Cap 10
Cap 10
Cap 10
CAP 10
EXAMINERS
INDEX
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATIONS
Bahrain CAA Publication Revisions Highlight Sheet
CAP: 10 TPM: __
The following pages have been revised to Revision 01 dated 24 May 2022.
Index – 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, Deletion of FEs, TRE(E), TRE(H), CREs, IREs, FIEs,
6. i
4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.3.3, 4.3.5 SEPs and retaining TRE(A) & SFEs.
7. Index – 5.3, 5.4 i-ii Deletion of FE, CRE, IRE, FIE, SEP.
Index - 8.2.4 to 8.2.8 & 8.3.3 Deletion of FEs, TRE(E), TRE(H), CREs, IREs, FIEs,
11. ii
to 8.3.5 SEPs and retaining TRE(A) & SFEs.
12. Index – 9.4.2 iii Title addition to match the content revision.
13. Index – 9.9.2 iii Title addition to match the content revision.
1-3-1 to
15. 3.1 / 3.1.1 / 3.1.2 / 3.2 Revised to standardize the procedure.
1-3-2
20. 5.1 1-5-1 Deletion of FE, CRE, IRE, FIE training requirements.
Part 2 – Module 1
Part 2 – Module 2
2-2-1 to
43. 2.2 / 2.3 Deletion of SE roles.
2-2-2
2-3-1 &
46. Module 3 & 4 Deletion of non-standard test standards.
2-4-1
CAP 10
EXAMINERS
PART 1 POLICY
INDEX
CHAPTER 1 DEFINITIONS
INDEX
Note: Part 2 is based directly on the EASA Flight Examiner Manual and is intended to be the
main reference material for the training for pilots only.
Module 9 – Type and Class Skill Test and Proficiency Checks (Aeroplane & Helicopter) . 2-9-1
Module 11 – Instructor Skill Test and Proficiency Checks (Aeroplane and Helicopter) ... 2-11-1
CAP 10
PART 1
CHAPTER 1
DEFINITIONS
Aircraft Operating Manual – a Pilot’s Operating Manual, a Pilot’s Operating Handbook, a Flight
Crew Operating Manual or a manual established by the Air Operator for the use and guidance of crew
members in the operations of its aircraft.
Applicant – a person nominated as a candidate for Designated Examiner approval and authorisation by
the BCAA.
Base Month – the month in which the Skill Test for the issue or renewal of a type rating is
successfully completed (on the base aircraft type, for pilots operating on more than one type or
variant). Where an aircraft test/check is required, it is established at the completion of the aircraft
test/check. In the context of the Designated Examiner program, it means the month in which the
Examiner was initially authorised by the BCAA.
Command Upgrade Training – the training required for crew members who have qualified and
served as second in command on a particular aircraft type, before they serve as pilot in command,
on that aircraft.
Company Executive – a company Post Holder, Vice President Operations or Chief Executive.
Conducting – to take an active role in the test or check, i.e. to carry out the briefing, to control the
various sequences in the check, to assess applicant(s) performance, to conduct the debriefing, and
complete the required documents, including the certification of applicant(s)
licence(s).
Conversion Training – the training required for crew members when changing to an aircraft for
which a new type or class rating is required.
Differences Training – the training required for crew members and dispatchers operate another
variant of an aircraft type currently operated, or another type of the same class currently operated;
or when a change of equipment and/or procedures, on types or variants currently operated, requires
additional knowledge and training on an appropriate training device or aircraft.
Employ – to use the services of someone (does not necessarily imply financial remuneration).
Examiner – either a BCAA Inspector or designated Check Airman, TRE or SFE Examiner.
Examiner Authorisation Acceptance Test – the final stage in the training required for authorisation
as a designated examiner, consisting of a Skill Test or Proficiency Check conducted by the examiner
applicant, under the observation of a BCAA Inspector.
Examiner Monitor Check - an annual requirement to maintain the validity of a designated examiner
authorisation, consisting of a Skill Test or Proficiency Check conducted under the observation of a
BCAA Inspector.
Familiarisation Training - the training required for crew members and dispatchers to operate
another variant of an aircraft type currently operated, or another type of the same class currently
operated; or when a change of equipment and/or procedures, on types or variants currently operated,
requires acquisition of additional knowledge.
Management System.
Line Operational Evaluation (LOE) - A gate-to-gate line-oriented scenario designed for the
evaluation of both technical and CRM skills of a complete cockpit crew, conducted in a flight
simulator, using a normal crew complement.
LPC - means Licence Proficiency Check and includes the skill test for the initial type rating and
revalidation.
Monitoring - means to take a passive role during the check. Monitoring will be done by BCAA
Inspectors, where the Inspector's interest will be in the manner in which the Designated Examiner
conducts the test, assesses the results and processes the necessary documentation.
Normal Crew Complement - a complete cockpit crew, consisting of a qualified Captain and First
Officer (candidates for a type rating Skill Test are considered qualified for this purpose).
Operator - a commercial airline operating under an AOC issued by BCAA, and in accordance with
the Civil Aviation Law and ANTRs.
PIC - Pilot-in-command.
Practical Test - that portion of a flight crew test administered in a simulator or in an aircraft.
Note: These are required every 12 months (See also OPC & LPC)
P1 - Pilot-in-command
P2 – Co-pilot
Renewal – the administrative action taken by an examiner and the BCAA after a rating has expired,
whereby the BCAA renews the privileges of a rating or authorisation for a further period, consequent
upon the fulfilment of specified renewal requirements.
Revalidation – the administrative action taken by an examiner within the period of validity of a rating
that allows the holder to continue to exercise the privileges of a rating or authorisation for a further
period, consequent upon the fulfilment of specified revalidation requirements.
SIC - second-in-command.
Skill Test – a demonstration of knowledge and skill required for the issue or renewal of a licence or
rating.
SOP - BCAA approved Standard Operating Procedures established by an Air Operator, which enable
the crew members to operate the aircraft within the limitations specified in the Airplane Flight
Manual.
CHAPTER 2
2.1 INTRODUCTION
This publication contains the standards, policies, procedures and guidelines concerning the
Designated Examiner programme for use by both BCAA Inspectors and Designated
Examiners, in accordance with the requirements of ANTR-FCL 1, Subpart I.
It is published by the Civil Aviation Affairs under the authority of Bahrain Civil Aviation Law
(No. 6 of 1995)
For the purposes of this manual, a Designated Examiner is an Operator employee, authorized
to conduct Pilot Type Rating Skill Tests, Pilot Proficiency Checks, and Pilot Line Checks on
behalf of the BCAA. Although they are employed by an Operator, Designated Examiners are
first and foremost acting as delegates of the BCAA when performing their duties as an
Examiner.
There are 2 Parts to this publication. Part 1 is the main policy document and Part 2 is an
Examiners reference document (based on the EASA Flight Examiners Manual), which
amplifies Part 1.
Note: The information given in this publication may not be applicable to an operator with
a BCAA-approved alternate training programme under ANTR-OPS 1.978 and the
approved alternate training programme will remain the defining document.
(a) Type rating examiner – aeroplane (TRE(A) and helicopter (TRE(H) and
2.3.1 General
The Designated Examiner programme has been instituted to allow Air Operators to develop
and maintain a programme of tests and checks independent of the availability of BCAA
Inspectors. Designated Examiners must, however, be constantly aware that they perform their
checking duties as delegates of the BCAA.
Written authorisation by the BCAA must be received prior to the applicant conducting the
duties of an Examiner.
Examiners need not have a residence within the designating geographical area of jurisdiction;
however, an examiner must be able to provide examiner service in the areain order to be
considered for approval.
Note: It is general BCAA policy that management pilots should not be permitted to be
Examiners.
Provided that they meet the qualification and experience requirements set out in this Subpart
for each role undertaken, examiners are not confined to a single role as a Check Airman,
TRE or SFE.
An Inspector may conduct any of the tests and checks referred to in this manual. An Inspector
may monitor any approved Designated Examiner conducting any test or check, at any time.
Examiners, while conducting or observing a flight check from the observer’s seat, are
cautioned not to move throttles, controls, pull circuit breakers or otherwise do anything that
would cause confusion or distraction to the flight crew.
Conflict of Interest is defined as any relationship that might influence a Designated Examiner
to act, either knowingly or unknowingly, in a manner that does not hold the safety of the flying
public as the primary and highest priority.
All Designated Examiners are held to be in a “perceived” conflict of interest, in that they are
simultaneously employees of the company and delegates of the BCAA when performing their
checking duties. To avoid a “real” conflict of interest, it is imperative that Designated
Examiners strictly adhere to the policy and guidelines contained in this manual.
The final authority, for deciding whether there is any conflict of interest that might affect the
Designated Examiner’s ability to conduct tests and checks in an impartial manner, rests with
the BCAA It must be emphasized that any effort by an Operator to influence or obstruct a
Designated Examiner, in any way, in the course of fulfilling his obligations to the BCAA, will
result in the forfeiture of the Operator’s Designated Examiner programme. The validity of any
checks performed by the affected Designated Examiner will also be revoked.
Should any Designated Examiner come into a situation of conflict of interest, a full report of
the circumstances shall be immediately submitted to the BCAA for review.
CHAPTER 3
The Operator shall forward a Designated Examiner application form (ALD/LIC/F132) for
each nominee to the BCAA.
The Operator’s Training Manager shall complete and sign the application form
(ALD/LIC/F132) in accordance with the instructions printed thereon. A resume of the
nominee’s background, qualifications and experience is required, and must include a summary
of previous checking, training or supervisory experience.
A nominee shall also declare, on his/her resume, any interest in the company, or other
conditions that could result in a conflict of interest. Interest in a company will not
automatically disqualify a nominee from receiving Designated Examiner authority. The
BCAA will assess every case, with consideration given to all circumstances involved.
When the Training Manager is the nominee, the form must be signed by the Accountable
Manager.
The completed nomination form, with required supporting documentation, shall be submitted
to the BCAA office holding responsibility for the Operator.
The BCAA is solely responsible for the acceptance and authorisation of all Designated
Examiners.
Upon receipt of a completed ALD/LIC/F132 form and supporting documents, BCAA will
review the form and documents to determine whether the nominee meets the minimum
qualifications for the examiner authority requested and also will determine whether an
additional examiner with that type of authority is needed.
a) If the minimum qualifications are met and there is need for an additional examiner with
the requested authority, BCAA formally notifies the sponsoring organisation/nominee
by letter that the application and authorisation process will continue.
b) If the minimum qualifications are not met but there is need for an additional examiner
with the requested authority, BCAA formally notifies the sponsoring
organisation/nominee by letter of the deficiency and how it may be corrected. The
CAP 10 Rev. 01 1-3-1 24 May 2022
CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATIONS
application and authorisation process for that nominee will not continue until
documentation of the correction is provided to BCAA.
c) If the minimum qualifications are met but BCAA determines there is no need for an
additional examiner with the requested authority, BCAA formally notifies the
sponsoring organisation/nominee by letter of that determination and that the application
and authorisation process will not continue.
If BCAA notifies the sponsoring organisation/nominee that the application and authorisation
process will continue, the nominee/applicant will proceed to completing a pre-authorisation
training and testing process further described in Chapters 5 and 7 and Modules 1 and 2 of this
CAP.
a) The nominee/applicant will be scheduled for BCAA-provided Examiner Training and also
must complete requires observation and supervised conduct of a relevant skill test/proficiency
check as part of the training process.
b) Upon successful completion of the Examiner Training, the nominee/applicant will undergo
and must pass an Examiner Authorisation Acceptance Test (EAAT) observed by a BCAA
inspector.
If the Pre-Authorisation Training and Testing process is successfully completed, the BCAA
Operations Inspector who conducts the EAAT must complete and sign a Designated Examiner
Monitoring Report form (ALD/LIC/082) and take other actions as described in Chapter 7 of
this document.
The BCAA Operations Inspector concerned shall then complete and sign the Verification and
Recommendation block on the application form, and then issue the Designated Examiner
Authority, ensuring that a copy is retained in the appropriate file.
3.3 ADDITION OF FURTHER TYPE/AUTHORITY
BCAA will consider retaining the designation of Examiners who change aircraft types, after
an acceptable familiarization period on the new type.
The BCAA shall verify the applicant’squalifications, including the applicant’s demonstrated
ability to conduct Skill Tests and Proficiency Checks on each aircraft type requested.
When the applicant has met all requirements, a revised Designated Examiner Authority shall
be issued.
The revised authority shall be annotated “This authority supersedes and cancels the approval
dated (previous approval date).”
CHAPTER 4
(a) Examiners shall hold a licence and rating at least equal to the licence or rating for
which they are authorised to conduct skill tests or proficiency checks and, unless
specified otherwise, the privilege to instruct for this licence or rating.
(c) Where no qualified examiner is available and, at the discretion of the BCAA,
examiners/inspectors may be authorised without meeting the relevant
instructor/type/class rating requirements.
(d) The applicant for an examiner authorisation shall have conducted at least one skill
test/check in the role of an examiner for which authorisation is sought, including
briefing, conduct of the skill test/check, assessment of the applicant to whom the
skill test/check is given, de-briefing and recording/documentation.
Note: This test is referred to as the Examiner Authorisation Acceptance Test (EAAT) and will
be conducted by a BCAA Inspector.
(a) Hold a valid ATPL which would allow the applicant to act as pilot in command on the
same type of aircraft as requested in the application for checking privileges;
(c) Demonstrate flying proficiency on the type for which the nominee seeks examining
authority, if the nominee does not hold a current Proficiency Check on type;
(d) Have been employed as Pilot-in-Command in the same type of operation for which
examining authority is sought;
(f) Demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the contents and interpretation of the BCAA
ANTRs;
(h) Demonstrate his knowledge and ability to conduct Skill Test(s), Proficiency Check(s)
and Line Check(s), as appropriate, on the applicable aircraft type (and/or simulator)
for which the Designated Examiner has been nominated; and
(i) Have successfully completed the training requirements for authorisation as a TRI, as
specified in Parts 1 and 2 of ANTR AMC FCL 1.365 or the equivalent training
requirements acceptable to the BCAA, and specified in the Operator’s Training
Manual (OMD).
Note: If the nominee is not currently authorised as an SFI or TRI by the BCAA, then he/she
shall undergo such training as may be required for such an authorisation, prior to
commencement of the TRE training course. In the case of Examiners whose authority
shall be limited to simulator checks only, then only the SFI training requirements need
to be completed.
(a) Hold a valid ATPL which would allow the applicant to act as pilot in command on the
same type of aircraft as requested in the application for checking privileges;
(c) Demonstrate flying proficiency on the type for which the nominee seeks examining
authority, if the nominee does not hold a current Proficiency Check on type;
(d) Have been employed as Pilot-in-Command in the same type of operation for which
examining authority is sought;
(f) Demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the contents and interpretation of the BCAA
ANTRs;
(h) Demonstrate his knowledge and ability to conduct Skill Test(s), Proficiency Check(s)
and Line Check(s), as appropriate, on the applicable aircraft type (and/or simulator)
for which the Designated Examiner has been nominated; and
(i) Have successfully completed the training requirements for authorisation as a TRI, as
specified in Parts 1 and 2 of ANTR AMC FCL 1.365 or the equivalent training
requirements acceptable to the BCAA, and specified in the Operator’s Training
Manual (OMD).
Note: If the nominee is not currently authorised as an SFI or TRI by the BCAA, then he shall
undergo such training as may be required for such an authorisation, prior to
CAP 10 Rev. 01 1-4-2 24 May 2022
CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATIONS
commencement of the SFE training course. In the case of Examiners whose authority
shall be limited to simulator checks only, then only the SFI training requirements need
to be completed.
