Sustainable Development - 2022 - Maqbool
Sustainable Development - 2022 - Maqbool
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2428
RESEARCH ARTICLE
1
Faculty of Engineering and Environment,
Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Abstract
Tyne, UK
Considering the rapid environmental changes, the transitions to sustainable practices
2
Department of Civil Engineering, College of
Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh,
in the construction industry is vital now. Though the developed construction indus-
Saudi Arabia tries have already made efforts to switching to more sustainable and environment
3
Bob Gaglardi School of Business & friendly practices, the developing countries are still lacking it. This research was orga-
Economics, Thompson Rivers University,
Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada nised to understand the role of project management practises and integrated
4
School of Economics and Management, methods in the sustainable development in the developing countries, for looking on
Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China
how such practices can help these construction sectors become sustainable. The
Correspondence moderation effect of industrial attitudes and behaviours on sustainable construction
Rashid Maqbool, Faculty of Engineering and
was also conducted to understand the intermediary impacts. A survey based on the
Environment, Northumbria University,
Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK. snowball sample of 208 construction professionals in Ghana was conducted to deter-
Email: [email protected]
mine the impact of project management practises and integrated methods on sustain-
Funding information able construction. Research model was tested by employing bivariate correlation and
King Saud University, Grant/Award Number:
RSP-2021/280
multiple hierarchical regression analysis techniques, to establish the interrelationships
among the project management practices, integrated approaches, industrial attitudes
and behaviours, and sustainable construction and to explain these constructs in terms
of their common underlying dimensions. The findings highlight that the project man-
agement practices and integrated approaches are significantly impacting on the sus-
tainable construction practices in terms of BIM, Digital Twin, LEED, and BREEAM.
Whereas the industrial attitudes and behaviours were found to be affecting the pro-
ject management practises and integrated approaches through moderating role on
sustainable construction. The study was concluded by suggesting the importance of
sustainable construction practices and shaping industrial attitudes and behaviours
towards such practices in the developing construction industries.
KEYWORDS
industrial attitudes and behaviours, integrated approaches, moderation effect, project
management practices, sustainable construction
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2022 The Authors. Sustainable Development published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2.1 | Sustainable construction Buildings are well known for consuming significant amounts of water,
wood, energy and natural resources in the economy. According to
Sustainability is frequently defined in terms of three dimensions: envi- Gachoki et al. (2022), the use of sustainable construction methodolo-
ronmental, economic, and social, collectively known as the Triple-P gies has resulted in an 8%–9% reduction in operating expenses, a
(People, Planet, Profit). All three aspects must be evaluated concur- 7.5% increase in building value, and a 6.6% improvement in return on
rently to effectively contribute to sustainable development, as they investment. Energy consumption is reduced, and systems are
are interconnected and progress in one must not jeopardise progress improved as a result of education on sustainable construction and the
in another (Larsson & Larsson, 2020). However, many researchers use of sustainable methods (Maqbool, Deng, & Ashfaq, 2020). Water
concentrate on only one dimension, which creates an imbalance in use on construction sites must also be reconsidered with waterless
sustainable development. Sustainable construction is concerned with technologies, low-flow faucets, and self-closing faucets (Reffat, 2004).
the entire building cycle, from the extraction of raw materials through
the management and recycling of the waste generated (Maqbool &
Wood, 2022; Shi et al., 2012). According to Köhler et al. (2012), the 2.1.3 | Social impact
lack of project management standards to address sustainability in
terms of competency makes it difficult to apply sustainability in pro- People who are concerned with the healthy living in their liveable build-
jects. It has also been speculated that the integration of economic, ings can be benefitted through sustainable practices. It involves respond-
environmental and social factors would affect the project manage- ing to people's requirements at any step of the construction process
ment profession. (from commissioning to demolition), offering high customer satisfaction
Some researchers examine sustainable construction from a mana- and working closely with customers, suppliers, employees, and local com-
gerial standpoint (Bossink, 2002; Du Plessis, 2007; Lam et al., 2009; munities (Hussin et al., 2013). To achieve the social sustainability require-
Maqbool & Amaechi, 2022; Rwelamila et al., 2000). According to Wu ments in architectural designs, the following elements must be met: social
and Low (2010), project management in sustainable construction interaction; social security; adaptability; hierarchy; architectural identity;
should concentrate on techniques such as stakeholder management and participatory design (Davoodi et al., 2014). In their study, Tunji-
and organisational structure. To accomplish sustainable construction, Olayeni et al. (2020) stated that social sustainability addresses people's
all stakeholders involved in the process must play a role (Shi social expectations. It includes institutions, processes, systems, and rela-
et al., 2012). tionships that ensure that present and future generations' social needs
are not jeopardised. People come from a variety of cultural and socioeco-
nomic backgrounds, and their needs must be met fairly and equitably
2.1.1 | Environmental impact while ensuring social integration and cohesion.
and performance metrics that will contribute to the host country's groups working on the project. Proper communication management
long-term growth. In the face of uncertainty, the most vital compo- also enhances cooperative and collaborative processes (Bond-Barnard
nents are practical experience and collecting feedback, that is, check- et al., 2018; Maqbool et al., 2018). According to de Oliveira and Rabe-
ing the outcomes for the analysis of judgements and evaluations chini Jr. (2019), the communication gap among customers, designers
(Hubbard, 2014). So, in order to have a better management of sustain- and subcontractors is a key obstacle to sustainable construction.
able construction projects, initial planning, accurate estimation, cor-
rect data decrease the level of uncertainty (Sadler-Smith, 2016). As a
result, Wang (2021) suggests new analytical approaches for analysing 2.2.4 | Human resource management
the environment to execute a sustainable construction project, which
will aid in moving project focus from results to decision-making based The ability to control people within an organisation is known as
on project management standards. human resource management (HRM). Human resource management
in construction is overwhelmingly concerned with ensuring that a pro-
ject has enough human resources, with the appropriate skillsets and
2.2.1 | Stakeholder management expertise, to finish it effectively. Construction project teams are
known to be made up of many skilled professionals (k-workers) from
According to Li et al. (2018), stakeholders are individuals or organisa- various backgrounds who collaborate to accomplish the required pro-
tions that may influence or are influenced in a positive or negative way ject performance goals. There is no doubt, a better human resources
throughout the project cycle. Stakeholder groups are more evident in management is the key element in achieving the success in any kind
sustainable projects (Maqbool, Deng, & Rashid, 2020; Maqbool, of sustainable construction projects (Gunasekera & Chong, 2018).
