Review

Microalgae Polysaccharides: An Overview of Production,

Characterization, and Potential Applications
Jorge Alberto Vieira Costa 1, *, Bárbara Franco Lucas 1 , Ana Gabrielle Pires Alvarenga 2 , Juliana Botelho Moreira 2
and Michele Greque de Morais 2

1 Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Food Engineering, Federal University of
Rio Grande, P.O. Box 474, Rio Grande 96203-900, RS, Brazil; [email protected]
2 Laboratory of Microbiology and Biochemistry, College of Chemistry and Food Engineering, Federal
University of Rio Grande, P.O. Box 474, Rio Grande 96203-900, RS, Brazil;
[email protected] (A.G.P.A.); [email protected] (J.B.M.);
[email protected] (M.G.d.M.)
* Correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract: Microalgae and cyanobacteria are photosynthetic microorganisms capable of synthesizing

several biocompounds, including polysaccharides with antioxidant, antibacterial, and antiviral prop-
erties. At the same time that the accumulation of biomolecules occurs, microalgae can use wastewater
and gaseous effluents for their growth, mitigating these pollutants. The increase in the production of
polysaccharides by microalgae can be achieved mainly through nutritional limitations, stressful condi-
tions, and/or adverse conditions. These compounds are of commercial interest due to their biological





 and rheological properties, which allow their application in various sectors, such as pharmaceuticals
and foods. Thus, to increase the productivity and competitiveness of microalgal polysaccharides with
Citation: Costa, J.A.V.; Lucas, B.F.;
commercial hydrocolloids, the cultivation parameters and extraction/purification processes have
Alvarenga, A.G.P.; Moreira, J.B.; de
been optimized. In this context, this review addresses an overview of the production, characterization,
Morais, M.G. Microalgae
Polysaccharides: An Overview of
and potential applications of polysaccharides obtained by microalgae and cyanobacteria. Moreover,
Production, Characterization, and the main opportunities and challenges in relation to obtaining these compounds are highlighted.
Potential Applications. Polysaccharides
2021, 2, 759–772. https://doi.org/ Keywords: cyanobacteria; exopolysaccharides; functional activities; microalgal cultivation; nutrient
10.3390/polysaccharides2040046 limitation; rheological properties

Academic Editors: Cédric Delattre,

Paolina Lukova and Guillaume Pierre
1. Introduction
Received: 25 August 2021
Microalgae and cyanobacteria are photosynthetic microorganisms that have been
Accepted: 23 September 2021
attracting attention due to their versatility in producing biomass that can be transformed
Published: 1 October 2021
into several products of high commercial value. These organisms can produce compounds
including polysaccharides with antioxidant, antibacterial, and antiviral properties [1–4].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
Porphyridium sp. [5], Chlorella sp. [2], Spirulina sp. [3], and Nostoc sp. [6] have been studied
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
to produce polysaccharides.
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Microalgal polysaccharides are described as being mainly heteropolysaccharides gen-
erally related to other components such as sulfates [7,8]. The synthesis and production of
polysaccharides is a complex process, and their composition will depend on the microalgae
strain and cultivation conditions such as the availability of nutrients, salinity, irradiance,
and temperature. The extraction and purification of polysaccharides must be carried out
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
aiming to reach high yields, without any other compounds, such as salts and proteins.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Optimization of the steps from the cultivation of microalgae to polymer obtention have
This article is an open access article
been studied by several researchers, aiming to achieve higher process yields [5,9].
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Among the polysaccharides from microalgae, exopolysaccharides are highlighted [10].
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
Microalgal exopolysaccharides can be found solubilized in medium (released polysac-
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ charides) or attached to cells (cell-bound polysaccharides) [5,11]. During microalgae
4.0/). cultivation, greater exopolysaccharide accumulation can be achieved by applying nitrogen

Polysaccharides 2021, 2, 759–772. https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides2040046 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/polysaccharides

 cultivation, greater exopolysaccharide accumulation can be achieved by applying nitro-
gen limitation. The application of microalgae exopolysaccharides has surpassed the re-
search phase, being currently applied in cosmetics [10,12]. Within this context, this review
aims to provide an overview of the production, characterization, and potential applica-
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 760
tions of polysaccharides obtained from microalgae and cyanobacteria. Furthermore, the
main opportunities and challenges concerning obtaining these biocompounds are high-
lighted.
limitation. The application of microalgae exopolysaccharides has surpassed the research
phase, being currently applied in cosmetics [10,12]. Within this context, this review aims
2. Polysaccharides from Microalgae
to provide an overview of the production, characterization, and potential applications
of polysaccharides
Microalgae obtained from
are organisms thatmicroalgae
have been and cyanobacteria.
used for decades Furthermore,
as a sourcetheof main
nutrients by
opportunities and challenges concerning obtaining these biocompounds are highlighted.
humans and animals. These microorganisms also contribute to mitigating negative im-
pacts2. on the environment
Polysaccharides caused by non-environmentally friendly technologies [1,13]
from Microalgae
The main Microalgae are organisms that have been used foris
advantage of microalgae/cyanobacteria the possibility
decades as a source of them being
of nutrients by culti-
vated usingand
humans solar energy,
animals. wastewater,
These microorganismsparticulate materials
also contribute (thermoelectric
to mitigating fly ashes), and
negative impacts
gaseous
on theeffluents
environmentas acaused
source by of nutrients, without
non-environmentally the need
friendly for arable
technologies land
[1,13]. The [14,15].
main Fur-
advantage
thermore, of microalgae/cyanobacteria
these microorganisms are recognized is the possibility of them
for their highbeing cultivated using
composition of bioactive
solar energy,
compounds, suchwastewater, particulate materials
as polyunsaturated fatty acids, (thermoelectric
phycocyanin, flycarotenoids,
ashes), and gaseous
peptides, and
effluents as a source of nutrients, without the need for arable land [14,15]. Furthermore,
polysaccharides [1,16]. Research shows that polysaccharides from microalgae and cyano-
these microorganisms are recognized for their high composition of bioactive compounds,
bacteria
such may have antioxidant,
as polyunsaturated antiviral,
fatty acids, and antibacterial
phycocyanin, carotenoids,activities [2,4,17].
peptides, and polysaccha-
Polysaccharides from microalgae can be divided into intracellular
rides [1,16]. Research shows that polysaccharides from microalgae and cyanobacteria andmay structural
(which
haveincludes exopolysaccharides
antioxidant, released
antiviral, and antibacterial in the [2,4,17].
activities medium, cell-bound polysaccharides
and cell wall polysaccharides) [5]. Polysaccharides areinto
Polysaccharides from microalgae can be divided intracellular
polymers formedand bystructural
long chains of
(which includes exopolysaccharides released in the medium, cell-bound polysaccharides,
monosaccharides. Depending on the monosaccharides present throughout the chain and
and cell wall polysaccharides) [5]. Polysaccharides are polymers formed by long chains
the type of bond involved, a different polysaccharide with a specific structure and com-
of monosaccharides. Depending on the monosaccharides present throughout the chain
position
and theis formed [10]. involved, a different polysaccharide with a specific structure and
type of bond
Microalgal exopolysaccharides
composition is formed [10]. are synthesized during microalgal cultivation due to
Microalgal exopolysaccharides
normal physiological processes or stressare synthesized
conditions during microalgal
[9]. Specific cultivation
extraction duepurifica-
and
to normal physiological processes or stress conditions [9]. Specific
tion steps will be necessary according to the type of polysaccharide to be extracted extraction and pu- and
rification steps will be necessary according to the type of polysaccharide to be extracted
the condition of microalgae cultivation; centrifugation and filtration are frequently used
and the condition of microalgae cultivation; centrifugation and filtration are frequently
processes (Figure (Figure
used processes 1) [10,11]. Exopolysaccharides
1) [10,11]. Exopolysaccharides cancanbeberecovered fromthe
recovered from the culture me-
culture
dium, resulting
medium, in the
resulting valorization
in the valorizationof of the process.Recently,
the process. Recently, studies
studies have have suggested
suggested the the
application of microalgal polysaccharides in nutraceuticals, food
application of microalgal polysaccharides in nutraceuticals, food development, and as a development, and as a
bioflocculant
bioflocculant [5,10,18,19](Figure
[5,10,18,19] (Figure 1).
1).

