Scribd
Upload
50 views2 pages

Teamwork Assesment Form

This document is a teamwork assessment form used to evaluate the performance of group members on a project. It contains sections for listing group members and assessing each member's effort, reliability, contribution to discussions, respect for others' opinions, team spirit, and whether the evaluator would want to work with the person again. Members are rated on a scale from "Novice" to "Exemplary" for each criteria. The evaluation is intended to provide feedback to help assess contributions fairly without members seeing each other's responses.

Uploaded by

Ahmad Mujahidin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
50 views2 pages

Teamwork Assesment Form

This document is a teamwork assessment form used to evaluate the performance of group members on a project. It contains sections for listing group members and assessing each member's effort, reliability, contribution to discussions, respect for others' opinions, team spirit, and whether the evaluator would want to work with the person again. Members are rated on a scale from "Novice" to "Exemplary" for each criteria. The evaluation is intended to provide feedback to help assess contributions fairly without members seeing each other's responses.

Uploaded by

Ahmad Mujahidin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

FM-BINUS-AA-FPT-322/R0

Teamwork Assesment Form

Class: _______________________________

Group Name/Number: ___________________

1. Names your group members. (The letters corresponds to the student's name, do not forget to
include yourself )
A
B
C
D
E
F
G

2. Teamwork Performance (Tick one criteria for each person)


a. Effort to do the assignment
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not do anything, did not care about the assignment.

Developing: did average amount of work or did all the work.


PI 3
Competent: did fair share of work, no more or less than others.

Exemplary: did fair share of work, sometimes help others with their
work.

b. Reliable for meetings


Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: never attended meetings, never prepared.

Developing: skipped some meetings, arrived late, almost never


PI 2 prepared.
Competent: attended most meetings, almost always on time and
prepared.
Exemplary: always attended meetings, on time and fully prepared.

c. Contribution to discussions and decisions


Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: made no contribution.

Developing: made some contributions with minimum quality.


PI 1
Competent: made most contributions with average quality.

Exemplary: fully contributed with high quality.

d. Respects each group member's opinions


Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: never talk nor argue, did not care about others opinions.

Developing: continuously talking, rarely care about others opinions,


PI 1 argued inappropriately.
FM-BINUS-AA-FPT-322/R0
Developing: continuously talking, rarely care about others opinions,
PI 1 argued inappropriately.
Competent: most of the time listens and speaks appropriately, rarely
argued inappropriately.
Exemplary: knows when to listen and talk, argued appropriately.

e. Team spirit
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not give input nor cooperate with others.

Developing: did not really care about team effort, or overbearing and
PI 2 incosiderate of team members.
Competent: Usually respectful to the team members, cooperative, and
considerate.
Exemplary: exceptionally respectful, helpful, and considerate to the
team members.

f. Overall evaluation
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not want to work with this person again.

Developing: may would not mind to work with this person again.

Competent: Probably would work with this person again.

Exemplary: Definitely want to work with this person again.

Analyze ideas to discern feasible solutions by building consensus with people from different
PI 1 background or having different perspectives.
Share team's responsibilities and duties and take on different roles when applicable.
PI 2
Develop and execute a strategy for action to achieve team's goal (i.e. group climate that
PI 3 encourages success, communication strategies for dealing with conflict).

Do not base your evaluation on friendship or personal conflicts. Your input can be a valuable indicator to help assess
contributions in a fair manner. THIS EVALUATION WILL NOT BE SEEN BY YOUR GROUP MEMBERS
Source: Designing Better Engineering Education through Assessment by Spurlin / Rajala / Lavella, 2008 with modification

You might also like