The Project Sustainability Logbook - 1st Edition 2013
The Project Sustainability Logbook - 1st Edition 2013
The Project Sustainability Logbook - 1st Edition 2013
SUSTAINABILITY LOGBOOK
This 2013 Project Sustainability Logbook (PSL) - is essentially identical to the draft of the
Project Sustainability Logbook (PSL2012) published by the European Federation of Engineering
Consultancy Associations (EFCA) and the International Federation of Consulting Engineers
(FIDIC, from its acronym in French) in 2012 and released at the FIDIC World Consulting
Engineering Conference in Seoul, South Korea, in September 2012.
The aim behind the Logbook is to accompany a built asset or a group of designated
buildings, infrastructure facilities and physical plant of a component of the urban
environment (for example, a city district or a city block, respectively) or is designed to meet a
specific urban function (for example, public transport or water supply).
The Logbook, comprising a series of tables, offers a method of defining and monitoring the
issues and objectives of sustainable development for a specific project or programme.
The Logbook includes the present document and accompanying software. Both are covered
by copyright, and all reproduction rights are reserved.
Use of this version of the PSL is conditional upon acceptance of the following:
The PSL can be used free-of-charge by any user who will be responsible for ensuring that:
1. the use does not infringe in any way intellectual property or all other existing rights;
2. clear and explicit references are made to the PSL trademark and the year of
publication;
3. the contents of PSL, notably columns A, B and C of the PSL monitoring tables,
are not altered and must be made easily accessible in their entirety and without
modification, and strictly adhere to the requirements of the relevant version of the PSL
user guidelines.
Under these conditions, the PSL can be referred to in a contractual relationship for which the
parties are solely responsible, and it can be used and referred to in every step taken towards
the realisation of a project or programme for which a user or group of users is entirely
responsible.
Contents
1.3. TRANSPARENCY 13
1.3.1. Implementing of monitoring 13
1.3.2. Implementing certification 13
1.3.3. Dedicated communications 13
2. SOCIAL/SOCIETY 14
2.1. HEALTH AND SAFETY 14
2.1.1. Hygiene and air quality 14
2.1.2. Other health risks (electromagnetic, laser light, etc) 14
2.1.3. Safety: access and exits, operation, etc. by neighbours, users and others 14
2.1.4. Ensuring security during maintenance 14
2.2. SOCIAL COHESION AND EMPLOYMENT 14
2.2.1. Professional insertion and return to work 14
2.2.2. Job creation 15
2.2.3. Fighting exclusion; personal mobility 15
2.2.4. Facilitating access to services (employment, education, etc.) 15
2.2.5. Facilitating accesses and exits 15
2.2.6. Forced displacement of people 15
2.2.7. Poverty alleviation 16
3. ENVIRONMENT 19
3.1. BIODIVERSITY 19
3.1.1. Preservation of natural habitats 19
3.1.2. Maintaining ecological corridors 19
3.1.3. Tackling light and sound pollution 19
3.1.4. Supporting inherited plant species 20
4. ECONOMIC 23
4.1. SOCIO-ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION 23
4.1.1. Of the project or programme in the short tem 23
4.1.2. Envisaged future of the project or programme; capability to evolve 23
4.1.3. Serviceability 23
4.1.4. Investment efficiency 23
Annex:
Monitoring tables for sustainable development of a specific project or programme 26
1. Overall monitoring table 26
2. Monitoring table for planning phase 28
3. Monitoring table for design phase 30
4. Monitoring table for construction phase 32
5. Monitoring table for operation phase 34
6. Monitoring table for end-of-life 36
Introducing the Project Sustainability Logbook
1. Preface 2. PSL – a coordinated commitment to
sustainable development
Respecting statutory norms and regulations and the like is
a primary working concern for everyone contributing to the The PSL responds to the need to integrate the requirements of
planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of sustainable development, using a holistic approach, throughout
projects or programmes. A project or programme may consist the life of a project or programme from the initial planning
of a built asset or a group of designated buildings, infrastructure stage. A PSL can be used for all types of projects or programmes
facilities and physical plant forming all or part of a component including buildings, services infrastructure and industrial plant
of the urban environment (city district, city block) or being – both new and existing – at all stages from planning and
designed to meet a specific urban function (public transport, design through to construction, operation and end-of-life. All
water supply). dimensions of sustainability are taken up – economic, social,
environmental, holistic, and governance.
