Nylon Dyeing
Nylon Dyeing
Nylon Dyeing
Abstract
When nylon 6,6 was dyed with ®ve sulphur dyes using two reduction systems, dyeings on nylon 6,6 were of compar-
able depth of shade to dyeings produced on cotton. The dyeings on nylon 6,6 displayed very good fastness to repeated
washing and high resistance to oxygen bleach fading. The fastness of the dyeings to these agencies was enhanced by
means of an aftertreatment with a commercial cationic ®xing agent. Both the dry and wet rub fastness of the dyeings
was very good but the dyeings displayed poor fastness to light. # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Nylon 6,6; Sulphur dyes; Repeated wash fastness; UKTO test
to washing with detergent/perborate formulations Five sulphur dyes were chosen, arbitrarily; these
that are now common in domestic washing pow- are listed in Table 1. Leucad 71, a commercially
ders [4,5]. The so-called sulphur vat dyes or sul- available, aqueous solution of sodium sul®de
phurized vat dyes, which are either sulfur or vat and sodium sulfhydrate, was kindly supplied by
dyes that often are applied to cellulosic ®bres J Robinson Ltd. A commercial sample of the
using a dierent reduction system to that of sul- cationic ®xing agent Sol®x E was obtained from
phur dyes, display higher wet fastness and greater Ciba-Geigy and a commercial sample of the
resistance to bleaching than traditional sulphur non-ionic surfactant Lanapex R was provided
dyes on cellulosic ®bres [4,5]. by Uniqema. All other chemicals used were
In the context of nylon 6,6, sulphur dyes are laboratory grade reagents obtained from Aldrich.
used on blend materials, notably nylon/cellulosic
blends [6±8] and recent patent literature suggests 2.2. Procedures
continuing commercial interest in the application
of sulphur and sulphur vat dyes to nylon blend Four dyeing methods were used (Table 2) which
substrates [9±13]. In contrast, there appears to are designated methods 1, 2, 3 and 4. In each case,
have been little, if any, reference in the open lit- a 10:1 liquor ratio was used and dyeing was car-
erature to the use of the dyes on 100% nylon 6,6 ried out in 300 cm3 capacity sealed, stainless steel
since the 1939 study of the dyeability of the ®bre dyepots, housed in a Roaches Pyrotec S infrared
which concluded that sulphur dyes had very little dyeing machine.
substantivity for nylon ®bre and would not hold
much commercial importance for the dyer [14]. 2.2.1. Method 1
This paper describes the dyeing of nylon 6,6 This was the standard method recommended by
with sulphur dyes in deep shades using an exhaust J Robinson Ltd for the application of the Sulphosol
(immersion) dyeing method and an investigation of range of C.I. Solubilised Sulphur dyes to cotton. In
the fastness properties of the dyeings. In addition, this method, pre-wetted samples of cotton were
the eects on dyeability of a traditional, commer- dyed using Leucad 71 as reducing agent (Fig. 1);
cial, sulphide-based reduction system and a non at the end of dyeing, the samples were oxidised
sulphide-based reduction system are discussed. using the procedure described below.
2.2.2. Method 2
2. Experimental Nylon 6,6 was dyed following the method
shown in Fig. 1 using Leucad 71 as reduction sys-
2.1. Materials tem (Fig. 1); at the end of dyeing, the samples were
oxidised using the procedure described below.
Scoured, knitted, nylon 6,6 fabric (78f68, 1.15
dtex per ®lament) was kindly supplied by Du Pont 2.2.3. Method 3
UK; scoured, woven, ¯uorescent brightener-free Nylon 6,6 was dyed following the method
cotton fabric was obtained from Whaleys. shown in Fig. 2 using glucose/NaOH as reduction
Table 1
Sulphur dyes used
Table 2
Dyeing methods
Fig. 2. Method 3.
2.2.4. Method 4
This combined scouring and dyeing method
(Fig. 3) utilised a non-ionic surfactant (Lanapex
R) and glucose/NaOH as reduction system. At the
Fig. 3. Method 4.
end of dyeing, the samples were oxidised using the
procedure described below.
steel dyepots housed in a Roaches Pyrotec S
2.2.5. Oxidation infrared dyeing machine following the method
At the end of dyeing, the samples were rinsed shown in Fig. 4. At the end of aftertreatment, the
for 5 min in cold water and then for 5 min in hot dyed samples were rinsed in running cold water
(60 C) water and then oxidised, using a liquor for 5 min and allowed to dry in the open air.
