminary Bibliometric Information

Fig. 1 shows yearly count of publications. There is a increase in the number of

publications for the span from 2017 to 2020. Prior to these years, there was no
such a increase observed. So, in a way the consider research area is getting boom
since last 3 years.
Fig. 2 shows prominent authors involved in the considered research area.
First five authors have two Scopus documents on their name. Remaining are
having only one document on their account. This eventually indicated scope of
the considered research area.
It is also essential to observe what are the vital source titles where these
publications were published. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and
Control Systems, International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems,
6 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

Fig. 1. Yearly publication count (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

Fig. 2. Prominent authors (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 7

Fig. 3. Yearly document statistics (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

Adhoc Networks, ACM International Conference proceeding series and Wireless

Personal Communications are the prominent source titles.
As per fig. 3 it can be observed that from the year 2017 to 2020, one paper
is published every year in the International Journal of Intelligent Engineering
and Systems. It is also indicated from the fig. 3 one article is also published in
the JARDCS in the year 2019.

Fig. 4. Key affiliations (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

8 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

Fig. 5. Key contributing countries (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

From fig. 4 it is evident that the majority of the key affiliations are from India.
Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore and Anna University are the leading ones
having three papers against their affiliations. Others have only two documents.
It is clear from fig. 5 that India is leading the said research followed by Iran
then Brazil. Out of 34 publications, 25 publications are from India.
Fig. 6 shows the majority of the documents are of article type followed by
conference papers. Significantly less contribution in terms of review papers. So,
there is a scope of review papers.
The maximum contributing area is computer science followed by engineering
as shown in fig. 7. There are other areas too like biochemistry, decision science,
energy, environmental science, mathematics, material science, medicine, phar-
macology etc.
From the fig. 8 it is clear that only two funding agencies sponsored the
research work and they are from Australia mainly. No funding supports for
research work emanated from Indian origin. The reason for this could be due to
the nature of research work conducted i.e., research is mainly simulation-based.
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 9

Fig. 6. Document type statistics (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

Fig. 7. Subject area statistics (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

Hence, for Indian researchers, there is a scope for extending their research work
to address the societal problems and approach for financial support from funding
agencies.
10 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

Fig. 8. Funding Sponsors (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

4 Networked Diagrams for Bibliometric Information

Fig. 9 denotes a networked diagram with emphasis on authors with their key-
words, related co-appearance. Firefly algorithm, clustering, cluster head, en-
ergy efficiency are the main keywords found in the articles. Akbari R, Hamid
A.A.A.A., Zivkovic M., Bezdan T. are the co-appearing authors for considered
keywords. There is a scope for consideration of other keywords too viz. mobile
sink, cluster head selection, energy consumption, chicken swarm optimisation
and shuffled frog-leaping algorithm etc.
Fig. 2 and fig. 10 clearly indicate authors viz. Bongale A. M., Kumar R.,
Sarkar A. etc. are the key authors and Journal of Circuits, Systems and Com-
puters, International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2020
(IWCMC 2020), International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems
etc. are the prominent source titles.
Source titles, author keywords and their co-appearance in the same papers
is shown in fig. 11. In addition to author keywords mentioned for fig. 9 few
additional important keywords here are ad hoc networks, open shortest path
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 11

Fig. 9. Authors, author keywords and co-appearing in the same paper (Source: Scopus
DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

Fig. 10. Authors, source titles and co-appearing in the same paper (Source: Scopus
DB accessed on 6th November 2020)
12 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

first routing protocol etc. Source titles that need to be considered are Journal
of Critical Reviews, International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing,
International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration and
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research etc. Networked diagram
in fig. 11 in a way clarifies about relationship between journal titles and keywords
used by authors

Fig. 11. Source titles, author keywords and co-appearing in the same papers (Source:
Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

This is a disconnected networked diagram. 29 papers are shown in this dia-

gram who are having DOI. Their titles are clearly visible from fig. 13.

Fig. 12 throws light on authors linked through their co-publication. Near

about 20 to 22 small clusters are denoting the same. Initially, prominent authors
are discussed in this paper. This networked diagram is the next level information
related to authors through their collaborative publications. From this networked
diagram, author names are visible who did co-publications.

