Manual

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education
12
Manual for Autonomous Colleges
PREFACE
It is heartening that the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) has
brought in new spirit into its process of Assessment and Accreditation (A&A). This has
been attempted as a continuance of the NAAC‟s concern for ensuring that its processes
are in tune with local, regional and global changes in higher education scenario and in
particular NEP-2020. The current process of A&A is being adopted from July 2017. The
main focus of the revision process has been to enhance the redeeming features of the
accreditation process and make them more robust, objective, transparent and scalable as
well as make it ICT enabled.
Considering feedback from the stakeholders NAAC has simplified the Manual and also
decided to disclose the benchmarks. Based on the feedback from the stakeholders and
inputs from the experts from the Autonomous Colleges/Universities/Institutions, the
present simplified Manual has been prepared following the current A&A framework.
The contribution of the experts and the officials of NAAC in the development of this
manual would no doubt go a long way in making the entire process of A&A more
effective and efficient. The services of all the experts are gratefully acknowledged.
The Autonomous Colleges of seeking accreditation from now on will need to understand
the changes made in the Manual. In an effort to enhance the accountability of the
accrediting agency as well as the institutions applying for accreditation, it is advised to
look into the latest developments on the website of NAAC.
I deem it a privilege to acknowledge the immense contribution made by the team of

NAAC in the development of the Manuals for the A&A process of Autonomous
Colleges.
21st December 2022 (S. C. Sharma)

Bengaluru Director, NAAC
2
CONTENTS Page No.
Preface 2
SECTION A: Guidelines for Assessment and Accreditation
I. Introduction 5
Vision and Mission 5
Core Values 6
II. Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions 8
Revised Assessment and Accreditation (A&A) Framework 8
Focus of Assessment 9
III. Quality Indicator Framework (QIF) - Description 9
IV. Eligibility for Assessment and Accreditation by NAAC 22
V. The Assessment Process 23
VI. Procedural Details 26
VII. Assessment Outcome 28
Calculation of Institutional CGPA 29
VIII. Mechanism for Institutional Appeals 30
IX. Re-Assessment 31
X. Subsequent Cycles of Accreditation 31
XI. Fee Structure and other Financial Implications 32
XII. Getting Ready for Submission of Self - Study Report (SSR) 36
XIII. Mandatory Disclosure on HEI‟s Website 37
SECTION B: Data Requirements for Self - Study Report (SSR)

1. Executive Summary 39
2. Profile of the Autonomous College 40
3. Extended Profile of the AutonomousCollege 52
4. Quality Indicator Framework (QIF) 53
5. Evaluative report of the Departments 95
SECTION C: Appendices
1. Appendix 1: Glossary and Notes 99
2. Appendix 2: Abbreviations 111
3
SECTION A: GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT AND
ACCREDITATION
This Section presents the NAAC framework for Assessment and

Accreditation based on the Core Values and Criteria for assessment
and Key Indicators. Further, it details out the procedures for
institutional preparation for filling the Self Study Report online, Peer
Assessment and the final Outcome of Accreditation. The procedure for
re-assessment, mechanism for institutional appeals and accreditation
of subsequent cycles are also presented.
4
I. INTRODUCTION
India has one of the largest and diverse education systems in the world. Privatization,
widespread expansion, increased autonomy and introduction of Programmes in new and
emerging areas have improved access to higher education. At the same time, it has also led to
widespread concern on the quality and relevance of the higher education. To address these
concerns, the National Policy on Education (NPE, 1986) and the Programme of Action (PoA,
1992) spelt out strategic plans for the policies, advocated the establishment of an independent
National accreditation agency. Consequently, the National Assessment and Accreditation
Council (NAAC) was established in 1994 as an autonomous institution of the University Grants
Commission (UGC) with its Head Quarter in Bengaluru. The mandate of NAAC as reflected in
its vision statement is in making quality assurance an integral part of the functioning of Higher
Education Institutions (HEIs).
The NAAC functions through its General Council (GC) and Executive Committee (EC)
comprising educational administrators, policy makers and senior academicians from a cross-
section of Indian higher education system. The Chairperson of the UGC is the President of the
GC of the NAAC, the Chairperson of the EC is an eminent academician nominated by the
President of GC (NAAC). The Director is the academic and administrative head of NAAC and is
the member-secretary of both the GC and the EC. In addition to the statutory bodies that steer its
policies and core staff to support its activities NAAC is advised by the advisory and consultative
committees constituted from time to time.
Vision and Mission
The vision of NAAC is:
To make quality the defining element of higher education in India through a combination of self
and external quality evaluation, promotion and sustenance initiatives.
The mission statements of the NAAC aim at translating the NAAC‟s vision into action plans
and define NAAC‟s engagement and endeavor as given below:
 To arrange for periodic assessment and accreditation of institutions of higher

education or units thereof, or specific academic programmes or projects;
 To stimulate the academic environment for promotion of quality in teaching-learning
and research in higher education institutions;
 To encourage self-evaluation, accountability, autonomy and innovations in higher
education;
 To undertake quality-related research studies, consultancy and training programmes,
and
 To collaborate with other stakeholders of higher education for quality
evaluation, promotion and sustenance.
5
Striving to achieve its goals as guided by its vision and mission statements, NAAC primarily
focuses on assessment of the quality of higher education institutions in the country. The NAAC
methodology for Assessment and Accreditation is very much similar to that followed by Quality
Assurance (QA) agencies across the world and consists of self-assessment by the institution
along with external peer assessment organized by NAAC.
Core Values
Throughout the world, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) function in a dynamic

environment. The need to expand the system of higher education, the impact of technology on the
educational delivery, the increasing private participation in higher education and the impact of
globalization (including liberal cross-border and trans-national educational imperatives), have
necessitated marked changes in the Indian higher education system. These changes and the
consequent shift in values have been taken into cognizance by NAAC while formulating the core
values. Accordingly, in order to ensure external and internal validity and credibility, the QA
process of NAAC is grounded within a value framework which is suitable and appropriate to the
National context.
The accreditation framework of NAAC is thus based on five core values detailed below.
(i) Contributing to National Development
Most of the HEIs have a remarkable capacity to adapt to changes and at the same time,
pursue the goals and objectives that they have set forth for themselves. Contributing to national
development has always been an implicit goal of Indian HEIs. The role of HEIs is significant in
human resource development and capacity building of individuals, to cater to the needs of the
economy, society and the country as a whole, thereby, contributing to the development of the
Nation. Serving the cause of social justice, ensuring equity and increasing access to higher
education are a few ways by which HEIs can contribute to the national development. It is
therefore appropriate that the Assessment and Accreditation (A&A) process of NAAC looks into
the ways HEIs have been responding to and contributing towards national development.
(ii) Fostering Global Competencies among Students
The spiraling developments at the global level also warrant that the NAAC includes in its
scope of assessment skill development of students, on par with their counterparts elsewhere in the
world. With liberalization and globalization of economic activities, the need to develop skilled
human resources of a high caliber is imperative. Consequently, the demand for internationally
acceptable standards in higher education is evident. Therefore, the accreditation process of
NAAC needs to examine the role of HEIs in preparing the students to achieve core competencies,
to face the global challenges successfully. This requires that the HEIs be innovative, creative
andentrepreneurial in their approach. Towards achieving this, HEIs may establish collaborations
with industries, network with the neighborhood agencies/bodies and foster a closer relationship
between the “world of competent-learning” and the “world of skilled work”.
6
(iii) Inculcating a Value System among Students
Although skill development is crucial to the success of students in the job market, skills
are of less value in the absence of appropriate value systems. The HEIs have to shoulder the
responsibility of inculcating desirable value systems among students. In a country like India, with
cultural pluralities and diversities, it is essential that students imbibe the appropriate values
commensurate with social, cultural, economic and environmental realities, at the local, national
and universal levels. Whatever be the pluralities and diversities that exist in the country, there is a
persisting concern for inculcating the core universal values like truth and righteousness apart
from other values emphasized in the various policy documents of the country. The seeds of
values such as cooperation and mutual understanding during the early stages of education have to
be reiterated and re-emphasized at the higher education also through appropriate learning
experiences and opportunities. The NAAC assessment therefore examines how these essential
and desirable values are being inculcated in the students, by the HEIs.
(iv) Promoting the Use of Technology
Most of the significant developments that one can observe today can be attributed to the
impact of Science and Technology. While the advantages of using modern tools and
technological innovations in the day-to-day-life are well recognized, the corresponding changes
in the use of new technologies, for teaching learning and governance of HEIs, leaves much to be
desired. Technological advancement and innovations in educational transactions have to be
undertaken by all HEIs, to make a visible impact on academic development as well as
administration. At a time when our educational institutions are expected to perform as good as
their global partners, significant technological innovations have to be adopted. Traditional
methods of delivering higher education have become less motivating to a large number of
students. To keep pace with the developments in other spheres of human endeavor, HEIs have to
enrich the learning experiences of their students by providing them with state-of-the-art
educational technologies. The campus community must be adequately prepared to make use of
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) optimally. Conscious effort is also needed to
invest in hardware and to orient the faculty suitably.
In addition to using technology as a learning resource, managing the activities of the

institution in a technology-enabled way will ensure effective institutional functioning. For
example, documentation and data management in the HEIs are areas where the process of
assessment by NAAC has made a significant impact. Moving towards electronic data
management and having institutional website to provide ready and relevant information to
stakeholders are desirable steps in this direction. In other words, effective use of ICT in HEIs will
be able to provide ICT literacy to the campus community, using ICT for resource sharing and
networking, as well as adoptingICT-enabled administrative processes. Therefore, NAAC
accreditation would look at how the HEIs have put in place their electronic data management
systems and electronic resources and their access to internal and external stakeholders
particularly the student community.
7
(v) Quest for Excellence
Contributing to nation-building and skills development of students, HEIs should

demonstrate a drive to develop themselves into centres of excellence. Excellence in all that they
will contribute to the overall development of the system of higher education of the country as a
whole. This „Quest for Excellence‟ could start with the assessment or even earlier, by the
establishment of the Steering Committee for the preparation of the Self - Study Report (SSR) of
an institution. Another step in this direction could be the identification of the strengths and
weaknesses in the teaching and learning processes as carried out by the institution.
The five core values as outlined above form the foundation for assessment of institutions
that volunteer for accreditation by NAAC. The HEIs may also add their own core values to these
in conformity with the goals and mission.
II. ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
The NAAC has been carrying out the process of quality assessment and accreditation of
HEIs over the past two decades. Several HEIs have gone through this process and a sizeable
number has also undergone subsequent cycles of accreditation. True to its commitment for
promoting quality culture in HEIs in consonance with the overall developments in the field of
education as well as the outside world, NAAC has strived to be sensitive to these and adequately
reflect these in its processes. The A&A process of NAAC continue to be an exercise in
partnership of NAAC with the HEI being assessed. As is known by now, the A&A process of
NAAC is being revised and this revision attempts to enhance such a partnership. Over years the
feedback procured from the HEIs, other stakeholders and the developments in the national scene
– all have contributed in making appropriate revisions in the process so as to accelerate the
process with greater quality rigor.
Revised Assessment and Accreditation(A&A)Framework
The Revised Assessment and Accreditation Framework was launched in July 2017. It
represents an explicit Paradigm Shift making it ICT enabled, objective, transparent, scalable and
robust. The Shift is:
from qualitative peer judgement to data based quantitative indicator evaluation with
increased objectivity and transparency
towards extensive use of ICT confirming scalability and robustness
in terms of simplification of the process drastic reduction in number of questions, size of
the report, visit days, and so on
in terms of boosting benchmarking as quality improvement tool. This has been attempted
through comparison of NAAC indicators with other international QA frameworks
introducing Pre-qualifier for peer team visit, as 25% of system generated score
IntroducingSystem Generated Scores (SGS) with combination of online evaluation of
Quantitative metrics and peer judgement of Qualitative metrics
in introducing the element of third party validation of data
in providing appropriate differences in the metrics, weightages and benchmarks to
universities, autonomous colleges and affiliated/constituent colleges
8
in revising several metrics to bring in enhanced participation of students and alumni in the
assessment process
Focus of Assessment
The NAAC continues with its focus on quality culture of the institution in terms of
Quality Initiatives, Quality Sustenance and Quality Enhancement, as reflected in its vision,
organization, operations and the processes. Experience has reiterated that these can be ascertained
either by on site observations and/or through the facts and figures about the various aspects of
institutional functioning. The Revised Manual places greater confidence in the latter as reflective
of internal institutional processes.
In line with NAAC‟s conviction that quality concerns are institutional, Quality
Assessment (QA) can better be done through self-evaluation. The self-evaluation process and the
subsequent preparation of the Self Study Report (SSR) to be submitted to NAAC involves the
participation of all the stakeholders – management, faculty members, administrative staff,
students, parents, employers, community and alumni. While the participation of internal
stakeholders i.e. management, staff and students provide credibility and ownership to the activity
and could lead to newer initiatives, interaction with the external stakeholders facilitate the
development process of the institution and their educational services. Overall, the QA is expected
to serve as a catalyst for institutional self-improvement, promote innovation and strengthen the
urge to excel.
It is attempted to enlarge the digital coverage of the entire process of A&A. This, it is
believed, will not only accelerate the process but also bring in greater objectivity into the process.
The possible differentiation required in respect of HEIs which are going for subsequent
cycles of A&A, appropriate scope has been provided in the process. This will allow the HEIs to
appropriately represent the developments they have attempted after the previous A&A cycle.
III. QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF) - DESCRIPTION

The criteria based assessment forms the backbone of A&A process of NAAC. The seven criteria
represent the core functions and activities of a HEI. In the revised framework not only the
academic and administrative aspects of institutional functioning but also the emerging issues have
been included. The seven Criteria to serve as basis for assessment of HEIs are:
1. Curricular Aspects
2. Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
3. Research, Innovations and Extension
4. Infrastructure and Learning Resources
5. Student Support and Progression
6. Governance, Leadership and Management
7. Institutional Values and Best Practices
9
Under each Criterion a few Key Indicators are identified. These Key Indicators (KIs) are further
delineated as Metrics which actually elicit responses from the HEIs. These seven criteria along
with their KIs are given below explicating the aspects they represent.
Criterion I: - Curricular Aspects
The Curricular Aspects are the mainstay of any educational institution. However, the
responsibilities of various HEIs in this regard vary depending on their administrative standing.
That is, an Affiliated College is essentially a teaching unit which depends on a larger body
namely university for legitimizing its academic and administrative processes. Its engagement
with curricular aspects is mainly in their implementation while its participation in curriculum
development, procedural detailing, assessment procedures as well as certification is peripheral
and these are “givens‟‟. Whereas a University has the mandate to visualize appropriate curricula
for particular programmes, revise/update them periodically; ensure that the outcomes of its
programmes are defined by its bodies. In case of Autonomous Colleges curricular responsibilities
are similar to the Universities.
Criterion I pertains to the practices of an institution in initiating a wide range of

programme options and courses that are in tune with the emerging national and global trends and
relevant to the local needs. Apart from issues of diversity and academic flexibility, aspects on
career orientation, multi-skill development, feedback system and involvement of stakeholders in
curriculum updating are also gauged.
The focus of Criterion I is captured in the following Key Indicators:
KEY INDICATORS
1.1*(U) -Curriculum Design and Development

1.1*(A) - Curriculum Planning and Implementation
1.2 Academic Flexibility
1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
1.4 Feedback System
*(U) - applicable only for Universities and Autonomous Colleges

*(A) - applicable only for the Affiliated/Constituent Colleges
10
1.1 *(U) Curriculum Design and Development
One of the significant responsibilities of Universities and Autonomous Colleges is

Curriculum Design and Development and thus are expected to have processes, systems
and structures in place to shoulder this responsibility. Curriculum Design and
Development is a complex process of developing appropriate need-based inputs in
consultation with expert groups, based on the feedback from stakeholders. This results in
the development of relevant programmes with flexibility to suit the professional and
personal needs of the students and realization of core values. The Key Indicator (KI) also
considers the good practices of the institution in initiating a range of programme options
and courses that are relevant to the local needs and in tune with the emerging national and
global trends.
Curriculum evolved by the University/Autonomous College comprises Programme

Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs), the substantive outlines of courses in every
discipline (syllabus), organizational details of implementation as well as assessment of
student performance and thereby attainment of COs. The quality element is reflected in
the efforts to revise, update, include emerging concerns etc., the University/Autonomous
College makes in this regard. The Curriculum designed by University/Autonomous
College may also focus on employability, entrepreneurship and skill development. The
POs, COs could be uploaded on Institutional website.
1.1 *(A) Curricular Planning and Implementation