These activities have traditionally centered on the three goals
of optimising of time, cost and performance. Sustainable A leading authority has remarked:
development has introduced new requirements that may ‘Sustainable development represents the search for a
eventually be regulated and which encourage many stakeholders ‘global quality’ that integrates, aside from the life-cycle
to undertake specific initiatives going beyond the legal costs, all aspects of quality which, in the case of a
requirements. built asset, will notably include the capacity to evolve,
durability, integration into the environment, and of course
Sustainability initiatives are made difficult by the proliferation the architectural quality. These features, which cover
of analytical frameworks and heterogeneous methodologies. many externalities, are however neither measurable nor
Moreover, these initiatives should not be limited to the design or quantifiable in monetary terms. It is for this reason that
renovation of plant and built assets but should address projects the Logbook, which aims to be both progressive and
and programmes, including urban programmes, throughout the pragmatic, has as its priority those issues that influence
entire life-cycle of their components. directly or indirectly the nominal value of the goods and
services which form the basis for public procurement. An
FIDIC and EFCA, the federations representing the consulting overview of all the factors must not be lost from sight when
engineering industry throughout the world and in Europe, developing a procurement strategy and then taking a
individually, support the industry’s development of the pragmatic decision’.
actions and tools which are needed to implement the goals of
sustainable development within projects and programmes. A PSL is a technical and organisational tool that can be used:
- to support a sustainability initiative since it proposes
To bring sustainable development into perspective, FIDIC
benchmarks and a framework for rating all phases of
has developed Project Sustainability Management (PSM),
a project or programme that allow the life-cycle cost to
which was revised in 2013, as a methodology for evaluating
be estimated based upon a clear-cut evaluation of the
the sustainability requirements for industrial, building and performance that is to be maintained, and even improved,
infrastructure projects. during the life of the project or programme;
In line with this methodology, consulting engineers developed - to integrate, at the community level, sustainable
jointly with architects and local government representatives development objectives and assessment, which are
the 2012 draft of the Project Sustainability Logbook (PSL). The monitored by means of a customised PSL;
Logbook was reviewed by international experts representing - to support a systemic or holistic approach to the
both FIDIC and EFCA and published in 2013 as PSL2013. In development and operation of buildings, infrastructure
supporting sustainable development throughout the life of plant and plant so as to improve the global efficiency of the
or a built asset, PSL represents an unique tool for facilitating communities in which they are located.
discussions between political authorities, clients, project Moreover, PSL encourages holistic approaches for cities and
managers, engineers, designers, contractors, and operators and urban communities by aiming to reinforce urban planning
indeed all who aim to promote sustainable development. and development. The Rethink Cities white paper published in
Sustainable development can both reduce emissions and The PSL is also relevant for the management of the sustainable
vulnerability to climate change and many impacts can be development of an existing project or programme. It can
avoided, reduced or delayed. Appropriate urban planning, be used in part or in its entirety by senior management to
including extending green areas as well as cool roofs in encourage discussion with stakeholders (financial, political,
cities, has proved to be an efficient way of limiting the technical, etc).
‘heat island’ effect, thereby reducing cooling needs and The PSL thereby testifies to an initiative for global quality in
sometimes also urban fires. a way that is clearly stated, easily identified, and of value
for stakeholders. It is the instrument of choice for coming to
The PSL provides an overview of all the issues stemming from
grips with the life-cycle cost of the components of a project or
regulations and possible voluntary undertakings. It results in a
programme.
clear appreciation of the issues thereby helping in ranking the
issues and making the engagement for sustainable development A PSL comprises a preamble outlining the rules to be followed
more coherent. and for its updating together with the three sections that need to
be maintained throughout the life of an asset, namely:
A PSL does not replace certification and rating systems. Instead it
offers a consolidated and organised overview, bringing forward - an updated description of the asset and the sustainable
the most significant considerations. In particular, an analysis by development challenges,
FIDIC and EFCA has indicated that many of the 14 PSL themes - an overall monitoring table from sustainable development
(sub-divided in the present version into 63 issues or objectives) perspective comprising 15 or more parameters or
which should be considered for infrastructure or plant are also indicators and the manner in which each is evaluated,
taken up by the main indicator and assessment frameworks for - a schedule of documents comprising a list of standards,
buildings such as BREAM and LEED. ratings, benchmarks, and the procedures that are used for
their evaluation, records detailing changes and statements
The PSL also allows one to extend considerations, both technical of earlier measures and indeed any document which is
and financial, beyond legal requirements and regulations across useful for maintaining the Logbook.
some or all dimensions of sustainability with maximum effect and
Establishing the PSL may commence in the initial planning
within the scope agreed with the project or programme’s senior
stages of a project
management.