Figure 1.Figure
Steps1.for the for
Steps obtention of exopolysaccharides
the obtention (EPS)
of exopolysaccharides from
(EPS) frommicroalgae
microalgae and cyanobacteria
and cyanobacteria cultures
cultures andand
theirtheir po-
tential applications.
potential applications.
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 761

3. Influential Parameters in the Production of Polysaccharides by Microalgae

Mixotrophic cultivations have been reported for polysaccharide production by Neochlo-
ris oleoabundans (1g L−1 ) [20] and Arthrospira platensis (0.30 g L−1 ) [21]. Glucose and sucrose
can be used as carbon sources to promote the accumulation of exopolysaccharides by
Chorella sp. (0.03 g L−1 ) [22]. In addition to carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfate, residual
metal solutions (calcium, magnesium, and iron) and vitamins are constituent nutrients in
culture medium. However, when aiming at the production of a polysaccharide, special
attention is given to nitrogen and phosphorus [9].
Limiting the nutrient supply is a commonly used strategy to increase the polysaccha-
rides’ accumulation by microalgae [9]. However, the microalgal growth and the biomass
concentration can be reduced under these conditions. Therefore, ideal cultivation con-
ditions that stimulate biomass production (nutrients supply, optimal temperature and
luminosity, among others) combined with adverse growth parameters (stress conditions)
are imposed to promote the polysaccharides’ production [23,24]. Moreover, two-stage
cultivations can be applied, where in the first stage, the microalga is cultivated in replete
conditions of nutrients, providing greater biomass production. The second stage is usually
carried out through nutrient deprivation/limitation to increase the polysaccharide content
by microalgae [9]. Thus, it is possible to achieve high yields of microalga polysaccharides
combined with high biomass productivity.

3.1. Nitrogen Source and Salinity

Nutritional optimization has been used to increase the production of exopolysaccha-
rides by microalgae and cyanobacteria [25–32] (Table 1). Lupi et al. [26] evaluated the
synthesis of exopolysaccharides by Botryococcus braunii UC58 cultivated under different ni-
trogen sources (nitrate, ammonium, and urea). The authors found that high concentrations
of these compounds (2.5 g L−1 ) occurred with nitrate as a nitrogen source.

Table 1. Parameters affecting the production of polysaccharides from microalgae and cyanobacteria during cultivation.

Polysaccharide Growing Condition

Culture Medium
Microalga/Cyanobacteria Reactor Production (Temperature and Reference
Composition
g L−1 g gbiomass −1 Light Intensity)
Anabaena sp. NaHCO, KCl, K2 HPO4 ,
Flask (1 L) 17.2 - 460 µE m−2 s−1 ; 40 ◦ C [25]
ATCC 33047 MgSO4 , CaCl2 , NaCl
Chu13; KNO3 ;
Botryococcus braunii
Cylindrical flask CO(NH2 )2 ; (NH4 )2 CO3 ; 2.4 2.2 250 µE m−2 s−1 ; 25 ◦ C [26]
UC 58
1% CO2 , 31 d
CaCl2 ; NaNO3 ;
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Flask (1 L) 0.63 - 20 µmol m−2 s−1 [27]
K2 HPO4 ; MgSO4 9 d
CH3 OH; C2 H5 OH;
C12 H22 O11 ; C6 H12 O6 ;
CH3 COONa; C2 H5 NO2 ; Intense lighting
Chlorella sp. Flask (1 L) 0.03 - [22]
NaHCO3 ; two salinity (studied factor); 20 ◦ C
conditions (fresh water
and sea water)
Mixotrophic cultivation
Chlorella zofingiensis Flask (BG-11; 5.0 g L−1 0.21 0.09 40 µE m−2 s−1 ; 25 ◦ C [28]
glucose); 5 d
Nostoc sp. Flask (0.25 L) BG-11 0.17 0.21 80 µE m−2 s−1 ; 25 ◦ C [29]
Nostoc flageliforme Flask (500 mL) BG-11 0.22 - 60 µmol m−2 s−1 ; 25 ◦C [30]
Vertical F/2 medium
Rhodella violacea photobioreactor with supplemented with 0.59 - 420 µE m−2 s−1 ; 24 ◦ C [31]
flask (700 mL) NaNO3 and NaH2 PO4
Zarrouk medium;
Flask (5 L) and flask 80 µmol m−2 s−1 ;
Spirulina sp. 1 g L−1 NaCl, 5 d; - 1.0 [32]
(0.25 L) 10 µmol m−2 s−1 ; 30 ◦ C
40 g L−1 NaCl; 3 d
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 762

In the cultivation of Cyanothece sp. CCY 0110, the presence of sodium nitrate (NaNO3 )
significantly improved the production of released polysaccharide (1.8 g L−1 ) compared
to a cultivation condition without NaNO3 [33]. In another study, Nostoc sp. BTA97 and
Anabaena sp. BTA990 produced 1.58 and 1.29 mg mL−1 of exopolysaccharides, respectively,
from the absence of a combined nitrogen source [19]. Although NaNO3 is the most
common nitrogen source used by microalgae [9], KNO3 is effective for exopolysaccharides’
accumulation [34,35]. Han et al. [36] evaluated four nitrogen sources (urea, NaNO3 , NH4 Cl,
and arginine) in the Nostoc flagelliform culture. Urea promoted 66% of biomass production
and 217.3% of exopolysaccharide content.
The nitrogen/phosphorus (N/P) ratio has been reported to influence the production
of exopolysaccharides by microalgae [31,37]. Soanen et al. [38] observed that using an N/P
ratio of 3.97, the exopolysaccharide productivity obtained from the microalgae Porphyridium
cruentum was 0.0622 mg × 10−6 cells. The authors also observed that increasing the N/P
ratio reduced biomolecule accumulation (0.0503 mg × 10−6 cells).
Increased salinity causes stress on microalgal cells due to excess sodium and chloride
ions [22]. Studies show that this stress can be beneficial for polysaccharide production. The
salt stress generation by sodium chloride (NaCl 0.3–0.7 mol L−1 ) increased the production
of exopolysaccharides by approximately 63% in Microcoleus vagiantus, which proves to be
a protective cellular response [39]. The production of exopolysaccharides by Cyanothece
sp. increased when the microalga was cultivated with high salinity (70 g L−1 ) [40]. In
another study, the increase in the salinity of freshwater (0.1%) to seawater (3.5%) induced
the production of exopolysaccharides for the Chlorella sp. from 3 to 30 times [22].