The Affiliating/Constituent Colleges have rather insignificant role in curriculum
designing and development. They adopt the curriculum overview provided by the
respective universities. Each college operationalize the curriculum within the overall
frame work provided, in one‟s own way depending on its resource potential, institutional
goals and concern and so on. That is, each college visualizes the way the curriculum has
to be carried out – activities, who, how, when etc. This process makes each institution
unique and reflects on the concern of the college for quality in the form of values
emphasized, sensitivities focused on, etc.
1.2 Academic Flexibility
Academic flexibility refers to the freedom in the use of the time-frame of the
courses, horizontal mobility, inter-disciplinary options and others facilitated by curricular
transactions. Supplementary enrichment programmes introduced as an initiative of the
college, credit system and choice offered in the curriculum, in terms of programme,
curricular transactions and time-frame options are also considered in this key indicator.
11
1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
Holistic development of students is the main purpose of curriculum. While this is

attempted through prescribing dynamic and updated curricular inputs, the HEI is expected
to have provision for added courses and activities which may not be directly linked with
one‟s discipline of study but contribute to sensitizing students to cross-cutting issues
relevant to the current pressing concerns both nationally and internationally such as
gender, environment and sustainability, human values and professional ethics,
development of creative and divergent competencies. A progressive university would
provide a wide range of such “value-added‟‟ courses for students to choose from
according to their interests and inclinations.
1.4 Feedback System
The process of revision and redesign of curricula is based on recent developments

and feedback from the stakeholders. The feedback from all stakeholders in terms of its
relevance and appropriateness in catering to the needs of the society, economy and
environment helps in improving the inputs.
A HEI with the feedback system in place will have an active process of not only
collecting feedback from all stakeholders, but also analysing it and identifying and
drawing pertinent pointers to enhance the learning effectiveness.
Criterion II: - Teaching Learning and Evaluation
Criterion II pertains to the efforts of an institution to serve students of different

backgrounds and abilities, through effective teaching-learning experiences. Interactive
instructional techniques that engage students in higher order „thinking‟ and investigation,
through the use of interviews, focused group discussions, debates, projects, presentations,
experiments, practicum, internship and application of ICT resources are important
considerations. It also probes into the adequacy, competence as well as the continuous
professional development of the faculty who handle the programmes of study. The
efficiency of the techniques used to continuously evaluate the performance of teachers
and students is also a major concern of this Criterion.
The focus of Criterion II is captured in the following Key Indicators:
KEY INDICATORS
2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
12
2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
The process of admitting students to the programmes is through a transparent,

well-administered mechanism, complying with all the norms of the concerned
regulatory/governing agencies including state and central governments. Apart from the
compliance to the various regulations the institution put forth its efforts in ensuring equity
and wide access having representation of student community from different geographical
areas and socio-economic, cultural and educational backgrounds. These will be reflected
in the student profile.
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
The HEIs are expected to satisfy the needs of the students from diverse
backgrounds including backward community as well as from different locales. They
would make special efforts to bring in students from special categories, reach out to their
special learning needs by initial assessment of their learning levels, in addition to
understand possible variations over years and how and what is done to deal with such
students. While in uni-gender institutions explicit efforts are to be made to sensitise
students about the other gender; and the like.
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process
Diversity of learners in respect of their background, abilities and other personal

attributes will influence the extent of their learning. The teaching-learning modalities of
the institution are rendered to be relevant for the learner group. The learner-centered
education through appropriate methodologies such as participative learning, experiential
learning and collaborative learning modes, facilitate effective learning. Teachers provide
a variety of learning experiences, including individual and collaborative learning.
Interactive and participatory approaches, if employed, create a feeling of responsibility
inlearners and makes learning a process of construction of knowledge. Of late, digital
resources for learning have become available and this makes learning more
individualised, creative and dynamic. Quality of learning provided in the institution
depends largely on teacher readiness to draw upon such recently available technology
supports and also the initiative to develop such learning resources to enrich teaching-
learning; on teacher‟s familiarity with Learning Management Systems (LMSs), other e-
resources available and how to meaningfully incorporate them in one‟s scheme of
teaching-learning.
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
“Teacher quality” is a composite term to indicate the quality of teachers in terms of

their qualification, teacher characteristics, adequacy of recruitment procedures, faculty
availability, professional development and recognition of teaching abilities. Teachers take
initiative to learn and keep abreast with the latest developments, to innovate, continuously
seek improvement in their work and strive for individual and institutional excellence.
13
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
This Key Indicator looks at issues related to assessment of teaching, learning and
evaluative processes and reforms, to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the system.
One of the purposes of evaluation is to provide development-inducing feedback. The
qualitative dimension of evaluation is in its use for enhancing the competence of students.
Innovative evaluation process is to gauge the knowledge and skills acquired at various
levels of the programmes.
These specifications are stated as COs. The quality of assessment process in a HEI
depends on how well the examination system actually tests the COs, quality of questions,
extent of transparency in the system, extent of development inducing feedback system,
regularity in the conduct of examinations and declaration of results as well as the regulatory
mechanisms for prompt action on possible errors.
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
The real test of the extent to which teaching learning has been effective in a HEI is
reflected in the student performance in the examinations. Student performance is seen as the
realization of learning outcomes which are specifications of what a student should be
capable of doing on successful completion of a course and/or a programme.
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
All the efforts of teachers and the institution to make learning a meaningful
process can be considered impactful only to the extent students perceive it to be
meaningful. Their satisfaction level is decided by the kinds of experiences they undergo,
the extent of the “comfort” feeling as well as intellectual stimulation the learning
situations provide. Their feedback significantly showcases the actual quality of teaching
learning process enabling identification of the strengths of teaching as well as the possible
improvements. Student satisfaction, thus, is a direct indicator of the effectiveness of
teaching learning in the institution. It may be impractical to capture this aspect from every
student; however, every HEI can resort to a sample survey on a formalized basis to
capture this significant feature. This is the reason the revised assessment framework of
NAAC adopts survey of student satisfaction.
Criterion III: - Research, Innovations and Extension
This Criterion seeks information on the policies, practices and outcomes of the
institution, with reference to research, innovations and extension. It deals with the
facilities provided and efforts made by the institution to promote a „research culture‟. The
institution has the responsibility to enable faculty to undertake research projects useful to
the society. Serving the community through extension, which is a social responsibility
and a core value to be demonstrated by institutions, is also a major aspect of this
Criterion.
14
The focus of Criterion III is captured in the following Key Indicators:
KEY INDICATORS
3.1 *Promotion of Research and Facilities
3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research
3.3 Innovation Ecosystem
3.4 Research Publications and Awards
3.5 *Consultancy
3.6 Extension Activities
3.7 Collaboration
*Not Applicable to Affiliated Colleges
3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities
The promotion of research is a significant responsibility of the HEIs particularly for

Universities without which a „research culture‟ on campus cannot be realised. The HEIs have to
be actively engaged in this through evolving appropriate policies and practices, making adequate
resources available, encouraging active research involvement of teachers and scholars in research
as well as recognizing any achievement of teachers through research. It also includes
responsiveness and administrative supportiveness (procedural flexibility) in the institution in
utilizing the supports and resources available at the Government agencies and/or other agencies.
Required infrastructure in terms of space and equipment and support facilities are made available
on the campus for undertaking research. The institution collaborates with other agencies,
institutions, research bodies for sharing research facilities and undertaking collaborative research.
3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research
The institution provides support in terms of financial, academic and human resources
required and timely administrative decisions to enable faculty to submit project proposals and
approach funding agencies for mobilizing resources for research. The institutional support to its
faculty for submitting research projects and securing external funding through flexibility in
administrative processes and infrastructure and academic support are crucial for any institution to
excel in research. The faculties are empowered to take up research activities utilizing the existing
facilities. The institution encourages its staff to engage in interdisciplinary and interdepartmental
research activities and resource sharing.
3.3 Innovation Ecosystem
The Institution has created an ecosystem for innovation including incubation centre and
other initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge. The institution conducts
workshop/seminars on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Industry-Academia Innovative
practices. Awards for innovation won by institution/teachers/research scholars/students, start-ups
incubated on-campus are explicitly commended by the institution.
15
3.4 Research Publications and Awards
Exploration and reflection are crucial for any teacher to be effective in one‟s job. Quality
research outcome is beneficial for the discipline, society, industry, region and the nation. Sharing
of knowledge especially theoretical and practical findings of research through various media
enhances quality of teaching and learning. Research acumen in an institution is an evolving
feature reflecting various research output with clear records such as - doctoral, post-doctoral,
projects, inventions and discoveries, number of patents obtained and number of research
publications.
3.5 Consultancy
Activity organized or managed by the faculty for an external agency for which the
expertise and the specific knowledge base of the faculty becomes the major input. The finances
generated through consultancy are fairly utilized by the institution. The faculty taking up
consultancy is properly rewarded. University is a resource pool with several persons engaged in
research at various levels. Consultancy shows the credibility of the university‟s research acumen
in the outside world. While the university personnel extend their expertise to other agencies the
university also generates some revenue along with the research faculty. For this it is necessary
that the university has a formalized policy on consultancy with clear specification of revenue
sharing between the teacher and the institution. This may not be a formalized aspect of a college.
3.6 Extension Activities
Learning activities have a visible element for developing sensitivities towards community
issues, gender disparities, social inequity etc. and in inculcating values and commitment to
society. Affiliation and interaction with groups or individuals who have an interest in the
activities of the institution and the ability to influence the actions, decisions, policies, practices or
goals of the organization leads to mutual benefit to both the parties. The processes and strategies
inherent in such activities relevantly sensitize students to the social issues and contexts.
Sustainable practices of the institution leading to superior performance results in successful
outcomes in terms of generating knowledge useful for the learner as well as the community.
Extension also is the aspect of education which emphasizes community services. These
are often integrated with curricula as extended opportunities, intended to help, serve, reflect and
learn. The curriculum-extension interface has an educational value, especially in rural India.
3.7 Collaboration
Through collaboration the HEIs can maintain a closer contact with the work field. It helps
keep the academic activities in the HEI in a more realistic perspective and also expand the scope
of learning experiences to students. Collaboration can be sought with academic institutions or
industry or other agencies of professional and social relevance. The range of activities could
include training, student exchange, faculty exchange, research and resource sharing, among
others. For making collaborative endeavor impactful it is necessary there is a formal agreement or
understanding between the institution and other HEIs or agencies for such activities.
16
Criterion IV: - Infrastructure and Learning Resources
The adequacy and optimal use of the facilities available in an institution are essential to
maintain the quality of academic and other programmes on the campus. It also requires
information on how every constituent of the institution - students, teachers and staff - benefit
from these facilities. Expansion of facilities to meet future development is included among other
concerns.
The focus of Criterion IV is captured in the following Key Indicators:
KEY INDICATORS
4.1 Physical Facilities

4.2 Library as a Learning Resource
4.3 IT Infrastructure
4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
4.1 Physical Facilities
Adequate infrastructure facilities are keys for effective and efficient conduct of the
educational programmes. The growth of infrastructure thus has to keep pace with the academic
developments in the institution. The other supportive facilities on the campus are developed to
contribute to the effective ambience for curricular, extra- curricular and administrative activities.
A provision of expenditure in the budget is made annually for maintenance and replenishment of
physical facilities which will ensure their availability on a continual basis.
4.2 Library as a Learning Resource
The library holdings in terms of books, journals and other learning materials and
technology-aided learning mechanisms which enable students to acquire information, knowledge
and skills required for their study programmes. A recent development in the field due to
availability of digital means, the functioning of the library has undergone a drastic change.
Automation of library using the ILMS, use of e-journals and books, providing remote access to e-
resources in the library have become a matter of necessity. Providing for these and such other
developments as well as utilizing them well are important indicators of the quality of an academic
institution.
4.3 IT Infrastructure
The institution adopts policies and strategies for adequate technology deployment and
maintenance. The ICT facilities and other learning resources are adequately available in the
institution for academic and administrative purposes. The staff and students have access
totechnology and information retrieval on current and relevant issues. The institution deploys and
employs ICTs for a range of activities.
17
4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
Having adequate infrastructure is not enough for effective institutional functioning, but
regular maintenance and periodic replenishment of infrastructure is essential. It is necessary that
the institution has sufficient resources allocated for regular upkeep of the infrastructure and there
are effective mechanisms for the upkeep of the infrastructure facilities; and promote the optimum
use of the same.
Criterion V: - Student Support and Progression
The highlights of this Criterion V are the efforts of an institution to provide necessary
assistance to students, to enable them to acquire meaningful experiences for learning at the
campus and to facilitate their holistic development and progression. It also looks into student
performance and alumni profiles and the progression of students to higher education and gainful
employment.
The focus of Criterion V is captured in the following Key Indicators:
KEY INDICATORS
5.1 Student Support

5.2 Student Progression
5.3 Student Participation and Activities
5.4 Alumni Engagement
5.1 Student Support
Facilitating mechanisms like guidance cell, placement cell, grievance redressal cell and
welfare measures to support students. Specially designed inputs are provided to the needy
students with learning difficulties. Provision is made for bridge and value added courses in
relevant areas. Institution has a well structured, organized guidance and counseling system in
place. Students benefited through scholarships, freeships and other means should be identified by
HEIs.
5.2 Student Progression
The Institution‟s concern for student progression to higher studies and/or to employment
is a pertinent issue. Identify the reasons for poor attainment and plan and implement remedial
measures. Sustainable good practices which effectively support the students facilitate optimal
progression. The institutional provisions facilitate vertical movement of students from one level
of education to the next higher level or towards gainful employment. Student qualifying for
state/national/international level exam or competition should be identified by HEIs.
18
5.3 Student Participation and Activities
The institution promotes inclusive practices for social justice and better stakeholder
relationships. The institution promotes value- based education for inculcating social responsibility
and good citizenry amongst its student community. The institution has the required infrastructure
and promotes active participation of the students in social, cultural and leisure activities.
Encouraging students‟ participation in activities facilitates developing various skills and
competencies and foster holistic development.
5.4 Alumni Engagement
The Alumni are a strong support to the institution. An active Alumni Association can
contribute in academic matters, student support as well as mobilization of resources – both
financial and non financial. The institution nurtures the alumni association/chapters to facilitate
them to contribute significantly to the development of the institution through financial and non-
financial means.
Criterion VI: - Governance, Leadership and Management
Effective functioning of an institution can be gauged by the policies and practices it has
evolved in the matter of planning human resources, recruitment, training, performance appraisal,
financial management and the overall role of leadership.
The focus of Criterion VI is captured in the following Key Indicators:
KEY INDICATOR
6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership

6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS)
6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
Effective leadership by setting values and participative decision- making process is key
not only to achieve the vision, mission and goals of the institution but also in building the
organizational culture. The formal and informal arrangements in the institution to co-ordinate the
academic and administrative planning and implementation reflects the institutions efforts in
achieving its vision.
6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
The leadership provides clear vision and mission to the institution. The functions of the
institution and its academic and administrative units are governed by the principles of
participation and transparency. Formulation of development objectives, directives and guidelines
19
with specific plans for implementation by aligning the academic and administrative aspects
improves the overall quality of the institutional provisions.
6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
The process of planning human resources including recruitment, performance appraisal

and planning professional development programmes and seeking appropriate feedback, analysis
of responses and ensure that they form the basis for planning. Efforts are made to upgrade the
professional competence of the staff. There are mechanisms evolved for regular performance
appraisal of staff.
6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
Budgeting and optimum utilization of finance as well as mobilization of resources are the
issues considered under this Key Indicator. There are established procedures and processes for
planning and allocation of financial resources. The institution has developed strategies for
mobilizing resources and ensures transparency in financial management of the institution. The
income and expenditure of the institution are subjected to regular internal and external audit.
6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS)
The internal quality assurance systems of HEIs are Self-regulated responsibilities of the
higher education institutions, aimed at continuous improvement of quality and achieving
academic excellence. The institution has mechanisms for academic and administrative auditing. It
adopts quality management strategies in all academic and administrative aspects. The institution
has an IQAC and adopts a participatory approach in managing its provisions.
Criterion VII: - Institutional Values and Best Practices
An educational institution operates in the context of the larger education system in the
country. In order to be relevant in changing national and global contexts an educational institution
has to be responsive to the emerging challenges and pressing issues. It has a social responsibility
to be proactive in the efforts towards development in the larger contexts. This role of the
institution is reflected in terms of the kinds of programmes, activities and preferences (values)
that it incorporates within its regular functioning. The extent to which an institution is impactful
in this is a sure reflection of its quality.
Every institution has a mandate to be responsive to at least a few pressing issues such as
gender equity, environmental consciousness and sustainability, inclusiveness and professional
ethics, but the way it addresses these and evolves practices will always be unique. Every
institution faces and resolves various kinds of internal pressures and situations while doing this.
Some meaningful practices pertinent to such situations are evolved within the institution and
these help smooth functioning and also lead to enhanced impact. Such practices which are
evolved internally by the institution leading to improvements in any one aspect of its functioning
– academic, administrative or organizational, - are recognized as a “best practices”. Over a period
of time, due to such unique ways of functioning each institution develops distinct characteristic
which becomes its recognizable attribute.
20
The focus of Criterion VII is captured in the following Key Indicators:
KEY INDICATORS
7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities

7.2 Best Practices
7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
The institution organizes gender equity promotion programmes. The institution displays
sensitivity to issues like climate change and environmental issues. It adopts environment friendly
practices and takes necessary actions such as – energy conservation, rain water harvesting, waste
recycling (solid/liquid waste management, e-waste management), carbon neutral, green practices
etc. The institution facilitates the differently abled (Divyangjan friendliness), effective dealing of
location advantages and disadvantages (situatedness), explicit concern for human values and
professional ethics etc. In other words, the concerns for social responsibilities as well as the
values held by the institution are explicit in its regular activities.
7.2 Best Practices
Any practice or practices that the institution has internally evolved and used during the
last few years leading to positive impact on the regular functioning of the institution can be
identified as “best practice/s”. These are not any activity prescribed by some authority. At some
point in time the institution evolves some innovation or a change in some aspect of functioning.
This practice is relevant mainly within the institution at a given point in time. It could be in
respect of teaching learning, office practices, maintenance and up keep of things or dealing with
human beings or money matters. But adopting that practice has resolved the difficulty or has
brought in greater ease in working in that aspect. In brief, these „best practices’ are relevant
within the institutional context and may pertain to either academic or administrative or
organizational aspects of institutional functioning.
7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
Every institution would like to be recognized for certain of its attributes which make it
„distinct‟, or, one of its kinds. Such attributes characterize the institution and are reflected in all
its activities in focus and practice.
21
IV. ELIGIBILITY FOR ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION BY NAAC
Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), if they have a record of at least two batches of students
graduated or been in existence for six years, whichever is earlier, are eligible to apply for the
process of Assessment and Accreditation (A&A) of NAAC, and fulfil the other conditions or are
covered by the other provisions, if any, mentioned below:
1. Universities (Central/State/Private/Deemed-to-be) and Institutions of National
Importance
a. Provided the Institutions /Deemed –to-be Universities and their off-campuses if
any are approved by MHRD/UGC. NAAC will not consider the unapproved
off-campuses for A&A.
b. Provided that these institutions have regular students enrolled in to the full time
teaching and Research programmes offered on campus.
c. Provided further that the duly established campuses within the country, if any,
shall be treated as part of the Universities / Institutions of National Importance
for the A&A process.
2. Autonomous colleges/Constituent Colleges/ Affiliated Colleges (affiliated to universities

recognized by UGC as an affiliating University)
a) Provided the Colleges are affiliated to a University recognized by UGC for the
purposes of affiliation. Constituent colleges of a Private and Deemed- to-be
Universities are considered as the constituent units of the University and thus will
not be considered for A&A independently. Such constituent colleges need to come
along with the University.
b) Provided the colleges/institutions not affiliated to a University are offering

programmes recognized by Statutory Professional Regulatory Councils and have
been recognized by Association of Indian Universities (AIU) or other such
Government agencies concerned, as equivalent to a degree programme of a
University.
3. Accredited HEIs applying for Re-assessment or Subsequent Cycles (Cycle 2, Cycle 3,

