Chapter 6
Chapter 6
CHAPTER 6
When you speak of having information, it implies that you know something
about a particular object or topic. In statistics and psychometrics, the term
information conveys a similar, but somewhat more technical, meaning. The
statistical meaning of information is credited to Sir R.A. Fisher, who defined
information as the reciprocal of the precision with which a parameter could be
estimated. Thus, if you could estimate a parameter with precision, you would
know more about the value of the parameter than if you had estimated it with
less precision. Statistically, the precision with which a parameter is estimated is
measured by the variability of the estimates around the value of the parameter.
Hence, a measure of precision is the variance of the estimators, which is
denoted by σ2. The amount of information, denoted by I, is given by the
formula:
1
I= [6-1]
σ2
In item response theory, our interest is in estimating the value of the ability
parameter for an examinee. The ability parameter is denoted by θ, and θ^ is an
estimator of θ. In the previous chapter, the standard deviation of the ability
estimates about the examinee’s ability parameter was computed. If this term is
squared, it becomes a variance and is a measure of the precision with which a
given ability level can be estimated. From equation 6-1, the amount of
information at a given ability level is the reciprocal of this variance. If the
amount of information is large, it means that an examinee whose true ability is
at that level can be estimated with precision; i.e., all the estimates will be
reasonably close to the true value. If the amount of information is small, it
means that the ability cannot be estimated with precision and the estimates will
be widely scattered about the true ability. Using the appropriate formula, the
amount of information can be computed for each ability level on the ability
scale from negative infinity to positive infinity. Because ability is a continuous
variable, information will also be a continuous variable. If the amount of
information is plotted against ability, the result is a graph of the information
function such as that shown below.
Chapter 6: The Information Function 105
information, based upon a single item, can be computed at any ability level and
is denoted by Ii (θ ), where i indexes the item. Because only a single item is
involved, the amount of information at any point on the ability scale is going
to be rather small. If the amount of item information is plotted against ability,
the result is a graph of the item information function such as that shown
below.
The general level of the test information function will be much higher than
that for a single item information function. Thus, a test measures ability more
precisely than does a single item. An important feature of the definition of test
information given in equation 6-2 is that the more items in the test, the greater
the amount of information. Thus, in general, longer tests will measure an
examinee’s ability with greater precision than will shorter tests. Plotting the
amount of test information against ability yields a graph of the test
information function such as that shown below for a ten-item test.
to measure ability with considerable precision at ability levels near the ability
used to separate those who will receive the scholarship from those who do
not. The best test information function in this case would have a peak at the
cutoff score. Other specialized uses of tests could require other forms of the
test information function.
While an information function can be obtained for each item in a test, this is
rarely done. The amount of information yielded by each item is rather small,
and we typically do not attempt to estimate an examinee’s ability with a single
item. Consequently, the amount of test information at an ability level and the
test information function are of primary interest. Since the test information is
obtained by summing the item informations at a given ability level, the amount
of information is defined at the item level. The mathematical definition of the
amount of item information depends upon the particular item characteristic
curve model employed. Therefore, it is necessary to examine these definitions
under each model.
Chapter 6: The Information Function 109
Ii (θ ) = ai2 Pi (θ ) Qi (θ ) [6-3]
Qi (θ ) =1 - Pi (θ ),
To illustrate the use of equation 6-3, the amount of item information will be
computed at seven ability levels for an item having parameter values of b = 1.0
and a = 1.5.
Ii (θ ) = Pi(θ ) Qi (θ ) [6-4]
This is exactly the same as that under a two-parameter model when the value
of the discrimination parameter is set to 1. To illustrate the use of equation 6-
4, the amount of item information will be calculated for an item having a
difficulty parameter of 1.0.
previous item. Again, the item information function is symmetric about the
value of the difficulty parameter.
Qi (θ ) Pi (θ ) − c 2
I i (θ ) = a
2
[6-5]
Pi (θ ) (1 − c )
2
To illustrate the use of these formulas, the computations will be shown for an
item having parameter values of b = 1.0, a = 1.5, c = .2. The values of b and a
are the same as those for the preceding two-parameter example. The
computations will be performed in detail at an ability level of θ = 0.0.