ratio of 50:1, at 60 C in a bath containing 2 glÿ1
35% H2O2 at pH 4.5, for 15 min. At the end of 2.2.7. Wash-fastness
oxidation, the samples were rinsed in running cold The dyed fabric was subjected to ®ve con-
water for 5 min and allowed to dry in the open air. secutive ISO CO6/C2 [15] wash tests; at the end of
each wash test, the washed sample was rinsed
2.2.6. Aftertreatment with cationic ®xing agent thoroughly in tap water but was not dried. A fresh
The oxidised, sulphur dyed samples of cotton sample of SDC multi®bre strip was used to assess
and nylon 6,6 were aftertreated with Sol®x E in an the extent of staining for each of the ®ve wash
attempt to improve the wash fastness of the dye- tests. The extent of the staining of the adjacent
ings. Aftertreatment was carried out using a liquor multi®bre strip samples was expressed in the
ratio of 20:1 in 300 cm3 capacity, sealed stainless appropriate staining grey scale whereas the change
68 S.M. Burkinshaw et al. / Dyes and Pigments 45 (2000) 65±74
Table 3
Colorimetric data obtained for dyeing methods 1 (cotton) and 2 (nylon 6,6)
obtained for each of the dyes on the two dierent Figs. 6 and 7 also show that the aftertreatment
substrates reveals that the extent of dye loss was of both the cotton and the nylon 6,6 dyeings with
markedly lower for the nylon 6,6 dyeings. In turn, the commercial cationic ®xing agent, Sol®x E,
this result implies that the fastness, to repeated enhanced the fastness of the dyeings to repeated
wash testing, of the nylon 6,6 dyeings was superior wash testing. Previous work [17±19] has shown
to that of the corresponding dyeing on cotton. that the fastness to detergent/perborate washing of
Fig. 6 shows graphically the fk values obtained the oxidised dyeings of C.I. Solubilised Sulphur,
for the cotton dyeings quoted in Table 3 and C.I. Leuco Sulphur and C.I. Sulphur dyes on cot-
Fig. 7 shows the fk values secured for the nylon 6,6 ton was markedly improved by the use of cationic
dyeings. The reduction in colour strength that ®xing agents that were applied using simple
occurred as a result of ®ve repeated ISO CO6/C2 exhaust or continuous aftertreatment procedures.
wash tests is apparent, especially in the case of the It was postulated [17±19] that this improved wash
cotton dyeings. fastness could be attributed to:
70 S.M. Burkinshaw et al. / Dyes and Pigments 45 (2000) 65±74
. the formation of a large molecular size dye± to explain the enhancement of wash fastness
cationic agent of reduced aqueous solubility imparted by aftertreatment with the Sol®x E,
within the ®bre and/or; further work is clearly required to establish the
. the formation of a `layer' of the polymeric precise mechanism by which such enhanced wash
cationic ®xing agent at the periphery of the fastness is imparted.
dyed ®bre. When Figs. 6 and 7 are compared, it is obvious
that the nylon 6,6 dyeings underwent considerably
It was considered that such a mechanism would less reduction in colour strength during repeated
lower the rate at which the dye diused out of the wash testing than the corresponding cotton dye-
dyed substrate during washing and thus improve ings. The grey scale ratings of the stained adjacent
wash fastness. However, while no direct evidence cotton and nylon 6,6 materials after wash testing
was obtained to support this mechanism, indirect (Table 4) clearly show that the extent of staining
evidence, in the form of ®ndings reported in other of the adjacent nylon 6,6 and cotton fabrics was
publications, was advanced [17±19]. Whilst it considerably lower in the case of the nylon 6,6
seems reasonable to propose that the above dyeings.
mechanism could be applied to the present work In Table 4, when the grey scale ratings for the
aftertreated dyeings are compared to those
secured for the non-aftertreated dyeings, it is clear
Table 4
Staining results obtained using dyeing method 1 (cotton) and
method 2 (nylon 6,6)a
Yellow 23
1 3 (3/4) 3/4 (3/4) 3/4 (4) 4 (4/5)
2 3 (3/4) 3/4 (4) 3/4 (4) 4 (4/5)
3 4 (3/4) 4 (4) 4 (4/5) 4 (5)
4 4 (4) 4 (4/5) 4 (4/5) 4/5 (5)
5 4 (4/5) 4/5 (4/5) 4/5 (4/5) 4/5 (5)
Green 2
Fig. 6. fk values for cotton dyed using method 1. 1 3 (3) 3 (3/4) 4 (4) 4 (4/5)
2 3 (3/4) 3 (3/4) 4 (4) 4/5 (4/5)
3 3 (3/4) 3/4 (3/4) 4 (4/5) 5 (5)
4 3 (3/4) 3/4 (4) 4 (4/5) 5 (5)
5 3/4 (4) 3/4 (4) 4/5 (5) 5 (5)
Red 6
1 2/3 (3/4) 5 (5) 5 (5) 5 (5)
2 2/3 (3/4) 5 (5) 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
3 3 (3/4) 5 (5) 4/5 (5) 5 (5)
4 3 (4) 5 (5) 5 (5) 5 (5)
5 3/4 (4) 5 (5) 5 (5) 5 (5)
Blue 7
1 2 (2/3) 5 (5) 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
2 2 (2/3) 5 (5) 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
3 2 (3) 5 (5) 5 (5) 5 (5)
4 3 (3) 5 (5) 5 (5) 5 (5)
5 3 (4) 5 (5) 5 (5) 5 (5)
a
Fig. 7. fk values for nylon 6,6 dyed using method 2. Figures in brackets refer to Sol®x E aftertreated samples.
