Chapter 02 - Making Decisions - Marab
Chapter 02 - Making Decisions - Marab
Maliha Rabeta
Lecturer
Department of Business Administration in
Finance and Banking
BUP
16 January 2023
WHAT IS A DECISION?
Decision
Making a choice from two or more alternatives.
The Decision-Making Process
Identifying a problem and decision criteria and allocating weights to the criteria.
Developing, analyzing, and selecting an alternative that can resolve the problem.
Implementing the selected alternative.
Evaluating the decision’s effectiveness.
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
STEP 1: IDENTIFY A PROBLEM
Characteristics of Problems
The manager must have the authority, information, or resources needed to solve the
problem.
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
STEP 2: IDENTIFY THE DECISION CRITERIA
Decision criteria are factors that are important to resolving the problem.
Once a manager has identified a problem, he or she must identify the decision
criteria important or relevant to resolving the problem. Every decision-maker has
criteria guiding his or her decisions even if they’re not explicitly stated.
In this example, Amanda decides after careful consideration that memory and storage
capabilities, display quality, battery life, warranty, and carrying weight are the relevant
criteria in her decision.
STEP 2: IDENTIFYING DECISION CRITERIA
Decision criteria are factors that are important (relevant) to resolving the problem. E.g.:
Costs that will be incurred (investments required)
Risks likely to be encountered (chance of failure)
Outcomes that are desired (growth of the firm)
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
STEP 3: ALLOCATE WEIGHTS TO THE CRITERIA
If the relevant criteria aren’t equally important, the decision maker must weight the
items in order to give them the correct priority in the decision.
• A simple way is to give the most important criterion a weight of 10 and then assign
weights to the rest using that standard. Of course, you could use any number as the
highest weight.
IMPORTANT DECISION CRITERIA
Criterion Weight
Battery life 8
Carrying weight 6
Warranty 4
Display quality 3
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
STEP 4: DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES
• Here the decision maker needs to be creative, and the alternatives are only
listed—not evaluated
POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES
Laptop Memory and Battery Carrying Warranty Display
Storage Life Weight Quality
HP ProBook 10 3 10 8 5
Lenovo IdeaPad 8 5 7 10 10
Apple MacBook 8 7 7 8 7
Toshiba Satellite 7 8 7 8 7
Dell Inspirion 10 7 8 6 7
HP Pavilion 4 10 4 8 10
STEP 5: EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
HP Pavilion 40 80 24 32 30 206
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
STEP 6: SELECT AN ALTERNATIVE
• By Conveying the decision to those affected and get their commitment to it.
• We know that if the people who must implement a decision participate in the
process, they’re more likely to support it.
Evaluate the result or outcome of the decision to see if the problem was resolved.
• Was the problem incorrectly defined? Were errors made when evaluating
alternatives? Was the right alternative selected but poorly implemented?
• The answers might lead you to redo an earlier step or might even require starting the
whole process over.
DECISIONS MANAGERS MAY MAKE: PLANNING AND ORGANIZING
DECISIONS MANAGERS MAY MAKE: LEADING AND CONTROLLING
RATIONALITY
Rational Decision-Making: choices that are logical and consistent and maximize value
Assumptions of rationality:
Rational decision maker is logical and objective
Problem faced is clear and unambiguous
Decision maker would have clear, specific goal and be aware of all alternatives and consequences
The alternative that maximizes achieving this goal will be selected
Decisions are made in the best interest of the organization
Bounded Rationality
Managers make decisions rationally, but are limited (bounded) by their ability to
process information.
Escalation of Commitment
Intuitive decision-
making: making decisions
on the basis of experience,
feelings, and accumulated
judgment
Structured Problems
Involve goals that clear.
Are familiar (have occurred before).
Are easily and completely defined—information about the problem is available and
complete.
Programmed Decision
A repetitive decision that can be handled by a routine approach.
E.g., registration process.
TYPES OF PROGRAMMED DECISIONS
A Policy
A Procedure
A series of interrelated steps that a manager can use to respond (applying a policy) to
a structured problem.
Purchasing procedures.
Recruitment procedures.
Registration procedures.
TYPES OF PROGRAMMED DECISIONS
A Rule
An explicit statement that limits what a manager or employee can or cannot do in
carrying out the steps involved in a procedure. Examples:
Reviewing marks can be within the first week of publishing final results.
PROBLEMS AND DECISIONS (CONT’D)
Unstructured Problems
Problems that are new or unusual and for which information is ambiguous or incomplete.
