RESEARCH PROPOSAL GUIDELINES

POINTS TO CONSIDER

I. RESEARCH TITLE

1. Research Title must be reflective of its problem

2. It must answer the following questions:
2.1 What question will answer THE FOLLOWING?
2.1.1 What are you trying to investigate?
2.1.2 What are you trying to find out, determine or discover?
2.2 Who question will answer who are the respondents or subjects of the
study.
2.3 Where questions will indicate the research locale, setting or the place
where the research study is conducted.

II. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

1. The proponent should describe the existing and prevailing problem situation based on his/
her experience. This scope may be global, national, regional and local.
2. The proponent should give strong justification for selecting such research problem in his/
her capacity as a researcher. Being a part of the organization or systems and the desire
and concern to improve the systems.
3. The researcher should link and relate the background of the study to the proposed
research problem.

III. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

1. Related literature includes research findings, published or unpublished theories and

principles formulated by experts or authorities in some field or discipline; and ideas or
opinions of experts contained in books, pamphlets, magazine and periodicals.
2. It should be written in terms of the purpose of the study.
3. It should give more weight to studies considered more authorize as evaluated and should
give reference to primary rather than secondary sources.
4. It should be organized thematically to conform with the specific problems.
5. It should be synthesized such that evidence from all the studies reviewed would get an
overall understanding of the state knowledge in the problem area.

IV. CONCEPTUAL/ THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY

Conceptual Framework

1.1 The conceptual framework is the schematic diagram which shows the variables included
in the study.
1.2 Arrows or line should be properly placed and connected between boxes to show the
relationship between the independent and dependent variables.
 1.3 All the independent and dependent variables should be clearly discussed and explained
how these influence the results of the study.

Theoretical Framework

2.1 The theoretical framework consists of theories, principles, generalizations and research
findings which are closely related to the present study under investigation. It is in this
framework where the present problem understudy evolved.

2.2 Authors of these theories and principles should be cited. As much as possible research
findings and theories should be correct.

V. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

1. There should be an introductory statement which reflects the main problem of the study.
2. Sub- problem should be stated in such a way that it is not answerable by either yes, no,
when and where.
3. Sub- problems should include all the independent and moderate variables which are
reflected in the conceptual framework.
4. Sub-problems should be arranged in logical order and extensive in coverage and must be
mutually exclusive in its dimensions.
5. If the researcher is quantitative avoid the “how questions”.

VI. ASSUMPTIONS

1. Assumption refers to a proposition of some occurrences or considerations that may be

considered in eliminating the area of the study.
2. It is a proposition which a researcher asserts based on his own intuition, experience, and
observations but which is not scientifically proven. It is adopted as a premise to the
solution of the problem envisioned in his study.

VII. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

1. This section describes the contributions of the study to knowledge. This could be in the
form of new knowledge in the field, a check on the major findings of other studies, a
check on the validity of findings in a different population, a check on trends over time
and a check on the other findings using different methodology.
2. It discusses the importance of the study to the society, the country, the government, the
community, the institution, the agency concerned, the curriculum planner and developers
and to the researcher.
3. It expounds on the study’s probable impact to education, science, technology, on-going
researcher and etc.

VIII. DEFINITION OF TERMS

 1. The terms which connote different meaning from the conceptual or dictionary definitions
should be operationally defined to facilitate the full understanding of the text by the
readers.
2. The terms to be operationally defined are those used throughout the study and may be a
word or a phrase, usually taken from the title, the statement of the problem or hypothesis.
3. The terms should be arranged in alphabetical order and the definitions should be stated in
complete sentences.

IX. SCOPE AND LIMITATION

1. This section explains the nature, coverage, and time frame of the study.
2. It presents in brief the subject area of investigation, the place, the time period, or school
year covered.
3. It discusses the variables included in the study and the exclusion of other variables which
are expected to be included.
4. It indicates the extent of capability of results arising from the sampling population.

X. METHODOLOGY

This discusses the research locale, research design, population sampling or respondents
of the study, research instrument, and the statistical of data.

1.1 Research Locale

1.1 This discusses the place or setting of the study. It describes in brief the
place where the study is conducted. Only important features which have
the bearing on the present study are included.
1.2 Shows the target population.

1.2 Research Design

1.2.1 This describes the research mode whether it is true experimental or

quasi- experimental design, descriptive or survey research, historical
research, qualitative research, ethnographic.

1.3 Population Sampling or Respondents of The Study

1.3.1 This describes the target population and the sample frame.
1.3.2 It specifies the sampling technique used and how the sample size is
determined.

1.4 Research Instrument

1.4.1 This explains the specific type of research instrument used such as
questionnaire, checklists, structured interview, teacher- made test,
 standardized instrument which are adopted or borrowed with
permission from the author or from other sources.
1.4.2 The parts of the instruments should be explained and what bits of
information are derived.
1.4.3 The establishment of validity and reliability should be explained and
only experts should be chosen to validate such instrument. Specific
and appropriate statistical test used should be given and the computed
values derived. Interpretation should be included in the discussion.

1.5 Statistical Treatment of Data

1.5.1 Explain how each statistical test is used in the treatment of data.
1.5.2 If the research instrument included options which are scaled, explain
how each scale is given the weight, its interval and class limits.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. This includes all materials used and reviewed by the researcher, such as books,
magazines, periodicals, journals, thesis or dissertation (published or unpublished).
Monographs, speeches and modules, web page or internet, etc.
2. In the choice of bibliographic materials, the following should be considered.
2.1 Relatedness to the researcher problem.
2.2 Inclusion of recent publications (materials published in the 50’s up to 70’s
should not be included).