481-Article Text-1692-3-10-20221128
481-Article Text-1692-3-10-20221128
481-Article Text-1692-3-10-20221128
Proceedings of
12th Structural Engineering Convention - An International Event (SEC 2022)
Available at https://asps-journals.com/index.php/acp
Paper ID - 010511
Abstract
Steel concrete composite construction is now gaining popularity in our country. Concrete-encased
Concrete steel columns
have several advantages, but like RC columns, there is a need to ensure adequate concrete confinement so that it
has sufficient ductility under seismic loads. This study investigates the confinement of the concrete based on the
detailing of the transverse reinforcement. The ductilities of a typical encased section that satisfies the minimum
reinforcement criteria and a highly confined sectionwith special detailing are compared. A nonlinear 3D finite
element model is developed in ABAQUS for this purpose. The confined stress-strain strain curve for M30 grade of
concrete is carefully incorporated in the special confined section. The interaction between structural steel and
concrete is modelled with an 'embedded
embedded region
region' interaction tool available in the ABAQUS library. Based on the
eigen mode of the section, theiinitial geometric imperfection wasgiven. The significant increment in
displacement ductility factor, plastic hinge rotation and drift ratio are observed for a special confined encased
column. A parametric study has been carried out by varying the parameter parameters;; the axial load ratio, steel
contribution ratio, steel width to depth ratio and transverse reinforcement spacing. It was observed thatstructural
that
section aspect ratio (steel width to depth) and transverse reinforcement spacing significantly affect the ductility
of the section. The
he plastic hinge rotation and drift ratio
ratioss were also calculated for different sections.
Keywords: Encased composite columns
columns; confinement of concrete; Ductility;Finite element analysis; Axial load
ratio.
cover concrete
(CDP) model is used for the plastic behaviour of concrete.
fire
concrete
concrete Different mess size is tried for convergence issues and less
highly
confined
splitting computational time. A reasonable mess size of 20 mm for
concrete
concrete and steel and 5 mm for reinforcing bars provides
satisfactory results and less computational time.Fe345 grade
of structural steel with an elastic modulus of 210 GPa and
Poisson's ratio equal to 0.2 is provided in this analysis. The
Cross-section Probable path of Spalling of nonlinear part of the stress-strain curve is modelled as a
Splitting concrete plastic option available in ABAQUS.
Fig. 3. Cross-section of the composite section with
confinement and cracking path 3.2 Modelling of confined concrete
The spalling force on the cross-section of 𝑓 Based on Mander's rational equation, the stress-strain curves
the section is developed due to vertical are plotted for confined and unconfined concrete and used
pressure: 𝑓 = 𝜇𝜎𝑙𝑠 Where 𝜇 and s are the 𝑙
𝑓 for this analysis. Fig. 4 shows the uniaxial strain-stress curve
poison's ratio of the concrete and spacing of 𝑓 for concrete in compression. The unconfined stress-strain
transverse reinforcement, respectively. The 𝑙 curve for M30 grade of concrete is used in this study, in
force resisted by transverse reinforcement is Free body which ultimate strain (εcu) is taken as twice of ε0 (ε0=0.002).
𝑓 = 𝑓 𝐴 . The relationship between clear The confined concrete compressive strength (fcc) and
diagram ultimate confined strain (εcu) are used as proposed by
length (l) and spacing (s) is calculated based
on the criteria (𝑓 < 𝑓 ). Mander et al. [12]. The unconfined concrete is used for the
typical confined section without a cross tie, while confined
concrete is used in the core of the special confined section,
as shown in fig. 1(c) can delay partially confined concrete's
as shown in fig.1 (c). The concrete near web-flange joints is
crushing and provide better ductility. This study focused on
highly confined and modelled separately. For a typical
how much an increase in displacement ductility, plastic
section without a cross tie, an unconfined stress-strain curve
hinge rotation and drift ratio could be achieved by providing
is used throughout the cross section as the concrete is
a cross-tie. The concrete section is highly stressed due to the
partially confined.
high load ratio and forces required by the transverse
reinforcement to maintain the bursting pressure.Two types The plastic behaviour of the concrete is modelled with a
of confinement exist in the encased composite columns: (1) concrete damage parameter available in ABAQUS material
Stirrup induced confinement, which considers the stirrup library. The dilation angle φ = 300, flow potential
volumetric ratio and spacing of transverse bar; (2) Structural eccentricity ε = 0.1, fb0/fc0=1.16, K= 0.667 and viscosity
steel induced confinement, which covers the high parameter μ= 0 is used in this study [17]. The modelling of
confinement zone as shown in fig. 3 (a). the special confined concrete is done separately and
assembled with the model. The 'embedded region'interaction
The potential buckling mode and the corresponding
is used,in which the unconfined and confined concrete is
buckling length of longitudinal bars depend on the
assigned as a host region for embedded steel and
geometrical and mechanical properties of both longitudinal
reinforcement. The modelling of confined and unconfined
and transverse reinforcement. Dhakal and Su (2018)[13]
concrete is shown in fig. 5.