Author keywords co-appearance is shown in fig. 14. Tree, forests, slot allo-
cation, leach-c algorithm, sensor node, adaptive search and firefly with nearest
neighbour chain clustering are the co-appearing keywords.
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 13

Fig. 12. Authors linked by co-publication (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th Novem-
ber 2020)

Fig. 13. Papers linked by citation when they have DOI (Source: Scopus DB accessed
on 6th November 2020)
14 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

Fig. 14. Author keywords co-appearing in the same papers (Source: Scopus DB ac-
cessed on 6th November 2020)

Fig. 15. Reference-scape (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 15

Fig. 16. Sankey Graph – Main Authors, main keywords, and main journals (Source:
Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

Fig. 17. Tabular Information of Sankey Graph in Fig. 15 (Source: Scopus DB accessed
on 6th November 2020)
16 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

Fig. 18. Journals over the time (Source: Scopus DB accessed on 6th November 2020)

Reference-scape showed in fig. 15 highlights some of the crucial references.

This figure is useful for the researchers who want to contribute in the area of
firefly algorithm applications for wireless sensor networks as they can be the
most valuable references for the formulating their research articles.
Fig. 16, 17 and 18 are related to each other. They show linked tri-information
viz. main authors, main keywords, and main journals. These figures are in a
way consolidation of preliminary data, and subsequent information discussed
through networked diagrams. Fig. 16 is a Sankey graph of the main authors,
main keywords, and main journals. Fig. 17 shows the same in tabular format
and fig. 18 shows journals over time.

5 Research Implications

There are only 34 publications available on the considered research topic, so

this is the research area which has a lot of scope for further research work.
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 17

India is a leading country, and only a few countable universities are involved
in this research, so other universities in India can also pay attention towards
this research area. Contribution in terms of review papers is significantly less.
No funding sponsors from India. Chicken swarm optimisation, chaotic firefly
algorithm, shuffled frog leaping algorithms are the emerging algorithms in this
area. Contribution by key authors is only two papers, so there is a scope for new
authors too. 2K7 – 2K20 are the influential years which show linear progression
in the paper’s count. The formulation of this first-ever bibliometric paper on this
research topic will highlight information about attentive keywords, less focused
keywords, co-appearance in terms of authors, author keywords and source titles
which can be beneficial information for the new researchers. Reference-scape is
also throwing light on essential references to paid attention.

6 Conclusion

In this article, a detailed bibliometric study on applications of firefly algorithm

in wireless sensor networks is conducted. All the necessary data is collected from
the Scopus database search engine. It became possible to identify the authors
associated with the studied topic, keywords, and journals liked to the subject of
Firefly Algorithm with respect to wireless sensor networks. Though the firefly
algorithm is suitable for solving optimisation problems of various disciplines like
biochemistry, material science, decision science, etc., nearly 46% of the work is
related to the field of computer science. Almost 73% of published work is from
journal articles. Scopus database suggested only 34 articles on the topic of firefly
algorithm for wireless sensor network, which is an excellent indication for the
researchers to research the studied area further.

References

1. I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci. Wireless sensor

networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 38(4):393 – 422, 2002.
18 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

2. Turki Ali Alghamdi. Energy efficient protocol in wireless sensor network: optimized
cluster head selection model. Telecommunication Systems, pages 1–15, 2020.

3. Shokat Ali and Rakesh Kumar. Artificial intelligence based energy efficient grid pe-
gasis routing protocol in wsn. In 2018 7th International Conference on Reliability,
Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions)(ICRITO),
pages 1–7. IEEE, 2018.

4. S Anbuchelian, S Lokesh, and Madhusudhanan Baskaran. Improving security in

wireless sensor network using trust and metaheuristic algorithms. In 2016 3rd In-
ternational Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS), pages
233–241. IEEE, 2016.

5. Amirhossein Barzin, Ahmad Sadegheih, Hassan Khademi Zare, and Mahbooeh

Honarvar. A hybrid swarm intelligence algorithm for clustering-based rout-
ing in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers,
29(10):2050163, 2020.

6. Madhusudhanan Baskaran and Chitra Sadagopan. Synchronous firefly algorithm

for cluster head selection in wsn. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 2015.

7. Shachi Battar and Rakesh Kumar. A hybrid approach to increase network lifetime
in wsn using pso and firefly optimization. In 2019 IEEE International Conference
on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT), pages 1–7.
IEEE, 2019.

