UNIT 4. Operations Management
UNIT 4. Operations Management
UNIT 4. Operations Management
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
● Fixed costs – these remain fixed no matter what the level of output, such as rent of
premises.
● Variable costs – these vary as output changes, such as the direct cost of materials
used in making a washing machine or the electricity used to cook a fast-food meal.
● Semi-variable costs – these include both a fixed and a variable element, e.g. the
electricity standing charge plus cost per unit used, sales person’s fixed basic wage plus a
commission that varies with sales.
● Marginal costs – these are the additional variable costs of producing one more unit of
output.
2. Break-even analysis
If a business is able to calculate the break-even quantity that must be sold to cover
all costs, it will be easier to make important production and marketing decisions. At the
break-even level of output and sales, profit is zero. This must mean that at break even:
Total costs = Total revenue
No profit or loss is made.
Break-even point of production: the level of output at which total costs equal total
revenue.
B) Formula method
A formula can be used to calculate break even:
Contribution per unit= selling price of a product less variable costs per unit
3. Production planning
All businesses hold stocks of some kind. Banks and insurance companies will hold
stocks of stationery, and retailers have stocks of goods on display and in their warehouses.
Manufacturing businesses will hold stocks in three distinct forms:
1 Raw materials and components. These will have been purchased from outside
suppliers. They will be held in stock until they are used in the production process.
2 Work in progress. At any one time the production process will be converting raw
materials and components into finished goods and these are ‘work in progress’. For some
firms, such as construction businesses, this will be the main form of stocks held. Batch
production tends to have high work-in-progress levels.
Stock-holding costs
There are three costs associated with stock holding:
1 Opportunity cost. Working capital tied up in stocks could be put to another best
alternative use. The capital might be used to pay off loans, buy new equipment or pay off
suppliers, or could be left in the bank to earn interest.
2 Storage costs. Stocks have to be held in secure warehouses. They often require
special conditions, such as refrigeration. Staff will be needed to guard and transport the
stocks which should be insured against fire or theft.
3 Risk of wastage and obsolescence. If stocks are not used or sold as rapidly as
expected, then there is an increasing danger of goods deteriorating or becoming outdated.
This will lower the value of such stocks. Goods often become damaged while held in storage
– they can then only be sold for a much lower price.
Costs of not holding enough stocks
There are risks to holding very low stock levels – and these risks may have financial
costs for the firm. These costs are often called ‘stock-out’ costs:
1 Lost sales. If a firm is unable to supply customers ‘from stock’, then sales could be
lost to firms that hold higher stock levels. This might lead to future lost orders too. In
purchasing contracts between businesses, it is common for there to be a penalty payment
clause requiring the supplier to pay compensation if delivery dates cannot be met on time.
2 Idle production resources. If stocks of raw materials and components run out, then
production will have to stop. This will leave expensive equipment idle and labour with
nothing to do. The costs of lost output and wasted resources could be considerable.
3 Special orders could be expensive. If an urgent order is given to a supplier to
deliver additional stock due to shortages, then extra costs might be incurred in
administration of the order and in special delivery charges.
4 Small order quantities. Keeping low stock levels may mean only ordering goods
and supplies in small quantities. The larger the size of each delivery, the higher will be the
average stock level held. By ordering in small quantities, the firm may lose out on an
important economy of scale such as discounts for large orders.
1 Buffer stocks. The more uncertainty there is about delivery times or production
levels, the higher the buffer stock level will have to be. Also, the greater the cost involved in
shutting production down and restarting, the greater the potential cost savings from holding
high buffer stocks.
2 Maximum stock level. This may be limited by space or by the financial costs of
holding even higher stock levels. One way to calculate this maximum level is to add the EOQ
of each component to the buffer stock level for that item.
3 Re-order quantity. This will be influenced by the economic order quantity concept
referred to above.
4 Lead time. The longer this period of time, then the higher will have to be the re-
order stock level. The less reliable suppliers are, the greater the buffer stock level might
have to be.
5 Re-order stock level. It is now very common for computers to be used to keep a
record of every sale and every delivery of stock. The re-order quantity and re-order stock
level can be programmed into the computer and it can then reorder automatically from the
supplier when stocks fall to the re-order stock level.
Definitions
Buffer stocks (stock de seguridad): the minimum stocks that should be held to
ensure that production could still take place should a delay in delivery occur or production
rates increase.
Re-order quantity: the number of units ordered each time.
Lead time (plazo de aprovisionamiento): the normal time taken between ordering
new stocks and their delivery.
(Texto adaptado de P. & Smith, A. (2011) Business and management for the IB diploma.
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press)