FA7e Ch12 Solutions 081922
FA7e Ch12 Solutions 081922
FA7e Ch12 Solutions 081922
28-31, 33,
LO3 – Describe and analyze accounting
12, 13, 21-26 34, 36, 41- 59, 61 63-67
for passive investments.
43, 45-49
Q12-1. (a) Trading securities are reported at their fair value in the balance sheet. (b)
Available-for-sale securities are reported at their fair value in the balance sheet.
(c) Held-to-maturity securities are reported at their amortized cost in the
balance sheet.
Q12-2. An unrealized holding gain (loss) is an increase (decrease) in the fair value of
an asset (in this case, an investment security) that is still owned. Investments
in equity securities should be reported at their fair value on the balance sheet,
with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in income in the period that
they occur. There is a provision for non-marketable securities to use when the
cost of estimating fair value is prohibitively expensive.
Q12-3. Unrealized holding gains and losses related to trading securities are reported in
the current-year income statement (and also retained earnings). Unrealized
holding gains and losses related to available-for-sale debt securities are
reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity called Other
Comprehensive Income (OCI).
Q12-4. Significant influence gives the owner of the stock the ability to significantly
influence the operating and financing activities of the company whose stock is
owned. Normally, this is accomplished with a 20% through 50% ownership of
the company's voting stock.
The equity method is used to account for investments with significant influence.
Such an investment is initially recorded at cost; the investment is increased by
the proportionate share of the investee company's net income, and equity
income is reported in the income statement; the investment account is
decreased by dividends received on the investment; and the investment
account is reported in the balance sheet at its book value. Unrealized
appreciation in the market value of the investment is not recognized.
Q12-5. Yetman Company's investment in Livnat Company is an investment with
significant influence, and should, therefore, be accounted for using the equity
method. At year-end, the investment should be reported in the balance sheet at
$206,400 [$200,000 + (40% $64,000) - (40% x $48,000)].
Q12-6. A stock investment representing more than 50% of the investee company's
voting stock is generally viewed as conferring “control” over the investee
company. The investor and investee companies must be consolidated for
financial reporting purposes.
Q12-7. Consolidated financial statements attempt to portray the financial position,
operating results, and cash flows of affiliated companies as a single economic
unit so that the scope of the entire (whole) entity is more realistically conveyed.
LO 1
e. SI Even though Shevlin owns less than 20% of Bowen, the fact that it buys 60%
of Bowen’s output means it is capable of exercising significant influence. This
is a case where the facts and circumstances override the guidance based on
strict percentage ownership.
a. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value on the balance sheet. For
2020, this is equal to the amortized cost ($17,163 million) plus unrealized gains
($454 million) and less unrealized losses ($7 million), or $17,610 million.
Investments in equity securities must be reported at fair value, with all gains and losses
(realized and unrealized) recognized in income. Wu will report $11,050 of dividend
income plus income relating to the increase in the market price of the stock of $8,500
($13 - $12 price increase for 8,500 shares). Total investment income is $19,550.
a. All of these investments are marked to fair value, but the determination differs. Level
1 fair values are determined by reference to an active market where identical assets
are traded. Level 2 fair values are determined by using a model (discounted cash
flow, prices of similar assets, etc.) for which the inputs and assumptions can be found
from observable value. Level 3 fair values are also determined by using a model, but
the inputs and assumptions are not observable except to the reporting company.
b. All are marked-to-fair-value, but only Level 1 investments are marked-to-market, the
others are marked-to-model. Level 1 values would be the most objective since they
come from an active market. Level 3 would be most subjective because they depend
significantly on management’s judgments.
c. Level 1 assets are most liquid, because they are traded in active markets. Level 3
assets are likely to be least liquid because their value depends significantly on
information that is not publicly available.
a. Given the 30% ownership, “significant influence” is presumed and the investment
must be accounted for using the equity method. The year-end balance of the
investment account is computed as follows:
b. $45,000 ($150,000 0.3) - Equity earnings are computed as the reported net income
of the investee (Lang Company) multiplied by the percentage of the outstanding
common stock owned.
c. (1) In contrast to the market method, the equity method of accounting does not report
investments at market value. The unrealized gain of $300,000 is not reflected in
either the balance sheet or the income statement.
a.
1. Investment in Lang Company (+A) .................................................... 1,500,000
Cash (-A) ........................................................................................... 1,500,000
b.
+ Cash (A) - - Investment Income (R) +
1,500,000 1. 45,000 2.
