#8 Get More Refcarz! Visit refcardz.

com

CONTENTS INCLUDE:
Chain of Responsibility

Design Patterns
n

n
Command
n
Interpreter
n
Iterator
n
Mediator
n
Observer By Jason McDonald
n
Template Method and more...

Example
ABOUT DESIGN PATTERNS Exception handling in some languages implements this pattern.
When an exception is thrown in a method the runtime checks to
This Design Patterns refcard provides a quick reference to see if the method has a mechanism to handle the exception or
the original 23 Gang of Four design patterns, as listed in the if it should be passed up the call stack. When passed up the call
book Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented stack the process repeats until code to handle the exception is
Software. Each pattern includes class diagrams, explanation, encountered or until there are no more parent objects to hand
usage information, and a real world example. the request to.

Creational Patterns: Used to construct objects such that

COMMAND Object Behavioral
they can be decoupled from their implementing system.
Structural Patterns: Used to form large object structures Client Invoker
between many disparate objects.
ConcreteCommand
Behavioral Patterns: Used to manage algorithms,
+execute( )
relationships, and responsibilities between objects.

Object Scope: Deals with object relationships that can be Command

Receiver +execute ( )
changed at runtime.
Class Scope: Deals with class relationships that can be changed Purpose
www.dzone.com

at compile time. Encapsulates a request allowing it to be treated as an object.

This allows the request to be handled in traditionally object
C Abstract Factory S Decorator C Prototype based relationships such as queuing and callbacks.
S Adapter S Facade S Proxy
Use When
S Bridge C Factory Method B Observer n
You need callback functionality.
C Builder S Flyweight C Singleton n
Requests need to be handled at variant times or in variant orders.
B Chain of B Interpreter B State n
A history of requests is needed.
Responsibility B Iterator B Strategy n
The invoker should be decoupled from the object handling the
B Command B Mediator B Template Method invocation.
S Composite B Memento B Visitor
Example
Job queues are widely used to facilitate the asynchronous
CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY Object Behavioral processing of algorithms. By utilizing the command pattern the
functionality to be executed can be given to a job queue for
successor processing without any need for the queue to have knowledge
of the actual implementation it is invoking. The command object
<<interface>> that is enqueued implements its particular algorithm within the
Client Handler confines of the interface the queue is expecting.
+handlerequest( )

ConcreteHandler 1 ConcreteHandler 2
+handlerequest( ) +handlerequest( )
Design Patterns

Purpose
Gives more than one object an opportunity to handle a request
by linking receiving objects together.
Use When
n
Multiple objects may handle a request and the handler
doesn’t have to be a specific object.
n
A set of objects should be able to handle a request with the
handler determined at runtime.
n
A request not being handled is an acceptable potential
outcome.

DZone, Inc. | www.dzone.com

 2
Design Patterns
tech facts at your fingertips

INTERPRETER Class Behavioral MEDIATOR Object Behavioral

Client informs
Mediator <<interface>>
Colleague
<<interface>>
Context AbstractExpression
+interpret( )

◆
TerminalExpression NonterminalExpression updates
ConcreteMediator ConcreteColleague
+interpret( ) : Context +interpret( ) : Context

Purpose
Purpose
Allows loose coupling by encapsulating the way disparate sets of
Defines a representation for a grammar as well as a mechanism
objects interact and communicate with each other. Allows for the
to understand and act upon the grammar.
actions of each object set to vary independently of one another.
Use When
Use When
n
There is grammar to interpret that can be represented as n
Communication between sets of objects is well defined
large syntax trees.
and complex.
n
The grammar is simple. n
Too many relationships exist and common point of control
n
Efficiency is not important.
or communication is needed.
n
Decoupling grammar from underlying expressions is desired.
Example
Example
Mailing list software keeps track of who is signed up to the
Text based adventures, wildly popular in the 1980’s, provide
mailing list and provides a single point of access through which
a good example of this. Many had simple commands, such
any one person can communicate with the entire list. Without
as “step down” that allowed traversal of the game. These
a mediator implementation a person wanting to send a mes-
commands could be nested such that it altered their meaning.
For example, “go in” would result in a different outcome than sage to the group would have to constantly keep track of who
“go up”. By creating a hierarchy of commands based upon was signed up and who was not. By implementing the mediator
the command and the qualifier (non-terminal and terminal pattern the system is able to receive messages from any point
expressions) the application could easily map many command then determine which recipients to forward the message on to,
variations to a relating tree of actions. without the sender of the message having to be concerned with
the actual recipient list.