3.2. Temperature and Light Intensity

The continuous exposure to high light intensity influences the exopolysaccharides syn-
thesis by microalgae and cyanobacteria. The ideal cultivation for exopolysaccharide produc-
tion by Cyanothece sp. 113 resulted from continuous illumination of 86.0 µE m−2 s−1 [40].
Compared to the control condition (white light), the red light provides a higher accu-
mulation of exopolysaccharides and capsular polysaccharides (44.4 and 261.3 mg g−1 ,
respectively) in Nostoc flagelliform [36]. Ge et al. [29] observed that the highest light intensity
(80 µE m−2 s−1 ) favored the exopolysaccharide and capsular polysaccharide contents in
Nostoc sp. (206.2 and 71.9 mg g−1 , respectively). With 40 µE m−2 s−1 , the microalga accu-
mulated 155.4 mg g−1 of exopolysaccharides and 57.7 mg g−1 of capsular polysaccharides.
The optimal temperature for exopolysaccharide growth depends on the microal-
gal strain cultivated [41]. The exopolysaccharides production in Anabaena sp. (3 g L−1 )
increased approximately 4–5 times by changing the culture temperature from 30–35 to
40–45 ◦ C [25]. Yu et al. [30] observed that for Nostoc flageliforme cultivated in BG-11 medium,
exopolysaccharide accumulation was favored at 25 ◦ C, in which production reached a yield
of 228.56 mg L−1 . In another study, a production of 9.5 g L−1 of exopolysaccharides was
found from Spirulina sp. LEB 18 cultivated in a pilot-scale and raceway reactor. Optimal
conditions of temperature (33–35 ◦ C) and light intensity favored high exopolysaccharide
productivity [42]. When cultivated in an Erlenmeyer flask, the same cyanobacterium
presented an exopolysaccharide yield of 0.21 g L−1 [43].

4. Extraction and Fractionation/Purification

After carrying out the microalgae cultivation under conditions that maximize the
polysaccharide content, it is interesting that the extraction process used is efficient, eco-
nomical, and environmentally correct. The choice of suitable extraction and purification
technologies is essential to make it possible to isolate polysaccharides with high yield and
purity [9,10] to direct the commercial application of these compounds [11].
Centrifugation or microfiltration are commonly used to separate microalgal cells from
polysaccharides [10]. Hence, polysaccharides are precipitated with methanol, ethanol,
isopropanol, or acetone [9]. Concentration under vacuum at low temperatures (50–60 ◦ C)
can be used to minimize the use of alcohol or acetone [11]. Exopolysaccharides can remain
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 763

attached to cells during extraction [9,44]. Thus, physical processes such as sonication,
microwave-assisted extraction, and ultrasound-assisted extraction treatments have been
applied. Chemical and/or ionic methods, such as the use of formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde,
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, sodium hydroxide, hot water, and ionic resin, can also be
used to extract cell-bound polysaccharides [9,10,44].
Chromatographic techniques, such as ion-exchange chromatography, size exclusion
chromatography, and affinity chromatography, are widely used to purify and fractionate
microalgal polysaccharides [20,45–47]. Ion exchange chromatography uses the difference
between the charge properties of molecules to promote separation. By manipulating the
pH, it is possible to change the net surface charge of charged biomolecules to achieve
higher selectivity [48]. Size exclusion chromatography can be used to separate microalgal
polysaccharides with different molecular weights or molecular sizes [49]. Gel perme-
ation chromatography is a widely used size exclusion chromatography for separating
macromolecules. For microalgae, this technique has been applied to characterize polysac-
charides [48]. In affinity chromatography, the target molecule charged by the mobile
phase binds to the immobilized ligand on the stationary phase by affinity. The recovery
of these molecules is carried out by other washing and elution steps [50]. The choice of
polysaccharide purification techniques depends on the requirement of their purity and
type of application. Chromatographic techniques, for example, are interesting for the
pharmaceutical sector since they provide a high purity of polysaccharides [49].
Recently, tangential microfiltration or ultrafiltration and dialysis have been investi-
gated as alternative procedures for polysaccharide purification [11]. The application of
these types of technologies is advantageous when the polysaccharide is accumulated by
marine microalgae since alcoholic precipitation can result in co-precipitation of the polysac-
charides with constituent salts in the culture medium [10]. After extraction and purification,
the polysaccharides are finally lyophilized or dried under a vacuum [11]. Thus, the choice
of reagents and the proportion of volume used, as well as the technologies applied for
the extraction and purification of polysaccharides (Table 2) may vary according to the
microalgal strain, type of polysaccharide application, and/or the purpose of the study.

Table 2. Process parameters for isolation of polysaccharides from microalgae/cyanobacteria.

Biomass Pretreatment for Polysaccharides

Microalga/Cyanobacteria Polysaccharide Main Isolation Processes Contents and/or Reference
Extraction Molecular Weight
Four volumes of ethanol; Deproteinization
(protease addition); Dialysis; Fractionation
Ultrasonic treatment; pH using ion exchange chromatography (DEAE 16.7%
Spirulina platensis [51]
from 11 to 7. A-52 column) and gel filtration (1996 kDa)
chromatography (G-100 column) at a flow
rate of 0.5 mL min−1 .
Four volumes of ethanol; Deproteinization
(protease addition); Dialysis; Fractionation
Ultrasound assisted using ion exchange chromatography
Chlorella pyrenoidosa 5630 kDa [52]
extraction. (DEAE-52 column) and gel filtration
chromatography (G-100 column) at a flow
rate of 0.42 mL min−1 .
Hydration in sodium
acetate buffer + cysteine + Two volumes of ethanol; Fractionation using
Chlorella vulgaris EDTA (pH 5.0) and DEAE-Sephaore ion exchange column eluted 15.0% [53]
incubation with crude with NaCl solutions at a rate of 1 mL min−1 .
papain at 60 ◦ C.
12.7% (Phaeodactylum
Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Dry biomass suspended in tricornutum)
Two volumes of ethanol; Recovery by
Porphyridium sp., distilled water and 5.5% (Porphyridium sp.)
centrifugation + washing (three times with [54]
Dunaliella salina and incubated at 90 ◦ C under 4.1% (Dunaliella salina)
absolute ethanol).
Arthrospira platensis agitation. 2.5% (Arthrospaira
platensis)
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 764

Table 2. Cont.

Biomass Pretreatment for Polysaccharides

Microalga/Cyanobacteria Polysaccharide Main Isolation Processes Contents and/or Reference
Extraction Molecular Weight
Addition of 95% ethanol until ethanol content
Heating (80 ◦ C) and reaches 30%; Deproteinization with Sevag
concentration of the agent (n-butyl alcohol: chloroform: = 1:4); 1 g L−1 (crude
cell-free medium to a Dialysis in cellulose membrane tube and polysaccharide);
Neochloris oleoabundans [20]
quarter of its original concentration under reduced pressure; 0.73 g g−1 (after
volume under reduced Fractionation over a DEAE-Sephacel column purification, 517 kDa).
pressure and 60 ◦ C. and gel filtration chromatography on
Sephadex G200 eluted with 0.1 M NaCl.
Anhydrous ethanol precipitation;
Deproteinization with Sevag agent
Haematococcus Ultrasound assisted (n-butanol: chloroform = 1:5); Fractionation
23413 kDa [45]
Pluvialis extraction using a DEAEcellulose-52 chromatography
column (2 mL min−1 ); Sephacryl S-400 gel
permeation chromatography (0.3 mL min−1 ).