The PSL is designed to accompany a project or programme from
3. PSL at a glance
the moment it is ‘invented’ all the way through to the end-of-life
A PSL undertaking is entirely voluntary of the project or programme’s components. It therefore
integrates the modifications and more important adjustments
A PSL undertaking for a built asset is in principle the
which are brought to a project or programme and the way in
responsibility of an ‘owner’ or the owner’s representative.
which the setting changes in terms of location, technicalities,
However, there is nothing to prevent an existing or future
regulatory environment, etc.
stakeholder from proposing the PSL to the owner, for instance
as part of the engineering design in a proposal. For an existing The PSL can also be created for an existing built asset on the
facility it may be difficult, nevertheless, to make full use of all basis of an overall evaluation and, if necessary, with the asset
PSL tables
The collection of tables that make up the PSL comprises:
- a summary table which describes the works or group or
works or plant being addressed by the PSL;
- an overall monitoring table;
- monitoring tables for the implementation and operation
phases covering:
planning phase
design phase
construction phase
operation phase
end-of-life.
A B C
Domain Theme Issue or objective
1. Governance 1.1 Oversight 1.1.1. Risk Management
1.1.2. Cross-cutting
1.1.3. Innovation
1.1.4. Strategies for selecting: site, materials, multi-criteria
decision analysis
1.2 1.2.1. The response to a local request
Stakeholder 1.2.2. Information, consultation and coordination
involvement 1.2.3. Specific organisational aspects of the construction phase
1.2.4. Staff and user awareness
1.3 1.3.1. Implementing monitoring
Transparency 1.3.2. Implementing certification
1.3.3. Dedicated communications
2. Social/Society 2.1 2.1.1. Hygiene and air quality
Health/Safety 2.1.2. Other health risks (electromagnetic, laser light, etc.)
2.1.3. Safety: access and exits, operation, etc. by neighbours,
users and others
2.1.4. Ensuring safety and security during maintenance
2.2. Social 2.2.1. Professional insertion and return to work
cohesion and 2.2.2. Job creation
employment 2.2.3. Fighting exclusion; personal mobility
2.2.4. Facilitating access to services (employment, education, etc.)
2.2.5. Facilitating accesses and exits
2.2.6. Forced displacement of people
2.2.7. Poverty alleviation
2.3. Living 2.3.1. Respect for the neighbours’ and users’ living
environment environment
2.3.2. Thermal comfort; climatic comfort
2.3.3. Acoustic comfort
2.3.4. Visual comfort
2.3.5. Quality of the indoor and outdoor environments
2.3.6. Integration into the site; integration into the landscape
2.4. Cultural 2.4.1. Enhancing the cultural identity
diversity 2.4.2. Landscape quality
2.4.3. Respect for the built heritage
2.4.4. Respect for the natural heritage
A B C D E F
Domain Theme Issue or Objective Priority
I: Issue
O: Objective
X: No distinction 1 2 3
1. Governance 1.1 Oversight 1.1.1. Risk Management O
1.1.2. Cross-cutting O
1.1.3. Innovation
1.1.4. Strategies for selecting: site, materials, I
multi-criteria decision analysis
1.2 1.2.1. The response to a local request I
Stakeholder 1.2.2. Information, consultation and coordination O
involvement 1.2.3. Specific organisational aspects of the O
construction phase
1.2.4. Staff and user awareness O
1.3 1.3.1. Implementing monitoring O
Transparency 1.3.2. Implementing certification
1.3.3. Dedicated communications
2. Social/Society 2.1 2.1.1. Hygiene and air quality I
Health/Safety 2.1.2. Other health risks (electromagnetic, laser light,
etc.)
2.1.3. Safety: access and exits, operation, etc.
by neighbours, users and others.
