His003 Lesson-2
His003 Lesson-2
Overview:
While it is true that Filipinos are different from one another, they
nonetheless have many commonalities that are, strong bases for unity and
harmony. For instance, many of their ethnic groups belong to the same racial
stock; their languages originated from the same mother Malayo-Polynesian
language; they share common vocabularies, material culture and even values.
With special regard to Mindanao, they even share the same homeland, as
Mindanao has become a shared territory, whether its peoples like it or not.
Learning Outcomes:
At the end of this lesson, the students can:
1. describe Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan (MINSUPALA);
2. understand why Palawan is included in the setting of History 3;
3. identify the peoples of MINSUPALA at present and its categorization;
Materials Needed:
● printed module
● internet connection
● cellphone/laptop
● Philippine Map
Duration: 3 hours
Lesson Content:
1) Where are Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan?
Geographically, the name “Mindanao” is understood (or is it
misunderstood?) by people, mostly by Filipino speakers and writers, to mean two
things, which often results in some kind of prepositional confusion. First, it refers
to the second largest island in the archipelago, in which concept of the word
people are said to live and events takes place (with the correct preposition) “on
Mindanao,” that is, on that island. Second, to people’s minds, the term stands
also for the group of islands that comprises of mainland Mindanao and the
adjacent islands in the southern part of the country, in which case, people talk
about events taking place “in Mindanao,” the region. Most times, Filipino
speakers and writers use the preposition “in” even when they mean “on” the
island (as they would erroneously say, “in Luzon”); the prepositional tangle
continues as part of living history.
With a land area of 94,630 km2 (about 10,000 km2 smaller than Luzon),
the mainland of Mindanao provides a large amount of agricultural, industrial,
commercial and tourism potentials. Together with the island chains of Basilan,
Sulu and Tawi-Tawi, the Mindanao islands group provides 25% of rice; 67% of
cattle and tuna; more than 50% of corn, fish and chicken; 100% of pineapple,
rubber and banana exports; 90% of plywood and lumber; 63% (1 billion metric
tons) of nickel reserves; 48% (50.3 million metric tons) of gold reserves; 38.5%
(2.6 million hectares) of forest and 38% (3.73 million hectares) of farmlands for
the entire Philippine economy. Yet of the 20 poorest provinces in the Philippines
(MBN index), 13 are in the Mindanao region, including all the ARMM provinces.
Caraga (Region XIII) is located in the north western part of Mindanao. Its
provinces are Agusan del Norte, Agusan del Sur, Surigao del Norte, and Surigao
del Sur. The administrative center is Butuan City in Agusan del Norte. The region
also covers the outlying islands of Surigao del Norte such as Dinagat, Siargao
and Bucas Grande Islands.
The Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM)
is a special region, which covers the territories predominantly populated by
Muslims. It consists of almost the whole of the Sulu Archipelago (Isabela City of
Basilan is not part, as it is under the Zamboanga Peninsula region) and two
provinces in the mainland, namely: Lanao del Sur and Maguindanao. The
provinces located in the Sulu Archipelago are Basilan, Tawi-Tawi and Sulu. The
first two provinces (i.e., Basilan and Tawi-Tawi) are themselves the main islands
of their respective provinces, while the main island of Sulu is Jolo Island.
Ironically, Cotabato City, which is not part of the ARMM, is the region’s
administrative center.
3) Who are the peoples of MINSUPALA at present and how may they
be categorized?
Broadly, the peoples of MINSUPALA may be categorized as:
Add to the above observation the fact that some Iliganon families or clans
trace their genealogies to prominent Maranao families in some places in the lake
region.
2. SAMAL (SAMA)
“Sama-sama” which means “togetherness”; they are found in
Sulu archipelago specifically in Simunul and Sibutu Islands. They have an
Arab blood. They possessed highly developed boat-building techniques
and sometimes practicing simple garden agriculture. They are the most
widely dispersed of all ethnolinguistic groups in the Sulu chain.
3. JAMA MAPUN
They are found in Cagayan de Sulu or Tawi-tawi (Mapun
Island). Some are found in Southern Palawan. On closer examination may
not be a distinct group. They are another sub-group of Samal.
4. YAKAN
They are found in Basilan Island; they were formerly known
as Samales (coastal dwellers). Francisco de Combes called them
Sameacas, people who kept much to themselves. They are engaged in
making boats which they sell to the Tausugs. The word Yakan denotes
“Dayak origin”. They are descendants of both Dayak from Northeast
Borneo and Sama from Johore.