5. Characterization of Microalgal Polysaccharides

5.1. Chemical Composition
Polysaccharides are polymeric carbohydrate macromolecules with complex structures
in terms of monosaccharide composition [55,56]. The chemical composition of polysac-
charides, including exopolysaccharides in microalgae and cyanobacteria, depends on
taxonomy, culture parameters such as temperature, light intensity, presence of metal ions,
nutrient concentration, as well as the culture age. According to the chemical composition,
exopolysaccharides can be divided into homopolysaccharides (composed of a type of
monosaccharide) and heteropolysaccharides (comprising two or more types of monomeric
units) [57].
Microalgal polysaccharides are heteropolymers composed mainly of galactose, xylose,
and glucose in different proportions, linked by glycosidic bonds [17]. Other sugars, such as
rhamnose, fucose, arabinose, mannose, orthomethyl sugar, and acid residues of glucuronic
acid and galacturonic acid can also be constituents of polysaccharides from microalgae
and cyanobacteria [57]. Glucose is the most commonly found sugar. Fructose is not
generally found in microalgal exopolysaccharides. However, it is often constituted in
exopolysaccharides produced by cyanobacteria [56] (Table 3). Guo et al. [7] described
heteropolysaccharides from Chlorella pyrenoidosa composed of rhamnose, glucosamine,
glucuronic acid, glucose, mannose, fucose, galactose, and xylose. In the same study,
Spirulina platensis presented predominantly rhamnose and glucose monosaccharides, in
addition to the presence of glucuronic acid, mannose, glucosamine, fucose, and xylose.
Jesus et al. [18] reported glucose as the predominant monosaccharide in the composition of
extracellular polymeric substances from Spirulina.

Table 3. Chemical composition of exopolysaccharides from microalgae and cyanobacteria.

Uronic Methylated Amino

Microorganism Sugar Composition Sulphates Reference
Acids Sugars Acids
Anabaena sp. Glucose *, xylose *, rhamnose + − − − [46]
Arthrospira Fructose, fucose, galactose, glucose *,
+ − − − [58]
platensis mannose, rhamnose, ribose, xylose
Arthrospira Glucose *, rhamnose, arabinose, fucose,
+ − − − [59]
platensis mannose, galactose, xylose
Chlorella Mannose, rhamnose, glucose, fucose, xylose,
+ − − − [52]
pyrenoidosa arabinose
Chlorella Fructose, glucose *, maltose, lactose,
+ + − + [60]
vulgaris rhamnose, arabinose
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 765

Table 3. Cont.

Uronic Methylated Amino

Microorganism Sugar Composition Sulphates Reference
Acids Sugars Acids
Dixoniella grisea Xylose *, rhamnose + + + − [8]
Fucose, rhamnose, arabinose *, galactose,
Gloeocapsa sp. + − − − [61]
glucose *, mannose, fructose, xylose *, ribose
Glucose, galactose, mannose, fucose *,
Graesiella sp. + + − + [62]
rhamnose, xylose, arabinose, ribose
Neochloris Glucose *, mannose *, galactose *, xylose,
+ − − + [20]
oleoabundans ribose, arabinose, rhamnose
Nostoc carneum Xylose *, glucose + + − − [63]
Porphyridium
Xylose *, glucose, galactose + + + − [8]
aerugineum
Spirulina sp.
Glucose, fructose, galactose + − − + [18]
LEB 18
+ detected, − absent/not detected, * dominant sugar (s).

Uronic acids, pyruvates, and acyl groups of carbohydrates or carboxylic groups of

amino acids in the protein portion contribute to the anionic nature of exopolysaccha-
rides [18,64]. These characteristics confer affinity for positively charged ions (mainly
metallic ions). With this, microalgae exopolysaccharides present high potentiality for biore-
mediation use [57]. On the other hand, acetyl groups linked to ester, peptide fractions, and
fucose and rhamnose are responsible for the hydrophobic nature of some exopolysaccha-
rides. Due to these hydrophobic groups, these polysaccharides have interesting emulsifying
properties for various industrial applications [57,65].

5.2. Functional Characteristics

Polysaccharides are natural macromolecules that participate in several biological
processes, such as cell adhesion, cell-to-cell communication and immune response [10,66].
Moreover, these bioactive compounds have antioxidant, immunomodulatory, anticancer,
antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral activities [10,67]. Polysaccharides from
Chlorella and Spirulina, for example, have been reported as anti-obesity agents [7]. Polysac-
charides produced by Chlorella vulgaris have also been shown to prevent chronic airway
inflammation [60,68]. Thus, due to these potentialities, there is interest in the use of
microalgal polysaccharides for applications in nutraceuticals and drugs [67].
The functional properties of polysaccharides differ according to the composition of
monosaccharides, molecular weight, sulfate and uronic acid content, type of bonds, and
distribution in the molecule. Moreover, chain size and conformation in space, presence of
other chemical groups (amino acids, proteins, or nucleic acids), and solvents used during
the extraction of these compounds are factors that influence their properties [17,64,67,69].
Tannin-Spitz et al. [70] related the antioxidant potential of the exopolysaccharide from
Porphyridium cruentum with its sulfate content (4.5%) and/or the presence of glycoprotein
(66 kDa). Furthermore, the antioxidant property of polysaccharides can be inversely related
to their molecular weight [10]. In a study by Sun et al. [71], it was found that the 6.5 kDa
fragment had higher radical scavenging activity than the 256 and 60.6 kDa fragments.
Immunomodulatory effects were also related to the molecular weight of the polysac-
charide. Low molecular weight exopolysaccharides from Porphyridium cruentum had better
immunomodulatory effects. This same study proved that at high concentrations of the
exopolysaccharide (200 mg kg−1 d−1 ), tumor inhibition was 53.3% [72]. Other antiprolifer-
ative effects were observed by polysaccharides from Graesiella sp. [62], Tribonema sp. [73],
and Phaeodactylum tricornutum [74] against HepG2 cell lines (liver cancer).
In a study developed by Liberman et al. [75], it was found that the polysaccharide from
Porphyridium sp. showed antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (72%) and Bacillus
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 766

subtilis (35% reduction). The authors related the antibacterial capacity of polysaccharides
to the different compositions and structures of bacterial cell walls. Liberman et al. [75] also
evaluated the synergy between the polysaccharide and Zn2+ bioactivities and found that
the biomaterial presented a promising potential for the development of new pharmaceutical
and cosmetic products.
Regarding the antiviral potential of microalgae polysaccharides, strains with a high
degree of sulphation and uranic acid content stand out. These acidic compounds and
the half-ester sulfate groups and carboxyl groups contribute to the anionic properties of
exopolysaccharides and consequently act as protective agents against viruses [64].

