The IMO Polar Code of Navigation (SANTOS PEDRO)
The IMO Polar Code of Navigation (SANTOS PEDRO)
The IMO Polar Code of Navigation (SANTOS PEDRO)
Overview
Existing Measures in Arctic waters A tale of two vessels Polar Code development
Rationale, background and progress to date
Russian Federation
Northern Sea Route Regime
Denmark/Greenland
Navigation: Rules & Reporting Baltic Rules
MS Explorer
B th hit i Both ice. Both sank. p p p p y Both prompted important developments in maritime safety:
Titanic SOLAS Explorer Mandatory Polar Code
H Harmonized, common rules will i d l ill provide greater protection world-wide and simplify life for designers, builders, builders operators and regulators. regulators
Multi-year ice
IMO Outside Working Group formed after Helsinki meeting Requirements proposed to IMO for vessel operation in Polar waters Guidelines for ships operating in Arctic ice-covered waters published Include provisions for construction equipment operations and construction, equipment, environmental protection and damage control Construction aspects refer to draft IACS Unified Requirements for Polar Class Ships
1998 2002
2006 2007
Expansion
IACS Council adopts Unified Requirements World-wide distribution of images of MS Explorer accident and sinking Guidelines updated and expanded to cover all Polar waters (A.1024 (26)) Development of mandatory Polar Code added to IMO work plan
2009
2010
Proposals for ice navigator competencies considered Discussion on mandatory requirements began
Progress to Date
Principles guiding Code development:
Risk-based approach in determining scope Holistic approach to mitigate risks to acceptable levels
Development and use of an extensive Hazards and Risks list for validating risk mitigation measures p y Hazards and risks provisionally consolidated into four main categories:
1. 2. 3. 3 4. Environmental conditions High latitude Environmental sensitivity E i t l iti it Human element (e.g. ice, temperatures) (e.g. remoteness, communications issues) (e.g. slow recovery f ( l from d damage) ) (e.g. specialized training and experience requirements, physiological effects of polar conditions)
Construction requirements established by reference to IACS Unified Requirements for Polar Class Ships All vessels to require a Polar Ship Certificate to operate in Polar waters t Polar Operation Manual (Permit or Ice Certificate) to contain vessel specific guidance for crew Additional components, e.g. reporting, monitoring, as well as application of specific provisions still to be determined
Polar Waters
Arctic waters
Antarctic waters
Joint effort from class, academia, industry and researchers Hull design requirements are state-of-the-art scenario and mechanics based: Design based on plastic structural behaviour Steel distributed differently Machinery requirements have similar approach to new Baltic Rules No power requirements p q
Keys to success
Agreement upon provisions th t mitigate the risks that a vessel is A t i i that iti t th i k th t li likely to encounter, including:
Harmonization of ship structure and other characteristics through adoption of P l Cl d ti f Polar Classes Requirements for knowledgeable and experienced crew Monitoring and enforcement
Ability to provide current and accurate ice and weather information Continued development of IACS Unified Requirements based on experience Understanding by operators that remoteness and limitations in infrastructure mean voyages in polar waters require additional planning and preparation
Concluding remarks
Current measures do not adequately protect polar waters from shipping activities. pp g Coastal states have introduced own rules as a result. There is a need and work is underway to develop measures that are robust, harmonized, and risk-based. Cooperation and a concerted effort will be required to achieve the desired goal. If not adequate, the rules introduced by various Coastal states will continue.
Questions please! p
RDIMS 6873915