(1) have not less than 1500 hours as pilot on multi-pilot helicopters of which at
least 500 hours shall be as pilot in command; and
(3) before the privileges are extended from single-pilot multi-engine helicopter
to multi-pilot multi-engine privileges on the same type, the holder shall meet
the requirements of ANTR-FCL 2.250 and have at least 100 hours in multi-
pilot helicopters on this type. An applicant for the first multi-pilot multi- engine
TRE authority shall meet the experience requirements of ANTR-FCL
2.439(a)(1) except that the 1500 hours multi-pilot helicopter may be
considered to have been met if they have the 500 hours pilot-in-command on
the multi-pilot helicopter of the same type.
(2) hold a professional helicopter pilot licence, and when applicable, a valid
IR(H); and
(1) has completed not less than 750 hours as a pilot of helicopters of which at
least 500 hours shall be as pilot-in-command; and
(3) hold either a valid FI(H) or TRI(H) rating for the applicable helicopter.
(d) Demonstrate flying proficiency on the type for which the nominee seeks examining
authority, if the nominee does not hold a current Proficiency Check on type;
(e) Have been employed as Pilot-in-Command in the same type of operation for which
examining authority is sought;
(i) Demonstrate his knowledge and ability to conduct Skill Test(s), Proficiency Check(s)
and Line Check(s), as appropriate, on the applicable aircraft type (and/or simulator)
for which the Designated Examiner has been nominated; and
(j) Have successfully completed the training requirements for authorisation as a TRI, as
specified in Parts 1 and 2 of ANTR AMC FCL 2.365 or the equivalent training
requirements acceptable to the BCAA, and specified in the Operator’s Training
Manual (OMD).
Note: If the nominee is not currently authorised as an SFI or TRI by the BCAA, then he/she
shall undergo such training as may be required for such an authorisation, prior to
commencement of the TRE training course. In the case of Examiners whose authority
shall be limited to simulator checks only, then only the SFI training requirements need
to be completed.
(c) Has not less than 1000 hours of flight time as a pilot of multi-pilot helicopters;, and
(e) Demonstrate flying proficiency on the type for which the nominee seeks examining
authority, if the nominee does not hold a current Proficiency Check on type;
(f) Have been employed as Pilot-in-Command in the same type of operation for which
examining authority is sought;
(h) Demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the contents and interpretation of the BCAA
ANTRs;
(j) Demonstrate his knowledge and ability to conduct Skill Test(s), Proficiency Check(s)
and Line Check(s), as appropriate, on the applicable aircraft type (and/or simulator)
CAP 10 Rev. 01 1-4-4 24 May 2022
CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATIONS
for which the Designated Examiner has been nominated; and
(j) Have successfully completed the training requirements for authorisation as a TRI, as
specified in Parts 1 and 2 of ANTR AMC FCL 2.365 or the equivalent training
requirements acceptable to the BCAA, and specified in the Operator’s Training
Manual (OMD).
Note: If the nominee is not currently authorised as an SFI or TRI by the BCAA, then he shall
undergo such training as may be required for such an authorisation, prior to
commencement of the SFE training course. In the case of Examiners whose authority
shall be limited to simulator checks only, then only the SFI training requirements need
to be completed.
CHAPTER 5
5.1 GENERAL
All Examiners must be suitably trained, qualified and experienced for their role on the relevant
type/class of aircraft. It is important, however, that in every instance, the Examiner should, by
background and experience, have the professional respect of the aviation community.
Pilots shall undergo the following training in order to be authorised as a Synthetic Flight
Examiner (SFE):
(1) The procedures and techniques associated with the conduct of Type Rating
Skill Tests andProficiency Checks;
(2) The techniques and standards used in the assessment and evaluation of
candidate performance;
(5) The contents and interpretation of all applicable manuals and publications.
(b) The observation of at least one Skill Test or Proficiency Check being conducted in an
approved simulator;
(c) The conduct of at least two Skill Tests and/or Proficiency Checks in an approved
simulator under the supervision of a Type Rating Examiner or Synthetic Flight
Examiner. The nominee shall carry out the briefing, conduct the check and subsequent
debrief, and then complete all necessary paperwork, except for any signatures and
licence entries, which shall be made by the TRE/SFE conducting the training; and
(d) Undergo a BCAA Examiner Authorisation Acceptance Test, during which a BCAA
Inspector will observe the nominee/applicant conducting a Skill Test or Proficiency
Check on a candidate (or candidates) in an approved simulator. Subject to the
satisfactory demonstration of the nominee’s abilityto perform the required duties, the
observing Inspector shall recommend the authorisation of the applicant as an SFE.
Note: During the EAAT, the nominee shall carry out all the briefing & debriefing and
complete the necessary paper work for the Skill Test or Proficiency Check except for
any signature, which shall be completed by the monitoring Examiner.
In addition to the training requirements for a SFE, as specified in 5.2 above, pilots shall
undergo the following training in order to obtain authorisation as a Type Rating Examiner
(TRE):
(a) Appropriate simulator training, covering the TRE’s role during circuit training, and
the exercises required in the aircraft to complete a type-rating Skill Test;
(b) Observation of the conduct of aircraft type rating assessment; and
(c) If previously a SFE, conduct aircraft type rat ing assessm ent for one trainee,
under the supervision of a TRE, and under observation by BCAA (this observation
requirement may be waived with the written approval of the BCAA).
(d) A TRE, who is applying to be authorised for aircraft without simulator support, shall
be required to conduct at least two Skill Tests and/or Proficiency Checks in the aircraft,
under the supervision of a TRE and under observation by BCAA. (The BCAA
observation requirement may be waived with the written approval of the BCAA.)
Note: The nominee shall carry out all the briefing & debriefing and complete the necessary
paper work except for any signature, which shall be completed by the supervising
Examiner or observing Inspector.
CHAPTER 6
6.1 GENERAL
An Examiner authorisation is valid for a period of three calendar years, not including the
month of issue (base month).
Examiners are re-authorised at the discretion of the BCAA, and in accordance with
Appendix 1 to ANTR-FCL 1.425 (aeroplane) or Appendix 1 to ANTR-FCL 2.425
(helicopter).
6.1.2 Re-authorisation
To be re-authorised, the examiner shall have conducted at least two skill tests or proficiency
checks in every yearly period within the three year authorisation period. One of the skill
tests or proficiency checks given by the examiner annually within the validity period of the
authorisation shall have been observed by an inspector of the BCAA as an Annual DE Monitor
Check.
If the Operator can show that it is impractical to arrange a BCAA monitor/check to fulfill the
requirements above, prior to the expiry date, an extension may be granted by the BCAA on a
specific case basis. Maximum extension may not exceed 30 days, from the date the BCAA
monitor was due.
An Examiner authorisation will cease to be valid whenever any of the following conditions
apply:
(a) More than 12 calendar months have elapsed since completion of any required
Refresher Course or Workshop. Such a workshop shall cover assessment standards
and practices, licensing requirements and current regulations; or
(b) More than 12 calendar months have elapsed since the Examiner has undergone either
the Examiner Authorisation Acceptance Test or an Annual DE Monitor Check by a
BCAA Inspector whilst conducting a Skill Test or Proficiency Check; or
(c) For a TRE/SFE, more than 12 calendar months have elapsed since the TRE/SFE has
undergone a Proficiency Check conducted by a BCAA Inspector, or an Examiner
specifically authorised for this purpose; or
(d) When less than 2 Skill Tests or Proficiency Checks sessions have been conducted by
the Examiner within a 12 calendar month period; or
(g) The required medical category invalidates his/her licence (does not apply in case of an
authorisation issued for and restricted to flight simulator checks); or
(i) For base training privileges, more than 12 calendar months have elapsed since a TRE
has occupied either pilot’s seat during circuit training (in this case, SFE authorisation
shall remain valid provided all other validity requirements continue to be satisfied).
(a) Conduct of a Skill Test or Proficiency Check in an approved simulator, under the
observation of a BCAA Inspector (Annual DE Monitor Check); and
Provided all necessary licences and ratings (including TRI authorisation) are valid, an
Examiner authorisation that has expired may be renewed by the following:
(a) If less than 3 calendar years have elapsed since the Examiner has been monitored and
checked by a BCAA Inspector, then the authorisation may be renewed by undergoing
a DE Monitor Check by a BCAA Inspector and aProficiency Check, conducted by a
BCAA Inspector or an Examiner specifically authorised for this purpose.
(b) If 3 calendar years or more have elapsed since the Examiner has been monitored and
checked by a BCAA Inspector, then the authorisation may be renewed by undergoing
the complete initial qualification training process.
(c) If more than 12 calendar months have elapsed since an Examiner has occupied either
pilot’s seat during circuit training, then the authorisation may be renewed by
undergoing appropriate refresher training in the aircraft or simulator.
6.3.1 Policy
Designated Examiner privileges may be withdrawn by the BCAA, in part or in whole, for due
cause. In these cases, the BCAA will issue a written notification of withdrawal of examiner
privileges to the Designated Examiner concerned, and also inform the applicable Operator(s).
Where there is an immediate threat to safety, this privilege will be withdrawn immediately.
Except where there is an immediate threat to safety, the BCAA, prior to making a final
decision in the matter of withdrawal of a Designated Examiner’s authority, shall ensure:
6.3.2 Causes
The BCAA may withdraw a Designated Examiner’s authority if evidence shows that an
Examiner has:
(a) At any time, acted in a manner which is in contravention of the guidelines contained
in this publication;
(b) Placed a personal interest, or the interest of the company, ahead of the interest of the
BCAA and the travelling public;
(d) Failed to follow the applicable instructions to maintain the required standards, or to
follow proper procedures;
(e) Fraudulently misused Designated Examiner authority, or acted in any other way that
would discredit the BCAA;
(g) During the course of a Proficiency Check, Skill Test or Annual DE Monitor Check,
failed to meet the required BCAA Standards. The Designated Examiner will be
informed verbally, immediately upon completion of the Proficiency Check or Skill
Test, or the Inspector may stop the check at the time an overall failure is awarded;
CHAPTER 7
7.1 GENERAL
The operator has a responsible for the quality, legality and conduct of the examiner. The
BCAA will conduct oversight on examiners and, unless specifically exempted by the BCAA,
a BCAA Flight Operations Inspector must conduct the following test and monitoring checks
regarding Examiners
Note 2: BCAA reserves the right to conduct a sample of any hecks conducted by the
Operator, in order to further validate the Operator’s approved training
programmes.
The BCAA shall monitor the standards of all Designated Examiners by:
(a) Monitoring each DE every 12 months while he/she conducts a Skill Test or
Proficiency Check ; this check shall be referred to as the Annual DE Monitor Check.
The period of validity of this check requirement shall be 12 calendar months, in
addition to the remainder of the month of the check;
(2) His/her Skill Tests and Proficiency Checks (as applicable) cover the required
sequences;
(3) His/her conduct of Skill Tests and Proficiency Checks (as applicable) is
fair and in conformance with the standards andprocedures described in this
manual;
7.3.1 General
It is the Operator’s responsibility to ensure the quality, legality and conduct of the examiner
and to ensure the Designated Examiner’s authority is valid before scheduling him/her to
conduct a type-rating Skill Test or Proficiency Check. To aid in this responsibility, an Operator
shall maintain records to show:
(a) The last date on which each Designated Examiner underwent a ProficiencyCheck
conducted by an Inspector (or an authorised TRE/SFE), and when his next Proficiency
Check is due;
(b) The last date on which each Designated Examiner underwent an Annual DE Monitor
Check by an Inspector and when his/her next Annual DE Monitor Check is due;
(c) The last date on which each Designated Examiner attended any required DE
Refresher Course or workshop, and when any required next course/workshop is due;
(d) A list of the Tests/Checks conducted by each Designated Examiner, at least annually,
using a reporting system approved by the BCAA.
7.3.2 Temporary Extension of Validity
If the Operator can show that it is impractical to arrange a BCAA Annual DE Monitor Check
to fulfill the requirements above, prior to the expiry date, an extension may be granted by the
BCAA on a specific case basis. Maximum extension may not exceed 30 days, from the date
the BCAA Annual DE Monitor Check was due.
In order to maintain up to date records for Designated Examiner utilization, the Operator shall
advise the BCAA when a Designated Examiner is no longer in the employ of the Company,
or will not be required to perform Designated Examiner duties during the coming 24 months.
7.4.1 General
In the cases of the Examiner Authorisation Acceptance Test and the Annual DE Monitor
Checks, the BCAA Inspector will meet with the nominee/Designated Examiner prior to
commencement of the test or check, to establish the sequence of procedures to be
demonstrated and to delineate the extent of the Inspector’s input.
Either the Inspector or the nominee/Designated Examiner may conduct pre-flight activities
including the briefing of the candidates.
Upon completion of the check ride portion of the EAAT or Annual DE Monitor Check,
CAP 10 Rev. 01 1-7-2 24 May 2022
CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATIONS
the Inspector and the nominee/Designated Examiner under monitor will confer privately, to
reach agreement on the results of the check and the items to be covered in the debriefing.
Where a disagreement exists between the evaluations of the Inspector and
nominee/Designated Examiner, the Inspector's evaluation shall take precedence, and be used
in the debriefing.
7.4.2 Documentation
(2) Enter an ‘X’ in the “I/E” box on the ALD/LIC/F061 (Pilot Check Report);
and
CHAPTER 8
8.1 GENERAL
An Examiner shall not conduct a Skill Test on a candidate for whom he has conducted the
associated conversion course training, nor shall he conduct the re-check of a candidate who
has failed a previous skill test or proficiency check, and for whom he has conducted the
necessary remedial training.
A flight crew Examiner may conduct an Operator Proficiency Check, and the Recurrent
Training session conducted in conjunction with that check, for the same candidate(s).
A flight crew Examiner may conduct a Licence Proficiency Check, and the Recurrent Training
session(s) conducted in conjunction with that check, for the same candidate(s), but only for
justifiable reasons, and provided that specific approval has been obtained from the BCAA in
each case.
This approval may be written (letter, fax, telex or e-mail), or verbal (a verbal approval number
must be obtained). If requested, written justification must also be submitted to the BCAA by
the Operator.
A copy of this written approval, or the applicable verbal approval number, must be provided
to the SFE/TRE conducting the check, with a copy and any written justification, placed on the
candidate’s file. In the case of a verbal approval, the applicable verbal approval number must
be noted in the “Comments” section of the candidate’s Pilot Check Report. Whenever this
situation occurs, the next recurrent Proficiency Check for the affected candidate shall be
conducted by a different Examiner.
(a) skill tests for the issue of type ratings for multi-pilot aeroplanes;
(b) proficiency checks for revalidation or renewal of multi-pilot type and instrument
ratings and for the revalidation of the Operator Proficiency Check;
(c) Low Visibility Operations checks (i.e. low visibility takeoffs and CAT II/III
approaches);
(d) Any other test or check, normally conducted by an Inspector, when so authorised by
the BCAA (specific approval required in each case).
(e) In addition a Type Rating Examiner (TRE) with the appropriate license, ratings and a
valid medical is authorised to conduct:
provided that the examiner has completed not less than 1 500 hours flight time as a pilot
of multi-pilot aeroplanes of which at least 500 hours shall be as pilot-in-command, andholds
or has held a TRI(A) rating or authorisation.
Note: A TRE whose medical certificate is not valid may be granted SFE authorisation on
flight simulators only. The duration of the authority shall be limited to the period of
validity of the Examiner’s licence. This authority shall remain valid only if, during the
preceding 12 calendar months, the Examiner completes a Proficiency Check and a DE
Monitor Check on the type for which Designated Examiner privileges are granted.
