Ethics Thinkers Digest - Booklet
Ethics Thinkers Digest - Booklet
EDEN IAS
ETHICS
70 Thinkers - 70 Thoughts
A BRIEF SUMMARY ON MORAL LEADERS,
THINKERS AND PHILOSOPHER FROM
WORLD & INDIA
Edited by
Tirthankar Roychowdhary
Message For The Aspirants...
Dear Aspirants,
It is common knowledge and an open secret that GS Paper-IV (Ethics, integrity and aptitude) is
perhaps the most intriguing and rewarding aspect of the Civil Services (Main) Examination. It is
the performance in GS Paper-IV that separates the “Best from the Rest”. Nearly all aspirants un-
derstand the significance of GS Paper-IV yet a select few are able to translate their appreciation
of the subject into performance during the Examination.
This inability stems largely from the ethical hollowness that often surrounds the arguments
that are presented by the aspirants in the answers and case studies of GS Paper-IV. Among other
reasons, it is the absence of moral philosophical interpolations and thoughts that add fuel to
such ethical hollowness. Unless the arguments are backed by moral philosophies they appear
very generic. Further there are several questions that create moral and ethical dilemma, and in
such questions, no arguments can be presented without sacrificing some moral or ethical space.
During such situations moral philosophies not only come to rescue but also add more credence
to the adopted line of thought. Hence the preparation of GS Paper-IV is incomplete without an
appreciation of different moral stances taken by thinkers and philosophers from all over the
world and India.
To help the aspirants in such endeavour, this digest has been created. It is a brief summary of all
important moral thinkers, their thoughts and philosophies. A diligent and industrious reading of
this digest will definitely improve the content of the answers in GS Paper-IV.
Regards
Tirthankar Roychowdhary
(Director, EDEN IAS)
Thinkers Digest -”70 Thinkers 70 Thoughts”
LIST OF MORAL LEADERS, THINKERS AND PHILOSOPHERS
Perhaps Socrates’ most important and endur- At its simplest, the Socratic Method is used to solve
ing single contribution to Western thought is his di- a problem by breaking the problem down into
alectical method of inquiry, which he referred to a series of questions, the answers to which grad-
as “elenchus”(roughly, “cross-examination”) but ually distill better and better solutions. Both the
which has become known as the Socratic Method
questioner and the questioned explore the impli-
or Socratic Debate (although some commentators
have argued that Protagoras actually invented the cations of the other›s positions, in order to stimu-
“Socratic” method). late rational thinking and illuminate ideas. Thus,
Socrates would counter any assertion with a coun-
The Socratic Method, also known as method of elen- terexample which disproves the assertion (or at
chus, elenctic method, or Socratic debate, is a form
least shows it to be inadequate). This would lead to
of cooperative argumentative dialogue between
individuals, based on asking and answering ques- a modified assertion, which Socrates would then
tions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out test again with another counterexample. Through
ideas and underlying presuppositions. It is a dialec- several iterations of this kind, the original asser-
tical method, involving a discussion in which the tion is continually adjusted and becomes more and
defense of one point of view is questioned; one par- more difficult to refute, which Socrates held meant
ticipant may lead another to contradict themselves that it was closer and closer to the truth.
in some way, thus weakening the defender’s point.
Virtue is the mid-point between two vices (extremes). Virtue, arete, or excellence is defined as a
mean between two extremes of excess and defect in regard to a feeling or action as the practically wise
person would determine it.
The mean is relative to the individual and circumstances. For example, consider the following traits
The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the dead
Courage is the first of human qualities because it is the quality which guarantees the others.
I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies; for the
hardest victory is over self.
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.
One swallow does not make a summer, neither does one fine day; similarly one day or brief
time of happiness does not make a person entirely happy.
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light.
You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the greatest quality of the mind
next to honor.
Anybody can become angry - that is easy, but to be angry with the right person and to the right
degree and at the right time and for the right purpose, and in the right way - that is not within
everybody’s power and is not easy.
In 1776, Jeremy Bentham first announced him- Jeremy Bentham saw human behaviour as he-
self to the world as a proponent of utility and donistic. Jeremy Bentham view is known as act
declared utility as the guiding principle of con- utilitarianism. Bentham claimed that all human
duct and law. The underlying principle of utilitari- beings seek pleasure and try to avoid pain. Ben-
anism is that an action is right if it produces great-
tham believes that all pleasures are alike. Plea-
est good for the greatest number. sures do not have qualitative differences. Pleasures
have only quantitative differences i.e. they are more
Utilitarianism is the universalistic form of Ethi- or they are less. Hence Benthamite utilitarianism
cal Hedonism {where Hedonism argues that plea- is often called as quantitative utilitarianism.
sure is the highest good and the supreme ideal of
life) Utilitarianism maintains that the supreme
ideal of life is pleasure - not the individual plea-
sure but universal or general happiness. Utili-
tarianism is a normative-consequentialist eth-
ical theory that places the locus of right and
wrong solely on the outcomes (consequences)
of choosing one action/policy over other ac-
tions/policies.
Bentham devised the Hedonic Calculus to calculate pleasure and pain. Based on this calculus one
can weigh-out the pleasure and pain of flowing from an action in a given situation by focusing on
seven things.
• Its intensity: How strong it is?
• Its duration: How long it is?
• Its certainty: How likely it could be?
• Its propinquity: When it could arrive?
• Its fecundity: If it could cause further pleasure?
• Its purity: How free from pain it is?
• Its extent: How many people are affected?
By looking at all of this we can find the right action that we should choose under any given circum-
stance. The idea is to promote the most pleasure to the most people.
As to the evil which results from a censorship, it is impossible to measure it, for it is impossible to tell
where it ends.
The question is not, can they reason? Nor, can they talk? But, can they suffer?
The said truth is that it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of
right and wrong.
The greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation.
Stretching his hand up to reach the stars, too often man forgets the flowers at his feet.
The age we live in is a busy age; in which knowledge is rapidly advancing towards perfection.
The schoolmaster is abroad! And I trust to him armed with his primer against the soldier in full
military array.
No power of government ought to be employed in the endeavor to establish any system or arti-
cle of belief on the subject of religion.
Mill was a proponent of utilitarianism, an ethi- A person may cause evil to others not only by his
cal theory developed by his predecessor Jeremy actions but by his inaction, and in either case he
Bentham. Mill fully accepted Bentham’s devo- is justly accountable to them for the injury.
tion to greatest happiness principle as the basic We have a right, also, in various ways, to act upon
statement of utilitarian value. Mill believed that our unfavorable opinion of anyone, not to the op-
the aim of Utilitarianism is to promote happiness pression of his individuality, but in the exercise
for maximum people and in order to promote hap- of ours.
piness we must maximise pleasure and eliminate War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things.
pain for the greatest number of people but he made The decayed and degraded state of moral and pa-
distinction between quantitative and qualita- triotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth
tive pleasures. war is much worse.
John Stuart Mill’s version of utilitarianism is Bad men need nothing more to compass their
ends, than that good men should look on and do
known as Rule-Utilitarianism. According to Mill
nothing.
some kinds of pleasure experienced by human
beings also differ from others in qualitative One person with a belief is equal to a force of
ways. This establishes the moral worth of promot- ninety-nine who have only interests.
ing higher (largely intellectual) pleasures among Pleasure and freedom from pain, are the only
sentient beings even when their momentary in- things desirable as ends.
tensity may be less than that of alternative lower No great improvements in the lot of mankind
(largely bodily) pleasures. He declares that more are possible until a great change takes place in
valuable pleasures are those which employ the fundamental constitution of their modes of
“higher faculties”. thought.
Mill argued that: Everyone who receives the protection of society
owes a return for the benefit.
“It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a
The most cogent reason for restricting the inter-
pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied ference of government is the great evil of adding
than a fool satisfied” unnecessarily to its power.
Thomas Hobbes
Social contract is the idea that the people give So, individuals implicitly agree to a social con-
up some rights to a government and/or other tract with a state or authority in return for pro-
authority in order to receive, or jointly preserve, so-
tection from harm and a more functional society.
cial order. Plato in his Socratic dialogue “Crito” first
For Hobbes, however, as detailed in his “Levia-
pointed out that members within a society implicit- than” of 1657, it is important that this social contract
ly agree to the terms of a kind of social contract byinvolves an absolute government that does not
their choice to stay within the society. rule by consent (effectively Totalitarianism), since
in his view people cannot be trusted. He rejected
But it was Thomas Hobbes who took the theory the doctrine of separation of powers, arguing
forward in a more explicit way. He argued that, in that the sovereign must control civil, military, ju-
dicial and ecclesiastical powers, which some have
a primitive unstructured social order (a “state of
seen as a justification for authoritarianism and
nature”), individuals have unlimited natural free- even Totalitarianism
doms and their words or actions are bound only by
their consciences. However, this general autonomy
also includes the freedom to harm all who threaten
one›s own self-preservation (and for others to
harm in their own interests), and Hobbes was of the
opinion that humans are by their very nature nas-
ty and mean. It is therefore, he argued, in an indi-
vidual’s rational self-interest to voluntarily sub-
jugate his freedom of action in order to obtain
the benefits provided by the formation of social
structures and civil rights.
The right of nature... is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for
the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life.
During the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that con-
ditions called war; and such a war, as if of every man, against every man.
It is not wisdom but Authority that makes a law.
Leisure is the mother of philosophy.
In the state of nature profit is the measure of right.
The obligation of subjects to the sovereign is understood to last as long, and no longer, than the
power lasteth by which he is able to protect them.
Force and fraud are in war the two cardinal virtues.
He that is taken and put into prison or chains is not conquered, though overcome; for he is still
an enemy.
The privilege of absurdity; to which no living creature is subject, but man only.
John Locke was also a Contractarian and believer He is sometimes referred to as the “Philosopher
of the Social Contract Theory. John Locke devel- of Freedom”, and his political views influenced
oped the theory further, arguing that this contract is both the American and French Revolutions.
only legitimate to the extent that it meets the gen- Locke believed that human nature allowed people
eral interest. Therefore, when failings are found in to be selfish. Locke also advocated governmental
the contract, we effectively renegotiate it to change separation of powers and believed that revolu-
the terms, using methods such as elections and leg- tion is not only a right but an obligation in some
islature. Since rights come from agreeing to the circumstances. These ideas would come to have
contract and accepting responsibility for following profound influence on the Declaration of Indepen-
its rules, then those who simply choose not to fulfill dence and the Constitution of the United States.
their contractual obligations (e.g. by committing
crimes), deserve to lose their rights, and the rest
of society can be expected to protect itself against
them by the threat of punishment.
The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the
states of created beings capable of law, where there is no law, there is no freedom.
We are like chameleons; we take our hue and the color of our moral character, from those who
are around us.
Education begins the gentleman, but reading, good company and reflection must finish him.
Every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has a right to, but himself.
No man’s knowledge here can go beyond his experience.
What worries you, masters you.
Government has no other end, but the preservation of property.
The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property.
All wealth is the product of labor.
Fortitude is the guard and support of the other virtues.
John Rawls conception of a fair society gives rise to Many of our most serious conflicts are con-
his first principle justice flicts within ourselves. Those who suppose
their judgements are always consistent are
1st Principle: - “All people have equal claims to unreflective or dogmatic.
as much freedom as is consistent with everyone
else having the same level of freedom.” A just society is a society that if you knew ev-
erything about it, you’d be willing to enter it
Rawls further claims that, because their ignorance in a random place.
includes an ignorance of probabilities, deliberators
would be extremely cautious, and apply what he The fairest rules are those to which everyone
calls a ‘maximin’ principle: they will aim to ensure would agree if they did not know how much
power they would have.
that the worst possible position they could end up
in is as good as possible in terms of primary goods. The natural distribution is neither just nor
unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born
2nd Principle: - The second principle has two
into society at some particular position.
parts: These are simply natural facts. What is just
First, people in the original position will tolerate and unjust is the way that institutions deal
inequalities only if the jobs that pay more aren’t with these facts.
assigned unfairly. This gives us the ideal of fair The principles of justice are chosen behind a
equality of opportunity. veil of ignorance.