Cycle 4….) of Accreditation
a) Institutions, which would like to make an improvement in the accredited status,

may apply for Re-assessment, after a minimum of one year and before three years
of accreditation subject to the fulfillment of other conditions specified by NAAC
from time to time for the purpose.
b) Institutions opting for Subsequent Cycles (Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4….) of
Accreditation can submit the Institutional Information for Quality Assessment
(IIQA), during the last six months of the validity period subject to the fulfillment
of other conditions specified by NAAC from time to time for the purpose.
4. Any other HEIs at the discretion of NAAC.
22
Note:
1. All the institutions intending to apply for Assessment and Accreditation by NAAC need to
mandatorily upload the information on All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) portal.
AISHE code (reference number) is one of the requirements for Registration.
V. THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS
Taking cognizance of the diversity in the kinds of institutions HEIs have been grouped
under three categories namely, Universities, Autonomous Colleges and Affiliated/Constituent
Colleges.
The assessment process will be carried out in three stages. As stated earlier, it will
comprise three main components, viz., Self Study Report (SSR), Student Satisfaction Survey and
the Peer Team Report. The SSR has 84 Metrics for Autonomous Colleges covering the seven
Criteria described earlier. The SSR has two kinds of Metrics: one, those requiring quantifiable
facts and figures as data which have been indicated as „quantitative metrics’ (QnM); and two,
those metrics requiring descriptive responses and are accordingly named „qualitative metrics’
(QlM). Table 1 depicts the distribution of Key Indicators (KIs) and Metrics across them.
Table 1: Distribution of Metrics and KIs across Criteria
Autonomous
Type of HEIs
Colleges
Criteria 7
Key Indicators (KIs) 34
Qualitative Metrics (QlM) 35

Quantitative Metrics
50
(QnM)
Total Metrics (QlM +

85
QnM)
Table 2 gives the details of weightage given to the various Key Indicators and Criteria. In view
of the variations in the institutional emphasis on the KIs among the three categories of HEIs,
weightages have been appropriately demarcated. Each metric is designated a weightage which is
indicated elsewhere in this Manual.
23
Table 2 Distribution of weightages across Key Indicators (KIs)
Autonomous
Criteria Key Indicators (KIs) Colleges
1.Curricular 1.1 Curriculum Design and Development 50

Aspects
1.2 Academic Flexibility 30
1.3 Curriculum Enrichment 50
1.4 Feedback System 20

Total 150
2.Teaching- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile 20
Learningand
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity 30
Evaluation
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process 50
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality 50
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms 50
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes 50
2.7 Student satisfaction Survey 50
Total 300
3. Research, 3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities 20
Innovationsand
Extension 3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research 10
3.3 Innovation Ecosystem 10
3.4 Research Publications and Awards 30
3.5 Consultancy 10
3.6 Extension Activities 50
3.7 Collaboration 20
Total 150
4.Infrastructure 4.1 Physical Facilities 30
andLearning
Resources 4.2 Library as a Learning Resource 20
4.3 IT Infrastructure 30
4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure 20
Total 100
5. Student 5.1 Student Support 30
Support and
5.2 Student Progression 30
Progression
24
5.3 Student Participation and Activities 30

5.4 Alumni Engagement 10
Total 100
6.Governance, 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership 15
Leadership and
Management 6.2StrategyDevelopment and Deployment 10
6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies 30
6.4Financial Management and Resource 15
Mobilization
6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System 30
Total 100
7.Institutional 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities 50
Values and Best 7.2 Best Practices 30
Practices
7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness 20
Total 100
TOTALSCORE 1000
VI. PROCEDURAL DETAILS
HEIs are expected to read the below given details carefully and note the specifications of the
revised process of A&A.
1. Eligible HEIs seeking A&A are required to submit Institutional Information for Quality
Assessment (IIQA) online any time during the year.Duly filled in IIQAs of eligible HEIs
will be accepted by NAAC for further processing and others will be rejected.
2. In case of rejection of IIQA applications specific suggestions would be given to HEIs to
facilitate them to resubmit IIQA. An institution can reapply twice after the first attempt
resulted in rejection. That is, each HEI is permitted three attempts in a year, with a single
fee. After this, it will be considered a fresh application with required fees.
3. After the acceptance of IIQA, the institution will be asked to fill the Self Study Report
(SSR) with the required document to be uploaded in the portal of NAAC website within
45 days. The SSR of the HEI will then be subjected to further process. As preparation of
SSR is a systematic process, so it is suggested that the HEIs should be ready with soft
copy of SSR and related documents well in advance of submitting IIQA. Those
institutions who fail to submit SSR within 45days will have to apply afresh starting from
IIQA & its fees. It is to be noted that the extension for submission of SSR will be possible,
if the request (by raising the issue in Issues Management System (IMS) with proper reason
& proof) is done by the HEI before the expiry of the stipulated time, only in cases of
natural calamities, floods, payment settlement delay, technical problems for a period upto
maximum of 15 days after seeking approval from the Competent Authority. No further
extension will be given in the portal. In all such cases the A&A process gets terminated
25
and IIQA fees paid shall be forfeited and the HEIs have to come afresh by submitting
IIQA with the requisite fees.In any case fees for IIQA will not be refundable.
4. The SSR has to be uploaded as per the format in portal of NAAC. After submission of
SSR on NAAC portal HEI would receive an auto generated link/ID of SSR in their
registered email id. The same SSR in .pdf format should be then uploaded on institutional
website.
5. The SSR has to be submitted only online. HEIs should make necessary preparations with
the required data, documents and/or responses before logging on to the NAAC website for
submission of SSR online. Careful study of the Manual will be of great help in this regard.
6. HEIs are requested to go through the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) available in
Apply Online Tab in NAAC website, before preparation of SSR.
7. As indicated earlier, the SSR comprises both Qualitative and Quantitative metrics. The
Quantitative Metrics (QnM) add up to about 56% and the remaining about 44% are
Qualitative Metrics (QlM).
8. The data submitted on Quantitative Metrics (QnM) will be subjected to validation exercise
with the help of Data Validation and Verification (DVV) process done by NAAC. The
responses to Qualitative Metrics (QlM) will be reviewed by the Peer Team on site only
after the institution clears the Pre-qualifier stage.
9. Any Institution found to be providing wrong information/data during validation and
verification stage will be asked for clarifications. On the basis of clarifications submitted
by the HEIs the data will be again sent for DVV process. The process of Data Validation
and Verification (DVV) by NAAC will be done in not more than 30 days.
10. Pre-qualifier: The Quantitative Metrics (QnM) of SSR will be sent for Data Validation
and Verification (DVV) Process. After DVV process, a DVV deviation report will be
generated. On the basis of the deviation report, the A&A process will proceed further as
per the following conditions:
a) HEI whose Metrics are found to be deviated will be liable for the penalty or legal
action. Their first installment of accreditation fees will also be forfeited, and the name
of such HEI will be sent to statutory authorities for further actions.
b) HEI that clears the DVV process will proceed for Peer Team Visit with a condition of a
Pre-qualifier, that the HEI should score at least 25% in Quantitative Metrics (QnM) as
per the final score after the DVV Process. If the HEI does not clear the Pre-qualifier
stage then they will have to apply afresh by submitting the IIQA and its fees. Such
HEIs are eligible to apply again only after six months from the day of declaration of
Pre-qualification status.
11. After the DVV process, NAAC will intimate the HEI, regarding the status of the pre-
qualification. Only pre-qualified HEIs will enter the next round of assessment to be done
by the Peer Team during their on-site visit. The focus of Peer Team visit will be on the
Qualitative Metrics (QlM).
12. Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS): It will be conducted as per the following conditions:
a) SSS will be conducted simultaneously with DVV process.
b) Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have to strictly upload data of at least 50% of
currently
26
enrolled students as per data template format of excel sheet given in portal.
c) The SSS questionnaire (20 objective & 01 subjective)will be e-mailed to all students
and the following rule will be applied for processing the responses.
i. For colleges – (UG/PG and Autonomous) responses should be received from at
least 10% of the student population or 100, whichever is lesser.
ii. For Universities – 10% of the student population or 500, whichever is lesser.
d) If the response rate is lower than the limits mentioned by NAAC, the metric will not be
taken up for evaluation.
e) SSS will be completed within one month after its initiation.
13. Peer Team visit of the institution should not exceed three months after clearance of Pre-
qualifier stage.
14. Based on the size and scope of academic offerings at the HEIs, the number of days and
experts for onsite visit may vary from 2-3 days with 2-5 expert reviewers visiting the
institutions. The visiting teams‟ role would be very specific in the revised model limited to
Qualitative Metrics (QlM). The teams would play an important role in reviewing the
intangible aspects.
15. NAAC will disclose the details of the Peer Team members only three days before the
scheduled PTV dates. HEIs will not be responsible for Logistics for the Visiting Teams.
Hence forth NAAC will directly take care of all the logistics regarding the Peer Teams
visiting the institutions. All payment towards TA, DA, Honorarium, etc., will be directly
paid by NAAC to the nominated members. There would be no financial transactions
between the Institution and the Peer Team members.
16. The institutions need to add a link in home page of their institutional website for NAAC
records/files viz., SSR, Peer Team Report, AQAR, Certificate of NAAC and Accreditation
documents etc., for easy access by its stakeholders. The said link should be clearly visible/
highlighted (without password).
17. Guidelines for filling up Self-Study Report (SSR):
 Extended profile contains all the questions which are basically the figures of
denominators of the formulas used for calculation of various Metrics values.
 There are Tool Tips at various places in portal, such as Metrics, sub-metrics, upload,
etc. which are given as guidance regarding the sort of data required to be submitted by
the institution. The Tool Tip is denoted in the form of . Institutions are required to
go through the respective Tool Tip thoroughly before filling the data.
 The data filled should contextualize with the related metrics. There is an upload limit
(5 MB) for the documents for various Metrics, if the size of the document exceeds that
limit, Institution may upload the same in their own website without password
protection. The link of the said uploaded document should be given in the portal.
 The data of the students for Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) has to be submitted
concurrently during online submission of SSR.
 Where-so-ever „Asterisk Red mark‟ is indicated in the portal it should be
understood as mandatory requirement.
27
18. Policy to withdraw Accreditation applications by Higher Education Institutions

(HEIs) :HEIs which have submitted their Self Study Reports (SSRs) for any reason does
not complete the A&A process: -
 Will host the information that it has withdrawn / not completed the process on the HEI
website
and the information will be hosted on NAAC website too.
 Will be allowed to apply for A&A only after a period of one year from the date of
submission
of SSR.
 The fees submitted by HEI for Assessment and Accreditation process so far will be
forfeited.
19. Non-compliance of DVV Process: Institutions are given 15 days time to complete the
DVV process, and are supposed to respond within stipulated time during DVV
clarification stage. In unforeseen situations (such as natural calamities, political
disturbances and alike) when the institutions fail to comply with the DVV process, a
further extension of 7 days shall be granted on the basis of decision from Competent
Authority. HEIs which do not comply to the DVV clarification process, assessment and
accreditation process of such institutions will be terminated at the level of DVV
clarification and the fees paid for IIQA and the SSR 1st installment will be forfeited. Such
institutions shall reapply for accreditation after one year from the date of declaration of
decision in Standing Committee (SC) meeting, by submission of IIQA and filling SSR
afresh.
VII. ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
The final result of the Assessment and Accreditation exercise will be an ICT based score, which
is a combination of evaluation of qualitative and quantitative metrics. This will be compiled as a
document comprising three parts.
PART I - Peer Team Report

Section 1: Gives the General Information of the institution and its context.
Section 2: Gives Criterion wise analysis based on peer evaluation of qualitative indicators.
Instead of reporting with bullet points, this will be a qualitative, descriptive
assessmentreport based on the Peer Team‟s critical analysis presenting strengths and
weaknesses ofHEI under each Criterion.
Section 3: Presents an Overall Analysis which includes Institutional Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges.
Section 4: Records Recommendations for Quality Enhancement of the Institution (not
more than 10 major ones).
PART II - Graphical representation based on Quantitative Metrics (QnM)

This part will be a System Generated Quality Profile of the HEI based on statistical
analysis of quantitative indicators in the NAAC‟s QIF (quality indicator framework). Graphical
28
presentation of institutional features would be reflected through synthesis of quantifiable

indicators.
PART III -Institutional Grade Sheet

Contains the Institutional Grade Sheet which is based on qualitative indicators, quantitative
indicators and student satisfaction survey using existing calculation methods but it will be
generated by a software.
The above three parts will together form “NAAC Accreditation Outcome” document. It
is mandatory for the HEIs to display it on their institutional website apart from NAAC
hosting it on its website.
Calculation of Institutional CGPA

The CGPA will be calculated based on the scores obtained from the three sources, viz.,
The System Generated Scores (SGS) of the quantitative metrics, the scores from the qualitative
metrics includes critical appraisal by the Peer Team through on site visitand the scores obtained
on the Student Satisfaction Survey. These will be collated through an automated procedure
based on „benchmarks‟ and assessed on a five point scale, viz., (0, 1, 2, 3 & 4).
The Final Grade

On the basis of the CGPA obtained by the institution in maximum possible score of 4.00,
the final grade is assigned on a seven letter grade. The seven letter grades each aligned to the
seven specific score ranges are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 Institutional Grades and Accreditation Status

Range of Institutional Letter
Cumulative Grade Grade Status
Point Average (CGPA)
3.51-4.00 A++ Accredited
3.26-3.50 A+ Accredited
3.01-3.25 A Accredited
2.76-3.00 B++ Accredited
2.51-2.75 B+ Accredited
2.01-2.50 B Accredited
1.51-2.00 C Accredited
≤ 1.50 D Not Accredited
29
Institutions which secure a CGPA equal to or less than 1.50 are notionally categorized under the
letter grade “D”. Such unqualified institutions will also be intimated and notified by NAAC as
“Assessed and Found not qualified for Accreditation”.
VIII. MECHANISM FOR INSTITUTIONAL APPEALS

The process of assessment and accreditation is viewed as an exercise in partnership done
jointly by the NAAC and the institution being assessed. Every stage of the process is marked by
transparency. The institution is consulted at various stages of the process, planning the visit
schedule, sharing the draft peer team report before the team leaves the campus etc. In spite of
this participatory approach, there may be institutions that might have grievances to be
addressed. Therefore, to provide a review mechanism for institutions who are aggrieved about
the process or its outcome or any other issues related thereof, the NAAC has evolved
Mechanism for Institutional Appeals.
On announcement of the A & A outcome, the institution not satisfied with the accreditation
status may:
1. Submit the Intent for Appeal within 15 days and appeal proforma within 45 days from the
date of declaration of result, through HEI portal.
2. The application for appeal should be submitted along with the requisite non-refundable fee of
Rs. 50,000/- + applicable taxes (GST).
3. An Appeals Committee constituted for the purpose will consider the appeal and make
recommendations to the Executive Committee (EC). The decision of the EC shall be binding
on the institution. Generally, the recommendations may be Re-DVV, Re-Visit, No change,
etc.
4. The clarification process and time lines for Re-DVV is same as DVV process.
5. The process of Re-Visit is same except for the logistic expenses will be borne by the NAAC.
Note: HEIs are advised to check their portal & registered email-id frequently for updates
throughout the process.
IX. RE-ASSESSMENT
Institutions, which would like to make an improvement in the accredited status, may
volunteer for re-assessment, after completing at least one year, but not after the completion of
three years. The option can be exercised only once in a cycle. Re-assessed institution cannot
come for another re-assessment in the same cycle. The current procedures and methodology
including the manual for the Assessment and Accreditation is applicable for all institutions
applying for re-assessment. The fee structure and other process would be as per the current
procedures of Assessment and Accreditation (more details can be obtained from NAAC
website). Institutions that volunteer for re-assessment will not be eligible for fee waiver and
reimbursement of accreditation expenses.
X. SUBSEQUENT CYCLES OF ACCREDITATION
30
The methodology for subsequent cycles of accreditation remains the same. However, due
consideration would be given to the post-accreditation activities resulting in quality improvement,
quality sustenance and quality enhancement. In the SSRs institutions opting for subsequent cycles
of accreditation need to highlight the significant quality sustenance and enhancement measures
undertaken during the last four years. A functional Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) and
timely submission of Annual Quality Assurance Reports (AQARs) are the Minimum Institutional
Requirements (MIR) to volunteer for second, third or fourth cycle accreditation.
Institutions intending to be assessed to continue their accreditation need to apply afresh by

submission of A&A application during the last six months of their validity period.
The validity period of NAAC accreditation for third / fourth cycle institutions will be
extended from five years to seven years, with a condition that they have obtained highest grade
for immediate preceding two cycles continuously, in addition provided the institution again
obtains highest grade in the third / fourth cycle also.
With reference to the Highest Grade obtained by HEI‟s in various cycle will be as below:
-
„A++‟ with CGPA 3.51 in the Grading system that is effective from 1st March, 2018.
„A++ & A+‟ with CGPA 3.51 in the Grading system that was effective, between 1st July,
2016 to 28th Feb, 2018
„A‟ in the Grading system that was effective, between 1st April, 2007 to 30th June, 2016
„A++, A+, & A‟ with score 85-100 that was effective between 16th March 2002 to 31st
March 2007.
In the case of institutions which apply for reaccreditation within the stipulated period of
six months before the end of the cycle of accreditation, as per the guidelines of National
Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), the gap period between two consecutive
accreditation will be condoned. In case of other institutions which have not applied as per the
guidelines mentioned above, the maximum periodfor condonation would be one year between the
two consecutive accreditation cycles.
XI. THE FEE STRUCTURE AND OTHER FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