ITERATOR Object Behavioral

MEMENTO Object Behavioral

Client

<<interface>> <<interface>> Memento

Aggregate Iterator Caretaker -state

+createIterator( ) +next( )

Concrete Aggregate ConcreteIterator

Originator
+createIterator( ) : Context +next ( ) : Context -state
+setMemento(in m : Memento)
Purpose +createMemento( )
Allows for access to the elements of an aggregate object
Purpose
without allowing access to its underlying representation.
Allows for capturing and externalizing an object’s internal
Use When state so that it can be restored later, all without violating
n
Access to elements is needed without access to the entire
encapsulation.
representation.
n
Multiple or concurrent traversals of the elements are needed. Use When
n
A uniform interface for traversal is needed. n
The internal state of an object must be saved and restored
n
Subtle differences exist between the implementation details at a later time.
of various iterators. n
Internal state cannot be exposed by interfaces without exposing
implementation.
Example
n
Encapsulation boundaries must be preserved.
The Java implementation of the iterator pattern allows users to
traverse various types of data sets without worrying about the Example
underlying implementation of the collection. Since clients simply Undo functionality can nicely be implemented using the
interact with the iterator interface, collections are left to define memento pattern. By serializing and deserializing the state of
the appropriate iterator for themselves. Some will allow full ac- an object before the change occurs we can preserve a snapshot
cess to the underlying data set while others may restrict certain of it that can later be restored should the user choose to undo
functionalities, such as removing items. the operation.

DZone, Inc. | www.dzone.com

 3
Design Patterns
tech facts at your fingertips

OBSERVER Object Behavioral STRATEGY Object Behavioral

<<interface>> Context

◆
Subject
notifies <<interface>>
+attach(in o : Observer) Observer <<interface>>
+detach(in o : Observer) Strategy
+notify( ) +update( )
+execute( )

ConcreteStrategyA ConcreteStrategyB
ConcreteSubject ConcreteObserver
observes +execute( ) +execute( )
-subjectState -observerState
+update ( )
Purpose
Purpose Defines a set of encapsulated algorithms that can be swapped
Lets one or more objects be notified of state changes in other to carry out a specific behavior.
objects within the system.
Use When
Use When n
The only difference between many related classes is their
n
State changes in one or more objects should trigger behavior
behavior.
in other objects n
Multiple versions or variations of an algorithm are required.
n
Broadcasting capabilities are required. n
Algorithms access or utilize data that calling code shouldn’t
n
An understanding exists that objects will be blind to the
be exposed to.
expense of notification. n
The behavior of a class should be defined at runtime.
Example n
Conditional statements are complex and hard to maintain.
This pattern can be found in almost every GUI environment.
Example
When buttons, text, and other fields are placed in applications
When importing data into a new system different validation
the application typically registers as a listener for those controls.
algorithms may be run based on the data set. By configuring the
When a user triggers an event, such as clicking a button, the
import to utilize strategies the conditional logic to determine
control iterates through its registered observers and sends a
notification to each. what validation set to run can be removed and the import can be
decoupled from the actual validation code. This will allow us to
dynamically call one or more strategies during the import.
STATE Object Behavioral

TEMPLATE METHOD Class Behavioral

Context
◆

+request ( )
<<interface>> AbstractClass
State +templateMethod( )
+handle( ) #subMethod( )