3. 18,000
DeFond
Company DeFond DeFond
(before Company Verduzco Eliminating Company
investment) (after investment) Company Entries (Consolidated)
Current assets $ 1,000 $ 625 $ 125 $ 750
Investment – 375 – (375) –
Noncurrent assets 2,500 2,500 1,125 3,625
Liabilities 2,750 2,750 875 3,625
Shareholders’ 750 750 375 (375) 750
Equity
b. If DeFond purchases 50% of the common stock of Lin Company, it uses the equity
method.
a. Year 1
10/1 Investment in Skyline, Inc. (+A) ........................................................
874,800
Cash (-A) .....................................................................................874,800
Year 2
3/31 Cash (+A) ........................................................................................
31,500
Interest receivable (-A) ................................................................ 15,750
Interest revenue (+R, +SE) ......................................................... 15,750
a. Year 1
11/15 Investment in Lane, Inc. (+A) .................................................. 256,800
Cash (-A) ................................................................................. 256,800
Year 2
1/20 Cash (+A) ..........................................................................................
225,000
Loss on sale of investment in Lane, Inc. (+E, -SE) ........................... 7,500
Investment in Lane, Inc. (-A) ............................................................. 232,
500
b. Assuming the firm’s fiscal year ends 12/31, the unrealized loss of $24,300 is closed
to the income summary in Year 1, reducing net income and retained earnings.
+ Loss (E) -
1/20 7,500
-7,200
Unrealized
Gain-
AOCI
The main effect is to defer the gain in value experienced in Year 1 to the year Year 2.
a. Year 1
10/1 Investment in Skyline, Inc. (+A) ........................................................
874,800
Cash (-A) .....................................................................................874,800
Year 2
3/31 Cash (+A) ........................................................................................
31,500
Interest receivable (-A) ................................................................ 15,750
Interest revenue (+R, +SE) ......................................................... 15,750
b. Assuming the firm’s fiscal year ends 12/31, the unrealized gain of $7,200 in Skyline
Inc. bonds is closed to retained earnings in Year 1 increasing net income and
retained earnings.
Note that most of the gain occurred in Year 1, but was not recognized on the income
statement until management decided to sell the securities in Year 2.
Halen Inc. now owns all of Jolson. The company reports will be consolidated. The total
in the consolidated stockholder’s equity section on 1/1 is the stockholders’ equity
section of the parent company, determined as follows:
Common stock $480,000
Retained earnings 248,000
Total Equity $728,000
Jolson’s equity accounts are eliminated in the consolidation process.
a.
Balance Sheet Income Statement
Cash Noncash Liabil- Contrib. Earned Net
Transaction Asset + Assets = ities + Capital + Capital Revenues - Expenses = Income
1. Purchase bonds for -610,000 +610,000 = =
$610,000 Cash Investment
b.
+12,000
2. Receive interest +12,000 = +12,000 = +12,000
Retained
payment of Cash Interest
Earnings
$12,000 Income
+6,000
3. Year-end +6,000 = =
AOCI
market price of Investment
bonds is
$616,000
+12,000
4a. Receive +12,000 = +12,000 = +12,000
Retained
interest Cash Interest
Earnings
payment of Income
$12,000
+2,000
4b. Sell bonds for +612,000 -616,000 = +2,000 = +2,000
Retained
$612,000 Cash Investment Realized
Earnings
Holding
-6,000 Gain
AOCI
a. Trading securities
(i.)
(ii.)
(ii.)
a. The annual growth rates in revenues are (110,360/96,571)-1 = 14.3% for 2018 and
(96,571/91,154)-1 = 5.9% for 2017. The cumulative average growth rate (CAGR) is
(110,360/91,154)^0.5 - 1 = 10.0%.
As a result, the growth trends over this period intermix the “organic growth” of these
companies with the “acquisition growth.” The former is likely to continue, while the
latter is dependent on acquisitions of other companies.
c. The disclosure information provides revenues for 2016 and 2017 as if Microsoft and
LinkedIn had been one organization over this period. That is, the “acquisition
growth” can be set aside to focus on the “organic growth.” In this case, the revised
growth rates would be the following:
The annual growth rates in revenues are (110,360/98,291)-1 = 12.3% for 2018 and
(98,291/94,490)-1 = 4.0% for 2017. The cumulative average growth rate (CAGR) is
((110,360/94,490)^0.5) - 1 = 8.1%. So “acquisition growth” added about 2% to the
growth pattern in reported revenue.
a. Year 1
11/1 Investment in Joos, Inc. (+A) ............................................... 511,500
Cash (-A) ............................................................................. 511,500
Year 2
4/30 Cash (+A) ............................................................................ 22,500
Interest receivable (-A) ........................................................ 7,500
Interest revenue (+R, +SE) ................................................. 15,000
Baylor Company now owns 75% of Reed. The company reports will be consolidated. The
total in the consolidated stockholders’ equity section on 1/1 is determined as follows:
a. The fixed-maturity (debt) investment portfolio is reported in the balance sheet at its
current fair value of $44,631 million. The cost of the portfolio is $38,953 million, there
are $5,795 million in unrealized gains, $77 million of unrealized losses, and $40 in the
allowance for credit losses.
a.