NewFEE STRUCTURE
(w.e.f. April 01, 2021)
Note: New fees structure is applicable to HEIs who are submitting IIQA fees on or after
April 01, 2021.
1. Institutional Information for Quality Assessment (IIQA) Fee
For Registration – applicable to all institutions i.e., irrespective of their status of

recognition under 12(B) of UGC Act, 1956 (i.e. recognized/not recognized)
31
Process Total amount of Application fee for Assessment and

Accreditation (A&A) to be paid by the Institution
Institutional Rs. 25,000/- + G S T 18%

Information for Quality
Assessment (IIQA) (Non-refundable) *
* In case of rejection of IIQA application, HEIs may resubmit IIQA application for a
maximum of three attempts without IIQA fees, including the rejection attempt, within the
period of one year from the first application of IIQA.
32
1. Assessment and Accreditation Fees:

1 2 3
Type Total amount of A&A Amount to be paid by the

Fee Institution
For Universities and Professional Rs.1,50,000/-** + GST18% =

Institutions * Rs.1,77,000/-
Rs. 3,00,000/-**+
(50% of Total fee along with the
GST18%
SSR)
(Non-refundable)
ForColleges (Grant-in-Aid, Private Rs.50,000/-**+ GST18% = Rs.

and Government) 59,000/-
Rs. 1,00,000/-**+
Mono Faculty, Multi Faculty, (50% of Total fee along with the
GST18%
Teacher Education Institution and SSR)
Physical Education Institution (Non-refundable)
** Balance 50% of total fees along with 18% GST need to be paid by the HEI within 15 days from
the date of Pre-qualification.
* Professional Institutions: Fees will be charged as per the fee structure as applicable to
Universities, i.e. Engineering and Technology, Management, Law, Health Sciences (Allopathy,
Homoeopathy, Ayurveda, Dental, Pharmacy, Nursing etc.)
Note:
i. Professional Institutions - Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in which all the

programs offered are recognised by the Statutory Regulatory Authority(s) (SRA)
(Excluding Teacher Education Institutions) or HEIs in which 50 % or more of the
programmes offered are recognised by the Statutory Regulatory Authority (s). Similar
to Universities the A&A fee for Professional Institutions will be calculated depending
on the number of the departments.
ii. NAAC has classified the programs offered leading to specific Degrees awarded as Arts
Faculty, Commerce Faculty and Science Faculty. In case of General Colleges, HEIs are
broadly categorised by NAAC for the purposes of deciding on the applicable Fee as
Mono Faculty and Multi Faculty colleges.
Colleges offering programs leading to Degrees such as BA, MA, BSW, MSW, BRS, MRS
are considered as Arts Faculty, those colleges offering programs leading to Degrees
such as B.Com, M.Com, BBA, BMS and other degrees relating to programs (not
recognised by any SRA) in business administration/ commerce/ management are
considered as Commerce Faculty.
33
Science Faculty are those offering programs leading to Degrees such as

B.Sc., M.Sc., B.F.Sc., M.F.Sc., BCA, B. Stat. M. Stat. and other degrees relating to
programs (not recognised by any SRA) in applied and pure sciences.
a. Mono Faculty - The Mono faculty institutions are those Higher education
Institutions (HEIs) offering programs in only one discipline i.e. either in Arts,
Commerce or Science.
b. Multi Faculty - The Multi faculty institutions are those Higher education
Institutions (HEIs) offering programs in more than one discipline i.e. either in a
combination of Arts and Commerce, Science and Commerce, Science and Arts or
Arts, Commerce and Science.
c. Teacher Education Institutions/Physical Education are those Higher

Education Institutions (HEIs) in which all the programs offered are recognized
by Statutory Regulatory Authority(s) (SRA) i.e. NCTE or RCI or HEIs in which
more than 50% of the programmes offered are recognized by SRAs i.e. NCTE
or RCI.
4. Balance amount 50%
i. 50% of the stipulated fee + applicable taxes along with on line submission of Self-study
Report (SSR)(Non-refundable).
ii. The pre-qualified HEIs will be asked to pay balance 50% of the stipulated fees+
applicable taxes as shown in column 2 & 3 above within 15 days from date of
prequalification. If the institution does not pay the fee within 15 days, the SSR will not
be processed. They have to apply again / afresh with IIQA and its fees.
 Mandatory Taxes/GST will not be refunded.
iii. If the Institution does not take up the accreditation process, the fees will not be returned
to the institution. However, the same will be adjusted when next time accreditation
process is taken up. (The Maximum time limit up to which it can be carry forwarded
shall be one year from the date of submission of the SSR).
iv. In case of withdrawal or failure to pre-qualify on submission of SSR first level fees, the
fees paid shall be forfeited.
v. In case of withdrawal after submission of SSR before the visit, the fees paid on SSR
second level and PTV logistic deposit shall only be refunded and fees paid for SSR first
level shall be forfeited. However logistic expenses, if any resulting in cancellation of
airtickets or hotel accommodation etc., shall be as per actual and balance, if any shall be
refunded.
vi. In case of withdrawal after the onsite-visit and before the declaration of result, all fees
paid shall be forfeited. However logistic expenses shall be as per actual and balance, if
34
any shall be refunded or excess recovered.
5. Logistics Deposit: Institution has to pay an advance, within 15 days, towards logistic
expenses for the arrangement of Peer Team Visit, after clearing Pre-qualifier stage,
which is asfollows (w.e.f. December 1st, 2022):-
a. All General colleges, Professional colleges and Teacher education institutions will have
a Two (2) day visit for which the fee structure will be Rs. 2,00,000 + GST 18%.
b. In case of exceptional case of Professional colleges with proper justifications and
approval from the competent authority the Peer Team Visit can be extended to Three (3)
days & the fee structure will be Rs.5,00,000 + GST18%.
c. For University the Fee structure of logistics will be Rs. 5,00,000 + GST 18% for Three
(3) days of visit.
d. If the University has UGC recognized off-shore campus/centers, then the University has
to pay an additional fee of Rs. 2,00,000/- + GST 18% or actuals per offshore campus to be
visited.
e. Arrangement of peer team logistics by NAAC is as per actuals on no loss no profit basis
through an outsourced agency. In case of excess expenditure incurred, the institution will
be asked to pay the difference amount and if the expenses are less, the amount will be
refunded to concerned institution.
6. Appeals Mechanism and Fee:

For Appeals (grievance) mechanism Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) + GST 18%
(non – refundable fee ) to be paid by HEI as applicable from time to time.
7. For subsequent cycles of Accreditation:
The fee structure proposed for Assessment and Accreditation and Peer team logistics
expenses as above will be same for all the cycles of Accreditation and Re-assessment to all
types of Institutions.
35
8. Mode of Payment: Online:

All fees needs to be remitted on NAAC portal through netbanking or credit/debit cards only.
Fees payments can also be made from individual accounts on behalf of HEIs. Payment by
Demand Draft (DD) or NEFT is not permitted.
For Government Colleges, in case of fees transferred from treasury, the college may approach
The Director, NAAC or The Finance Officer, NAAC.
XII. GETTING READY FOR SUBMISSION OF SELF - STUDY REPORT (SSR)
HEIs applying for A&A process should take note of the changes in the assessment
process. It must be noted that the SSR has to be submitted online only through portal. The
portal will be made available to the Institution on the NAAC website in ‘Apply Online Tab’.
It would be helpful if the institution read the Manual and Standard Operating Procedure
(SOP)carefully and get ready with all kinds of details required to be filled up in online format.
Use this Manual for understanding the revised process of A&A and preparing for the submission
of SSR in the new online format.
Some significant tips are reiterated below.
 While submitting the IIQA, ensure that there is adequate number of days for processing
the SSR within the stipulated period, after the date of its acceptance by NAAC.
 The SSR has to be filled online; for this NAAC will provide access to the respective portal
on the website for institutions, according to pre-declared timeline.
 Read instruction about where to upload the documents and data, in what format data have
to be presented for the various metrics and required verbal explication for the qualitative
metrics.
 Kinds of information to be filled in the SSR are given in the QIF, presented in Section B.
 The Profile of the Institution given in Section B is self-evident in seeking information
about the institution.
 The QIF given in Section B indicates the kinds of data and documents required for each of
the Metrics while filling up the SSR and also kinds of responses to be given.
 In an initial exercise, the institution can prepare details as sought in the QIF (Section B)
about the various aspects of its functioning and upload them in a protected space on the
institutional website. This will make it easy to upload and/or make them available through
hyperlinks whenever required.
 Some of the documents indicated such as minutes of various committees/bodies, financial
details and similar items for which the institution may not like to provide in open access
could be kept ready and made available through hyperlinks whenever required.
 Keep all the relevant documents and data indicated in the QIF for each Metric under all
KIs as a template so that when access to online SSR is available, it‟s easy to provide
pertinent data.
 Wherever verbal descriptions are required write briefly as indicated (eg. . . in not more
than 500 words…. or…. in not more than 200 words…, etc). Contemplate well and
prepare the write ups explicating the highlights of the sought details about the institution
without wasting space/words on „frill‟ details.
36
 The online formats (templates) for submitting data with respect to Quantitative Metrics
(QnM) can be downloaded from NAAC website available in an „Apply Online Tab’.
 Ensure authentic, correct data are provided throughout. Incorrect data or false
detailscould lead to disqualification or penalty.
 Strictly adhere to the time specifications given by NAAC.
 Some details may have to be worked out if they are not ready; eg. COs, POs, compiled
reports from various minutes and analyses of feedback, etc...
 Keep a brief executive summary for upload as per details given in Section B.
 Do not send any information as hard copy to NAAC unless specified.
 Read the Manual completely including the Glossary / Notes and SOP available in NAAC
Website. This will help in clear understanding of the terms used in the Quality Indicator
Framework (QIF).
 For Metric related to finance the preceding financial year (1st April to 31st March) may be
used to consolidate data, for publication related data preceding calendar year (1st January
to 31st December) data to be entered and for the other metrics the academic year may be
taken for data to be entered in „data capturing format‟ of portal.
XIII. MANDATORY DISCLOSURE ON HEI’s WEBSITE
To ensure the transparency in the process of Assessment and Accreditation, it is necessary for the
Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) to upload the SSR along with other relevant documents on
Institutional website. Thus it is suggested to create a separate NAAC tab/link on Higher
Educational Institutions (HEIs) website and upload following documents till the validity period of
Accreditation is over:
1) SSR submitted online, to be uploaded after DVV process only (.pdf format).
2) Data templates which are uploaded along with SSR.
3) Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR – Year wise).
4) Accreditation outcome document viz., Certificate, Grade sheet, etc.
The Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) may suitably design their NAAC tab/link to
accommodate all relevant documents.
37
SECTION-B
Data Requirements for Self - Study Report (SSR)
This section gives details of various data required for filling up the online format of
the Self - Study Report, viz.,
1. Executive Summary
2. Profile of the Autonomous College
3. Extended Profile of the Autonomous College
4. Quality Indicator Framework (QIF)
5. Evaluative report of the Departments
38
1.Executive Summary
Every HEI applying for the A&A process shall prepare an Executive Summary highlighting
the main features of the Institution including
 Introductory Note on the Institution: location, vision mission, type of the

institution etc.
 Criterion-wise Summary on the Institution‟s functioning in not more than 250
words for each criterion.
 Brief note on Strength Weaknesses Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC) in
respect of the Institution.
 Any additional information about the Institution other than ones already stated.
 Over all conclusive explication about the institution‟s functioning.
The Executive summary shall not be more than 5000 words.
39
2. Profileof theAutonomous College
Basic Information
Name and Address of the College
Name
Address
City Pin
State Website
Contacts for Communication
Designation Name Telephone with Mobile Fax e-mail

STD with Code
Nature of Institution Institution Status
Type of Institution By Gender
By Shift
Establishment Date of
Details establishment, prior
to the grant of
(Autonomy)
Date of grant of (Autonomous, Constituent, PG Centre, any

„Autonomy‟ to the other)
College by UGC
Establishment date
40
Institution to which the college if affiliated
State Institution Name View Document
Religious
Recognized Minority Institution
If it is a recognized minority institution Yes No

If yes, Specify minority status
Religious
Linguistic
Any Other
Recognition Details
Date of Recognition by UGC or any Other National Agency
Under Section Date
2f of UGC
12B of UGC
New Programme introduced during the last five years:
No of New Programmes introduced Programs not covered under the

during the last five years and name Autonomous status of UGC
No. Name UG PG
Latest
year
1.
2.
3.
41
4.
5.
Programmes offered Aided Self-financed
Professional Programmes
offered
Details of Recognition
Details of Recognition / Approval by Statutory/ Regulatory bodies like AICTE, NCTE, MCI,
DCI, PCI,RCI, etc (other than UGC)
Statutory Recognition / Day, Validity in Remarks
Authority Approval details Month, months
Regulatory Institution Year
/Department (DD/MM/Y
NCTE
Programme YYY)
AICTE
DCI
PCI
ICAR
INC
BCI
CCIM
42
NMC
CCH
VCI
COA
RCI
Institution with Potential for Excellence
Is the college recognition of UGC as a Yes No

College with Potential for Excellence
(CPE)?
If yes, date of recognition?

Is the college recognized for its Yes No
performance by any other government
agency?
If yes name the agency

Date of recognition
Location, Area and Activity of Campus
Campus Address Location Campus Area in Built up Area in sq.mts.

Type Acres
Urban
Semi Urban
Rural
Tribal
Hill
ACADEMIC INFORMATION
Details of the Programmes Offered by the College (Given Data for Current Academic year)
43
Level of Name of Duration Entry Medium of Sanctioned No. Of

Programme/ of Months Qualification Students
Programme Course Instruction Strength Admitted
Details of Teaching & Non-Teaching Staff of Institution
Teaching Faculty
Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor
Ma Fema Oth Tota Ma Fema Oth Tota Ma Fema Other Tota

le le ers l le le ers l le le s l
Sanctioned
by the
UGC/
institution/
State
Governme
nt
Recruited
Yet to
Recruit
On Contract
Sanctioned
by the
Manageme
nt /
Society/or
other
Authorised
Body
Recruited
Yet to
Recruit
44
Non- Teaching Staff
Male Female Others Total
Sanctioned
Recruited
Yet to Recruit
Sanctioned by
the
Management /
Society/or
other
Authorised
Body
Recruited
Yet to Recruit
Technical Staff
Male Female Others Total
Sanctioned by the
UGC/ institution/
State Government
Recruited
Yet to Recruit
Sanctioned by the
Management /
Society/or other
Authorised Body
Recruit
Yet to Recruit
Qualification Details of the Teaching Staff
Permanent Teachers
45
Highest Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Total

Qualification
Mal Fema Other Mal Fema Other Mal Fema Other
e le s e le s e le s
D.sc/D.Litt
Ph.D.
M.Phil.
PG
Temporary Teachers

Qualification
Mal Fema Other Mal Fema Other Mal Fema Other
e le s e le s e le s
D.sc/D.Litt
Ph.D.
M.Phil.
PG
Part Time Teachers

Qualification
Male Female Others Male Female Others Male Female Others
D.sc/D.Litt
Ph.D.
M.Phil.
PG
Details of Visiting/Guest Faculties:
46
Number of Visiting/ Guest Faculty engaged Male Female Others Total
With the college
Provide the following details of students enrolled in the college during the current
academic year
Programme From the State From Other NRI Foreign Total

Where College is States of Students Students
Located India
PG Male
Female
Others
UG Male
Female
Others
Provide the following details of students admitted to the college during the last four
academic year
Programme Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
SC Male
Female
Others
ST Male
Female
Others
OBC Male
Female
47
Others
General Male
Female
Others
Others Male
Female
Others
Total
EVALUATIVE REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENTS
Department Name Upload Report
2(a) :Institutional preparedness for NEP
(Description in maximum 500 words)
1. Multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary:
a) Delineate the vision/plan of institution to transform itself into a holistic

multidisciplinary institution.
b) Delineate the Institutional approach towards the integration of humanities and science
with STEM and provide the detail of programs with combinations.
c) Does the institution offer flexible and innovative curricula that includes credit-based
courses and projects in the areas of community engagement and service,
environmental education, and value-based towards the attainment of a holistic and
multidisciplinary education. Explain
48
d) What is the institutional plan for offering a multidisciplinary flexible curriculum that
enables multiple entry and exits at the end of 1st, 2nd and 3rd years of undergraduate
education while maintaining the rigor of learning? Explain with examples.
e) What are the institutional plans to engage in more multidisciplinary research

endeavours to find solutions to society's most pressing issues and challenges?
f) Describe any good practice/s of the institution to promote

Multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary approach in view of NEP 2020.
2. Academic bank of credits (ABC):
a) Describe the initiatives taken by the institution to fulfil the requirement of Academic
bank of credits as proposed in NEP 2020.
b) Whether the institution has registered under the ABC to permit its learners to avail the
benefit of multiple entries and exit during the chosen programme? Provide details.
c) Describe the efforts of the institution for seamless collaboration, internationalization

of education, joint degrees between Indian and foreign institutions, and to enable
credit transfer.
d) How faculties are encouraged to design their own curricular and pedagogical
approaches within the approved framework, including textbook, reading material
selections, assignments, and assessments etc.
e) Describe any good practice/s of the institution pertaining to the implementation of

Academic bank of credits (ABC) in the institution in view of NEP 2020.
3. Skill development:
a) Describe the efforts made by the institution to strengthen the vocational education and
soft skills of students in alignment with National Skills Qualifications Framework
b) Provide the details of the programmes offered to promote vocational education and its
integration into mainstream education.
c) How the institution is providing Value-based education to inculcate positivity

amongst the learner that include the development of humanistic, ethical,
Constitutional, and universal human values of truth (satya), righteous conduct
(dharma), peace (shanti), love (prem), nonviolence (ahimsa), scientific temper,
citizenship values, and also life-skills etc.
d) Enlist the institution‟s efforts to:
i. Design a credit structure to ensure that all students take at least one vocational
course before graduating.
49
ii. Engaging the services of Industry veterans and Master Crafts persons to
provide vocational skills and overcome gaps vis-à-vis trained faculty
provisions.
iii. To offer vocational education in ODL/blended/on-campus modular modes to