S.M. Burkinshaw et al. / Dyes and Pigments 45 (2000) 65±74 71
Table 5 Green 2
Colorimetic data obtained for nylon 6,6 using dyeing method 3 1 4 (4) 4/5 (4/5)
Dye Aftertreatment Washes L* a* b* E 2 4 (4) 4/5 (4/5)
3 4 (4/5) 5 (5)
Yellow 23 Nil 0 67.1 10.3 59.4 3.4 4 4 (4/5) 5 (5)
5 72.6 7.3 63.2 5 4/5 (5) 5 (5)
Sol®x E 0 65.8 10.2 58.6 1.4
5 68.2 8.9 60.2 Red 6
1 4 (4) 5 (5)
Green 2 Nil 0 22.5 ÿ19.4 ÿ5.9 1.0
5 22.7 ÿ20.2 ÿ7.2 2 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
Sol®x E 0 23.2 ÿ19.6 ÿ5.8 0.9 3 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
5 23.0 ÿ19.0 ÿ6.9 4 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
5 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
Red 6 Nil 0 33.1 18.4 3.9 2.4
5 36.5 20.0 5.1 Blue 7
Sol®x E 0 34.8 18.7 5.3 1.0 1 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
5 36.1 19.8 5.7 2 4/5 (4/5) 5 (5)
Blue 7 Nil 0 16.5 2.2 ÿ16.0 2.6 3 4/5 (5) 5 (5)
5 16.4 4.1 ÿ18.7 4 4/5 (5) 5 (5)
Sol®x E 0 15.9 2.1 ÿ16.4 0.6 5 5 (5) 5 (5)
5 15.8 2.3 ÿ17.2
a
Figures in brackets refer to Sol®x E aftertreatted samples.
72 S.M. Burkinshaw et al. / Dyes and Pigments 45 (2000) 65±74
higher dyeing temperature used in method 3 may protocol that was designed to identify coloured
be a contributory factor. cotton fabrics susceptible to oxygen bleach fading
The staining ratings displayed in Table 6 clearly through repeated washing with domestic deter-
show the high fastness of the nylon 6,6 dyeings gents. Consequently, sulphur dyeings on cellulosic
to repeated wash testing and also, that after- ®bres can be expected to show poor fastness to the
treatment with the cationic ®xing agent enhanced UKTO test method, as was demonstrated [16,20]
this fastness. for several sulphur dyes. According to the UKTO
As mentioned earlier, while sulphur dyes on methodology, when the colour dierence [E
cellulosic ®bres possess moderate to good fastness CMC (2,1)] between a dyed cotton sample before
to light and wet treatments, they are much less and after testing is <4 units, the sample is con-
resistant to washing with detergent/perborate for- sidered to be robust to oxygen bleach fading while
mulations that are now common in domestic a E>4 units indicates bleach sensitivity.
washing powders. The recently introduced UKTO Table 7 shows the colorimetric data obtained for
test method [16,20] is a diagnostic single wash test cotton which had been dyed using the commercial
Table 7
Colorimetric data obtained for the UKTO wash test
Table 9
Table 11
Light fastness of sulphur dyes on nylon 6,6
Colorimetric data obtained for a deep black shade on nylon 6,6
Dye Wet
Test Wash L* a* b* fK E
Yellow 23 1±2
CO6/C2 0 12.7 1.0 ÿ1.5 554.7 0.9
Green 2 2
5 12.2 1.2 ÿ2.0 563.7
Red 7 2
Blue 7 3/4 UKTO 0 12.4 1.0 ÿ1.5 560.2 1.0
Black 11 >4 1 11.9 1.2 ÿ2.0 587.4
Table 10
Colorimetric data obtained using conventional dye after scour and combined scour and dye methods
Process L* a* b* C h fk
Yellow 23
Dyed after scouring 67.1 10.3 59.4 60.3 80.2 60.8
Combined scour and dye 65.8 10.2 58.6 69.5 80.1 65.6
Green 2
Dyed after scouring 22.5 ÿ19.4 ÿ5.9 20.3 196.9 314.7
Combined scour and dye 22.7 ÿ19.6 ÿ5.8 20.4 196.5 30.92
Blue 7
Dyed after scouring 16.5 2.2 ÿ16.0 16.2 277.8 348.8
Combined scour and dye 16.9 2.0 ÿ16.4 16.5 277.1 337.7
74 S.M. Burkinshaw et al. / Dyes and Pigments 45 (2000) 65±74
Table 10 shows the colorimetric data obtained for on nylon 6,6 showed excellent wet and rub fast-
nylon 6,6 samples which had been dyed using the ness but the light fastness of the dyeings was poor.