ConcreteClass
ConcreteState 1 ConcreteState 2 +subMethod( )
+handle ( ) +handle ( )
Purpose
Purpose Identifies the framework of an algorithm, allowing implementing
Ties object circumstances to its behavior, allowing the object classes to define the actual behavior.
to behave in different ways based upon its internal state.
Use When
Use When n
A single abstract implementation of an algorithm is needed.
n
The behavior of an object should be influenced by its state. n
Common behavior among subclasses should be localized to a
n
Complex conditions tie object behavior to its state. common class.
n
Transitions between states need to be explicit. n
Parent classes should be able to uniformly invoke behavior in
Example their subclasses.
An email object can have various states, all of which will n
Most or all subclasses need to implement the behavior.
change how the object handles different functions. If the state
Example
is “not sent” then the call to send() is going to send the message
A parent class, InstantMessage, will likely have all the methods
while a call to recallMessage() will either throw an error or do
nothing. However, if the state is “sent” then the call to send() required to handle sending a message. However, the actual
would either throw an error or do nothing while the call to serialization of the data to send may vary depending on the
recallMessage() would attempt to send a recall notification implementation. A video message and a plain text message
to recipients. To avoid conditional statements in most or all will require different algorithms in order to serialize the data
methods there would be multiple state objects that handle the correctly. Subclasses of InstantMessage can provide their
implementation with respect to their particular state. The calls own implementation of the serialization method, allowing the
within the Email object would then be delegated down to the parent class to work with them without understanding their
appropriate state object for handling. implementation details.

DZone, Inc. | www.dzone.com

 4
Design Patterns
tech facts at your fingertips

VISITOR Object Behavioral BRIDGE Object Structural

<<interface>> Abstraction

◆
Visitor Client
+operation( )
<<interface>>
+visitElementA(in a : ConcreteElementA)
Implementor
+visitElementB(in b : ConcreteElementB)
<<interface>>
+operationImp( )
Element
ConcreteVisitor +accept(in v : Visitor)
+visitElementA(in a : ConcreteElementA) ConcreteImplementorA ConcreteImplementorB
+visitElementB(in b : ConcreteElementB)
+operationImp( ) +operationImp( )

ConcreteElementA
+accept(in v : Visitor)
ConcreteElementB Purpose
+accept(in v : Visitor) Defines an abstract object structure independently of the
implementation object structure in order to limit coupling.
Purpose
Allows for one or more operations to be applied to a set of objects Use When
at runtime, decoupling the operations from the object structure.
n
Abstractions and implementations should not be bound at
compile time.
Use When n
Abstractions and implementations should be independently
n
An object structure must have many unrelated operations extensible.
performed upon it. n
Changes in the implementation of an abstraction should
n
The object structure can’t change but operations performed have no impact on clients.
on it can. n
Implementation details should be hidden from the client.
n
Operations must be performed on the concrete classes of an
Example
object structure.
The Java Virtual Machine (JVM) has its own native set of functions
n
Exposing internal state or operations of the object structure
that abstract the use of windowing, system logging, and byte
is acceptable. code execution but the actual implementation of these functions
n
Operations should be able to operate on multiple object is delegated to the operating system the JVM is running on.
structures that implement the same interface sets. When an application instructs the JVM to render a window it
Example delegates the rendering call to the concrete implementation
Calculating taxes in different regions on sets of invoices would of the JVM that knows how to communicate with the operating
require many different variations of calculation logic. Implementing system in order to render the window.
a visitor allows the logic to be decoupled from the invoices and
line items. This allows the hierarchy of items to be visited by cal-
COMPOSITE Object Structural
culation code that can then apply the proper rates for the region.
Changing regions is as simple as substituting a different visitor.
<<interface>>
Component
children
ADAPTER Class and Object Structural +operation( )
+add(in c : Component )
+remove(in c : Component )
+getChild(in i : int)
<<interface>>
Adapter
Client
+operation( ) Component
Leaf +operation( )
+operation( ) +add(in c : Component )
ConcreteAdapter +remove(in c : Component )
Adaptee
-adaptee +getChild(in i : int)
+operation( ) +adaptedOperation ( )
Purpose
Purpose Facilitates the creation of object hierarchies where each object
Permits classes with disparate interfaces to work together by can be treated independently or as a set of nested objects
creating a common object by which they may communicate through the same interface.
and interact. Use When
Use When n
Hierarchical representations of objects are needed..
n
A class to be used doesn’t meet interface requirements. n
Objects and compositions of objects should be treated uniformly.
n
Complex conditions tie object behavior to its state. Example
n
Transitions between states need to be explicit. Sometimes the information displayed in a shopping cart is the
Example product of a single item while other times it is an aggregation
A billing application needs to interface with an HR application in of multiple items. By implementing items as composites we can
order to exchange employee data, however each has its own inter- treat the aggregates and the items in the same way, allowing us
face and implementation for the Employee object. In addition, the to simply iterate over the tree and invoke functionality on each
SSN is stored in different formats by each system. By creating an item. By calling the getCost() method on any given node we
adapter we can create a common interface between the two appli- would get the cost of that item plus the cost of all child items,
cations that allows them to communicate using their native objects allowing items to be uniformly treated whether they were single
and is able to transform the SSN format in the process. items or groups of items.