1 Investment in Palepu Co. (+A) ..................................................
240,000
.
Cash (-A) ................................................................................... 240,000
b.
+ Cash (A) - + Investment in Palepu (A) -
2. 24,000 240,000 1. 1. 240,000 24,000 2.
4. 280000 3. 60,000 276,000 4.
a.
Balance Sheet Income Statement
Cash Noncash Liabil- Contrib. Earned Net
Transaction Asset + Assets = ities + Capital + Capital Revenues - Expenses = Income
2. No entry. = - =
b.
Balance Sheet Income Statement
Cash Noncash Liabil- Contrib. Earned Net
Transaction Asset + Assets = ities + Capital + Capital Revenues - Expenses = Income
4. No entry. = - =
2. No entry
ii.
+ Cash (A) - + Investment in Leftwich (A) -
3. 5,500 75,000 1. 1. 75,000
4. 20,000
4. No entry
ii.
+ Cash (A) - + Investment in Leftwich (A) -
3. 5,500 75,000 1. 1. 75,000 5,500 3.
2. 12,000
a. The amounts reported for all these separately-identifiable assets and liabilities must
be fair values at the date of the acquisition. So, any property, plant and equipment
would be reported at what we would expect to get for it, rather than historical cost.
Any financial liabilities would be estimated at the value required to discharge them at
the date of the acquisition. In the fair value hierarchy, most of these amounts will be
determined using Level 2 or Level 3 approaches.
b. Goodwill is equal to the amount of consideration given for the transaction minus the
fair value of the net assets acquired. Other than goodwill, the asset fair value is
$8,432 million and the fair value of liabilities is $3,970 million. So, the fair value of
separately-identifiable net assets is $4,462 million (= $8,432 million - $3,970 million).
As a result, the goodwill is $9,501 million (= $13,963 million - $4,462 million). This
amount would not be amortized in the future, but Amazon would have to assess its
value annually for impairment. If the goodwill value is impaired, the goodwill asset is
reduced and a charge is recognized in income.
a. The amounts reported for all these separately-identifiable assets and liabilities must
be fair values at the date of the acquisition. So, any inventory would be reported at
what we would expect to get for it, rather than historical cost. Any financial liabilities
would be estimated at the value required to discharge them at the date of the
acquisition. In the fair value hierarchy, most of these amounts will be determined
using Level 2 or Level 3 approaches. Indeed, Gilead states that the Liability Related
to Future Royalties in this instance is computed using the real options method and
that the inputs used for valuation are unobservable and considered Level 3 under
the fair value measurement and disclosure guidance.
b. Goodwill is equal to the amount of consideration given for the transaction minus the
fair value of the net assets acquired. In this case, the acquisition price is $20.6
billion and the identifiable assets are $16.6 billion so the Goodwill is $4 billion. Under
current GAAP, this amount would not be amortized in the future, but Gilead would
have to assess its value annually for impairment. If the goodwill value is impaired,
the goodwill asset is reduced and a charge is recognized in income.
a. Year 1:
11/15 Investment in Core, Inc. (+A) ................................................ 121,35
0
Cash (-A) .............................................................................. 121,350
Year
2:
1/20 Cash (+A) .............................................................................
129,60
0
Loss on sale of investment (+E, -SE) ...................................1,650
Investment in Core, Inc. (-A) ................................................. 131,250
b. Assuming the firm’s fiscal year ends 12/31, the unrealized gain of 9,900 increases
net income and retained earnings in Year 1.
a.
Balance Sheet Income Statement
Cash Noncash Liabil- Contrib. Earned Net
Transaction Asset + Assets = ities + Capital + Capital Revenues - Expenses = Income
11/15
Purchase
-121,350 +121,350
7,500 shares = - =
Cash Investment
of Core Inc
common.
