Tire Sizing Charts
Tire Sizing Charts
This page covers sizes in common use as of its writing, and a number of older
sizes. Sutherland's Handbook for Bicycle Mechanics, 3rd through 6th edition,
covers dozens of additional, antique sizes. The 6th edition is available on CD
ROM from Sutherland's. Better bike shops have a copy.
If the bicycle has rim brakes, the rim must line up with the brake shoes and so
only one rim size or a small range of sizes will work. So, first measure the
distance from where the center of the hub axle would be in a dropout to the
center of a brake shoe. Then look up the rim radius in the ISO table on this
page. A different rim size may be possible with different brakes, though
longer brake reach generally results in poorer brake performance.
The front tire must not reach the fork crown; the rear tire must not reach the
seatstay bridge or chainstay bridge. Take measurements from the axle position
to the fork crown, chainstay bridge and seatstay bridge. Tire outside radius is
nominally the rim radius plus the tire width, and as much as 1 cm greater for a
tire with a deep tread. A tire must have typically 1 cm clearance, 2 cm if a
fender will be installed, but do not use a wheel that is much smaller, or a pedal
is too likely to strike the ground in cornering. On a bicycle with horizontal
dropouts, additional clearance to the chainstay bridge is desirable so the wheel
can be removed without deflating the tire.
The space between the fork blades or stays must be wide enough to clear the
tire, with a few mm extra on each side in case the wheel goes slightly out of
true. Measure at the radius of the widest part of the tire, usually the rim radius
plus half the tire width --except that the widest part may be at the tread of an
off-road tire. Nominal tire width is marked on the tire; actual width can be
measured if the tire is installed on a rim.
If the bicycle has hub brakes (drum, disk, coaster), different rim sizes are
possible as long as the tire is fits the frame. A larger rim goes with a skinnier
tire, and vice versa..
Unfortunately, evolution of tires and rims has made these measurements lose
contact with reality. Here's how it works: Let's start with the 26 x 2.125 size
that became popular on heavyweight "balloon tire" bikes in the late '30's and
still remains common on "beach cruiser" bikes. This size tire is very close to
26 inches in actual diameter. Some riders, however, were dissatisfied with
these tires, and wanted something a bit lighter and faster. The industry
responded by making "middleweight" tires marked 26 x 1.75 to fit the same
rims. Although they are still called "26 inch", these tires are actually 25 5/8",
not 26". This same rim size was adopted by the early pioneers of west-coast
"klunkers", and became the standard for mountain bikes. Due to the appetite
of the market, you can get tires as narrow as 25 mm to fit these rims, so you
wind up with a "26 inch" tire that is more like 24 7/8" in actual diameter!
A second number or letter code would indicate the width of the tire. (26 x
1.75, 27 x 1 1/4...650B, 700C...)
If two tires are marked with sizes that are mathematically equal,
but one is expressed as a decimal and the other as a fraction,
these two tires will not be interchangeable. (well, there are three exceptions,
noted in the tables below...)
Dishonesty in Sizing
Competitive pressures have often led to inaccuracy in width measurement.
Here's how it works: Suppose you are in the market for a high-performance
700 x 25 tire; you might reasonably investigate catalogues and advertisements
to try to find the lightest 700-25 available. If the Pepsi Tire Company and the
Coke Tire Company had tires of equal quality and technology, but the Pepsi
700-25 was actually a 700-24 marked as a 25, the Pepsi tire would be lighter
than the accurately-marked Coke 700-25. This would put Pepsi at a
competitive advantage. In self defense, Coke would retaliate by marketing an
even lighter 700-23 labeled as a 700-25.
This scenario prevailed throughout the '70's and '80's. The situation got so out-
of-hand that cooler heads have prevailed, and there is a strong (but not
universal) trend toward accurate width measurements.
Some road bicycles have extremely tight clearances and will not fit an honest
28mm tire. See comments in our article on fenders.
B.S.D.
For example, a 700 x 20 C road tire would be a 20-622; a 700 x 38 hybrid tire
would be a 38-622. The width difference between these sizes would make
them less-than ideal replacements for one another, but any rim that could
fit one of them would work after a fashion with the other.
A general guideline is that the tire width should be between 1.45/2.0 x the
inner rim width.
If you pull the beads apart and measure the total width from bead to bead, it
should be approximately 2.5 x the ISO width.
If your tire is too narrow for the rim, there's an increased risk of tire/rim
damage from road hazards.
If its too wide for the rim, there's an increase risk of sidewall wear from brake
shoes, and a greater risk of loss of control in the event of a sudden flat.
The tables below give a partial listing of traditional tire sizes, with their ISO
bead-seat equivalents. The ISO comparison list at the bottom of this page
covers all sizes which we know to be in production as of 2016. The fractional,
decimal and French lists cover common sizes.