2.1.4. Ensuring safety and security during maintenance I
2.2 Social 2.2.1. Professional insertion and return to work O
cohesion and 2.2.2. Job creation I
employment 2.2.3. Fighting exclusion; personal mobility
2.2.4. Facilitating access to services (employment,
education, etc)
2.2.5. Facilitating accesses and exits I
2.2.6. Forced displacement of people
2.3 Living 2.3.1. Respect for the neighbours’ and users’ living
environment environment
2.3.2. Thermal comfort; climatic comfort I
2.3.3. Acoustic comfort
2.3.4. Visual comfort
2.3.5. Quality of the indoor and outdoor environments
2.3.6. Integration into the site; integration into the O
landscape
2.4 Cultural 2.4.1. Enhancing the cultural identity I
diversity 2.4.2. Landscape quality O
2.4.3. Respect for the built heritage O
2.4.4. Respect for the natural heritage
The Project Sustainability Logbook
8
A B C D E F
Domain Theme Issue or Objective Priority
I: Issue
O: Objective
X: No distinction 1 2 3
2. Social/Society 2.4 Cultural 2.4.1. Enhancing the cultural identity I
diversity 2.4.2. Landscape quality O
2.4.3. Respect for the built heritage O
2.4.4. Respect for the natural heritage
3. Environment 3.1 3.1.1. Preservation of natural habitats
Biodiversity 3.1.2. Maintaining ecological corridors I
3.1.3. Tackling light and sound pollution
3.1.4. Supporting inherited plant species I
3.2 Climate 3.2.1. Controlling emissions from the project I
change or programme
3.2.2. Controlling emissions from induced traffic
3.2.3. Reducing the dependence on fossil-fuel
derived energy
3.2.4. Adapting to climate change
3.3 Resource 3.3.1. Controlling energy production, consumption I
management and distribution
3.3.2. Renewable energy use I
3.3.3. Controlling water resources
3.3.4. Controlling raw materials’ use
3.3.5. Consideration of materials life-cycle
3.4 Waste 3.4.1. Limiting air pollution
management 3.4.2. Waste management
3.4.3. Protection of water tables, watercourses and soil
3.4.4. Limiting hydraulic and hydrogeological impacts O
4. Economic 4.1 Economic 4.1.1. Of the constructed works in the short term
justification 4.1.2. Envisaged future of the works;
capability to evolve
4.1.3. Serviceability O
4.1.4. Investment efficiency
4.2 Economic 4.2.1. Direct economic impacts O
development 4.2.2. Induced and indirect economic impacts
4.2.3. Regional development
4.2.4. Job creation
4.2.5. Partnerships
4.2.6. Synergies with other developments
4.3 Life-cycle 4.3.1. Simple evaluation (investment and operation I
costing and maintenance)
4.3.2. Whole life-cycle costing (including external
costs, dismantling and costs avoided)
4.3.3. Risk limitation costs I
For the features listed below, the client should clarify or confirm Here, it is indirectly the overall relevance of the project or
the selection criteria so the selections made be validated. programme that is the underlying issue. One needs to ensure
Items to clarify are: that the specific interests of certain individuals (for instance,
- For a civil works project location: the choice should not neighbours) are reconciled with the general interest, which is
lead to constraints that may jeopardise the project, for often at odds with the specific interests.
instance, the presence of a residential building or housing
estate or a distant location with difficult access.
1.2.2. Information, consultation and
- Boundary of the works (the area affected by the works), coordination
project or programme, especially an urban programme. This issue addresses the interaction with interested parties (those
- Involvement of occupiers, users, neighbours, and other affected by the project or programme) throughout the life of the
stakeholders. project or programme.
- Extent to which systems take sustainable development
into consideration: a system-by-system analysis of Stakeholders: these are very varied. Included are professionals
sustainable-development features confirming whether whose competence is needed for the project, citizens, future
they include a life-cycle analysis of materials; a carbon users (staff and service consumers), the owner or senior
footprint; resource efficiency; the development and use of management, architects and engineers, future management,
an ‘environmental and health report card’ covering each neighbours, the politicians who are responsible, elected officials,
part of the works, the (industrial) product, if any, and the local authorities, local associations, insurance companies, etc.
urban impact.
- Project phases being considered (planning, design, Information, consultation, interaction, and reformulation
construction, operation, recycling, etc.). promotes decisions being taken that are as consensual and
- Consideration of criteria concerning an industrial product, transparent as possible, thus allowing all those involved in
confidentiality constraints and similar issues. the project or programme to make the most of advice from
interested parties and to manage different points of view.