Non-programmed Decisions
E.g., making a decision regarding opening a second branch in a new geographical area.
few decisions in the real world are either fully programmed or non-programmed
TYPES OF PROBLEMS, TYPES OF DECISIONS, AND LEVEL IN THE
ORGANIZATION
PROGRAMMED VS NONPROGRAMMED DECISIONS
Certainty: a situation in which a manager can make accurate decisions because all outcomes are
known. E.g., putting a deposit in a bank, the annual return on it is known. The outcomes of each
alternative is certain. As you might expect, most managerial decisions aren’t like this.
• Risk: A situation in which the decision maker is able to estimate the likelihood of certain outcomes.
The decision maker is able to estimate the likelihood of certain outcomes. Under risk, managers have
historical data from past personal experiences or secondary information that lets them assign
probabilities to different alternatives.
• Uncertainty: a situation in which a decision maker has neither certainty nor reasonable probability
estimates available. Managers face decision-making situations of uncertainty. Under these conditions,
the choice of alternative is influenced by the limited amount of available information and by the
psychological orientation of the decision maker.
MANAGING RISK
Under risk, managers have historical data from past personal experiences or
secondary information that lets them assign probabilities to different alternatives.
This is used to calculate expected value—the expected return from each possible
outcome—by multiplying expected revenue by the probability of each alternative
EXPECTED VALUE
Uncertainty is a situation in which the decision maker has neither certainty nor
reasonable probability estimates available.
a. The choice of alternative is influenced by the limited amount of information available.
b. It’s also influenced by the psychological orientation of the decision maker.
1) An optimistic manager will follow a maximax choice (maximizing the maximum possible
payoff).
2) A pessimistic one will pursue a maximin choice (maximizing the minimum possible
payoff).
3) The manager who desires to minimize the maximum regret will opt for a minimax
choice/regret.
Uncertainty
Maximax: the optimistic manager’s choice to maximize the maximum payoff. E.g.,
S4=
Maximin: the pessimistic manager’s choice to maximize the minimum payoff. E.g.,
S3=
Minimax: the manager’s choice to minimize his maximum regret. E.g., S4=
PAYOFF MATRIX
A marketing manager at Visa has determined four possible strategies (Strategy 1, Strategy 2, Strategy 3, and
Strategy 4) for promoting the Visa card throughout the West Coast region of the United States. The
marketing manager also knows that major competitor MasterCard has three competitive actions (CA 1, CA
2, and CA 3) it’s using to promote its card in the same region. For this example, we’ll assume that the Visa
manager had no previous knowledge that would allow her to determine probabilities of success of any of the
four strategies. She formulates the matrix shown above to show the various Visa strategies and the resulting
profit, depending on the competitive action used by MasterCard.
REGRET MATRIX
Managers calculate regret by subtracting all possible payoffs in each category from the maximum possible payoff
for each given event, in this case for each competitive action. For our Visa manager, the highest payoff—given that
MasterCard engages in CA1, CA2, or CA3—is $24 million, $21 million, or $28 million, respectively (the highest
number in each column). Subtracting the payoffs in previous slide from those figures produces the results shown in
this slide.
HEURISTICS
Choosing alternatives that offer immediate rewards and that to avoid immediate
costs.
DECISION-MAKING BIASES AND ERRORS (CONT’D)
Framing Bias
Selecting and highlighting certain aspects of a situation while ignoring other
aspects. E.g., focus on revenue and ignore maintenance skills.
Availability Bias
Losing decision-making objectivity by focusing on the most recent events.
DECISION-MAKING BIASES AND ERRORS (CONT’D)
Representation Bias
Drawing analogies/likeness and seeing identical situations when none exist.
E.g., considers last summer revenue the same for this year.
Randomness Bias
Creating unfounded meaning out of random events. E.g., event happened by
chance. E.g., making high profit because of having high stock of paints and
Israel prevented paints from entry.
DECISION-MAKING BIASES AND ERRORS (CONT’D)
Sunk Costs Errors
Forgetting that current actions cannot correct past events and relate only to future
consequences.
Self-Serving Bias
Taking quick credit for successes and blaming outside factors for failures.
Hindsight/observation Bias
Mistakenly believing that an event could have been predicted once the
actual outcome is known (after-the-fact). E.g., let us start producing and will
see the customer reaction.
OVERVIEW OF MANAGERIAL DECISION MAKING
Big data: the vast amount of quantifiable data that can be analyzed by highly sophisticated data
processing
One IT expert described big data with “3V’s: high volume, high velocity, and/or high variety information
assets.”
With this type of data at hand, decision makers have very powerful tools to help them make decisions.
Experts caution that collecting and analyzing data for data’s sake is wasted effort. Goals are needed
when collecting and using this type of information.
Big data, no matter how comprehensive or well analyzed, needs to be tempered by good judgment.
For instance, a recent government report states: “Companies should remember that while big data is
very good at detecting correlations, it does not explain which correlations are meaningful.”
LINEAR-NONLINEAR THINKING STYLE
Ways of thinking