Second, since their reasoning is governed by the The bad man desires arbitrary power. What
‘maximin’ principle, deliberators will only tolerate moves the evil man is the love of injustice.
inequalities that benefit the worst off: since, as far An injustice is tolerable only when it is nec-
as they know, they might be the worst off; this max- essary to avoid an even greater injustice.
imizes the quality of their worst possible outcome.
A society regulated by a public sense of jus-
This is called the difference principle.
tice is inherently stable.
The intolerant can be viewed as free-riders,
as persons who seek the advantages of just
institutions while not doing their share to
uphold them.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in his 1762 treatise “Du the human power of reason) into “amour-propre”
contrat social” (“The Social Contract”, outlined (a kind of artificial pride which forces man to com-
a much less individualist (and much more col- pare himself to others, thus creating unwarranted
lectivist) version of contract theory, based on the fear and allowing men to take pleasure in the pain
conception of popular sovereignty (the belief that or weakness of others).
the legitimacy of the state is created by the will
or consent of its people, who are the source of all Rousseau’s version of the social contract is the
political power), and on his advocacy of direct de- one most often associated with the term «social
mocracy. contract» itself. His theories had a strong influ-
ence on both the 1789 French Revolution and the
He argued that, as an individual, the subject can subsequent formation of the Socialist movement.
be egoist and decide that his personal interest
should override the collective interest. However,
as part of a collective body, the individual sub-
ject puts aside his Egoism to create a “general
will” (the persistence of equality and freedom in
the society). Rousseau goes so far as to indicate
that people who do not obey the general will must
be “forced to be free”.
Pierre-Joseph
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon’s
Ethical Views
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was a proponent of anar- ing each other, while maintaining complete individual
chism. sovereignty, resulting in a non-aggressive, utopian
state of Anarchism.
Anarchism is a political philosophy and move-
ment that rejects all involuntary, coercive forms
of hierarchy. It radically calls for the abolition of the
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon-
state which it holds to be undesirable, unnecessary Famous Quotes
and harmful. As an anti-authoritarian, anti-statist
and libertarian form of socialism, anarchism ad-
When deeds speak, words are nothing.
vocates for the replacement of the state with state-
less societies or other forms of free associations. The great are only great because we are on our
knees. Let us rise!
The timeline of anarchism stretches back to prehisto-
ry when people lived in anarchistic societies long be- All parties without exception, when they seek
fore the establishment of formal states, kingdoms or for power, are varieties of absolutism.
empires. With the rise of organised hierarchical bod-
I build no system. I ask an end to privilege, the
ies, skepticism towards authority also rose, but it was abolition of slavery, equality of rights, and the
not until the 19th century a self-conscious political reign of law. Justice, nothing else; that is the
movement was formed. During the latest half of 19th alpha and omega of my argument: to others I
and the first decades of 20th century, the anarchist leave the business of governing the world.
movement flourished to most parts of the world and
had a significant role in worker’s struggles for eman- Communism is the exploitation of the strong
cipation. by the weak. In Communism, inequality comes
from placing mediocrity on a level with excel-
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809 - 1865) advocated lence.
a conception of social contract which did not involve
Communism is inequality, but not as proper-
an individual surrendering sovereignty to others.
ty is. Property is exploitation of the weak by
He argued that the contract was not between indi-
the strong. Communism is exploitation of the
viduals and the state, but rather between individu- strong by the weak.
als themselves refraining from coercing or govern-
Immanuel Kant
Immanuel Kant
Immanuel Kant
Happiness is not an ideal of reason, but of Experience without theory is blind, but the-
imagination. ory without experience is mere intellectual
play.
A categorical imperative would be one which
represented an action as objectively neces- Live your life as though your every act were
sary in itself, without reference to any other to become a universal law.
purpose.
Ingratitude is the essence of vileness.
He who is cruel to animals becomes hard
also in his dealings with men. We can judge All our knowledge begins with the senses,
the heart of a man by his treatment of ani- proceeds then to the understanding, and
mals. ends with reason. There is nothing higher
than reason.
Thoughts without content are empty, intu-
itions without concepts are blind. Seek not the favor of the multitude; it is sel-
dom got by honest and lawful means. But
Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is seek the testimony of few; and number not
organized life. voices, but weigh them.
Give me matter, and I will construct a world By a lie, a man, annihilates his dignity as a
out of it! man.
W.D. Ross
W. D. Ross argues that there are seven prima facie duties which need to be taken into consider-
ation when deciding which duty should be acted upon:
• Duty of beneficence (to help other people to increase their pleasure, improve their character, etc).
• Duty of reparation (to recompense someone if you have acted wrongly towards them).
• Duty of promise-keeping (to act according to explicit and implicit promises, including the implicit
promise to tell the truth).
In some circumstances, there may be clashes or conflicts between these duties and a decision must be
made whereby one duty may “trump” another, although there are no hard and fast rules and no fixed
order of significance.
• They are self-evident and obvious duties (prima facie is a Latin expression meaning ‘on first appearanc-
es’ or ‘by first instance’)
• They can be known to be correct if a person thinks about them and understands them.
•They should be promoted, “all things considered”
•They can be outweighed by other prima facie duties.
Actual duties
This is the duty people are left with after they have weighed up all the conflicting prima facie duties that
apply in a particular case.
“But to die to escape from poverty or love or anything painful is not the mark of a brave man,
but rather of a coward; for it is softness to fly from what is troublesome,”
Utilitarianism is simplistic and reductive it overlooks or conflates the complicated ways in
which human beings stand in relation, and thus in moral obligation, to one another.
The moral philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas involves a merger of at least two apparently disparate
traditions: Aristotelian Eudaimonism and Christian theology.
On the one hand, Aquinas follows Aristotle in thinking that an act is good or bad depending on
whether it contributes to or deters us from our proper human end—the telos or final goal at which
all human actions aim. That telos is eudaimonia, or happiness, where “happiness” is understood in
terms of completion, perfection, or well-being. Achieving happiness, however, requires a range of
intellectual and moral virtues that enable us to understand the nature of happiness and motivate
us to seek it in a reliable and consistent way.
On the other hand, Aquinas believes that we can never achieve complete or final happiness in this
life. For him, final happiness consists in beatitude or supernatural union with God. Such an end lies
far beyond what we through our natural human capacities can attain. For this reason, we not only
need the virtues, we also need God to transform our nature.
Thomas Aquinas is credited with introducing 2. that the good effect and not the evil effect be
the principle of double effect in his discussion intended;
of the permissibility of self-defense in the Sum-
ma Theologica. Killing one’s assailant is justified, 3. that the good effect be not produced by means
he argues, provided one does not intend to kill him. of the evil effect;
In contrast, Augustine had earlier maintained that
4. that there be a proportionately grave reason
killing in self-defense was not permissible, arguing
for permitting the evil effect”
that “private self-defense can only proceed from
some degree of inordinate self-love.” Aquinas ob- The fourth condition, the proportionality condition
serves that “Nothing hinders one act from having is usually understood to involve determining if the
two effects, only one of which is intended, while the extent of the harm is adequately offset by the mag-
other is beside the intention. nitude of the proposed benefit.
A person may licitly perform an action that he
foresees will produce a good effect and a bad
effect provided that four conditions are verified
at one and the same time:
1. that the action in itself from its very object be
good or at least indifferent;
To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is pos-
sible.
The things that we love tell us what we are.
There is nothing on this earth more to be prized than true friendship.
Beware of the person of one book.
Love takes up where knowledge leaves off.
Better to illuminate than merely to shine, to deliver to others contemplated truths than merely
to contemplate.
Wonder is the desire for knowledge.
Sorrow can be alleviated by good sleep, a bath and a glass of wine.
Three things are necessary for the salvation of man: to know what he ought to believe; to know
what he ought to desire; and to know what he ought to do.
Reason in man is rather like God in the world.
Libertarianism is a political philosophy holding importantly, for Nozick, unlike other social con-
that the role of the state in society ought to be tract theorists, individual rights do not result
severely limited. Nozick’s main defense of lib- from, but exist prior to, any social contract, and
ertarianism is a moral one. According to him the put severe constraints on the shape such a con-
strongest reason to advocate a libertarian society tract can take. Furthermore, the parties to the con-
is simply that such advocacy follows from a seri- tract in Nozick’s conception are to be imagined very
ous respect for individual rights. Nozick takes his much on the model of human beings as we know
position to follow from a basic moral principle them in “real life,” rather than along the lines of the
associated with Immanuel Kant and enshrined in highly abstractly conceived rational agents deliber-
Kant’s second formulation of his famous Categor- ating behind a “veil of ignorance” in Rawls’s “orig-
ical Imperative: “Act so that you treat humanity, inal position” thought experiment.
whether in your own person or in that of anoth-
er, always as an end and never as a means only.”
Certainly the emphasis I place in this chapter on coordination of behavior and cooperation to
mutual benefit is something that ought to be very congenial to people in the libertarian tradi-
tion.
The fundamental question of political philosophy, one that precedes questions about how the
state should be organized, is whether there should be any state at all. Why not have anarchy?
And although it might be best of all to be Socrates satisfied, having both happiness and depth,
we would give up some happiness in order to gain the depth
Moore argued that we cannot equate moral terms ident propositions which recommend themselves
to natural terms and when one does try to do to moral reflection, but which are not susceptible
so they are committing a Naturalistic Fallacy. to either direct proof or disproof), a view often de-
Moore’s reasoning for this was based upon David scribed as Ethical Intuitionism.
Hume’s “is-ought” problem.
In the “Principia Ethica”, Moore argued that most
other philosophers working in Ethics made a G.E. Moore’s Ethical Views
mistake he called the “Naturalistic Fallacy” when
they tried to prove an ethical claim by appealing
to a definition of the term «good» in terms of one The lot of critics is to be remembered by
or more natural properties (e.g. “pleasant”, “de- what they failed to understand.
sired”, etc). According to Moore, the term “good” (in It does not matter how badly you paint so
the sense of intrinsic value) is in fact indefinable, long as you don’t paint badly like other peo-
because it names a simple, non-natural prop- ple.
erty, and cannot be analyzed in terms of any oth-
er property. His argument (often called the Open All moral laws are merely statements that
Question Argument) is that the question “What is certain kinds of actions will have good ef-
good?” is an open one, because «good» cannot be fects.
defined in terms of any natural property like “blue”
“A great artist is always before his time or be-
or “rough” or “smooth” or “smelly”: it lacks natu-
hind it.”
ral properties. Thus, when a Hedonist, for exam-
ple, claims “Anything that is pleasant is also good”, “Moral conduct, or duty, is defined as the
it is always possible to counter with «That thing is obligation to select that action which will
pleasant, but is it good?” achieve more good than any alternative ac-
tion....”
Moore further argued that, once arguments based
on the naturalistic fallacy had been discarded, ques- “For it is the business of Ethics, I must insist,
tions of intrinsic goodness could only be settled by ap- not only to obtain true results, but also to
peal to what he called “moral intuitions” (self-ev- find valid reasons for them.”