1.2. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
Aside from obligatory regulations, one needs to ensure that
1.2.1. The response to a local request coordination at key stages, especially documents for public
The project or programme will generally reflect a request (social, debate:
economic, environmental) or a local initiative in response to a - gathers together the needs and expectations during the
demand , for which the motives can be varied. It is necessary feasibility stage
to articulate and scope the project or programme so that it - integrates future users into the jury for a prize competition,
matches that demand, and to confirm that it falls within the if any
policies for sustainable development of the local authorities
- involves stakeholders before the design phase, and
involved.
specifically before validation of the preliminary design
The project or programme can, for example, reflect local - uses powerful practical methods for project visualisation,
Agenda 21 or environmental objectives, an energy-climate plan such as a digital model, as far upstream as possible
or political undertakings. - provides several variants of the project or programme
Stakeholders involved in the project or programme, after having - informs interested parties on the progress and validation of
defined its content, have much to gain by re-examining the the project or programme and invites them to react to and
demand across all dimensions of sustainable development and adopt the project or programme
by enlarging the scope by envisaging all the repercussions, - involves interested parties in choices relating to the design
both positive and negative. They will thus ensure a long-term or finishing
perspective, even though such a vision is not articulated by those
- makes known the difficulties that may arise in reconciling
seeking to meet the demand.
all objectives, whether financial, legal, technical, or
The demand can also refer to an existing benchmark (notably targeting specific requirements
For example, it is important to maintain deadlines for validating Arrangements for this commitment to transparency should be
key phases with experts, the incorporation during upstream organised in the way that is most appropriate for the issues. They
phases of environmental specialists or landscape architects, and could extend to establishing a permanent monitoring committee
adherence to the facility’s optimum operating conditions in order with the possibility of appointing outsiders as members. The
to minimise resource consumption. committee will guarantee the transparency that is defined by the
committee’s membership and way of working.
Staff awareness can be developed through meetings, special
attractions during a ‘sustainable development week’, email It should be noted that public sector authorities often make
use of an Agenda 21 approach to support and govern their
messages or a blog, a brochure, and the like. To respond to
sustainable development initiatives.
questions and to gauge understanding, it is important to meet
people: simply circulating a brochure won’t do. 1.3.2. Implementing certification
The adjoining instructions distributed to site workers and the Implementing a recognised certification such as a
occasion they are presented offer ideal opportunities to flag standards-based environmental management system based
up the need to respect the environment, neighbours and site on ISO 14001, a rating such as BREAM, LEED, HQE, etc. or
cleanliness. Explanations and supporting material should be certifications covering certain PSL objectives needs to be clarified
adapted to the experience of staff, from the cleaning lady to the by referring to information regarding the proposed certification
managing director. that allows one to understand the certification’s relevance in
relation to PSL objectives.
Messages for users should be adjusted depending upon
the frequency with which a user visits a facility. For example, 1.3.3. Dedicated communications
daily e-mail messages to remind staff in a building to turn off
Dedicated communications adapted to correspond to the
equipment on leaving or occasional notices urging motorists to challenges at hand, and under the control of the monitoring
separate out their rubbish at motorway rest areas. committee, if any, should report upon the results achieved for the
During operation it is useful for staff and users to be informed PSL objectives.
periodically of the facility’s performance, the improvements and In general, it is preferable to draw upon the initiatives already
the possible deviations from plan and of the corrective measures in place, for example, a monitoring committee, and upon
that are being proposed, if they are involved. Site notices, instruments under its direct control such as a project website, the
publications and an active website are all tools that can be project owner’s or senior management website, etc. In the case
exploited. of major projects, there is often a site bulletin.
The project or programme owner or senior management can Also to be included are the means, such as information,
also finance a project that is carried out by an association communication and telecommunications infrastructure for
or a specialised organisation belonging to another project distance working, and the incentives and possibilities the project
owner, thereby creating involvement and support for the proper or programme provides for encouraging behaviour that reduces
implementation of the project or programme. emissions.
Note: hydrogeology is defined as an interdisciplinary science The serviceability expresses the capacity for the constructed
works to reply satisfactorily to the various user expectations.
that deals with underground water. In this section one only takes
From the economic point of view, an appropriate serviceability
into account the distribution and circulation of underground
can have both direct and indirect economic impacts:
water, where the quality aspects of water are covered under the
preceding issue. - direct impact on the built works since satisfactory
performance allows one to avoid early investments to
The problems encountered relate to flooding, soil erosion and remedy malfunctioning in use and reduces in the middle-
falling water tables. This issue covers hydraulic aspects linked to long-term the risk of functional obsolescence
to the project or programme, such as the impermeabilisation - indirect impact on the built works since a satisfactory
of soils, subtraction at the expansion zone of junctions and serviceability will bring about improved productivity (for
damming. It may also concern, for example, the drying up of places of work) or success (for educational establishments).
wells or humid zones owing to the modification of water runoff.