Fractional sizes
Fractional ISO Applications
29 inch 622 mm This is a marketing term for wide 622 mm ("700C") tires.
27 x
anything except "27
630 mm Older road bikes.
five" and 609 mm
Danish
26 x 1 (650 C) 571 mm Triathlon, time trial, small road bikes. Old Schwinn S-4
597 mm
26 x 1 3/8
Schwinn "lightweights"
(S-6)
26 x 1 3/4
Schwinn "middleweight" cruisers
(S-7)
571 mm
High performance wheels for smaller riders, common on Cannondale
26 x 1, 1 1/8
bicycles
520 mm or
24 x 1 1/8 Caveat emptor. 540mm is common on wheelchairs.
540 mm!
547 mm
24 x 1 3/8
Schwinn Juvenile lightweights
(S-5)
24 x 1 3/4
520 mm Schwinn "Middleweights"
(S7)
20 x 1 1/8
Juvenile lightweights, BMX for light riders, some recumbents, some
20 x 1 1/4 451 mm
folding bicycles
20 x 1 3/8
20 x 2 438 mm Swedish
18 x 1 3/8 400 mm British juvenile
16 x 1 3/8 349 mm Older Moulton; Brompton & other folders, recumbent front, juvenile
Decimal sizes:
20 x 1.5-20 x 2.125 406 mm Most BMX, juvenile, folders, trailers, some recumbents
French sizes:
In the French system, the first number is the nominal outside diameter in mm,
followed by a letter code for the width: "A" is narrow, "D" is wide. The letter
codes no longer correspond to the tire width, since narrow tires are often made
for rim sizes that originally took wide tires; for example, 700 C was originally
a wide size, but now is available in very narrow widths, with actual outside
diameters as small as 660 mm.
French Size ISO Applications
Width Considerations
Although you can use practically any tire/rim combination that shares the
same bead-seat diameter, as already noted, it is unwise to use widely disparate
sizes.
If you use a very narrow tire on a wide rim, you risk pinch flats and rim
damage from road hazards.
If you use a very wide tire on a narrow rim, you risk sidewall or rim failure.
This combination causes very sloppy handling at low speeds. Unfortunately,
current mountain-bike fashion pushes the edge of this. In the interest of
weight saving, most current mountain bikes have excessively narrow rims.
Such narrow rims work very poorly with wide tires, unless the tires are
overinflated...but that defeats the purpose of wide tires, and puts undue stress
on the rim sidewalls.
The "fatbike" phenomenon has led to the availability of very wide tires and
rims. These should only be used together.
Tire width
Rim
width 18 20 23 25 28 32 35 37 40 44 47 50 54 57
(interior)
13 X X X X
15 X X X X
17 X X X X X
19 X X X X X X
21 X X X X X X
23 X X X X
25 X X X X X
Note: This chart may err a bit on the side of caution. Many cyclists use
slightly wider tires with no problem.
The rim is typically 0.7 times as wide as the tire, and a bit of trigonometry will
get you that the rim occupies about 90 degrees of what would be the
circumference of the circle. The tire occupies the other 270 degrees (3/4 of
the circle) and so the width when mounted on the rim is 4/(3 * pi), about 0.4,
times the width when laid out flat.
Rim and tire widths of course vary, so this result is not exact.
A suggestion to measure tire width with the tire laid out flat first appeared in
the third edition of Sutherland's Handbook for Bicycle Mechanics (1980), and
I was the author of that suggestion.
That edition also included the first published tire-size chart using the ETRTO
marking standard, other than in the original ETRTO technical document. I
performed the calculations for the chart on a Hewlett-Packard Model 27
pocket calculator.
--John Allen
The GMS uses a two-number system: the first number is the width of the
casing, and the second number is the width of the tread, both in millimeters.
These measurements are taken on a rim which is 20 mm wide at the bead-
capturing point, with a tire inflated to 60psi and maintained for 24 hours.
In addition to being able accurately to size a tire, knowing the actual casing
size and tread width provides an indication of air volume, tread characteristics
and tread contact area; all of which provide you with a more concise idea of
what ride characteristics to expect from each of WTB's tires.
Tubulars existed in several different sizes, but only 700c and 26-inch tubulars
are readily available these days. Beware: sizes of 26" and 24" tubulars are
not well-standardized. Take the rim with you when buying a tire, and
vice versa. Size variations of tubulars are covered in Sutherland's Handbook
for Bicycle Mechanics, 7th Edition, available from Sutherland's, and on the
mechanic's bookshelf at better bike shops.
If you want to sound like an ignorant yahoo, call them "tubies" or "tubeless
tires." Tubeless tires for bicycles have bead wires, and are special only in
being designed to hold air without an inner tube.