Rashid, & Ashfaq, 2022; Olander, 2007). Stakeholder management
seeks to reconcile stakeholders' economic interests with social and envi-
ronmental goals (Marcelino-Sádaba et al., 2015). According to Armenia 2.3 | Integrated approaches
et al. (2019), a project management approach that attempts to preserve
perspective inclusiveness should involve a collaborative, transparent, According to Yudelson (2008), green buildings are built on the princi-
varied and comprehensive discussion and shaping process among vari- ples of sustainable construction, which address the ecological, social
ous stakeholders. Despite the importance of stakeholder management and economic issues of a building in the context of its community.
in construction projects, there are still countless project failures because These buildings are designed and built to use less energy and
of poor stakeholder management (Mok et al., 2015). Hence, more resources than traditional buildings and to have a lower environmental
efforts are required for effective stakeholder management in order to impact. Green building is frequently mentioned in connection with
reduce such project failures. sustainable construction. Traditional project management techniques
reduce total performance by attempting to optimise each activity,
whereas integrated approaches attempt to optimise at the project
2.2.2 | Quality management level (Forbes & Ahmed, 2010).
Thus, integrated techniques vary considerably from traditional
Chen (2019) defines construction quality management as the coordi- project management methodologies. Using sustainability assessment
nation of the construction organisation's quality control during con- tools (BREEAM, LEED) and their specific weighting methods and cri-
struction and installation, as well as project completion acceptance. teria, this work examines how sustainable construction evaluation
Construction project management involves rallying the enthusiasm of tools handle this problem and how these weights impact energy effi-
all team members towards the quality of construction and collaborat- ciency decision-making tasks (Ferreira et al., 2014). Moreover, in order
ing to complete their individual tasks. According to Zeng et al. (2015), to measure sustainability level in the buildings such sustainability
quality management aims for radical innovation and reinforces control techniques are also needed (Birgisdottir & Hansen, 2011). They
and stability by demanding standardisation or formalisation, which employ a broad set of criteria, which may lead to the pursuit of more
would obstruct the unconventional change in the process manage- sustainable solutions (Cole, 1999). These three sustainability goals are
ment system from the current situation to a completely new one that typically conflicting (Birgisdottir & Hansen, 2011).
is conducive to sustainable construction development.
the specifications of a specific customer, deliver it instantly, and main- is not only intended for improved communication, yet improved com-
tain no inventories or intermediate stores (Lim, 2008). Lean construc- munication will be required owing to all the precise planning. A LEED
tion evolved from the application of lean production techniques, project will require more intensive prior preparation for all stake-
according to Cullen et al. (2005). It has ushered in a new era of holders to be successful. This extreme inspection may or may not
manufacturing design, supply and assembly. The cornerstone of a new have been the original purpose of the LEED system, but it has had
type of project management is provided by Lean theory, methodolo- that effect (Robichaud & Anantatmula, 2011).
gies and principles.
Collaboration between sustainable and lean construction may
result in improved cost savings, waste reduction, and environmental 2.3.4 | Digital twin and building information
effects (Koranda et al., 2012; Maqbool, Saiba, & Ashfaq, 2022). The modelling
combination of sustainable and lean construction will improve the
quality of life (Abd Jamil & Fathi, 2016), as there are enormously sig- The important discussions regarding the sustainability rating through
nificant positive correlations between lean and eco-sustainability BIM and IoT is presented by Tagliabue et al. (2021). Smart contracts
(Scherrer-Rathje et al., 2009). Lean's progress has resulted in the and construction management are two areas where digital twin tech-
establishment of a new paradigm, which will invariably include an nology is gaining momentum (Chang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019). The
aspect of environmental sustainability. According to Pandithawatta creation of digital twins is the outcome of iterative optimization of the
et al., 2019, the major aim of lean construction is to give outstanding information model and project physical model (Opoku et al., 2021).
value to the client while maximising revenues through cost reduction. The terminology “BIM” is typically related to a multitude of disciplines
So, the lean construction practices helping to solve the social and (ISO, 2016). According to research, BIM may aid in various aspects of
environmental problems and bring value to the social and environ- sustainable construction (Wong & Kuan, 2014). Because of its
mental sustainability (Bae & Kim, 2008). 3-dimensional capacity, BIM has eliminated the need for a traditional
approach due to the time and effort required to effectively include
architectural features into the energy simulation model (Ryu &
2.3.2 | The building research establishment Park, 2016). These initiatives inspired Santos et al. (2019), who uti-
environmental assessment method lised BIM to define a project's physical and functional attributes and
generate a digital model (i.e., a BIM model).
The BREEAM, was originated from the United Kingdom, which has
got a popularity other sustainability rating system. It stood number
1 sustainability rating systems from 2013 to 2017 in the world 2.4 | Theoretical development
(Serrano-Baena et al., 2020). With the introduction of BREEAM, the
area of measuring the sustainability of buildings has also caught Though Project management has been already used is previous stud-
up. BREEAM's key sustainable features include resources, environ- ies (Armenia et al., 2019; Bryde, 2003), however, in its conjunction
mental effects, and, finally, health (Jensen et al., 2018). According to with the developed theoretical basis to provide solutions for the sus-
Sewell and Fraser (2019), BREEAM is widely recognised as a success- tainable construction is not addressed by many studies. Crawford
ful approach to environmental evaluation. If the sustainability is well et al. (2006) argued in their study framework focusing on project man-
understood and the BREEAM is applied in the early design stages, it agement research that stakeholder management, quality management,
can be one of the important indicators of sustainable development in relationship management and human resource management are all
the construction building projects. critical for project success. The method involves many levels of study
and shows how project management practises impact project perfor-
mance. Figure 1 highlights the theoretical framework to be tested in
2.3.3 | Leadership in energy and environmental this research.
design
According to Bowers et al. (2020), LEED is a third-party building certi- 2.4.1 | Moderation effect of industrial attitudes and
fication scheme founded in 1993 by Robert K. Watson and spear- behaviours
headed by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC). LEED
is now the most widely used building certification system, with appli- According to Ajzen (1991), attitudes and behaviours are people's reac-
cations all around the world (Jeong et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2015). tions to a certain occurrence. This reflects the evaluative judgement of
The LEED grading system guides the project towards sustainability in construction stakeholders on sustainable construction (Anzagira et al.,
many ways, including design, building, operation, and maintenance. 2019). According to Chan et al. (2017), the attitudes and behaviours of
One of the benefits is that it gives long-term solutions to individual industrial practitioners have a major negative influence on the promo-
tasks. One of the LEED system's assets is its ability to provide sustain- tion of sustainable construction. There is frequently a misalignment and
able solutions for unique projects (Mehranrad & Mahini, 2018). LEED inconsistency between industrial participants' sustainability concerns
10991719, 2023, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sd.2428 by Cochrane Colombia, Wiley Online Library on [28/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
898 MAQBOOL ET AL.
F I G U R E 1 Theoretical framework
[Colour figure can be viewed at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
and their proactive behaviours and attitudes towards sustainable con- about sustainability technology (Iqbal et al., 2021). According to the
struction (Park & Tucker, 2017). Many construction employees in devel- United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP, 2010), understand-
oping countries are unaware of the concept of sustainable construction ing of sustainable construction approaches among many professionals
and, as a result, are naturally resistant to change (Shafii et al., 2006). is limited, making it difficult for such professionals to incorporate sus-
Hwang et al. (2018) stated in their research that limited knowledge of tainability initiatives into their projects. Sustainable construction
sustainable construction, the reluctance of workers to change their con- necessitates advanced sustainable practises with limited application
ventional practises, and a lack of demand from clients are key barriers (Aghimien et al., 2019). There is insufficient information about the
to sustainable construction. application and performance of these sustainable practises due to a
lack of rigorous studies on them (Ahmed & El-Sayegh, 2022).
