Final Thesis
Final Thesis
MARY’S UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES
BY
SOLOMON ASSEFA
JULY, 2017
ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA
IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES,
TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES AT MINISTRY OF INFORMATION
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
BY
SOLOMON ASSEFA
JULY, 2017
ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA
ST. MARY UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES
BY
SOLOMON ASSEFA
__________________________ __________________________
Name Signature
St. Mary’s University, Addis Ababa July, 2017
Endorsement
i
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
First of all I would like to thank GOD for his priceless gift.
I wish to express my deep appreciation to my advisor, Dr. Alula Tessema, for his
continuous guidance, patience, encouragement, and helpful comments and suggestions
throughout the whole research and I would thank all of the individuals who agreed to
volunteer their time and information, for responding to questions from questionnaires
and interview and my sincere gratitude should extend to my colleagues especially
classmates for their challenges and moral support towards accomplishment of the study.
Finally, thanks most of all to my wife Tigist Shiferaw for her love, patience,
understanding and support.
Solomon Assefa
i
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1: List of respondents in the survey based on their job title .................................. 40
Table 4.3: Percentage frequency distribution for Project initiation process group .............. 42
Table 4.4: Percentage frequency distribution for Project planning process group ............... 45
Table 4.5: Percentage frequency distribution for Project Execution process group ............ 48
Table 4.6: Percentage frequency distribution for Project Monitoring & Control
Table 4.7: Percentage frequency distribution for Project closing process group ................ 52
Table 4.8 Percentage frequency distribution of the level of agreement on the impacts ..... 54
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Ethiopia ICTD status compared to Kenya, Malawi and Tanzania ..................... 19
Figure 2.2 Denmark’s digital ecosystem ............................................................................. 20
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................i I
ii
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS............................................................................... II
ii
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ III
LIST OF FIGURES ...............................................................................................................IV
iv
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ VII
vii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1
1.1.BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................1
1.2.STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM .......................................................................................................................3
1.3.BASIC RESEARCH QUESTIONS ........................................................................................................................6
1.4.OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY .............................................................................................................................6
1.5.SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: ...................................................................................................................................6
1.6.SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY ...............................................................................................................................6
1.7.SCOPE OF STUDY ...........................................................................................................................................7
1.8.DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS ...........................................................................................................................7
1.9.ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY ......................................................................................................................7
v
4.1 ANALYSIS DISCUSSION AND RESULTS .........................................................................................................34
4.1.1 Demographic Information of the Respondents ...................................................................................34
4.1.2 Project Management initiation Process Groups Practice ...................................................................35
4.1.3 Project Management Planning Process Groups Practice ...................................................................37
4.1.4 Project Execution Process Group Practice ........................................................................................40
4.1.5 Project Monitoring & Control Process Group Practice .....................................................................42
4.1.6 Project Closing Process Group Practice ............................................................................................45
APPENDIX I .................................................................................................................. 57
APPENDIX II .................................................................................................................. 61
vi
ABSTRACT
vii
1. CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1
closure of the project (Schwable, 2014). Basically, such endeavor primarily is attempted
by giving a due attention the strategically context; larger goals of the organization.
The majority of public sector ICT applications in least developed countries are either in
partial or total failures (E-Development: From Excitement to Effectiveness, 2005). One of the
reasons for failure, as mentioned by the World Bank, is a poor project design and
management. The failure begins since inception of such projects. Another, recent study
conducted by McKinsey & Company on 5,400 large scales IT projects found that, the
problems with IT Project Management are proliferating as opposed to the dynamism of
the field. Among the key findings quoted from the report:
Based on the GTP II strategic document Ethiopia, as a developing country, gives much
emphasis to the development of ICT which it is considered as one of the major enabler in
every aspects of the development of the economy; “During the plan period, the major
strategic directions were to enhance the information communication technology
infrastructure and human development, utilize ICT in government administration,
industry development and private sector development. ICT equipment producing
industries have started to emerge in the economy, while a number of ICT service
providing enterprises have already become operational in Adds Ababa ICT Park. In the
coming few years, these emerging enterprises are expected to create wide ranges of job
opportunities and enhance the export mix of the country” (Growth and Transformation
Plan II, 2016).
As it is noted in the national IT policy setting standards and procedures for effective
project management and accountability for national and sector specific programs and
projects are given to MCIT to enhance the successful implementations of projects(The
National Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Policy and Strategy, 2016).
Therefore, as an IT and project management professional the researcher is interested to
2
assess the extent to which implementation of project management tools and techniques
have created a positive impact at MCIT projects in Addis Ababa.
3
Aligning project management strategies with strategic objectives is a vital way to
achieving competitive advantage. Projects are integral parts of organization undertaken
for various business goals and its management offers numerous benefits including and
not limited to; Efficiency in operations, Reduction in failure rate of projects, Business
Expansion, Competitive Edge, Organizational Flexibility, Quality and Quantity
Assurance, Communication Improvement ,and Resource Optimization (PMI, 2014).
There are many reasons (simple and complex) why projects fail. Goatham (2014)
identified common sources of project failures as follows;
4
9. Communications failures – Projects fail if communication is
ineffective. For a project to succeed, communication must be
seamless between all project stakeholders. Communication
inspires confidence, provides deeper insight through various
perspectives, reduces stakeholders’ conflicts and increases project
success;
Carlos (2009) also outlined common reasons for project failures as follows:
1. Poorly defined project roles, responsibilities, objectives, and
goals;
2. The application of project methodologies with a “one tool for all
projects” disposition of some project managers;
3. Lack of end-user participation in the course of project
implementation for acceptable criteria for project success
definition;
4. Inadequate or vague project requirements;
5. Project team weaknesses and competing priorities;
6. Insufficient project resources (finance, personnel and material);
7. Ignoring early project warning signs by project stakeholders,
especially the project manager;
8. Inadequate testing procedure and shifting project objectives.
The lists of reasons for project failures are as many as authors, perspectives, and
categorizations to the matter under discussion. However, the enumerated reasons are
common issues typical of a developing economy like Ethiopia.