Alternatively, the concept of serviceability can be analysed
It is necessary in this case to fight against the impermeabilisation equally well in relation to the social context because it is linked
of soils, the concentration of waste rainwater runoff, and the to the quality of the surroundings, and to comfort (acoustic,
creation of blockages in both major and minor river beds. It is thermal, visual) as well as to ergonomy and to health and
up to the project or programme owner to demonstrate how these safety. Interactions with governance also need to be monitored
impacts will be taken into account and their effects reduced. such as the involvement of stakeholders, or more exactly, the
consideration of user needs and expectations.
In certain specific cases it may be desirable that a linear
embankment acts as a protection dyke for the downstream 4.1.4. Investment efficiency
population. In this case the hydraulic ’transparency‘ that is
Does the investment allow the objectives that were established
normally sought will be reduced. Such choices should be stated
to be reached with a minimum of financial resources envisaged
explicitly and justified.
and subsequently taken up? Does the investment consider the
life-cycle and operational costs and the environmental impact as
4. ECONOMIC components of the decision to invest?
Annex
Monitoring tables for the sustainable development of a specific project or programme
1. Overall monitoring table
2. Monitoring table for planning phase
3. Monitoring table for design phase
4. Monitoring table for construction phase
5. Monitoring table for operation phase
6. Monitoring table for end-of-life
- 0 - OVERALL MONITORING
- 0 - OVERALL TABLE
MONITORING - Version
TABLE 2013-R0
- Version 2013-R0
A B B C C
ISSUE ISSUE
OR OBJECTIVE
OR OBJECTIVE
ION DIMENSION THEME THEME
In columns
In D-E-F:
columnsI D-E-F:
= Issue,
I =O = Objective,
Issue, X = No
O = Objective, difference
X = No difference
1.1.1. Risk Management
1.1.1. Risk Management
1.1.2. Cross-cutting
1.1.2. Cross-cutting
1.1 - OVERSIGHT 1.1 - OVERSIGHT
1.1.3. Innovation
1.1.3. Innovation
1 - GOVERNANCE
1.1.4. Strategies
1.1.4. for selecting:
Strategies site, materials,
for selecting: multi-criteria
site, materials, decision
multi-criteria analysis,
decision etc.
analysis, etc.
1.2.1. The response
1.2.1. The to a local to
response request
a local request
1.2.2. Information, consultation
1.2.2. Information, and coordination
consultation and coordination
1.2 - STAKEHOLDER
1.2 - INVOLVEMENT
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
1.2.3. Specific organisational
1.2.3. aspects aspects
Specific organisational of the construction phase
of the construction phase
1.2.4. Staff and
1.2.4.user
Staffawareness
and user awareness
1.3.1. Implementing monitoring
1.3.1. Implementing monitoring
1.3 - TRANSPARENCY
1.3 - TRANSPARENCY 1.3.2. Implementing certification
1.3.2. Implementing certification
1.3.3. Dedicated
1.3.3. communications
Dedicated communications
2.1.1. Hygiene and
2.1.1. air quality
Hygiene and air quality
2.1.2. Other2.1.2.
health risks
Other (electromagnetic,
health laser light,
risks (electromagnetic, laser etc.)
light, etc.)
2.1 - HEALTH / SAFETY
2.1 - HEALTH / SAFETY
2.1.3. Safety: access
2.1.3. and
Safety: exits,and
access operation, etc. byetc.
exits, operation, neighbours,
by neighbours, users andand
users others
others
2.1.4. Ensuring
2.1.4.safety andsafety
Ensuring security during maintenance
and security during maintenance
2.2.1. Professional insertion and
2.2.1. Professional return
insertion andtoreturn
workto work
2.2.2. Job creation
2.2.2. Job creation
2.2.3. Fighting exclusion;
2.2.3. personalpersonal
Fighting exclusion; mobilitymobility
2 - SOCIAL / SOCIETY
ew tables-24-07-2013.xls/Overall/
new tables-24-07-2013.xls/Overall/
The Project Sustainability Logbook
26
xemple Modèle Exemple Modèle
ojet : qui?, rédaction : projet
qui?, : mise en forme: qui?,
qui?, rédaction : P. Perret
mise en forme : P. Perret Page 1 1/ 1
Page /1
O Objective I Issue
(what is the target?) (what needs to be considered?)