Resistance to new approaches
The construction industry's reluctance to adopt sustainable methods High cost of adoption
and innovation is an attitudinal barrier to sustainable construction According to Gillingham and Sweeney (2012), a lack of financial
(Alam et al., 2019). This is due to a lack of professional interest in resources is a key obstacle to taking the initiative for the adoption of
adopting new sustainable practises over traditional technologies sustainable construction in construction projects. Sustainable con-
(Gupta et al., 2017). Pinkse and Dommisse (2009) postulated that in struction necessitates a significant initial investment as well as enough
developing countries, people are not always interested in embracing resources (Darko et al., 2018). Ampratwum et al. (2021) stated that
innovative sustainable practises in their construction projects because one of the challenges inhibiting the implementation of sustainable
of their cultural beliefs. Therefore, cultural resistance to sustainability practises in the construction industry has been identified as a lack of
approaches is considered a significant behavioural barrier to sustain- capital to spend on sustainable construction. The high cost of adopt-
able construction. According to Dwaikat and Ali (2016), delivering sus- ing sustainable construction practises might be a challenge for profes-
tainable construction projects necessitates organisational leadership sionals in developing countries (Gou et al., 2013). The cost-related
and management commitment. Because sustainable projects are more challenges to sustainable construction are a lack of incentives, initial
complex than traditional ones (Ahmed and El-Seyegh, 2022), manage- capital costs, and capital expenditure (Abidin & Azizi, 2021). Agyekum
ment practises must be updated to address these complications. et al. (2020) postulated that the cost of sustainable construction prac-
According to Aghimien et al. (2019), construction team members are tises is higher than that of traditional methods, which impedes the
accustomed to traditional construction practises and thus hesitant to adoption of sustainable construction approaches in Ghana's construc-
abandon their traditional construction methods, making the adoption tion sector.
of new sustainable approaches a difficult task.
process, from theoretical underpinnings through data collection and 3.4 | Population and sample frame
analysis (Collis & Hussey, 2014).
According to Walliman (2011), a population is the total number of a
specific type of person, unit or instance relevant to a researcher's sub-
3.1 | Research philosophy ject. The importance of selecting a target population cannot be over-
stated (Ritchie et al., 2013). A sample is a part of a population drawn
According to Bryman (2016), the research philosophy is based on the to represent the whole (Naoum, 2012). The term “sample” refers to a
researchers assumptions on the study. Whereas the research is based portion of a larger group (population) selected to represent the
on the positivist knowledge which is further depends on the proven remainder (Naoum, 2012). The data was collected from both the con-
realities (Bryman, 2016; Osei-Hwedie, 2010). The survey instrument struction employees and researchers on the topics related to con-
would be created using core variables from the literature, and statisti- struction project management. A snowball sampling technique was
cal tools for data analysis would be used. used to collect the data from construction employees and researchers.
The snowball sampling technique is well known for acquiring the data
form most concerned people conveniently (Israel, 1992). The data was
3.2 | Research design collected based on the respondents' overall knowledge and experi-
ence of the sustainable construction rather than asking about their
The research design is designed to determine, among other things, how experience of any of their single projects. This way we tried to avoid
to acquire further data, analyse and interpret it, and propose solutions to any kind of biased responses from the respondents.
the problem (Sekaran & Bougie, 2016). Two basic methods to describe
the data collection and analysis are the quantitative and qualitative
approaches (Pathirage et al., 2005). The choice of such approach is 3.5 | Questionnaire development
dependent on the study's objectives and the nature of the data available
for the particular research (Baiden, 2006). The goal of quantitative A total of four factors were the part of this research, which includes,
research is to create and apply mathematical models, ideas, and hypothe- two independent factors, namely Project Management Practices and
ses about natural occurrences (Sarantakos, 2005). Quantitative research Integrated Approaches, one moderating factor of Industrial Attitudes
uses questionnaires, surveys and experiments to collect data, which is and Behaviours, and one dependent factor of Sustainable Construc-
then reviewed and tabulated in numbers, allowing the data to be cate- tion. The survey questions were asked on the five-point Likert scale
gorised by statistical analysis (Hittleman & Simon, 1997). Because of the ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The net score of all
limitations, this study took a quantitative approach. It is the ideal method the factor items represented the mean of the particular factor of the
for research when the researcher already has some knowledge about research.
the population, which is the case in this study. A survey questionnaire
has been found to be a less expensive and time-consuming method of
gathering information on population changes (Ayyash et al., 2011). 3.6 | Data collection instrument
TABLE 1 Sources of questions several closely connected procedures, such as the creation of catego-
No of Source for questions adopted ries, the application of these categories to raw data via coding, tabula-
Variables items from literature tion, and finally the drawing of statistical inferences. The suitable kind
Project management 22 Demirkesen and Ozorhon, (2017) of analysis for this study was determined by the degree of measure-
practices ment used in the data collection instruments (nominal, ordinal, interval
Integrated approaches 20 Forbes and Ahmed (2010), Hwang and ratio) and the number of cases to be analysed (Walliman, 2011).
and Ng (2013) and Ferreira et al. The data was analysed by using the Statistical Package for Social
(2014)
Scientists version 20.0 (SPSS 20.0), and performed initial reliability
Industrial attitudes and 9 Chan et al. (2017), Park and and validity checks before completing the research specific tests of
behaviours Tucker (2017).
Correlations and Multiple Hierarchical Regression analysis.
Sustainable 15 Anantatmula (2011), Hussin et al.
construction (2013), Reddy (2016) and
Gachoki et al. (2022).