Charles Stevenson argued that moral state- When we use the terms ‘good’ and ‘right’, we express
ments are deeply held beliefs (Moral Stements= our approval. The whole point of ethics is to influ-
Deeply held beliefs). Charles Stevenson argues ence how we behave. We use moral judgements to
that moral words have emotive meanings. The sen- express our feelings and to influence the feelings
tence ‘You stole that money’ has a purely descrip- and actions of other people. Words with emotive
tive meaning, viz. that you took money that did not meaning do just that. Emotivism connects caring,
belong to you without permission from the owner. approving, disapproving, with the very meaning of
But it can be used with an emotive meaning (‘you ethical words.
stole that money!’), a meaning that expresses
disapproval. Many moral terms (‘steal’, ‘hones-
ty’, ‘respect’) have both descriptive and emotive
meanings. The central ones, though, ‘right’, ‘wrong’,
‘good’, and ‘bad’ only have emotive meanings.
Persuasion depends on the sheer, direct emotional impact of words—on emotive meaning, rhetorical
cadence, apt metaphor, stentorian, stimulating, or pleading tones of voice, dramatic gestures, care in
establishing rapport with the hearer or audience, and so on. … A redirection of the hearer’s attitudes is
sought not by the mediating step of altering his beliefs, but by exhortation, whether obvious or subtle,
crude or refined
R. M. Hare argued that one makes moral state- There is a difference of emphasis between ‘good
ment they are not just expressing their belief but action’ and ‘right action’: ‘good action’ com-
they are prescribing or recommending a course mends the action without necessarily com-
of action-A way one should behave! So accord- manding it – we are saying it should be praised,
ing to R.M. Hare when someone says “Murder is but not necessarily that you have to do it to be a
wrong”. He is not only saying that I dislike or di- good person. If we say an action is the ‘right ac-
approve of murder but also saying that “No one tion’, then we are commanding it – it is a guide-
should ever murder”. line for behaviour that people should follow.
This difference of prescriptivism from emotiv-
ism, he claimed, allows a greater role for reason
in moral discussion. Presciptivism works like
commands, also known as imperatives. Hare ar-
gued that if I say ‘Eating meat is wrong’, I am say-
ing ‘Don’t eat meat’. We use the word ‘good’, says
Hare, when we want to commend something to
someone.
“Our ultimate moral principles can become so completely accepted by us, that we treat them,
not as universal imperatives but as matters of fact; they have the same obstinate indubitabili-
ty.”
“The ordinary man so very rarely questions the principles in which he has been brought
up, that he is usually willing, whenever he has a feeling that he ought to do ‘x’, to say on this
ground that he ought to do ‘x’.”
Herbert Spencer is best known for the expres- Beginning with the ‘laws of life’, the conditions
sion “survival of the fittest”, which he coined of social existence, and the recognition of life as
in Principles of Biology (1864), after reading a fundamental value, moral science can deduce
Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species. This what kinds of laws promote life and produce
term strongly suggests natural selection, yet as happiness. Spencer’s ethics and political philoso-
Spencer extended evolution into realms of so- phy, then, depends on a theory of ‘natural law,’ and
ciology and ethics. it is because of this that, he maintained, evolution-
ary theory could provide a basis for a comprehen-
Spencer saw human life on a continuum with, but sive political and even philosophical theory.
also as the culmination of, a lengthy process of evo-
lution, and he held that human society reflects the
same evolutionary principles as biological organ-
isms do in their development. Society–and social
institutions such as the economy–can, he be-
lieved, function without external control, just as
the digestive system or a lower organism does
(though, in arguing this, Spencer failed to see
the fundamental differences between ‘higher’
and ‘lower’ levels of social organization). For
Spencer, all natural and social development reflect-
ed ‘the universality of law’.
“Ethics has to recognize the truth, recognized in unethical thought that egoism comes before
altruism.”
“Unless each duly cares for himself, his care for all others is ended in death, and if each thus
dies there remain no others to be cared for.”
In the strong version of rational egoism defended Wealth is the product of man’s capacity to think.
by Rand, not only is it rational to pursue one’s own Money is only a tool. It will take you wherever
interests, it is irrational not to pursue them. you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver.
In Ethics, Nietzsche called himself an “immoral- In the absence of God, then, all values, truths and
ist” and harshly criticized the prominent moral standards must be created by us rather than merely
schemes of his day, including Christianity, Kan- handed to us by some outside agency, which Ni-
tianism and Utilitarianism. However, rather than de- etzsche (and the Existentialists who later embraced
stroying morality, Nietzsche wanted a re-evalua- this idea) as a tremendously empowering, even if
tion of the values of Judeo-Christianity, preferring not a comforting, thing. His solution to the vacuum
the more naturalistic source of value which he left by the absence of religion was essentially to “be
found in the vital impulses of life itself. In his “Be- yourself”, to be true to oneself, to be uninhibited,
yond Good and Evil” in particular he argued that to live life to the full, and to have the strength of
we must go beyond the simplistic Christian idea mind to carry through one’s own project, regard-
of Good and Evil in our consideration of morality. less of any obstacles or concerns for other people,
Nietzsche saw the prevailing Christian system of the weak, etc. This was his major premise, and also
faith as not only incorrect but as harmful to so- the goal towards which he thought all Ethics should
ciety, because it effectively allowed the weak to be directed.
rule the strong, stifled artistic creativity, and, crit-
ically, suppressed the “will to power” which he
saw as the driving force of human character. He
had an ingrained distrust of overarching and
indiscriminate rules, and strongly believed that
individual people were entitled to individual
kinds of behavior and access to individual areas
of knowledge.
When you stare into the abyss the abyss stares back at you.
He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze
for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
When you look into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you.
Blessed are the forgetful: for they get the better even of their blunders.
One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star.
Schopenhauer
man to survive and to reproduce) was the driving
force of the world and that the pursuit of happi-
ness, love and intellectual satisfaction was essen-
tially futile and anyway secondary to the innate
imperative of procreation.
Schopenhauer was very much an atypical philosopher. All truth passes through three stages. First, it
He was genuinely interested and knowledgeable about is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed.
Hinduism and Buddhism, and the only major Western Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
philosopher to draw serious parallels between Western
A man can do what he wants, but not want
and Eastern Philosophy. He was the first major philoso-
what he wants.
pher to be openly atheist, and was unusual in placing the
arts and Aesthetics so highly. Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see.
Schopenhauer called himself a Kantian, and his
starting point was certainly Kant’s division of the Compassion is the basis of morality.
universe into the phenomenal (things as they ap- To live alone is the fate of all great souls.
pear, and which can be perceived using our senses) Life swings like a pendulum backward and for-
and the noumenal (the “thing-in-itself”, which is in-
ward between pain and boredom.
dependent of us and which can only be thought or
imagined by humans). Every man takes the limits of his own field of
vision for the limits of the world.
Schopenhauer then expanded on what this Will ac-
tually was, deriving his arguments from the main After your death you will be what you were be-
traditions of Western Philosophy, but arriving at a fore your birth.
kind of Voluntarism almost entirely consistent with
Change alone is eternal, perpetual, immortal.
the Hindu Vedanta traditions in the Upanishads, which
he knew well. He believed that the “will-to-life” (the Every parting gives a foretaste of death, every
force driving man to remain alive and to reproduce) was reunion a hint of the resurrection.
the inner content and the driving force of the world, and
that Will and desire were ontologically prior to thought
and the intellect (and even to being). He also sub-
scribed to the Contractarianism of Thomas Hobbes,
and deemed the state (and state violence) necessary to
check the destructive tendencies innate to our species.
All the arguments to prove man’s superiority cannot shatter this hard fact: in suffering the an-
imals are our equals.
If possessing a higher degree of intelligence does not entitle one human to use another for his
or her own ends, how can it entitle humans to exploit non-humans?
What one generation finds ridiculous, the next accepts; and the third shudders when it looks
back on what the first did.
If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing any-
thing of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it.
Extreme poverty is not only a condition of unsatisfied material needs. It is often accompanied
by a degrading state of powerlessness.
We are, quite literally, gambling with the future of our planet- for the sake of hamburgers
Personal purity isn’t really the issue. Not supporting animal abuse – and persuading others not
to support it – is.
If we are prepared to take the life of another being merely in order to satisfy our taste for a par-
ticular type of food, then that being is no more than a means to our end.
Lawrence Kohlberg expanded on the earlier work formal operational thought is attained), which only
of cognitive theorist Jean Piaget to explain the a few fully achieve. Each level of morality contains
moral development of children. Kohlberg believed two stages, which provide the basis for moral de-
that moral development, like cognitive develop- velopment in various contexts. Kohlberg defined
ment, follows a series of stages. He used the idea three levels of moral development: precon-
of moral dilemmas—stories that present conflict- ventional, conventional, and postconventional.
ing ideas about two moral values—to teach 10 to Each level has two distinct stages. Each level is
16 year-old boys about morality and values. The associated with increasingly complex stages of
best known moral dilemma created by Kohlberg is moral development.
the “Heinz” dilemma, which discusses the idea
of obeying the law versus saving a life. Kohlberg
emphasized that it is the way an individual rea-
sons about a dilemma that determines positive
moral development.
For the first time in human history, there seems to be a radical increase in the proportion reach-
ing principled morality.
All individuals in all cultures use the same thirty basic moral categories, concepts, or principles,
and all individuals in all cultures go through the same order or sequence of gross stage devel-
opment, though they vary in rate and terminal point of development.
The normative theoretical claim that a higher stage is philosophically a better stage is one nec-
essary part of a psychological explanation of sequential stage movement.
The first meaning of ‘cognitive’ for us is that observations of others are made phenomenolog-
ically: i.e., by attempting to take the role of the other, to see things from his or her conscious
viewpoint.
It seems obvious that moral stages must primarily be the products of the child’s interaction
with others rather than the direct unfolding of biological or neurological structures.
Jean Paul Sartre is regarded as the father of Ex- The ’ethics of authenticity’ is at the very heart of
istentialist philosophy. Existentialism is widely existentialism. It emphasises the absolute charac-
considered to be the philosophical and cultural ter of the free commitment by which every man re-
movement which holds that the starting point alizes himself in realizing a type of humanity. Sartre
of philosophical thinking must be the individu- very emphatically states that “Freedom,” “Choice”,
al and the experiences of the individual. Existen- and “Self-Commitment.”, are the three pillars
tialists generally believe that traditional systematicon which the ethic of authenticity is erected. It is
or academic philosophies are too abstract and away often taken to mean that one has to create oneself”
from concrete human experience. and then live in accordance with this self. What is
meant by authenticity is that in acting, one should
A central proposition of existentialism is that act as oneself, not as “one”’ acts or as ‘”one’s genes’
“existence precedes essence”, which means that or any other essence requires. The authentic act is
the most important consideration for the indi- one that is in accordance with one’s freedom.
vidual is the fact that he or she is an individu-
al— an independently acting and responsible
conscious being (’existence “) — rather than
what labels, roles, stereotypes, definitions, or
other preconceived categories the individual
fits (“’essence’). The actual life of the individual
is what constitutes what could be called his or her
“true essence” instead of there being an arbitrarily
“attributed essence” used by others to define him
or her. Thus, human beings, through their own ‘con-
sciousness” create their own values and determine
a meaning to their life.
Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for ev-
erything he does.
When the rich wage war it’s the poor who die.
If you are lonely when you are alone, you are in bad company.
Every existing thing is born without reason, prolongs itself out of weakness, and dies by
chance.
Only the guy who isn’t rowing has time to rock the boat.