(a) skill tests for the issue of type ratings for multi-pilot aeroplanes;
(b) proficiency checks for revalidation or renewal of multi-pilot type and instrument
ratings and for the revalidation of the Operator Proficiency Check;
(c) Low Visibility Operations checks (i.e. low visibility takeoffs and CAT II/III
approaches);
(d) Any other test or check, normally conducted by an Inspector, when so authorised by
the BCAA (specific approval required in each case).
(e) An SFE with the appropriate license, ratings and a valid medical certificate is also
authorised to conduct Initial and Recurrent Line Checks in the aircraft.
provided that the examiner holds an ATPL(A), has completed not less than 1500 hours of
flight time as a pilot of multi-pilot aeroplanes and is entitled to exercise the privileges of a
SFI(A) and for the purpose of (a) above holds a valid type rating on the applicable aeroplane
type. (see ANTR-FCL 1.405).
Note: A SFE whose medical certificate is not valid may be granted SFE authorisation on
flight simulators only. The duration of the authority shall be limited to the period of
validity of the Examiner’s licence. This authority shall remain valid only if, during the
preceding 12 calendar months, the Examiner completes a Proficiency Check and a DE
Monitor Check, on the type for which Designated Examiner privileges are granted.
(3) proficiency checks for the revalidation or renewal of instrument ratings (H)
provided the TRE(H) holds a valid IR(H) and complies with ANTR-FCL
2.425(e);
CAP 10 Rev. 01 1-8-2 24 May 2022
2
CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATIONS
(b) For single-pilot helicopters
(3) proficiency checks for the revalidation or renewal of instrument ratings (H)
provided the TRE(H) holds a valid IR(H) and complies with ANTR-FCL
2.425(e).
(c) Any other test or check, normally conducted by an Inspector, when so authorised by
the BCAA (specific approval required in each case).
(d) In addition a Type Rating Examiner (TRE) with the appropriate license, ratings and a
valid medical is authorised to conduct:
Note: A TRE whose medical certificate is not valid may be granted SFE authorisation on
flight simulators only. The duration of the authority shall be limited to the period of
validity of the Examiner’s licence. This authority shall remain valid only if, during the
preceding 12 calendar months, the Examiner completes a Proficiency Check and a DE
Monitor Check on the type for which Designated Examiner privileges are granted.
(a) Skill tests for the issue of type ratings, provided the SFE holds a valid type rating on
the applicable helicopter type; and
(b) Proficiency checks for the revalidation and renewal of type and instrument ratings.
(c) Any other test or check, normally conducted by an Inspector, when so authorised by
the BCAA (specific approval required in each case).
(d) An SFE with the appropriate license, ratings and a valid medical certificate is also
authorised to conduct Initial and Recurrent Line Checks in the aircraft.
Note: A SFE whose medical certificate is not valid may be granted SFE authorisation on
flight simulators only. The duration of the authority shall be limited to the period of
validity of the Examiner’s licence. This authority shall remain valid only if, during
the preceding 12 calendar months, the Examiner completes a Proficiency Check and
a DE Monitor Check on the type for which Designated Examiner privileges are
granted.
CHAPTER 9
9.1 OBJECTIVE
(a) Determine, by practical demonstration, whether the applicant has reached and/or
maintained the required level of knowledge and skill for the rating;
(b) Improve the overall standards of instruction and training, by identification of those
exercises and procedures which are failed, or for which marginal performance is
commonly observed; and
(c) To ensure that safety standards are maintained and where possible improved,
throughout the aviation industry by requiring the application of sound airmanship
and flight discipline.
9.2 PROCEDURE
9.2.1 General
(a) Skill Tests and Proficiency Checks will be conducted in accordance with the standards
described in this chapter. They shall be documented on the BCAA Pilot Check Report
Form (ALD/LIC/F061).
Note: A BCAA certificated operator that has a BCAA approved training and
checking programme may develop its own Skill Test and Proficiency Check
contents and report forms, otherwise form (ALD/LIC/F061) (Pilot Check
Report form) must be used.
(b) All Skill Tests and Proficiency Checks shall be conducted with a normal crew
complement.
(c) For multi-crew operations, a Skill Test or Proficiency Check shall consist of a
demonstration of both pilot flying (PF) duties and pilot not flying (PNF) duties by each
crew member.
(d) A Skill Test or Proficiency Check of a PIC shall be completed in the seat occupied by
the pilot in- command, and a test or check of a SIC shall be completed in the seat
occupied by the second- in-command.
(e) Each SIC pilot will demonstrate his ability to perform his assigned functions during
Skill Tests and Proficiency Checks. Company limits for First Officers, of minimum
ceiling and visibility do not apply during Skill Tests and Proficiency Checks. First
Officer Company crosswind limits continue to apply.
(f) It is essential that a common standard is applied by all examiners. However, because
flights may be conducted in different and sometimes varying conditions and
circumstances, each examiner must consider all aspects when assessing the flight. The
examiner must exercise sound judgment and impartiality throughout. To assist with
this, each examiner should maintain a record of the test/check so that all aspectsmay
be debriefed comprehensively.
(g) The format for a Skill Test or Proficiency Check is intended to simulate a practical
flight environment, i.e. a commercial air transport flight. Planning and preparation
must be completed by the crew using routine planning material, in accordance with
normal operating procedures.
(h) In flight, the candidate must use the normal charts and plates, as per the applicable
company’s operation, i.e. it is not acceptable to use “home-made” line drawings or
photocopied material which has been customised or highlighted.
(i) Examiners are reminded that when check scenarios are written to offer several
operational choices, they must refrain from imposing their personal “optimum”
operational solution on the crew.
(j) Most pilots will dislike the prospect of being tested. Some applicants may become
nervous, which might affect their performance. The attitude and approach of the
examiner can do much to overcome these difficulties. The examiner must establish a
friendly and relaxed atmosphere, which will enable the applicant to properly
demonstrate his abilities. A severe or hostile approach by the examiner must be
avoided, and will not be tolerated by the BCAA.
(k) Examiners, while conducting or observing a flight check from the observer’s seat, are
cautioned not to move throttles, controls, pull circuit breakers or otherwise do anything
that would cause confusion or distraction to the flight crew.
9.2.2 Simulator
When the Proficiency Check or skill test is conducted in a simulator, all components must
be operative as per the approved aircraft MEL, and the approved Simulator Component
Inoperative Guide applicable to the simulator concerned. The motion and visual systems must
meet the standard set forth in the BCAA Simulator Approval Letter. Headset use is mandatory,
in accordance with the Operator’s SOPs, for all checks conducted in a simulator.
9.2.3 Aircraft
When the Proficiency Check or skill test is conducted in an aircraft, all components must be
operative as per the approved aircraft MEL. When any portion of a Skill Test or Proficiency
Check must be conducted in an aircraft, the aircraft portion of the test/check shall take place
within 30 days of the simulator test/check, not including the day of the test/check. When it is
impractical to arrange the airborne portion of the test/check within 30 days, the BCAA may
grant an extension upon request.
A Skill Test or Proficiency Check is normally conducted in accordance with a set lesson plan,
which is designed to ensure the accomplishment of the mandatory test/check items and
sequences. However, the examiner conducting the test/check may modify the lesson plan,
bearing in mind the assessment standards as follows:
(a) By changing the sequence of items or manoeuvres to achieve an orderly and efficient
flow of a practical flight, having regard to the existing conditions or circumstances;
(d) When an unforeseen crew decision requires subsequent modification to the scenario.
(e) Where the lesson plan has been modified for the reasons described above; examiners
must ensure that;
(2) The test is completed efficiently and without wasted time; and
In the case of Proficiency Checks conducted for the revalidation of a type rating, the examiner
must ensure that the candidate has completed at least 10 route sectors as pilot ofthe relevant
type or class of aircraft, or one route sector with an examiner during the period of validity of
the rating. This requirement (as specified in ANTR-FCL) is considered to be satisfied if the
pilot’s Annual Line Check is valid at the time of the Proficiency Check. Confirmation that
this requirement is satisfied shall be the responsibility of the operator.
(a) A pilot undergoing a Skill Test for the initial issue of an ATPL, shall operate as
“pilot flying” (PF) during all mandatory manoeuvres. Additionally, he shall
demonstrate proficiency as “pilot not flying” (PNF) during the test.
(b) The following shall be specifically assessed when testing pilots for the ATPL,
irrespective of whether the pilot acts as PF or PNF:
(3) Setting priorities and making decisions in accordance with safety aspects and
relevant rules and regulations appropriate to the operational situation,
including emergencies.
(c) The Skill Test should be accomplished, as far as possible, in a simulated line
operational environment under IFR. An essential element is the ability to plan and
conduct the flight from routine briefing material.
(d) ATPL Skill Tests shall be undertaken in accordance with the following options:
(1) In combination with a Skill Test conducted for the issue or renewal of a multi-
pilot type rating;
(3) As a separate Skill Test, conducted in accordance with a lesson plan approved
for this purpose by the CAA.
(e) An ATPL Skill Test shall include checking on Circling Approaches. The Operator’s
approved ATPL training course, which shall include simulator training covering
circling approaches, must be completed prior to the Skill Test.
(f) The “Instructor Recommendation” section of the licence application form and the Pilot
Check Report that will be used for the Skill Test, shall be completed and signedby the
Instructor/Examiner conducting the ATPL simulator training.
(g) Each ATPL Skill Test must be conducted by a CAA Inspector, or a TRE/SFE
specifically authorised for the particular check.
When conducting an Operator Proficiency Check in a simulator, the Examiner shall not
participate as a flight crew member, and shall limit his activities to the operation of the
simulator itself, and role play of “external” resources, as appropriate. However, if it is
necessary to provide training to achieve proficiency, then the Examiner may intervene as
required.
Check items must not be briefed in advance of the first execution of such manoeuvres, i.e.
prior to the “first look”. Proficiency data must be collected prior to any training and re-sit of
any first look item.
Demonstration of the required proficiency standard is required for all check items in order to
award an overall PASS for an Operator Proficiency Check.
If any item is assessed as UNSATISFACTORY on the first attempt, then, with the exception
of a crash, gross mishandling or major deviations that create a hazardous situation, training
and re-sits may be conducted at the discretion of the Examiner, in order to restore and confirm
proficiency.
The Examiner shall exercise his judgment in deciding how much additional training is
appropriate to provide during the OPC, for a pilot having difficulty achieving proficiency.
However, if more than two (2) re-sits are required for any one item, or the scheduled time
for the check has elapsed and there is no further opportunity to complete necessary re-sits, the
TRE/SFE shall award an UNSATISFACTORY (“1”) grade for the applicable item(s), and
rule the check as FAILED. Re-sits/repeats initiated by the crew as a result of their own
decision making, shall be counted towards the maximum allowed.
When conducting a Skill Test in a simulator, the Examiner shall not participate as a flight
crew member, and shall limit his activities to the operation of the simulator itself, and role
play of “external” resources as appropriate.
If any item is assessed as UNSATISFACTORY then, with the exception of a crash, gross
mishandling or major deviations that create a hazardous situation, a re-sit may be conducted
at the discretion of the Examiner. Unless a re-sit opportunity occurs “naturally”, for instance
as a result of crew decision-making during the remainder of the session, re-sits will usually be
conducted at the conclusion of the planned session, if time remains.
All re-sits shall be conducted without prior training, practice, or coaching of any kind by the
Examiner.
The Examiner shall always exercise his judgment in deciding when and/or if a re-sit is
appropriate. Although, technically, all items on the test schedule could be subject to re-sit, this
is not the intent of the discretionary authority provided to the Examiner in this respect.
If the candidate’s performance is such that several items need repeating, he is clearly not up
to the required standard, and so the discretion to repeat should not be exercised any further.
In any case, if more than one (1) re-sit is required for any one item, or the scheduled time for
the check has elapsed and there is no further opportunity to complete a re-sit, the Examiner
shall award an UNSATISFACTORY (“1”) grade for the applicable item(s), and rule the check
as FAILED. Re-sits/repeats initiated by the crew as a result of their own decision making,
shall be counted towards the maximum allowed.
A Licence Proficiency Check shall be designed and conducted to ensure the requirements
applicable to the revalidation of both the Operator Proficiency Check and the aircraft Type
Rating are completed.
When conducting an LPC, the TRE/SFE shall not participate as a flight crew member, and
shall limit his activities to the operation of the simulator itself, and role play of “external”
resources as appropriate. The LPC will be conducted strictly as scripted, without interruption
or deviation, unless required as a result of unforeseen crew decisions.
If any item is assessed as UNSATISFACTORY then, with the exception of a crash, gross
mishandling or major deviations that create a hazardous situation, a re-sit may be conducted
at the discretion of the TRE/SFE. Unless the crew repeats the item(s) as a result of their own
decision-making, the TRE/SFE may provide debriefing, training and re-sit(s), as required, in
order to restore and confirm proficiency.
The TRE/SFE shall exercise his judgment in deciding when and/or if a re-sit is appropriate,
and how much additional training is appropriate to provide during the LPC. However, if more
than two (2) re-sits are required for any one item, or the scheduled time for the check has
elapsed and there is no further opportunity to complete a re-sit, the TRE/SFE shall award an
UNSATISFACTORY (“1”) grade for the applicable item(s), and rule the check as FAILED.
Resits initiated by the crew as a result of their own decision making, shall be counted
towards the maximum allowed.
(a) An Examiner shall normally occupy an observer’s seat; the other pilot must be a
qualified instructor and shall be the nominated PIC;
(b) Subject to BCAA approval the Examiner may sit in a pilot seat during the check.
Inthis case the Examiner is also PIC.
Note; A Flight Instructor Examiner must sit in the command seat when conducting
checks with an Instructor.
(c) The PIC should bring to the trainee's attention any tendency for flight parameters to
move significantly from their target values;
(d) The PIC will be ready for instant use of all thrust levers when a `low and slow' situation
is developing;
(f) No unauthorised manoeuvres, which might jeopardize the safety of flight, shall be
conducted. In addition, no demonstrations of the flight envelope protection systems
(as applicable) will be intentionally carried out;
(g) Practice rejected takeoffs will not be conducted. The decision to reject a take-off is
made exclusively by the PIC, who will immediately take control of the aircraft. This
requirement shall be emphasized during the briefing conducted prior to flight, and
shall be re-emphasized during the pre-takeoff briefing conducted in the aircraft;
(j) An engine shall not be shut down during aircraft training. Engine “failure” shall be
simulated by retarding a thrust lever to the idle stop, having first checked the correct
functioning of the other engine(s). Engine failure on take-off or go around should only
be simulated after gear-up selection, and after a steady climb attitude has been
achieved.
(m) Visual circuits shall not be conducted if cloud base is less than 1500ft AGL or visibility
less than 5 km;
(n) ILS approaches, via radar vectors, may be used, provided the cloud base is not less
than 500 ft AGL and the visibility is not less than 3 km.
Prior to commencing any Skill Test or Proficiency Check, the Examiner shall examine and
verify:
(c) The validity of the pilot’s Licence and Medical Certificate of each candidate;
(d) The applicable training report(s) or file, including the instructor recommendation, for
each candidate (not required if recurrent training is to be conducted after an Operator
Proficiency Check);
(e) The aircraft technical log book (for a check/test conducted in an aircraft); and
(f) The simulator status and documents, including simulator approval certificate,
technical log book and Component Inoperative Guide.
A check ride will not be conducted if licensing and training documents are not presented, are
not valid, or if the company has failed to provide appropriate training for the candidate(s), as
specified in the Operator's approved training programme.
The Base Month is the month in which the Skill Test for the issue or renewal of a type rating
is successfully completed (on the base aircraft type, for pilots operating on more than one type
or variant). Where an aircraft test/check is required, it is established at the completionof the
aircraft test/check.
The validity period for a Type Rating and Instrument Rating is 12 calendar months, in addition
to the remainder of the month of issue, i.e. the base month.