5
enhance the accomplishment of the objectives and goals which results the success of the
project.
The question remains if Ethiopian ICT contractors and consultants understand the
importance of effective and timely application of project management concepts in the
deployment and implementation of ICT Projects, to what extent that the contractors,
consultants and other stakeholders apply it properly. Therefore, this research will explore
the gap between the theory of ICT project management and its practice in MCIT.
1. To what extent the Project Management tools and techniques are put into
practice in management of ICT projects in MCIT?
2. Are policy and producers of ICT project management are implemented in
ICT projects of MCIT?
The main objective of this study was to assess the implementation of tools and
techniques of Project management into practices of ICT projects and its impact on
MCIT performances in Addis Ababa main office of MCIT of Ethiopia.
6
management practices that have positive relationship with project success. This would
contribute to realizing improved performance of ICT implementation in all sectors of
development in Ethiopia.
7
2 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
10
The project owner has ultimate responsibility for managing the project and
can be regarded as both owner and main contractor – in other words the core
of the project is internal to the organization.
Information technology projects are different and therefore must have a unique set of
project management tools and techniques to accomplish them. However, project
management techniques and tools can apply to any project in any industry, regardless of
whether it involves software, hardware, construction, engineering, or services. It is not
the tools that are different, but rather the projects. What make IT projects different are
their unique risks, the rapid development requirements to meet rush-to-market demands,
the short life of technology, and multiple dependencies with other projects. The tools are
the same, but they must be applied differently depending upon the project type and
complexity. A review of the five major project management methodologies will be
discussed as follows. These methodologies include: Agile, Prince2, Six Sigma, System
Development Life Cycle (SDLC), and Waterfall.
2.2.2.1 Agile
The software industry faced significant challenges with the rise of computer processing
and the Internet Age. Software developers were unable to create a sustainable software
application product because of the number of glitches that a software application faced in
different microcomputer environments or with upgrades to computer operating systems.
This prompted several information technology engineers to come together at the turn of
the twenty- first century to create the Agile Alliance (Mellor, 2005). In the Alliance’s
well-known Agile Manifesto, the proponents of a more lightweight method of software
development share a project management methodology that has become recognized as an
Agile Project Management.
2.2.2.2 Prince2
The Prince2 project management methodology stands for Projects IN Controlled
Environments (Skogmar, 2015) and was developed in 1989. It is the project management
standard for the UK government’s information technology projects, though it is now used
extensively in both the public and private sectors. Prince2 is described as a structured
project management approach and centers on eight characteristic techniques for the
successful administration and control of a project (Ibid).
are:
13
Monitoring the implementation of the e-Government Program on the different
aspects (technical, administrative and financial);
Project Addition/Deletion Approval
Supporting with evaluating requests received from the different Ministries/Agencies for
implementations, and Supporting project's execution tasks through the identification and
allocation of required resources, Knowledge sharing of experiences gained through
executing the different Program components and procurement and contracting process
management.
The organization structure of the PMO was developed based on the above mandate,
where the following key departments have the core teams tasked to deliver listed roles:
Project Coordination
Knowledge Management
Appraisal
ITSG (IT Services Group)
Marketing & Awareness
Monitoring & Evaluation
The PMO contains a pool of resources that can be assigned different tasks depending on
workload, projects nature and projects level of maturity. Accordingly, one team member
can play several roles that can be of monitoring, support, and knowledge or procurement
nature.
2.3.3 IT Policy
The Government of Ethiopia has made the development of Information and
communications technology one of its strategic plan priorities. The endorsed and
currently enforce ICT policy is a presentment of its dedication to the development of ICT
both as an industry and as an enabler of all-rounded socioeconomic transformation. ICT
in Ethiopia at present is in its early phase of growth. The major indicators pointing to the
low degree of ICT Development area:
14
2.3.3.1 The absence of appropriate legal and regulatory frameworks.
2.3.3.4 Lack of skilled human resources coupled with low ICT literacy.
As per the strategy, the e-government service delivery was to be facilitated and
strengthened through six core projects, including:
The National Payment Gateway,
The Enterprise Architecture framework,
The Public Key Infrastructure,
The National Data Set,
16
The National Enterprise Service Bus and
The National Integrated Authentication Framework.
In summation to the above mentioned tasks, common applications that horizontally cut
across all ministries has been projected to be implemented. These include initiatives like
E-Procurement, Human resource Management System, E-Office, E-Mail and Integrated
Financial Management Information System (IFMIS).
Established on the strategy, most of the objects have been attained in the first Growth
and transformation plan (GTPI) period of the execution. Ethiopia’s first information
technology park which is called as “Ethio ICT Village” is also inaugurated and began
operation recently. The park is based on a 200 hectare site.
The IT Park is being built with a perspective of building an Information Technology (IT)
village based on the tight linkage between research, industry and business in IT and IT
enabled services and is expected to draw foreign investors as good as local ones. The IT
Park has various functional zones like business, assembly and warehouse, commercial,
administrative and Knowledge Park. The main focal point of the park is to attract IT,
manufacturing, development of the IT services industry and Business Process
Outsourcing (BPO).