combined scouring and dyeing process (method 4) The study implies that sulphur dyes may provide
that used the glucose/NaOH reduction system as an alternative to metallised acid dyes in obtaining
well as the corresponding data secured when nylon economical, deep shades on nylon 6,6, especially
6,6 had been dyed after scouring using method 3 for outlets where high light fastness is not an issue.
(glucose/NaOH). Investigation of the results dis- Eorts are now being focussed to improve the
played in Table 10 shows that there was little dif- light fastness of the dyeings and to extend the dye
ference, between the two dyeing methods used, in colour gamut.
terms of both the colour and the colour strength
of the dyeings.
Perhaps the most important shade that could be References
obtained using sulphur dyes on nylon 6,6 would
be a deep black. Currently, a fast, deep black [1] Burkinshaw SM. In: Hallas G, Waring D, editors. The
shade on nylon 6,6 is obtained using pre-metal- chemistry and application of dyes. New York: Plenum,
lised acid dyes in conjunction with a commercial 1990.
[2] Burkinshaw SM. Chemical principles of synthetic ®bre
aftertreatment. dyeing. London: Blackie Acad. & Prof, 1997.
Table 11 shows the colorimetric data secured for [3] Blackburn RS, Burkinshaw SM, Collins GW, Gandhi K,
a deep shade obtained when C.I. Sulphur Black 11 Gotsopoulos A, Wills AE. Con¯uences: fashioning inter-
was applied to nylon 6,6 using method 3 (glucose/ cultural perspectives. Lyon: Universite de Mode, 1997.
[4] Senior C. In: Shorre J, editor. Cellulosics dyeing. Brad-
NaOH), both before and after ®ve repeated ISO
ford: SDC, 1995.
CO6/C2 wash tests and the UKTO test method. [5] Clarke D, Senior C. In: Preston C, editor. The dyeing of
The very high fastness of the dyeing is obvious. cellulosic ®bres. Bradford: SDC, 1986.
[6] Cheetham RC. Dyeing ®bre blends. London: Van Nos-
trand, 1966.
4. Conclusions [7] Shore J. In: Shore J, editor. Colorants and auxiliaries, vol.
2. Bradford: Society of Dyers and Colourists, 1990.
[8] Shore J. Blends dyeing. Bradford: Society of Dyers and
Nylon 6,6 can be dyed with selected sulphur Colourists, 1998.
dyes using a sulphide-based reduction system that is [9] Diamond Shamrock, US patent 4531946 A, 1985.
intended for the application of the dyes to cellu- [10] Toray, JP patent 61019889 A, 1986.
losic ®bres. However, the use of a glucose/NaOH [11] Ciba-Geigy DE Patent 19613671 A, 1996.
[12] Toyobo, JP Patent 10025670 A, 1998.
reduction system enabled dyeings of higher colour [13] Kurakay Co, EP Patent 833005 A, 1998.
yield and wash fastness to be achieved. The fast- [14] Stott PH. Amer Dyest Rep 1939;28:582.
ness of sulphur dyeings on nylon 6,6 to repeated [15] Anon. Standard methods for the determination of the
wash testing in the presence of bleach was superior colour fastness of textiles and leather. 5th ed. Society of
Dyers and Colourists, 1990.
to that of comparable dyeings on cotton. The sul-
[16] Phillips DAS, Duncan M, Jenkins E, Bevan G, Lloyd J,
phur dyeings on nylon 6,6 also showed very good Homeister J. J Soc Dyers Col 1996;112:289.
resistance to oxygen bleach fading insofar as many [17] Burkinshaw SM, Collins GW, Gordon R. Proceedings of
of the sulphur dyes used on nylon 6,6 satis®ed the the AATCC International Conference, Atlanta, 1995.
criterion of the UKTO test method. The observed [18] Burkinshaw SM, Collins GW. Dyes and Pigments
1995;29:323.
resistance to both repeated wash testing and the
[19] Burkinshaw SM, Collins GW, Gordon R. Proceedings of
UKTO test method was found to be enhanced by the AATCC International Conference, Nashville, 1996.
aftertreating the sulphur dyed fabric with a com- [20] Phillips DAS, Duncan M, Graydon A, Bevan G, Lloyd J,
mercial, cationic ®xing agent. The sulphur dyeings Harbon C, Homeister J. J Soc Dyers Col 1996;113:289.