The validity period of the Operator Proficiency Check is 6 calendar months, expiring
alternately at the end of the base month, and the sixth month following the base month.
A Type Rating and Instrument Rating are revalidated by successful completion of a Licence
Proficiency Check. The LPC shall be conducted within the final 3 calendar months of the
validity period.
An Operator Proficiency Check shall be conducted within the final 3 calendar months prior to
the end of the validity period of the previous Operator Proficiency Check.
9.8.4 Extensions
The BCAA may extend the validity period of a Type Rating or Operator Proficiency Check,
by up to 2 calendar months where the BCAA is of the opinion that safety is not compromised.
Applications for extension must be submitted in writing to the BCAA office responsible for
the Operator concerned, prior to the expiry of the current validity period. Appropriate
justification for the extension must be included with each application. BCAA will only
consider circumstances that are beyond the control of the operator as justification for an
extension.
9.9 BRIEFING
9.9.1 General
A pre-flight briefing of the candidate(s) for a test or check is mandatory. It must include the
following information (as applicable, depending on whether an aircraft or simulator check is
to be conducted):
(a) The mandatory items to be demonstrated during the check/test, when the check/test
is conducted in the aircraft;
(c) Any restrictions or limits imposed on manoeuvres conducted in the aircraft, which are
necessary to ensure flight safety;
(d) The serviceability of the simulator, and any differences from the aircraft;
(g) That the aircraft or simulator is to be flown in accordance with flight manual
requirements, SOPs and within acceptable tolerances;
(h) The actions to be completed in the event of a real emergency or malfunction in the
aircraft or simulator.
(m) For the purpose of the test or check, the weather will be simulated at or below the
weather minima for the type of approach being carried out. In a visual simulator, the
Designated Examiner will control the visual system to the minima specified in the
lesson plan, appropriate to the exercise being conducted;
(n) When a test or check is conducted in the aircraft, the Examiner will call “go around”
if he requires the candidate to execute a missed approach;
(1) aircraft flight manual, aircraft operating manual or pilot operating handbook;
Candidates for the ATPL Skill Test shall be briefed by the Inspector, TRE or SFE conducting
the test on the following:
(3) Set priorities and make decisions in accordance with safety aspects andrelevant
rules and regulations appropriate to the operational situation, including
emergencies.
(b) That although the pilot-in-command retains all command responsibility and overall
responsibility for the safety of the operation, the First Officer test candidate should
make all initial responses and decisions, including those related to abnormalities.
9.10 GRADES
9.10.1 General
Unless the operator has a BCAA approved training and checking programme and uses its own
developed grading system, each sequence of a check/test shall be graded according to either
the following grading standards and definitions or the grading system in Part 2. The
appropriate grade shall be recorded on the Pilot Check Report Form (ALD/LIC/F061).
Note 1: Refer to Part 2, Module 2 for another grading system
Note 2: A failure of licence skill test or licence proficiency check must be notified to
the BCAA using ALD/LIC/F131.
1 = UNSATISFACTORY
A grade of UNSATISFACTORY shall be awarded for a check or test item in accordance with
any of the following criteria:
(c) Crew resource management skills and behaviours are not effective.
This grade shall be assigned if initial performance is well below the Operator’s required
standard, or (at Examiner discretion) if a pilot was unable to demonstrate the required standard
after a maximum of:
(a) Training (at SFE/TRE discretion) and two (2) re-sits, during a Proficiency Check; or
Typical situations resulting in an “Unsatisfactory” grade (1) being awarded, either before or
after a re-sit, include:
(d) Deviations occur which violate an ATC clearance, or endanger the aircraft.
(e) An improper emergency procedure is used which creates a more hazardous situation.
This grade shall be assigned if performance of any check or test item did not meet the expected
standard, but where standard may be restored by the conduct of an appropriate debriefing.
The grade shall be assigned in accordance with any of the following criteria:
(b) Proficiency in an item is adequate, but occasionally falls below the required
standard.
(c) Crew resource management skills and behaviours are not completely effective.
(a) Deviations from the required standard occur, but the crew corrects and safety is not
compromised.
(b) An emergency procedure deviates from the prescribed checklist, but does not create
a more hazardous situation.
(c) Deviations from SOP’s are observed, but flight safety is not compromised.
3 = STANDARD
This grade shall be assigned if performance of a check or test item meets the required standard,
in accordance with the following criteria:
(a) Performance meets expectations and provides sustained safe flight operations.
(c) Crew resource management skills and behaviours are clearly effective.
(d) Errors are recognised and resolved so that safety of flight is not diminished.
4 = ABOVE STANDARD
This grade shall be assigned if performance of a check or test item exceeds the required
standard, in accordance with the following criteria:
(a) Performance is above expectations and provides sustained safe flight operations.
(b) Proficiency in an item meets and occasionally exceeds all required standards.
(c) Crew resource management skills and behaviours are clearly effective and
occasionally exceptional.
The following examples are provided to assist Examiners in the application of the grading
codes specified above.
However, if the second resit is successful, then a grade of “2”, “3” or “4” (as
applicable) shall be assigned to the sequence. Appropriate reason code(s), number of
resits and comments and comments shall be entered for the sequence concerned.
It is impossible to define all instances when a particular exercise should be graded "1", "2",
"3" or "4". However, it is possible to examine each sequence of a check, and test its validity
against the definition for each grade. By applying this test to all exercises, standardization can
be achieved in Proficiency Check and Skill Test assessments. Each sequence of the
Proficiency Check, including any errors or mistakes, shall be evaluated with respect to the
grade definitions.
Common errors and rating assessments are described by a variety of adjectives. Terms such
as (un)acceptable, (un)satisfactory, timely, safe, minor, slight, brief, lack, inadequate and
excessive are used to describe a candidate’s performance. It is difficult to objectively define
these adjectives; however, the dictionary definition may be used to provide amplification of
meaning and thereby standardization in application.
Terms such as (in)complete, (in)correct, exceed and failure are more finite, and may be
objectively described by referring to the appropriate regulation, AFM or company procedure.
Examiners shall use the assessment guidelines as a reference when determining the grade to
be awarded for specific test sequences and items. These guidelines are not intended to be
restrictive or to define all common errors. Examiners must use knowledge, experience and
sound judgment, in conjunction with the grade definitions, to arrive at their assessments.
During a Proficiency Check or Skill Test, a flight sequence may involve duties and/or
responsibilities for crew members other than the "pilot flying". Such a sequence that is rated
as "1" or "2" for the pilot flying, may, due to inappropriate action on the part of other crew
members, be rated as "1" or "2" for the non-flying crew member also.
If a simulator is used, remember that the examiner is acting as ATC, and therefore would not
know that the crew have suffered an engine/systems failure, unless they give out a
PAN/MAYDAY.
It is up to the crew to liaise with you. It is solely the crew’s responsibility to reduce airspeed,
ask to hold, or extend the final, should they wish more time to carry out the check lists etc.
When assessing non-technical or CRM skills (NOTECHS), the relevant behavioural markers
must have been observed during the course of the test/check.
When making an assessment, handling qualities and performance should be taken into
account. Further, the examiner should make allowance for turbulent conditions.
The candidate need not be failed if an error of more than 100ft occurs several times.
However, the examiner should seriously consider awarding a grade “1” or “2”, if:-
A failure should be awarded at any time during the test/check if there is an inability to
settle within +/- 5 of the specified track or correcting track the wrong way and
maintaining the error for an unreasonable period.
An oral examination shall be conducted prior to each Skill Test or Proficiency Check. It shall
be solely concerned with testing the knowledge of items that a pilot should have available by
recall, in order to operate safely and efficiently. Such testing should concentrate on the
following areas:
(c) Limitations;
(e) Systems knowledge required to understand and correctly apply normal and non-
normal checklists related to the training cycle;
(h) CRM concepts and practices (as specified in the Operator’s approved CRM training
programme); and
(i) Operational subjects, such as correct application of Aerodrome Operating Minima and
performance data.
Examiners must ensure that if two pilots are under check, then each is subjected to an
approximately equal amount on oral questioning. Nevertheless, if a pilot does exhibit a lack
of knowledge, this will justify additional questioning to establish whether or not a "Fail" grade
shall be assigned.
All questions concerning Limitations, Recall Checklists, SOPs and Standard Calls should be
answered correctly, after an opportunity to re-think an initial incorrect answer.
The majority of questions related to other topics should be answered correctly. Examiners
are expected to exercise good judgment in assessing whether the level of overall knowledge
is adequate to ensure safe operation of the aircraft.
The result of the Oral Examination shall be communicated immediately on its completion,
and prior to the simulator/aircraft phase of the test/check.
The result of an Oral Examination shall be indicated on the Pilot Check Report.
If a pilot fails the Oral Examination, the entire Skill Test or Proficiency Check for the crew
pairing (if applicable), is terminated immediately, and the pilot in question so informed.
The following section describes assessment standards and guidelines applicable to the items
required to be completed during a Skill Test or Proficiency Check. The numbers specified
below are those used to identify individual test/check items in ANTR-OPS and ANTR-FCL,
and which are also depicted on the BCAA Pilot Check Report Form (ALD/LIC/F061).
• Checks and cockpit procedures shall be carried out in compliance with the authorised
check list for the aircraft type used in the test. Performance data for take-off, approach
and landing shall be calculated by the applicant in compliance with the Operations
Manual or Flight Manual for the aircraft used and should be agreed with the examiner.
• This item does not stipulate that it has to be the first flight of the day, however some
thought should be given, when designing lesson plans, to alternating first flights with
transit checks, to make sure that there is a comprehensive knowledge of the check list.
• The candidate must complete a normal start procedure and/or deal with any
malfunctions.
• Crews must refrain from any activity that would compromise lookout on the ramp or
taxiway.
• Completes any applicable pre-departure checks. Care should be taken, when designing
lesson plans, to ensure that first flight of the day and transit checks are alternated, so
that the knowledge of the various systems checks that are carried out on a first flight
are not overlooked.
• Obtains a clearance.
9.13.3 Take-Offs
• A complete take-off briefing need only be completed once by each crew. Discussing
specific safety items, or changes to the original departure, constitute an acceptable
briefing for subsequent take-offs.
• The examiner must ensure that published cockpit procedures and correct airspeeds are
observed during ground roll and lift off. The airplane should be rotated smoothly to
the correct pitch angle, with a satisfactory rate of climb and required airspeed attained
in a reasonable time.
• Engine handling must be smooth and positive and the correct power setting used and
monitored.
• In an aircraft this should be after V2 when safely away from the ground, and should be
simulated by closing a throttle completely. Shut down checks should be done by use
of a touch drill.
• The Engine Failure Procedures (EFP) (Emergency Turn (ET)) is flown as designed.
• A question often asked is "how much swing is acceptable on an engine failure". There
are no published tolerances. Each aircraft type has its own characteristics, and this in
turn will depend on the time of the engine failure and the type of failure given.
• The rejected take-off should be taken to its full conclusion. e.g. Would the aircraft taxi
onto stand? Was brake cooling, evacuation or a further take-off considered, etc.
• If the duties for the RTO are divided, and it is performed incorrectly, care must be
taken to correctly assess whether the grade in this item should be attributed to just one
or both pilots.
• RTOs must not be performed in an aircraft, other than as a static touch drill.
• If the Operator procedures mean that the co-pilot never aborts a take-off, it will be
necessary to manufacture a reason for the co-pilot to initiate the stop e.g. the
incapacitation of the captain who then obstructs the controls. This scenario should be
included in the three-yearly recurrent training and checking cycle.
• Full use of automatics and LNAV (if fitted) is permitted. Designers of lesson plans are
encouraged to use their imagination to obtain maximum benefit from this item of the
test. For example, if LNAV is used, a departure with a close in turn that may require
some speed control, or a change to ATC clearance that may require some
reprogramming of the FMS, might be appropriate.
• Some interpretation of departure and/or arrival plates should be included. If you are
using an aircraft and based at an airport that does not have a published instrument
departure or arrival procedure, a clearance should be given by the examiner or gained
from ATC, that includes some form of altitude/turn/track adherence. A departure,
which only consists of radar vectors, should not be used.
• Climb/descent transitions between flight levels and altitudes using correct altimeter
setting procedures.
• Flight management is demonstrated with a flight log, fuel and system checks,
including anti-ice procedures when necessary.
• The candidate should comply with applicable arrival and joining procedures.
• If the arrival procedure contains a hold or the crew requests one, this can be assessed.
• Automatics can be used, and therefore in lesson plans design, value can be obtained
by giving a last minute clearance into the hold, or if FMS is fitted, an early exit from
the hold to see how the FMS is handled.
• Multiple, unrelated failures will not be required, but the candidate must be prepared to
take corrective action on related failures, e.g., loss of hydraulics or electrical supply
due to a failed engine. Where a single checklist exists for a multiple system failure,
the failure is not deemed to be a multiple, unrelated failure; for example, dual hydraulic
failures.
9.13.8 Smoke/pressurisation
• The use of the oxygen mask is an essential part of an emergency descent with cabin
pressure failure, and contaminated cockpit drills. The crews' ability to establish
communication with each other, ATC, cabin crew etc. can only be assessed if masks
are used.
• This should be taken to its full conclusion, e.g. would a co-pilot without nose wheel
steering taxi, and how far?
• If he has asked the ambulance to meet the aircraft how does he handle this?
• In lesson plan design, some thought should be given as to how to instigate the
incapacitation, i.e. when and how the incapacitation is to occur. A subtle incapacitation
is the hardest to recognise and checks that company SOPs are satisfactory.
• While lesson plan design may normally combine various test items for expediency,
as this particular exercise is fairly demanding, it may be wise not to load thecandidate
in this way.
• The autopilot should be disconnected before intercepting the localizer and before final
configuration for the approach, so that the candidate’s handling of any trim change
associated with flap extension can be assessed. The engine failure shouldalso be
simulated prior to this phase.
• This may be flown either automatically or manually, as per the Operator’s SOPs. It
must be flown to the specified minima, and not to circling minima, unless they are
coincident.
• Engine Failure Procedures (EFP) (or Emergency Turn (ET)), is flown as designed.
• Directional control must be maintained, and brakes and other retardation devices used
to achieve a safe roll out and deceleration.
• The applicant must complete a safe landing from a stable approach on the required
glide path.
• Consideration should be given to the weather, wind conditions, landing surface and
obstructions.
• Maintain control of the aircraft at all times in a manner such that the successful
outcome of a procedure or manoeuvre is never seriously in doubt. The applicant's
airmanship must be assessed with each exercise, and this must include lookout, checks
and drills, cockpit management, ATC liaison, fuel management, icing precautions,
planning and use of airspace etc.;
• Set priorities and make decisions in accordance with safety considerations, and
relevant rules and regulations, appropriate to the operation situation, including
emergencies;
Note: A failure of licence skill test or licence proficiency check must be notified to
the BCAA using ALD/LIC/F131.
CHAPTER 10
10.1 GENERAL
Line checks shall be conducted so as to establish the ability of the crew member(s) concerned:
(a) To perform satisfactorily a complete line operation, including the pre-flight and post
flight procedures, and use of the equipment provided, as specified in the Operations
Manual;
(b) To assess the Crew Resource Management skills of the flight crew member(s)
concerned;
(c) In the case of Commanders, or pilots to whom the conduct of the flight may be
delegated, the ability to manage the flight and to make command decisions shall also
be demonstrated; and
(d) To check the operation of each flight crew member in the functions of Pilot Flying
(PF) and Pilot Not Flying (PNF).
A minimum of one sector as PF and one sector as PNF shall be conducted during the Line
Check of each flight crew member.
Line Checks shall be conducted by a TRE or SFE, or commanders nominated by the operator
and acceptable to the BCAA and be suitably qualified in the assessment of CRM skills.