Learners.
iv. NSDC association to facilitate all this by creating a unified platform to

manage learner enrolment (students and workers), skill mapping, and
certification.
v. Skilling courses are planned to be offered to students through online and/or

distance mode.
e) Describe any good practice/s of the institution pertaining to the Skill development in
view of NEP 2020.
4. Appropriate integration of Indian Knowledge system (teaching in Indian Language,

culture, using online course):
a) Delineate the strategy and details regarding the integration of the Indian Knowledge
system (teaching in Indian Language, culture etc,) into the curriculum using both
offline and online courses.
b) What are the institutions plans to train its faculties to provide the classroom delivery
in bilingual mode (English and vernacular)? Provide the details.
c) Provide the details of the degree courses taught in Indian languages and bilingually in
the institution.
d) Describe the efforts of the institution to preserve and promote the following:
i. Indian languages (Sanskrit, Pali, Prakrit and classical, tribal and endangered
etc.)
ii. Indian ancient traditional knowledge
iii. Indian Arts
iv. Indian Culture and traditions.
e) Describe any good practice/s of the institution pertaining to the appropriate

integration of Indian Knowledge system (teaching in Indian Language, culture, using
online course) in view of NEP 2020.
5.Focus on Outcome based education (OBE):
50
a) Describe the institutional initiatives to transform its curriculum towards Outcome

based Education (OBE)?
b) Explain the efforts made by the institution to capture the Outcome based education in
teaching and learning practices.
c) Describe any good practice/s of the institution pertaining to the Outcome based
education (OBE) in view of NEP 2020.
6. Distance education/online education:
a) Delineate the possibilities of offering vocational courses through ODL mode in the
institution.
b) Describe about the development and use of technological tools for teaching learning
activities. Provide the details about the institutional efforts towards the blended
learning.
c) Describe any good practice/s of the institution pertaining to the Distance

education/online education in view of NEP 2020.
2(b) : Institutional Initiatives for Electoral Literacy
(Description in maximum 500 words)
1. Whether Electoral Literacy Club (ELC) has been set up in the College?
2. Whether students‟ co-ordinator and co-ordinating faculty members are appointed by
the College and whetherthe ELCs are functional? Whether the ELCs are
representative in character?
3. What innovative programmes and initiatives undertaken by the ELCs? These may
include voluntary contribution by the students in electoral processes-participation in
voter registration of students and communities where they come from, assisting
district election administration in conduct of poll, voter awareness campaigns,
promotion of ethical voting, enhancing participation of the under privileged sections
of society especially transgender, commercial sex workers, disabled persons, senior
citizens, etc.
4. Any socially relevant projects/initiatives taken by College in electoral related issues
especially research projects, surveys, awareness drives, creating content, publications
highlighting their contribution to advancing democratic values and participation in
electoral processes, etc.
51
5. Extent of students above 18 years who are yet to be enrolled as voters in the electoral
roll and efforts by ELCs as well as efforts by the College to institutionalize
mechanisms to register eligible students as voters.
3. Extended Profile of the Autonomous College
Extended Used in
Pf. No. calculation
of metric
1.1 Number of students on rolls year wise during last five years 2.2.2
4.3.2
Year 5.1.1
Number
(all students in campus needs to be considered here)
Upload the specific document as per description given below
Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template)
Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of

public disclosure
Apart from the above:
Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if
any)
1.2 Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years 2.6.2
5.2.1
5.2.2
Year
Number
• Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template)
 Provide the relevant information in institutional website as

part of public disclosure
52
any)
2.1 Number of full time teachers year wise during the last five years 2.2.2
2.4.1
Year 2.4.3
3.2.2
Number 3.4.5
3.4.6
6.3.2
6.3.3
 Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template)

 Certified list of full time teachers along with the departmental
affiliation in the latest completed academic year.
any)
Note:
 Appointment letter of selected teachers will be sought during the
DVV clarification.
 A teacher employed for at least 90 per cent of the normal or
statutory number of hours of work for a fulltime teacher (including
contractual) over a complete academic year is classified as a full-
time teacher .
2.2 Total number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution 2.4.2
(without repeat count) during last five years: __________ 3.1.3
3.2.2
3.4.4
• Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template) 3.4.5
3.4.6
any)
3.1 Total expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years
(INR in lakhs) 4.1.2
4.2.2
Year 4.4.1
INR in
Lakhs
53
The institutions are encouraged to provide the relevant information in

institutional website as part of public disclosure

any)
4. Quality Indicator Framework (QIF)
Essential Note:
The SSR has to be filled in an online format available on the NAAC website.
The QIF given below presents the Metrics under each Key Indicator (KI) for all the seven
Criteria.
While going through the QIF, details are given below each Metric in the form of:
 data required
 formula for calculating the information, wherever required, and
 File description – for uploading of document where so-ever required.
These will help Institutions in the preparation of their SSR.
For some Qualitative Metrics (QlM) which seek descriptive data it is specified as to what
kind of information has to be given and how much. It is advisable to keep data accordingly
compiled beforehand.
For the Quantitative Metrics (QnM) wherever formula is given, it must be noted that these are
given merely to inform the HEIs about the manner in which data submitted will be used. That
is the actual online format seeks only data in specified manner which will be processed
digitally.
Metric wise weightage is also given.
The actual online format may change slightly from the QIF given in this Manual, in order to
bring compatibility with IT design. Observe this carefully while filling up.
54
Criterion I – Curricular Aspects (150)

Key Indicator – 1.1 Curriculum Design and Development (50)
Metric Metric Weightage
No.
1.1.1 Curricula developed and implemented have relevance to the local, 20
QlM regional, national, and global developmental needs, which is
reflected in the Programme outcomes (POs) and Course
Outcomes(COs) of the Programmes offered by the institution
Write description in maximum of 500 words
File Description
 Upload Additional information
 Provide Link for Additional information
1.1.2 The programmes offered by the institution focus on employability/ 30

Ql M entrepreneurship/ skill development and their course syllabi are
adequately revised to incorporate contemporary requirements
File Description
Key Indicator – 1.2 Academic Flexibility (30)
1.2.1 Percentage of new courses introduced out of the total number of 30
QnM courses across all programmes offered during the last five years
1.2.1.1: Number of new courses introduced during the last five years:
1.2.1.2 : Consolidated number of courses offered by the institution

across all Programmes (without repeat count) during the last five
years :
Number of new courses
introduced during the last five years
Formula: Number of courses offered 100
during the last five years

 Minutes of Board of Studies meeting clearly specifying the
syllabus approval of new courses
 Subsequent Academic Council meeting extracts endorsing the
decision of BOS
any)
55
Key Indicator – 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (50)

1.3.1 Institution integrates cross-cutting issues relevant to Professional 15
Ql M Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability
and other value framework enshrined in Sustainable Development
Goals and National Education Policy – 2020 into the Curriculum
File Description

1.3.2 Number of certificate/value added courses/Diploma Programmes 25

QnM offered by the institutions and online courses of MOOCs,
SWAYAM/e-PG Pathshala/ NPTEL and other recognized platforms
where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully
completed during the last five years
1.3.2.1 Number of certificate/value added courses/Diploma

Programmes offered by the institutions and online courses of MOOCs,
SWAYAM/e-PG Pathshala/ NPTEL and other recognized platforms
(without repeat count) where the students of the institution have
enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years.

 Institutional programme brochure/notice for Certificate/Value
added programs with course modules and outcomes
 List of students and the attendance sheet for the above mentioned
programs
 Evidence of course completion, like course completion certificate
etc.

any)
Note: No repeat count of courses will be considered
1.3.3 Percentage of programmes that have components of field projects / 10

QnM research projects / internships during the last five years.
1.3.3.1: Total Number of programmes that have components of field

56
projects / research projects / internships (without repeat count) during

the last five years
1.3.3.2: Total Number of programmes offered (without repeat count)

Formula:

 Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part
of public disclosure
 Program and course contents having element of field projects /
research projects / internships as approved by BOS
 Sample Internship completion letter provided by host
institutions
 Sample Evaluated project report/field work report submitted
by the students
any)
Note: The term internship is inclusive of Industry Immersion

practices
Key Indicator – 1.4 Feedback System (20)

1.4.1 Structured feedback for curriculum and its transaction is regularly 20
Qnm obtained from stakeholders like Students, Teachers, Employers,
Alumni, Academic peers etc., and Feedback processes of the
institution may be classified as follows:
A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken & communicated

to the relevant bodies and feedback hosted on the institutional
website
B. Feedback collected, analysed, action has been taken and
communicated to the relevant bodies
C. Feedback collected and analysed
D. Feedback collected
E. Feedback not collected
 At least 4 filled-in feedback form from different stake holders like

57
Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc.

 Feedback analysis report submitted to appropriate bodies
 Action taken report on the feedback analysis
 Link of institution‟s website where comprehensive feedback, its
analytics and action taken report are hosted
any)
Note: The institution is expected to take feedback from at least two
stake holders
Criterion II – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation (300)

Key Indicator - 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (20)
2.1.1 Enrolment percentage 10
QnM
2.1.1.1: Number of seats filled year wise during last five years
(Only first year admissions to be considered)
Year
Number
2.1.1.2: Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years
Year
Number
Formula:

 Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public
disclosure
 Document relating to sanction of intake as approved by competent
authority
 Final admission list as published by the HEI and endorsed by the
competent authority.
any)
58
2.1.2 Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC 10
QnM etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission
2.1.2.1: Number of actual students admitted from the reserved

categories in the first year of the programme year wise during the last
five years
Year
Numbe
r
2.1.2.2: Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per
GoI/State Govt. rule year wise during the last five years
Year
Number
Formula:

 Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public
disclosure
 Copy of the letter issued by the State govt. or Central Government
Indicating the reserved categories(SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.)
to be considered as per the state rule (Translated copy in English to
be provided as applicable)
 Final admission list indicating the category as published by the HEI
and endorsed by the competent authority.
any
Note:
1.Include only those reserved categories as specified by the
State/Central Government orders for admission.
2.Only those seats filled against the quota should be counted here.
3.In case of Minority institutions number of reserved seats for
Minority candidates and number of Minority Students enrolled in
the first year shall be considered.
Key Indicator - 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity (30)
59
2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and 15
Ql M organises special Programmes to cater to differential learning
needs of the student
File Description
 Provide link for additional information
 Upload Any additional information
2.2.2 Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed 15
QnM academic year)
Formula: Students (Latest completed academic year) : Teachers

(Latest completed academic year)
 No Template as the information is already provided in

Extended profile 1.1 and 2.1
 Certified list of full time teachers along with the departmental
affiliation in the latest completed academic year.
 List showing the number of students in each of the programs
for the latest completed academic year across all semesters
any)
 Note: A teacher employed for at least 90 per cent of the

normal or statutory number of hours of work for a fulltime
teacher (including contractual) over a complete academic
year is classified as a full-time teacher .
Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching - Learning Process (50)

2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, 30
Q lM participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used
for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT- enabled
tools including online resources for effective teaching and
learning process
File Description
 Upload any additional information

 Provide Link for Additional Information
2.3.2 The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address 10

Q lM
60
academics and student-psychological issues
File Description

 List of Active mentors
2.3.3 Preparation and adherence of Academic Calendar and Teaching 10

Q lM plans by the institution
Describe the Preparation and adherence to Academic Calendar and

Teaching plans by the institution.
Write description in maximum of 500 words.
File Description

Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (50)

2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the 15
Q nM number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years
2.4.1.1: Number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five
years
Year
Number
Formula:
umber of full time teachers
Percentage per year = umber of sanctioned posts
100
Average Percentage = √
 Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template merged

with 2.4.3 and 2.4.4)
 Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of
61
public disclosure
 Sanction letters indicating number of posts sanctioned by the
competent authority (including Management sanctioned posts).
any)
Note: Appointment letter of selected teachers will be sought during the

DVV clarification
2.4.2 Percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D 25

Q nM during the last five years
2.4.2.1: Number of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./

L.L.D during the last five years
Formula:
Total number of full time teachers with
Ph D D Sc D Litt L L D during the last five years
Percentage =
Total Number of full time teachers during the last five years
100
• Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template merged

with 3.2.3 and 3.4.2)
 Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part
of public disclosure
 List of faculty having Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D along with
particulars of the degree awarding university, subject and the year
of award per academic year.
 Copies of Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D awarded by UGC
recognized universities

any)
Note:
1. Provisional Degree Certificate may be considered wherever

Degree Certificate is not awarded
2. Honoris Causa degrees are not to be considered
2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data to be 5

QnM provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of
years)
2.4.3.1: Total teaching experience of full-time teachers as of latest
62
completed academic year
Formula:
otal teaching experience of full time teachers

Number of full time teachers during the latest completed
academic year

with 2.4.1 and 2.4.4)
any)
Note: Experience certificate/ appointment order of selected faculty

will be sought during DVV clarification.
2.4.4 Percentage of full time teachers working in the institution 5

Q nM throughout during the last five years
2.4.4.1: Number of full time teachers worked in the institution

throughout during the last five years:
Formula:
• Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template merged

with 2.4.1 and 2.4.3)
any)
Note:
1. Full Time Teachers who have been working in the
organization continuously during the entire assessment period
only to be considered here.
2. Appointment order of selected faculty will be sought during
DVV clarification.
Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms (50)
63
2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- 20
Q nM end examination till the last date of declaration of results during the
last five years
2.5.1.1: Number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end
examination till the last date of declaration of results year wise during
the last five years
Assessment Year
Number of days
Formula:

 Exam timetable released by the Controller of Examination
 Result Sheet with date of publication
 Policy document on Declaration of results (if any)
any)
Note: In terms of semester system, consider details of even

semester only
2.5.2 Percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation 15

Q nM against total number appeared in the examinations during the last
five years
2.5.2.1: Number of complaints/grievances about evaluation year wise

during last five years
Year
Number
2.5.2.2: Number of students appeared in the examination conducted

by the institution year wise during the last five years
Year
Number
Formula:
64
Total number of complaints or grievanves

Percentage about evaluation
 No data template
 List of students who have applied for re- valuation/re-totaling
program wise certified by the Controller of Examinations year-wise
for the assessment period.
any)
Note: One student to be counted only once in a year irrespective of the

number of papers/courses for which he/she has applied.
2.5.3 IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and 15

Q lM processes including Continuous Internal Assessment
(CIA)/Formative Assessment have brought in considerable
improvement in Examination Management System (EMS) of the
Institution
Describe the examination reforms with reference to the following

within a minimum of 500 words
 Examination procedures
 Processes integrating IT
 Continuous internal assessment system
File Description

 Provide links as Additional Information
Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (50)

2.6.1 The institution has stated learning outcomes (programme and 30
Q lM course outcome)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the
assessment process and widely publicized through the website and
other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by
the institution
Write a description in maximum of 500 words
File Description
65

 Upload POs and COs for all courses (exemplars from Glossary)
2.6.2 Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data for 20

Q nM the latest completed academic year)
2.6.2.1: Total number of final year students who passed the

examination conducted by Institution during the latest completed
academic year:
Formula:
Total Number of final year students who passed the examination
during the lastest completed academic year
100
( )
( )

 Annual report of Controller of Examinations ( COE) highlighting the
pass percentage of final year students
 Certified report from the COE indicating the pass percentage of
students of the final year (final semester) eligible for the degree
program-wise / year wise
any)
Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (50)

2.7.1 Online student satisfaction survey regarding the teaching learning 50
Q nM process.
(Online survey will be conducted)
Data Requirements: (As per Data Template)
(Database of all students on roll need to be prepared as per data

template and shared with NAAC along with the online submission of
QIF)
Please refer SSS guidelines available on NAAC website
Criterion III – Research, Innovations and Extension (150)

Key Indicator - 3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities (20)
3.1.1 The institution’s research facilities are frequently updated and there 6
Q lM are well defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded
66
on the institutional website and implemented
File Description

3.1.2 The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research 8
QnM
3.1.2.1: Amount of seed money provided by institution to its teachers
for research year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs)
Year
INR in lakhs

 List of faculty who have been provided with seed money for
research along with the title of the project, duration and amount
year-wise.
 Sanction letters of seed money to the teachers is mandatory.
 Audited Income-Expenditure statement highlighting the
expenditure towards seed money endorsed by the Finance Officer
any)
Note: Seed money grant less than one lakh per faculty shall not be
considered.
67
3.1.3 Percentage of teachers receiving national/ international 6

Q nM fellowship/financial support by various agencies for advanced
studies/ research during the last five years
3.1.3.1: Number of teachers who received national/international

fellowship /financial support by various agencies, for advanced
studies / research; year-wise during the last five years
Formula:
Total number of teachers who received national
international fellowship financial support by various
agencies for advanced studies research during the last five years
100
Total number of full time teachers ( ) during the last five years

• E-copies of the award letters of the teachers.
• List of teachers who have received the awards along with nature of
award, the awarding agency etc.
any)
Note: Sponsored International travel grant for advanced studies/

research can also be included here
Key Indicator - 3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research (10)

3.2.1 Research funding received by the institution and its faculties 5
Q nM through Government and non-government sources such as industry,
corporate houses, international bodies for research project,
endowment research chairs during the last five years
3.2.1.1: Total Grants research funding received by the institution and

its faculties through Government and non-government sources such as
industry, corporate houses, international bodies for research project,
endowment research chairs during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
• Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template is merged

with 3.2.2)
• List of Extramural funding received for research, Endowment
Research Chairs received during the last five years along with the
nature of award, the awarding agency and the amount.
• Copies of the letters of award for research, endowments, Chairs
68
sponsored by non- government sources

any)
3.2.2 Number of research projects per teacher funded by government, 2

Q nM non-government , industry, corporate houses, international bodies
3.2.2.1: Number of research projects funded by government and non-

government agencies during the last five years
Formula:
( ) ( ) )

Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template merged with
3.2.1)
List of project titles with details of Principal Investigator, amount
sanctioned and sanctioning agency etc.
Copies of the grant award letters for research projects sponsored by
government agencies.
any)
3.2.3 Percentage of teachers recognised as research guides as in the latest 3
Q nM completed academic year
3.2.3.1: Number of teachers recognised as research guides as in the

latest completed academic year:
Formula:
( )
Documents:
2.4.2 and 3.4.2)
Upload copies of the letter of the university recognizing faculty as
research guides
Key Indicator - 3.3 Innovation Ecosystem (10)
69
3.3.1 Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian

Q lM Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, 10
establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for
the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes
of the same are evident
File Description

 Any other additional information
Key Indicators - 3.4 Research Publications and Awards (30)
3.4.1 The Institution ensures im pl em ent ati on of i ts stated Code of 5
Q nM Ethics for research
3.4.1.1The institution has a stated Code of Ethics for research and the
implementation of which is ensured through the following:
1. Inclusion of research ethics in the research methodology course

work
2. Presence of institutional Ethics committee (Animal, Chemical,
Bio-ethics etc.)
3. Plagiarism check through software
4. Research Advisory Committee
Options:
A. All of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

 Copy of the syllabus of the research methodology course work to
indicate if research ethics is included.
 Constitution of the ethics committee and its proceedings as
approved by the appropriate body.
 Constitution of research advisory committee and its proceedings as
approved by the appropriate body.
 Bills of purchase of licensed plagiarism check software in the name
of the HEI.
any)
70
3.4.2 Number of candidates registered for Ph.D per teacher during the
Q nM last five years
3.4.2.1: Number of candidates registered for Ph.D during the

last 5 years: 5
Formula:
( )

2.4.2 and 3.2.3)
Ph.D. registration letters/Joining reports of candidates.
Letter from the university indicating name of the Ph.D. student with
title of the doctoral study and the name of the guide.
any)
3.4.3 Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as 5

Q nM notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years
3.4.3.1: Number of research papers in the Journals notified on UGC

CARE list during the last five years
Formula:
umber of research papers in the journals notified on UGC CARE list
( ) Number of full time teachers (without repeat count)during the last five years

 Links to the paper published in journals listed in UGC CARE list or
 Link to the uploaded papers, the first page/full paper (with author
and affiliation details) on the institutional website
 Link re-directing to journal source-cite website in case of digital
journals
any)
Note: The HEI should indicate in the data template against each paper
about the presence of the journal in which the paper is published in the
71
UGC CARE as on date with CARE journal ID
3.4.4 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes published per

QnM
teacher during the last five years
3.4.4.1: Total Number of books and chapters in edited volumes

published during the last five years
Formula:
Total number of books and chapters in edited volumes published
( )Number of full time teachers (without repeat count)
 Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template) 5

 Copy of the Cover page, content page and first page of the
publication indicating ISBN number and year of publication for
books/chapters
 List of chapter/book along with the links redirecting to the source
website.
Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)
3.4.5 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on
QnM
average Citation index in Scopus/ Web of Science
5
3.4.5.1: Total number of Citations in Scopus in 5 years
Total number of Citations in Web of Science in 5 years
3.4.5.2 : Total number of Publications in Scopus in 5 years
Total number of Publications in Web of Science in 5 years
Formula:
Total number of Citation in SCOPUS in five years
Total number of Citation in Web of Science in five years
Total number of Publication in SCOPUS in five years
Total number of Publication in Web of Science in five years
File Description (Upload)
 Any additional information

 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years
Bibliometric of the publications: citation report for the five

preceding calendar years of the assessment period to be uploaded
Note: The Data obtained from INFLIBNET will be used for the
72
purpose of calculation of scores.
3.4.6 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on
QnM
Scopus/ Web of Science – h-index of the Institution
h-index of the institution based on publications made in Scopus Web

of Science during the last five years
Data for the last five years will be considered
 Title of the paper

5
 Name of the author
 Title of the journal
 Year of publication
 H index
Formula:
( ) ( )
File Description (Upload)
 Bibiliometrics of publications based on Scopus/ Web of Science -

h-index of the Institution
 Any additional information
Note: The Data obtained from INFLIBNET will be used for the
purpose of calculation of scores.
Key Indicators - 3.5 Consultancy (10)
3.5.1 Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training during 10
Qn M
the last five years
3.5.1.1: Total Amount generated from consultancy and corporate

training year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs)
Year
INR in lakhs

 Audited statements of accounts indicating the revenue generated
through corporate training/consultancy.
73
 Letter from the corporate to whom training was imparted along with the fee
paid.
 CA certified copy of statement of accounts as attested by head of
the institution.
 Letter from the beneficiary of the consultancy along with details of
the consultancy fee.
any)
Note: Corporate training is inclusive of all monetized training
activities.
Key Indicators - 3.6 Extension Activities (50)

3.6.1 Outcomes of extension activities in the neighbourhood community in 30
QlM
terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues and holistic
development, and awards received if any during the last five years
(Showcase at least four case studies to the peer team)
Describe the impact of extension activities in sensitising students to

social issues and holistic development with four case studies within a
maximum of 500 words
File description
 Provide the link for additional information

3.6.2 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the 20

Qn M
institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with
involvement of community year wise during the last five years
3.6.2.1: Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the

institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with
involvement of community year wise during the last five years.
Year
Numb
er

 Detailed report for each extension and outreach program to be made
available, with specific mention of number of students participated
and the details of the collaborating agency
 Photographs and any other supporting document of relevance should
74
have proper captions and dates.

any)
Note: Celebration of commemorative days to be avoided here
Key Indicator - 3.7 Collaboration (20)

3.7.1 Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in
Qn M
20
India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work,
student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the
last five years
3.7.1.1: Number of functional MoUs / linkages with institutions/

industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training,
project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research
during the last five years:

 List and Copies of documents indicating the functional
MoUs/linkage/collaborations activity-wise and year-wise
 Summary of the functional MoUs/linkage/collaboration indicating
start date, end date, nature of collaboration etc.
 List of year wise activities and exchange should be provided
any)
Note: MoUs /Linkage without any evidence of activity will not be considered
Criterion IV – Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100)
Key Indicator - 4.1 Physical Facilities (30)
4.1.1 The Institution has adequate infrastructure and other facilities 20
Ql M
for
a. teaching – learning, viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing
equipment etc
b. ICT – enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS etc.
c. Facilities for Cultural and sports activities, yoga centre,
games (indoor and outdoor), Gymnasium, auditorium etc.
Describe the adequacy of facilities in maximum of 500 words.
File Description

75
4.1.2 Percentage of expenditure excluding salary, for infrastructure 10

QnM
development and augmentation year wise during the last five years
4.1.2.1: Expenditure for infrastructure development and

augmentation, excluding salary year wise during last five years (INR
in lakhs)
Year
INR in Lakhs
Formula:
Total expenditure for infrastructure development and
augmentation excluding salary during the last five years
Percentage 100
( )Total expenditure excluding salary during the last five years
 Institutional data in the prescribed format (data template is merged

with 4.2.2 and 4.4.1)
 Audited income and expenditure statement of the institution to be
signed by CA and counter signed by the competent authority
(relevant expenditure claimed for infrastructure augmentation
should be clearly highlighted)
Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim
(if any)
Key Indicator - 4.2 Library as a Learning Resource (20)
4.2.1 Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library 15
Ql M
Management System (ILMS), adequate subscriptions to e-resources
and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty
and students
Write description in a maximum of 500 words.
File Description

 Provide the Paste link for additional information
4.2.2 Percentage of expenditure for purchase of books/ e-books and 5

QnM
subscription to journals/e-journals year wise during the last five
years
4.2.2.1: Expenditure for purchase of books / e-books and subscription

to journals/e-journals year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs)
76
Year
INR in lakhs
Total expenditure for purchase of books e books and

subscription to journals e journals
Formula: ( )Total expenditure excluding salary

with 4.1.2 and 4.4.1)
 Audited income and expenditure statement of the institution to be
signed by CA and counter signed by the competent authority
(relevant expenditure claimed for purchase of books/ e-books and
subscription to journals/e-journals should be clearly highlighted)
any)
Key Indicator – 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30)
4.3.1 Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides 12
Ql M
sufficient bandwidth for internet connection
Describe IT facilities including Wi-Fi with date and nature of

updation, available internet bandwidth within a maximum of 500
words
File Description
4.3.2 Student - Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic 10
QnM
year)
4.3.2.1: Number of computers available for students’ usage during

the latest completed academic year:
Formula:
Number of students : Number of Computers
(No template)
 Extracts stock register/ highlighting the computers issued to
respective departments for student‟s usage.
 Purchased Bills/Copies highlighting the number of computers
purchased
77

any)
4.3.3 Institution has dedicated audio visual centre, mixing equipment,
QlM
editing facility, media studio, lecture capturing system(LCS) and
related hardware and software for e-content development 8
Write description in maximum of 500 words.
File Description
Key Indicator - 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20)

4.4.1 Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical 10
QnM
facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary
component, during the last five years
4.4.1.1: Expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities

and academic support facilities excluding salary component year wise
during last five years (INR in lakhs)
Year
INR in lakhs
Formula:
( )

with 4.1.2 and 4.2.2)
 Audited income and expenditure statement of the institution to
be signed by CA and counter signed by the competent authority
(relevant expenditure claimed for maintenance of physical facilities
and academic support facilities should be clearly highlighted)
any)
4.4.2 There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and 10
Ql M
utilizing physical and academic support facilities – laboratory,
library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc.
Describe policy details of systems and procedures for maintaining and

utilizing physical, academic and support facilities within a maximum
78
of 500 words
File Description

Criterion V - Student Support and Progression (100)
Key Indicator - 5.1 Student Support (30)
5.1.1 Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships 11
QnM provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies,
industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years
5.1.1.1: Number of students benefited by scholarships and freeships

provided by the institution, Government and non-government bodies,
industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years
Year
Number
Formula:
Percentage = ( )

 Upload Sanction letter of scholarship and free ships (along with
English translated version if it is in regional language).
 Upload policy document of the HEI for award of scholarship and
freeships.
 Year-wise list of beneficiary students in each scheme duly signed
by the competent authority.
any)
5.1.2 Efforts taken by the institution to provide career counselling 6
including e-counselling and guidance for competitive examinations
Q lM during the last five years
File description
5.1.3 Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities 8

QnM
79
are organised for improving students’ capability
1. Soft skills
2. Language and communication skills
3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, self-
employment and entrepreneurial skills)
4. Awareness of trends in technology
Options:
A. All of the above

D. Any 1of the above

 Report with photographs on programmes/activities conducted to
enhance soft skills, Language & communication skills, and Life
skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, self-employment
and entrepreneurial skills)
 Report with photographs on programmes conducted for awareness
of trends in technology
any)
80
5.1.4 The institution adopts the following for redressal of student 5

QnM
grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies

2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies
with zero tolerance
3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students‟
grievances
4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate
committees
Options:
A. All of the above

D. Any 1 of the above
 Details of statutory/regulatory Committees (to be notified in

institutional website also)
 Proof for Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory
bodies
 Proof w.r.t Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on
policies with zero tolerance
 Proof related to Mechanisms for submission of online/offline
students‟ grievances
 Annual report of the committee monitoring the activities and
number of grievances
any)
Key Indicator - 5.2 Student Progression (30)
5.2.1 Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students 20
Qn M
progressing to higher education during the last five years
5.2.1.1 Number of outgoing students placed and progressed to higher

education during the last five years
Year
Number
Formula:
81
Total number of outgoing students placed and progressed to

higher education during the last five years
Percentage = ( ) Total number of outgoing students 100
year wise during the last five years


any)
5.2.2 Percentage of students qualifying in state/ national/ international 10
Qn M
level examinations out of the graduated students during the last five
years
(eg: NET/SLET/ Civil Services/State government examinations etc.)
5.2.2.1: Number of students qualifying in state/ national/ international

level examinations (eg: NET/SLET/Civil Services/State government
examinations etc.) year wise during last five years
Year
Number
Formula:
Percentage
Total number of students
qualifying in state national international level exams
( ) Total number of students during the last five years

 List of students qualified year wise with details of examination and
links to Qualifying Certificates of the students taking the
examination
any)
Key Indicator - 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (30)

5.3.1 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in 15
QnM
sports/cultural activities at University / state /national / international
Level events during the last five years
5.3.1.1: Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in

sports/cultural activities at University / state / national / international
82
level events (award for a team event should be counted as one) year
wise during last five years
Year
Number

 list and links to e-copies of award letters and certificates
any)
5.3.2 Presence of an active Student Council & representation of students 10

Q1M
on academic & administrative bodies/committees of the institution
Describe the Student Council activity and students‟ role in academic

& administrative bodies within a maximum of 500 words
File description

5.3.3 The institution conducts / organizes following activities: 5

QnM 1. Sports competitions/events
2. Cultural competitions/events
3. Technical fest/Academic fest
4. Any other events through Active clubs and forums
Options:
 A. All four of the above
 B. Any three of the above
 C. Any two of the above
 D. Any one of the above
 E. None of the above

 Report on Sports, Cultural competitions/events, Technical/academic
fests, Any other events through active clubs and forums along with
photographs appropriately dated and captioned (whichever is
applicable)
 Copy of circular/brochure indicating such kind of activities.
 List of students participated in different events year wise signed by
83
the head of the Institution.

any)
Key Indicator - 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10)
5.4.1 Alumni contribution during the last five years to the institution 5
QnM through registered Alumni association
5.4.1.1. Total Amount of alumni contribution during the last five

years (INR in lakhs) to the institution year wise through registered
Alumni association:
Year
Amount
(No template)
 Annual audited statements of accounts of the HEI highlighting the
Alumni contribution duly certified by the Chartered
Accountant/Finance Officer.
 List of alumnus/alumni with the amount contributed year-wise
any)
5.4.2 Alumni contributes and engages significantly to the development of 5
QlM
institution through academic and other support system
Describe the alumni contributions and engagements within a

maximum of 500 words
File Description

Criterion VI – Governance, Leadership and Management (100)

Key Indicator - 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (15)
6.1.1 The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with
Ql M 15
the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various
institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained
institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the
institutional governance and in their short term and long term
Institutional Perspective Plan.
84
File Description

Key Indicator - 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (10)

6.2.1 The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and 6
Ql M
functioning of the institutional bodies are effective and efficient as
visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service
rules, and procedures, etc.
Write description in maximum 500 words
File Description
 Institutional perspective Plan and deployment documents on the
website
6.2.2 Institution implements e-governance in its operations 4

QnM
6.2.2.1 e-governance is implemented covering the following areas of
operations:
1. Administration including complaint management
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examinations
Options:
A. All of the above

B. Any3 of the above
C. Any2 of the above
D. Any1 of the above
 Screen shots of user interfaces of each module reflecting the name of

the HEI.
 Institutional expenditure statements for the budget heads of e-
governance implementation ERP Document
 Annual e-governance report approved by the Governing Council/
Board of Management/ Syndicate Policy document on e-governance
85
any)
Key Indicator - 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (30)
6.3.1 The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare 5
Ql M measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for
career development/progression
Write description in a maximum of 500 words
File Description

6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend 15

QnM
conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional
bodies during the last five years
6.3.2.1: Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend
conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional
bodies year-wise during the last five years
Year
Number
Formula:
Total number of teachers provided with financial
support to attend conferences workshops and
towards membership fee of professional bodies
Percentage = ( )Total number of full time teacher during the last five years
100

 Policy document on providing financial support to teachers
 Copy of letter/s indicating financial assistance to teachers and list of
teachers receiving financial support year-wise under each head.
 Audited statement of account highlighting the financial support to
teachers to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership
fee for professional bodies.
any)
Note: Financial support of Minimum of Rs. 2000/- per year per
faculty will be considered
6.3.3 Percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty 10

QnM
Development Programmes (FDPs)/ Management Development
86
Programmes (MDPs) during the last five years
6.3.3.1: Total number of teachers who have undergone online/ face-

to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)/ Management
Development Programs (MDP) during the last five years
Year
Num
ber
(Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction
Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course )
Formula:
Total number of teaching staff
attending such Programmes during the last five years
Percentage = Total number of 100
full time teachers during the last five years

 Refresher course/Faculty Orientation or other programmes as per
UGC/AICTE stipulated periods, as participated by teachers year-
wise.
 Copy of the certificates of the program attended by teachers.
 Annual reports highlighting the programmes undertaken by the
teachers
any)
Note: FDP less than 5 days will not be considered
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (15)
6.4.1 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds other than salary 5

QlM
and fees and the optimal utilisation of resources
Describe the resource mobilisation policy and procedures of the

Institution within a maximum of 500 words
File Description

6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from government bodies, non-government 5

QnM
bodies, and philanthropists during the last five years (not covered in
87
Criterion III and V)
6.4.2.1: Total Grants received from government/non-government

bodies, philanthropists year wise during last five years (not covered in
Criterion III and V) (INR in Lakhs)
Year
INR in Lakhs

 Annual audited statements of accounts highlighting the grants
received.
 Copy of the sanction letters received from government/ non
government bodies and philanthropists
any)
6.4.3 Institution regularly conducts internal and external financial audits 5

Ql M
regularly
Enumerate the various internal and external financial audits carried

out during the last five years with the mechanism for settling audit
objections within a maximum of 500 words
File Description

Key Indicator - 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (35)

6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)/ Internal Quality Assurance 10
Ql M
System (IQAS) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the
quality assurance strategies and processes, by constantly reviewing
the teaching-learning process, structures & methodologies of
operations and learning outcomes, at periodic intervals
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed

significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies
and processes visible in terms of –
Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with

regard to quality (in case of first cycle)
88
Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with

regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives (second
and subsequent cycles)
Describe two practices institutionalized as a result of IQAC initiatives

within a maximum of 500 words
File Description

6.5.2 The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & 10
Ql M
methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic
intervals through IQAC set up as per norms
Describe any two examples of institutional reviews and

implementation of teaching learning reforms facilitated by the IQAC
within a maximum of 500 words each.
File Description