A common way to understand Confucian eth- righteousness for the sake of righteousness. Con-
ics is that it is virtue ethics. One of the deepest fucius’s political thought is based upon his ethical
teachings of Confucius may have been the supe- thought. He argued that the best government
riority of personal exemplification over explicit is one that rules through “rites” and people’s
rules of behavior. His moral teachings empha- natural morality, and not by using bribery and
sized self-cultivation, emulation of moral exem- coercion. He explained that this is one of the most
plars, and the attainment of skilled judgment important analects: “If the people be led by laws,
rather than knowledge of rules. Confucian eth- and uniformity sought to be given them by pun-
ics may, therefore, be considered a type of vir- ishments, they will try to avoid the punishment,
tue ethics. His teachings rarely rely on reasoned but have no sense of shame. If they be led by vir-
argument, and ethical ideals and methods are tue, and uniformity sought to be given them by
conveyed indirectly, through allusion, innuendo, the rules of propriety, they will have the sense
and even tautology. His teachings require exam- of the shame, and moreover will become good.”
ination and context to be understood. While he supported the idea of government ruling
by a virtuous king, his ideas contained a number of
One of his teachings was a variant of the Golden elements to limit the power of rulers. He argued for
Rule, sometimes called the “Silver Rule” owing to its representing truth in language, and honesty was of
negative form: - “What you do not wish for your- paramount importance.
self, do not do to others.” A virtuous disposition
without knowledge is susceptible to corruption,
and virtuous action without sincerity is not true
righteousness. Cultivating knowledge and sincerity
is also important for one’s own sake; the superior
person loves learning for the sake of learning and
It does not matter how slowly you go so long as you do not stop.
Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life.
Death and life have their determined appointments; riches and honors depend upon heaven.
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.
Democritus
Democritus’ Ethical Views
Democritus’ philosophical views can be summarized ful ones, and through conforming to conventional
into one word called Atomism. Atomism is the theory morality. He is quoted as saying, “The brave man is
that all of reality and all the objects in the universe he who overcomes not only his enemies but his plea-
are composed of very small, indivisible and inde- sures”.
structible building blocks known as atoms (from
the Greek «atomos», meaning «uncuttable»).
Democritus-Famous Quotes
There is no room in this theory for the con-
cept of a God, and essentially Atomism is a type
of Materialism or Physicalism, as well as being athe- Nothing exists except atoms and empty space;
istic and deterministic in its outlook. However, everything else is opinion.
Democritus did allow for the existence of the human Happiness resides not in possessions and not
soul, which he saw as composed of a special kind in gold, happiness dwells in the soul.
of spherical atom, in constant motion, and he ex-
plained the senses in a similar manner. Everything existing in the universe is the fruit
of chance and necessity.
In Epistemology, Democritus distinguished two By desiring little, a poor man makes himself
types of knowledge: “bastard” (subjective and rich.
insufficient knowledge, obtained by perception The wrongdoer is more unfortunate than the
through the senses), and “legitimate (genuine man wronged.
knowledge obtained by the processing of this
unreliable “bastard” knowledge using inductive rea- It is greed to do all the talking but not to want
soning). to listen at all.
Our sins are more easily remembered than
In the field of Ethics, Democritus pursued a type of ear- our good deeds.
ly Hedonism or Epicureanism. He was one of the earli-
est thinkers to explicit posit a supreme good or goal, Tis hard to fight with anger, but the prudent
which he called cheerfulness or well-being (see the man keeps it under control.
section on Eudaimonism) and identified with the un- Hope of ill gain is the beginning of loss.
troubled enjoyment of life. He saw this as achiev-
Throw moderation to the winds, and the great-
able through moderation in the pursuit of pleasure,
est pleasures bring the greatest pains.
through distinguishing useful pleasures from harm-
“The Theory of Moral Sentiments” was Smith’s “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the
first published work, but he himself considered it Wealth of Nations”, published in 1776, is a clear-
his most important, and he continued to revise the ly written account of political economy at the
dawn of the Industrial Revolution. In it, he ex-
work throughout his life. It provided the ethical, phil-
osophical, psychological and methodological un- pands on three main concepts that together
derpinnings to his later works, and it was actually form the foundation of free market econom-
in this work that Smith first referred to the “invisi- ics and Capitalism: the division of labor, the pur-
ble hand” to describe the apparent benefits to so- suit of self interest and freedom of trade. He ar-
ciety of people behaving in their own interests. In gued in the “Wealth of Nations” that, while human
the book, he critically examined the moral thinking motives are often selfishness and greed, the
of the time, with the aim of explaining how mankind competition in the free market would tend to
can form moral judgments in spite of its natural in- benefit society as a whole by keeping prices low,
clination toward self-interest. while still building in an incentive for a wide va-
riety of goods and services. He further argued
He concluded that conscience arises from so- that a division of labor would affect a great in-
cial relationships, and proposed a theory crease in production which will bring common
of “sympathy” in which the act of observing happiness.
others makes people aware of themselves and
of the morality of their own behavior. While
at first glance this Altruism seems to contra-
dict the Egoism and Individualism found in his later
works (the so-called “Adam Smith Problem”), it
should be noted that he was also suggesting that in-
dividuals would actually find it in their own self-in-
terest to develop this sympathy.
It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner,
but from their regard to their own interest.
The real tragedy of the poor is the poverty of their aspirations.
All money is a matter of belief.
Man is an animal that makes bargains: no other animal does this - no dog exchanges bones with
another.
Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition.
Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of
conscience.
No complaint... is more common than that of a scarcity of money.
Humanity is the virtue of a woman, generosity that of a man.
Resentment seems to have been given us by nature for a defense, and for a defense only! It is the
safeguard of justice and the security of innocence.
Although he never considered himself a philosopher over all other considerations, whether morality or the
(and often overtly rejected philosophical inquiry good of citizens–as evidence that he was received by
as irrelevant), many subsequent political his near-contemporaries as a theorist of the state. Ev-
philosophers have been influenced by his ideas. ery action must be considered in light of its effect on
His name has since passed into common usage to the state, not in terms of its intrinsic moral value.
refer to any political move that is devious or cun-
ning in nature, although this probably represents a Niccole Machiavelli’s –Views on
more extreme view than Machiavelli actually took.
In The Prince, Machiavelli concentrates on those Human Nature
techniques a successful politician must use if he is to
achieve his political ends, without regard to the moral Machiavelli asserts that a number of traits are inher-
justification of the means thereby employed. ent in human nature. People are generally self-inter-
ested, although their affection for others can be won
Machiavelli considers how best a leader can achieve
and lost. They are content and happy so long they
his ends once he has determined that the ends he has
are not victims of something terrible. They may be
identified are worthwhile. Machiavelli thinks there
trustworthy in prosperous times, but they will quick-
are three primary political ‘goods’ viz. national se-
curity, national independence, and a strong consti- ly turn selfish, deceitful, and profit-driven in times of
tution. adversity. People admire honor, generosity, courage,
and piety in others, but most of them do not exhib-
Machiavelli defines virtues as the range of capacities it these virtues themselves. Ambition is commonly
that each citizen needs to possess: the capacities that found among those who have achieved some power,
enable them to serve the common good, thereby to but most common people are satisfied with the status
uphold the freedom of their community, and its conse- quo and therefore do not yearn for increased status.
quence to ensure its rise to greatness as well as their
own liberty. He describes virtues as the qualities that The people’s goodwill is always the best defense
are praised by others, such as generosity, compassion, against both domestic insurrection and foreign ag-
and piety. However, he is of the view that vices should gression. Machiavelli warns against doing things that
not be pursued for their own sake, just as virtue might result in hatred. People will naturally feel a
should not be pursued for its own sake: virtues and sense of obligation after receiving a favor or service,
vices should be conceived as means to an end. and this bond is usually not easily broken. Neverthe-
less, loyalties are won and lost, and goodwill is never
Machiavelli believed in “reason of state” – the doc- absolute.
trine that the good of the state itself takes precedence
A successful Machiavellian leader consists of five crucial characteristics and traits. These traits are the
deciding factor in whether or not the leader will be successful.
Men judge generally more by the eye than by the hand, for everyone can see and few can feel.
Everyone sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are.
It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both.
Politics have no relation to morals.
If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared.
He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command.
Where the willingness is great, the difficulties cannot be great.
Never was anything great achieved without danger.
One who deceives will always find those who allow themselves to be deceived.
The promise given was a necessity of the past: the word broken is a necessity of the present.
There is no avoiding war; it can only be postponed to the advantage of others.
In ethics, Cudworth’s outstanding work is A Trea- tion. In addition, Calvinists were Fatalists, rejecting
tise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morali- the concept of human free will. If free will existed,
ty, directed against Puritan Calvinism, against the they would argue, an individual would have more
divine omnipotence discussed by René Descartes, power over their own actions than had God. This
and against the Hobbesian reduction of morali- would compromise God’s absolute power. Human
ty to civil obedience. Cudworth stressed the natural actions would also be contingent, and thus, unpre-
good or evil inherent in an event or an act in dictable. This would compromise His omniscience.
contrast to the Calvinist-Cartesian notion of divine Neither compromise was acceptable to the Calvin-
law or to Hobbes’s concept of a secular sovereign. ists, so they restricted all agency to the omnipotence
“Things are what they are,” he wrote, “not by Will of the Supreme Being. Finally, Calvinism taught that,
but by Nature.” This premise led Cudworth to as a result of Original Sin, man’s nature was totally
develop an ethical system emphasizing the rational, depraved, and irremediable through human efforts.
spontaneous, disinterested, and public-spirited Unable to control his fate, man was wholly depen-
character of the good life. dent on God for his moral status. Neither his reason,
nor his will could improve his character.
Orthodox Calvinists are voluntarists. To them,
God is primarily omnipotent, and nothing, not
even logic, can restrain Him. As a consequence,
Calvinists are also Enthusiasts, to whom all theo-
logical knowledge came to man through divine rev-
elation. Man’s rational powers, bound to logic, are
simply useless with reference to God. Believing that
theology is the only acceptable grounding for eth-
ics, this implies, to Calvinists that ethical standards
are similarly dependent on divine fiat and revela-
The Cambridge Platonists unanimously rejected all ical positions. Education and rational persuasion
of the positions held by Calvinists. Cudworth called are the only methods required to correct differenc-
them “the theory of the arbitrary deity.” Their goal es that exist between good people on fundamental
was to vindicate the power of the human intel- matters. Because man’s theological and ethical
lect, and human moral responsibility. To do oth- deliberations were capable of yielding some re-
erwise, in their eyes, rendered any conception of sults, he must be, at least to the limited extent
God’s wisdom and goodness meaningless. that his finite reasoning faculty allows, capable
of taking some remedial steps towards his own
Instead, they supported a natural theology which salvation.
could prove the existence of God. Beyond these
basic points, disputes between individuals with This position is formally known as “Latitudinar-
different beliefs could and should be settled with ianism.” It would dominate Cudworth’s writings
debate, when this was possible. When this meth- and sermons, beginning with A Sermon before
od failed to produce a definitive resolution, they the House of Commons.
argued, differences between belief systems should
be tolerated in the spirit of humility. If humanity
really needed to understand something, God,
as a rational and benevolent entity, would al-
low it the information required to develop an
understanding. Thus, all people who make an
honest effort to understand God, should and, in
fact, did, come up with the same basic theolog-
Knowledge is not a passion from without the mind, but an active exertion of the inward strength,
vigor and power of the mind, displaying itself from within.
Now all the knowledge and wisdom that is in creatures, whether angels or men, is nothing else
but a participation of that one eternal, immutable and increased wisdom of God.
The true knowledge or science which exists nowhere but in the mind itself, has no other entity
at all besides intelligibility; and therefore whatsoever is clearly intelligible, is absolutely true.
Sense is a line, the mind is a circle. Sense is like a line which is the flux of a point running out
from itself, but intellect like a circle that keeps within itself.
Auguste Comte
Auguste Comte’s Ethical Views
Comte’s main legacy is his influential theory of Positiv- For Comte, the goal of Positivism had always been
ism, the idea that the only authentic knowledge is sci- moral order and the reformation of the social order
entific knowledge. He saw the scientific method as it would bring, rather than material advances or af-
replacing Metaphysics and theology in the history fluence.
of thought, and believed that Metaphysics should be
replaced by a hierarchy of sciences, from mathe- Auguste Comte-Famous Quotes
matics at the base to sociology at the top.