4.2 | Demographic results
questions were adopted from the already developed scales; however, A total of 208 (83.2%) valid responses were received out of 250 sent
some adjustments to the wording were made wherever it was out questionnaires. More details of demographics regarding respon-
required. Five variables were included in the study, namely project dents are shown in Table 2.
management practices, integrated approaches, industrial attitudes and
behaviours, organisational innovation performance (OIP), and sustain-
able construction. 4.3 | Reliability and validity
moderation effect of industrial attitudes and behaviours on the relation- Since the moderated regression (Table 4) shows significant results
ship between project management practices and integrated approaches at p = .1, the hypothesis that industrial attitudes and behaviours mod-
(IVs) and sustainable construction (DV). At step 1, following the regres- erate project management practices and integrated approaches in
sion analysis procedure, project management practices and integrated Ghana is accepted. It can be concluded that the Ghanaian construc-
approaches were entered in model 1. At step 2, project management tion industry exhibits negative attitudes or behaviours towards the
practices and integrated approaches and industrial attitudes and behav- adoption of project management practices and integrated approaches.
iours were entered in regression model 2. To test for moderation, multi- However, the moderation effect industrial attitudes and behaviours in
ple hierarchical regression analysis was performed, and results are the Ghanaian construction industry is a slow and minimal.
shown in Table 4. The variables yielded no significant moderation effect The regression equations' information was used to illustrate the rela-
of industrial attitudes and behaviours on sustainable construction in tionship between project management practises, integrated methods and
model 3 at p-value < .05. However, at a p-value of <.10 industrial atti- sustainable building at low and high levels of industrial attitude and
tudes and behaviours shows significant moderation on the relationship behaviour (IAB). Low integrated approaches and project management
between project management practices and integrated approaches on practises are associated with being 1 SD below their means. High-
sustainable construction. integrated approaches and project management practices, on the other
hand, refer to +1 SD above their means (see Figures 2, 3 and 4).
Figure 2 highlights the moderation effect of industrial attitudes
TABLE 2 Demographic results from survey
and behaviour (IAB) on the relationship between project management
Demographic Item Frequency Percentage practices and sustainable construction.
Age 16–25 45 21.6 Figure 3 highlights the moderation effect of industrial attitudes
26–35 78 37.5 and behaviour (IAB) on the relationship between integrated
36–45 50 24.0 approaches and sustainable construction.
46–55 29 13.9
55+ 6 2.9
Occupation Architect 21 10.1 TABLE 4 Regression analysis results
5 | DI SCU SSIONS
It was observed that the Integrated Approaches are showing the posi-
F I G U R E 3 The moderation effect in between integrated tive and significant direct effect towards sustainable construction with
approaches and sustainable construction. [Colour figure can be the values of 0.06 and 0.44. Integrated Approaches, however, have a
viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
significant influence on sustainable construction. This supports Tafaz-
zoli et al.'s (2020) hypothesis that integrated approaches significantly
contribute to sustainable construction bottom-lines. According to
Cole (1999), integrated approaches investigates the sustainability of
construction projects in other to arrive at more sustainable solutions.
Thus, it can be drawn from the findings that the usage of such inte-
grated approaches and technologies is vital for the Ghanaian con-
struction industry in order to bring the sustainable aspect of the
construction industry.
attitudes and behaviours as a key barrier to improving construction can enable practitioners to learn project management practises and
sustainability in the conventional mix of project management prac- integrate approaches to enhance sustainable construction. According
tices and integrated techniques. The impacts of project manage- to Robichaud and Anantatmula (2011), project management practises
ment practices and integrated techniques paired with industrial should be integrated with technology techniques to guarantee prod-
attitudes and behaviours, was also significant as anticipated. ucts satisfy sustainable construction objectives.
Industrial attitudes and Behaviours do hinder sustainable construc-
tion. This finding implies that the influence of industrial attitudes
and behaviours on sustainable construction is considerably more 5.2.2 | Practical implication
complicated than previously predicted (Agyekum et al., 2020; Alam
et al., 2019; Iqbal et al., 2021). The influence of project management practises and integrated
Furthermore, past studies examined several aspects of sustain- approaches on sustainable construction was investigated in this study.
able construction from several viewpoints. The importance of public- The findings suggest that the Ghanaian construction sector should
private partnerships (PPP) (Cheng et al., 2020), sustainability compe- strengthen stakeholder and quality management practises as well as
tences (Abou-Warda, 2014), and policies are among these crucial employ integrated techniques to achieve sustainable construction per-
areas (Mohammed et al., 2022). However, there is a scarcity of litera- formance. Professional courses must also be taken by construction
ture on sustainable construction and OIP. According to extant industry experts to improve their implementation of integrated tech-
research, measuring systems for project management and integrated nologies and practises.
techniques are not universal. The Project Management Practices Furthermore, the findings imply that the Ghanaian construction
(PMP) measuring framework is divided into four dimensions when sector has a favourable attitude and behaviour towards sustainable
MCI is applied to the Ghanaian construction industry: SMP, CMP, construction. Thus, bringing the training for the project management
QMP and HMP. The measuring framework for Integrated Approaches practices, the usage of the sustainable and innovative technologies,
was similarly separated into two parts: ST and INT. New and advanta- and proper understanding of the technological and managerial innova-
geous efforts in the construction sector have been thoroughly vali- tions will enhance the sustainable aspect of construction industry.
dated and they add to the literature on project management theory,
particularly the dimensions of SMP and QMP given in this study. Simi-
larly, this study establishes the measurement structure of SC from 5.3 | Limitations
four perspectives: project management practices, integrated
approaches, organisation innovation performance, and industrial atti- Only survey data from Ghanaian construction sector workers was
tudes and behaviours, considering the differences between project used in this study. As a result, it represents their perspectives and
management practices and integrated approaches. They all have experiences. The study's greatest contribution to the literature, how-
strong reliability and validity and can pass the empirical test. As a ever, is that it offers industry-specific indicators for measuring sus-
result, the proposed measuring scales can be used as a guide for tainable construction. The proposed model could be simply applied to
researchers conducting similar research. other investigations, and the results could be compared. This
approach could be used to create an altogether new model for mea-
suring sustainable construction performance. Finally, this research
5.2 | Implications was limited to stakeholder management, quality management, com-
munication management, and human resource management practises
5.2.1 | Theoretical implications in project management. However, the paradigm is shifting towards a
more holistic approach that includes risk management, procurement,
This study's research is centred on a model that was built in the con- environmental management, integration management, and manage-
text of different project management practises and techniques, which ment performance, all of which should be addressed in future studies.
are tailored together with improved sustainable construction perfor-
mance. Through a solid theoretical framework of project management
practises, integrated methods, industrial attitudes and behaviours, and 6 | C O N C LU S I O N S A N D
sustainable construction, this study contributes to theory. This study RECOMMENDATIONS
proposed and evaluated a research model to help Ghanaian profes-
sionals define, plan, create, and evaluate project management prac- The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of project
tises and integrated methods that influence sustainable building management practises and integrated approaches in bringing sustain-
across sectors. Despite the plethora of literature on project manage- able construction to the Ghanaian construction industry. This study
ment practises and project sustainable building, Ghanaian profes- concluded by looking on the factors impacting the sustainable con-
sionals still lack practical support and implications. This study's struction by testing a theoretical framework which was based on the
practical implications are aimed at engineering managers, project man- quantitative questionnaire survey data of 208 valid industrial
agers and project directors in the construction industry. The research responses collected through snowball sampling process. The
10991719, 2023, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sd.2428 by Cochrane Colombia, Wiley Online Library on [28/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
904 MAQBOOL ET AL.
correlation and hierarchical regression model testing techniques were Ahmed, K., Hatira, L. and Valva, P., 2014. How can the construction indus-
employed to test the relations and affirm the findings. It was observed try in Ghana become sustainable? Master's degree thesis, School of
Engineering Blekinge Institute of technology Karlskrona, Sweden.