Line checks shall be conducted over a route selected to allow adequate representation of the
scope of normal flight operations.
(a) A suitably-qualified Captain occupying a pilot’s seat shall be the nominated PIC;
(b) The TRE conducting the check shall occupy an observer’s seat;
(c) The TRE shall not simulate system/ engine failures of any kind;
(d) The PIC decides which pilot shall be PF or PNF (a demonstration of PF and PNF
duties by each crew member under check is still required to complete the check);
(e) The PIC shall decide the level of automation or type of approach aid to be used; and
(f) The TRE shall alert the crew to all flight safety hazards immediately.
Prior to commencing any Line Check, the TRE/SFE or commanders nominated by the
operator shall examine and verify the validity of each candidate’s:
CHAPTER 11
CERTIFICATE OF TEST
11.1 GENERAL
The holder of a flight crew licence is authorised to exercise the privileges of the licence only
with a current and appropriate Certificate of Test. The Certificate of Test form ALD/LIC/F010
includes a section on rating issue or revalidation (see below). The Certificate of Test is
intended for the initial issue, renewal and revalidation of;
Note: The entries are made by the BCAA Inspector or Designated Examiner
This section shall be completed by the Examiner who conducts the test. The Examiner, being
a person authorised by Bahrain BCAA to sign this form in respect of issue/revalidation of a
rating, to certify that on the date specified, the holder of this certificate passed a
test/check/evaluation test as PIC (annotated P1) or SIC (annotated P2) or Flight Engineer,
(annotated FE) on the aircraft type or Simulator approved for this purpose by Bahrain Civil
Aviation Affairs.
Note: The Certificate of Test is used to indicate skill or proficiency checks for renewal of
the rating and not the 6 monthly OPC.
Where revalidation entries have been made on the Certificate of Test by the examiner, the
examiner will:
(1) ratings,
(5) signature;
(b) submit the original of the skill test/proficiency check form to the BCAA and hold
onecopy of the check form on personal file.
EXAMPLE
Note 1: This C of T form is only used for skill and proficiency checks, not for OPC
unless incorporated and must include IR and MPA
Note 2: The types/classes are available from the BCAA or they can be obtained from
the EASA website at www.easa.europa.eu..
Note 4: A multi-pilot instrument rating (IR) is not valid for single-pilot aeroplanes.
Note 5: Pilots holding both multi-pilot and single-pilot type/class ratings are
required to have a current single-pilot IR to maintain instrument rating
privileges on single-pilot aeroplanes and are not permitted to use their multi-
pilot instrument rating for that purpose.
Note 6: The revalidation requirements of ANTR-FCL 1.245 (b) will be met when an
applicant operating under ANTR-OPS 1 fulfils the Operator Proficiency Check
requirements contained in ANTR-OPS 1.965, and if the operator demonstrates
to the satisfaction of the Authority that the mandatory items from Appendix 2
to ANTR-FCL 1.240 & 1.295 or Appendix 3 to ANTR-FCL 1.240 are fulfilled
during the 12 months prior to the revalidation in accordance with ANTR-OPS
1.965(a)(2). For this purpose the Operator Proficiency Check shall be
performed in the three months immediately preceding the expiry date of the
rating. If these requirements are satisfied, the Certificate of Test can be
signed.
11.4 ABBREVIATIONS
Note: The reverse side of the Certificate of Test is intended for the English Language
Proficiency Test and the entries are made only by the testing organisation accepted
by the BCAA.
PART 2
MODULE 1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 General
Part 2 of the CAP is based on the latest edition of the EASA Flight Examiner Manual and
comprises 11 modules. The CAP is intended to be the main reference manual for the training
and subsequent reference of examiners.
ANTR-FCL references are shown in italics but Examiners should not to rely on those
references unless they are checked against the most recent version of ANTR FCL.
Each module contains quick reference tables. These are intended to provide the examiner with
a precise of the essential requirements for each test/check. At the discretion of the Authority
these tables may be extracted into a Flight Examiners Handbook (FEH) or the operator’s
Operations Manual (OMD).
1.1.2 Contents:
1.2.6 Authorisation
ANTR-FCL 1.030/2.030
The Authority will designate and authorise as Examiners suitably qualified persons
of integrity to conduct, on its behalf, skill tests and proficiency checks. The minimum
ratings for Examiners are detailed in ANTR-FCL 1 and 2, Subpart I. The Authority
will notify examiner responsibilities and privileges to them individually, in writing,
specifying the type of skill tests and proficiency checks that may be conducted.
All Examiners must be suitably trained, qualified and experienced for their role on the
relevant type/class of aeroplane/helicopter. No specific rules on qualification can be
made because the particular circumstance of each organisation will differ. It is
important, however, that in every instance, the Examiner should, by background and
experience, have the professional respect of the aviation community.
An examiner will be designated and authorised in accordance with ANTR-FCL and will
be:
Inspectors of the Authority supervising examiners will ideally meet the same requirements
as the examiners being supervised. However, it is unlikely that they could be so qualified on
the large variety of types and tasks for which they have a responsibility and, since they
normally only observe training and testing, it is acceptable if they are qualified for the role of
an inspector.
The Authority will maintain a register of examiners, containing the files of examiners who
meet the requirements for the approvals sought.
Examiners need not have a residence within the designating geographical area of jurisdiction;
however, an examiner must be able to provide examiner service in the areain order to be
CAP 10 Rev. 01 2-1-2 24 May 2022
CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATIONS
considered for approval.
Examiner candidates shall apply to the Authority. A recommendation for the approval of a
candidate who does not meet all of the applicable requirements may be accepted and will be
forwarded to the Authority for consideration. The recommendation should include a statement
of all special circumstances affecting the approval.
If the candidate meets the applicable ANTR-FCL criteria and there is documented need, the
Authority will advise the nominee and sponsoring organization in writing that the application
is acceptable and the authorization process will continue. If the nominee does not fully meet
the ANTR-FCL criteria, BCAA will inform as to how the deficiency may be corrected. For
example, BCAA may require that the nominee take a knowledge or skill test.
1.4.1 Use of ‘Dummies’ during the Examiner Authorization Acceptance Test (EAAT)
Definitions
It is necessary to clarify the roles of the respective members of the Examiner Authorisation
Acceptance Test process as follows:
Acceptance Test: Skill Test conducted by a BCAA Inspector for the initial issue of
examiner authorisation
The purpose of the EAATis to prove that the candidate for an initial examiner authorisation is
proficient and capable to undertake the duties of an examiner.
It is important that all Pre-Flight Briefings are thorough and that all members of the flight
are aware of their duties and responsibilities throughout the EAAT.
1.4.3 ‘Dummy’
The primary duty of a ‘Dummy’ is to act as an applicant in all aspects of the flight and the
“dummy” should have available the relevant paperwork to show the candidate when
requested. During the flight it is important that he makes some errors (whether by accident or
by design is not important), so that the candidate must observe, exercise judgement, and assess
and will have something to debrief on. The errors are important so that the candidate can be
observed completing paperwork and detailing any retesting or retraining that may be
considered necessary. The ‘dummy’ must not make the errors too subtle or set any traps for
the candidate; he/she must try to produce a typical flight from a marginal applicant. The
purpose of the flight is to ensure that the candidate is aware of his/her duties as an Examiner.
A ‘Pass’ with no errors would prove very little. Therefore the ‘dummy’ needs to be an
experienced examiner. Any other pilot acting as ‘dummy’ may be reluctant to make errors in
CAP 10 Rev. 01 2-1-3 24 May 2022
CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATIONS
case they would be recorded against him/her and have the possibility of losing his/her rating,
also, he/she may not be sufficiently experienced to produce convincing errors.
1.4.4 Reserved
1.4.5 Responsibilities - Captaincy
The candidate or his/her company would normally provide the aeroplane for an Examiner
Authorisation Acceptance Test. When the candidate is occupying a pilot’s seat, he/she is the
only one with a clear view and full access to the controls, and often is most familiar with the
type, thus he/she must be the Captain and the safety of the flight for the EAAT is his/her
responsibility. The BCAA Inspector and the “dummy” applicant also have responsibility not
to endanger the aeroplane, but they may not have full access to lookout or controls.
ANTR-FCL 1.420/2.420
These regulations recognise 6 roles for pilot Examiner (Aeroplanes) and 5 roles for pilot
Examiner (Helicopters):
1.5.1 Pre-requisites
Before training and at all times when the examiner authorisation is to be exercised (unless
dispensation is given by the Authority) examiners are to:
• Hold a licence and rating granting privileges at least equal to the licence or
rating for which they are authorised to conduct tests/checks.
TRE AUTHORISATION
ANTR reference : ANTR-FCL 1.425/2.425
Who can test: An Inspector of the Authority
Form used: Authority Form
Test format: • Based on the ATPL skill test: brief, conduct and assess a skill test flown by
an applicant, or an examiner acting as the applicant.
• The authorisation will be type specific
SFE AUTHORISATION
ANTR reference : ANTR-FCL 1.425/2.425
Who can test: An Inspector of the Authority
Form used: Authority Form
Test format: • Based on the type rating skill test: brief, conduct and assess a skill test
flown by an applicant, or an examiner or acting as the applicant.
• The authorisation will be flight simulator and Type Specific
Training for a first examiner authorisation shall not commence until the Authority has selected
and approved the candidate for training. Where a current examiner authorisation is held the
Authority shall specify the required elements of training required. Where an examiner no
longer holds a valid authorisation the Authority shall apply both selection requirements and
specify the required elements of training required.
1.7 AUTHORISATION
ANTR-FCL 1.030/2.030
The Authority will maintain a list of all examiners it has authorised stating for which roles
they are authorised. The list will be made available to TRTOs, FTOs and registered facilities
with the Authority. The Authority will determine by which means the examiners will be
allocated to the skill test.
The Authority will advise each applicant of the examiner(s) it has designated for the conduct
of the skill test for the issue of an ATPL(A/(H)).
Examiners shall be issued with a document showing precise details of:
• their authorisation
• aeroplane/helicopter on which they may test/check
• any restrictions to the authorisation any further privileges to the authorisation
The grant of an authorisation will require the successful completion of the appropriate
examiner acceptance test
ANTR-FCL 1.430/2.430
An examiner’s authorisation is valid for not more than three years. Examiners are re-
authorised at the discretion of the Authority, and in accordance with Appendix 1 to ANTR-
FCL 1.425/2.425.
1.11.1 Reauthorisation
AEROPLANE
TRE/SFE REAUTHORISATION
ANTR reference : Appendix 1 to ANTR-FCL 1.425
Reauthorisation An examiner’s authorisation is valid for not more than three years and shall be
reauthorised at the discretion of the Authority
Who can test: An Inspector of the Authority
Form used: Authority forms
Test format: • Conduct at least 2 Skill tests or Proficiency checks in every yearly period
within the 3 year authorisation period
• 1 test in the last 12 months to be observed or a ‘dummy’ test
• Compliance with current standardisation arrangements
• Demonstration of knowledge of ANTR-FCL and operational documents
Quick reference
HELICOPTER
TRE/SFE REAUTHORISATION
ANTR reference : Appendix 1 to ANTR-FCL 2.425
Reauthorisation Valid 3 years, shall be reauthorised in accordance with ANTR-FCL 2.430
Who can test: An Inspector of the Authority
Form used: Authority forms
Test format: • Conduct at least 2 Skill tests or Proficiency checks in every yearly period
within the 3 year authorisation period
• 1 test in the last 12 months to be observed or a ‘dummy’ test
• Compliance with current standardisation arrangements
• Demonstration of knowledge of ANTR-FCL and operational documents
A new authorisation cannot be added by oral check alone and is to be actioned as an initial
authorisation.
The Authority may grant examiners authorisation to sign licence pages for the revalidationof
items successfully passed by Proficiency Check.
In the case of a practical test with an actual applicant and an unsuccessful examiner applicant,
the inspector will complete and sign the appropriate documentation.
ANTR-FCL 1.030/2.030
Examiners shall not test applicants to whom flight instruction has been given by them for that
licence or rating except with the express consent in writing of the Authority
On completion of the required training, the skill test for the CPL(A/H) in Phase 4 of the ATP
integrated course may be taken with a locally-based FE(A/H) designated and authorised by
the Authority, provided that the examiner is authorised in accordance with ANTR-FCL
Subpart I and completely independent from the FTO except with the expressed consent in
writing of the Authority.
MODULE 2
EXAMINER TRAINING
2.1 CONTENTS
2.1 General
2.2 Training Content
2.3 Test/Check Standards
2.4 Purpose of test and checks
2.5 Examiner preparation for test/check
2.6 Weather minima
2.7 Pre flight – briefing
2.8 Applicant’s planning and facilities
2.9 Airmanship
2.10 Assessment System
2.10.1 Flight Management
2.10.2 Conduct of test/check
2.10.3 Repeat items
2.10.4 Pass/fail criteria
2.10.5 The result
2.11 Post flight – debrief
2.12 Complaints and Appeals
2.2 GENERAL
An inspector of the Authority, will observe all examiner applicants conducting a test on an
‘applicant’ in an aeroplane/helicopter for which examiner authorisation is sought. Items from
the ‘Syllabi for training and skill tests/proficiency check will be selected by the inspector for
examination of the ‘applicant’ by the examiner applicant. Having agreed with the inspector
the content of the test, the examiner applicant will be expected to manage the entire test.
This will include briefing, the conduct of the flight, assessment and debriefing of the
‘applicant’. The inspector will discuss the assessment with the examiner applicant before the
‘applicant’ is debriefed and informed of the result
2.3.1 Trainers
Inspectors of the Authority supervising examiners will ideally meet the same requirements
as the examiners being supervised. However, it is unlikely that they could be so qualified
on the large variety of types and tasks for which they have a responsibility and, since they
normally only observe training and testing, it is acceptable if they are qualified for the
role of an inspector.
AMC FCL 1.425/2.425 paragraph 4
The Authority will employ, or have available, a sufficient number of inspectors to conduct,
supervise and/or inspect the standardisation arrangements according to ANTR-FCL
1.425(c)/2.425(c).
The standardisation arrangements should include, as appropriate to the role of the examiner,
at least the following instruction:
All items above are core knowledge requirements for an examiner and are recommended as
core course material. This core course may be studied before recommended examinertraining
is commenced. The core course may utilise any training format and would be prepared by the
Authority.
(a) Knowledge and management of the test for which the authorisation is to be sought.
These are described in the relevant Modules in this CAP.
(c) For an initial examiner authorisation practical training in the examination of the test
profile sought is required.
(d) An Examiner Authorisation Acceptance Test (EAAT) flight with an Inspector , e.g.,
for TRE this is to be the TRE skill test.
TRE
Core • ANTR CAP package
course • FEH where this is used nationally
• Training course on ANTR-FCL requirements and procedures
• Package self test
Ground
training
Test of Core Course material
• Test /check profiles
• SE/ME test/check differences training (as required)
• Partial pass criteria
• Repeat criteria
• Aborted test
• Fail criteria
• Use of STDs for test/check (as required)
One half day to cover:
• Administration
• Revalidation by experience (SEP & TMG) only
Flight test Two skill test/ One skill Two skill test/ proficiency check under supervision
and check proficiency test or
training check under proficiency
(flight) supervision check
under
supervision
Additional
training To be determined by the Authority
(b) It is emphasised that test/check applicants should concern themselves only with flying
and operating the aeroplane/helicopter to the best of their ability. Definitionof, and
compliance with, the Test Standards is the responsibility of the Examiner, however
these are shown in Modules 3 and 4 in the interest of openness and as a reference for
the Examiner and applicant
(c) The Examiner is expected to display sound judgement particularly when establishing
any abnormal or simulated emergency exercise so that the safety of the flight is
never placed at risk.
