0% found this document useful (0 votes)
71 views5 pages

Tut 4

1) The document considers properties of Riemann integrals and integrals of non-negative functions. 2) It shows that if a function f is Riemann integrable over an interval [a,b] and f(x) is always greater than or equal to 0, then the integral of f from a to b must equal 0 only when f(x) is equal to 0 for all x. 3) It also provides an example of a function f defined on [0,2] that is Riemann integrable with its Riemann sum converging to the integral of x^2 from 0 to 2.

Uploaded by

Aaryan Sanapala
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
71 views5 pages

Tut 4

1) The document considers properties of Riemann integrals and integrals of non-negative functions. 2) It shows that if a function f is Riemann integrable over an interval [a,b] and f(x) is always greater than or equal to 0, then the integral of f from a to b must equal 0 only when f(x) is equal to 0 for all x. 3) It also provides an example of a function f defined on [0,2] that is Riemann integrable with its Riemann sum converging to the integral of x^2 from 0 to 2.

Uploaded by

Aaryan Sanapala
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Tutorial 4

a -3x2+ 32-1 =

(n- 173
La
of the form p(x
-

1)
hence the TS at x
=

f(n) =

Ean an

b(n) = c)
n =
0

= N

0 ↳
n =

ann
R
I

n =
0

I
f(x)
Consides In =

90 , n , ...... ]

L(t , Pn) =

* mi( - )
i 0
=

=mi(n)
i =
8

(l(i) +

i
=

H
(2)(t)

=(n+1) (i) +

(n -1)(2)(i)

3
I
= -

v(f , Pn) =

3 +

I
Now , L(+ , Pn) = L(f) = v(f) = V (f, Pn)

At 1tn -
,
L(f , 4n) =

U(t , Pn)

Hence L(t) v(f) b


I)f(n)dn
=
=
=

,
(a) As I is Riemann int ,

(If , P)
d f(n)dn V(f , P)
= =

NOW , L(f , P) =

< m
: (Wi+-xi)
As f(n) > 0
, Mi > 0 + i .

Hence ((+ , P) = 0 => Yf(u)dn - 0

Assume I (t(a , b) s t .
f(z) > 0 ·

Now ,
58 S t .
f(x)
>
F In-11 < S
(No need to write proof .
Obvious with t =

Ex)
Hence ,
for any partition 4,

v(f , 4) =
(28) +
1
=

8 f(c) .

Hence ,

V(f) =

Inf[U(t , P)3 >


, 5 f(c)
.
But if I was Riemann integrable ,
b

aff(x)dx =

0 =

v(f) >, f f()

which is a contradiction

Hence f(x) = 0 F x .

(6) + : [0 2] ,
->
R

E
f(x) =
I x =

I x F
I

Si -
( -
)
By comparision ,
it is Riemanu Sum

of f(x) =

TIx2 over x ->

[0 17 ,
Hence
,
line
=

!) f (n) de

)! azdn I
=

You might also like