that the direct impacts of project management practises such as
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:829734.
stakeholder management, quality management and integrated Ahmed, S., & El-Sayegh, S. (2022). The challenges of sustainable construc-
approaches are positive and significant towards the sustainable con- tion projects delivery–evidence from the UAE. Architectural Engineer-
struction, which depict the knowledge of such practices by the profes- ing and Design Management, 18(3), 1–14.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior
sionals working in the Ghanian construction industry. However, in
and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
order to further enhance the sustainable construction, the profes- Alam, M., Zou, P. X., Stewart, R. A., Bertone, E., Sahin, O., Buntine, C., &
sionals need to focus on their stakeholder management, quality man- Marshall, C. (2019). Government championed strategies to overcome
agement, and integrated approaches. For greater generalizability of the barriers to public building energy efficiency retrofit projects. Sus-
tainable Cities and Society, 44, 56–69.
the study findings, further research should be conducted in other
Ametepey, S. O., Gyadu-Asiedu, W., & Assah-Kissiedu, M. (2015). Sustain-
developing countries, exploring additional dimensions related to pro- able construction implementation in Ghana: Focusing on awareness
ject management practices. Some of the important recommendations and challenges. Civil and Environmental Research, 7(2), 109–119.
were also formulated to suggest for sustainable aspects of the con- Ampratwum, G., Agyekum, K., Adinyira, E., & Duah, D. (2021). A frame-
work for the implementation of green certification of buildings in
struction industry as following;
Ghana. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(12),
The industry is expected to focus on these areas due to the posi-
1263–1277.
tive impact of stakeholder management and quality management of Anzagira, L. F., Duah, D., & Badu, E. (2019). A conceptual framework for
project management practises on sustainable construction. Green the uptake of the green building concept in Ghana. Scientific African, 6,
construction, Building Information Modelling, Lean construction and e00191.
Armenia, S., Dangelico, R. M., Nonino, F., & Pompei, A. (2019). Sustain-
sustainability performance certifications such as LEEDS and BREEAM
able project management: A conceptualization-oriented review
may be used as integration tools in construction. and a framework proposal for future studies. Sustainability, 11(9),
Based on the negative impact of industrial attitudes and behav- 2664.
iours on sustainable construction, these areas should not be Atombo, C., Cudjoe, J., Dzantor, K., & Agbo, A. A. (2015). Integration of
sustainable construction in project management: A case study in
ignored. The industry should pay attention to creating sustainable
Ghana. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Manage-
construction awareness, training on the use of sustainable technol- ment, 4(1), 13–25.
ogies and integrating approaches and policies to encourage sustain- Atongo, L.S., 2014. Interview by authors. March 31.
able construction. Ayarkwa, J., Acheampong, A., Wiafe, F., & Boateng, B. E. (2017). Factors
affecting the implementation of sustainable construction in Ghana:
The architect's perspective. In ICIDA 2017-6th International Conference
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS on Infrastructure Development in Africa 12-14 April (pp. 377–386).
This research is funded by Researchers Supporting Project number Knust, Kumasi, Ghana. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
(RSP-2021/280), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 317277282_Factors_Affecting_the_Implementation_of_Sustainable_
Construction_in_Ghana_the_Architect's_Perspective.
Ayyash, M. M., Ahmad, K., Singh, D., Ayyash, M. M., Ahmad, K., &
ORCID Singh, D. (2011). A questionnaire approach for user trust adoption
Rashid Maqbool https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9983-5929 in Palestinian E-government initiative. American Journal of Applied
Sciences, 8(11), 1202–1208.
Bae, J. W., & Kim, Y. W. (2008). Sustainable value on construction projects
RE FE R ENC E S and lean construction. Journal of Green Building, 3(1), 156–167.
Abd Jamil, A. H., & Fathi, M. S. (2016). The integration of lean construction Baiden, B. K. (2006). Framework for the integration of the project delivery
and sustainable construction: A stakeholder perspective in analyzing team (Doctoral dissertation). Loughborough University.
sustainable lean construction strategies in Malaysia. Procedia Computer Birgisdottir, H. and Hansen, K., 2011, Test of BREEAM, DGNB, HQE and
Science, 100, 634–643. LEED on two Danish office buildings. In SB11 Helsinki: World Sustain-
Abidin, N. Z., & Azizi, N. Z. M. (2021). Soft cost elements: Exploring man- able Building Conference, Proceedings (pp. 879–887). RIL-Finnish
agement components of project costs in green building projects. Envi- Association of Civil Engineers.
ronmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106545. Bond-Barnard, T. J., Fletcher, L., & Steyn, H. (2018). Linking trust and col-
Abou-Warda, S. H. (2014). Mediation effect of sustainability competencies laboration in project teams to project management success. Interna-
on the relation between barriers and project sustainability (the case of tional Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), 432–457.
Egyptian higher education enhancement projects). Sustainability Bossink, B. A. (2002). A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in
Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 68–94. sustainable construction. Construction Management & Economics, 20(7),
Ackah, C., Adjasi, C. and Turkson, F., 2014. Scoping study on the evolution 633–642.
of industry in Ghana (No. 2014/075). WIDER Working Paper. Bowers, B., Boyd, N., & McGoun, E. (2020). Greenbacks, green banks
Aghimien, D. O., Aigbavboa, C. O., & Thwala, W. D. (2019). Microscoping and greenwashing via LEED: Assessing banks' performance in sus-
the challenges of sustainable construction in developing countries. tainable construction. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 13(5),
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 17(6), 1110–1128. 208–217.
Agyekum, K., Opoku, A., Oppon, A. J., & Opoku, D. G. J. (2020). Obstacles Bryde, D. J. (2003). Project management concepts, methods and applica-
to green building project financing: An empirical study in Ghana. Inter- tion. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
national Journal of Construction Management, 50(6), 610–627. https:// 23(7), 775–793.
doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1832182 Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
10991719, 2023, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sd.2428 by Cochrane Colombia, Wiley Online Library on [28/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MAQBOOL ET AL. 905
Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2017). Strategies for promoting International Group for Lean Construction: 18/07/2007-20/07/2007
green building technologies adoption in the construction industry—An (pp. 67-76). Michigan State University Press.
international study. Sustainability, 9(6), 969. Frank, T. (2002). The superior project manager. Marcel Dekker.