(d) Throughout the flight compliance with briefing/checklists, procedures, anti-icing and
de-icing precautions, airmanship, ATC liaison and compliance, RT procedures, flight
management and MCC (where applicable) will be assessed.
(e) Examiners are reminded that applicants may appeal against the conduct of any
test/check in accordance with regulations.
ANTR-FCL 1.001/2.001
• A Flight Test or Skill test is a demonstration of knowledge and skill for a licence or
rating issue and may include such oral examination as the Examiner may determine
necessary.
• AMC FCL 1.425/2.425 paragraph 10: Improve training and flight instruction in
registered facilities, FTOs and TRTOs by feedback of information from examiners
concerning items/sections of tests/checks that are most frequently failed;
• AMC FCL 1.425/2.425 paragraph 11: Assist in maintaining and, where possible,
improving air safety standards by having examiners display good airmanship and flight
discipline during tests/checks.
(a) AMC FCL 1.425/2.425 paragraph 25c: Pre-flight briefing should include:
- test/check sequence;
- safety considerations
(b) AMC FCL 1.425/2.425 paragraph 25d: In-flight exercises will include:
(c) AMC FCL 1.425/2.425 paragraph 25e: Post-flight de-briefing should include:
- pre-flight briefing;
- post-flight de-briefing
An examiner should encourage a friendly and relaxed atmosphere to develop both before and
during a test/check flight. A negative or hostile approach should not be used. During the
test/check flight, the examiner should avoid negative comments or criticisms and all
assessments should be reserved for the de-briefing.
An examiner should supervise all aspects of the test/check flight preparation, including, where
necessary, obtaining or assuring an ATC “slot” time.
An examiner will plan a test/check in accordance with ANTR-FCL requirements. Only the
manoeuvres and procedures set out in the appropriate test/check form will be undertaken. The
same examiner should not re-examine a failed applicant without the agreement of the
applicant.
The examiner shall be the pilot-in-command, except in circumstances agreed by the examiner.
An examiner should plan per working day not more than three test checks relating to PPL,
CPL, IR or class rating, or more than two tests/checks related to FI, CPL/IR and ATPL or
more than four tests/checks relating to type/rating.
An examiner should plan at least three hours for a PPL, CPL, IR or class rating test/checks,
and at least four hours for FI, CPL/IR, ATPL or type rating tests/checks, including pre-flight
briefing and preparation, conduct of the test/check, de-briefing and evaluation of the applicant
and documentation.
An examiner should allow an applicant adequate time to prepare for a test/check, normally not
more than one hour.
An examiner should plan a test/check flight so that the flight time in an aeroplane/helicopter or
ground time in an approved synthetic training device is not less than:
Before meeting the applicant the Examiner must be properly prepared for the flight. The
Examiner should supervise all aspects of the test/check flight preparation, including, where
necessary, obtaining or assuring an ATC services as required.
The Examiner will plan a test/check in accordance with ANTR-FCL requirements. Only those
manoeuvres and procedures required in the appropriate test/check form will be undertaken.
(a) Adequate and appropriate briefing/debriefing facilities must be used for all tests.
(b) Instruction for the associated theoretical knowledge examinations shall always have
been completed before each skill test is taken.
(c) Knowledge elements not evident in the demonstrated skills may be tested by
questioning, at anytime, during the flight event. Questioning in flight should be used
judiciously so that safety is not jeopardised. Questions may be deferred until after the
flight portion of the test is completed.
(d) For aeroplane/helicopter requiring only one pilot, the examiner may not assist the
applicant in the management of the aeroplane/helicopter, radio communications,
tuning and identifying navigational equipment, and using navigation charts.
(e) If occupying a pilot seat the examiner shall not take part in the operation of the
aeroplane/helicopter other than for safety.
(f) Flight Safety shall be the prime consideration at all times. The examiner, applicant
and any other crew shall be alert for other traffic.
Expansion of the details of the items (a) to (f) above are covered under the relevantparagraph
headings below.
A test/check flight will be conducted in accordance with the aeroplane/helicopter flight manual
(AFM) and, if applicable, the aeroplane/helicopter operators manual (AOM).
A test/check flight will be conducted within the limitations contained in the operations manual
of a FTO/TRTO and, where applicable, the operations manual of a registered facility.
Pre-flight preparation requires the applicant to assess the weather conditions and make his
decision whether to proceed with the flight. The applicant must take into account the
requirements of all the sections of the test that he is taking. The Examiner is to assess the
applicant’s decision. A decision to continue when the weather is forecast below the limits
required to complete the flight shall be considered a fail item for test/check
Those sections/items of the test which are required to be flown by sole reference to
instruments will be simulated by using suitable equipment to simulate IMC.
Awareness of icing conditions must be displayed by regularly checking the outside air
temperature and carburettor heat where appropriate. The applicant should be able to use any
anti/de-icing equipment fitted to the aeroplane/helicopter. If actual ice is present the necessary
equipment or actions must be used. Training or preparation must ensure an operating
procedure for using aeroplane/helicopter icing equipment particularly with reference to pitot
heaters, carburettor heat, engine/propeller and airframe anti-icing. The aeroplane/helicopter
must not be flown deliberately into icing conditions if this is contrary to the
aeroplane/helicopter flight manual
The pre flight briefing may be given as one or more separate elements, as required, to give the
applicant the maximum opportunity to understand and prepare what is required of him.
The applicant should be given time and facilities to prepare for the test flight. The briefing
should cover the following:
(j) agreed speed and handling parameters (e.g., V-speeds, bank angle)
Examiner training must focus on the requirements to maintain the necessary level of
communication with the applicant. The following check details should be followed by the
examiner applicant:
(f) liaison with ATC and the need for concise, easily understood intentions
(g) prompting the ‘applicant’ regarding required sequence of events (e.g., following a
go- around)
The Examiner shall conduct each test/check in such a manner as to conform to the guidance
given by the Authority such that each applicant is allowed adequate time for the test, normally
not more than one hour.
Adequate Planning facilities must be available to the applicant. The examiner will check that
the applicant is aware of where resources are. A quiet briefing room should be used so that
the planning can be completed without interruption or distraction.
Planning shall be completed without assistance from other students or instructors. Current
ATC and Met information must be obtained. Any booking requirements should be made, by
the applicant, in adequate time for the flight.
A flight log should be prepared and the Examiner may request a copy. The log may include
such items as:
• Route (including flight to the planned alternate aerodrome)
• Communication and navaid frequencies (note that where this information is clearly
displayed on planning documents, such as the charts to be used, it is not necessary to
copy that information to the log)
• Timings, ETAs
• Fuel (showing contingency fuel and space to plot fuel remaining at way points)
The route may require flight through airspace other than Class G airspace and consideration
should be given to any special precautions during planning.
Planning and preparation must be completed by the crew using material acceptable to the
Authority. Computerised flight/navigation plans or aeroplane/helicopter mass and balance
calculations may be used during the allowed planning period. The applicant remains solely
responsible for all planning calculations.
Applicants will be required to calculate take off and landing performance for the conditions
prevailing, usually for the most limiting runway expected on the flight.
2.10 AIRMANSHIP
2.10.1 Definition
The complex of all resources (knowledge, attitude and skills) enabling the pilot to safely
handle his aeroplane/helicopter with due regard to rules and regulations, whatever the
circumstances, both on the ground and in the air. Human resources includes all other groups
routinely working with the pilot who are involved in decisions that are required to operate a
flight safely. These groups may include, but are not limited to: dispatchers, cabin
crewmembers, maintenance personnel and air traffic controllers. Airmanship is not a single
task but is a set of competencies, which must be evident in all tasks, conducted throughout the
practical test standard as applied to a skill test or proficiency check.
(a) Briefing
(b) Inquiry/Advocacy/Assertiveness
(c) Self-Criticism
(a) Preparation/Planning
(b) Vigilance
The majority of aviation accidents and incidents are due to poor resource management
failures by the pilot. Fewer are due to technical failures.
Pass/Fail judgements based solely on Airmanship issues must be carefully chosen since they
may be entirely subjective. It is not practical to give a comprehensive list of Airmanship
considerations, however, the 3 ‘cluster areas’ described above include items which the
applicant may forget to complete (e.g., correct radio calls) while others are an indication of
his capacity to deal with present or evolving flight conditions (e.g. poor spacing from other
aeroplane/helicopter or airspace awareness). It is, therefore, the examiner’s role to observe
how the applicant manages the resources available to him to achieve a safe and uneventful
flight. The examiner must be satisfied that the success of the flight was a result of good
airmanship and not good luck.
If the applicant shows early and consistent awareness of airmanship considerations (e.g.,
repetitive checking of icing conditions in a level cruise clear of icing conditions) the examiner
may allow the applicant to brief only changes during the remainder of the flight.
An examiner should maintain a flight log and assessment record during the test/check for
reference during the post/flight de-brief.
This record should be compiled without alerting or attracting the attention of the applicant
Except when the Examiner has to give guidance or a reminder, the applicant should be allowed
to conduct the flight without interruption. It should be remembered, however, that the
Examiner is responsible for the safe conduct of the flight and the prevention of any
infringements.
Each item within a test/check section should be completed and assessed separately. The
test/check schedule, as briefed, should not, normally, be altered by an examiner.
AMC FCL 1.425/2.425 paragraph 14
An examiner should verify the requirements and limitations of a test/check with an applicant
during the pre-flight briefing.
When a test/check is completed or discontinued, an examiner should de-brief the applicant and
give reasons for items/sections failed. In the event of a failed or discontinued skill test or
proficiency check, the examiner should provide appropriate advice to assist the applicant in re-
tests/re-checks.
Although test/checks may specify flight test tolerances, an applicant should not be expected to
achieve these at the expense of smoothness or stable flight. An examiner should make due
allowance for unavoidable deviations due to turbulence, ATC instructions, etc.
The examiner applicant should refer to the flight test tolerances given in (ANTR-FCL and
Module 5 for the appropriate test) Attention should be paid to the following points:
At the discretion of the examiner, any manoeuvre or procedure of the test/check may be
repeated once by the applicant. An examiner may terminate a test/check at any stage, if it is
considered that the applicant’s competency requires a complete re-test/re-check.
The examiner is to check ANTR-FCL references for pass fail criteria relevant to the test to
be conducted. In general, the guidance is:
For SPA: The applicant shall pass all sections of the skill test/proficiency check. If any item
in a section is failed, that section is failed. Failure in more than one section will require the
applicant to take the entire test/check again. Any applicant failing only one section shall take
the failed section again. Failure in any section of the re-test/re-check including those sections
that have been passed at a previous attempt will require the applicant to take the entire
test/check again.
For MPA: The applicant shall pass all sections of the skill test/proficiency check. Failure of
more than five items will require the applicant to take the entire test/check again. Any
applicant failing 5 or less items shall take the failed items again. Failure in any item on the re-
test/check including those items that have been passed at a previous attempt will require the
applicant to take the entire check/test again.
There are several methods for evaluating an applicant’s performance. Authorities may select
the method which they wish to use. Two methods will be considered here:
A Grading
B Objective Assessment
A Grading
Grading is an option on some forms used for tests/checks. However, its use is optional.
The “Acceptable Performance” section of each exercise outlines the grading criteria. These
criteria assume no unusual circumstances. Consideration shall be given to unavoidable
deviations from the published criteria due to weather, traffic or other situations beyond the
reasonable control of the applicant. To avoid the need to compensate for such situations, the
tests should be conducted under normal conditions whenever possible.
Description
Grade
5 The ideal performance under existing conditions. Anticipates and adapts easily to
changing or unusual flight situations.
4 Aim of exercise safely achieved with very few minor variations from ideal. Performance
shows smooth control of aeroplane/helicopter.
3 Aim of the exercise safely achieved with frequent minor but no major variations from the
ideal.
2 Aim of the exercise safely achieved. Performance includes not more than one major
variation from the ideal and may include frequent minor variations from the ideal.
1 Aim of exercise safely achieved in a rough manner. Performance includes more than one
major variation from the ideal and indicates a level of skill or knowledge, which results in
a marginally acceptable performance.
0 Any one of the following will result in an assessment of fail:
Written remarks are required when awarding a flight test exercise a mark of 2 or less. The
remarks should be clear and concise and in the case of an exercise assessed as:
Grades 1 or 2 reflect the major variation(s) from the Acceptable Performance for theexercise
as outlined in the appropriate flight test standards; or 0 reflect the appropriate item or items
that result in an assessment of fail as listed in the Grading Scale section of the flight test
Standard(s).
During a flight test, it is sometimes difficult to write clear and concise remarks. It is
recommended that examiners use notes made during the flight test to complete a final copy of
the Flight Test Report. This provides the examiner with the opportunity of referencing the
appropriate flight test standards while writing final comments.
The diagram shown below will assist the examiner in following a logical sequence of steps
to arrive at a mark when evaluating the applicant’s performance of a particular flight test item.
By starting at the top of the diagram and mentally reviewing and answering each question in
sequence, it is possible to arrive at a mark to be awarded. The accuracy of the assessment will
depend entirely on the examiner’s knowledge of the AcceptablePerformance requirements
for each flight test exercise and the Grading Scale.
YES
YES
YES
3 4
More than 1 Only 1
1 2
B Objective Assessment
The ability of an applicant to safely perform the required assignments is based on:
• Performing the assignments specified in the Examiner’s Manual for the licence
or rating sought within the approved standards
If a repeat item is not clearly satisfactory, the examiner shall consider it unsatisfactory
AEROPLANE
The examiner is to check ANTR-FCL references for pass fail criteria relevant to
Reference the test to be conducted. In general, the guidance is:
The applicant shall pass all sections of the skill test or proficiency check
Pass
Partial Pass For SPA: If any item in a section is failed, that section is failed. Any applicant
failing only one section shall take the failed section again. The applicant retaking
only that failed section, plus the departure section often completes the partial
pass. Should either of those two be failed at a second attempt then the result of
that test if a fail.
For MPA: Any applicant failing 5 or less items shall take the failed items again.
Fail For SPA: If any item in a section is failed, that section is failed. Failure in
more than one section will require the applicant to take the entire test/check again.
Failure in any section of the re-test/re-check including those sections that have
been passed at a previous attempt will require the applicant to take the entire
test/check again.
For MPA: The applicant shall pass all sections of the skill test/proficiency check.
Failure of more than five items will require the applicant to take the entire
test/check again. Failure in any item on the re-test/check including those items
that have been passed at a previous attempt will require the applicant to take
the entire check/test again.
i. the flight test tolerances have been exceeded after the examiner has
made due allowance for turbulence or ATC instructions;
ii. the aim of the test/check is not completed;
iii. the aim of exercise is completed but at the expense of unsafe flight,
violation of a rule or regulation, poor airmanship or rough handling;
iv. an acceptable level of knowledge is not demonstrated;
v. an acceptable level of flight management is not demonstrated; or
vi. the intervention of the examiner or safety pilot is required in the interest of
safety.
Incomplete Should an applicant choose not to continue a test/check for reasons considered
tests inadequate by an examiner, the applicant shall retake the entire skill test. If the
test/check is terminated for reasons considered adequate by the examiner, only
those items/sections not completed will be tested in a further flight.
