KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .887

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 6913.697

df 253

Sig. .000

Based on the outcome of our analysis, we obtained a KMO value of .887. It suggests a
significant amount of shared information among the variables or a strong partial correlation.
Therefore, it is reasonable to proceed with conducting factor analysis.

The null hypothesis for Bartlett's test of sphericity is that a correlation matrix is an identity
matrix, indicating sphericity. In this case it is significant, Chi-square value (6913.697 & p =
0.000) which is less than 0.05 thus we reject the null hypothesis It indicates that the sphericity
assumption has been violated. In other words it suggests that the correlation matrix is appropriate
for factor analysis because the variables show high covariance

Communalities

Initial Extraction

I would find IoT applications

in maintenance would be 1.000 .801
useful in my job.
Using IoT applications in
maintenance would help me
1.000 .858
accomplish jobs more
quickly.
Using IoT applications in
maintenance would increase 1.000 .855
my productivity.
Learning how to use and
operate the IoT application in 1.000 .867
maintenance is easy for me.
My interaction with IoT
applications in maintenance
1.000 .895
service would be clear and
understandable.
I find IoT applications in
maintenance services would 1.000 .881
be easy to use.
People who are important to
me would think that I should 1.000 .828
use IoT applications.
People who influence my
behavior would think that I 1.000 .789
should use IoT services.
People whose opinions that I
value would prefer that I use 1.000 .783
IoT applications.
I think I have the resource
necessary to use IoT 1.000 .734
applications in maintenance.
I think I have the knowledge
1.000 .669
necessary to use IOT.
I think I can get help from
others when I have
1.000 .447
difficulties using IoT
applications.
All the information I get on
1.000 .809
IoT services confuses me.
The more I learn about IoT
applications, the harder it 1.000 .909
seems to choose the best.
There are so many IoT
applications to choose from 1.000 .905
that I often feel confused.
I intend to continue using IoT
1.000 .785
in the future.
Will always try to use IoT in
1.000 .847
my daily life.
I plan to continue to use IoT
1.000 .905
frequently.
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 1)
1.000 .824
Plant network IoT application
and services
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 2) 1.000 .771
IoT application and services
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 3) 1.000 .520
Smart car IoT service
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 4)
1.000 .858
IoT application in
maintenance.
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 5)
1.000 .799
Smart workflow IoT
applications and services.

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Commonalities all of them are good there is greater than 0.5, so we will go with Kaisers criteria
and the total variance explained from these 4 factors , so this will be a three factor solution the
cumulative percentage 79.733%, which is good. However, the sample size is greater than 200 i.e.
n=232, we will use scree plot.

Total Variance Explained

Extraction Sums of Squared

Initial Eigenvalues Loadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings

Compone % of Cumulative % of Cumulative % of Cumulative

nt Total Variance % Total Variance % Total Variance %

1 11.744 51.063 51.063 11.744 51.063 51.063 9.573 41.621 41.621

2 2.744 11.932 62.994 2.744 11.932 62.994 3.472 15.094 56.715
3 2.567 11.160 74.155 2.567 11.160 74.155 2.653 11.536 68.250
4 1.283 5.578 79.733 1.283 5.578 79.733 2.641 11.482 79.733
5 .973 4.230 83.963
6 .587 2.553 86.515
7 .465 2.022 88.537
8 .397 1.728 90.265
9 .370 1.611 91.876
10 .328 1.424 93.300
11 .262 1.140 94.440
12 .252 1.095 95.534
13 .192 .836 96.370
14 .164 .715 97.085
15 .147 .639 97.724
16 .124 .539 98.263
17 .096 .419 98.682
18 .081 .352 99.034
19 .074 .322 99.355
20 .059 .256 99.612
21 .049 .211 99.823
22 .027 .116 99.939
23 .014 .061 100.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

The scree plot above shows that point of inflexion is on 4 number of factors so we are going to
keep four factors.

As we conducted Varimax oblique rotation twe will check the table labelled Pattern Matrix.