The infrastructure and access sub-index captures ICT readiness and includes five
indicators (fixed telephone, mobile telephone, international internet bandwidth,
households with computers, and households with internet).
The employment sub-index captures ICT intensity and includes three ICT
indicators (internet users, fixed [wired] broadband, and mobile broadband).
The skills sub-index captures ICT capability and includes three proxy indicators
(adult literacy, gross secondary enrollment, and gross tertiary enrolment). This
sub-indicator is given less weight than the other two sub-indices in the
calculation of the IDI.
Ethiopia ranked very low, at 169th out of 175 countries, on the 2016 IDI. Ethiopia’s
standing was well below Mozambique, Tanzania, and Malawi, countries that also hit low
in the IDI.
17
Figure 2.1: Ethiopian ICT development status compared to Kenya, Malawi and Tanzania
Denmark is a highly developed ICT nation with a rank of 3 IDI 2016 Value 8.74 (ICT
development index, 2016). The country has a strong foundation that can address the
existing challenges like Health and well-being, Secure, clean and efficient energy, Green
transport, Safe food and sustainable agriculture, Efficient use of resources and Inclusive
and safe societies. ICT development is central for all these challenges and ICT thus is a
key technology in pursuing growth through research and innovation (Agency for
Digitisation, 2016).
The Danish digital ecosystem, as shown in the figure below, has a strong technological
foundation for system development integrating hardware and software and embedded
systems. It also comprises one of the most competitive and advanced telecommunications
infrastructure and mobile markets. This will be central for the development of new smart
products for applications in health, energy, environment and the future internet.
Moreover, the ICT industry is strong, particularly when it comes to developing solutions
for tomorrow's applications across industries and in private-public cooperation.
18
Figure 2.2: Denmark’s digital ecosystem Denmark’s digital ecosystem
20
modernization of government services through digitization. Through the introduction
of “Digital by default” as a principle for providing services, government agencies can,
to a greater degree, focus their activities on providing fully-fledged digital solutions.
21
In Norway, ICT projects are centralized and procedures for evaluation of projects are
thoroughly implemented ((van der Veen, 2015). These evaluations are used to create
continuous improvement by learning from previous projects.
ICT Initiatives are primarily focused on e-Government and Public Key Infrastructure
(PKI), e-Infrastructure including EthERNet , Entrepreneurship and education.
Over the past few years, there have been a number of national initiatives focused on
provoking the use of ICT including: the National Data Set; National Enterprise Service
Bus (NESB); Public Key Infrastructure (PKI); EthioICT-Village; WoredaNet;
Integrated Financial Management Information System; ICT Business Incubation Centre;
EthERNet (Ethiopian Education and Research Network) and SchoolNet (ITS Africa,
2014).
This project aims to provide a national level data set of commonly used data elements
across Ministries, which can be used by all inter-ministerial applications as well as
channels of delivery (national portal, mobile portal, CSC, NCC etc.) for delivering
services.
Coverage: All Ministry and agency application identified in the government strategy
22
The objective of this project is to provide PKI based identification, integrity and non-
repudiation of online transactions related to the government projects in Ethiopia
Coverage: Nationwide initiative for, issuance and use of PKI for all electronic
transactions for government and private
EthioICT-Village
WoredaNET
WoredaNET is a government network connecting more than 800 local, regional and
federal government offices across the country. It is a terrestrial and satellite based
network designed with the primary objective to provide ICT services such as video
conferencing, directory, messaging and Voice Over IP, and Internet connectivity to the
federal, regional and "woreda" level government entities. The WoredaNet
implementation project was part of the broader government Strategy.
23
To provide the lowest level of government with accurate and timely
information.
Geographic scope and frame: All the participating ministries, agencies, regional and
local government offices to be covered in the Woreda-net. 216 electronic services are
going to be delivered.
IFMIS enables public institutions to use a single system with extensive facilities from
one physical source. This enables the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development
(MoFED) to improve the quality of financial decision-making by generating timely
financial information. IFMIS is implemented in government offices.
MICT-BIC was initiated in 2008 under the Information and Communication Technology
Assisted Development (ICTAD) Project of EICTDA in cooperation with the World Bank
and the German Development Service. The project aims to provide solutions to
difficulties that graduates of higher education institutions in Tigray Region, Amhara
Region, Oromiya Region and South Nations and Nationalities Region are facing such as
finding employment in governmental and private organizations. The main objective of
MICT-BIC is to serve as a vehicle for development of a competitive ICT based MSEs
and foster technology innovation in the above mentioned regions.
The Incubation Program is targeted at graduates with ICT related business ideas and
young companies that are interested in incubation services. MICT-BIC is offering
individual advisory and support to develop a comprehensive business plan. In addition,
the incubation center provides a standardized training program on entrepreneurship,
business plan development and incubation services. Currently there are two Incubation
centers in Jigjiga and Diredawa, which are commencing activities.
Geographic scope: Tigray Region, SNNP Region, Amhara Region, Diredawa and Somali
24
EthERNEt - Ethiopian Educational and Research Network
EthERNet was initiated in 2001 as part of a national capacity building program among
other projects that aim to provide connectivity and specialized applications for schools
and local governments. The project was launched to build and deliver highly
interconnected and high performance networks for Universities and other Educational
and Research Institutions in Ethiopia. More specifically EthERNet was aimed to build
and deliver high performance networking that connected these institutions in the world,
and by doing this to enable them to share educational resources and collaborate both
within Ethiopia and globally.