HELICOPTER
The examiner is to check ANTR-FCL references for pass fail criteria relevant to
Reference the test to be conducted. In general, the guidance is:
Provided the applicant demonstrates the required level of knowledge,
Pass skill/proficiency and, where applicable, remains within the flight test tolerances for
the licence or rating
Partial Pass The partial pass is not always an option on test/check. However, when applicable
it is used to indicate that only one section of the test profile was failed. The
applicant retaking only that failed section, plus the departure section often
completes the partial pass. Should either of those two be failed at a second
attempt then the result of that test if a fail.
i. the flight test tolerances have been exceeded after the examiner has
made due allowance for turbulence or ATC instructions;
ii. the aim of the test/check is not completed;
iii. the aim of exercise is completed but at the expense of unsafe flight,
violation of a rule or regulation, poor airmanship or rough handling;
iv. an acceptable level of knowledge is not demonstrated;
v. an acceptable level of flight management is not demonstrated; or
vi. the intervention of the examiner or safety pilot is required in the interest of
safety.
Incomplete Should an applicant choose not to continue a test/check for reasons considered
tests inadequate by an examiner, the applicant shall retake the entire skill test. If the
test/check is terminated for reasons considered adequate by the examiner, only
those items/sections not completed will be tested in a further flight.
Post flight procedures will require accurate assessment of the flight and communication to
the applicant of his result. The examiner must:
• take the time necessary to consider a fair, unbiased and correct assessment of the
test/check
• deliver a clear decision on the result of the test/check with precise details of the
reason for each failed item indicating any fail result in a friendly but firm manner.
• where an existing rating has been failed instruct the applicant on the implications of
his result
Having completed the flight and the administration the examiner may then offer guidance on
any aspect of the flight.
If at any time during or after the test a complaint of a serious nature is made by an applicant
on the conduct of his test/check, the Examiner should not become involved in discussion with
the applicant. Complaints or appeals shall be dealt with according to BCAA policy.
MODULE 3
RESERVED
MODULE 4
RESERVED
MODULE 5
The nominated tolerances are extracted from ANTR-FCL with some additional figures for
standardisation and general guidance of examiners shown in italics.
Tolerance figures are to be used as the basis for assessment on the perfect day in an easily handled
aeroplane/helicopter. Since this combination is rare, the examiner shall make allowance for
turbulent conditions and the handling qualities and performance of the type ofaeroplane/helicopter
used.
Applicants may be advised that, during the flight, they should concern themselves only with flying
and operating the aeroplane/helicopter to the best of their ability and not attempt to remain within
the tolerances to the detriment of smooth handling.
5.1 AEROPLANE
Test tolerances - Refer to ANTR-FCL 1 for changes to this quick reference table
PROFILE PPL Skill CPL Skill IR, ATPL and all type or
Test Test class skill test and
proficiency checks
Altitude or Height (in feet)
Normal Flight 150 100 100
With simulated engine failure 200 150 100
Limited or partial panel 200 200
Starting go-around at decision alt/ht + 50 / - 0
(one engine inoperative
+ 100 / - 0)
Minimum descent altitude / height + 50 / - 0
(one engine inoperative
+100/ - 0)
Circling minima + 100 / - 0
Tracking
On radio aids 10 5 5
Precision approach half scale deflection
azimuth and glide path
DME arcing 1nm
Heading
All engines operating 10 10 5
With simulated engine failure 15 15 10
Limited or Partial panel 15 15
5.2 HELICOPTER
5.2.1 Quick reference:
Test tolerances - Refer to ANTR-FCL 2 for changes to this quick reference table
MODULE 6
A GUIDE TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE PPL SKILL TEST FOR THE TRAINING OF THE
FE FOR THE PPL
The following comments and information are offered to assist the examiner to conduct a thorough flight
test. These suggestions will aid in making accurate assessments of the applicant’s skill and knowledge.
All items of the skill test should be performed utilising the Flight Test Standards of Module 3/4 and
Tolerances of Module 5.
6.1 AEROPLANE
6.1.1 Quick Reference:
Who can test: FE, provided that they are individually authorised for this role
Examiners shall not test applicants to whom they have given flight instruction for
that licence, (Progress and Safety Checks do not count as flight instruction).
When an attempt is taken as two flights both parts are to be conducted by the
same examiner.
6.2 FOREWORD
Some items must be assessed through a dedicated exercice, for instance, item 2.h.i (stalling)
requires an airwork exercise as a medium. Other items are assessed without setting a particular
drill because:
• they can be assessed through the normal situations of the flight. For instance, items 2.c.ii
and 2.c.iii (climbing turns and levelling off) have a chance to be observable within the very
first minutes of the flight.
• they are assessed through the whole flight, or a portion of it. For instance, items 2.a or 3.h
(ATC liaison) or item 3.b maintaining altitude, heading and speed.
(a) Ensure that questions asked are relative to the aeroplane/helicopter being used for the
flight test.
(a) The applicant may use the Pilot Operating Handbook to determine information other than
essential performance speeds listed in the flight test standards as memory items.
(b) Record the answers given to questions regarding the best angle of climb speed, best rate of
climb speed, stall speed in the landing configuration and manoeuvring speed so that during
the flight test the actual speeds flown in the appropriate exercises may be compared.
Questions relating to the Pilot Operating Handbook should be “operational” questions,
particularly if the conditions of temperature wind strength; etc. existing at the time of flight
test can be utilised.
(a) Make this a practical exercise and relate the mass and balance problem to the proposed cross-
country flight. The applicant should also be asked to correct an out of CG situation, and
questioned to determine understanding of extreme CG locations and the resulting effect on
aeroplane/helicopter handling and performance.
(b) Should there be any doubt with regard to the completed mass and balance form presented
by an applicant, the level of knowledge should be determined by thorough questioning in
this area.
6.3.1.7 Taxiing
If the test is conducted under zero or light wind conditions, it is appropriate that, while taxiing, the
applicant be asked to demonstrate how the controls should be held under varying wind conditions,
for example cross wind, or a wind blowing from a front or rear quarter.
6.3.1.9Slow Flight
The aim of this exercise is to determine that the applicant can establish slow flight, control the
aeroplane/helicopter and return to normal airspeeds.
The applicant must be able to set the aeroplane in slow flight and change heading with appropriate
angle of bank and then resume normal flight, at all times keeping control (bank, speed, altitude,
slip). Failure to prevent a stall must be assessed as a fail.
6.3.1.10Stall
The examiner must be aware of the manufacturer’s recommendation in this regard for the type of
aeroplane to be used on the flight test. The FCL requirement is for a clean stall with a minimum loss
of altitude.
6.3.1.11 Takeoff
(a) It is suggested that the examiner does not request a specific take-off; rather it is
recommended a scenario be used so that the applicant is required to decide what procedure
to use.
(b) Aircraft configuration and airspeeds utilised should be those specified in the Pilot Operating
Handbook.
6.3.1.12 Circuit
If possible, it is recommended that both controlled and uncontrolled aerodromes be used during
the test if they are conveniently available in order to check that the appropriate procedures are
correctly utilised.
6.3.1.13 Approach and Landing
In assessing the ability to land within a pre-determined touchdown zone it is not intended that
examiners turn this item into a spot landing exercise, rather the applicant’s ability to land within a
specified portion of the runway is to be assessed. The overshoot will be assessed in conjunction with
this exercise.
(e) Determine the acceptability of the departure and destination runways under existing or
forecast conditions
When assigning the route, examiners should try to select a destination that will provide the
applicant with suitable terrain and sufficient en-route checkpoints.
The applicant’s completed calculations should be verified for accuracy.
6.3.2.2 Departure Procedure
Applicants are not restricted to just one method of departure. They have the option of determining
the appropriate departure procedure to use for the given location.
The assessment should be based on ability to adapt to the new circumstances and the manner in
which departure procedure is altered.
6.3.3 Enroute Procedure
With respect to time, if no suitable checkpoints are available, extra time should be allowed to enable
the applicant to determine if a track error exists. Proper selection of the assigned route should
prevent this situation.
(d) Examiners shall not use this exercise to set the applicant up for a contravention of the
regulations.
When tested at low level (reasonable height) the selected destination should not require the applicant
to over-fly populated areas en-route. Remember this is not a test of pure navigational skills but is
an assessment of ability to proceed to an alternate using mental dead reckoning and natural
geographic features such as roads, railway tracks etc., if they are available. Rulers, protractors, and
computers shall not be used for this procedure.
With respect to the estimated time of arrival, and the actual time of arrival at the alternate, no hard
numbers have been established as a criterion. Examiners may accept an estimated time of arrival
for this exercise which is reasonable, and which would ensure that the diversion could be conducted
as planned.
associated with the drill rather than assessing only a verbal statement of how things should
be done. Utilising this method should preclude an applicant from receiving a favourable
assessment based on the ability to recite an emergency drill when they in fact have no
understanding or appreciation of the action the drill requires.
(d) Examiners should not compound the requested emergencies, nor request so many that it
becomes an exercise in endurance until such time as the applicant gets a procedure wrong.
6.5 HELICOPTER
Quick reference:
MODULE 7
A guide for the examiner on the skill test for the CPL(A) and CPL(H)
All items of the skill test should be performed utilising the Flight Test Standards of Module 3/4
and Tolerances of Module 5.
7.1 AEROPLANE
Who can test: FE provided that they are individually authorised for this role
Examiners shall not test applicants to whom they have given flight instruction for
that licence, (Progress and Safety Checks do not count as flight instruction).
When an attempt is taken as two flights both parts are to be conducted by the
same examiner.
Applicants will be assessed on all aspects of the aeroplane operation. Sound basic handling skills
are essential as well as airmanship, navigation, instrument flying, correct R/T phraseology, cockpit
and overall flight management. The Examiner may elect to evaluate certain aspects by oral
questioning. The CPL Skill Test is divided into six main sections.
All sections of the test are to be completed in the course of one flight. The sequence of sections may
vary depending on circumstances and the Examiner’s briefing will include the expected profile.
Examiners are responsible for ensuring an efficient test but applicants must remain adaptable,
particularly if weather conditions, ATC 'slot' times etc., subsequently dictate a different scenario
during the flight.
Appendix 1 to ANTR-FCL 1.170 requires that the duration of the flight is to be at least 90
minutes. Section 3 normally takes about 1 hour and 15 minutes, and Sections 2 and 4 combined
about 1 hour. Section 5 may be combined, at the discretion of the Examiner, with Sections 1 through
4,and Section 6, where applicable, may be combined with Section 1 through 5. The wholetest could,
therefore, take up to 2 hours and 30 minutes.
The CPL Skill Test is very demanding. It is appreciated that even the most 'professional' or 'talented'
pilots can make mistakes. This does not necessarily mean that a failure should result.
The following notes reflect the style and sequence of the briefing that the applicant may expect to
hear. However, the examiner may make variations in the delivery of the briefing and may have to
modify the sequence in which items are briefed and flown.
From pre-flight to post-flight the applicant will be assessed on his general flight management and
flying skills.
7.3 SECTION 1
The applicant will be expected to carry out a safe and practical inspection of the aeroplane prior to
flight, and must be aware of the servicing operations that he is entitled to carry out on the aeroplane.
The applicant will be expected to proceed with the checks at a practical pace and with reference to
the checklist. Where visual checks are made these should be described to the Examiner only if
requested. Pre-flight checks of the radio and navigation equipment shouldinclude all the equipment
which the applicant proposes to use during the flight. The Examiner must be briefed, as a
passenger, on the position and method of the use of emergency exits, safety belts, safety harnesses,
oxygen equipment, life jackets, and all other devices intended for use by passengers in the case of
emergency. The applicant must instruct the Examiner on the actions he should take in the event of
an emergency. Passenger briefing cards are acceptable but the examiner may ask questions.
The applicant must be prepared to deal with actual or simulated Abnormal or Emergency Operations
at any stage. The Examiner may simulate, for example, an engine fire during start up.
The applicant is expected to take account of all factors that may affect a safe take-off and departure
7.4 SECTION 3
Section 3 is usually flown after Departure to ensure an efficient flow to the flight. During this section
of the flight the aeroplane is assumed to be on a passenger carrying operation under Visual Flight
Rules. When the aeroplane has achieved cruising altitude and is on heading for the turning point,
the applicant should confirm to the Examiner the heading, altitude, and ETA, thereafter advising
any changes, (for example, "2 minutes late at my halfway point - the revised ETA is now.
. ." etc).
Corrections to heading or ETA shall be calculated rather than based on track crawling, impulse or
inspiration. The applicant is expected to navigate by visual positioning in a practical way, not to
feature crawl. Numerous heading or altitude changes that are the result of poor flying may
constitute a fail in this section. The applicant is expected to make changes to his heading and ETA
in order to correct deviations from his plan.
Radio navigation aids may not be used during one leg of the en-route section. In order to assess
applicants ability to navigate by visual reference;
At some stage the applicant will be instructed to carry out a diversion from his planned track to an
alternative location. This is not an emergency procedure. A prominent location will be pin-pointed
on the applicant’s chart. The applicant may be asked to commence the diversion at or before a
planned turning point. The applicant should nominate his heading, altitude and ETA for the
diversion.
At some stage the Examiner will simulate poor weather by simulating IMC. The applicant should
take appropriate action to establish safe flight.
During the time under simulated IMC the applicant should continue to navigate and establish the
aeroplane's geographical position by using radio navigation techniques. The information may only
be obtained by VDF, VOR, DME, or ADF, GPS should not be used as a primary navigation aid.
When the examiner decides to return to VMC the applicant will be expected to fix his position
visually and continue to navigate to the diversion point using visual and radio aids fixing as required.
GPS (raw data latitude and longitude only) and RNAV may be used as aids to visual navigation, but
use of moving map displays is not acceptable.
Demonstration of radio aid tracking will be required at some stage; the Examiner will decide when
to ask for this exercise to ensure efficient use of time and airspace this exercises may be combined
with another section. He will nominate the NDB or VOR to be used and the track to be intercepted.
Throughout this section the applicant will be expected to demonstrate a satisfactory standard of
flight
7.5 SECTION 2
Throughout this section the Examiner will be responsible for navigation and ATC liaison, but the
applicant will be responsible for look out and collision avoidance (except when IMC is simulated).
The following items will be assessed in the visual and instrument sub-sections of Section 2.
(c) Turns, including turns in landing configuration; level steep turns at not less 45 than
bank; steep turns in a gliding configuration.
(d) Flight at critically high airspeeds (approaching VNE) and recognition of, and recovery from,
spiral dives. These manoeuvres are often combined; the Examiner may put the aeroplane
into a steep dive or a spiral dive with speed increasing rapidly and hand controlto the
applicant to initiate appropriate recovery action either to straight and level flight or into a
climb.
• The second stall will be from an approach configuration, (flap setting and gear) and
appropriate power. The stall should be initiated from a turn (level or descending with
about 20 AOB) and the applicant should recover at the first symptom of the
approaching stall.
• The third stall will be in a landing configuration and appropriate set power. The stall
should be initiated from straight flight as if established on final approach to land (i.e.
not climbing); the applicant must recover at the first symptom of the approaching
stall.
• All recoveries shall be made with the minimum loss of height and returning to a clean
climb, wings level.
Level flight in the cruise configuration. Level turns at rate one or bank angles up to 30. Climbing
and descending turns at given rates and speeds.
• Flight reference by turn and slip/turn coordinator indicator, standby compass and
performance instruments only
• Level turns onto given headings at rate one using timed or compass turns.
• Recovery from unusual attitudes. (Recovery should be made to trimmed straight and level
flight with minimum loss of height).
7.6 SECTION 4
This section may be flown at the base aerodrome or at an alternate aerodrome nominated by the
examiner before flight. Applicants will be expected to carry out a safe and expeditious join to the
circuit. This involves entry to the most convenient point in the circuit with the aeroplane in the
appropriate configuration and at the correct speed. Applicants will be expected to carry out a number
of approaches and landings (usually ‘touch and go’ landings) involving the following:
(d) Short field or Performance landing. This may be combined with a simulated bad
visibility/low level circuit. In order to assess this exercise the Examiner may limit the amount
of runway available.
(e) Approach and landing without the use of power (glide approach). The examiner may limit
the amount of runway available.