5.3. Rheological Properties

Polysaccharides secreted by microalgal cells increase the viscosity of the culture
medium. The culture medium generally exhibits non-Newtonian rheological behavior [76].
Even at low concentrations, polysaccharides tend to form highly viscous solutions. This
fact can be related to the formation of hydrogen bonds due to hydroxyl or amino groups in
the chain structure [8]. Thus, rheological properties can be used as a strategy to assess the
polysaccharide content in microalgae [20].
The chemical composition of polysaccharides also interferes with the rheological
properties of the solutions. Libermann et al. [8] compared the rheological characteristics
of sulfated polysaccharide solutions from Dixoniella grisea and Porphyridium aerugineum
with the polysaccharide from Porphyridium sp. According to the authors, differences in the
rheology of polysaccharides are related to their sugar composition and sulfate contents.
The content of charged groups (sulfate and glucuronic acid) in the polysaccharide of
Porphyridium sp. (~21%) was higher than that found in the polysaccharides Dixoniella grisea
and Porphyridium aerugineum (~13 and ~9%, respectively). The greater amount of charged
groups contributes to greater repulsion between the chains, resulting in lower viscosity.
The rheological characteristics contribute to expand the use of polysaccharides as thick-
eners, gelling agents, and preservatives in the food and pharmaceutical industries [46,57].
The addition of ions does not significantly interfere in the rheology of polysaccharide
solutions. Thus, the addition of the salts on microalgal polysaccharides has shown that
these components are stable over a wide range of ionic strengths. This information can
be considered relevant for the food industry since CaCl2 and NaCl are commonly used in
food formulations [8,77]. Furthermore, Prybylski et al. [10] reported that viscosity may be
related to the functional activities of polysaccharides. Anti-inflammatory and hypocholes-
terolemic properties were associated with the high viscosity of the polysaccharide from
Porphyridium cruentum.

6. Applications of Polysaccharides
Microalgae can produce a range of polysaccharides with interesting physicochemical
properties and antioxidant potential. Wan et al. [4] purified polysaccharides from microalga
Chlorella pyrenoidosa and evaluated their effect on increasing the lifetime of Caenorhabditis
elegans. The authors observed a decrease in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid perox-
idation, in addition to an increase in the activity of the antioxidant enzyme (superoxide
dismutase) in the model organism. Thus, the authors concluded that these polysaccharides
could potentially regulate aging and oxidative diseases. In another study, Li et al. [6]
demonstrated that polysaccharides from Nostoc (Nostoglycan) were able to reduce reactive
oxygen species, inhibit lipid peroxidation, and suppress tumor cell proliferation.
Moreover, polysaccharides from microalgae and cyanobacteria have been studied
for applications as plant biostimulants (Table 4) due to characteristics such as bioactivity
and permeability capacity, besides effects on plant key mechanisms such as photosynthe-
sis [17], in addition to resulting in increases in its proteins and carotenoids [78]. Thus,
polysaccharides could be applied to reduce the use of pesticides and contribute to the
promotion of sustainable agriculture [54]. According to Chanda et al. [17], polysaccharides
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 767

from microalgae can stimulate plant growth and resistance by different mechanisms, such
as increasing nutrient access through the roots and photosynthesis by the shoot.

Table 4. Potential application of polysaccharides from different strains of microalgae and cyanobacteria.

Strains Potential application Reference

Desmodesmus sp., P. tricornutum, Porphorydium Plant (tomato)
[54]
sp., Arthrospira platensis, and Dunaliella salina resistance inducer
Arthrospira platensis, Dunaliella salina, and Plant (tomato)
[78]
Porphorydium sp. bio-stimulant
Plant (wheat and
Chlorella vulgaris French bean) [60]
bio-stimulant
Food and health
Nostoc sphaeroides [6]
industries
Spirulina platensis Functional food [51]
Thickening/lubrication
Porphyridium sp. [8]
agent

Recently, due to the great worldwide concern, researchers have been looking for envi-
ronmentally friendly solutions for the bioremediation of different wastewater contaminants.
In this context, Cunha et al. [79] evaluated extracellular polymeric substances from Cyan-
othece sp. for removing nano and microplastics from water. The authors observed that the
biopolymer from the microalga acted as a bioflocculant and aggregated polystyrene plastic
particles. However, exposure to plastic contaminants resulted in a significant reduction in
microalgal growth.
Arad and Levy-Ontman have reported the capacity of red-microalgal polysaccharides
to benefit human health and also highlighted its applications for medicinal and cosmetic
areas [80]. In the commercial stage, exopolysaccharides from Porphyridium cruentum are al-
ready used to develop cosmetic active ingredients for skin hydration [12]. Some companies
isolate polysaccharides from Porphyridium cruentum. EPS Revive, a sulfated polysaccharide
produced by the Yemoja company, is already marketed to the cosmetics industry. The
company has several applications for the product, such as anti-aging, anti-inflammatory,
and rejuvenating properties. The company AlgaTech cultivates Porphyridium cruentum and
mentions that the microalgae biomass can contain up to 40% polysaccharides with great
potential to protect the cell against environmental stress and provide carbon skeletons
during starvation periods. According to Pierre et al. [81], despite the range of studies on
the analytical stage about EPS from microalgae and the various existing suggestions for
its uses in a range of areas, its application and valorization are generally limited to high
priced products such as food and nutraceuticals, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical fields due
to the high production costs.

7. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Despite a range of benefits, the production of exopolysaccharides from microalgae
faces obstacles such as achieving a high microalgal growth rate and high exopolysaccharide
production simultaneously during cultivation. Some issues related to the production of
polysaccharides can be addressed by optimizing cultivation variables, such as shear stress,
temperature, and light quality [11].
Another challenge is to cultivate microalgae with high salinity, as these salts can make
the precipitation step of exopolysaccharides difficult. Thus, several research suggests the
application of processes such as dialysis or tangential ultrafiltration to separate the salts
from exopolysaccharides [5,9]. Besides helping to desalt the exopolysaccharides, this step
can add value to the process, as high-value compounds such as pigments can be obtained
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 768

simultaneously [5]. However, during ultrafiltration, the process efficiency may be reduced,
depending on the viscosity of the microalgal exopolysaccharides [9]. Freshwater strains
application on EPS production could also be an alternative to avoid the desalting step [81].
The presence of proteins, pigments, and cell wall materials interferes negatively in
polysaccharide separation and quantification assays [9]. Furthermore, the cell-bound
polysaccharide is another challenge when it comes to the extraction steps [5]. To obtain
these compounds, physical methods can also be applied [10].
According to Pierre et al. [81], microalgae produce EPS more slowly than bacteria,
presenting higher production costs. Additionally, some processes of the extraction, purifi-
cation, and quantification of polysaccharides from microalgae have high costs, which limits
their application in certain fields. The conventional methods for evaluating polysaccharides
from microalgae require high investments (financial and time) [67]. In this context, to assist
in routine analyses, Decamp et al. [67] developed a new method to determine the compo-
sition of microalgal polysaccharides and facilitate the checking of microalgae cultivation.
The new protocol resulted in findings close to those obtained using conventional chro-
matography, in addition to advantages such as less time and cost requirements. In another
study, Li et al. [20] proposed an indirect quantitative method of rapid assessment to deter-
mine exopolysaccharides based on their rheological properties in the medium. Thus, it is
concluded that the development of affordable and practical methods can be considered an
interesting approach to overcome the barriers of the quantification of exopolysaccharides
from microalgae.

8. Conclusions
Microalgae are promising alternatives for obtaining polysaccharides while contribut-
ing to the mitigation of the environmental pollution generated by industrial waste. Microal-
gal polysaccharides have promising rheological and biological properties for applications in
various sectors, especially in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. However,
one of the biggest challenges is to optimize the growing conditions and extraction processes
to promote higher productivity and polysaccharide yield, respectively. The market share
of these biocompounds with hydrocolloid characteristics is still limited, as production
costs are not competitive with those produced from other well-established raw materials,
such as macroalgae and plants. Furthermore, a microalgal biorefinery approach can be a
strategy to reduce costs and increase competitiveness, using biomass for the production of
polysaccharides and other compounds of commercial interest.