Currently EthERNet has a network with 20Mbit/Sec or better bandwidth that ties many
of the established universities in Ethiopia. In addition, plans have been made to build the
next generation network that would provide 10Gbit/Sec to each of the public universities
and also interconnect them. A driver in this fresh-high-performance/bandwidth network
is EthERNet's vision to offer a highly interconnected and advanced network of Ethiopian
Research and Education institutions that enables institutions to actively and effectively
participate in the national, regional and global research and teaching communities. The
Ministry of Education is currently forming with the ICT Centre of Excellence (Ethiopia)
to construct a solid organizational framework for EthERNet that will enable it to engage
with a wide scope of stakeholders such as Universities, and involve them in helping
define the direction and services that EthERNet develops and pitches.
SchoolNet
The Ministry of Education in Ethiopia launched the SchoolNet Project in 2003 with
support from UNDP. About 756 schools were connected through this task. The second
phase of SchoolNet project is ongoing to connect more schools and to provide internet
access.
25
Geographic scope and frame: high schools, and preparatory Schools, total of 756+
Methodology
Structured To assess the extent to
MCIT e- service Project questionnaire which project management
and application Management Interview tools and techniques are
development Process Document implemented and its impact
team Groups: Review on the management of ICT
Descriptive projects of MCIT.
Initiation, statistics To make sure ICT policy
Qualitative and procedures are in place
Planning, data and implemented
analysis To recommend possible
Execution, solution to stakeholders
attention to ICT projects of
Monitoring and MCIT.
Control
Clothing Process
Groups
Contribution of
applying 27
PMBKA to
3 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
This chapter includes the research methodology of the study, sources and methods of
data collection, the selection of the sample, the research process, validity and Reliability,
the type of data analysis, and the ethical considerations.
Qualitative research, on the other hand, is based on words, feelings, emotions, sounds
and other non-numerical and quantifiable elements. It has been noted that “information is
considered qualitative in nature, if it cannot be analyzed by means of mathematical
techniques. This characteristic may also mean that an incident does not take place often
enough to allow reliable data to be collected” (Herbst, and Coldwell, 2004).
28
The mixed methods research approach means adopting a research strategy employing
more than one type of research method .The methods may be a mix of qualitative and
quantitative methods; inquiry on the assumption that collecting diverse types of data
which can provide an understanding of a research problem (Creswell, 2014). Croswell
further noted that in this approach the study will begin with a survey in order to
generalize results to a population and then it focuses in a second phase, on detailed
qualitative, open-ended interviews to collect detailed views from participants (Ibid).
Purposive sampling is a widely used sampling method which allows a researcher to get
information from a sample of the population that one thinks knows most about the
subject matter. In this type of sampling, the choice of the sample items depends
exclusively on the judgement of the investigator. Purposive sampling techniques include
hand picking of the subject cases that the researcher thinks that possesses rich
information to accomplish the researchers’ objective.
A Sample is a small group element drawn from the population under study representing
the same variables. In other terms a sample is a subset of individuals (i.e., Actual
observations) drawn from a population you collect data from. We make inferences about
a population based on a sample since we usually cannot sample the entire population. In
other words, we infer something about the characteristics of the population of the
sample. On the other hand Sampling is the process of selecting a sample from a
population (Kothari 2004).
In reality there is simply not enough Time, Energy, Money, manpower, Equipment and
Access to suitable sites due to this fact, considering a sample is unquestionable hence to
measure every single ‘item' or site within the ‘parent population' or whole ‘sampling
frame' becomes difficult. Therefore an appropriate sampling strategy should be adopted
to obtain a representative, and statistically valid sample of the whole (Kothari, 2004).
Purpose Sampling, Quota Sampling and convenience sampling are considered as non-
probability sampling.
Sample size:
Sample size means the number sampling units selected from the population for
investigation. The size of sample directly related to standard of accuracy, time, cost and
administration of investigation. The larger the size, items will represent universe more,
but bring difficulty in managing the operation. Smaller in size will not represent the
universe and accuracy in the result will be lowered. So, it should not be too large or too
small, depending upon the study it should be optimized in size.
According to Weisbery an optimum sample survey is one which fulfills the requirements
of efficiency, representation, reliability and flexibility (Weisberg, 2005).
The size depends on several factors for required inference of the study. Some of
them are listed as follows:
Primary data: Are those which are collected a fresh and for the first time
and thus happen to be original in character.
Secondary data: Are those which have been collected by someone else
earlier and which have already been passed through the statistical
process.
31
management processes into five PM process groups & ten PM Knowledge Areas (PMI,
2013).
A questionnaire is developed based on the PM processes defined in the PMBOK guide
under different PM process groups and knowledge areas and it was adopted from
previous research and tailored to organization under investigation (Unab and Kundi,
2014). By considering the nature of the organization under study Project Procurement
Management knowledge area was not included in the questionnaire.
3.3.3 Interviews
The interview is a data collection technique in which participants provide information
about their behavior, thoughts, or feelings in response to questions posed by an
interviewer and it involves some form of interaction between the investigator and the
respondent. It could be administered via telephone (Telephone interview) or Face to
face depending upon the convenience of the respondent and the investigator (Crano and
Brewer, 2002). Interviews can be conducted face-to-face or by telephone. They can
range from in-depth, semi-structured to unstructured depending on the information being
sought (Ibid). A semi-structured interview questions are developed and will be
administered to collect data from higher officials of MCIT.
This stage covered key definitions and concepts relevant to the study and related areas.