(g) Post flight action. The applicant will be responsible for taxiing and parking, after landing
and shut down checks, and the completion of aeroplane documentation.
Throughout this section the applicant is also responsible for ATC liaison, altimetry and lookout
7.7 SECTION 5
The items of this section may be combined with Sections 1 through 4. The Examiner will simulate
an abnormal or emergency situation; the applicant is expected to carry out the appropriate
emergency actions. If drills involve the operation of fuel cocks, fuel shut off valves, mixture controls
and any critical engine control, operations should be simulated by "touch actions" only. Emergency
radio calls should be made aloud but not transmitted. Applicants should not assume that any
simulated emergency is complete until told by the Examiner.
7.8 SECTION 6
Applicants attempting the Skill Test in a multi engine aeroplane (not centre-line thrust) will be
expected to fly the exercises in Section 6. At a safe height after take-off the Examiner will simulate
an engine failure by closing one of the throttles. The applicant will be expected to retain control of
the aeroplane, identify the ‘failed’ engine and carry out the appropriate engine shut down and
propeller feathering procedures; using touch drills. On completion of these drills, because the
applicant’s actions would have resulted in the engine security and propeller pitch being set as
required, the Examiner or the safety pilot will be responsible for setting zero thrust and the
management of the (simulated) failed engine.
The applicant will be expected to carry out a circuit to go-around under asymmetric power and an
asymmetric approach to land. This section may, at the discretion of the Examiner, be combined with
Sections 4 and 5 of the flight.
Applicants who are required to fly Section 6 will not be expected to fly the steep gliding turns in
Section 2, the glide approach in Section 4 or the practice forced landing and engine failure at section
5.
The simulator or FNPT II must be approved for the purpose and of the same aeroplane type/class
as used for the remainder of the skill test.
In situations when the Examiner does not occupy a pilot seat he is responsible for briefing the
safety pilot (Pilot in Command) on his duties throughout the test
7.10 HELICOPTER
MODULE 8
A guide to the structure of the IR skill test for the IRE and proficiency checks for the IRE and
CRE
All items of the skill test should be performed utilising the Flight Test Standards of Module 3/4
and Tolerances of Module 5.
8.1 AEROPLANE
8.2 GENERAL
The skill test and proficiency check will be performed according ANTR-FCL 1.210 and Appendix
1 to 1.210.
The duration of the total test/check might be at least 2 hours. All sections of the test/check are to
be completed in the course of the flight. The sequence of the sections may vary, depending of the
circumstances and the briefing of the examiner.
The weather minima for conducting the practical flight test/check for an IR(A) will be determined
by the Authority.
The aeroplane for the IR –Skill tests/Proficiency checks shall be suitably equipped to simulate
instrument meteorological conditions and suitably equipped for instrument flight training. (ANTR-
FCL Appendix 1a of 1.055).
An applicant shall fly the aeroplane/helicopter from a position where the pilot-in-command
functions can be performed and to carry out the test as if there is no other crew member. The FE
shall take no part in the operation of the aeroplane/helicopter, except when intervention isnecessary
in the interests of safety or to avoid unacceptable delay to other traffic. Whenever the examiner or
another pilot functions as a co-pilot during the test, the privileges of the instrument rating will be
restricted to multi-pilot operations. This restriction may be removed by the applicant carrying out
another initial instrument rating skill test acting as if there was no other crew member on a single-
pilot aeroplane/helicopter. Responsibility for the flight shall be allocated in accordance with
regulations.
The minimum flight crew necessary for the conduct of skill tests conducted as single pilot operations
must comprise of the applicant, the examiner and, if applicable, a Safety Pilot. The applicant shall
fly the aeroplane and will be acting as the Pilot in Command. If a safety pilot is required he/she will
be an instructor who is qualified to act as Pilot in Command on the aeroplane type or class being
used for the test and will be responsible as the Pilot in Commandfor the safety and general
operation of the aeroplane.
The Pre flight briefing should be according to Module 2 of this CAP. If the examiner will not occupy
a pilot seat during the test/check he must ensure that the Safety Pilot is briefed on the required
methods of:
The de-briefing and the assessment of the test will be according to Module 2 of this CAP.
The flight test items of the Skill Test/Proficiency check has to be performed according to the Flight
Test Standards in Module 3.
The Test Tolerances of Module 5 are used throughout the whole flight test. However, as the
circumstances of each test/check conducted by an examiner may vary, it is also important that an
examiner’s test/check assessment takes into account any adverse condition(s) encountered during
the test/check.
8.10 HELICOPTER
IR(H) REVALIDATION
ANTR reference : ANTR-FCL 2 Subpart F - Appendix 3 to ANTR-FCL 2.240
Revalidation: 12 months validity
The revalidation may be flown within 3 months of the due date, the new validity
being 12 months from that due date.
Who can test: TRE(H) with IR(H) privileges
Test format: As shown in Appendix 3 to ANTR-FCL 2.240
ANTR-FCL 2 recommends that the IR(H) be flown as an integral part of the pilot’s
annual SPH Type rating revalidation.
The examiner may repeat items in flight. If the final result is a failure the failed
item or items are, following any recommended mandatory retraining, to be
rechecked on a subsequent flight. However, the examiner may fail the whole of
the IR(H) revalidation if he considers it unacceptable, in which case the
whole of the IR(H) section is to be repeated, again after mandatory retraining is
completed
MODULE 9
A guide to the structure of the skill test for rating issue and the revalidation proficiency check for
the TRE and CRE
All items of the proficiency check test should be performed utilising the Flight Test Standards of
Module 3/4 and Tolerances of Module 5.
9.1 AEROPLANE
9.2 SPA
Appendix 3 to ANTR-FCL 1.240
Profiles are to be planned to make efficient use of time and airspace. The test and check profiles are
not dissimilar to those used for initial skill tests (PPL, CPL and IR). However, the examiner should
avoid wasting flight time beyond that required for the applicant to display the required skills and
should generally expect to be able to apply a practical approach to the test. The requirement of skills
tests is for the applicant to demonstrate his knowledge and handling of procedures in a new
environment. Proficiency checks should display the practical experience ofthe applicant with his
performance of the required items assessed against safe standards ofaeroplane handling and flight
management.
An examiner should plan a test/check flight so that the flight time in an aeroplane or ground time
in an approved STD is not less than 60 minutes.
For SPA, the single route sector in 1.245(b)(2), if applicable, shall be completed as part of the
proficiency check, in accordance to Appendix 3 to 1.240, item 4. For SE SPA, at least section 3A or
3B in the skill test/proficiency check shall always be completed.
For MPA, the single route sector may be included in the proficiency check, or completed separately
prior to the proficiency check within the validity period.
Items which may be trained and tested in an STD are identified in ANTR-FCL requirements.
STDs used are to have been approved for the purpose by the Authority. The device can be identified
by the examiner through its certificate, a unique authorisation number and validity.
9.5 MPA
MPA skill test and proficiency check the profiles may be conducted using the guidance in Module
10.
9.6 HELICOPTERS
Revalidation: IR(H) is valid only for helicopter type on which the skill test is completed.
MPH type rating and MPH IR(H) is not valid for SPH role on type and vice-
versa.
If the rating lapses by more than 5 years it shall be renewed by MPH IR(H)
renewal by an examiner of the authority and by skill test
If the rating lapses by more than 7 years the entire IR(H) Skill Test and the IR
Theoretical Knowledge exams shall be completed again.
MODULE 10
A guide to the structure of the ATPL skill test for the TRE.
All items of the skill test should be performed utilising the Flight Test Standards of Module 3/4
and Tolerances of Module 5.
10.1 AEROPLANE
Skill test and proficiency check for aeroplane type/class ratings and ATPL
TEST FORMAT
1 The applicant shall have completed the required instruction in accordance with the syllabus.
The administrative arrangements for confirming the applicant's suitability to take the test,
including disclosure of the applicant's training record to the examiner, shall be determined
by the Authority.
2 Items to be covered in skill tests are given in the applicable appendix 2 and 3 to ANTR- FCL
1.240. With the approval of the Authority, several different skill test scenarios may be
developed simulated line operations. The examiner will select one of these scenarios. Flight
simulators, if available and other training devices as approved shall be used.
(b) For MPA: The applicant shall pass all sections of the skill test/proficiency check.
Failure of more than five items will require the applicant to take the entire test/check
again. Any applicant failing 5 or less items shall take the failed items again. Failure
in any item on the re-test/check including those items that have been passed at a
previous attempt will require the applicant to take the entire check/test again.
(c) In case the applicant fails only or does not take Section 6, the type rating will be
issued without Cat II or III privileges.
4 Further training may be required after a failed test. Failure to achieve a valid pass in all items
in two attempts shall require further training as determined by the examiner. There isno limit
to the number of skill tests that may be attempted.
5 The Authority will provide the examiner with safety criteria to be observed in the conduct
of the test.
6 Should an applicant choose not to continue with a test for reasons considered inadequate
by the examiner, the applicant will be regarded as having failed those items not attempted.
If the test is terminated for reasons considered adequate by the examiner, only those items
not completed shall be tested in a further flight.
7 At the discretion of the examiner any manoeuvre or procedure of the test may be repeated
once by the applicant. The examiner may stop the test at any stage if it is considered that the
applicant's competency requires a complete re-test.
8 Checks and procedures shall be carried out/completed in accordance with the authorised
checklist for the aeroplane used in the test and, if applicable, with the MCC concept.
Performance data for take-off, approach and landing shall be calculated by the applicant in
compliance with the operations manual, or flight manual, for the aeroplane used. Decision
heights/altitude, minimum descent heights/altitudes and missed approach point shall be
determined by the applicant for the ATPL(A).
9 The test for a multi-pilot aeroplane shall be performed in a multi-crew environment. Another
applicant, or another pilot, may function as second pilot. If an aeroplane, rather than a
simulator, is used for the test/check, the second pilot shall be a TRI.
10 An applicant for the initial issue of an ATPL(A) shall be required to operate as 'pilot flying'
(PF) during all sections of the test ( in accordance with Appendix 2 to 1.240 &
1.295 ). The applicant shall also demonstrate the ability to act as 'pilot not flying' (PNF).
The applicant may choose either the left hand or the right hand seat for the test.
11 The following matters shall be specifically checked when testing applicants for the ATPL(A)
extending to the duties of a pilot-in-command, irrespective of whether theapplicant acts as
PF or PNF:
(c) setting priorities and making decisions in accordance with safety aspects and relevant
rules and regulations appropriate to the operational situation, including emergencies.
12 The test should be accomplished under IFR and as far as possible in a simulated commercial
air transport environment. An essential element is the ability to plan and conduct the flight
from routine briefing material.
(e) maintain control of the aeroplane at all times in such a manner that the successful
outcome of a procedure or manoeuvre is never in doubt;
The skill test contents and sections are set out in Appendix 2 to ANTR-FCL 1.240 & 1.295.
The format and application form to the skill test may be determined by the Authority, see IEM
FCL 1.240 (b)(1).
MODULE 11
All items of the skill test should be performed utilising the Flight Test Standards of Module
3/4 and tolerances of Module 5.
11.1 GENERAL
The skill test and proficiency check are to be performed according to ANTR-FCL 1.345/2.345
and 1.355/2.355(a) (3) set out in the Appendices 1 and 2 to ANTR FCL1.330/2.330 and
1.345/2.345. The test comprises oral theoretical examinations on theground, pre-flight and
post flight briefings and in-flight FI(A) demonstrations.
Section 3 Flight
Note that:
(a) A short lecture < 45 minutes, the subject selected from items 1-8 of Section 1, the
applicant being advised of the subject the previous day.
(b) An oral exam for knowledge of items 1-9 of Section 1 and the ‘teaching and
learning’ content given in the FI(A) courses.
• Section 4 is intentionally left blank on forms and is used for additional flight
instructor demonstrations, as decided by the examiner and acknowledged by
the applicant before the skill test.
• Section 5 will be used for a FI(A) rating for ME(SPA) or CRI (ME) (A).
All sections should be completed within a period of 6 months, however, if possible the
test/check should be completed in 1 day.
Failure in any exercise within Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 requires a re-test covering all
exercises. Section 1, if failed, may be retaken separately.
The weather minima for the FI/CRI/IRI skill test and proficiency check will be determined
by the Authority.
The aeroplane shall be suitably equipped to perform all the exercises and manoeuvres
required in the test/check.
The accommodation for the theoretical part of the test shall be a suitable location for giving
a test lecture to students.
The following books and documents should be available for the briefings and the flight:
• AIP
• AIC’s
• ANTR-FCL 1 or 2 as applicable
• Flight manuals
• Instructor guides
• Pilot licences
Appropriate literature/training aids representative of the test aeroplane should be used for
the lecture and briefings.
The aim of the oral examination is to determine the applicant’s knowledge of the following
subjects:
(e) Meteorology
(f) Navigation
(i) Administration
The oral examination will normally take 1 hour but is dependant on the both the type of test
and the applicant’s performance.
If the test is used for the issue or revalidation of an IRI, the questions should also focus on
instrument flying techniques, IR regulations and procedures.
If the test is used for the issue or revalidation of a FI(ME) or CRI(ME) specific questions
relating to asymmetric flight are to be asked.
The applicant is required to give a lecture under test conditions to his student ‘audience’,
one of whom will be the examiner.
• The subject of the lecture will be determined by the examiner and preferably chosen
from the exercises from AMC- FCL 1.340/2.340 for FI, AMC-FCL 1.380/2.380 for
CRI and AMC-FCL 1.395/2.395 for IRI or the training syllabus for PPL.
• The applicant will be given at least 24 hours notice of the lecture topic and time to
prepare himself for its delivery on the day.
• The examiner, acting as a student, should clearly explain which level he must be
considered as a student.
• Applicants must expect to use whatever training aids and equipment are available.
1. The Aim
• no untrue statements
• explanation of airmanship
During the lecture the applicant will be assessed by the examiner on the following items:
• Visual presentation
• Technical accuracy
• Clarity of explanation
• Clarity of speech
• Instructional techniques
• Student participation
An exercise will be chosen by the examiner from the flight syllabus of the FI training course
(see AMC-FCL 1.340/2.340, 1.380/2.380 and 1.395/2.395)
The pre flight briefing should be a short practical briefing of about 15 to 20 minutes.
The examiner should explain that throughout the flight he, or another FI, will act as the
student. The level of experience of this student is to be clearly identified.
The assessment of the pre flight briefing will be in accordance with the assessment items of
paragraph 11.3, above.
The flight test following the pre flight briefing should last at least 60 minutes.
The chosen exercise briefed during the pre flight briefing should be the main exercise of the
flight.
Before the flight the examiner should clearly identify:
• which exercises may be demonstrated to the student but with accompanying ‘patter’.
During the skill test the applicant shall occupy the seat normally occupied by the FI. The
examiner, acting as a student, must act according to the instructions given by the applicant.
The examiner should not deliberately set traps, but act as a normal student and introduce
common student errors for the applicant to identify and correct. It is also important that the
examiner is consistent in his response, so that mistakes mastered by the applicant, no longer
occur.
The applicant will be expected to demonstrate personal standards of flying ability and
airmanship to the level of a professional pilot.
• Arrangement of Demo
• Correction of Faults
• Aeroplane Handling
• Instructional Technique
Assessment of the post flight briefing will be according the items of paragraph 11.3, above.
The applicant’s knowledge of check items flown during the flight test are to be assessed
against the relevant Flight Test Standards in Module 3 of this CAP
The test tolerances for CPL, shown at Module 5 of this CAP, are to be used for assessment
of the FI applicant. However, as the circumstances of each test/check may vary, it is also
important that the examiner’s assessment takes into account any adverse conditions
encountered during the flight.