DZone, Inc. | www.dzone.com

 5
Design Patterns
tech facts at your fingertips

DECORATOR Object Structural FLYWEIGHT Object Structural

<<interface>> ConcreteComponent FlyweightFactory <<interface>>

Component Flyweight

◆
+operation( ) +getFlyweight(in key)
+operation ( ) +operation( in extrinsicState)

Decorator Client
+operation( )

ConcreteDecorator ConcreteFlyweight
-addedState -intrinsicState UnsharedConcreteFlyweight
+operation ( ) +operation ( in extrinsicState) -allState
+addedBehavior ( ) +operation ( in extrinsicState)

Purpose Purpose
Allows for the dynamic wrapping of objects in order to modify Facilitates the reuse of many fine grained objects, making the
their existing responsibilities and behaviors. utilization of large numbers of objects more efficient.

Use When Use When

n
Many like objects are used and storage cost is high.
n
Object responsibilities and behaviors should be dynamically
modifiable.
n
The majority of each object’s state can be made extrinsic.
n
A few shared objects can replace many unshared ones.
n
Concrete implementations should be decoupled from
responsibilities and behaviors.
n
The identity of each object does not matter.
n
Subclassing to achieve modification is impractical or impossible. Example
n
Specific functionality should not reside high in the object hierarchy. Systems that allow users to define their own application flows
n
A lot of little objects surrounding a concrete implementation is and layouts often have a need to keep track of large numbers of
acceptable. fields, pages, and other items that are almost identical to each
other. By making these items into flyweights all instances of each
Example
object can share the intrinsic state while keeping the extrinsic
Many businesses set up their mail systems to take advantage of
state separate. The intrinsic state would store the shared properties,
decorators. When messages are sent from someone in the company
such as how a textbox looks, how much data it can hold, and
to an external address the mail server decorates the original
what events it exposes. The extrinsic state would store the
message with copyright and confidentiality information. As long
unshared properties, such as where the item belongs, how to
as the message remains internal the information is not attached.
react to a user click, and how to handle events.
This decoration allows the message itself to remain unchanged
until a runtime decision is made to wrap the message with
additional information. PROXY Object Structural

FACADE Object Structural Client

<<interface>>
Subject
Facade
Complex System +request( )

RealSubject represents Proxy

+request( ) +request( )

Purpose
Allows for object level access control by acting as a pass through
Purpose
Supplies a single interface to a set of interfaces within a system. entity or a placeholder object.