6.5.3 Institution has adopted the following for Quality assurance: 10

QnM
1. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow up action
taken
2.Conferences, Seminars, Workshops on quality conducted
3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)
4.Orientation programme on quality issues for teachers and students
5. Participation in NIRF and other recognized ranking like Shanghai
Ranking, QS Ranking Times Ranking etc
6.Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international
agencies
Options:
A. Any 5 or more of the above

B. Any4 of the above
C. Any3 of the above (Opt any one)
D. Any2 of the above
E. Any1of the above
89
 Link to Minute of IQAC meetings, hosted on HEI website

 NIRF report, AAA report and details on follow up actions
 Quality audit reports/certificate as applicable and valid for the
assessment period.
 List of Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)
along with brochures and geo-tagged photos with caption and date.
any)
Criterion VII–Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)

Key Indicator - 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)
Gender Equity
7.1.1 Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the 5
QlM
promotion of gender equity during the last five years.
Describe the gender equity & sensitization in curricular and co-

curricular activities, facilities for women on campus etc., within 500
words
File Description

Environmental Consciousness and Sustainability

7.1.2 The Institution has facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy 6
QnM conservation measures
1. Solar energy
2. Biogas plant
3. Wheeling to the Grid
4. Sensor-based energy conservation
5. Use of LED bulbs/ power efficient equipment
6. Wind mill or any other clean green energy
Options:

 Geo-tagged photographs of the facilities.
 Bills for the purchase of equipment‟s for the facilities created under
this metric.
 Permission document for connecting to the grid from the
Government/ Electricity authority
90

any)
7.1.3 Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management of the 6
QlM
following types of degradable and non-degradable waste (within 500
words)
 Solid waste management

 Liquid waste management
 Biomedical waste management
 e-Waste management
 Waste recycling system
 Hazardous chemicals and radioactive waste management
Provide web link to

 Relevant documents like agreements/MoUs with Government and
other approved agencies
 Geo-tagged photographs of the facilities
 Any other relevant information
7.1.4 Water conservation facilities available in the Institution: 5
QnM
1. Rain water harvesting
2. Borewell /Open well recharge
3. Construction of tanks and bunds
4. Waste water recycling
5. Maintenance of water bodies and distribution system in the
campus
Options:


 Geo-tagged photographs of the facilities.
 Bills for the purchase of equipment‟s for the facilities created under
this metric.
 Green audit reports on water conservation by recognised bodies
any)
7.1.5 Green campus initiatives include 4
QlM
Describer the Green campus initiative of the institution including
91
Restricted entry of automobiles, Use of Bicycles/ Battery powered

vehicles , Pedestrian Friendly pathways , Ban on use of Plastic,
landscaping with trees and plants etc in 500 words
 Policy document on the green campus/plastic free campus.

 Geo-tagged photographs/videos of the facilities.
 Circulars and report of activities for the implementation of the
initiatives document
any)
7.1.6 Quality audits on environment and energy are regularly undertaken 5
QnM
by the institution
7.1.6.1.The institutional environment and energy initiatives are

confirmed through the following
1. Green audit / Environmental audit

2. Energy audit
3.Clean and green campus recognitions/awards
4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion and sustainability
activities
Options:
A. All of the above


 Policy document on environment and energy usage Certificate from
the auditing agency.
 Certificates of the awards received from recognized agency (if any).
 Report on environmental promotion and sustainability activities
conducted beyond the campus with geo-tagged photographs with
caption and date.
 Green audit/environmental audit report from recognized bodies
any)
92
7.1.7 The Institution has Differently-abled (Divyangjan) friendly, barrier 5

QlM
free environment
Write description covering the various components of barrier free

environment in your institution in maximum of 500 words
 Built environment with Ramps/lifts for easy access to

classrooms
 Divyangjan friendly washrooms
 Signage including tactile path, lights, display boards and
signposts
 Assistive technology and facilities for Divyangjan accessible
website, screen-reading software, mechanized equipment
 Provision for enquiry and information: Human assistance,
reader, scribe, soft copies of reading material, screen reading
File Description

Inclusion and Situatedness

7.1.8 Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive 5
QlM
environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional,
linguistic, communal socioeconomic and such other diversities
(within 500 words).
Provide Web link to:

 Supporting documents on the information provided (as reflected in
the administrative and academic activities of the Institution)
 Any other relevant information.
Human Values and Professional Ethics
7.1.9 Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the 4

QlM
constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities
of citizens
Describe the various activities in the Institution for inculcating values

for being responsible citizens as reflected in the Constitution of India
within 500 words.
Provide web link to:

 Details of activities that inculcate values necessary to nurture
students to become responsible citizens
93
7.1.10 The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, 5

QnM
teachers, administrators and other staff and conducts periodic
programmes in this regard.
1. The institutional Code of Conduct principles are displayed

on the website
2. There is a committee to monitor adherence to the
institutional Code of Conduct principles
3. Institution organizes professional ethics programmes for
students, teachers, administrators and other staff
4. Annual awareness programmes on Code of Conduct are
organized
Options:
A. All of the above


 Policy document on code of ethics.
 Constitution and proceedings of the monitoring committee.
 Circulars and geo-tagged photographs with date and caption of the
activities organized under this metric for teachers, students,
administrators and other staff.
 Document showing the Code of Conduct for students, teachers,
governing body and administration as approved by the competent
authority.
 Handbooks, manuals and brochures on human values and
professional ethics
 Report on the student attributes facilitated by the Institution
any)
Key Indicator - 7.2 Best Practices (30)
7.2.1 Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the 30
QlM
Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual.
Note: Format for the Presentation of Institutional Best Practices

1. Title of the Practice
The title/s should capture the keywords that describe the practice.
94
2. Objectives of the Practice
What are the objectives/intended outcomes of this “best practice” and what are
the underlying principles or concepts of this practice? (in about100words)
3. The Context
What were the contextual features or challenging issues that needed to be

addressed in designing and implementing this practice? (in about 150 words)
4. The Practice
Describe the practice and its uniqueness in the context of Indian higher
education. What were the constraints/limitations, if any, faced?(in about
400words)
5. Evidence of Success
Provide evidence of success such as performance against targets and

benchmarks, review/results. What do these results indicate? Describe in about
200words.
6. Problems Encountered and Resources Required
Please identify the problems encountered and resources required to implement

the practice (inabout150words).
7. Notes (Optional)
Please add any other information that may be relevant for

adopting/implementing the Best Practice in other Institutions (in about 150
words).
Any other information regarding Institutional Values and Best Practices which
the university would like to include.
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20)
Metri Metric Weigh

c No. tage
7.3.1 Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its 20
Ql M priority and thrust within 1000 words
Provide web link to:
 Appropriate webpage in the Institutional website
95
5. Evaluative Report of the Departments

Name of the Autonomous College………………………………
Name of the Department…………
Dist.…………………………. State………………………………..
Total Number of Departments in the institution…...............................
Sl. Name of the Department For Ex: Bio-

Zoology
No. English Technology
1. Year of Establishment
2. Is the Department part of a
School/Faculty of the Autonomous
College
3. Names of programmes offered
4. Number of teaching posts
Sanctioned/Filled
5. Number of Research Projects:
96
Total grants received

6. Inter –institutional collaborative projects and
Associated grants received
National collaboration
International collaboration
7. Departmental projects funded by DST-
FIST, UGC-SAP/CAS,DPE, DBT,
ICSSR, AICTE etc., : Total grants
received
8. Special research laboratories sponsored
by / created by industry or corporate
bodies
9. Publications:
Number of Papers published
Number of Books with ISBN
Number of Citation Index – range /
average
Number of Impact Factor – range /
average
Number of h-index
10. Details of patents and income generated
11. Areas of consultancy and income
generated
12. Awards/Recognitions received at the National
and International level by :
Faculty
Doctoral/Post doctoral fellows
Students
13. How many students have cleared Civil
Services and Defense Services
examinations, NET, SET (SLET), GATE
and other competitive examinations
14. List of doctoral, post-doctoral students
and research associates
From the host institution/university
From other institutions/universities
15. Number of Research Scholars/ Post
Graduate students getting financial
assistance from the University/State/
Central
Note: Compile data for the last five years
97
Declaration by the Head of the Institution
I certify that the data included in this Self-Study Report (SSR) are true
to the best of my knowledge.
This SSR is prepared by the institution after internal discussions, and no

part thereof has been outsourced.
I am aware that the Peer Team will validate the information

provided in this SSR during the peer team visit.
Signature of the Head of the institution with

seal:
Place:
Date:
98
Section C: Appendices
1. Glossary & Notes
2. Abbreviations
99
Appendix 1: Glossary& Notes

GLOSSARY
Academic : An exercise which serves to provide assurance that the delegated responsibilities
Audit for quality and standards of academic provision are being appropriately
discharged.
Academic : The schedule of the institution for the academic year, giving details of all academic
Calendar and administrative events.
Academic : Choice offered to the students in the curriculum offering and the curriculum
Flexibility transactions.
Accreditation : Certification of quality that is valid for a fixed period, which in the case of NAAC
is five years
Advanced : Students who perform very much better than the class averages
Learners
Assessment : Performance evaluation of an institution or its units based on certain established
criteria
Assessors : Trained academics or experts who represent NAAC on peer teams.
Attainment of : COs are to be attained by all students at the end of a formal course. While the
Course method of computation of attainment of COs is not unique, each institution has to
Outcomes follow a well-defined direct method of computing CO attainment based on the
(COs) student performance in all assessment instruments, and indirect method of
computing COs through course exit survey of students
Benchmarks : An example of good performance that serves as a standard for comparison of
one‟s own performance. It is a technique in which an institution measures its
performance against that of the best of others.
Bibliometrics : is a statistical analysis of written publications, such as books or articles
Blended : A mixing of different learning environments such as traditional face-to-face
Learning classroom methods with modern computer-mediated activities.
Bridge : A teaching module which helps to close the gap between two levels of
Course competence.
Carbon : A term used to describe fuels that neither contribute to nor reduce the amount of
Neutral carbon(measured in the release of carbon dioxide)into the atmosphere.
Catering to : The strategies adopted by institution to fulfill the needs of a heterogeneous group
Student of students.
Diversity
CEC (Under : Career Education Centre
Graduate)
Choice Based : A mode of learning in higher education which facilitates a student to have some
Credit System freedom in selecting his/her own choices, across various disciplines for
(CBCS) completing a UG / PG program. All UG and PG programs, as per UGC, have to
implement CBCS
Citation : The number of times a research papers is referred to by other researchers in
Index refereed journals, and is a measure of validity of its contents.
Co- : Activities, which support the curriculum such as field trips, display of academic
CurricularAct achievements, quiz, debate, discussion, seminars, role-play, etc
ivities
100
Collaboration : Formal agreement/understanding between any two or more institutions for

training, research, student/ faculty exchange or extension support.
Completion : The ratio of the total number of learners successfully completing a course/
Rates(course/) graduating from a programme in a given year to the total number of learners who
initially enrolled on the course/programme.
Constituencies : All the academic, administrative and support units of the institution.
Counseling : Assisting and mentoring students individually or collectively for academic,
career, personal and financial decision-making.
Course : A course is a unit of 2 to 6 credits in a formal program. A 3-credit course will
have three classroom sessions of one-hour duration during each week for the
entire semester. Example: Program: BA Economics; Course: Kerala Economy;
Credits: 3:0:1
Course : COs are statements that describe what students should be able to do at the end of
Outcomes a course. They can be 6±2 for courses with 2 to 4 credits, and 8±2 for courses
(COs) with 5 to 6 credits. (examples are given in the “Notes”)
Course : List of the course modules, similar to a table of contents in a book or the outline
Outlines used for writing papers. The outline defines the scope and content of the course.
Course : Details of classes being offered, its time, location, faculty, and its unique number
Schedule which students must know in order to register. The course schedule is published
prior to the commencement of registration for each semester / session.
Credit : A credit system is a systematic way of describing an educational programme by
attaching credits to its components. University Grants Commission defines one
credit as
1 Theory period of one hour per week over a semester
1 Tutorial period of one hour per week over a semester
1 Practical period of two hour per week over a semester
Criteria : Pre-determined standards of functioning of an institution of higher education
that form the basis of assessment and accreditation as identified/defined by
NAAC.
Cross Cutting : Cross cutting issues refer to the abilities of students to have sufficient disciplinary
Issues knowledge, to engage in public discussions on related issues; are careful
consumers of scientific and technological information related to their everyday
lives; are able to continue to learn outside school; and have the skills to enter
careers of their choice.
Curriculum : Process of defining the contents of units of study and usually obtained through
Design and needs assessment, feedback from stakeholders and expert groups. Curriculum
Development design and curriculum development are procedures which are closely linked to
the description of learning outcomes.
Cycles of : An institution undergoing the accreditation process by NAAC for the first time is
Accreditation said to be in Cycle1and the consecutive five year periods as Cycle2, 3 and so on.
Dare : Provides access to world wide information on social science, peace, and human
Database- rights research and training institutes, social science specialists, and social science
International periodicals.
Social
Sciences
Directory
Dual degree : Pursuing two different university degrees in parallel, either at the same institution
101
or at different institutions (sometimes indifferent countries),completing them in

less time than it would take to earn them separately.
EBSCO host : Is an online reference resource with designed to cater to user needs and
preferences at every level of research, with over 350 full text and secondary
databases available.
Eco system : Eco system for innovation comprises of material resources (funds, equipment,
for facilities, etc.) and the human resources (students, faculty, staff, industry
Innovations representatives, etc.) and linkages among them that make up the institutional
entities to promote the development of products and systems that are likely to
have significant economic value.
E-learning : Learning resources available on Internet
Resources
e-PG : High quality, curriculum-based, interactive content in different subjects across all
Pathshala disciplines of social sciences, arts, fine arts & humanities, natural & mathematical
sciences, linguistics and languages developed under the initiative of MHRD,
under its National Mission on Education through ICT (NMEICT) Mission.
http://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in/
e- : Shodhganga@INFLIBNET provides a platform for research students to deposit
Shodhganga their Ph.D. theses and make it available to the entire scholarly community in open
access.
e-Shodh : e-Shodh Sindhu (https://www.inflibnet.ac.in/ess) provides current as well as
Sindhu archival access to more than 15,000 core and peer-reviewed journals and a
number of bibliographic, citation and factual databases in different disciplines
from a large number of publishers and aggregators to its member institutions
including centrally-funded technical institutions.
Elective : A choice available to students to select from among a large number of subjects.
Courses
Emerging : New areas of study and research deemed important to pursue. These areas may
Areas have been identified by national agencies or international bodies.
Enrichment : Value added courses offered by institution for student empowerment. They
Courses enhance the curriculum by amplifying, supplementing and replacing such parts
or features as have become ineffective or obsolete.
Evaluation : Assessment of learning, teaching and evaluation process and reforms to increase
Process and the efficiency and effectiveness of the system.
Reforms
Examination : Examination management system is a well-defined document or a software

Management application for the planning, administration, documentation, tracking, evaluation
System of students responses, and announcement of grades/marks obtained by students in
all formal learning activities in an educational program
Experiential : Is a process of learning through experience and is more specifically defined as
Learning “learning through reflection on doing”.
Extension : The aspect of education, which emphasizes neighbourhood services. These are
Activities often integrated with curricula as extended opportunities intended to help, serve
102
reflect and learn. The curriculum- extension interface has educational values,
especially in rural India.
Faculty : Programs aimed at updating the knowledge and pedagogical skills of faculty.
Development
Program
Feedback : Formative and evaluative comments given by tutors on the performance of
individual learners.
Evaluative comments made by stakeholders to the institution on the quality and
effectiveness of a defined process.
Response from students, academic peers and employers for review and design of
curriculum.
Field Project : Formal projects students need to undertake that involve conducting surveys
outside the college/university premises and collection of data from designated
communities or natural places
Financial : Budgeting and optimum utilization of financial resources.
Management
Flexibility : A mechanism through which students have wider choices of Programmes to
choose from, as well as, multiple entry and exit points for Programmes /courses.
Functional : Memoranda of Understanding that are currently operational, signed by the
MoUs Institute with national and international agencies
Full Time : A teacher employed for at least 90 per cent of the normal or statutory number of
Teachers hours of work for a full-time teacher over a complete academic year is classified
as a full-time teacher.
Gender Audit : A tool and a process based on a methodology to promote organizational
learning at the individual, work unit and organizational levels on how to
practically and effectively main stream gender.
Graduate : The disciplinary expertise or technical knowledge that has traditionally formed the
Attributes core of most university courses. They are qualities that also prepare graduates as
agents for social good in an unknown future.
Green Audit : The process of assessing the environmental impact of an organization, process,
project, product, etc
Grievance : Mechanisms for receiving, processing and addressing dissatisfaction expressed,
Redressal complaints and other formal requests made by learners, staff and other
stakeholders on the institutional provisions promised and perceived.
H-index : An index that attempts to measure both the productivity and impact of the
(HirschIndex) published work of a scientist or scholar. The index is based on the set of the
scientist‟s most cited papers and the number of citations that they have received
in other publications.
Human : The process of assessing the human power requirements, recruiting, monitoring
Resource the growth and appraising them periodically and plan the staff development
Management programs for the professional development and provide the necessary incentives
and feedback.
Humanities : A comprehensive database covering journals, books and reference sources in the
International humanities. This database provides citation information for articles, essays and
Complete reviews, as well as original creative works including poems and fiction.
Photographs, painting and illustrations are also referenced
ICT : Information and Communication Technology Consists of the hardware, software,
networks and media for the collection, storage, processing, transmission and
103
presentation of information (voice, data, text, images) as well as related services.