5. TAUSOG (JOLOANO)
They are the dominant ethnic group in the Sulu archipelago,
are the sole residents of Jolo, the historical seat of the Sultanate of Sulu.
They are known as the “people of the sea/current”. However, there are
many farmers among the Tausog, locally called Tauguimba or
Guimbahanon “inland people” by the shore-dwellers. They are found all
over, ranging even to distant Palawan and the East Malaysian State of
Sabah.
6. MOLBOG
They are found in Balabac Island and Southern Palawan. The term
is derived from the word “Malubog” meaning “murky or turbid water”,
probably because they are migrants from North Borneo. In the past, they
were ruled by the Sulu sultans, forming the outer periphery of the Sulu
sultanate. Intermarriage between Tausogs and Molbog hastened the
Islamization of the Molbog.
They are found in Southern Palawan. They are still in the stage of being
Islamized. “People in scattered places” as the Tausogs called them. They
closely resemble the Tagbanua.
1. MAGINDANAWN
They are the “people of the flooded plain”. They are found in the
Cotabato region, known also as the Pulangi River Valley. Their name
derives from the fact that the river regularly overflows its banks, inundating
the adjacent plains. They are commonly found in the province of
Magindanaw.
2. IRANUN (ILANUN)
Lanaw-en is a word of Magindanaw origin meaning “people from
the lake”. The name I-Lanaw-en is a clue to the origins of the Iranun
marauders. It suggests that they were originally Mranaw; “people of the
lake” from the lofty tableland around Lake Lanao in central Mindanao.
They are found from Buldon to Parang, along the shores of Ilana Bay.
8. MRANAW/MERANAO
They are found in the Lanao region, “people of the lake”. The term
is from the word Ranaw means “lake”. They are walled in by mountains
and isolated in their highland fastness, Mranaw artisans developed arts of
weaving, wood carving, and metal work. The Mranaws remained little
known to Spanish invaders, European travelers, and traders because of
their upland agricultural orientation.
9. KALIBUGAN (KOLIBUGAN)
They are found in the Zamboanga peninsula. They are neither
Muslims nor Christians. They are close relatives of the Subanen, where
there is Subanen, there is also Kalibugan. Kolibugan or Kalibugan means
“half-breed”.
We can therefore understand the bias and hatred the Spaniards had
against the Muslims. Being colonized for more than 700 years was not among
their more pleasant experiences. Nevertheless, if the Spaniards begrudged and
resented the Moorish colonization of southern Spain, it is important to stress that
the Muslims of Mindanao and Sulu had nothing to do with it. It would be quite
unfair if one let the Muslims of Mindanao and Sulu “pay” for the “mistakes” of
their North African religious counterparts.
Anyhow, the Spaniards appeared to have made the Muslims of Mindanao
and Sulu “pay” for some Spanish hurt incurred elsewhere in the globe, while the
Christianized natives of Luzon, Visayas and northern Mindanao were made to
enforce the collection of this “payment” by conscripting them to fight Spain’s war
of aggression against the Muslim Sultanates of Mindanao and Sulu. Unaware
that the Christianized natives were only forced into the military expeditions, the
Muslims started hating the Christianized natives, too. The latter would eventually
bear the brunt of the former’s retaliatory raids. As a consequence, the
Christianized natives started associating negative connotations with the term
“Moro.” Thus, the term became equated with pirate, kidnapper, enslaver, thief,
traitor, et cetera. Its negative connotation was so profound that it did not begin to
get turned around in meaning and accepted even among Muslims until around
the emergence of the Moro National Liberation Front, which, in effect, “cleansed”
the term of its unpleasant meanings. In the words of the MNLF:
One may presume that the above-enumerated tribes, just like the Moros,
have long wanted to articulate their wish to exercise their right to self-
determination but, for a long time, they have been incapacitated by lack of
organization. In June 1986, after the EDSA-1 Revolution, representatives from
fifteen tribes converged and decided to organize the “Lumad-Mindanao,” the first
Lumad organization with the goal to achieve “self-governance within their
ancestral domain in accordance with their culture and customary laws.” The term
“lumad” was actually a borrowed word from Cebuano, which literally means,
“indigenous.” The tribes deemed it necessary to adopt the Cebuano term
because they had no common language except Cebuano.
References:
Caballero, Juvanni Yahya A. 2016, A HISTORY OF FILIPINO MUSLIMS AND
Gowing, Peter G. 1979, Muslim Filipino – Heritage and Horizon. Quezon City:
Kadil, B.J. 2002. History of the Moro and Indigenous Peoples in MINSUPALA,