Author Contributions: Writing—original draft preparation, B.F.L., A.G.P.A., and J.B.M.; writing—
review and editing, B.F.L., A.G.P.A., J.B.M., and M.G.d.M.; supervision project administration, J.A.V.C.
and M.G.d.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Acknowledgments: This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de
Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES)–Finance Code 001. This research was developed within
the scope of the Capes-PrInt Program (Process # 88887.310848/2018-00).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Costa, J.A.V.; Freitas, B.C.B.; Moraes, L.; Zaparoli, M.; Morais, M.G. Progress in the physicochemical treatment of microalgae
biomass for value-added product recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 301, 122727. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Chen, Y.-X.; Liu, X.-Y.; Xiao, Z.; Huang, Y.-F.; Liu, B. Antioxidant activities of polysaccharides obtained from Chlorella pyrenoidosa
via different ethanol concentrations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol 2016, 91, 505–509. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 769

3. Phélippé, M.; Gonçalves, O.; Thouand, G.; Cogne, G.; Laroche, C. Characterization of the polysaccharides chemical diversity of
the cyanobacteria Arthrospira Platensis. Algal Res. 2019, 38, 101426. [CrossRef]
4. Wan, X.; Li, X.; Liu, D.; Gao, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.; Fu, C.; Lin, L.; Liu, B.; Zhao, C. Physicochemical characterization and
antioxidant effects of green microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa polysaccharide by regulation of microRNAs and gut microbiota in
Caenorhabditis elegans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 168, 152–162. [CrossRef]
5. Gaignard, C.; Gargouch, N.; Dubessay, P.; Delattre, C.; Pierre, G.; Laroche, C.; Fendri, I.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P. New horizons
in culture and valorization of red microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 193–222. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Li, H.; Su, L.; Chen, S.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Ding, F.; Chen, H.; Shi, R.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Z. Physicochemical characterization
and functional analysis of the polysaccharide from the edible microalga Nostoc Sphaeroides. Molecules 2018, 23, 508. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
7. Guo, W.; Zhu, S.; Li, S.; Feng, Y.; Wu, H.; Zeng, M. Microalgae polysaccharides ameliorates obesity in association with modulation
of lipid metabolism and gut microbiota in high-fat-diet fed C57BL/6 mice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 182, 1371–1383. [CrossRef]
8. Liberman, G.N.; Ochbaum, G.; Mejubovsky-Mikhelis, M.; Bitton, R.; Arad, S.M. Physico-chemical characteristics of the sulfated
polysaccharides of the red microalgae Dixoniella grisea and Porphyridium aerugineum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 1171–1179.
[CrossRef]
9. Delattre, C.; Pierre, G.; Laroche, C.; Michaud, P. Production, extraction and characterization of microalgal and cyanobacterial
exopolysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1159–1179. [CrossRef]
10. Prybylski, N.; Toucheteau, C.; Alaoui, H.E.; Bridiau, N.; Maugard, T.; Abdelkafi, S.; Fendri, I.; Delattre, C.; Dubessay, P.; Pierre,
G.; et al. Bioactive polysaccharides from microalgae. In Handbook of Microalgae-Based Processes and Products; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 533–571. [CrossRef]
11. Cruz, D.; Vasconcelos, V.; Pierre, G.; Michaud, P.; Delattre, C. Exopolysaccharides from cyanobacteria: Strategies for bioprocess
development. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3763. [CrossRef]
12. Givaudan. Hydrintense™—A Moisturising Wave for Your Skin. Available online: https://www.givaudan.com/fragrance-
beauty/active-beauty/products/hydrintense (accessed on 18 July 2021).
13. Chai, W.S.; Tan, W.G.; Munawaroh, H.S.H.; Gupta, V.K.; Ho, S.-H.; Show, P.L. Multifaceted roles of microalgae in the application
of wastewater biotreatment: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269, 116236. [CrossRef]
14. Morais, M.G.; Morais, E.G.; Cardias, B.B.; Vaz, B.S.; Moreira, J.B.; Mitchell, B.G.; Costa, J.A.V. Microalgae as a source of sustainable
biofuels. In Recent Developments in Bioenergy Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 253–271. [CrossRef]
15. Kumar, M.; Sun, Y.; Rathour, R.; Pandey, A.; Thakur, I.S.; Tsang, D.C.W. Algae as potential feedstock for the production of biofuels
and value-added products: Opportunities and challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 137116. [CrossRef]
16. Lucas, B.F.; Morais, M.G.; Santos, T.D.; Costa, J.A.V. Spirulina for snack enrichment: Nutritional, physical and sensory evaluations.
LWT 2018, 90, 270–276. [CrossRef]
17. Chanda, M.-J.; Merghoub, N.; Arroussi, H.E. Microalgae polysaccharides: The new sustainable bioactive products for the
development of plant bio-stimulants? World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 177. [CrossRef]
18. Jesus, C.S.; Assis, D.J.; Rodriguez, M.B.; Filho, J.A.M.; Costa, J.A.V.; Ferreira, E.S.; Druzian, J.I. Pilot-scale isolation and charac-
terization of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from cell-free medium of Spirulina sp. LEB-18 cultures under outdoor
conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 1106–1114. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Tiwari, O.N.; Khangembam, R.; Shamjetshabam, M.; Sharma, A.S.; Oinam, G.; Brand, J.J. Characterization and optmization of
bioflocculant exopolyssaccharide production by Cyanobacteria Nostoc sp. BTA97 and Anabaena sp. BTA 990 in culture conditions.
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 1950–1963. [CrossRef]
20. Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Su, J.; Lan, C.Q.; Zhong, M.; Hu, X. Production, isolation and bioactive estimation of extracellular
polysaccharides of green microalga Neochloris Oleoabundans. Algal Res. 2020, 48, 101883. [CrossRef]
21. Trabelsi, L.; Ouada, H.B.; Zili, F.; Mazhoud, N.; Ammar, J. Evaluation of Arthrospira platensis extracellular polymeric substances
production in photoautotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic conditions. Folia Microbiol. 2013, 58, 39–45. [CrossRef]
22. Vo, H.N.P.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Liu, Y.; Chang, S.W.; Nguyen, D.D.; Zhang, X.; Liang, H.; Xue, S. Selective carbon sources
and salinities enhance enzymes and extracellular polymeric substances extrusion of Chlorella sp. for potential co-metabolism.
Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 303, 122877. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Deamici, K.M.; Morais, M.G.; Santos, L.O.; Muylaert, K.; Gardarin, C.; Costa, J.A.V.; Laroche, C. Static magnetic fields effects on
polysaccharides production by different microalgae strains. J. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5299. [CrossRef]
24. González-Fernández, C.; Ballesteros, M. Linking microalgae and cyanobacteria culture conditions and key-enzymes for carbohy-
drate accumulation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1655–1661. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Moreno, J.; Vargas, M.A.; Olivares, H.R.; Guerrero, M.G. Exopolysaccharide production by the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp.
ATCC 33047 in batch and continuous culture. J. Biotechnol. 1998, 60, 175–182. [CrossRef]
26. Lupi, F.M.; Fernandes, H.M.L.; Tomé, M.M.; Sá-Correia, I.; Novais, J.M. Influence of nitrogen source and photoperiod on
exopolysaccharide synthesis by the microalga Botryococcus braunii UC 58. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1994, 16, 546–550. [CrossRef]
27. Bafana, A. Characterization and optimization of production of exopolysaccharide from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Carbohydr.
Polym. 2013, 95, 746–752. [CrossRef]
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 770

28. Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Chen, F. Production and characterization of exopolysaccharides from Chlorella zofingiensis and Chlorella vulgaris
with anti-colorectal cancer activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 976–983. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Ge, H.; Xia, L.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, D.; Hu, C. Effects of Light Intensity on Components and Topographical Structures of Extracellular
Polysaccharides from the Cyanobacteria Nostoc sp. J. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 179–183. [CrossRef]
30. Yu, H.; Jia, S.; Dai, Y. Accumulation of exopolysaccharides in liquid suspension culture of Nostoc flagelliforme cells. Biotechnol.
Appl. Biochem. 2010, 160, 552–560. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Villay, A.; Laroche, C.; Roriz, D.; El Alaoui, H.; Delbac, F.; Michaud, P. Optimisation of culture parameters for exopolysaccharides
production by the microalga Rhodella violacea. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146, 732–735. [CrossRef]
32. Chentir, I.; Hamdi, M.; Doumandji, A.; HadjSadok, A.; Ouada, H.B.; Nasri, M.; Jridi, M. Enhancement of extracellular polymeric
substances (EPS) production in Spirulina (Arthrospira sp.) by two-step cultivation process and partial characterization of their
polysaccharidic moiety. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 1412–1420. [CrossRef]
33. Mota, R.; Guimaraes, R.; Büttel, Z.; Rossi, F.; Colica, G.; Silva, C.J.; Santos, C.; Gales, L.; Zille, A.; Philippis, R.; et al. Production
and characterization of extracellular carbohydrate polymer from Cyanothece sp. CCY 0110. Carboydr. Polym. 2013, 93, 1408–1415.
[CrossRef]
34. Jindal, N.; Singh, D.P.; Khattar, J.I.S. Kinetics and physico-chemical characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by the
cyanobacterium Oscillatoria formosa. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 2139–2146. [CrossRef]
35. Khattar, J.I.S.; Singh, D.P.; Jindal, N.; Kaur, N.; Singh, Y.; Rahi, P.; Gulati, A. Isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharides
produced by the cyanobacterium Limnothrix redekei PUPCCC 116. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162, 1327–1338. [CrossRef]
36. Han, P.-P.; Sun, Y.; Jia, S.-R.; Zhong, C.; Tan, Z.-L. Effects of light wavelengths on extracellular and capsular polysaccharide
production by Nostoc flagelliforme. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 105, 145–151. [CrossRef]
37. Razaghi, A.; Godhe, A.; Albers, E. Effects of nitrogen on growth and carbohydrate formation in Porphyridium cruentum. Cent. Eur.
J. Biol. 2014, 9, 156–162. [CrossRef]
38. Soanen, N.; Silva, E.; Gardarin, C.; Michaud, P.; Laroche, C. Improvement of exopolysaccharide production by Porphyridium
marinum. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 213, 231–238. [CrossRef]
39. Chen, L.-Z.; Li, D.-H.; Song, L.R.; Hu, C.X.; Wang, G.H.; Liu, Y.D. Effects of salt stress on carbohydrate metabolism in desert soil
alga Microcoleus vaginatus Gom. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 2006, 48, 914–919. [CrossRef]
40. Chi, Z.; Su, C.D.; Lu, W.D. A new exopolysaccharide produced by marine Cyanothece sp. 113. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98,
1329–1332. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. Lakatos, G.E.; Ranglová, K.; Manoel, J.C.; Grivalsky, T.; Kopecky, J.; Masojídek, J. Bioethanol production from microalgae
polysaccharides. Folia Microbiol. 2019, 64, 627–644. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Jesus, C.S.; Uebel, L.S.; Costa, S.S.; Miranda, A.L.; Morais, E.G.; Morais, M.G.; Costa, J.A.V.; Nunes, I.L.; Ferreira, E.S.; Druzian, J.I.
Outdoor pilot-scale cultivation of Spirulina sp. LEB-18 in different geographic locations for evaluating its growth and chemical
composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 256, 86–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Trabelsi, L.; Ouada, H.B.; Bacha, H.; Ghoul, M. Combined effect of temperature and light intensity on growth and extracellular
polymeric substance production by the cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2009, 21, 405–412. [CrossRef]
44. Gaignard, C.; Laroche, C.; Pierre, G.; Dubessay, P.; Delattre, C.; Gardarin, C.; Gourvil, P.; Probert, I.; Dubuffet, A.; Michaud, P.
Screening of marine microalgae: Investigation of new exopolysaccharide producers. Algal Res. 2019, 44, 101711. [CrossRef]
45. Liu, X.; Zhang, M.; Liu, H.; Zhou, A.; Cao, Y.; Liu, X. Preliminary characterization of the structure and immunostimulatory and
anti-aging properties of the polysaccharide fraction of Haematococcus pluvialis†. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 9243–9252. [CrossRef]
46. Tiwari, O.N.; Mondal, A.; Bhunia, B.; Bandyopadhyay, T.K.; Jaladi, P.; Oinam, G.; Indrama, T. Purification, characterization and
biotechnological potential of new exopolysaccharide polymers produced by cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. CCC 745. Polymer
2019, 178, 121695. [CrossRef]
47. Sushytskyi, L.; Lukáč, P.; Synytsya, A.; Bleha, R.; Rajsiglová, L.; Capek, P.; Pohl, R.; Vannucci, L.; Čopíková, J.; Kaštánek, P.
Immunoactive polysaccharides produced by heterotrophic mutant of green microalga Parachlorella kessleri HY1 (Chlorellaceae).
Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 246, 116588. [CrossRef]
48. Corrêa, P.S.; Júnior, W.G.M.; Martins, A.A.; Caetano, N.S.; Mata, T.M. Microalgae biomolecules: Extraction, separation and
purification methods. Processes 2021, 9, 10. [CrossRef]
49. Xu, S.-Y.; Huang, X.; Cheong, K.-T. Recent advances in marine algae polysaccharides: Isolation, structure, and activities. Mar.
Drugs. 2017, 15, 388. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Urh, M.; Simpson, D.; Zhao, K. Affinity chromatography: General methods. Methods Enzymol. 2009, 463, 417–438. [CrossRef]
51. Chen, Y.; Wan, X.; Wu, D.; Ouyang, Y.; Gao, L.; Chen, Z.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Wang, M.-f.; Chen, X.; Zhao, C. Characterization of the
structure and analysis of the anti-oxidant effect of microalga Spirulina platensis polysaccharide on Caenorhabditis elegans mediated
by modulating microRNAs and gut microbiota. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 2295–2305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Wan, X.-Z.; Ai, C.; Chen, Y.-H.; Gao, X.-X.; Zhong, R.-T.; Liu, B.; Chen, X.-H.; Zhao, C. Physicochemical characterization of a
polysaccharide from green microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa and its hypolipidemic activity via gut microbiota regulation in rats.
J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 1186–1197. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53. Reck, L.; Andrade, F.R.N.; Maia, H.D.; Silva, D.C.; Araújo, A.L.A.C.; Abreu, K.V.; Batista, J.L.; Cavancante, K.M.S.P. Extraction of
sulfated polysaccharide from microalgae Chlorella vulgaris produced in effluent generated by pisciculture. Braz. J. Develop. 2020, 6,
64379–64387. [CrossRef]
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 771

