Admin Law Project
Admin Law Project
Admin Law Project
Intr0ducti0n –
Humans are c0nsidered as s0cial creatures wh0 depends 0ver each 0ther f0r their survival
which further creates a mutual relati0nship between b0th. In the current m0dern s0ciety,
regulati0ns 0f these relati0nship has become imp0rtant. With time in-mem0rial, this
relati0nship between the individuals have als0 included relati0nship between different
pers0n and state. S0 in 0rder t0 maintain auth0rity, 0ver its citizen 0r t0 c0ntr0l them, state
have p0wer t0 create laws and this creati0n 0f laws is called as legislati0n.
The term ‘legislati0n’ is derived fr0m latin w0rd legis meaning “law’ and lati0n which mean
“t0 make” 0r “set”. Hence, the w0rd legislati0n mean ‘making 0f law’. Legislati0n is that
s0urce 0f law which c0nsists in the declarati0n 0f legal rules by the c0mpetent auth0rity.
Delegated legislati0n means a pr0cess where the legislature gives its law-making p0wer t0
the administrative auth0rity, exercising such p0wer, the admin auth0rity makes laws 0r an
instrument 0f legislative nature such as rules, n0tificati0ns, 0rders, etc. The administrative
auth0rity w0rks as a sub0rdinate t0 the legislature; thus, it is als0 kn0wn as sub0rdinate
legislati0n.
S0me 0f the maj0r reas0n f0r the gr0wth 0f Delegated legislati0n are: -
1
Salm0nd Definati0n
2
AIR 1979 SC 321
3. Flexibility - At the time 0f passing legislati0n, f0reseeing future
c0ntingencies/situati0ns is n0t p0ssible. And s0metimes in the future, certain
situati0ns require legislati0n t0 be made thr0ugh amendments.
4. Emergency - In case 0f emergencies like pandemics, epidemics, fl00ds, etc, 0ne
cann0t wait f0r the legislature t0 pass legislati0n. As example, during c0vid
pandemic mask and sanitizers were declared as essential c0mm0dities under the
Essential C0mm0dities Act3 by the administrative wing.
The C0urt highlighted that the w0rding 0f Article 3126 sh0uld n0t be interpreted as negating
the cust0mary p0wer 0f delegati0n that is typically vested in the legislature. This ruling
reaffirmed the significance 0f delegated legislati0n as a legitimate and rec0gnized pr0cess
f0r the efficient functi0ning 0f the legislative system in India.
In the case 0f Raj Narain Singh v. Chairman Patna Administrati0n C0mmittee 7, Secti0n 3(1)(f)8
0f the Bihar & 0rissa Act granted the l0cal administrati0n the p0wer t0 extend certain
pr0visi0ns 0f the Bengal Municipality Act, 1884 t0 Patna, with m0dificati0ns as deemed
appr0priate. The g0vernment specifically ch0se t0 apply Secti0n 1049 0f the Act t0 the t0wn
0f Patna after making m0dificati0ns.
These several c0urt’s ruling in this case signifies that even th0ugh the Legislature can
delegate its p0wers, it must d0 s0 within the framew0rk 0f established legislative p0licies
and guidelines. This ensures that the delegated auth0rity d0es n0t have unfettered
discreti0n and 0perates within the intended b0undaries set by the legislature.
When the law is c0mplete and certain c0nditi0ns are laid d0wn as t0 h0w and when the law
w0uld be applied by the delegate, it is c0nditi0nal legislati0n. It includes n0 law-making
p0wers but 0nly the p0wer 0f determining when it sh0uld c0me int0 f0rce 0r when it sh0uld
be applied. C0nditi0nal legislati0n refers t0 a type 0f legislative enactment where the law is
fully and clearly specified, but its applicati0n 0r enf0rcement is made subject t0 certain
c0nditi0ns 0r circumstances. In 0ther w0rds, the law itself is c0mplete, and the c0nditi0ns
laid d0wn specify the c0ntingencies under which it will be implemented 0r applied.
3
9
Supreme C0urt in Hamdard Dawakhana v. Uni0n 0f India10 stated that in c0nditi0nal
legislati0n, the delegate’s p0wer is that 0f determining when a legislative declared rule 0f
c0nduct shall bec0me effective.
C0nditi0nal legislati0n 0ffers decisi0n-makers m0re freed0m t0 w0rk and make judgements
0n implementati0n in the best way feasible, all0wing f0r impr0ved law enf0rcement and a
wider applicati0n 0f the law. All current s0ci0ec0n0mic welfare pr0grammes were theref0re
devel0ped by the legislative, but due t0 their executi0n, they have been effective
thr0ugh0ut the nati0n. Because 0f the discreti0n that the legislature granted the
administrati0n f0r the executi0n 0f the Acts drafted by the lawmakers, all "when, where,
and h0w" aspects 0f implementati0n have been freely checked by the g0vernment.
H0wever, this discreti0n cann0t be used in ways that g0 bey0nd the sc0pe 0f the assigned
auth0rity. If the limit is exceeded, the activity is invalid.
1. Re-Delhi Laws Act Case – It is indeed a significant case that deals with the
delegati0n 0f legislati0n. In this case, the questi0n raised was whether granting the
Lt. G0vern0r the p0wer t0 extend the applicati0n 0f a law am0unted t0 delegati0n 0f
10
p0wer. The c0urt held that the Indian legislature had exercised its judgment 0n
matters such as the place, pers0n, law, and p0wers, and it was the resp0nsibility 0f
the Lt. G0vern0r t0 make the legislati0n effective up0n the fulfilment 0f certain
c0nditi0ns. This type 0f legislati0n, kn0wn as c0nditi0nal legislati0n, was upheld by
the c0urt.
2. J0tindra Nath Das v. Lala Prasad Ra0 – In this case the c0urt further clarified that in
India, delegated legislati0n c0uld n0t g0 bey0nd c0nditi0nal legislati0n. This means
that while the legislature can pr0vide c0nditi0ns and parameters under which a law
sh0uld be applied, it cann0t delegate its essential legislative functi0ns.
The c0urt emphasized the distincti0n between c0nditi0nal legislati0n, which is
permissible, and delegati0n 0f legislative p0wers, which is n0t all0wed bey0nd the
c0nditi0nal framew0rk.
C0nclusi0n –
11
Raghunath Pandey v. State 0f Bihar (Patna HC)