Rotated Component Matrixa

Component

1 2 3 4

I would find IoT applications

in maintenance would be .856
useful in my job.
Using IoT applications in
maintenance would help me
.880
accomplish jobs more
quickly.
Using IoT applications in
maintenance would increase .875
my productivity.
Learning how to use and
operate the IoT application in .878
maintenance is easy for me.
My interaction with IoT
applications in maintenance
.882
service would be clear and
understandable.
I find IoT applications in
maintenance services would .914
be easy to use.
People who are important to
me would think that I should .883
use IoT applications.
People who influence my
behavior would think that I .874
should use IoT services.
People whose opinions that I
value would prefer that I use .864
IoT applications.
I think I have the resource
necessary to use IoT .811
applications in maintenance.
I think I have the knowledge
.752
necessary to use IOT.
I think I can get help from
others when I have
.624
difficulties using IoT
applications.
All the information I get on
.893
IoT services confuses me.
The more I learn about IoT
applications, the harder it .953
seems to choose the best.
There are so many IoT
applications to choose from .950
that I often feel confused.
I intend to continue using IoT
.818
in the future.
Will always try to use IoT in
.774
my daily life.
I plan to continue to use IoT
.807
frequently.
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 1)
.882
Plant network IoT application
and services
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 2) .827
IoT application and services
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 3) -.548
Smart car IoT service
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 4)
.914
IoT application in
maintenance.
Please evaluate your
potential usage frequency: 5)
.872
Smart workflow IoT
applications and services.

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 5 iterations.

The above table shows Rotated Component Matrix. For each variable, note the factor/component for
which the variable has the highest loading is above .4 when we ignore the plus or minus sign.it shows
what the 4 factors represent by looking for common themes in the items that load on them.

Component Transformation Matrix

Component 1 2 3 4

1 .884 -.298 .033 .358

2 .181 .721 .662 .091
3 .215 .625 -.748 .057
4 -.373 .005 -.031 .927

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

Based on SPSS analysis, five factors have been extracted using Kaiser's criterion, which suggests
retaining factors with eigenvalues exceeding 1. However, the appropriateness of this decision should be
evaluated. Kaiser's criterion is generally accurate when the number of variables is less than 30, and the
communalities after extraction are greater than 0.7. In this case, the dataset comprises 232 samples and
22 variables, indicating that extracting five factors might not be justified. Examining the scree plot
reveals that there are point of inflexion at 3 and 4 factors, suggesting that extracting 3 or 4 factors would
be more reasonable based on the scree plot analysis.

Factor 1

PE1 I would find IoT application in maintenance would be useful in my job.

PE2 Using IoT application in maintenance would help me accomplish jobs more quickly.
PE3 Using IoT application in maintenance would increase my productivity.
EE1 Learning how to use and operate the IoT application in maintenance is easy for me.
My interaction with IoT application in maintenance service would be clear and
EE2
understandable.
EE3 I find IoT application in maintenance service would be easy to use.
SI1 People who are important to me would think that I should use IoT application.
SI2 People who influence my behavior would think that I should use IoT service.
SI3 People whose opinions that I value would prefer that I use IoT application.
FC2 I think I have the knowledge necessary to use IOT.
FC3 I think I can get help from others when I have difficulties using IoT application.
PB3 Please evaluate your potential usage frequency: 3) Smart car IoT service

Factor 2

Please evaluate your potential usage frequency: 1) Plant network IoT application
PB1
and services
PB2 Please evaluate your potential usage frequency: 2) IoT application and services
FC1 I think I have the resource necessary to use IoT application in maintenance.
PB5 Please evaluate your potential usage frequency: 5) Smart workflow IoT application
and services.

Factor 3

OC1 All the information I get on IoT service confuse me.

 OC2 The more I learn about IoT application, the harder it seems to choose the best.
OC3 There are so many IoT application to choose from that I often feel confused.

Factor 4

BI1 I intend to continue using IoT in the future.

BI2 Will always try to use IoT in my daily life.
BI3 I plan to continue to use IoT frequently.

Cronbach’s Alpha

The table below shows that there are 232 cases in this test and none is deleted, so that’s useful to know
and a reliability statistic shows that number of items are 23 and Cronbach’s Alpha is 0.783. The first
thing is value is positive and second the value is close to 1 this means that data is reliable. According to
Kline (1999), if the value is greater than 0.70 the reliable the data is.

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 232 100.0

a
Excluded 0 .0

Total 232 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the

procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items

.783 23