54. Rachidi, F.; Benhima, R.; Kasmi, Y.; Sbabou, L.; Arroussi, H.E. Evaluation of microalgae polysaccharides as biostimulants of
tomato plant defense using metabolomics and biochemical approaches. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Nie, C.; Zhu, P.; Ma, S.; Wang, M.; Hu, Y. Purification, characterization and immunomodulatory activity of polysaccharides from
stem lettuce. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 188, 236–242. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Rossi, F.; De Philippis, R. Exocellular polysaccharides in microalgae and cyanobacteria: Chemical features, role and enzymes
and genes involved in their biosynthesis. In The Physiology of Microalgae, 1st ed.; Borowitzka, M.A., Beardall, J., Raven, J.A., Eds.;
Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 565–590. [CrossRef]
57. Kumar, D.; Kaštánek, P.; Adhikary, S.P. Exopolysaccharides from cyanobacteria and microalgae and their commercial application.
Curr. Sci. 2018, 115, 234–241. [CrossRef]
58. Ahmed, M.; Moerdijk-Poortvliet, T.C.W.; Wijnholds, A.; Stal, L.J.; Hasnain, S. Isolation, characterization and localization of
extracellular polymeric substances from the cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis strain MMG-9. Eur. J. Phycol. 2014, 49, 143–150.
[CrossRef]
59. Liu, Q.; Yao, C.; Sun, Y.; Chen, W.; Tan, H.; Cao, X.; Xue, S.; Yin, H. Production and structural characterization of a new type of
polysaccharide from nitrogen-limited Arthrospira platensis cultivated in outdoor industrial-scale open raceway ponds. Biotechnol.
Biofuels 2019, 12, 131. [CrossRef]
60. El-Naggar, N.E.-A.; Hussein, M.H.; Shaaban-Dessuuki, S.A.; Dalal, S.R. Production, extraction and characterization of Chlorella
vulgaris soluble polysaccharides and their applications in AgNPs biosynthesis and biostimulation of plant growth. Sci. Rep. 2020,
10, 1–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Rossi, F.; Micheletti, E.; Bruno, L.; Adhikary, S.P.; Albertano, P.; De Philippis, R. Characteristics and role of the exocellular
polysaccharides produced by fi e cyanobacteria isolated from phototrophic biofilms growing on Indian stone monuments.
Biofouling 2012, 28, 215–224. [CrossRef]
62. Trabelsi, L.; Chaieb, O.; Mnari, A.; Abid-Essafi, S.; Aleya, L. Partial characterization and antioxidant and antiproliferative activities
of the aqueous extracellular polysaccharides from the thermophilic microalgae Graesiella sp. Complement. Altern. Med. 2016,
12, 210. [CrossRef]
63. Hussein, M.; Abou-ElWafa, G.S.; Shaaban-Dessuuki, S.A.; Hassan, N.I. Characterization and antioxidant activity of exopolysac-
charide secreted by Nostoc Carneum. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 11, 432–439. [CrossRef]
64. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, A.M.M.B.; de Morais, R.M.S.C. Bioactivity and Applications of Polysaccharides from Marine
Microalgae. In Polysaccharides; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 1–38. [CrossRef]
65. Shepherd, R.; Rockey, J.; Sutherland, I.W.; Roller, S. Novel bioemulsifiers from microorganisms for use in foods. J. Biotechnol. 1995,
40, 207–217. [CrossRef]
66. Dwek, R.A. Glycobiology: Toward understanding the function of sugars. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 683–720. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
67. Decamp, A.; Michelo, O.; Rabbat, C.; Laroche, C.; Grizeau, D.; Pruvost, J.; Gonçalves, O. A new, quick, and simple protocol to
evaluate microalgae polysaccharide composition. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 101. [CrossRef]
68. Barboríková, J.; Šutovská, M.; Kazimierová, I.; Jošková, M.; Fraňová, S.; Kopecký, J.; Capek, P. Extracellular polysaccharide
produced by Chlorella vulgaris—Chemical characterization and anti-asthmatic profile. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 1–11.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
69. Kashif, A.S.; Hwang, Y.J.; Park, J.K. Potent biomedical applications of isolated polysaccharides from marine microalgae Tetraselmis
species. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 41, 1611–1620. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
70. Tannin-Spitz, T.; Bergman, M.; Grossman, S.; Arad, S. Antioxidant activity of the polysaccharide of the red microalga Porphyridium
sp. J. Appl. Phycol. 2005, 17, 215–222. [CrossRef]
71. Sun, L.; Wang, C.; Shi, Q.; Ma, C. Preparation of different molecular weight polysaccharides from Porphyridium cruentum and
their antioxidant activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2009, 45, 42–47. [CrossRef]
72. Sun, L.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y. Immunomodulation and antitumor activities of different molecular-weight polysaccharides from
Porphyridium cruentum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 1206–1210. [CrossRef]
73. Chen, X.; Song, L.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Yu, H.; Wang, X.; Li, R.; Liu, T.; Li, P. Partial characterization, the immune modulation and
anticancer activities of sulfated polysaccharides from filamentous microalgae Tribonema sp. Molecules 2019, 24, 322. [CrossRef]
74. Yang, S.; Wan, H.; Wang, R.; Hao, D. Sulfated polysaccharides from Phaeodactylum tricornutum: Isolation, structural characteristics,
and inhibiting HepG2 growth activity in vitro. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6409. [CrossRef]
75. Liberman, G.N.; Ochbaum, G.; Arad, S.M.; Bitton, R. The sulfated polysaccharide from a marine red microalga as a platform for
the incorporation of zinc ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 152, 658–664. [CrossRef]
76. Bernaerts, T.M.M.; Kyomugasho, C.; Looveren, N.V.; Gheysen, L.; Foubert, I.; Hendrickx, M.E.; Loey, A.M.V. Molecular and
rheological characterization of different cell wall fractions of Porphyridium cruentum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 195, 542–550.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
77. Behrouzian, F.; Razavi, S.M.; Karazhiyan, H. Intrinsic viscosity of cress (Lepidium sativum) seed gum: Effect of salts and sugars.
Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 100–105. [CrossRef]
78. Rachidi, F.; Benhima, R.; Sbabou, L.; Arroussi, H.E. Microalgae polysaccharides bio-stimulating effect on tomato plants: Growth
and metabolic distribution. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 25, e00426. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79. Cunha, C.; Silva, L.; Paulo, J.; Faria, M.; Nogueira, N.; Cordeiro, N. Microalgal-based biopolymer for nano- and microplastic
removal: A possible biosolution for wastewater treatment. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114385. [CrossRef]
Polysaccharides 2021, 2 772

80. Arad, S.M.; Levy-Ontman, O. Red microalgal cell-wall polysaccharides: Biotechnological aspects. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21,
358–364. [CrossRef]
81. Pierre, G.; Delattre, C.; Dubessay, P.; Jubeau, S.; Vialleix, C.; Cadoret, J.-P.; Probert, I.; Michaud, P. What Is in Store for EPS
Microalgae in the Next Decade? Molecules 2019, 24, 4296. [CrossRef]