Chang, K. M., Dzeng, R. J., & Wu, Y. J. (2018). An automated IoT visualiza- Gachoki, W., Karanja, D., & Makworo, M. (2022). Influence of gover-
tion BIM platform for decision support in facilities management. nance on sustainable municipal solid waste management in Ruiru
Applied Sciences, 8(7), 1086. sub-County, Kiambu County. East African Journal of Environment
Chen, Y. (2019). Research on engineering quality management based on and Natural Resources, 5(1), 13–21.
PDCA cycle. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Ghana Statistical Service., 2017. Statistics for Development and Progress.
490(6), 062033 IOP Publishing. Annual Gross Domestic Product Available from: http://www.
Cheng, M., Liu, G., & Xu, Y. (2020). Can joint-contract functions promote statsghana.gov.gh (Accessed 17 May 2017), (2015).
PPP project sustainability performance? A moderated mediation Gillingham, K., & Sweeney, J. (2012). Barriers to implementing low-carbon
model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management., 28(9), technologies. Climate Change Economics, 3(4), 1250019.
2667–2689. Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., & Prasad, D. (2013). Market readiness and policy
Choudhry, R. M., & Iqbal, K. (2013). Identification of risk management sys- implications for green buildings: Case study from Hong Kong. Journal
tem in construction industry in Pakistan. Journal of Management in of Green Building, 8(2), 162–173.
Engineering, 29(1), 42–49. Gunasekera, V. S., & Chong, S. C. (2018). Knowledge management for con-
Cole, R. J. (1999). Building environmental assessment methods: Clarifying struction organisations: A research agenda. Kybernetes, 47(9), 1778–1800.
intentions. Building Research & Information, 27(4–5), 230–246. Gupta, P., Anand, S., & Gupta, H. (2017). Developing a roadmap to over-
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2014). Business research: A practical guide for under- come barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst
graduate and postgraduate students (5th ed.). Macmillan International method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 244–259.
Higher Education. Hair, J. F., Ortinau, D. J., & Harrison, D. E. (2010). Essentials of marketing
Crawford, L., Pollack, J., & England, D. (2006). Uncovering the trends in research (Vol. 2). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years. Interna- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Partial least squares: The
tional Journal of Project Management, 24(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/ better approach to structural equation modeling? Long Range Planning,
10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.10.005 45(5–6), 312–319.
Cresswell, K. M., Slee, A., Coleman, J., Williams, R., Bates, D. W., & Hayes, B. E. (1992). Measurement customer satisfaction: Development and
Sheikh, A. (2013). Qualitative analysis of round-table discussions on use of questionnaire. ASQC Quality Press.
the business case and procurement challenges for hospital electronic Hittleman, D. R., & Simon, A. J. (1997). Interpreting educational research: An
prescribing systems. PLoS One, 8(11), e79394. introduction for consumers of research. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Cullen, P. A., Butcher, B., Hickman, R., Keast, J., & Valadez, M. (2005). The Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Li, Z., Zhang, B., & Zhang, W. (2018). Barriers to pro-
application of lean principles to in-service support: A comparison moting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis.
between construction and the aerospace and defence sectors. Lean Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 649–660.
Construction Journal, 2(1), 87–104. Hubbard, D. W. (2014). How to measure anything: Finding the value of intan-
Darko, A., Chan, A. P., Huo, X., & Owusu-Manu, D. G. (2019). A sciento- gibles in business. John Wiley & Sons.
metric analysis and visualization of global green building research. Hussin, J. M., Rahman, I. A., & Memon, A. H. (2013). The way forward in
Building and Environment, 149, 501–511. sustainable construction: Issues and challenges. International Journal of
Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Yang, Y., Shan, M., He, B. J., & Gou, Z. (2018). Advances in Applied Sciences, 2(1), 15–24.
Influences of barriers, drivers and promotion strategies on green build- Hwang, B. G., & Ng, W. J. (2013). Project management knowledge and
ing technologies adoption in developing countries: The Ghanaian case. skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges. International
Journal of Cleaner Production, 200, 687–703. Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 272–284.
Davoodi, S., Fallah, H. and Aliabadi, M., 2014. Determination of affective Hwang, B. G., Shan, M., & Lye, J. M. (2018). Adoption of sustainable con-
critrions on social sustainability in architectural design. In Current struction for small contractors: Major barriers and best solutions. Clean
Trends in Technology and science. In Proceedings of the 8th SAS Tech Technologies and Environmental Policy, 20(10), 2223–2237.
2014 Symposium on Advances in Science & Technology-Commission- Iqbal, M., Ma, J., Ahmad, N., Ullah, Z., & Ahmed, R. I. (2021). Uptake and
IV, Mashhad, Iran (Vol. 13). adoption of sustainable energy technologies: Prioritizing strategies to
de Oliveira, G. F., & Rabechini, R., Jr. (2019). Stakeholder management overcome barriers in the construction industry by using an integrated
influence on trust in a project: A quantitative study. International Jour- AHP-TOPSIS approach. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 5(7), 2100026.
nal of Project Management, 37(1), 131–144. Irefin, I. A. (2013). Effects of project management on the performance of a
Djokoto, S. D., Dadzie, J., & Ohemeng-Ababio, E. (2014). Barriers to sus- construction firm in Nigeria. American International Journal of Contem-
tainable construction in the Ghanaian construction industry: Consul- porary Research, 3(6), 54–58.
tants perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1), 134. ISO, ISO 29481-1:2016 Building information modelling – Information
Du Plessis, C. (2007). A strategic framework for sustainable construction delivery manual – Part 1: Methodology and format. 2016. Available
in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics, from: https://www.iso.org/standard/60553.html
25(1), 67–76. Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size (fact sheet PEOD-6) (pp. 1–5).
Dwaikat, L. N., & Ali, K. N. (2016). Green buildings cost premium: A review University of Florida.
of empirical evidence. Energy and Buildings, 110, 396–403. Jensen, K.G., Birgisdottir, H., Poulsgaard, K.S., Lind, L., Christensen, C.Ø.,
Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bot- Skjelmose, O., Carruth, S.J., Jensen, K.K., Canera, I.O., Manbodh, J.
tom line of 21st century business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42. and Zimmermann, R.K., 2018. Guide to sustainable building certifi-
Ferreira, J., Pinheiro, M. D., & de Brito, J. (2014). Portuguese sustainable cations, Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut, SBi, Accessed on
construction assessment tools benchmarked with BREEAM and LEED: 16 September 2022 at https://build.dk/Pages/Guide-to-sustainable-
An energy analysis. Energy and Buildings, 69, 451–463. building-certifications.aspx
Forbes, L. H., & Ahmed, S. M. (2010). Modern construction: Lean project Jeong, J., Hong, T., Ji, C., Kim, J., Lee, M., & Jeong, K. (2016). Development
delivery and integrated practices. CRC Press. of an evaluation process for green and non-green buildings focused on
Forsberg, A. and Saukkoriipi, L., 2007. Measurement of waste and produc- energy performance of G-SEED and LEED. Building and Environment,
tivity in relation to lean thinking. In Annual Conference of the 105, 172–184.