12/31
+9,900 +9,900
Increase in = - =
Investment AOCI
Investment.
b. Some companies complained that marking equity investments to fair value and
reporting fair value changes in the income statement did not fit their business model.
They wanted to make smaller investments in companies with whom they had a
strategic relationship or a continuing interest, but falling short of the significant
influence needed for the equity method. These companies said that they were not
interested in the possible holding gains that they might achieve. So, the IASB
allowed IFRS companies to make an irrevocable choice at the time of investment. If
they chose FVOCI, all holding gains and losses will end up in AOCI and never go
through the income statement.
a. Year 1:
Year 2:
1/20 Cash (+A) .............................................................................
129,60
0
AOCI (-SE) ……………………………………….. 1,650
Investment in Core, Inc. (-A) ................................................. 131,250
b.
a. The trading stock investments will be reported at $337,950. This amount is computed
using their market values at year-end; specifically, $97,950 + $240,000, or $337,950.
c. The equity method stock investments will be reported at $354,000. This amount is
computed using their equity method value at year-end; specifically, $150,000 +
$204,000, or $354,000.
e. Unrealized holding losses of $10,950 will appear in the stockholders' equity section of
the December 31 balance sheet under other comprehensive income. These losses
relate to the available-for-sale debt securities; specifically— 30-Year Treasury Bond:
$295,500 - $288,000 = $7,500; 10-Year Treasury Note: $235,500 - $232,050 = $3,450;
total of $7,500 + $3,450 = $10,950.
(Entries in $ millions)
a. Record share of income:
c. The ending balance should be $3,695 million + $95 million - $133 million = $3,657
million. The actual balance, $1,780 million, was $1,877 million lower. The
difference could be due to dispositions (offset by additional investments), foreign
currency changes, impairments, or other adjustments besides the ones described
above.
1. & 2.
Consolidating
Healy Miller Adjustments Consolidated
Current assets $1,360,000 $96,000 $ 1,456,000
Investment in Miller 400,000 $(400,000) 0
Plant assets............................... 2,400,000 328,000 12,000 2,740,000
Goodwill..................................... _________ ________ 36,000 36,000
Total assets................................ $4,160,000 $424,000 $ 4,232,000
3.
Balance Sheet Income Statement
Cash Noncash Liabil- Contrib. Earned Net
Transaction Asset + Assets = ities + Capital + Capital Revenues - Expenses = Income
1/1 -400,000 = -320,000 - =
To consolidate Investment Miller
Healy & Miller. in Miller Contributed
+36,000 Capital
Goodwill -32,000
+12,000 Miller
Plant Retained
Assets Earnings
b.
+ Investment in Miller Co. (A) - + Goodwill (A) -
400,000 1/1 1/1 36,000
1. & 2.
Rayburn Company purchased all of Kanodia Company's common stock for cash on
January 1, after which the separate balance sheets of the two corporations appeared
as follows:
Consolidating
Rayburn Kanodia Adjustments Consolidated
Investment in Kanodia................ $ 480,000 (480,000) $ 0
Other assets............................... 1,840,000 $560,000 16,000 2,416,000
Goodwill..................................... . . 32,000 32,000
Total assets................................ $2,320,000 $560,000 $2,448,000
Liabilities.................................... $ 720,000 $128,000 $848,000
Contributed capital..................... 1,120,000 240,000 (240,000) 1,120,000
Retained earnings...................... 480,000 192,000 (192,000) 480,000
Total liabilities & stockholders’
equity...................................... $2,320,000 $560,000 $2,448,000
b.
+ Investment in Kanodia Inc. (A) - + Goodwill (A) -
480,000 1/1 1/1 32,000
a. The investment is initially recorded on Engel’s balance sheet at the purchase price of
$23.5 million, including $9.2 million of goodwill. Because the fair value of Ball is less
than the carrying amount of the investment on Engel’s balance sheet, the goodwill is
deemed to be impaired. To determine impairment, the imputed value of the goodwill is
determined to be 17.5 million - $14.3 million = $3.2 million.
b. Goodwill must be written down by $6.0 ($23.5 - $17.5) million. The write-down will
reduce the carrying amount of goodwill by this amount, and the write-down will be
recorded as a loss in Engel’s consolidated income statement, thereby reducing
retained earnings by that amount.
a.
Cash paid........................................................................... $252,000
Fair market value of shares issued.................................... 216,000
Purchase price.................................................................. 468,000
Less: Book value of Harris................................................. 336,000
Excess payment................................................................. $132,000
b.
