W5 Elmira Pragmatics
W5 Elmira Pragmatics
W5 Elmira Pragmatics
Week 5_Assignment
SPEECH ACT: Making requests
Number of students: 10
use some new words, phrases and expressions that can be used in making formal and
informal requests
notice and identify the usage of requests depending on the level of formality, social
make appropriate requests depending on the level of formality, social status and social
distance
Assessment: formative type of assessment with the provision of oral feedback by the teacher,
Procedure:
1. Warm-up
Objectives:
Duration: 5 minutes
U2 Mirzaeva Sanam
Week 5_Assignment
Teacher instructions:
1) In the presentation form or on the boards illustrate different pictures where different
3) Distribute your students cards (Handout 2) and ask them to match those requests with
4) Ask them to identify whether these requests are formal or informal, direct or indirect.
Student directions:
2) Tell your guesses about what kind of situations may be presented in them.
3) Look at the cards distributed by your teacher, and match the requests with the illustrated
pictures.
Activity 1:
Objectives:
To enable students to analyze and identify the differences in making responses in L1 and
English
Duration: 10 minutes
Teacher instructions:
2) In the presentation form or on the board, illustrate one situation on making requests
(Handout 3)
3) Ask your students to read it carefully and tell how would they respond to it in their first
language (L1)
4) Then, ask how would they respond to it, if it was in English language.
5) Distribute the handouts including the table (Handout 4), where the students should write
Student directions:
1) Work in pairs.
2) Look at the request situation illustrated on the board and read it carefully. Tell how
3) And tell how would you respond to the same request if it was in English.
4) Look at the handout distributes to you by the teacher. With your partner identify the
differences between the responses made in your L1 Karakalpak and in English. Write
5) Read out your answers and give some words or expressions that can be used in making
Handout 3
Handout 4
L1 (Karakalpak) English
given above
Activity 2
Objectives:
To teach some new structures and expressions related to making formal and informal
and directness
Duration: 20 minutes
Teacher instructions:
2) Ask your students to watch it carefully and note the words that were used to make formal
3) Teach your students some more words and expressions, as well as grammar structures
Student directions:
4) Identify and note the words and expressions that were used to make formal and informal
5) Look at some other words and expressions that can be used in making formal and
Handout 5
U2 Mirzaeva Sanam
Week 5_Assignment
Activity 1
Teacher instructions:
2) Ask them to identify whether the situation is formal or informal, polite or less polite and
direct or indirect.
3) Distribute the checklist that helps students to write down specific notes about each
dialogue (Handout 7)
4) Tell your students to note down these specific features of the dialogue into the checklist
paper
5) Tell your students to exchange their dialogues with other groups one by one. And in each
round tell them to identify specific things about each dialogue and find the differences
between them in terms of type and level of formality, directness and politeness
6) After each group finished looking through the dialogues and filling their checklists, tell
them to elicit their answers written in the checklists and give your oral feedback
Student directions:
2) Identify whether the situation is formal or informal, polite or less polite and direct or
indirect.
3) Note down the specific features into the checklist paper (Handout 7) which was
4) After having doing with your dialogue, exchange it with other groups one by one. In each
round identify specific things about each dialogue and find the differences between them
5) Add specific comments on other dialogues as well into your Checklist Paper (Handout 7)
6) After having finished looking through the dialogues, share your answers that you wrote
on your checklist with the teacher and other groups. Listen to the feedback of your
Handout 6:
U2 Mirzaeva Sanam
Week 5_Assignment
Dialogues:
At school
Distance: Classmates or friends relationship, interact with each other a lot at school and after
school.
Interaction:
T: Well.
B: around 55$
B: Can you lend me some please? Cause tomorrow is mom's birthday. I wanna buy something
special for her. I gained 45$ in two months but that's not enough I think.
B: Oh really?
T: Sure!
T: Bye!
At University
Interactions:
S: I came here to consult with you about my final project. Professor, would you mind giving me
P: Sure, but I'm afraid I will not be able to send feedback today.