proposed a design recommendation to ensure the
satisfactory buckling restraint of lateral ties. Lateral ties 1.1 Modelling of interface and initial geometric
delay the buckling-induced instability until the desired level imperfection
of ductility is achieved. The tie stiffness ktis used to define The interaction of the steel, reinforcement and concrete parts
the buckling of main bars between two consecutive ties is modelled using embedded elements available in
derived from the energy-based approach. ABAQUS library. The reinforcement and steel section is
treated as an embedded region, while concrete behaves as a
3. FEM Modelling host region.
3.1 Modelling approach 45
Confined concrete
The parts of the encased composite column are modelled 40
Unconfined Concrete
and assembled in finite element-based software (ABAQUS). 35
Three types of effectively confined areasare considered for 30
the encased column:unconfined, partially confined, and
Compressive Stress (fc)
25
highly confined concrete, as shown in fig.3(a). Chen and Lin
20
[1] defined confining factor for partial and highly confined
concrete by varying the shape of structural steel and 15
linear 3-D truss element (T3D2) for reinforcing bar and Fig.4. Stress-strain curve for confined and
stirrups[15,16] is used. The concrete damage plasticity unconfined concrete in compression
113
Mishra and Kumar / ASPS Conference Proceedings 1: 111-119 (2022)
5000 5000
4000 4000
3000
3000
2000
2000
1000
Exp. result 1000 Exp. result
FEM (Present study)
0 FEM (Present study)
0 2 4 6 8 0
Vertical Displacement (mm) 0 5 10 15
Lateral Deflection (mm)
Fig. 6. Comparison of load-displacement response between
Fig. 7. Moment curvature of the sections at zero axial load
114
Mishra and Kumar / ASPS Conference Proceedings 1: 111-119 (2022)
As mentioned
tioned earlier, the increase in the area of transverse
reinforcement and reduction in spacing provides more
confinement to the column. The primary concern of the
(a) bulging of concrete (b) stress contour at failure composite column is the detailing of transverse bar; a large
ductility can be achieved by providing special detailing of
transverse bars at close spacing. Fig. 3(a) showsthat the
effective confinement area can exhibit large ductility while
the column failure is due to the crushingof partially confined
concrete. In this study, the effect of special detailing
detailin is
investigated. The effectiveconfined area can be increased by
providing an additional cross-tie
cross bar, as shown in fig 1(c).
For highly ductile members,
member AISC provides a complex
detailing of transverse reinforcement with shear connectors
to prevent the slippage of concrete on steel flanges.
flanges As per
(c) Development of plastic strain the Indian code for composite construction, IS 11384, the
shear transfer between concrete and steel is ensured through
Fig. 8. Failure mode and stress distribution of the model
bonds up to shear stresses of 0.3 N/mm2;mechanical shear
3.2 Deformation capacity connectors should be provided beyond these stresses.
stresses The
shear connectors complicate the section,
section and welding the
The inelastic deformation capacity is measured with the shear connector is a tedious job. A similar section provided
member'ss displacement ductility, plastic hinge rotation and by AISC is used without steel anchors in this study and
drift ratio capacity. The displacement ductility factor
factor(𝜇 ) is compared with the typical encased composite column.column The
the primary representation of the deformation capacity of effective fully confining stress is achieved by giving the
the member. The displacement ductility factor is defined as cross-tie. The confinement detailing of the special detailed
the ratio of ultimate displacement (𝛥 ) to yield displacement encased composite section on is shown in fig.10.
fig
(𝛥 ).
The stress-strain
strain curve for unconfined and confined concrete
𝛥 was explained in modelling section 3.2. The post-peak
𝜇 =
𝛥 strength reduction is remarkably less after providing a cross
tie, as shown in fig.11.. The displacement ductility, plastic
pla
The ultimate displacement corresponds to the residual lateral hinge rotations andnd drift ratios for a regular and special
force carrying capacity that has declined to 0.85Hmax;the detailed column are summarised in Table 1.
yield displacement is defined as the displacement
corresponding to the secant slope at 0.75 Hmax,as shown in
fig.9.
Confined
concrete
The plastic hinge rotation(𝜃 ) is defined as the ratio of
difference of ultimate and yield displacemeent to the length
of the member.