Consolidation Consolidated
Accounts Easton Company Harris Co. Entries Totals
Cash $100,800 $48,000 148,800
Receivables 192,000 108,000 300,000
Inventory 264,000 156,000 420,000
Investment in Harris 468,000 [S] $(336,000) -
[A] (132,000)
Land 120,000 72,000 192,000
Buildings, net 480,000 132,000 [A] 48,000 660,000
Equipment, net 144,000 60,000 204,000
Patent 0 --- [A] 36,000 36,000
Goodwill - -- [A] 48,000 48,000
Totals $1,768,800 $576,000 $2,008,800
c. The tangible assets are accounted for just like any other acquired asset. The
receivables are removed when collected, inventories affect future cost of goods sold,
and depreciable assets are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Intangible
assets with a determinable life are amortized (depreciated) over that useful life. Finally,
intangible assets with an indeterminate useful life (such as goodwill) are not amortized,
but are either tested annually for impairment, or more often if circumstances require.
(However, note, FASB is re-considering the post-acquisition treatment of goodwill and
may move to an amortization with impairment method in the future.)
a. Companies use derivative securities in order to mitigate risks, such as commodity price
risks, risks relating to foreign exchange fluctuations, or risks relating to fluctuations in
interest rates.
b. Derivatives are reported on the balance sheet as are the assets or liabilities to which
they relate. Generally, derivatives and the related assets/liabilities are reported on the
balance sheet at their fair market value.
c. The unrealized gains (losses) on HPE’s derivatives are reported in the Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income section of its stockholders’ equity. This reporting
indicates that the underlying item being hedged has not yet affected HPE’s profits.
Once the underlying item appears in income, these unrealized gains (losses) will be
removed from AOCI and transferred into current income.
c. Realized gains (losses) are gains (losses) that occur as a result of sales of
securities. These are reported in the income statement and affect reported income.
Unrealized gains (losses) reflect the difference between the current market price of
the security and its acquisition cost. Only unrealized gains (losses) from trading
securities are reported in income. If MetLife had sold all of the AFS securities on
which it had gains, its pre-tax income would have increased by $45,519 million.
Consolidating
Gem Alpine Adjustments Consolidated
Current assets............................ $322,500 $200,000 $ 522,500
Investment in Alpine................... 490,000 - $(490,000) -
Plant assets (net) ...................... 331,250 575,000 906,250
Total assets................................ $1,143,750 $775,000 $ 1,428,750
a. The trading security investments will be reported at $562,950. This value is computed
using their market values at year-end; specifically, $157,950 + $405,000.
d. Unrealized holding gains of $15,600 will appear in the income statement. These gains
relate to the trading securities; specifically— Ling: $157,950 - $153,600 = $4,350 gain;
Wren: $405,000 - $393,750 = $11,250; total of $4,350 + $11,250 = $15,600. The
calculation is only possible because this is the first year the bonds have been held.
Therefore, the entire price difference occurred this year.
e. Unrealized holding gains of $12,000 will appear in the stockholders' equity section
of the December 31 balance sheet under accumulated other comprehensive
income (AOCI). These losses relate to the available-for-sale securities; specifically
— Olanamic: $298,500 - $295,500 = $3,000; Fossil: $240,000 - $231,000 = $9,000;
total of $3,000 + $9,000 = $12,000.
a. Yes, each individual company (e.g., parent and subsidiary) maintains its own
financial statements (and their own underlying books and records). This approach is
necessary to identify and maintain a record of the activities of the individual units
and to report to the respective stakeholders of each unit (division heads, minority
owners, etc).
This amount is the same balance as reported for stockholders’ equity of the
Financial Services subsidiary.
This relation will always exist when the investment is organic, meaning that the
parent created and funded the subsidiary.
c. The consolidated balance sheet more clearly reflects the actual assets and liabilities
of the combined company relative to the information revealed by the equity method
of accounting. That is, it better reflects operations as one entity as far as investors
and creditors are concerned.
The equity method of accounting that is used by the parent company to account for
its investment in a subsidiary reflects only its proportionate share of the investee
company stockholders’ equity and does not report the individual assets and liabilities
comprising that equity.
(i) They eliminate the equity method investment on the parent’s balance sheet and
replace it with the actual assets and liabilities of the investee company to which it
relates.