Comte developed his theory of a universal law, which The dead govern the living.
was at work in all societies and sciences, and through
which progress is inevitable and irreversible. He Each department of knowledge passes through
called this the Law of Three Phases, the three phases three stages. The theoretic stage; the theolog-
being: ical stage and the metaphysical or abstract
stage.
• the theological (the pre-Enlightenment phase
in which man›s place in society was referenced Men are not allowed to think freely about
to God or nature, in which the divine will subsume chemistry and biology: why should they be
human rights, and man blindly believed in allowed to think freely about political philos-
whatever he was taught by his ancestors); ophy?
• the metaphysical (the post-Enlighten- The only real life is the collective life of the
ment humanist phase, referenced to explanations race; individual life has no existence except as
by impersonal abstract thought, and where an abstraction.
the universal rights of humanity are most
Every science consists in the coordination of
important); facts; if the different observations were entire-
• the positive (the final scientific stage in which the ly isolated, there would be no science.
search for absolute knowledge is abandoned, sci- Know yourself to improve yourself.
entific explanation is based on observation,
experiment and comparison, and individual To understand a science, it is necessary to
rights are considered more important than the know its history.
rule of any one person).
Knowledge is power
Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested.
Reading maketh a full man; conference a ready man; and writing an exact man.
Read not to contradict and confute; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and dis-
course; but to weigh and consider.
Histories make men wise; poets, witty; the mathematics, subtile; natural philosophy, deep;
moral, grave; logic and rhetoric, able to contend.
Who questions much, shall learn much, and retain much.
In charity there is no excess.
Our humanity is a poor thing, except for the divinity that stirs within us.
A wise man will make more opportunities than he finds.
There is no comparison between that which is lost by not succeeding and that which is lost by
not trying.
George Berkeley
George Berkeley’s Ethical Views
In 1710, still only 25 years old, his “Treatise perceptions or qualities) sent from God and not
concerning the Principles of Human Knowl- the things themselves, and he effectively chose
edge” was published, his first exposition of the then to make knowledge of self and knowledge of
revolutionary theory that objects exist only as per- God specific exceptions from the Empiricist mantra
ception and not as matter separate from perception, that experience is the source of all knowledge.
summed up in his dictum «Esse est percipi” (“To be
is to be perceived”). The work is beautifully writ-
ten and dense with cogent arguments, no matter
how counter-intuitive the system may appear at George Berkeley-Famous Quotes
first sight.
He called the theory Immaterialism (conceived as it Truth is the cry of all, but the game of few.
was in opposition to the prevailing Materialism of
the time), although it was later referred to by The same principles which at first view lead
others as Subjective Idealism. The theory pro- to skepticism, pursued to a certain point,
pounds the view that reality consists exclusively bring men back to common sense.
of minds and their ideas, and that individuals can That neither our thoughts, nor passions, nor
only directly know sensations and ideas, not the ideas formed by the imagination, exist with-
objects themselves. The position that the mind is out the mind, is what everybody will allow.
the only thing that can be known to exist (and that
Others indeed may talk, and write, and fight
knowledge of anything outside the mind is unjus-
about liberty, and make an outward pretence
tified) is known as Solipsism, and forms the root of
the later doctrine of Phenomenalism. It can also be to it; but the free-thinker alone is truly free.
seen as an extreme type of Empiricism, whereby He who says there is no such thing as an hon-
any knowledge of the empirical world is to be ob- est man, you may be sure is himself a knave.
tained only through direct perception. All the choir of heaven and furniture of earth
In that respect, then, he was an Empiricist, although - in a word, all those bodies which compose
he differed from Locke or Hume in believing that the frame of the world - have not any subsis-
what we were «experiencing» were only ideas (or tence without a mind.
Clarke adopted some form of rationalism in In his philosophical writings, he argues that
metaphysics, ethics, and theology, as exhibited freedom of the will involves a libertarian power
in his methodology, his account of ethical truths, of self-determination. However, in the sermon
and in his acceptance of a fundamental rational- “Of the Liberty of Moral Agents,” he claims that
ist principle, the principle of sufficient reason. the “True liberty of a Rational and Moral Agent”
is “being able to follow right Reason only, with-
Clarke is also an ethical rationalist. Ethical truths out Hindrance or Restraint”.
are discoverable through reason and correspond to
necessary and eternal relations among things in the Clarke’s primary defense of libertarian freedom
world. He also calls ethical truths “truths of rea- involves clarifying the relationship between the
son.” His theology is also rationalist, in that through will and the judgment. In order to will, one must
reason one can discover the many truths contained have a judgment about what to do and the pow-
in natural religion. er to choose in accordance with that judgment.
Clarke attached great importance to the issue of
free will and he may have introduced the mod-
ern philosophical meaning of the term “agency”.
The difficulty over the question of eternal torments lies in how it is irreconcilable with the
Goodness of God
There are eternal and necessary differences (or “reasons”) of things, from which “necessarily
arises an agreement or disagreement of some things with others, or a fitness or unfitness of the
application of different things or different relations one to another”
God wills to act according to eternal reasons of things
Lao Tzu
approach to life.
His essay “Civil Disobedience” of 1849 has been Thoreau was a committed anti-slavery activist and,
perhaps the most influential of his works because despite his deep-rooted Individualism, he was
of its overt political implications. He boldly as- readily moved to activism against injustice. The
serted that “the only obligation which I have a right well-known essay “Civil Disobedience” was not
to assume is to do at any time what I think right”. Thoreau›s final word on resistance against injustice
He believed that radical social reforms (such as and oppression: his strongest critiques of American
the abolition of slavery, for example) could be society lay in his later public addresses, “Slavery in
effected only when each right-minded individu- Massachusetts”, “Life without Principle” and “A
al takes direct action on his own part. This form Plea for Captain John Brown”.
of “peaceful revolution” could be achieved by
an individual withdrawing his allegiance «in Like Karl Marx, he sought to some extent to dis-
person and property» from the government that mantle existing institutions in an attempt to
supports or permits the abuse in question (such as, provide full human satisfaction.
for example, refusing to pay taxes). This philoso-
phy of civil disobedience and non-violent resis-
tance has been specifically credited by such later
figures as Leo Tolstoy, Mahatma Gandhi and Mar-
tin Luther King Jr.
Go confidently in the direction of your dreams. Live the life you have imagined.
It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see.
Max Weber
“disenchantment”, which he associated with the rise of
capitalism and modernity. Weber also made a variety
of other contributions in economic history, as well as
economic theory and methodology.
The fate of our times is characterized by rationalization and intellectualization and, above all,
by the disenchantment of the world.
It is not wise to apply to public administration the sort of moral and ethical norms we apply to
matters of personal conscience. It is important to realize that the state bureaucracy might pos-
sess its own independent bureaucratic morality.
The ethic of conviction and the ethic of responsibility are not opposites. They are complemen-
tary to one another.
Causal analysis provides absolutely no value judgment, and a value judgment is absolutely not
a causal explanation.
A highly developed stock exchange cannot be a club for the cult of ethics.
Within the confines of the lecture hall, no other virtue exists but plain intellectual integrity.
One can say that three pre-eminent qualities are decisive for the politician: passion, a feeling of
responsibility, and a sense of proportion.
Abraham Lincoln
12 months aggregate; he became an avid reader and re-
tained a lifelong interest in learning. He was not only
a statesman and political leader but a moral force
that changed the way Americans viewed social re-
lations.
Abraham Lincoln was a self-made man in a way that “Whatever you are, be a good one.”
we no longer use the term “self-made.” When we use it, “Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them
we usually have in mind a businessperson, and we use my friends?”
it to mean they have achieved upward social mobility,
specifically in financial terms. If we go back to Lincoln’s “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you
time, we find the term “self-made” used in a different, want to test a man’s character, give him power.”
much more comprehensive way, one that does not ex- “When I do good, I feel good. When I do bad, I
clude success in business, but is by no means restricted feel bad. That’s my religion.”
to it.
“Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it
Moral integrity occupied the core of the kind of person not for themselves”
Lincoln made himself. Financial honesty represented “I am a slow walker, but I never walk back.”
one important aspect of this integrity. When his part-
ner in a grocery business, William Berry, died in 1835, “When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot
leaving behind serious debts, Lincoln worked long and and hang on.”
hard to pay off not only his own share but Berry’s as “Be sure you put your feet in the right place, then
well, going beyond his legal obligation in doing so. stand firm.”
There are many examples of Lincoln’s extraordinary “I would rather be a little nobody, then to be a
intellectual honesty in his political career. Lincoln evil somebody.”
opposed slavery not only on political grounds but on “The best way to predict your future is to create
moral grounds. He considered every human being has it.”
worth which is expressed through dignity. Lincoln
modeled the balance between moral certainty and Always bear in mind that your own resolution to
moral humility. He was certain enough about his beliefs succeed is more important than any other.
to act on them, but humble enough about his beliefs to The best thing about the future is that it comes
acknowledge at least the possibility he might be wrong. one day at a time.
On April 14, 1865, John Wilkes Booth assassinated
President Abraham Lincoln while he was watching Our
American Cousin at Ford Theater in Washington, D.C.
Live life as though nobody is watching, and express yourself as though everyone is listening.
One of the most difficult things is not to change society — but to change yourself.
As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.
Difficulties break some men but make others. No axe is sharp enough to cut the soul of a sinner
who keeps on trying, one armed with the hope that he will rise even in the end.
Everyone can rise above their circumstances and achieve success if they are dedicated to and
passionate about what they do.
A winner is a dreamer who never gives up.
Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.
To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances
the freedom of others.
Do not judge me by my successes, judge me by how many times I fell down and got back up again.
If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his
language, that goes to his heart.
If you want to make peace with your enemy, you have to work with your enemy. Then he be-
comes your partner.
There is no passion to be found playing small – in settling for a life that is less than the one you
are capable of living.
It always seems impossible until it’s done.
We must use time wisely and forever realize that the time is always ripe to do right.
Man’s goodness is a flame that can be hidden but never extinguished.
Resentment is like drinking poison and then hoping it will kill your enemies.
When people are determined they can overcome anything.
I never lose. I either win or learn.
Forgiveness liberates the soul. It removes fear. That is why it is such a powerful weapon.
A good head and a good heart are always a formidable combination.
While poverty persists, there is no true freedom
I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul.
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond
measure.
Action without vision is only passing time, vision without action is merely day dreaming, but
vision with action can change the world.
Courageous people do not fear forgiving, for the sake of peace.
People respond in accordance to how you treat them.
Buddha seeks a middle way between the ex- The core of Buddhist teachings is encapsulated
tremes of dogmatism and skepticism, empha- in the four noble truths. The truths are:
sizing personal experience, a pragmatic attitude,
and the use of critical thinking toward all types 1) Dukkha (suffering, incapable of satisfying,
of knowledge. In ethics, the Buddha proposes a painful) is an innate characteristic of existence
threefold understanding of action: mental, ver- with each rebirth;
bal, and bodily.
2) Samudaya (origin, cause) of this dukkha is the
The Buddha defined his teaching as “the mid- “craving, desire or attachment”;
dle way”. In the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta,
3) Nirodha (cessation, ending) of this dukkha can
this is used to refer to the fact that his teachings
be attained by eliminating all “craving, desire,
steer a middle course between the extremes of
and attachment”;
asceticism and bodily denial (as practiced by
the Jains and other ascetic groups) and sensual 4) Magga (path, Noble Eightfold Path) is the means
hedonism or indulgence. Many sramanas of the to end this dukkha.
Buddha’s time placed much emphasis on a denial of
the body, using practices such as fasting, to liberate
the mind from the body. The Buddha, however, re-
alized that the mind was embodied and causally de-
pendent on the body, and therefore that a malnour-
ished body did not allow the mind to be trained and
developed. Thus, Buddhism’s main concern is
not with luxury or poverty, but instead with the
human response to circumstances.
