0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views7 pages

Quiz 1

1. The function has a limit of 0 as x approaches 0 from both sides, but does not have a limit as x approaches 0, so the limit does not exist. 2. The function has exactly two real zeros. 3. The function is differentiable at x=0 when A=0.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views7 pages

Quiz 1

1. The function has a limit of 0 as x approaches 0 from both sides, but does not have a limit as x approaches 0, so the limit does not exist. 2. The function has exactly two real zeros. 3. The function is differentiable at x=0 when A=0.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Summer 2023 Calculus I – Quiz 1

1. Evaluate lim f(x), where


x→0

sin(π/2x) if x = 1/n for some non-zero integer n,
f(x) =
x∥1/x∥ otherwise.

Here, ∥x∥ denotes the integer closest to x.

DNE since x ⌊1/x⌋ = 1 − x{1/x} → 1 as x → 0 by sandwich theorem. On the other hand,


every interval around 0 contains infinitely many reciprocals of integers at which the
function assumes the value 0, ±1.

2. Find the number of distinct real zeros (roots) of f(x) = 2x4 + x2 + 4x − 2.

f(−2), f(1) > 0 and f(0) < 0. Since f is continuous, it has at least 2 roots by IVT.

f ′ = 8x3 + 2x + 4, f ′′ (x) = 24x2 + 2 > 0.


By MVT, f ′′ > 0 implies f ′ is increasing. This means f ′ can have at most 1 zero. Since
f ′ (0) > 0 and f ′ (−1) < 0, it does have a zero in (−1, 0) by IVT. This shows f ′ has exactly
one root. By MVT again, it follows that f has at most 2 roots. Therefore, f has exactly
two roots.

1
3. Find A for which


 1 − cos x if x ̸= 0
f(x) = 2 − cos(1/x)

 A if x = 0.

is differentiable at x = 0.

Taking A = 0 and using sandwich theorem, it follows that f ′ (0) exists since 1/(2 −
cos(1/x)) is bounded.

4. Why is the following argument incomplete?

There is no function g(x) defined on R whose derivative equals



x if x ⩾ 0
f(x) =
1 − x if x < 0,
since

x2 /2 if x ⩾ 0
g(x) = 2
x − x /2 if x < 0.

is defined for all x, but g ′ (x) ̸= f(x) for x = 0.

Correct this argument using Darboux’s Theorem, which states that if f ′ is defined for all x in [a, b],
then it has the intermediate value property (IVP) on [a, b].

This shows that one particular choice of g given above fails the claim. One should show
that no g has the property that g ′ = f for all x. The correct version should be
There is no function g whose derivative equals f(x) since f(x) does not have IVP
on, say, [−1/2, 1/2].

2
5. True or False? (Explain in either case)

f(1 + h2 ) − f(1)
(a) If lim exists, then f ′ (1) exists.
h→0 h
False. Take f = |x|.

(b) If lim f(x4 − x2 ) exists, then so does lim f(x).


x→0 x→0

False since x − x → 0 as x → 0. Take f = |x|/x for example.


4 2 −

(c) If lim f(x) exists, then so does lim f(xsin(1/x)).


x→0 x→0

False. Take f(x) = 0 for x ̸= 0 and f(0) = 1.

(d) If f ′ (−1) < 0 and f ′ (1) > 0, then f ′ (c) = 0 for some c ∈ (−1, 1).
False. Take f = |x|.

(e) There is a function f defined on R, is discontinuous at every point, yet f(x)(1 − f(x)) is
differentiable everywhere.
f = 1 on Q and 0 otherwise.

(f) There is a function f defined on R, is discontinuous at every point, yet f2 (x) is differentiable
everywhere.
f = -1 on Q and 1 otherwise.

(g) There is a function f differentiable on R, yet f ′ (x) is not continuous at least for one x ∈ R.
f = x2 sin(1/x) for x ̸= 0, and f(0) = 0.

3
6. Find the points on x3 y + y4 = x2 where the tangent is horizontal.

Differentiating wrt x gives

2 x − 3x 2 y
3x2 y + x3 y ′ + 4y3 y ′ = 2x =⇒ y ′ = =0
x3 + 4y3

if 2x = 3x2 y. If x = 0 then y = 0, hence y ′ is not defined. Hence x ̸= 0 and we get


y = 2/3x and inserting this in the given equation we get
r
2x2 16 16 6 16 2
+ 4
= x2 =⇒ x6 = =⇒ x = ± ,y = .
3 81x 27 27 3x

4
7. Find the indicated asymptotes of f(x). (Need to prove your claims.)
x(x − 3)
(a) √ , vertical, horizontal, slant.
x2 − x
Vertical at 1 since
√ √
(x − 3) x −x(x − 3)
lim f = lim+ √ = −∞, lim− f = lim− √ = 0,
x→1+ x→1 x−1 x→0 x→0 1−x
and slant at ±∞ since
f x(1 − 3/x)
lim = lim = ±1,
x→±∞ |x| 1 − 1/x
p
x→±∞ x

and
 x−3   1 − 3/x 
lim (f − ±x) = lim x √ ∓ 1 = lim x ± p ∓1
x→±∞ x→±∞ x2 − x x→±∞ 1 − 1/x
 1 − 3/x 
= ± lim x p −1
x→±∞ 1 − 1/x
p
1 − 3/x − 1 − 1/x 1
= ± lim ·p
x→±∞ 1/x 1 − 1/x

1 − 3x − 1 − x 1
= ± lim · lim p
x→0 x−0 x→±∞ 1 − 1/x
 1  5
= ± −3 + √ =∓ .
2 1 − x x=0 2

Slant asymptotes can be written as |x − 5/2|.

(x − 1)(x − 3)
(b) √ , vertical
x2 − x
Only at x = 0 since

(x − 3) x − 1
lim f = lim+ √ = 0, lim f = +∞.
x→1+ x→1 x x→0−

5

(x − 3) x − 1
(c) √ , vertical, horizontal, slant
x3 + x
No vertical since no zeros in the denominator in [1, ∞), horizontal is y = 1 at ∞ since
p
(1 − 3/x) 1 − 1/x
lim f = lim p = 1.
x→∞ x→∞ 1 + 1/x2


(d) x2 − 3x + 1, slant
Slant are y = |x − 3/2| at ±∞ since

lim (f − |x − 3/2|) = lim (x − 3/2)2 + 1 − 9/4 − |x − 3/2|


p 
x→±∞ x→±∞
q
1 − 4(x−53/2)2 − 1
= lim
x→±∞ 1/|x − 3/2|
p
1 − 5x2 /4 − 1 dp
= lim = 1 − 5x2 /4 = 0.
x→0 x dx x=0

6

3
(e) x3 − x2 − x + 1, slant
Slant at ±∞ is y = x − 1/3 since

f p
lim = lim 3 1 − 1/x − 1/x2 + 1/x3 = 1,
x→±∞ x x→±∞

and
f3 − x3 −1 − 1/x + 1/x2 1
lim (f − x) = lim 2 2
= lim 2
=− .
x→±∞ x→±∞ f + xf + x x→±∞ (f/x) + f/x + 1 3

x5 − x4 − 19x3 + 13x2 + 78x − 72


(f) , vertical
x2 − 1
Note that
x4 − 19x2 − 6x + 72
f(x) =
x+1
̸ 1. Since the numerator is not zero at x = −1, f(x) tends to ±∞ as x → −1± .
for x =
Thus , f has vertical asymptote only at x = −1.

You might also like