The key areas covered include; ICT Project management, Project Management
Methodologies for ICT Projects, ICT Project management practice in developed
countries ,IT Policy, E-government Strategy , State of Ethiopian ICT sector
performance on International ICT indices and E-government initiative projects
In collecting secondary data; there is less limitation and more access as the researcher is
working for government institution and have a work relationship with MCIT enables to
collect as much data as possible without limitation. The major sources of secondary data
in this study included published books, journals, papers and articles. Internet was another
32
source where varieties of current materials were obtained which explains a lot about
Project management.
33
4 CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONS
. Table 4.1: List of respondents in the survey based on their job title
Respondents job title Number of Respondents Percentage of
respondents
Web Developers 5 31.25 %
Total 16 1
0
0
%
34
From Table 4.1, the participants of this research are all professional staff members of
MCIT e-service and application development team members; from the sixiteen
respondents, 31.25% of them are web developers,43.75% of them are Professional
Developers,18.75% and 6.25% team leader
Total 16 100 %
Referring Table 4.2, the level of education shows that 12 (75%) of the respondents are
first degree holders, and the remaining4 ( 25% ) hold a second degree in the field of
Information Technology. The age group shows that between the age of 25 to 35 years 13
(81.25%) and 3 (18.75 %) of them are between the age of 35 to 45 years old. The overall
work experience distribution showing that 11 (68.75 %) of them have 5-10 years of
experience each, 5 (31.25 %) of the respondents have 10 - 15 years.
35
According to PMI, the process of initiating a project helps to set what to be
accomplished. It is the process where the project is formally endorsed by the sponsor,
initial scope defined, stakeholders identified. Furthermore the management chooses and
authorizes a project manager at this process group and as a result Project charter and
Stakeholder register are key deliverables.
Table 4.3:– percentage frequency distribution for Project initiation process group
Sometimes - -
Mostly 10 62.5%
Always 6 37.5%
Total 16 100%
Always - -
Total 16 100%
From Table 4.3 the survey result showed that 10 (62.5%) of the respondents witnessed
that Project charter is mostly developed in the initiation process group and the remaining
6 (37.5%) agreed that the Project charter is developed always. 5 (31.25%) respondents
said that the stakeholder register and Stakeholder management strategy is sometimes
prepared and 5 (31.25%) of them confirms the stakeholder register and Stakeholder
management strategy is never been prepared and the remaining 6(37.5%) concludes
mostly.
According to MCIT e-service and application development team manager; the practice of
project initiation process group usually focuses on the preparation and endorsement of
project charter and the assignment of project managers and there is a limitation regarding
36
to the stakeholder register and Stakeholder management strategy preparation.
Planning processes group include developing and maintaining a feasible plan to ensure
that the project addresses the organization’s requirements and needs. Projects include
several plans, such as the scope management plan, schedule management plan, risk
management plan, cost management plan, Human resource management plan,
communication plan and procurement management plan. These plans define each
knowledge area as it relates to the project at that point in time (Schwalbe, 2012).
Table 4.4:– percentage frequency distribution for Project planning process group
Project Planning frequency Percentage
No Process group
Mostly 0 -
Always 16 100%
Total 16 100%
Always 16 100%
Total 16 100%
Always 5 31.25%
37
Project Planning frequency Percentage
No Process group
Total 16 100%
Always 8 50%
Total 16 100%
Total 16 100%
Mostly 4 25%
Always 12 75%
Total 16 100%
Mostly 12 75%
Always 4 25%
Total 16 100%
38
Project Planning frequency Percentage
No Process group
Always 3 18.75%
Total 16 100%
The data from Table 4.4 is the result obtained from the survey of the practice of planning
process group 16 (100%) of the participants confirms that MCIT always produce Project
Management Plans, Project schedule, Schedule Base lines & Schedule data.
11(68.75 %) of the respondents said MCIT always generates Cost Estimates, Cost
Performance Baseline and Project Funding requirements whereas the remaining
5(31.25%) said mostly. 8 (50%) of the respondents said quality requirements and
Standards are identified and compliance strategies are documented most of the time
whereas the remaining said always. 13 (81.25 %) of the respondents said MCIT mostly
prepares quality Management Plan, Quality Matrices, Quality Checklists and Process
Improvement Plans whereas the remaining 3(18.75%) said always.12(75 %) of the
respondents said MCIT always prepares project human resource plan, whereas the
remaining4( 25%) said mostly. 12(75 %) of the respondents said MCIT mostly
developed Communications Management Plans and the remaining 4 (25%) said always.
7(43.75%) of the respondents said Risk Management strategy is defined, risks are
identified, qualitative & quantitative risk analysis is performed and actions to enhance
opportunities and reduce threats are mostly developed but the remaining 6(37.5%)
39
always and 3 (18.75) sometimes.10(62.5%) of the participant confirms that Risk
Management Plans, Risk Register & Risk related contract decisions are mostly prepared
whereas 3(18.75 %) said always and 3(18.75%) sometimes.
This result go in line with the terms of the interviewee that the project planning process
group practices are carried out in detail as per the standard by using planning and
scheduling tools even though appropriate techniques are used there are some limitations
in quality management ,communication management and risk management planning.
According to the department manager MCIT gives continuous capacity building
activities to enhance the performance of project team members.