8. Anupkumar M Bongale and CR Nirmala. Firefly algorithm inspired energy aware

clustering protocol for wireless sensor network. International Journal of Commu-
nication Networks and Distributed Systems, 23(3):380–411, 2019.

9. Anupkumar M Bongale, CR Nirmala, and Arunkumar M Bongale. Hybrid cluster

head election for wsn based on firefly and harmony search algorithms. Wireless
Personal Communications, 106(2):275–306, 2019.

10. Vinith Chauhan and Surender Soni. Mobile sink-based energy efficient cluster head
selection strategy for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and
Humanized Computing, pages 1–14, 2019.

11. Ravuri Daniel and Kuda Nageswara Rao. Eec-fm: Energy efficient clustering based
on firefly and midpoint algorithms in wireless sensor network. TIIS, 12(8):3683–
3703, 2018.
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 19

12. Fernando Gielow, Gentian Jakllari, Michele Nogueira, and Aldri Santos. Data
similarity aware dynamic node clustering in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc
Networks, 24:29–45, 2015.
13. T. Gui, C. Ma, F. Wang, and D. E. Wilkins. Survey on swarm intelligence
based routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: An extensive study. In 2016
IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), pages 1944–1949,
March 2016.
14. W. Guo and W. Zhang. A survey on intelligent routing protocols in wireless sensor
networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 38(Supplement C):185
– 201, 2014.
15. R Harikrishnan, V Jawahar Senthil Kumar, and P Sridevi Ponmalar. Firefly algo-
rithm approach for localization in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of 3rd
International Conference on Advanced Computing, Networking and Informatics,
pages 209–214. Springer, 2016.
16. W. B. Heinzelman, A. P. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan. An application-
specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions
on Wireless Communications, 1(4):660–670, Oct 2002.
17. W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan. Energy-efficient com-
munication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd
Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 10 pp. vol.2–,
Jan 2000.
18. Salem Abdulla Awadh Ba Hmaid and Vasanthi Varadharajan. Multipath data
transmission in iot networks using fractional firefly algorithm and chicken swarm
optimization.
19. Akkaya Kemal and Mohamed Younis. A survey on routing protocols for wireless
sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3):325 – 349, 2005.
20. Mukesh Kumar, Sudhir Narayan Singh, and Nishant Mehta. A comparative review
on different power saving techniques in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of
the 2014 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology
for Competitive Strategies, pages 1–5, 2014.
21. Praveen Lalwani, Isha Ganguli, and Haider Banka. Farw: Firefly algorithm for
routing in wireless sensor networks. In 2016 3rd international conference on recent
advances in information technology (RAIT), pages 248–252. IEEE, 2016.
20 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

22. S. Lindsey and C. S. Raghavendra. PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor

information systems. In Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference, volume 3, pages
3–1125–3–1130 vol.3, 2002.
23. J. J. Lotf, M. Hosseinzadeh, and R. M. Alguliev. Hierarchical routing in wireless
sensor networks: a survey. In 2010 2nd International Conference on Computer
Engineering and Technology, volume 3, pages V3–650–V3–654, April 2010.
24. V Manikandan, M Sivaram, Amin Salih Mohammed, and V Porkodi. Nature in-
spired improved firefly algorithm for node clustering in wsns. CMC-COMPUTERS
MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 64(2):753–776, 2020.
25. A. Manjeshwar and D. P. Agrawal. TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced effi-
ciency in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings 15th International Parallel and
Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2001, pages 2009–2015, April 2001.
26. Islam Mosavvar and Ali Ghaffari. Data aggregation in wireless sensor networks
using firefly algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 104(1):307–324, 2019.
27. T Senthil Murugan and Amit Sarkar. Optimal cluster head selection by hybridis-
ation of firefly and grey wolf optimisation. International Journal of Wireless and
Mobile Computing, 14(3):296–305, 2018.
28. N. A. Pantazis, S. A. Nikolidakis, and D. D. Vergados. Energy-Efficient Routing
Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys
Tutorials, 15(2):551–591, Second 2013.
29. B Pitchaimanickam and G Murugaboopathi. A hybrid firefly algorithm with parti-
cle swarm optimization for energy efficient optimal cluster head selection in wireless
sensor networks. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(12):7709–7723, 2020.
30. J Pradeep and Mummoorthy P Mahes Kumar. Distributed entropy energy-efficient
clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor network based chaotic firefly
algorithm cluster head selection. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8):1208–1215, 2020.
31. SKLV Sai Prakash and Kondapalli S Rami Reddy. Firefly inspired energy aware
cluster based tree formation in wsn. In 2014 2nd international conference on
information and communication technology (ICoICT), pages 356–360. IEEE, 2014.
32. T. Rault, A. Bouabdallah, and Y. Challal. Energy efficiency in wireless sensor
networks: A top-down survey. Computer Networks, 67:104 – 122, 2014.
33. M. Saleem, G. A. D. Caro, and M. Farooq. Swarm intelligence based routing
protocol for wireless sensor networks: Survey and future directions. Information
Sciences, 181(20):4597 – 4624, 2011. Special Issue on Interpretable Fuzzy Systems.
 Bibliometric Analysis of Firefly Algorithm for WSN 21