D E F G H I
PRIORITY
BENCHMARKS TAKEN INTO
EXPECTED PERFORMANCE ASSESMENT METHODOLOGY
1 2 3 CONSIDERATION
1.1.4. Strategies for selecting: site, materials, multi-criteria decision analysis, etc.
1.2.1. The response to a local request
1.2.2. Information, consultation and coordination
1.2 - STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
1.2.3. Specific organisational aspects of the construction phase
1.2.4. Staff and user awareness
1.3.1. Implementing monitoring
1.3 - TRANSPARENCY 1.3.2. Implementing certification
1.3.3. Dedicated communications
2.1.1. Hygiene and air quality
2.1.2. Other health risks (electromagnetic, laser light, etc.)
2.1 - HEALTH / SAFETY
2.1.3. Safety: access and exits, operation, etc. by neighbours, users and others
2.1.4. Ensuring security during maintenance
2.2.1. Professional insertion and return to work
2.2.2. Job creation
2.2.3. Fighting exclusion; personal mobility
2 - SOCIAL / SOCIETY
1.1.4. Strategies for selecting: site, materials, multi-criteria decision analysis, etc.
1.2.1. The response to a local request
1.2.2. Information, consultation and coordination
1.2 - STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
1.2.3. Specific organisational aspects of the construction phase
1.2.4. Staff and user awareness
1.3.1. Implementing monitoring
1.3 - TRANSPARENCY 1.3.2. Implementing certification
1.3.3. Dedicated communications
2.1.1. Hygiene and air quality
2.1 - HEALTH / SAFETY 2.1.2. Other health risks (electromagnetic, laser light, etc.)
2.1.3. Safety: access and exits, operation, etc. by neighbours, users and others
2.1.4. Ensuring safety and security during maintenance
2.2.1. Professional insertion and return to work
2.2.2. Job creation
2.2.3. Fighting exclusion; personal mobility
2 - SOCIAL / SOCIETY
1.1.4. Strategies for selecting: site, materials, multi-criteria decision analysis, etc.
1.2.1. The response to a local request
1.2.2. Information, consultation and coordination
1.2 - STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
1.2.3. Specific organisational aspects of the construction phase
1.2.4. Staff and user awareness
1.3.1. Implementing monitoring
1.3 - TRANSPARENCY 1.3.2. Implementing certification
1.3.3. Dedicated communications
2.1.1. Hygiene and air quality
2.1 - HEALTH / SAFETY 2.1.2. Other health risks (electromagnetic, laser light, etc.)
2.1.3. Safety: access and exits, operation, etc. by neighbours, users and others
2.1.4. Ensuring safety and security during maintenance
2.2.1. Professional insertion and return to work
2.2.2. Job creation
2.2.3. Fighting exclusion; personal mobility
2 - SOCIAL / SOCIETY
1 - GOVERNANCE
1 - GOVERNANCE
3.2 - CLIMATE CHANGE 3.2.2. Controlling emissions from induced trafficemissions from induced traffic
3.2.2. Controlling
3.2 - CLIMATE CHANGE
3.2.3. Reducing the dependence on fossil fuel the
3.2.3. Reducing derived
dependence energy
on fossil fuel derived energy
3.2.4. Adapting to climate change 3.2.4. Adapting to climate change
3.3.1. Controlling energy production, consumption
3.3.1. Controlling energyand distribution
production, consumption and distribution
3.3.2. Renewable energy use 3.3.2. Renewable energy use
3.3 - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 3.3 - RESOURCE
3.3.3. Controlling MANAGEMENT
water resources 3.3.3. Controlling water resources
3.3.4. Controlling raw materials’ consumption3.3.4. Controlling raw materials’ consumption
3.3.5. Consideration of materials life-cycle 3.3.5. Consideration of materials life-cycle
3.4.1. Limiting air pollution 3.4.1. Limiting air pollution
3.4.2. Waste management 3.4.2. Waste management
3.4 - CONTROLLING EMISSIONS 3.4 - CONTROLLING EMISSIONS
3.4.3. Protection of water tables, watercourses
3.4.3. Protection ofand water soils
tables, watercourses and soils
3.4.4. Limiting hydraulic and hydrogeological3.4.4. Limitingimpacts
hydraulic and hydrogeological impacts
4.1.1. Of the project or programme in4.1.1. theOfshort
the projecttermor programme in the short term