10991719, 2023, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sd.2428 by Cochrane Colombia, Wiley Online Library on [28/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
906 MAQBOOL ET AL.
Kibert, C. J. (2007). The next generation of sustainable construction. Build- projects; an empirical perspective. Journal of Civil Engineering and Man-
ing Research & Information, 35(6), 595–601. agement, 24(3), 223–237.
Kissi, E., Sadick, M. A., & Agyemang, D. Y. (2018). Drivers militating against Maqbool, R., Saiba, M. R., and Ashfaq, S., 2022. African waste-to-energy:
the pricing of sustainable construction materials: The Ghanaian quan- Circular economy, Favourable investment environment, technical fac-
tity surveyors perspective. Case studies in construction materials, 8, tors and community engagement. In International conference on CApac-
507–516. ity building in the Renewable Energy Sector (I-CARES)2022 IEEE.
Köhler, A., van den Brink, J., & Silvius, G. (2012). The impact of sustainability Maqbool, R., & Wood, H. (2022). Containing a sustainable urbanized envi-
on project management (pp. 183–200). The project as a social system: ronment through SuDS devices in management trains. Science of the
Asia-Pacific perspectives on project management. Total Environment, 807, 150812.
Koranda, C., Chong, W. K., Kim, C., Chou, J. S., & Kim, C. (2012). An inves- Marcelino-Sádaba, S., González-Jaen, L. F., & Pérez-Ezcurdia, A. (2015).
tigation of the applicability of sustainability and lean concepts to small Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a compre-
construction projects. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(5), hensive review to a framework definition. Journal of Cleaner Produc-
699–707. tion, 99, 1–16.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Medineckiene, M., Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). Sustainable con-
Age International. struction taking into account the building impact on the environment.
Lam, P. T., Chan, E. H., Chau, C. K., Poon, C. S., & Chun, K. P. (2009). Inte- Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 18(2),
grating green specifications in construction and overcoming barriers in 118–127.
their use. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Mehranrad, M. and Mahini, M.M., 2018. Comparison of LEED, BREEAM,
Practice, 135(4), 142–152. and the 19th issue of National Building Regulations of Iran (NBRI),
Larsson, J., & Larsson, L. (2020). Integration, application and importance of from the aspect of the sustainable design parameters. In The 4th Inter-
collaboration in sustainable project management. Sustainability, national Conference on Engineering & Information Technology,
12(2), 585. 19 December 2018, Paris, France.
Li, H., Zhang, X., Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, M. (2018). Quantifying stakeholder Mohammed, M., Shafiq, N., Al-Mekhlafi, A. B. A., Rashed, E. F.,
influence in decision/evaluations relating to sustainable construction Khalil, M. H., Zawawi, N. A., Muhammad, A., & Sadis, A. M. (2022). The
in China–a Delphi approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, mediating role of policy-related factors in the relationship between
160–170. practice of waste generation and sustainable construction waste mini-
Li, J., Kassem, M., Ciribini, A.L.C. and Bolpagni, M., 2019. A proposed misation: PLS-SEM. Sustainability, 14(2), 656.
approach integrating DLT, BIM, IOT and smart contracts: Demonstra- Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management stud-
tion using a simulated installation task. In International Conference on ies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.
Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019 (ICSIC) Driving data- International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 446–457.
informed decision-making (pp. 275–282). ICE Publishing. Naoum, S. G. (2012). Dissertation research and writing for construction stu-
Lim, V. A. J. (2008). Lean construction: Knowledge and barriers in implement- dents. Routledge.
ing into Malaysia construction industry (Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Ogunde, A., Olaolu, O., Afolabi, A. O., Owolabi, J., & Ojelabi, R. A. (2017).
Teknologi Malaysia. Challenges confronting construction project management system for
Low, S. P., Liu, J. Y., & Wu, P. (2009). Sustainable facilities: Institutional sustainable construction in developing countries: Professional's per-
compliance and the Sino-Singapore Tianjin eco-city project. Facilities, spectives (a case study of Nigeria). Journal of Building Performance,
27(9/10), 368–386. 8(1), 1–11.
Maqbool, R. (2018). Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting Olander, S. (2007). Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project
renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective. Energy, 158, management. Construction Management and Economics, 25(3),
944–956. 277–287.
Maqbool, R., & Amaechi, I. E. (2022). A systematic managerial perspective Opoku, D. G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., & Rashidi, M. (2021). Digital twin
on the environmentally sustainable construction practices of UK. Envi- application in the construction industry: A literature review. Journal of
ronmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 1–18. https://doi.org/10. Building Engineering, 40, 102726.
1007/s11356-022-20255-5 Osei-Hwedie, M. A. R. K. (2010). Strategic issues of innovative financing of
Maqbool, R., Deng, X., & Ashfaq, S. (2020). A risky output of variation infrastructure project delivery. Unpublished Thesis (MSc). Kwame Nkru-
orders in renewable energy projects: Identification, assessment and mah University of Science and Technology.
validation. Science of the Total Environment, 743, 140811. Pandithawatta, T. P. W. S. I., Zainudeen, N., & Perera, C. S. R. (2019). An
Maqbool, R., Deng, X., & Rashid, Y. (2020). Stakeholders' satisfaction as a integrated approach of lean-green construction: Sri Lankan perspec-
key determinant of critical success factors in renewable energy pro- tive. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(2), 200–214.
jects. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(1), 1–15. Park, J., & Tucker, R. (2017). Overcoming barriers to the reuse of construc-
Maqbool, R., & Jowett, E. (2022). Conserving a sustainable urban environ- tion waste material in Australia: A review of the literature. International
ment through energy security and project management practices. Envi- Journal of Construction Management, 17(3), 228–237.
ronmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–23. https://doi.org/10. Pathirage, C.P., Amaratunga, D. and Haigh, R., 2005. Knowledge manage-
1007/s11356-022-21721-w ment research within the built environment: Research methodological
Maqbool, R., Namaghi, J. R., Rashid, Y., & Altuwaim, A. (2022). How mod- perspectives. In the 5th international postgraduate conference in the
ern methods of construction would support to meet the sustainable built and human environment, 2005, the Lowry, Salford quays,
construction 2025 targets, the answer is still unclear. Ain Shams Engi- UK. (unpublished). Accessed on 16 September 2022 at http://eprints.
neering Journal, 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101943 hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/22699/
Maqbool, R., Rashid, Y., & Ashfaq, S. (2022). Renewable energy project Pinkse, J., & Dommisse, M. (2009). Overcoming barriers to sustainability:
success: Internal versus external stakeholders' satisfaction and influ- An explanation of residential builders' reluctance to adopt clean tech-
ences of power-interest matrix. Sustainable Development. https://doi. nologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(8), 515–527.
org/10.1002/sd.2327 Project Management Institute, PMI (2008). A guide to the Project Manage-
Maqbool, R., Rashid, Y., Sultana, S., & Sudong, Y. (2018). Identifying the ment body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide)—Fourth edition. Project Man-
critical success factors and their relevant aspects for renewable energy agement Institute, Inc.