Use When Use When

n
A simple interface is needed to provide access to a complex
n
The object being represented is external to the system.
system. n
Objects need to be created on demand.
n
There are many dependencies between system implementations n
Access control for the original object is required.
and clients. n
Added functionality is required when an object is accessed.
n
Systems and subsystems should be layered. Example
Example Ledger applications often provide a way for users to reconcile
By exposing a set of functionalities through a web service their bank statements with their ledger data on demand, automat-
the client code needs to only worry about the simple interface ing much of the process. The actual operation of communicating
being exposed to them and not the complex relationships that with a third party is a relatively expensive operation that should be
may or may not exist behind the web service layer. A single limited. By using a proxy to represent the communications object
web service call to update a system with new data may actually we can limit the number of times or the intervals the communica-
involve communication with a number of databases and systems, tion is invoked. In addition, we can wrap the complex instantiation
however this detail is hidden due to the implementation of the of the communication object inside the proxy class, decoupling
façade pattern. calling code from the implementation details.

DZone, Inc. | www.dzone.com

 6
Design Patterns
tech facts at your fingertips

ABSTRACT FACTORY Object Creational FACTORY METHOD Object Creational

Client <<interface>> Creator

Product
+factoryMethod( )
<<interface>> <<interface>>
+anOperation( )
AbstractFactory AbstractProduct
+createProductA( )
+createProductB( )
ConcreteProduct ConcreteCreator
+factoryMethod( )
ConcreteFactory
ConcreteProduct
+createProductA( ) Purpose
+createProductB( ) Exposes a method for creating objects, allowing subclasses to
control the actual creation process.
Purpose
Provide an interface that delegates creation calls to one or Use When
more concrete classes in order to deliver specific objects.
n
A class will not know what classes it will be required to create.
n
Subclasses may specify what objects should be created.
Use When n
Parent classes wish to defer creation to their subclasses.
n
The creation of objects should be independent of the system
utilizing them. Example
Many applications have some form of user and group structure
n
Systems should be capable of using multiple families of objects.
for security. When the application needs to create a user it will
n
Families of objects must be used together.
typically delegate the creation of the user to multiple user
n
Libraries must be published without exposing implementation
implementations. The parent user object will handle most
details.
operations for each user but the subclasses will define the factory
n
Concrete classes should be decoupled from clients.
method that handles the distinctions in the creation of each type
Example of user. A system may have AdminUser and StandardUser objects
Email editors will allow for editing in multiple formats including each of which extend the User object. The AdminUser object
plain text, rich text, and HTML. Depending on the format being may perform some extra tasks to ensure access while the
used, different objects will need to be created. If the message StandardUser may do the same to limit access.
is plain text then there could be a body object that represented
just plain text and an attachment object that simply encrypted
the attachment into Base64. If the message is HTML then the PROTOTYPE Object Creational

body object would represent HTML encoded text and the

attachment object would allow for inline representation and a Client
standard attachment. By utilizing an abstract factory for creation
<<interface>>
we can then ensure that the appropriate object sets are created Prototype
based upon the style of email that is being sent. +clone( )

BUILDER Object Creational ConcretePrototype 1 ConcretePrototype 2

+clone( ) +clone( )

Director <<interface>>
Builder Purpose
◆

+construct( )
+buildPart( ) Create objects based upon a template of an existing objects
through cloning.
ConcreteBuilder Use When
+buildPart( ) n
Composition, creation, and representation of objects should
+getResult( )
be decoupled from a system.
Purpose n
Classes to be created are specified at runtime.
Allows for the dynamic creation of objects based upon easily n
A limited number of state combinations exist in an object.
interchangeable algorithms. n
Objects or object structures are required that are identical or
Use When closely resemble other existing objects or object structures.
n
Object creation algorithms should be decoupled from the system. n
The initial creation of each object is an expensive operation.
n
Multiple representations of creation algorithms are required. Example
n
The addition of new creation functionality without changing Rates processing engines often require the lookup of many
the core code is necessary. different configuration values, making the initialization of the
n
Runtime control over the creation process is required. engine a relatively expensive process. When multiple instances
Example of the engine is needed, say for importing data in a multi-threaded
A file transfer application could possibly use many different manner, the expense of initializing many engines is high. By
protocols to send files and the actual transfer object that will be utilizing the prototype pattern we can ensure that only a single
created will be directly dependent on the chosen protocol. Using copy of the engine has to be initialized then simply clone the
a builder we can determine the right builder to use to instantiate engine to create a duplicate of the already initialized object.
the right object. If the setting is FTP then the FTP builder would The added benefit of this is that the clones can be streamlined
be used when creating the object. to only include relevant data for their situation.