4.1 - ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION 4.1.2. Envisaged future of the project 4.1.2. or programme;
Envisaged future of thecapability to evolve
project or programme; capability to evolve
4.1 - ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION
4.1.3. Serviceability 4.1.3. Serviceability
4.1.4. Investment efficiency 4.1.4. Investment efficiency
4.2.1. Direct economic impacts 4.2.1. Direct economic impacts
4 - ECONOMIC
4 - ECONOMIC
4.2.2. Induced and indirect economic 4.2.2. impactsInduced and indirect economic impacts
4.2.3. Regional development 4.2.3. Regional development
4.2 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4.2.4. Job4.2creation
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4.2.4. Job creation
4.2.5. Economic partnerships 4.2.5. Economic partnerships
4.2.6. Synergies with other developments 4.2.6. Synergies with other developments
4.2.7. Poverty alleviation 4.2.7. Poverty alleviation
4.3.1. Simple evaluation (investment & operation
4.3.1. Simple evaluation & (investment
maintenance) & operation & maintenance)
4.3 - LIFE-CYCLE COSTING 4.3 - LIFE-CYCLE
4.3.2. Whole life-cycleCOSTING
costing (including external
4.3.2. Whole life-cyclecosts, dismantling
costing (including external costs,and costs
dismantling and avoided)
costs avoided)
4.3.3. Risk limitation costs 4.3.3. Risk limitation costs
1 - GOVERNANCE
1.1.4. Strategies for selecting: site, materials, multi-criteria
1.1.4. Strategies for selecting : decision analysis,
site, materials, multi-criteria etc.
decision analysis, etc.
1.2.1. The response to a local request 1.2.1. The response to a local request
1.2 - STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT 1.2.2. Information, consultation
1.2 - STAKEHOLDER and coordination
INVOLVEMENT 1.2.2. Information, consultation and coordination
1.2.3. Specific organisational aspects of the 1.2.3.construction
Specific organisationalphaseaspects of the construction phase
1.2.4. Staff and user awareness 1.2.4. Staff and user awareness
1.3.1. Implementing monitoring 1.3.1. Implementing monitoring
1.3 - TRANSPARENCY 1.3 - TRANSPARENCY
1.3.2. Implementing certification 1.3.2. Implementing certification
1.3.3. Dedicated communications 1.3.3. Dedicated communications
2.1.1. Hygiene and air quality 2.1.1. Hygiene and air quality
2.1.2. Other health risks (electromagnetic, 2.1.2. laser Otherlight, etc.)
health risks (electromagnetic, laser light, etc.)
2.1 - HEALTH / SAFETY 2.1.3. Safety: 2.1 - HEALTH and
access / SAFETY
exits, operation, 2.1.3.
etc.Safety:
by neighbours,
access and exits, operation,users etc. byand others
neighbours, users and others
2.1.4. Ensuring safety and security during2.1.4. maintenance
Ensuring safety and s ecurity during maintenance
2.2.1. Professional insertion and return to work 2.2.1. Professional insertion and return to work
2.2.2. Job creation 2.2.2. Job creation
2 - SOCIAL / SOCIETY
2 - SOCIAL / SOCIETY
3 - ENVIRONMENT
4 - ECONOMIC
4.2.2. Induced and indirect economic impacts 4.2.2. Induced and indirect economic impacts
4.2.3. Regional development 4.2.3. Regional development
4.2 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4.2 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
4.2.4. Job creation 4.2.4. Job creation
4.2.5. Economic partnerships 4.2.5. Economic partnerships
4.2.6. Synergies with other developments 4.2.6. Synergies with other developments
4.2.7. Poverty alleviation 4.2.7. Poverty alleviation
4.3.1. Simple evaluation (investment & operation 4.3.1. Simple&evaluation (investment & operation & maintenance)
maintenance)
4.3 - LIFE-CYCLE COSTING 4.3.2. Whole 4.3 - LIFE-CYCLEcosting
life-cycle COSTING (including external
4.3.2. Whole life-cycle
costs,costing (including externaland
dismantling costs,costs
dismantlingavoided)
and costs avoided)
4.3.3. Risk limitation costs 4.3.3. Risk limitation costs
This document is printed with vegetable inks on a 100% recycled and FSC certified paper. © Fidic 2013