Table 4.5:– percentage frequency distribution for Project Execution process group
Project Execution frequency Percentage
No Process group
Total 16 100%
Always 0 -
Total 16 100%
40
Project Execution frequency Percentage
No Process group
Total 16 100%
Total 16 100%
Always 6 37.5%
Total 16 100%
Always 2 12.5 %
Total 16 100%
By referring the result obtained from the survey of the Project Execution Process group
Practice as seen in Table 4.6 11 (68.75%) of the participants confirms that MCIT mostly
Work is performed as defined in the Project management plan to achieve project
41
objectives while 5 (31.5%) confirms it is performed always. 12 (75 %) of the
respondents said Quality requirements and quality control measurements are audited
whereas the remaining 4 (25%) said it is audited sometimes. 13 (81.25 %) of
respondents said Project Teams are acquired and developed to enhance their
competencies, interactions and team environment in most cases while the remaining 3
(18.75 %) always. 11(68.75 %) of the respondents agreed that team member’s
performance is tracked, feedback is provided, issues are resolved and changes are
managed to optimize team performance whereas the remaining 5 (31.25 %) said always.
10 (62.5 %)of respondents Project relevant information is mostly made available to
Stakeholders as planned whereas 37.5% always and Finally 14 (87.5%) of the
participants said Stake holders are communicated and worked with to meet and address
their needs & issues while 2 (12.5%) said always.
As per the words of the department manager the execution process group is the one that
the project plans are actually implemented so the practice in MCIT is:
In recruiting project team members the technical capacity, the ability of working
with others, Project experience are taken into account.
Team members are equipped with the necessary documents of the project like
Conditions of Satisfaction; Project Overview Statement; Requirements
Breakdown Structure and Work Breakdown Structure.
Project operating rules are usually in place
Table 4.6:– percentage frequency distribution for Project Execution process group
Project Monitoring & frequency Percentage
No Control
Process group
42
Project Monitoring & frequency Percentage
No Control
Process group
Mostly 8 50%
Always 8 50%
Total 16 100%
Always 2 12.5%
Total 16 100%
Always 7
Total 16 100%
Always 11 68.75 %
Total 16 100%
43
Project Monitoring & frequency Percentage
No Control
Process group
Always 5 31.25
Total 16 100%
Always 0 -
Total 16 100%
Always 8 50%
Total 16 100%
44
Project Monitoring & frequency Percentage
No Control
Process group
As per the data described in table 4.6 the survey result shows that 8 (50%) of the
respondents said project progress is always tracked, reviewed and regulated while the
remaining 8 (50%) said mostly. 14 (87.5 %) of the participants agreed that Change
Requests are mostly reviewed, approved and managed whereas the remaining 2(12.5%)
said always. 9 (56.25%) of the respondent confirms that Completed project deliverables
acceptance is mostly formalized while the remaining 7 (43.75%) said always. 11
(68.75%) of the respondents infer Project Scope is always monitored/updated and
changes to scope baselines are managed whereas 5 (31.25%) said mostly. 8 (50%) of the
participants Project budget always monitored/ updated and changes to cost baselines are
managed while the remaining 8 (50 %) said mostly. 11 (68.75%) of respondents infers
quality activities are mostly monitored and results are recorded to assess performance
and to recommend necessary changes whereas 31.25% said always. 8 (50%) of the
respondents conclude that Performance Information like status reports, progress
measurements and forecasts are always collected and distributed while the remaining 8
(50 %) infers mostly. 13 (81.25%) of the respondents agreed that Risk response plans are
mostly implemented, identified risks are tracked, residual risks are monitored, new risks
are identified and risk process effectiveness is evaluated but the remaining 3 (18.75%) of
the respondents said always .
Regarding the Project Monitoring & Control Process Group Practice the department
manager confirmed the result obtained from the questionnaire survey. He noted that
progress reporting in every milestone is mandatory like status report and exception report
(whenever there is a deviation from the plan) and project status meetings are conducted
regularly.
Always 8 50%
Total 16 100%
As per table 4.8 8 (50 %) of the respondents infer that the activities across all
management process groups are finalized to formally complete the project or phase is
implemented mostly while the other 8(50%) concluded as always.
During the interview the department manager go in line with the questionnaire survey
result and confirms that activities across all management process groups are finalized to
formally complete and close the project some of the activities include:
Acceptance test procedure
Complete project documentation
Post implementation audit
Document lesson learned
46
Frequency Percentage
No
Agree 7 43.75%
Total 16 100%
Total 16 100%
Agree 11 68.75%
Total 16 100%
Agree 9 56.25 %
Total 16 100%
The data that is presented in the above table shows that 7 (43.75 %) of the respondents
strongly agreed that the proper implementation of Project management tools and
techniques results timely completion of projects of MCIT whereas 7 (43.75%) agree and
the remaining 2 (12.5%) disagree.8 (50%) of the respondents strongly agreed that it has
47
a positive impact on completing the project within the budget whereas the remaining 8
(50%) agrees. 11 (68.75 %) of the respondents agreed that it has a positive impact on the
quality of project deliverables whereas the remaining 5 (31.25%) strongly agrees. 9
(56.25 %) of the respondents agreed that it increases efficiency in delivering projects
while the remaining 7 (43.75) strongly agrees.
From the interview the department manager said that MCIT strongly believes that
projects has to be managed by applying appropriate project management methodology
hence the impacts of the application of project management tools and techniques resulted
good performance history of MCIT project.
48
5 CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
The main objective of this study is to assess the implementation of tools and techniques
of Project management into the practices of ICT projects and its impact on MCIT
performances in Addis Ababa main office of MCIT of Ethiopia. Below is a summary of
the major findings in line with the research questions.