115
Mishra and Kumar / ASPS Conference Proceedings 1: 111-119 (2022)
116
Mishra and Kumar / ASPS Conference Proceedings 1: 111-119 (2022)
Table 2. Ductility for different steel contribution ratios Table 3. Effect of member width to depth ratio
Steel section 𝝁𝜟 𝜽𝒑 αu
Dimensions Structural steel δ 𝝁𝜟 𝜽𝒑 α u
S-00 3.53 0.034 4.7
COM 400×600 WPB 220×40.40 0.43 3.68 0.024 3.2
S-20 3.11 0.025 3.7
COM 400×600 WPB 240×47.39 0.48 3.63 0.023 3.2
S-40 3.08 0.021 3.1
COM 400×600 WPB 200×50.92 0.50 3.11 0.02 3.0 S-60 2.94 0.018 2.7
COM 400×600 WPB 240×60.32 0.55 3.14 0.02 3.0 S-80 2.88 0.016 2.4
COM 400×600 WPB 250×67.21 0.58 3.08 0.021 3.1 SD-00 6.56 0.064 7.5
NPB SD-20 4.76 0.037 4.7
COM 400×600 0.64 3.59 0.025 3.4
350×250×79.1 SD-40 3.86 0.025 3.4
SD-60 3.57 0.021 3.0
SD-80 3.02 0.017 2.5
Fig. 14. Load displacement response for Fig. 15. Load displacement response for regular and deep
different steel contributions at ρaxial=0.4 section
The result shows the expected behaviour that by providing a 250×250×67.21), SD represents the deep section (NPB
higher steel contribution ratio, the stiffness and strength of 350×250×79.1), and the later part of the ID represents the
the composite column increase, as shown in fig. 14. percentage of axial load ratio on the column.
By increasing the steel contribution ratio from 0.43 to 0.64, Fig. 15 shows a significant increase in displacement
the displacement ductility, plastic hinge rotations and drift ductility for deep sections. The changes are more prominent
ratios arenot changing much. Table 2 shows that the for the lower axial load ratio, whilemore than three
displacement ductility decreases with increasing steel displacement ductility is observed for the deep section at
contribution ratio except for NPB 350×250×79.1. As higher axial load ratios. The increment of plastic hinge
stiffness and strength increase, drift ratio and plastic hinge rotation and drift ratio is up to 88% and 59% for regular and
rotation do not vary much by changing the steel contribution deep sections, respectively.In comparison, the steel
ratio. Section 7.3 shows that the steel section flange width to contribution ratio for NPB 350×250×79.1 is only 10.3%
section depth ratio comes across as the more significant higher than WPB 250×250×67.21.
governing criteria for ductile designing rather than the steel
contribution ratio. 5.4 Effect of transverse reinforcement spacing
5.3 Effect of section width to depth ratio The stirrup ratio increases the ductility by increasing the
core confined concrete area [7]. Closely spaced tie bars
The effect of structural steel width to depth ratio is increase the core confined area, resulting ina higher strain
investigated in this study. Two structural steel WPB capacity of the concrete. The effect of transverse
250×67.21 and NPB 350×250×79.1 sectionswith width to reinforcement is evaluated for different axial load ratios.
depth ratios of 1.02 and 0.73 are used to form the regular This study evaluates an encased column with 100 mm and
and deep encased sections, respectively. IS 11384 does not 50 mm tie bar spacing. The displacement ductility, plastic
specify the limiting flange slenderness of the steel for the hinge rotations and drift ratios are investigated for different
composite column. The flange slenderness of regular and axial load ratios and summarised in table 4.
deep steel sections is 11.35 and 8.93, respectively, satisfying
the criteria for semi-compact and compact sections. The As shown in Table 4, the displacement ductility, plastic
displacement ductility, plastic hinge rotations and drift ratios hinge rotations and drift ratios increaseby 42%, 56% and
are calculated for different axial load ratios and 43% for zero axial load ratio,respectively. The 50 mm
summarisedin table 3. The sections are designated as S-20 spaced specimen shows a displacement ductility ratio of
and SD-20, where Srepresents the regular composite column more than three, even for a higher axial load ratio. For an
(WPB axial load ratio of more than 0.2, the plastic hinge rotation
barely shows an increase of less than 20%. The lateral load-
displacement curve for a higher axial load ratio (0.6 and
0.8)is plotted in Fig. 16.
117
Mishra and Kumar / ASPS Conference Proceedings 1: 111-119 (2022)
Table 4. Effect of transverse reinforcement section. Providing stirrups too close is practically
difficult and creates concrete pouring congestion.
congestion
Tie αu Here a spacing of 50 mm of transverse
ρaxial
spacing (%) reinforcement shows good ductility at an axial load
0 26.7 94.0 3.53 0.034 4.7 ratio of 0.6.
