0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views21 pages

Learning Styles

The document discusses learning styles and teaching methods. It defines different learning modalities including visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic learners. It also discusses field dependent and field independent cognitive styles. The document recommends that teachers incorporate a variety of teaching approaches to engage different learning styles.

Uploaded by

Mahmoud Jalambo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views21 pages

Learning Styles

The document discusses learning styles and teaching methods. It defines different learning modalities including visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic learners. It also discusses field dependent and field independent cognitive styles. The document recommends that teachers incorporate a variety of teaching approaches to engage different learning styles.

Uploaded by

Mahmoud Jalambo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

What are they and why do they matter?

ž For discussion: What was your favorite class/


worst class in high school or college? Why
was that?
ž What do you think is/are your own preferred
style(s) of learning?
ž How would you describe your preferred
teaching methods?
ž Average number of graduate level courses on
teaching methodology at the post-secondary
level taken by U.S. faculty: Studies indicate that
85% of faculty have had no training courses!
ž But, according to Derek Bok, in Our
Underachieving Colleges, 90% of college
professors believe their teaching is above
average!
ž Premise #1: students learn better when they
recognize their preferred learning style and
can make use of a variety of strategies
ž Premise #2: Faculty can enhance student
learning by incorporating multiple paths to
learning in their classes
ž Learning Style theory has developed over the
last 40 years, representing a shift away from
behavioral learning theory in educational
psychology
ž Approximately 70 theories have been
identified; none is complete in itself; each
focuses on some aspects of learning theory to
the omission of others
ž These theories draw from research in
psychology, education, etc. but often are
more intuitive than validated by hard
research
ž Some theories have achieved significant
commercial success because of marketing
efforts (but don’t have consistent research
validation)
ž However, some generalizations based on
work with these theories can be appropriated
by faculty in higher education settings
ž Cognitive learning theory provides more
objective/researched evidence (some
aspects to be presented today)
ž We
receive information through 4 primary
modalities:
¡ Visual (what do I see?)
¡ Auditory (what do I hear?)
¡ Tactile (What can I touch?)
¡ Kinesthetic (What can I manipulate or move?)
ž We
process information through 2 primary
approaches (cognitive style):
¡ Abstract (objective data management)
¡ Relational (personalized, connectedness)
ž Visual learners = 30% of students
ž Auditory learners = 25% of students
ž Tactile-kinesthetic learners = 15% of students
ž Mixed modalities = 30% of students
ž Modality = combination of perception and
memory or how the mind receives and stores
information
ž Visual: learner prefers images (30%)
ž Auditory: learner prefers words (25%)

ž Tactile/Kinesthetic: learner prefers doing,


touching, physical manipulation of objects
(15%)
ž Mixed modalities (30%)
ž Faculty should try to match their
instructional approach to the learning task
and if possible use multiple approaches (ex:
learning tennis by listening to a lecture is not
a good match—no pun intended!)
ž Multimodality instruction ≠ modality
matching for individual students
ž Matching can help lower-ability students
temporarily; mismatching can help higher-ability
students (because the system already ‘works’ for
them)
ž using only modality matching eventually puts all
students at a disadvantage because they need to
be able to use a variety of modalities(but it can
help a student who gets stuck and needs another
way to perceive the information)
ž Multimodality teaching = incorporating a variety of
approaches that eventually connect with all styles
ž Field sensitivity refers to the extent to which
an individual uses context in order to
understand and make sense of new
information
ž Field sensitivity is a facet of personality that
is relatively stable over time
ž this topic has been extensively researched
and shown to have validity regarding its
impact on learning
ž Autonomous learners, task- ž Socialized learners,
oriented, internally relationship-oriented,
motivated externally motivated
ž Deal well with discrete ž Deal well with information
items of information related to ‘the big picture’
ž Not affected by context; and/or personally
impose their own structure meaningful
on content ž Affected by context;
ž Can perform well in large require structure
classes and on open-ended ž Can perform well in small,
tests structured classes and on
ž Enjoy competition objective tests
ž Enjoy collaboration
ž Higher education tends to favor:
¡ field independent learners over field sensitive
learners
¡ Academic knowledge over experiential
¡ Verbal communication over visual
¡ information organized in linear fashion and
discrete point presentations over information
presented holistically

ž Students who tend to be field independent


learners are white European-American and Asian
males; students who tend to be field sensitive
include females, Native Americans, Afro-Americans
and Latinos (obviously with individual differences)
Teaching Styles

Assessment Learning
strategies styles
ž Since every individual has a preferred
learning style, the teacher who depends
exclusively on one preferred teaching style
puts up to 75% of his/her students at a
disadvantage
ž Students learn better when we select
content, activities and assessments with a
variety of learners in mind
ž expert/formal authority: imparts information,
concerned with correct way of doing things
ž personal model: encourages students to observe
then emulate instructor’s approach
ž Facilitator: emphasizes personal interaction with
students; guides and directs students by asking
questions, prompts, etc.
ž Delegator: resource person; develops students as
independent learners
For my Latin American Civ/Lit course, I had these scores:
Expert = 4.8
Formal authority = 3.7
Personal model = 3.1
Facilitator = 4.5
Delegator = 4.2
= the “delegator/facilitator/expert” cluster puts the burden of learning
on the students by emphasizing independent learning activities for
groups and individuals
ž uses a variety of modalities to deliver
content
ž uses a variety of instructional approaches,
matching the approach to the learning task
ž encourages students to be aware of their
preferred learning styles and to develop
flexibility (a variety of learning strategies)
ž Offers a variety of assessment measures so
that all students can work from their
strengths at various points during the course
ž For identifying your preferred learning style:
http://www.vark-learn.com/english/
page.asp?p=questionnaire
ž Take the Teaching Styles Inventory
http://fcrcweb.ftr.indstate.edu/
tstyles3.html

You might also like