Regarding the extent that Project Management tools and techniques are put into practice
in the management of ICT projects in MCIT the study explores and found that, project
management practices such as initiation; planning, execution, monitoring/control, and
closing were adopted by MCIT in the implementation of their projects. Project
management tools and techniques are mostly implemented in each phase but some
limitations are identified.
Stakeholders participation and involvement is limited no Stakeholder
Register & Stakeholder Management Strategy was prepared at all
Quality activities are monitored and the results are recorded to assess
performance and to recommend necessary changes, but there is a gap in
project quality management.
no means to manage changes in budget changes to cost baselines.
Acquisition & development of Project teams,
Communication with Stakeholders to meet and address their needs and
distribution of relevant information to stakeholders.
The availability and applicability of policy and producers of ICT project management
and their implementation in ICT projects of MCIT main office in Addis Ababa is
identified as follows:
There is no standard methodology for the projects, but in most of its
projects, it uses an agile project management methodology.
E-government strategy and IT policy were approved and implemented.
There are no standards, legal and regulatory framework for the ICT
development.
49
5.2 Conclusion
The conclusion gives the summary of what has already been said in the major findings
from the study questionnaires and the analysis by linking them to the objectives of the
research study. According to the findings of the research the following conclusions are
drawn.
According to the world bank report the majority of public sector ICT applications
in least developed countries is either in part or total failures (World Bank,2005).
Application of Project management methods and principles has become
mandatory. Hence Ethiopia as a developing country transforming from
agricultural lead economy to industrialized economy identifies ICT as one of the
drivers of change and development, institution like MCIT should understand the
importance of effective and timely application of project management concepts in
the deployment and implementation of ICT Projects therefore, this research has
explored the gap between the theory of ICT project management and its practice
in MCIT projects.
50
5.4 Recommendation
The following recommendations are proposed as a result of this research. The
recommendations are specific to MCIT projects and ICT stakeholders employing
improved project management:
51
References
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. (2013). 5th ed. Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania 19073-3299 USA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
Abbasi, Y. and Al-Mharmah, G. (2000). Project management practice by the public sector in a
developing country. International. Journal of Project Management, Vol. 18105–109.(3),
pp.105–109.
Agency for Digitisation (2016). A STRONGER AND MORE SECURE DIGITAL DENMARK.
[ebook] Copenhagen K, Denmark: Danish Ministry of Finance, Local Government Denmark
and Danish Regions. Available at: http://www.fm.dk, www.kl.dk, www.regioner.dk
[Accessed 17 Mar. 2017].
Bajpai, N. (2011). Business Research Methods. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley Pvt. Ltd.
Boland, T. and Fowler, A. (2000). A systems perspective on performance management in public
sector organizations. The International Journal of Public Sector Management,, [online]
13,(15), pp.417-446. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550010350832 [Accessed
11 Mar. 2017].
Cadle, J. and Yeates, D. (2008). Project Management for Information Systems. 5th ed. Pearson
Education Limited, pp.3-21.
Carlos, T. (2009). Reasons Why Projects Fail. [ebook] Available at:
https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/pdf/reasons-why-projects-fail.pdf [Accessed 5 Apr. 2017].
Crane, W. (2012). Principles and Methods of Social Research. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Crano, W. and Brewer, M. (2002). Principles and Methods of Social Research. 2nd ed. London:
LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES.
Creswell, J. (2009). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: Sage.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach. 4th
ed. London: SAGG Publications Inc., pp.215-240.
DAN (2012). Digital Agenda for Norway ICT for Growth and Value Creation. Norwegian
Ministry of Government Administration, Reform and Church Affairs.
Delivering large-scale IT projects on time, on budget, and on value. (2012). McKinsey &
Company.
Dutta, S., Geiger, T. and Lanvin, B. (2015). The Global Information Technology Report 2015.
[eBook] Geneva: World Economic Forum and INSEAD. Available at:
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_IT_Report_2015.pdf [Accessed 15 Feb. 2017].
E-Development: From Excitement to Effectiveness. (2005). [online] Washington, D.C.: 5 The
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, pp.79-81.
52
Available at:
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/261151468325237852/pdf/341470EDevelopmen
t.pdf [Accessed 3 Jan. 2017].
George, D. and Mallery, P. (2005). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and
Reference. [ebook] Available at:
http://wps.ablongman.com/wps/media/385/394732/george4answers.pdf [Accessed 7 May
2017].
Goatham, R. (2013). What is Project Success? – Why Do Projects Fail?. Retrieved from. [online]
Available at: http://calleam.com/WTPF/?p=3501 [Accessed 15 Mar. 2017].
Growth and Transformation Plan II. (2016). [ebook] Addis Ababa: National Planning
Commission, pp.38-39. Available at: http://www.mofed.gov.et/ [Accessed 12 Jan. 2017].
Harrison, F. and Lock, D. (2004). Advanced Project management. 4th ed.
Heagney, J. (2012). Fundamentals of project management. 4th ed.
Hedman, J. and Lind, M. (2009). Is There Only One Systems Development Life Cycle?.
Herbst,, F. and Coldwell, D. (2004). Business Research. Cape Town: Juta and Co Ltd, pp.13-15.
ITS Africa (2014). Current ICT Initiatives and projects. [eBook] ITS Africa. Available at:
http://www.ist-africa.org/home/default.asp?page=doc-by-id-print&docid=8217& [Accessed
12 Apr. 2017].
ITU (2016). Measuring the Information Society Report 2016. [eBook] Geneva Switzerland:
International Telecommunication Union, pp.64-74. Available at:
http://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/idi/2016/ [Accessed 29 Mar. 2017].