0.2 23.7 73.8 3.11 0.025 3.7
100
0.4 19.9 61.2 3.08 0.021 3.1
mm
0.6 18.4 54.1 2.94 0.018 2.7 Disclosures
0.8 16.9 48.8 2.88 0.016 2.4
0 26.7 133 4.99 0.053 6.7 Free Access to this article is sponsored by
0.2 23.7 81.4 3.43 0.029 4.1 SARL ALPHA CRISTO INDUSTRIAL.
50 mm 0.4 19.9 69.9 3.52 0.025 3.5
0.6 18.4 60.2 3.27 0.021 3.0
0.8 16.9 54.1 3.19 0.019 2.7
References
[1] Chen CC, Lin NJ. Analytical model for predicting axial capacity and
behavior of concrete encased steel composite stub columns. J Constr
Steel Res 2006;62:424–33.
33. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.04.021.
[2] Chen CC, Chen CC, Hoang TT. Role of concrete confinement of wide- wide
flange structural steel shape in steel reinforced
reinforce concrete columns under
cyclic loading. Eng Struct 2016;110:79
2016;110:79–87.
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.002.
This study uses a nonlinear 3D modelling of encased [6] Zhu W, Jia J, Gao J, Zhang F. Experimental study on steel reinforced
concrete composite columns. Concrete confinement is high-strength concrete columns
lumns under cyclic lateral force and constant
axial load. Eng Struct 2016;125:191
2016;125:191–204.
investigated by providing special detailing of the transverse doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.018.
reinforcement. The displacement ductility factor, plastic
hinge rotation and drift ratio are evaluated for different axial [7] Chen C, Wang C, Sun H. Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of
Full Encased Steel-Concrete
Concrete Composite Columns. J Struct Eng
load ratios.. The parametric study has been carried out by 2014;140:04014024.
4;140:04014024. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000951.
doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943
varying the
he axial load ratio, steel contribution ratio, steel
width to depth ratio and transverse reinforcement spacing
spacing. [8] Venkateshwaran A, Lai BL, Liew JYR. Buckling resistance of steel
This study finds the following outcomes for an encased fibre-reinforced
reinforced concrete encased steel composite columns. J Constr
Steel Res 2022;190:107140. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107140.
composite column.
[9] Lai B, Richard Liew JY, Wang T. Buckling behaviour of high strength
1. The special detailing of transverse reinfo
reinforcement concrete encased steel composite columns. J Constr Steel Res
enhances the ductility factors
actors significantly. The 2019;154:27–42.
42. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.11.023.
regular detailed encased composite column does [10] AISC 360-16.
16. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, an
not show good ductile behaviour for a higher axial American National
ional Standard. Am Inst Steel Constr Chicago 2016:612.
load ratio. Even for a high axial load ratio
(ρaxial>0.6), the displacement ductility comes out to [11] Chen CC, Chen CC, Shen JH. Effects of steel-to-member
steel depth
ratio and axial load on flexural ductility of concrete-encased
concrete steel
be>4, indicating the good deformability
rmability of the composite columns. Eng Struct 2018;155:157
2018;155:157–66.
special encased section. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.036.
uct.2017.11.036.
2. The deformation capacity is not too sensitive tothe
[12] Mander JB. MJNP, Park R. THEORETICAL STRESS-STRAIN
STRESS
steel contribution ratio, although the stiffness and MODEL FOR CONFINED CONCRETE. J Struct Eng
strength capacity increase. 1989;114:1804–26.
3. The steel width-to-depth ratio is a more governing
parameter for the seismic design ign of composite [13] Dhakal RP, Su J. Design of transverse reinforcement to avoid
premature buckling of main bars. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2018;47:147–
columns. A higher width-to-depth
depth ratio increases 68. doi:10.1002/eqe.2944.
deformation capacity up to 88% by confining more
concrete area. [14] Mirza SA, Skrabek BW. Statistical Analysis of Slender
Composite Beam‐Column
Column Strength. J Struct Eng 1992;118:1312–32.
1992;118:1312
4. The effect of spacing of transverse reinforcement is doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1312).
9445(1992)118:5(1312).
investigated;; about a 42% increment in
displacement ductility is observed for a 50 mm [15] Ellobody E, Young B. Numerical simulation of concrete
spaced stirrup section over a 100 mm spaced encased steel composite columns. J Constr Steel Res 2011;67:211–22.
2011;67:211
118
Mishra and Kumar / ASPS Conference Proceedings 1: 111-119 (2022)
119