Impact factor : A measure of the citations to science and social sciences journals. The impact
(IF) factor for a journal is calculated based on a three-year period and can be
considered to be the average number of times published papers are cited up to 2
years after publication.
Inclusion, : Inclusiveness in educational institutions refers to the educational experiences
Inclusiveness practiced with reference to gender, ethnicity, social class and differently abled.
INFLIBNET : Information and Library Network Centre maintains a database on books, theses
Database and serials
Infrastructure : Physical facilities like building, playfields, hostels etc. Which help run an
institutional Programme.
Institutional : IIQA is a requirement, which needs to be submitted online by all categories of
Information HEIs
for Quality
Assessment
(IIQA)
Institutional : Institutional distinctiveness is characterized by its reason for coming to
Distinctivenes existence, vision, mission, nature of stakeholders, access to resources, cultural
s ambience and physical location
Institutional : Focuses on the institution‟s responsibilities to the public in terms of protection
Social of public health, safety and the environment, the public ethical behaviour and the
Responsibilit need to practice good citizenship.
y (ISR)
Interdisciplin : An integrative approach in which information from more than one discipline is
ary research used in interpreting the content of a subject, phenomenon, theory or principle.
Internal : Forming Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) is to be established in every
Quality accredited institution as a post-accreditation quality sustenance measure.
Assurance http://www.naac.gov.in/IQAC.asp
Cell (IQAC)
Internal : Self regulated responsibilities of the higher education institutions aimed at
Quality continuous improvement of quality for achieving academic and administrative
Assurance excellence.
System(IQAS
)
Internship : A designated activity that carries some credits involving more than 25 days of
working in an organization under the guidance of an identified mentor
ISO : ISO 9001 certification enhances customer satisfaction by meeting customer
Certification requirements. The institution is able to provide right services. ISO certification
enhances functional efficiency of an organization.
Leadership : Term used for setting direction and create a student- focused, learning oriented
climate, clear and visible values and high expectation by ensuring the creation of
strategies, system and methods for achieving excellence, stimulating innovation
and building knowledge and capabilities
Learning : A learning management system (LMS) is a software application for the
Management administration, documentation, tracking, reporting and delivery of educational
Systems courses or training Programmes. They help the instructor deliver material to the
students, administer tests and other assignments, track student progress, and
104
manage record-keeping. MOODLE is an example of open source LMS

Learning : Specific intentions of a Programme or module, written in clear terms. They
Outcomes describe what a student should know, understand, or be able to do at the end of
that Programme or module
Library as a : The library holdings in terms of titles of books, journals and other learning
Learning materials and technology aided learning mechanism, which enable the students to
Resource acquire information, knowledge and skills required for their study.
Levels of :  Programme Outcomes: POs are statements that describe what the
Outcomes students graduating from any of the educational Programmes should be
able to do.
 Course Outcomes: COs are statements that describe what students

should be able to do at the end of a course
New : Digital tools and resources (hardware and software) and their application in
Technologies the field of education.
NIRF : National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), approved by the MHRD,
outlines a methodology to rank institutions across the country. The
parameters and sub-parameters associated with this mechanism are evolving
from year to year.
https://www.nirfindia.org/Docs/Ranking_Methodology_And_Metrics_2017.p
df
N-LIST : N-LIST stands for "National Library and Information services Infrastructure for
Scholarly Content". http://nlist.inflibnet.ac.in/faq.php
OBE: : OBE is an educational theory that bases each part of an educational system
Outcome around goals (outcomes). Each student should have achieved the goal by the end
Based of the educational experience
Education
Open : Educational materials and resources offered freely and openly for anyone to
Educational use and under some licenses to re-mix, improve and redistribute.
Resources
Optimum : The infrastructure facilities are made available to the student for their
Utilizationof maximum utilization. e.g. Extended hours for computer center and library,
Infrastructure sharing of facilities for interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary Programmes.
Organogram : Organogram is the word, a diagram that shows the structure of an organization
and the relationships between the relative ranks of its part and position/ job. It is
also known as Organisational Structure.
Outcome : An outcome of an educational Programme is what the student should be able to
do at the end of a Programme/ course/ instructional unit.
Outreach : Is the practice of conducting local public awareness activities through targeted
Activities community interaction
Participative : Participatory Learning and Action is a family of approaches, methods, attitudes,
Learning behaviours and relationships, which enable and empower people to share, analyze
and enhance their knowledge of their life and conditions, and to plan, act,
monitor, evaluate and reflect.
105
Participative : Refers to an open form of management where employees are actively involved in
Management the institution‟s decision making process.
Perspective : Is a blue print regarding the objective sand targets of long term growth
Development
Physical : Infrastructure facilities of the institution to run the educational Programmes
Facilities efficiently and the growth of the infrastructure to keep pace with the academic
growth of the institution.
Policy for : Processes defined by the institution to facilitate the teachers to write research
Promotion of proposals, seek funding, conduct research, publish, and evaluate and reward the
Research research done.
Pre-qualifiers : For the Assessment and Accreditation (A&A) in revised framework the NAAC
has proposed a pre-qualifier test. It is a condition for peer team visit and will be
based on Institutional system generated score (SGS) in all QnM after undergoing
DVV process. As a Pre-qualifier, the institution should score at least 30% in
Quantitative Metrics (QnM) as per the final score after the DVV Process. If the
HEI does not clear the Pre-qualifier stage then they will have to apply afresh by
submitting the IIQA and its fees.
Problem : Is a student-centred pedagogy in which students learn about a subject through the
Based experience of solving an open-ended problem found in trigger material. The PBL
Learning process does not focus on problem solving with a defined solution, but it allows
(PBL) for the development of other desirable skills and attributes. This includes
knowledge acquisition, enhanced group collaboration and communication.
Programme : A range of learning experiences offered to students in a formal manner over a
period of one-to-four years leading to certificates/ diplomas/ degrees. Examples:
BA (Economics) BSc (Physics). All possible formal degree Programmes are
identified by UGC
Programme : A range of courses offered to students to choose at various levels leading to
Options degrees/ diplomas/ certificates.
Programme : Programme Outcomes (POs) are what knowledge, skills and attitudes a graduate
Outcomes should have at the time of graduation. While no agency has formally defined the
POs of General Higher Education 3-year degree Programmes in India, POs of all
professional Programmes in engineering and other areas are identified at national
level by the concerned accrediting agency. POs are not specific to a discipline.
Promotion of : The process of promoting research culture among faculty and students by
Research and facilitating faculty and student participation in research budget allocation, research
Research fellowship and other faculties.
Support
System
Remedial : Courses offered to academically disadvantaged students in order to help them
Courses cope with academic requirements.
Research : Systematic intellectual investigations aimed at discovering, interpreting and
revising human knowledge.
Research : Grant generated/received from different agencies by the institution for conducting
Grant research projects.
Research : Quality research outcome beneficial for the discipline, society, industry and
Output dissemination of knowledge including theoretical and practical findings.
Resource : Generation of funds through internal and external sources such as donations,
Mobilization consultancy, self-financing courses and so on.
106
SCOPUS : The world‟s largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and
quality web sources.
Seed money : Funds provided to a teacher or a group of teachers by the institution to get the
for Research research initiated to facilitate the preparation of formal research proposal for
funding.
Situatedness : Situatedness refers to involvement within a context. It also refers to placement of
learning experiences in authentic contexts or settings
SJR (SCI : This takes three years of publication data into account to assign relative scores to
mago Journal all the sources (journal articles, conference proceedings, review articles, etc.) in a
Rank) citation network (Journals in SCOPUS database).
Slow Learners : Students who perform very much below the class averages
SNIP(Source : Is the ratio of the source‟s average citation count per paper in a three year citation
Normalized window over the “citation potential” of its subject field?
Impact per
Person)
Stakeholder : Affiliation and interaction with groups or individuals who have an interest in the
Relationship actions of the institutions and the ability to influence its actions, decisions,
policies, practices or goals of the organization.
Strategic Plan : A specific, action-oriented medium or long-term plan for making progress
towards a set of institutional goals.
Strategy : Formulation of objectives, directives and guidelines with specific plans for
Development institutional development.
Student : Methods of instruction that focus on products of learning by the students
Centric
Methods
Student : The student community of the institution, their strength and the diversity in terms
Profile of economic and social strata, location and other demographic aspects such as
gender, age, religion, caste, rural/ urban.
Student : Vertical movement of students from one level of education to the next higher
Progression level successfully or towards gainful employment.
Student : Facilitating mechanism for access to information fee structure and refund policies
Support and also guidance and placement cell with student welfare measures to give
necessary learning support to the students.
SWAYAM : SWAYAM is a Programme initiated by Government of India and designed to
achieve the three cardinal principles of Education Policy viz., access, equity and
quality. https://swayam.gov.in/
Teacher : A composite term to indicate the qualification of the faculty, the adequacy
Quality meant for recruitment procedures, professional development, recognition and
teachers characteristics.
Twinning : An arrangement between two institutions where a provider in source country A
Programmes collaborates with a provider in Country B to allow students to take course credits
in Country B and/or in source Country A. Only one qualification is awarded by
the provider in source Country A. Arrangements for twinning Programmes and
awarding of degrees usually comply with national regulations of the provider in
source Country A.
107
Value Added : Courses of varying durations which are optional, and offered outside the
Courses curriculum that add value and helping them students in getting placed.
NOTES
It is considered necessary to provide some exemplars for the different levels of learning
outcomes at higher education level. While no agency has defined the POs of General Higher
Education three year programme in India, POs of all professional Programes in engineering and other
areas are identified at the national level by the concerned accrediting agency. Given below is set of
POs of an engineering Programme identified by National Board of Accreditation (NBA). In respect
of COs, examples from science and social science disciplines are given. These are not comprehensive
or exhaustive. But, they point out the manner in which these outcomes can be stated for any
educational Programme/course. In case the HEI has these already stated, they may be submitted;
however, if at any of these three levels outcomes are not listed, they may be developed and uploaded
in Institutional website.
Sample for
Credits 1 Theory period of one hour per week over a semester
1 Tutorial period of one hour per week over a semester
1 Practical period of two hour per week over a semester
Programme For Every degree Programme broad expectations should be listed by the
Outcomes
University. Examples are given below from NBA for an Engineering
Degree Programme.
PO1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics,
science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering
specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and
analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated
conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences,
and engineering sciences.
PO3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex
engineering problems and design system components or processes
that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the
public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and
environmental considerations.
108
PO4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-

based knowledge and research methods including design of
experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of
the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate
techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools
including prediction and modeling to complex engineering
activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the
contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and
cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
PO7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the
professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development.
PO8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics
and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
PO9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual,
and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in
multidisciplinary settings.
PO10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex
engineering activities with the engineering community and with
society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective
presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and
understanding of the engineering and management principles and
apply these to one‟s own work, as a member and leader in a team,
to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the
preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long
109
learning in the broadest context of technological change.
POs of General Higher Education Programmes should be identified

by the University/Autonomous College offering the three year
Programmes
Sample POs of General Higher Education Programmes: Students of all

undergraduate general degree Programmes at the time of graduation will
be able to
PO1.Critical Thinking: Take informed actions after identifying the
assumptions that frame our thinking and actions, checking out the
degree to which these assumptions are accurate and valid, and
looking at our ideas and decisions (intellectual, organizational, and
personal) from different perspectives.
PO2.Effective Communication: Speak, read, write and listen clearly in
person and through electronic media in English and in one Indian
language, and make meaning of the world by connecting people,
ideas, books, media and technology.
PO3. Social Interaction: Elicit views of others, mediate disagreements
and help reach conclusions in group settings.
PO4. Effective Citizenship: Demonstrate empathetic social concern and
equity centred national development, and the ability to act with an
informed awareness of issues and participate in civic life through
volunteering.
PO5. Ethics: Recognize different value systems including your own,
understand the moral dimensions of your decisions, and accept
responsibility for them.
PO6. Environment and Sustainability: Understand the issues of
environmental contexts and sustainable development.
PO7. Self-directed and Life-long Learning: Acquire the ability to
engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest
context socio-technological changes
110
Course Outcomes Sample COs of the course “Animal Diversity – Non Chordata”
CO1 Describe general taxonomic rules on animal classification

CO2 Classify Protista up to phylum using examples from parasitic
adaptation
CO3 Classify Phylum Porifera with taxonomic keys
CO4 Describe the phylum Coelenterata and its polymorphism
CO5 Write down the life history of Fasciola and its classification
CO6 Describe Phylum Nematoda and give examples of pathogenic
Nematodes
CO7 Identify the characters of Phylum Annelida with its classification
CO8 Write down the classification and characteristics of Phylum
Arthropoda
CO9 Identify the given Mollusca with respect to economic importance
CO10 Write down the classification and characteristics of Phylum
Echinodermata, Phylum Hemichordata and minor phylas
Appendix 2: Abbreviations
A&A (A/A) - Assessment and Accreditation

AC - Academic Council
ACM - Associates of Computing Machinery
AMC - Annual Maintenance Contract
AVRC - Audio-Visual Research Centre
AICTE - All India Council for Technical Education
AQAR - Annual Quality Assurance Report
BoS - Board of Studies
BCUD - Board of College and University Development
CAL - Computer Aided Learning
CAS - Center for Advanced Studies
CAT - Common Aptitude Test
CBCS - Choice Based Credit System
CD - Compact Diskette
CDC - College Development Council
CEC - Consortium for Educational Communication
CGPA - Cumulative Grade Point Average
Cr - Criteria
Cr-GPA(s) - Criterion-wise Grade Point Average(s)
COHSSIP - Committee for Humanities and Social Science Improvement Programme
111
COSIP - Committee for Science Improvement Programme

COSIST - Committee for Strengthening of Infrastructure Improvement Programme in
Science and Technology
CSA - Centre for Social Action
CSIR - Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
CPE - Colleges with Potential for Excellence
DELNET - Developing Library Network
DEP - Distance Education Programmes
DRS - Departmental Research Support of UGC
DSA - Departmental Special Assistance of UGC
DST - Department of Science and Technology
EMRC - Educational Multimedia Research Centre
FIST - Fund for the Improvement of Science and Technology Infrastructure
GATE - Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering
GATS - General Agreement on Trade in Services
GMAT - Graduate Management Admission Test
GRE - Graduate Record Examination
IAS - Indian Administrative Services
ICHR - Indian Council of Historical Research
ICPR - Indian Council of Philosophical Research
ICSSR - Indian Council of Social Science Research
ICT - Information and Communication Technology
IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
IIQA - Institutional Information for Quality Assessment
IQAC - Internal Quality Assurance Cell
IQAS - Internal Quality Assurance System
INFLIBNET - Information and LibraryNetwork
INQAAHE - International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education
INSA - Indian National Science Academy
IPR - Intellectual Property Rights
ISR - Institutional Social Responsibility
IUC - Inter University Centre
KI - Key Indicator
KI-GP(s) - Key Indicator-wise Grade Point(s)
MHRD - Ministry of Human Resource and Development
MoC - Memorandum of Contract
MoU - Memorandum of Understanding
MIR - Minimum Institutional Requirements
MIS - Management Information System
NCTE - National Council for Teacher Education
NET - National Eligibility Test
NGO - Non Governmental Organization
NME-ICT - National Mission on Education through Information and Technology
NPE - National Policy Education
NPTEL - National Programmed Teaching Enhanced Learning
112
OMR - Optical Mark Recognition

OPAC - Online Public Access Catalogue
PTR - Peer Team Report
QAA - Quality Assurance Agency
SAP - Special Assistance Programme
SET/SLET - State Level Eligibility Test
SJR - SCI mago Journal Rank
SLQACC - State Level Quality Assurance Co-ordination Committee
SNIP - Source Normalized Impact per Paper
SSR - Self-Study Report
SWOC - Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges
TEI - Teacher Education Institution
TOEFL - Test of English as a Foreign Language
UGC - University Grants Commission
UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNO - United Nation Organization
UNICEF - United Nations Children Educational Foundation
UNDP - United Nation Development Programme
USIC - University Science Instrumentation Centre
Wi-Fi - Wireless Fidelity
YRC - Youth Red Cross
113
For Communication with NAAC

The Director
National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC)
(An Autonomous Institution of the University Grants Commission)
P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru- 560 072

Phone: + 91-08-2321 0261/62/63/64/65
Fax: + 91-08-2321 0268, 2321 0270
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.naac.gov.in
114
115

Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

I deem it a privilege to acknowledge the immense contribution made by the team of

21st December 2022 (S. C. Sharma)

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

CONTENTS Page No.

SECTION B: Data Requirements for Self - Study Report (SSR)

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

SECTION A: GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT AND

This Section presents the NAAC framework for Assessment and

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

Vision and Mission

The vision of NAAC is:

 To arrange for periodic assessment and accreditation of institutions of higher

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

Throughout the world, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) function in a dynamic

(i) Contributing to National Development

(ii) Fostering Global Competencies among Students

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

(iii) Inculcating a Value System among Students

(iv) Promoting the Use of Technology

In addition to using technology as a learning resource, managing the activities of the

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

(v) Quest for Excellence

Contributing to nation-building and skills development of students, HEIs should

II. ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Revised Assessment and Accreditation(A&A)Framework

III. QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF) - DESCRIPTION

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

Criterion I: - Curricular Aspects

Criterion I pertains to the practices of an institution in initiating a wide range of

The focus of Criterion I is captured in the following Key Indicators:

1.1*(U) -Curriculum Design and Development

*(U) - applicable only for Universities and Autonomous Colleges

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

1.1 *(U) Curriculum Design and Development

One of the significant responsibilities of Universities and Autonomous Colleges is

Curriculum evolved by the University/Autonomous College comprises Programme

1.1 *(A) Curricular Planning and Implementation

1.2 Academic Flexibility

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

Holistic development of students is the main purpose of curriculum. While this is

1.4 Feedback System

The process of revision and redesign of curricula is based on recent developments

Criterion II: - Teaching Learning and Evaluation

Criterion II pertains to the efforts of an institution to serve students of different

The focus of Criterion II is captured in the following Key Indicators:

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile

The process of admitting students to the programmes is through a transparent,

2.2 Catering to Student Diversity

2.3 Teaching-Learning Process

Diversity of learners in respect of their background, abilities and other personal

2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality

“Teacher quality” is a composite term to indicate the quality of teachers in terms of

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education

2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms

2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey

Criterion III: - Research, Innovations and Extension

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education