Kerzne, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and
Controlling. 10th ed. New Jersey: John Wileys &Sons. Inc.
Kothari, C. (1985). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. Willey Eastern Limited.
Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. 2nd ed. New Delhi: New
Age International (P) Ltd.
Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. 2nd ed.
Lock, D. (2007). Project management. 9th ed. Hampshire GU11 3HR: Gower Publishing
Limited, pp.5-10.
Marchewka, J. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. 5th ed. p.24.
Mellor, S. (2005). Adapting agile approaches to your project needs. Ieee Software, [online] 22(3),
pp.17-20. Available at:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1953/b17ea41a2795664e19159ce168b5b140c900.pdf
[Accessed 17 Mar. 2017].
MGARCA (2012). Norwegian eGovernment Program. Ministry of Government Administration,
53
Reform and Church Affairs.
Mutajwaa, P. and Rwelamila, D. (2007). Project management competence in public sector
infrastructure organizations. Construction Management and Economics, 25(1), pp.56-57.
PMI (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. 4th ed. Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania 19073-3299 USA: Project Management Institute, Inc., p.5.
PMI (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 5th ed.
PMI (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. 5th ed. Project
Management Institute.
PMI (2014). The Project Management Office: Aligning Strategy & Implementation. [eBook]
Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA: Project Management Institute. Available at:
http://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/white-papers/pmo-strategy-
implement.pdf [Accessed 2 Mar. 2017].
Schwable, K. (2014). (2014): Information Technology Project Management. 7th ed.
Schwalbe, K. (2011). 6th ed. Boston: Joe Sabatino.
Skogmar, K. (2015). PRINCE2, the PMBOK Guide and ISO 21500. [eBook] Available at:
https://www.axelos.com/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?guid=4bf6bd26-2805-4b7f-8cba-
c56a899eb871 [Accessed 6 Apr. 2017].
Stackpole, C. (2010). S : A user manual to the PMBOK Guide:2010.
Stoicaa, R. and Brouse, P. (2013). IT project failure: A proposed four-phased adaptive multi-
method approach. Procedia Computer Science, [online] 16. Available at: https://ai2-s2-
pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com/0b96/5422eb1fcc06e4274373c14b5956094e105e.pdf [Accessed 17
Jan. 2017].
The National Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Policy and Strategy. (2016).
[eBook] FDRE, p.25. Available at: http://www.mcit.gov.et/web/english/the-national-ict-
policy [Accessed 7 Mar. 2017].
Unab, W. and Kundi, M. (2014). Review of Project Management (PM) Practices in Public
Infrastructure Development Organizations of Pakistan. JOURNAL OF STRATEGY &
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2(4), pp.144-158.
Van der Veen, R. (2015). Project Management in E-Government Projects: Lessons for the Dutch
Government. [eBook] Enschede: University of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering,
Mathematics and Computer Science. Available at:
http://referaat.cs.utwente.nl/conference/23/paper/7510/project-management-in-e-
government-projects-lessons-for-the-dutch-government.pdf [Accessed 2 Apr. 2017].
Weisberg, H. (2005). The total survey error approach: a guide to the new science of survey
research. London: The University of Chicago Press, Ltd.
54
Whitten, J. and Bentley, L. (2007). SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHODS. 7th ed. New
York: McGraw, pp.13-35.
World Bank Group (2003). World Bank. ICT and MDGs: a World Bank Group Perspective. ..
[eBook] Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at:
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/538451468762925037/ICT-and-MDGs-a-World-
Bank-Group-Perspective [Accessed 27 Mar. 2017].
55
St. Mary University
College of Graduate Studies
MBA in Project management
Dear Participant
Thank you
Solomon Assefa
Tel. 0911 413307
56
6 Appendix I
Survey question
1- Your Education:
BA Master Other
4- Age:
57
NO Project management PMBOK process Never Sometimes Mostly Always
group
Project Charters (a document that formally
authorizes a project and describes initial
1. requirements that satisfy stakeholder need &
Expectations) are developed.
2. Stakeholder Register & Stakeholder
Management Strategy is prepared.
B. Project Planning Process Group
3. Project Management Plans (which documents
the actions to define, prepare, integrate, and
coordinate all subsidiary plans) are prepared.
4. Project schedule, Schedule Base lines &
Schedule data is generated.
5. Cost Estimates, Cost Performance Baseline and
Project Funding requirements are generated.
6. Quality requirements and Standards are
identified and compliance strategies are
documented.
7. Quality Management Plan, Quality Matrices,
Quality Checklists and Process Improvement
Plans are Prepared.
8. Human Resource Plan are (which identifies &
documents the project roles, responsibilities,
required skills, reporting relationships and staff
management plan) are developed
9. Communications Management Plans (which
documents stakeholder information needs and
defines communication approach) are
developed.
10. Risk Management strategy is defined, risks are
identified, qualitative & quantitative risk
analysis is performed and actions to enhance
opportunities and reduce threats are developed.
11. Risk Management Plans, Risk Register & Risk
58
NO Project management PMBOK process Never Sometimes Mostly Always
group
related contract decisions are prepared.
59
NO Project management PMBOK process Never Sometimes Mostly Always
group
24. Quality activities are monitored and results are
recorded to assess performance and to
recommend necessary changes.
25. Performance Information like status reports,
progress measurements and forecasts are
collected and distributed.
26. Risk response plans are implemented, identified
risks are tracked, residual risks are monitored,
new risks are identified and risk process
effectiveness is evaluated.
E. Project Closing Process Group
60
7 APPENDIX II
61