Live and allow others to live; hurt no one; life is dear to all living beings.
All are my friends. I have no enemies.
Don’t accumulate if you do not need. The excess of wealth in your hands is for the society, and
you are the trustee for the same.
Start the practice of self-control with some penance; begin with fasting.
Do not deprive someone of his livelihood. This is a sinful tendency.
Anger begets more anger, and forgiveness and love lead to more forgiveness and love.
Soul is the central point of spiritual discipline.
The most important principle of environment is that you are not the only element.
One who neglects or disregards the existence of earth, air, fire, water and vegetation disregards
his own existence which is entwined with them.
By sincerity, a man gains physical, mental and linguistic straightforwardness, and harmonious
tendency; that is, congruence of speech and action.
Kautilya was known for his sharp opinion on a) Open war: War fought between states
each of the four dimension framework of: war
and peace, human rights, international econom- b) Concealed war: It is fought on the lines of
ic justice and world order. He proposed welfare guerrilla warfare
state but encouraged war for preserving the
c) Silent war: It is fought continuously in-
power of the state. He strongly believed that a
side the kingdom itself
king should constantly struggle to augment his
power. This coincides with Weber’s view that He gave great importance to property rights and
international politics has no morals and states protection of wealth. He puts great stress on hu-
must be at war at all times. man rights and on how the invaded ruler and
his ministers should be treated. He emphasiz-
He also advocated that science is a great source
es criminal justice and war justice. He showed
of power. He further believed that ‘power is
mercy towards people who were defeated in
strength and it is the strength which changes
war. In regards of punishments he believed that
the mind. This view has its parallels with Thom-
punishment is a means to an end and needs to
as Hobbes viewpoints. He is thus a realist and
prevent the commission of the crime. He strong-
stresses on ethics of responsibility. He strong-
ly said that all foreign policy and diplomacy are
ly believes that for any king to have power he
practiced as long as the self-interest of the state
should focus on creation of wealth, have sound
is served.
armies and should be able to conquer more
kingdoms to enlarge the size of his state. In a
war-like situation both Kautilya and Machia-
velli share the same reasoning. Both propagate
that a king should be closely involved in the sci-
ence of war. Kautilya has proposed three types
of war:
A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first and honest people are screwed
first.
Education is the best friend. An educated person is respected everywhere. Education beats the
beauty and the youth.
There is some self-interest behind every friendship. There is no friendship without self-inter-
ests. This is a bitter truth.
Never make friends with people who are above or below you in status. Such friendships will
never give you any happiness.
God is not present in idols. Your feelings are your god. The soul is your temple.
Once you start a working on something, don’t be afraid of failure and don’t abandon it. People
who work sincerely are the happiest.
Do not reveal what you have thought upon doing, but by wise council keep it secret being deter-
mined to carry it into execution.
According to Shankara, the one unchanging entity sented the timeless truths of Vedanta so that every man,
(Brahman) alone is real, while changing entities do woman and child would appreciate and live its high val-
not have absolute existence. The key source texts for ues. His contribution to Indian philosophy, in fact hu-
this interpretation, as for all schools of Vedānta, are manity, is so great and lasting that all the later philoso-
the Prasthanatrayi–the canonical texts consisting of phers have only tried to refute or elucidate his ideas. All
the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita and the Brahma over the world, Indian philosophy has come to be iden-
Sutras. tified with the Vedanta that Adi Shankaracharya spoke
of. He symbolizes the great rishi-culture, prevalent in In-
So great was Shankara’s thirst for the Truth that he took dia, whose foremost exponent he was. Through his life,
sannyasa when he was eight years old. By age 16, he had Shankara taught us to live by the Truth. He stands for
not only mastered but also written commentaries on the a thorough knowledge of reality through direct realisa-
Upanishads, Bhagavad-Gita and other prominent Vedic tion, which is an actual experience. Advaita philosophy
texts. These commentaries known as bhashyas stand at promotes universal unity and eclectic thinking ris-
the pinnacle of Indian philosophical writing. Shankara ing above all narrow considerations in society. Adi
traveled the entire country with his disciples. He de- Shankaracharya’s eternal message of humanity and
stroyed the false notions of religion and spirituality non-dualism assumes great relevance in the current
that people had come to believe and enlightened the world gripped in various problems including terror-
nation with his insightful analyses and logic. He pre- ism.
“When the Great Reality is not known the study Even after the Truth has been realised, there re-
of the scriptures is fruitless; when the Great Re- mains that strong, obstinate impression that one
ality is known the study of the scriptures is also is still an ego - the agent and experiencer. This
fruitless.” has to be carefully removed by living in a state
of constant identification with the supreme
Do not look at anybody in terms of friend or foe, non-dual self. Full Awakening is the eventual
brother or cousin; do not fritter away your men- ceasing of all the mental impressions of being an
tal energies in thoughts of friendship or enmi- ego.
Teachings of Ravidas represent an offshoot of the his community, namely the leather tanners. His
bhakti movement of the fifteenth century, a reli- tremendous pride in his caste identity and its as-
gious renaissance in India. Ravidas taught the fol- sociated work was meant to dismiss the abhorrent
lowing principles: notion of any work being hierarchised as inferior
or superior. He espoused sahaj bhao, or principle
• The oneness, omnipresence and omnipotence of of equanimity and forgiveness, to impress people
God. not with his high philosophy but with an earthy,
• The human soul is a particle of God. persuasive gentleness.
• The rejection of the notion that God cannot be met
by lower castes. Guru Ravidas-Famous Quotes
• To realize God, which is the goal of human life, man
should concentrate on God during all rituals of life.
“If your heart is pure, the water in your bath tub
• The only way of meeting with God (moksha) is to is holy water. You need not go anywhere to take
free the mind from duality. a holy dip”
Ravidas’ philosophy and songs were popular Surrender yourself to the lord with your heart
across class, caste and community. The Rajput prin- and soul. You will enjoy peace and pleasure.
cess Mirabai, for instance, was one of his disciples. Rav-
idas was non-combative, gentle and non-judgmental ‘You are me, and I am you-what is the difference
and had the magnanimity to take everybody with him. between us? We are like gold and the bracelet, or
In spite of his proximity to princely states, Ravidas water and the waves.’
continued to emphasise the sacredness of work ‘That family, into which a holy person is born,
or kirat. By doing so, he was inverting the prevalent whether of high or low social class, whether rich
caste hierarchy of occupation that favoured mental or poor, shall have its pure fragrance spread all
over manual labour. In his verses one finds persistent over the world.’
critique of caste hierarchy. Ravidas demonstrated,
and was recognised for, his exceptional spiritual, ‘The calf has contaminated the milk in the teats.
cognitive superiority. Yet, to drive the message The bumble bee has contaminated the flower,
and to critique the prevalent dehumanised logic and the fish the water.’
of caste, he insisted on practising the vocation of
Nanak’s religious ideas draw on both Hindu and Truth is high but higher still is truthful living is
Islamic thought, but are far more than just a syn- the percept of Nanak which gives great impor-
thesis. Nanak was an original spiritual thinker tance to individual conduct. Guru Nanak asked
and expressed his thoughts in extraordinary his followers to transform the “Five Thieves”
poetry that forms the basis of Sikh scripture. (lust, rage, greed, attachment, and ego) to lead
an ethical life.
Based on the belief in one God, Guru Nanak rec-
ognizes the equality of all human beings and
is marked by the rejection of idolatry, ritual-
ism, caste and asceticism. The ten Sikh Gurus
preached a simple message of truth, devotion to
God and universal equality.
Guru Nanak’s philosophy is not world negating
but is world reaffirming. He preached the middle
path and considered that one can make spiritual
progress even when he is a householder. This
message broke down the artificial barrier created
between spirituality and duty.
His preaching’s are based on equality of sta-
tus of all human beings which he emphasized
through sangat and pangat which means com-
munity kitchen and eating together by sitting
on the floor. The emphasis on honest living and
sharing one’s earning with others laid the foun-
dation of an egalitarian order.
I am not the born; how can there be either birth or death for me?
Death would not be called bad, O people, if one knew how to truly die.
Whatever kind of seed is sown in a field, prepared in due season, a plant of that same kind,
marked with the peculiar qualities of the seed, springs up in it.
I am neither a child, a young man, nor an ancient; nor am I of any caste.
Even Kings and emperors with heaps of wealth and vast dominion cannot compare with an ant
filled with the love of God.
The production of children, the nurture of those born, and the daily life of men, of these matters
woman is visibly the cause.
Speak only that which will bring you honor.
He who has no faith in himself can never have faith in God.
If the people use the wealth bestowed on them by God for themselves alone or for treasuring it,
it is like a corpse. But if they decide to share it with others, it becomes sacred food.
Let God’s grace be the mosque, and devotion the prayer mat. Let the Quran be the good conduct.
He who regards all men as equals is religious.
Through shallow intellect, the mind becomes shallow, and one eats the fly, along with the sweets.
Many have died; you also will die. The drum of death is being beaten. The world has fallen in
love with a dream. Only sayings of the wise will remain.
All know that the drop merges into the ocean, but few know that the ocean merges into the drop.
If you want the truth, I’ll tell you the truth: Listen to the secret sound, the real sound, which is
inside you.
Love does not grown on trees or brought in the market, but if one wants to be “LOVED” one must
first know how to give (unconditional) LOVE.
“Lift the veil that obscures the heart, and there you will find what you are looking for.
The Kazi is searching the words of the Koran, and instructing others: but if his heart be not
steeped in that love, what does it avail, though he be a teacher of men?
Kabir says, only they are pure who’ve completely cleansed their thinking.
Thiruvalluvar
The first part of the Kural, Aram (dharma), deals “The military, citizenry, resources, advisers,
with various aspects of leading a righteous do- friends and fortresses: who owns these six is a
mestic life and ascetic life (if one chooses to do lion amongst kings.”
so). According to Valluvar, dharma is a simple and
straightforward concept: Valluvar’s economic and political views are appli-
cable even in the modern context today, probably
“Righteousness is all about removing the four in the form of management training, leadership
flaws – envy, desire, anger and harsh words.” workshops, human resource management train-
ing and so on. According to Valluvar, life is worth
Removing the negativity within oneself and imbib- living and gathering wealth is essential for life:
ing the positive values in one’s life is what dhar-
ma is all about. Love, compassion, use of pleasant “Accumulate wealth; it will destroy the arrogance
words, having good conduct, forbearance and of your foes; there is no weapon sharper than that.”
honesty are the positive qualities that one should
cultivate and maintain in order to erase blemish- Gathering wealth through honest and righteous means
es from one’s mind. Aside from providing us with the is strongly emphasized by Valluvar. In fact, Valluvar is
virtues associated with living a happy domestic life, very strong in his position regarding unrighteousness
Valluvar also describes the qualities to cultivate if one or adharma:
was to choose to take up asceticism. According to Val- “One should not act in a way the wise men would
luvar, following an ascetic way of life is optional and condemn even if one’s mother is starving.”
even if one were to follow such a life style, one would
still have to eliminate the blemishes of his mind and “Amassing a lot of wealth and eating alone without
pursue the positive qualities mentioned above. sharing, is worse than the act of asking for alms”, is
worst according to Valluvar. As per Valluvar “Love is
The second part of the Kural deals with Porul, or the quintessence of life; without it, a man is but a
“wealth” as translated in English. During Vallu- frame of bones covered with skin.”
var’s time period, the type of government that was
prevalent was monarchy. Therefore, the context of
this section is to be considered as suitable for an
emperor. For example, the first couplet of this sec-
tion describes the qualities of a ruler:
“It is compassion, the most gracious of virtues, which moves the world.”
“Those who have wisdom have all; Fools with all have nothing.”