34. R Sandhya and N Sengottaiyan. Dynamic ch selection and intrusion detection

in wsn using reinforced weighted approximation based adaptive seech: An opti-
mized routing framework. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research,
12(20):9315–9326, 2017.
35. G. S. Sara and D. Sridharan. Routing in mobile wireless sensor network: a survey.
Telecommunication Systems, 57(1):51–79, Sep 2014.
36. Amit Sarkar and T Senthil Murugan. Cluster head selection for energy efficient and
delay-less routing in wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks, 25(1):303–320,
2019.
37. A. M. Shamsan Saleh, B. M. Ali, M. F. A. Rasid, and A. Ismail. A survey on energy
awareness mechanisms in routing protocols for wireless sensor networks using op-
timization methods. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies,
25(12):1184–1207, 2014.
38. Achyut Shankar and Natarajan Jaisankar. Security enabled cluster head selection
for wireless sensor network using improved firefly optimization. In International
conference on soft computing and pattern recognition, pages 176–192. Springer,
2016.
39. Achyut Shankar and Jaisankar Natarajan. Base station positioning in wireless
sensor network to aid cluster head selection process. International Journal of
Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 10(2):173–182, 2017.
40. T Shankar and S Shanmugavel. Hybrid approach for energy optimization in wireless
sensor networks using abc and firefly algorithms. Computers and Software, page
2335, 2013.
41. V. Sharma and A. Pughat. Energy-Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks. CRC Press,
Taylor and Francis Group, FL 33487-2742, August 2017.
42. Ramadhani Sinde, Shubi Kaijage, and Karoli Njau. Cluster based wireless sensor
network for forests environmental monitoring. International Journal of Advanced
Technology and Engineering Exploration, 7(63):36–47, 2020.
43. S. K. Singh, P. Kumar, and J. P. Singh. A Survey on Successors of LEACH
Protocol. IEEE Access, 5:4298–4328, 2017.
44. Vinu Sundararaj, Selvi Muthukumar, and RS Kumar. An optimal cluster formation
based energy efficient dynamic scheduling hybrid mac protocol for heavy traffic load
in wireless sensor networks. Computers & Security, 77:277–288, 2018.
22 Anupkumar M Bongale et al.

45. O. Younis and S. Fahmy. HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering

approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing,
3(4):366–379, Oct 2004.
46. Zeynab Molay Zahedi, Reza Akbari, Mohammad Shokouhifar, Farshad Safaei, and
Ali Jalali. Swarm intelligence based fuzzy routing protocol for clustered wireless
sensor networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 55:313–328, 2016.
47. J. Zheng and A. Jamalipour. Wireless Sensor Networks: A Networking Perspective.
Wiley-IEEE Press, 2009.
48. Miodrag Zivkovic, Nebojsa Bacanin, Eva Tuba, Ivana Strumberger, Timea Bezdan,
and Milan Tuba. Wireless sensor networks life time optimization based on the
improved firefly algorithm. In 2020 International Wireless Communications and
Mobile Computing (IWCMC), pages 1176–1181. IEEE, 2020.
49. A. M. Zungeru, L. M. Ang, and K. P. Seng. Classical and swarm intelligence based
routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey and comparison. Journal
of Network and Computer Applications, 35(5):1508 – 1536, 2012. Service Delivery
Management in Broadband Networks.