DZone, Inc. | www.dzone.com

 7
Design Patterns
tech facts at your fingertips

Use When
SINGLETON Object Creational n
Exactly one instance of a class is required.
n
Controlled access to a single object is necessary.
Example
Singleton
Most languages provide some sort of system or environment
-static uniqueInstance object that allows the language to interact with the native operat-
-singletonData
ing system. Since the application is physically running on only one
+static instance( ) operating system there is only ever a need for a single instance of
+singletonOperation( )
this system object. The singleton pattern would be implemented
by the language runtime to ensure that only a single copy of the
Purpose system object is created and to ensure only appropriate processes
Ensures that only one instance of a class is allowed within a system. are allowed access to it.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR RECOMMENDED BOOK

Jason McDonald Capturing a wealth of experience
The product of two computer programmers, Jason McDonald wrote his about the design of object-oriented
first application in BASIC while still in elementary school and has been software, four top-notch designers
heavily involved in software ever since. He began his software career present a catalog of simple and
when he found himself automating large portions of one of his first jobs. succinct solutions to commonly
Finding his true calling, he quit the position and began working as a occurring design problems. Previously
software engineer for various small companies where he was responsi- undocumented, these 23 patterns
ble for all aspects of applications, from initial design to support. He has roughly 11 years allow designers to create more
of experience in the software industry and many additional years of personal software flexible, elegant, and ultimately
experience during which he has done everything from coding to architecture to leading reusable designs without having to rediscover the design
and managing teams of engineers. Through his various positions he has been exposed solutions themselves.
to design patterns and other architectural concepts for years. Jason is the founder of
the Charleston SC Java Users Group and is currently working to help found a Charleston
chapter of the International Association of Software Architects. BUY NOW
Personal Blog: http://www.mcdonaldland.info/ books.dzone.com/books/designpatterns
Projects: Charleston SC Java Users Group

Get More FREE Refcardz. Visit refcardz.com now!

Upcoming Refcardz: Available:
Core Seam Essential Ruby Core CSS: Part I

Core CSS: Part III Essential MySQL Struts2

JUnit and EasyMock Core .NET
Hibernate Search
Getting Started with MyEclipse Very First Steps in Flex
FREE
Equinox Spring Annotations C#

EMF Core Java Groovy

Core CSS: Part II NetBeans IDE 6.1 Java Editor
XML
PHP RSS and Atom
JSP Expression Language Getting Started with JPA GlassFish Application Server
ALM Best Practices JavaServer Faces Silverlight 2 Design Patterns
Published June 2008
HTML and XHTML Visit refcardz.com for a complete listing of available Refcardz.

DZone, Inc.
ISBN-13: 978-1-934238-10-3
1251 NW Maynard
ISBN-10: 1-934238-10-4
Cary, NC 27513
50795
888.678.0399
DZone communities deliver over 4 million pages each month to 919.678.0300

more than 1.7 million software developers, architects and decision Refcardz Feedback Welcome
[email protected]
$7.95

makers. DZone offers something for everyone, including news,

tutorials, cheatsheets, blogs, feature articles, source code and more. Sponsorship Opportunities 9 781934 238103
[email protected]
“DZone is a developer’s dream,” says PC Magazine.
Copyright © 2008 DZone, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by means electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. Reference: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Version 1.0
Johnson, John M. Glissades. Addison-Wesley Professional, November 10, 1994.