“When the rare chance comes, seize it, to do the rare deed.”
“Although an act of help done timely might be small in nature, it is truly larger than the world
itself.”
“To reprove a harm-doer, put him to shame by doing a good deed in return.”
“The wound made by hurting with fire will heal but the wound created by harsh words uttered
using out tongue leaves an indelible scar.”
“Reasoning with a drunkard is like Going under water with a torch to seek for a drowning man.”
“Just as the earth that bears the man who tills and digs it, to bear those who speak ill of them, is
a quality of the highest respect.”
Rama Krishna
He is the Guru of Swami Vivekananda, the famous
philosopher saint from India.
Paramahansa
Ramakrishna taught that the primal bond- Ramakrishna’s proclamation of jatra jiv tatra Shiv
age in human life is Kama-Kanchana (lust and (wherever there is a living being, there is Shiva)
gold). Devotees believe that Ramakrishna’s real- stemmed from his Advaitic perception of Reali-
isation of nirvikalpa samadhi also led him to an ty. This taught his disciples that kindness to living
understanding of the two sides of maya, or illusion, beings, and serving the living being is like serving
to which he referred as Avidyamaya and Vidya- Shiva Himself). Vivekananda derived his inspi-
maya. He explained that avidyamaya represents ration from this message and took initiative in
dark forces of creation (e.g. sensual desire, evil social activities like famine relief, maintenance
passions, greed, lust and cruelty), which keep peo- of orphanages, opening of training centers, ed-
ple on lower planes of consciousness. These forc- ucational institutions, dispensaries and the
es are responsible for human entrapment in the like—”Where should you go to seek for God? Are
cycle of birth and death, and they must be fought not all the poor, the miserable, the weak, God? Why
and vanquished. Vidyamaya, on the other hand, not worship them first?...Let these people be your
represents higher forces of creation (e.g. spiri- God...” declared Ramakrishna Paramahansa.
tual virtues, enlightening qualities, kindness, puri-
ty, love, and devotion), which elevate human beings
to the higher planes of consciousness. Ramakrish-
na recognised differences among religions but
realised that in spite of these differences, all
religions lead to the same ultimate goal, and
hence they are all valid and true.
The winds of grace are always blowing, but you have to raise the sail.
The world is indeed a mixture of truth and make-believe. Discard the make-believe and take
the truth.
If you must be mad, be it not for the things of the world. Be mad with the love of God.
Many good sayings are to be found in holy books, but merely reading them will not make one
religious.
God is in all men, but all men are not in God; that is why we suffer.
One must be very particular about telling the truth. Through truth one can realize God.
Work, apart from devotion or love of God, is helpless and cannot stand alone.
Pray to God that your attachment to such transitory things as wealth, name, and creature com-
forts may become less and less every day.
When the divine vision is attained, all appear equal; and there remains no distinction of good
and bad, or of high and low.
In his times morality in both individual life and the students to manifest their innate knowledge and
social life was mostly based on fear of societal power. He advocated a man-making character-build-
censure, but Swami Vivekananda gave a new the- ing education. He said that education must make the
ory of ethics and new principle of morality based students self-reliant and help them face the challeng-
on the intrinsic purity and oneness of the Atman. es of life. He was highly critical of the so-called edu-
cated who do not care for the poor and downtrodden.
Ethics according to Vivekananda was nothing but
a code of conduct that helps a man to be a good He was in complete agreement with the methods
citizen. Swamiji said we should be pure because and results of modern science. He did not discard
purity is our real nature, our true divine Self or reason in favor of faith. He recognized intuition or
Atman inspiration as a higher faculty than reason. But the
truth derived from intuition had to be explained and
Similarly, we should love and serve our neigh- systematized by reason.
bours because we are all one in the Supreme
Spirit known as Paramatma or Brahman. One Though growth of Nationalism is attributed to the
of the most significant contributions of Swami Western influence but Swami Vivekananda’s nation-
Vivekananda to the modern world is his inter- alism is deeply rooted in Indian spirituality and mo-
pretation of religion as a universal experience rality. His nationalism is based on Humanism and
of transcendent Reality, common to all humanity. Universalism, the two cardinal features of Indian
This universal conception frees religion from the spiritual culture.
hold of superstitions, dogmatism, priest craft and
intolerance. He believed that every religion offered a Swamiji believed that if our youth is determined, there
pathway to the eternal supreme – supreme freedom, can be nothing impossible for them to achieve in the
supreme knowledge, and supreme happiness. world. Hence Swamiji called upon the youth to not
only build up their mental energies, but their physical
Swami Vivekananda laid the greatest emphasis on ed- ones as well. He wanted ‘muscles of iron’ as well as
ucation for the regeneration of our motherland. Ac- ‘nerves of steel’.
cording to him, a nation is advanced in proportion as
education is spread among the masses. He said that Vivekananda propagated that the essence of Hin-
our process of education should be such that it helps duism was best expressed in Adi Shankara’s Advai-
ta Vedanta philosophy.
You have to grow from the inside out. None can teach you, none can make you spiritual. There
is no other teacher but your own soul.
All the powers in the universe are already ours. It is we who have put our hands before our eyes
and cry that it is dark.
We are what our thoughts have made us; so take care about what you think. Words are second-
ary. Thoughts live; they travel far.
The world is the great gymnasium where we come to make ourselves strong.
Condemn none: if you can stretch out a helping hand, do so. If you cannot, fold your hands, bless
your brothers, and let them go their own way.
Truth can be stated in a thousand different ways, yet each one can be true.
All differences in this world are of degree, and not of kind, because oneness is the secret of ev-
erything.
Jiddu
Krishnamurti
Jiddu Krishnamurti’s Ethical Views
The core of Krishnamurti’s teaching is contained in in his mind. The content of his consciousness is
the statement he made in 1929 when he said Truth his entire existence. The individuality is the name,
is a pathless land. the form and superficial culture he acquires from
tradition and environment. The uniqueness of
According to him, Man cannot come to it through man does not lie in the superficial but in com-
any organization, through any creed, through plete freedom from the content of his conscious-
any dogma, priest or ritual, not through any ness.
philosophical knowledge or psychological tech-
nique. He has to find it through the mirror of J. Krishnamurti attached a very high value to
relationship, through the understanding of the freedom. For him freedom is not a reaction;
contents of his own mind, through observation freedom is not choice. It is man’s pretence that
and not through intellectual analysis or intro- because he has choice he is free. Freedom is
spective dissection. pure observation without direction, without
fear of punishment and reward. Freedom is
Man has built in himself images as a fence of securi- without motive; freedom is not at the end of the
ty—religious, political, personal. These manifest as evolution of man but lies in the first step of his
symbols, ideas, beliefs. The burden of these images existence.
dominates man’s thinking, his relationships, and his
daily life. These images are the causes of our prob-
lems for they divide man from man. His perception
of life is shaped by the concepts already established
I maintain that Truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by
any religion, by any sect.
Freedom from the desire for an answer is essential to the understanding of a problem.
Tradition becomes our security, and when the mind is secure it is in decay.
When one loses the deep intimate relationship with nature, then temples, mosques and church-
es become important.
The end is the beginning of all things, Suppressed and hidden, Awaiting to be released through
the rhythm of pain and pleasure.
Your belief in God is merely an escape from your monotonous, stupid and cruel life.
We all want to be famous people, and the moment we want to be something we are no longer
free.
If you begin to understand what you are without trying to change it, then what you are under-
goes a transformation.
Raja Ram
of the Indian Renaissance” and the “First Modern
man of India” by many historians.
Mohun Roy
Raja Ram Mohun Roy’s Ethical Views
Raja Ram Mohun Roy realized that the foundational of superior services and separation of the executive
principles of every religion are the same. The ends from judiciary. He demanded equality between In-
of all religions are the same. His conception of re- dians and Europeans. He knew that the ideal of
ligion was based on monotheism and humanism. human civilization does not lie in isolation of in-
A true religion is the one that inculcates knowl- dependence, but in the brotherhood of inter-de-
edge, love of God and sympathy for the fellow pendence of individuals as well as nations
beings. It must soften the attitude and inculcate
human feelings. Raja Ram Mohun Roy -Famous Quotes
Raja Ram Mohun Roy was against the practice of
purdah, sati, restriction on women, child mar- There is only one God. None equals him. He
riage, and division of the Hindu society into var- has no end. He is present in all living beings.
ious castes.
The superstitious practices which deform the
Raja ram Mohun Roy tried to modernise the edu- Hindu religion have nothing to do with the
cation system. He established the Hindu College at pure spirit of its dictates
Calcutta in 1817, which went on to become one of
the best educational institutions in the country. Raja The Present system of Hindus is not well cal-
ram Mohun Roy believed education to be an in- culated to promote their political interests.
strument to bring about social change or reform. It is necessary that some change should take
He characterised sati as the violation of every hu- place in their religion at least for the sake of
mane and social feeling and as symptomatic of the political advantage and social comfort
moral debasement of a race. He was a champion of
civil liberties and through his writings and activities, I have now given up all worldly avocations,
he supported the movement for free press in India. and am engaged in religious culture and in
the investigation of truth.
He was a supporter of participation of people in
running an administration and equality amongst “Just consider how terrible the day of your
all. He was against concentration of power in one death will be. Others will go on speaking and
man or institution. He demanded the Indianisation you will not be able to argue back”.
Vidyasagar was a well-known writer, intellectu- he had a soft heart that melted into empathy for
al and above all a staunch supporter of humanity. other’s plight. Michael Madhusudan gave him the
Vidyasagar is credited with the role of thorough- epithet ‘Daya Sagar’ (ocean of generosity) for hi
ly remodelling medieval scholastic system pre- selfless altruism. After his death Rabindranath
vailing in Sanskrit College and bring about mod- Tagore said, “One wonders how God, in the pro-
ern insights into the education system. The first cess of producing forty million Bengalis, pro-
change that Vidyasagar made when he came back duced a man like Vidyasagar!”
to the Sanskrit College as a Professor was to include
English and Bengali as the medium of learning, be-
sides Sanskrit. He introduced courses of European Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar -
History, Philosophy and Science alongside of Vedic Famous Quotes
scriptures. He encouraged students to pursue these
subjects and take away the best from both worlds.
Education does not only mean learning, read-
He was an ardent advocate of women education. ing, writing, and arithmetic, it should provide
He rightly viewed education as the primary way comprehensive knowledge
for women to achieve emancipation from all the
societal oppression they had to face at that time. We want teachers who know both Bengali
Unlike other reformers who sought to set up al- and the English Language, and at the same
ternative societies or systems, Vidyasagar sought time are free from religious prejudices
to transform society from within.
The life without suffering is like a boat with-
Vidyasagar’s compassionate heart could not take out a sailor, in which there is no discretion of
the plight of the widows and he made it his mission itself, it also moves in a light breeze
to improve the quality of life for these helpless wom-
en. Alongside the campaign for widow remarriage, Self-restraint (moderation) gives discrimi-
he campaigned against polygamy. He faced raging nation; mediation gives concentration; peace,
opposition from orthodox society which termed the satisfaction, and charity give humanity.
concept as something heretic. He was an altruist
Rabindranath
Raj and advocated independence from Britain.
Tagore had championed the cause of freedom. The same he wanted to implement in the field of
education. With that object he had opened Shantiniketan, Sri Niketan and Brahmachari Ashram.
Accordingly, he gave free choice to students to develop their interest in any field they like. To him,
education should be after the heart of a man. He explained freedom in three-categorized ways i.e.
freedom of heart, freedom of intellect and freedom of will.
According to him the true purpose of education is Self Realization, intellectual development and
attainment of freedom.
I slept and dreamt that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold,
service was joy.
Faith is the bird that feels the light when the dawn is still dark.