10991719, 2023, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sd.2428 by Cochrane Colombia, Wiley Online Library on [28/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MAQBOOL ET AL. 907
Project Management Institute, PMI (2013). A guide to the Project Manage- Simpeh, E.K. and Smallwood, J.J., 2015. Factors influencing the growth of
ment body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide)-fifth edition. In A guide to green building in the South African construction industry. In Smart and
the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK (R) guide. Project Sustainable Built Environment (SASBE) Conference 2015 (p. 311).
Management Institute. Strydom, A., Livingston, G., King, M., & Hassiotis, A. (2007). Prevalence of
Reddy, V. S. (2016). Sustainable construction: Analysis of its costs and dementia in intellectual disability using different diagnostic criteria.
financial benefits. International Journal of Innovative Research in The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(2), 150–157.
Engineering and Management, 3(6), 522–525. Tabassi, A. A., Roufechaei, K. M., Ramli, M., Bakar, A. H. A., Ismail, R., &
Reffat, R., 2004. Sustainable construction in developing countries. In Pakir, A. H. K. (2016). Leadership competences of sustainable construc-
Proceedings of First Architectural International Conference, Cairo tion project managers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 339–349.
University, Egypt (pp. 1–8). Tafazzoli, M., Mousavi, E., & Kermanshachi, S. (2020). Opportunities and
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M. N., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Quali- challenges of green-lean: An integrated system for sustainable con-
tative research practice: A guide for social science students and struction. Sustainability, 12(11), 4460.
researchers. Sage. Tagliabue, L. C., Cecconi, F. R., Maltese, S., Rinaldi, S., Ciribini, A. L. C., &
Robichaud, L. B., & Anantatmula, V. S. (2011). Greening project manage- Flammini, A. (2021). Leveraging digital twin for sustainability assess-
ment practices for sustainable construction. Journal of Management in ment of an educational building. Sustainability, 13(2), 480.
Engineering, 27(1), 48–57. Tunji-Olayeni, P., Kajimo-Shakantu, K., & Osunrayi, E. (2020). Practitioners'
Rwelamila, P. D., Talukhaba, A. A., & Ngowi, A. B. (2000). Project procure- experiences with the drivers and practices for implementing sustain-
ment systems in the attainment of sustainable construction. Sustain- able construction in Nigeria: A qualitative assessment. Smart and
able Development, 8(1), 39–50. Sustainable Built Environment, 9(4), 443–465.
Ryu, H. S., & Park, K. S. (2016). A study on the LEED energy simulation United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP., 2010. Green buildings
process using BIM. Sustainability, 8(2), 138. and the finance sector: An overview of financial institution involve-
Sadler-Smith, E. (2016). ‘What happens when you intuit?’: Understanding ment in green buildings in North America. A report commissioned by
human resource practitioners' subjective experience of intuition the north American the north American task force, UNEP finance ini-
through a novel linguistic method. Human Relations, 69(5), 1069– tiative, 1–42.
1093. Walliman, N. (2011). Research methods: The basics (1st ed.). Routledge.
Santos, R., Costa, A. A., Silvestre, J. D., & Pyl, L. (2019). Informetric analysis Wang, S., Tang, W., & Li, Y. (2013). Relationship between owners' capabili-
and review of literature on the role of BIM in sustainable construction. ties and project performance on development of hydropower projects
Automation in Construction, 103, 221–234. in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(9),
Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social research (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. 1168–1178.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for busi- Wang, W. (2021). The concept of sustainable construction project
ness students. Pearson education. management in international practice. Environment, Development and
Scherrer-Rathje, M., Boyle, T. A., & Deflorin, P. (2009). Lean, take two! Sustainability, 23(11), 16358–16380.
Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation. Business World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), (1987).
Horizons, 52(1), 79–88. World commission on environment and development. Our common
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill build- future, 17(1), 1-91.
ing approach. John Wiley & Sons. Wong, J. K. W., & Kuan, K. L. (2014). Implementing ‘BEAM plus’ for BIM-
Seow, T. W., & Mohamad, A. H. (2007). Construction waste management on based sustainability analysis. Automation in Construction, 44, 163–175.
site. Proceedings of Universiti Perguruan Sultan Idris. Wu, P., & Low, S. P. (2010). Project management and green buildings:
Serrano-Baena, M. M., Triviño-Tarradas, P., Ruiz-Díaz, C., & Hidalgo Lessons from the rating systems. Journal of Professional Issues in
Fernández, R. E. (2020). Implications of BREEAM sustainability assess- Engineering Education and Practice, 136(2), 64–70.
ment on the design of hotels. Sustainability, 12(16), 6550. Yudelson, J. (2008). The green building revolution. Island Pr.
Sewell, J., & Fraser, D. (2019). A study of the effectiveness of BREEAM as an Zeng, J., Phan, C. A., & Matsui, Y. (2015). The impact of hard and soft qual-
assessment tool for sustainability by interview of practitioners. The Shef- ity management on quality and innovation performance: An empirical
field Hallam University Built Environment Research Transactions. study. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 216–226.
Accessed on 16 September 2022, at. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/ Zhao, J., Lam, K. P., Biswas, T., & Wang, H. (2015). An online platform to
24550 automate LEED energy performance evaluation and submission
Shafii, F., Arman Ali, Z. and Othman, M.Z., 2006. Achieving sustainable process. Construction Innovation, 15(3), 313–332.
construction in the developing countries of Southeast Asia. In Pro-
ceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construc-
tion Conference (APSEC 2006), 5–6 September 2006, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. How to cite this article: Maqbool, R., Saiba, M. R., Altuwaim,
Shi, Q., Zuo, J., & Zillante, G. (2012). Exploring the management of sustain-
A., Rashid, Y., & Ashfaq, S. (2023). The influence of industrial
able construction at the programme level: A Chinese case study. Con-
struction Management and Economics, 30(6), 425–440. attitudes and behaviours in adopting sustainable construction
Silvius, A. G., Kampinga, M., Paniagua, S., & Mooi, H. (2017). Considering practices. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 893–907. https://
sustainability in project management decision making; an investigation doi.org/10.1002/sd.2428
using Q-methodology. International Journal of Project Management,
35(6), 1133–1150.