(ii) They record any additional assets that are included in the investment balance
that may not be reflected on the subsidiary’s balance sheet, like goodwill, for
example.
f. Consolidated net income will equal the net income of the parent company. The
reason for this result is that the parent reflects the income of the subsidiary via the
equity method of accounting for its investment. The consolidation process merely
replaces the equity income account with the actual and individual sales and
expenses to which it relates. Net income is unaffected.
a. Return on assets:
$57,411 + (1 – 0.25)*$2,873
ROA = = 0.180 or 18.0%
($323,888 + $338,516)/2
RNOA above 174% is a very high number. One factor contributing to this return is
Apple’s well-known use of contract manufacturers. Apple concentrates on the product
design, but they let other companies do much of the manufacturing. This means there
are relatively fewer assets on the balance sheet. Another factor is that Apple develops
much of its intellectual property in-house, which means that it doesn’t show up on the
balance sheet. Apple reports no goodwill asset in its balance sheet and no intangible
assets., This reduces the company’s reported assets. Finally, Apple has issued a
non-trivial amount of debt (borrowed money) over time. All of these factors yield a
relatively low net asset amount in the denominator of the RNOA ratio. The small
denominator results in a higher ratio, that is a higher RNOA. In other words, Apple
earns a high return per dollar of net operating asset employed.
d. Return on financial assets: The return on financial assets is measured as the income
from interest and dividends divided by the average balance of financial assets (which
Apple refers to as marketable securities).
(1 – 0.25) x $3,763
Return on Financial Assets = = 0.0182 or 1.82%
($153,814 + $157,054)/2
Apple’s return on its financial assets is much lower than its return on its operating
assets. This differential is reasonable because interest rates are low and also Apple
earns very high returns on its products. However, the interest and dividend income in
the income statement do not tell the whole story because these are available-for-sale
assets and thus the unrealized holding gains and losses are not in the income
statement but in AOCI. Apple’s disclosures show that they have net unrealized gains
of $3,320 million as well (but again, these are unrealized).
a.
Balance Sheet Income Statement
Cash Noncash Liabil- Contrib. Earned Net
Transaction Asset + Assets = ities + Capital + Capital Revenues - Expenses = Income
b.
Balance Sheet Income Statement
Cash Noncash Liabil- Contrib. Earned Net
Transaction Asset + Assets = ities + Capital + Capital Revenues - Expenses = Income
1/2/22 -588,000 +588,000 = - =
Buy 20,000 Cash Investment
shares of
Dye.
12/31/22 +22,400 = - =
Declare Dividend
dividend Receivable
$.8/share.
-22,400
Investment
a.
i. Year 1:
1/2 Investment in Dye, Inc. (+A) ..............................................................
588,000
Cash (-A) ...........................................................................................
588,000
Year
2:
1/18 Cash (+A) ..........................................................................................
22,400
Dividend receivable (-A) .................................................................... 22,400
ii.
+ Cash (A) - + Investment in Dye Inc. (A) -
1/18/23 22,400 588,000 1/2/22 1/2/22 588,000 84,000 12/31/22
2023:
1/18 Cash (+A) ..........................................................................................
22,400
Dividend receivable (-A) ....................................................................22,400
ii.
+ Cash (A) - + Investment in Dye Inc. (A) -
1/18/23 22,400 588,000 1/2/22 1/2/22 588,000
12/31/22 156,800 22,400 12/31/22
a. Consolidated statements present the total assets and liabilities of all firms in which
the reporting firm has more than a fifty percent ownership with intercompany
accounts and transactions eliminated.
b. Demski, Inc. has a controlling interest in Asare and Demski Finance. Therefore, all
of Asare’s and Demski Finance’s assets and liabilities are added to those of Demski
Inc. for the presentation of the consolidated balance sheet. Demski, Inc. does not
have a controlling interest in Knechel. Therefore, it must show its investment in
Knechel Inc. as a financial asset (and use the equity method of accounting for that
investment).
c. This excess is the amount paid to Asare in excess of the net book value of Asare’s
assets (assets less liabilities assumed) when Asare was acquired by Demski. The
amount is known more commonly as Goodwill and reflects the fact that Demski
believed the company was worth more than the net book value of its assets.
d. The amount represents the outside ownership claim on Asare’s net assets, which
are aggregated in the balances of Demski’s accounts. In other words, Demski only
owns 75% of Asare; other investors own the remaining 25%. The non-controlling
interest represents the equity of the 25% owners. (Recall 100% of the assets and
liabilities of Asare are on Demski’s balance sheet.)
Such practice may get by the firm’s auditors once or twice, but failure to be
consistent in the accounting treatment over time is unlikely to be tolerated under
SOX and the increased scrutiny applied by the SEC.
Further, such practice can lead to lawsuits by investors who can argue that
management was not accounting truthfully.