You can’t cross the sea merely by standing and staring at the water.
Death is not extinguishing the light; it is only putting out the lamp because the dawn has come.
The butterfly counts not months but moments, and has time enough.
Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of man.
A mind all logic is like a knife all blade. It makes the hand bleed that uses it.
Let your life lightly dance on the edges of time like dew on the tip of a leaf.
Swami Dayanand
struggle for independence. He was given the epithet
of Maharishi and is considered as one of the Mak-
ers of Modern India
Saraswati
Swami Dayanand Saraswati’s
Ethical Views
Maharishi Dayanand was a believer in Hinduism just He advocated the concept of Swarajya, meaning
as the Vedas have outlined, devoid of any corrup- a country free of foreign influence, resplendent
tion and embellishments. He strongly advocated in the glory of fair and just participants. The Arya
the concepts of Dharma which he believed to be Samaj established a number of educational insti-
free from any partiality and as an embodiment tutions like Gurukuls, Kanya Gurukuls, D.A.V.
of truthfulness. To him Adharma was anything that Schools and Colleges for the education of both
did not hold true, was not just or fair and was op- males and females. These educational institutions
posed to the teachings of the Vedas. He launched protected the Hindu religion and society and also
the Shuddhi movement; he was not against any promoted the growth of knowledge and education
religion but against religious imperialism and on modern scientific lines.
coercive alterations of religious orientations.
He believed in reverence of human life irrespec- His life and his teachings had considerable influence
tive of anything and condoned the practice of in several important personalities like Lala Lajpat
Ahimsa or non-violence. He advised his coun- Rai, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Madam Cama,
trymen to direct their energy towards better- Ram Prasad Bismil, Mahadev Govind Ranade,
ment of mankind as a whole and not waste away Madan Lal Dhingra and Subhash Chandra Bose.
in unnecessary rituals. He revoked the practice of Shaheed Bhagat Singh was educated at the D.A.V.
idol worship and considered them a contamination School in Lahore.
introduced by the priesthood for their own benefit.
He was against other social evils like superstitions
and caste segregation. He vehemently opposed
child-marriages, polygamy, “Purdah” and the
practice of “Sati” etc. Citing the teachings of the
Vedas, he proved that women should have equal
rights with men. Inter-caste marriages and in-
ter-dining were practised by the members of
the Arya Samaj
God is the efficient cause of all true knowledge and all that is known through knowledge.
God is existent, intelligent and blissful. He is formless, omniscient, just, merciful, unborn, end-
less, unchangeable, beginning-less, unequalled, the support of all, the master of all, omnipres-
ent, immanent, un-aging, immortal, fearless, eternal and holy, and the maker of all. He alone
is worthy of being worshiped.
The Vedas are the scriptures of all true knowledge. It is the paramount duty of all Aryas to
read, teach, and recite them and to hear them being read.
All acts should be performed in accordance with Dharma that is, after deliberating what is
right and wrong.
The prime object of the Arya Samaj is to do good to the world, that is, to promote physical,
spiritual and social good of everyone.
Our conduct towards all should be guided by love, righteousness and justice.
No one should be content with promoting his/her good only; on the contrary, one should look
for his/her good in promoting the good of all.
One should regard oneself under restriction to follow the rules of society calculated to pro-
mote the wellbeing of all, while in following the rules of individual welfare all should be free.
The ideals and ideas of Mahatma Gandhi emanated He believed that “only way to see God is to see
partly from four major sources as follows: him through his creations and identify oneself
with it”. This is possible through service to hu-
a) His inner religious convictions including manity. He maintained that there is no escape
ethical principles embedded in Hindu- from social service to those in search of God.
ism, Buddhism, Jainism and Christianity This underpins his long battle against untouch-
ability and social backwardness.
b) From the exigencies of his struggle
against apartheid in South Africa and the
mass political movements during India’s
freedom struggle.
c) Influence of Tolstoy, Carlyle, and Thoreau Mahatma Gandhi’s “Ends-Means”
etc. Principle
In fact, ethics provides underpinning to Gandhian
Gandhi believed that Men should adopt only
Thought and is so deep rooted in it that it is almost
impossible to segregate the two. good means to attain noble objectives. As per
him: “No good can follow from bad deeds, even
Gandhiji believed that as human beings, men if they are well intentioned.” It is contrary to the
can never reach the perfection of divine virtues. view that bad means can be used to achieve good
Still, they should strive with all their strength ends, and what matters is the end.
to follow the virtues of truth, love, nonviolence,
tolerance, fearlessness, charity and service to
mankind. Men have to uphold the right, regardless
of the personal consequences they may face. He
urged Satyagrahis to adopt these Virtues. Gandhi
equated God with truth and designated his religion
as religion of truth. He used to say God is Truth,
which he later changed to “Truth is God”.
Gandhiji regarded Rich as trustees of wealth. He said that ultimately all property belongs to God; the
excess or superfluous wealth which the rich possess belongs to society and should be used for supporting
the poor. Wealthy people have no moral right to what is more than their proportionate share in na-
tional wealth. They simply become trustees for the disproportionate share of God’s property they
hold. They have to use it for helping the poor
An eye for eye only ends up making the whole world blind.
Happiness is when what you think, what you say, and what you do are in harmony.
The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.
Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes.
Service which is rendered without joy helps neither the servant nor the served.
If we are to teach real peace in this world, and if we are to carry on a real war against war, we
shall have to begin with the children.
The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others.
The world has enough for everyone’s need, but not enough for everyone’s greed.
Men are mortal. So are ideas. An idea needs propagation as much as a plant needs watering.
Otherwise, both will wither and die.
So long as you do not achieve social liberty, whatever freedom is provided by the law is of no
avail to you.
Law and order are the medicine of the body politic and when the body politic gets sick, medi-
cine must be administered.
What are we having this liberty for? We are having this liberty in order to reform our social
system, which is full of inequality, discrimination and other things, which conflict with our fun-
damental rights.
Caste is not a physical object like a wall of bricks or a line of barbed wire which prevents the
Hindus from co-mingling and which has, therefore, to be pulled down. Caste is a notion; it is a
state of the mind.
A great man is different from an eminent one in that he is ready to be the servant of the society.
However good a Constitution may be, if those who are implementing it are not good, it will
prove to be bad. However bad a Constitution may be, if those implementing it are good, it will
prove to be good.
My social philosophy may be said to be enshrined in three words: liberty, equality and frater-
nity. Let no one; however, say that I have borrowed by philosophy from the French Revolution.
I have not. My philosophy has roots in religion and not in political science. I have derived them
from the teachings of my Master, the Buddha.
He later focussed his attention towards serving pa- I have to be cautious, but caution also has its own
tients suffering with leprosy and spent most of his life adventure.
aiming to provide better treatment facilities as well as I don’t want to be a leader. I want to be one who
social awareness towards the disease. Baba Amte’s goes around with a little oil can and offer help
ethics is ingrained in human dignity, service, cour- when I see a breakdown.
age and social justice.
Those who do monumental work don’t need
Baba Amte launched the nationwide Bharat monuments.
Jodo Andolan in December 1985 and took up
the Bharat Jodo Yatra across India. His goal was “Happiness dies when it is not shared.”
to spread a message of peace and unity, unifying the
country against communal violence raging across the “A captain never deserts a sinking ship. To save a
length and breadth. sinking country, brave sailors must emerge!”
Jotiba Phule
Jotiba Phule’s Ethical Views
After reading Thomas Paine’s famous book ‘The Jotiba Phule -Famous Quotes
Rights of Man’, Jyotirao was greatly influenced
by his ideas. He believed that enlightenment of
the women and lower caste people was the only
“Lack of education lead to lack of wisdom, /
solution to combat the social evils.
Which leads to lack of morals, / Which leads
Jyotiba’s quest for providing women and girls to lack of progress, / Which leads to lack of
with right to education was supported by his money, / Which leads to the oppression of
wife Savitribai Phule. One of the few literate wom- the lower classes, / See what state of the so-
en of the time, Savitribai was taught to read and ciety one lack of education can cause!”
write by her husband Jyotirao. He was a believer
True education signifies empowering oth-
in gender equality and he exemplified his be-
ers and leaving the world a little better than
liefs by involving his wife in all his social reform
activities. the one we found.
“ It is essential that we think about our national identity, without which independence has no
meaning”
“Independence can be meaningful only if it becomes an instrument of expression of our culture”
“The fundamental characteristic of Bhartiya culture is that it looks upon life as an integrated
whole”
“Strength lies not in unrestrained behaviour but in well regulated action”
“Education is an investment. An educated individual will indeed serve society”
“Religion means a creed or a sect and it does not mean dharma”
Pt. Madan Mohan Malaviya popularized the Madan Mohan Malaviya was against caste dis-
term ‘Satyamev Jayate’. However, the phrase crimination. He worked immensely for Hin-
originally belongs to the Mundaka Upani- du-Muslim unity. He is known to have given fa-
shad. The term now is the national motto of In- mous speeches on communal harmony.
dia.
The one thing for which he was noted was not
He was given the title of ‘Mahamana’ by his intellectual gifts great as they were and his
Rabindranath Tagore and the second Presi- political fervor which knew no bounds but char-
dent of India; Dr. S. Radhakrishnan gave him acter pure, high and solid, and sense of devotion
the status of a ‘Karmayogi’. and sacrifice in the service of his motherland
If you admit internal purity of the human soul, you or your religion can never get impure or
defiled in any way by touch or association with any man.
I implore all Hindus and Mussalmans, Sikhs, Christians and Parsees and all other countrymen
to sink all communal differences and to establish political unity among all sections of the peo-
ple.
Let righteousness and Dharma prevail, and all communities and societies progress. Let our be-
loved Motherland regain its lost glory, and the sons of Bharat be victorious.
We believe religion to be the surest foundation of character and the truest source of human
happiness. We believe patriotism to be a powerful elevating influence which inspires men to
high-minded unselfish action.
In the midst of much darkness, I see a clear vision that the clouds which have long been hanging
over our heads are lifting. Let every son and daughter do his or her duty to expedite the advent
of dawn of the day of freedom and happiness. The truth is on our side. Justice is with us. God
will help us. We are sure to win. Vande Mataram.
Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam’s Ethical Views Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam’s–Vision 2020
Dr A.P.J Abdul Kalam is a very good example of A Nation where the rural and urban divide has re-
an ethical leader. He had a noble mind, strong- duced to a thin line.
ly believed in simplicity and has encouraged A Nation where there is an equitable distribution
scores of Indians and people all of the world and adequate access to energy and quality water.
through his dedication, empathy and integrity. A Nation where agriculture, industry and service
He was a visionary who had immense faith in sector work together in symphony.
the ability of the human mind.
A Nation where education with value system is not
During his Presidency, he maintained his close con- denied to any meritorious candidates because of
nections with science and technology in the quest societal or economic discrimination.
to transform India into a developed country. He A Nation which is the best destination for the most
upheld the virtues of a citizen and, as a scien- talented scholars, scientists, and investors.
tist, always combined ethics with science. While A Nation where the best health care is available to
occupying the highest position in the country, Mr. all.
Kalam was not swayed by power but used love A Nation where the governance is responsive,
and peace as tools to be one among the masses. transparent and corruption free.
Some of the lessons we learned from his leader- A Nation where poverty has been totally eradicated,
ship is that everything is possible, leaders must illiteracy removed and crimes against women and
humble themselves and that leaders are the fire children are absent and none in the society feels
of their followers’ mind. He inspired millions alienated.
of youth to dream and believe in themselves. A Nation that is prosperous, healthy, secure, peace-
He was a rational thinker who emphasised on ful and happy and continues with a sustainable
curiosity of mind. For him integrity was an in- growth path.
separable trait of, that helps in building a strong A Nation that is one of the best places to live in and
ethically upright character. is proud of its leadership.