S: I was wondering if it would be possible for you to send me the feedback tomorrow?
Handout 7
U2 Mirzaeva Sanam
Week 5_Assignment
Student Checklist Paper
Dialogue 1
Indirect Direct
Dialogue 2
Indirect Direct
Handout 8
Situational cards
Handout 10
Handout 12
Rubric for assessment [adapted from: Ishihara & Cohen, 2010, pp.316-317]
Evaluation
Grammatical structures
Homework
Teacher instructions:
1) Ask your students to say several things that they learned from the lesson
3) Randomly choose pairs and assign pictures illustrated in Handout 1 to each pair
4) Ask your students to create a role-play dialogue to act out the situation depicted in the
picture.
Student directions:
1) Tell your teacher several things that you have learned during the lesson (1-2 things)
2) Work with the pair assigned to you by the teacher that is randomly selected in Random
3) With your partner create a role-play dialogue including complaint and a response to the
As Ishihara and Cohen (2010) mention in their book, assessment of students’ pragmatic
ability whether it is formal or informal is an integral part of teaching pragmatics (Ishihara &
Cohen, 2010, p.286). Therefore, creating an appropriate assessment rubric is the matter of
importance.
included in order to enable students make a self-assessment on the provided situational context
and scaffold their ideas and thoughts about how to make a formal assessment while analyzing a
speech act according to the certain criteria. As Ishihara and Cohen (2010) state, self-assessment
might be “undertaken in collaboration with teachers” (p.307), therefore the teacher first of all
provides a chance for the students to make a sample evaluation and then himself provides a
U2 Mirzaeva Sanam
Week 5_Assignment
feedback and his way of assessment. This way of assessment includes analysis and practice the
data that was discussed previously and enables students to observe ready samples and give their
points. In this checklist, students have to look through the responses and analyze the levels of
formality, directness and politeness, as well as identify the words and grammar patterns that are
Second rubric (Handout 10) also includes Peer Check assessment, but this time with
more extended criteria taking into the consideration guidelines provided by Ishihara and Cohen
(2010). As they state in their book (2010), self-assessment is one of the best ways of creating a
chance for students to take responsibilities to assess others and themselves, since it requires to
carefully analyze responses, as well as strictly following the rubrics in order to keep the fairness
of assessment. Based on the sample analysis and scaffolded version of assessing checklist,
students will be somehow ready not only to tick and select the options in rubrics, but also
identify the weak and strong points of each others’ responses and provide their own suggestions
Third rubric is specially designed for teacher’s assessment and feedback, since it
provides the range of requirements and takes into the consideration several aspects of evaluation
ability), cultural aspects (socio-pragmatic ability), and analytic aspects (meta-pragmatic ability).
In the provided rubric there are included several points, which all focus on assessing
not only the social and cultural abilities of students: whether they know and differentiate the
levels of formality, directness, politeness or social status and distance; but also check the
linguistic abilities including vocabulary range and grammatical abilities, since the assignment
focuses on writing skill and requires students to produce their own output. Students’ competence
on how well they responded to the task, whether they followed a structure that was taught
previously, what discourse markers and connectives they used in their responses, will also be
taken into the notice during the assessment. Moreover, there is a focus on analytic aspects in this
U2 Mirzaeva Sanam
Week 5_Assignment
rubric, since the teacher is required to analyze and provide his/her feedback on how well the
student responded to the task, taking into an account the linguistic and social patterns.
Afore-mentioned and illustrated rubrics and checklists will fulfill the teaching
process and give a chance not only to the teacher to assess and comment on their students’
output, but also enable students themselves to look through the rubrics and analyze the sample
answers, as well as each other’s works and give their feedback. By this way, students will learn
how to assess without biases and enhance their meta-pragmatic abilities as well.
References:
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A.D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where
language and culture meet. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman. ISBN: 978-1408204573
worksheets/making-requests
https://slideplayer.com/amp/8676624/