0% found this document useful (0 votes)
193 views10 pages

CHAPTER 4 Research Methodology

The research was conducted in Colegio San Agustin Makati by research students to establish a connection between senior high school strands (STEM, HUMSS, ABM, GAS) and college program preference. Data was collected from 264 grade 12 students across the four strands using surveys. The data is presented through tables, bar graphs and pie charts to understand responses to questions about strand preference, influences on choice, and plans after graduation.

Uploaded by

Sophia Bianca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
193 views10 pages

CHAPTER 4 Research Methodology

The research was conducted in Colegio San Agustin Makati by research students to establish a connection between senior high school strands (STEM, HUMSS, ABM, GAS) and college program preference. Data was collected from 264 grade 12 students across the four strands using surveys. The data is presented through tables, bar graphs and pie charts to understand responses to questions about strand preference, influences on choice, and plans after graduation.

Uploaded by

Sophia Bianca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

The research was conducted in Colegio San Agustin Makati by research students of 10-I

Augustinian Year 2017-2018. Having 24 students per section as the population, this research

aims to establish a connection between senior high school strands and college program

preference. The research in turn will benefit the school’s outlook on the senior high school

strands. Lastly, the participants of this research are the grade 12 students of all four academic

strands, namely STEM, HUMSS, ABM, and GAS, Augustinian Year 2017-2018.

For this question, a tabular would be best fit to understand the given data for question

number 1 which is a semantic differential type of question.

TABLE 1:

STRAND GAS ABM STEM HUMSS

STRONGLY AGREE 3 (12.5%) 16 (16.67%) 15 (15.63%) 4 (8.33%)

AGREE 9 (37.5%) 42 (43.75%) 20 (20.83%) 24 (50%)

NEUTRAL 11 (45.83%) 25 (26.04%) 26 (27.08%) 17 (35.41%)

DISAGREE 1 (4.17%) 8 (8.33%) 21 (21.88%) 2 (4.17%)

STRONGLY DISAGREE 0 (0%) 5 (5.21%) 14 (14.58%) 1 (2.08%)

TOTAL NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS 24 96 96 48


For this question, a tabular would be best fit to understand the given data for question

number 1 which is a semantic differential type of question.

TABLE 2:

STRAND NO. OF RESPONDENTS

STEM 96

GAS 24

ABM 96

HUMSS 48

TOTAL 264

For this question, a bar graph would be best fit to understand the given data for question

number 3 which is an ordinal type of question.

GRAPH 3.1: GAS

40

35

30

25
1st Choice
20 2nd Choice
3rd Choice
15 4th Choice

10

0
Family Friends Academic Performance Financial Status

GRAPH 3.2: ABM


60

50

40

1st Choice
30 2nd Choice
3rd Choice
4th Choice
20

10

0
Family Friends Academic Performance Financial Status GRAPH 3.3: HUMSS

40

35

30

25

20 1st Choice
15 2nd Choice
3rd Choice
10 4th Choice

0
Family Friends Academic PerformanceFinancial Status

GRAPH 3.4: STEM

60

50

40

1st Choice
30 2nd Choice
3rd Choice
4th Choice
20

10

0
Family Friends Academic Performance Financial Status
For this question, a pie chart would be best fit to understand the given data for question number 4

which is a dichotomous type of question.

GRAPH 4.1: STEM

28

YES
NO
68

GRAPH 4.2: HUMSS

YES
NO

40

GRAPH 4.3: ABM

16

YES
NO

80

GRAPH 4.4: GAS

YES
NO

21
For this question, a pie chart would be best fit to understand the given data for question number 5

which is a dichotomous type of question.

GRAPH 5.1: STEM GRAPH 5.2: HUMSS

8
YES
NO
YES
NO

40
96

GRAPH 5.3: ABM GRAPH 5.4: GAS

YES YES
NO NO

24

91

For this question, a pie chart would be best fit to understand the given data for question number 6

which is a dichotomous type of question.

GRAPH 6.1: STEM GRAPH 6.2: ABM

17
5

YES
NO
YES NO

91

79
GRAPH 6.3: GAS GRAPH 6.4: HUMSS

YES YES
NO NO

43

23

For this question, a pie chart would be best fit to understand the given data for question number 7

which is a dichotomous type of question.

GRAPH 7.1: GAS GRAPH 7.2: ABM

21
6

YES YES
NO NO

18 75

GRAPH 7.3: STEM GRAPH 7.4: HUMSS

39
19
YES YES
NO NO
57 29
For this question type, a bar graph would be best fit to understand the given data as question 8 is

a cumulative type of question.

GRAPH 8:

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

GAS
30.00% ABM
STEM
HUMSS
20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
GRADES FAMILY FRIENDS LACK OF CHOICES

For this question, a pie chart would be best fit to understand the given data for question number 9

which is a dichotomous type of question.

GRAPH 9.1: GAS GRAPH 9.2: ABM

YES YES
NO NO

24 96
GRAPH 9.3: STEM GRAPH 9.4: HUMSS

1 5

For this
YES YES
NO NO

95 43

question, a pie chart would be best fit to understand the given data for question number 10 which

is a dichotomous type of question.

GRAPH 10.1: GAS GRAPH 10.2: ABM

20
7

YES YES
NO NO
17
76

GRAPH
10.3: STEM GRAPH 10.4: HUMSS

17
14

YES
YES NO
NO
34
79
DATA ANALYSIS:

1. Given the data, we can say that majority of GAS, STEM and HUMSS students are

neutral when asked if they agree with the K-12 Program. In addition to this, most of the

ABM students agree with the K-12 program. A reason for this is that K-12 aids them in

choosing their college program. Another reason could be that the strand they are in now

is related to their preferred college course.

2. Given the data, we can see the different number of respondents per strand. The main and

only reason for this is the number of students who chose that certain as strand.

3. . Given the data from GRAPH 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 we can say that most of the students

do not consider their financial status as a factor affecting their chosen strand. Moreover,

we can also see in GRAPH 2.4 that majority of the students consider family as their first

choice in their chosen strand.

4. Given the data from graphs 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4, we can say that majority of students are

performing well in their chosen strand. In contrast to this, a number of students said that

they are not performing well in their chosen strand, especially those in STEM (GRAPH

4.1). A factor could be that these students are having difficulty coping up with the

lessons. Another could be that pressure imposed on them as they are going into college

next year.

5. Given the data from graphs 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 we can say that majority of grade 12

students will go to college. A factor could be their need of conformity to society. Another

could be crave for success

6. Given the data, we can say that most of the SHS students have a preferred college course.
7. Given the data, we can say that most of the students’ choice for their college program

was not affected by their SHS strand

8. Given the data from table 8 we can say that most of the students in HUMSS chose their

college program due to lack of choice. In addition to this, family and grades were also big

factors to a STEM or ABM student’s decision in their college course. Lastly, grades

family and friends greatly affected a student’s decision for a college course.

9. Given the data from graphs 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, and 9.4, we can say that almost all of the SHS

students are aware that they are going to college next year.

10. Given the data from graphs 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4, we can say that most of the SHS

students’ strands are related to their preferred college course.

You might also like