L = 1.5 (0 - 1) = -1.5
Qi (θ ) = 1 - .346 = .654
a2 = (1.5)2 = 2.25
Then:
Clearly, this is more complicated than the computations for the previous two
models, which are, in fact, logistic models. The amount of item information
computations for this item at seven ability levels is shown below.
The shape of this information function is very similar to that for the preceding
two-parameter example in which b = 1.0 and a = 1.5. However, the general
level of the values for the amount of information is lower. For example, at an
ability level of θ = 0, the item information was .142 under a three-parameter
model and .34 under a two-parameter model having the same values of b and
a. In addition, the maximum of the information function did not occur at an
ability level corresponding to the value of the difficulty parameter. The
maximum occurred at an ability level slightly higher than the value of b.
Because of the presence of the terms (1 - c) and (Pi (θ ) - c) in equation 6-5, the
amount of information under a three-parameter model will be less than under
a two-parameter model having the same values of b and a. When they share
common values of a and b, the information functions will be the same when c
Chapter 6: The Information Function 113
= 0. When c > 0, the three-parameter model will always yield less information.
Thus, the item information function under a two-parameter model defines the
upper bound for the amount of information under a three-parameter model.
This is reasonable, because getting the item correct by guessing should not
enhance the precision with which an ability level is estimated.
Item b a
1 -1.0 2.0
2 -0.5 1.5
3 -0.0 1.5
4 0.5 1.5
5 1.0 2.0
The amount of item information and the test information will be computed
for the same seven ability levels used in the previous examples.
Item Information
Test
θ 1 2 3 4 5 Information
- .071 .051 .024 .012 .001 .159
- .420 .194 .102 .051 .010 .777
- 1.000 .490 .336 .194 .071 2.091
0 .420 .490 .563 .490 .420 2.383
1 .071 .194 .336 .490 1.000 2.091
2 .010 .051 .102 .194 .420 .777
3 .001 .012 .024 .051 .071 .159
114 Chapter 6: The Information Function
Each of the item information functions was symmetric about the value of the
item’s difficulty parameter. The five item discriminations had a symmetrical
distribution around a value of 1.5. The five item difficulties had a symmetrical
distribution about an ability level of zero. Because of this, the test information
function also was symmetric about an ability of zero. The graph of this test
information function is shown in Figure 6-4.
The graph of the test information function shows that the amount of
information was relatively flat over the range θ = -1 to θ = +1; outside of this
range, the amount of information decreased rather rapidly. However, in Table
6-4, the values of the test information varied over the whole ability scale. The
apparent flat section of the plotted test information function is due to the
coarseness of the information scale in the graph.
[6-6]
For example, in Figure 6-4, the maximum amount of test information was
2.383 at an ability level of 0.0. This translates into a standard error of .65,
which means roughly that 68 percent of the estimates of this ability level fall
between -.65 and +.65. Thus, this ability level is estimated with a modest
amount of precision.
b = -.4, a = 1.0
b = -.3, a = 1.5
b = -.2, a = 1.2
b = -.1, a = 1.3
b = 0, a = 1.0
b = 0, a = 1.6
b = .1, a = 1.6
b = .2, a = 1.4
b = .3, a = 1.1
b = .4, a = 1.7
Chapter 6: The Information Function 117
a. When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
Exercises
a. Using a two-parameter model
Exercise 1
(6) Click on [ENTER PARAMETERS] and then set all the item
difficulty parameters to b = 0.0 and use various values of a that are
all greater than 1.0 but less than 1.7.
(7) When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
Exercise 2
(16) Click on [ENTER PARAMETERS] and then set all the item
difficulty parameters to b = 0.0 and use various values of a that are
all less than 1.0.
(17) When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
(19) The test information function will be symmetric about zero, but will
have a much lower overall level than the previous test information
function.
Exercise 3
120 Chapter 6: The Information Function
(6) Click on [ENTER PARAMETERS] and then set all the item
difficulty parameters to b = 0.0 and use various values of a that are
all greater than 1.7. The maximum value you can use is 2.0.
(7) When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
(9) The test information function will have a maximum greater than
that of all of the previous examples, thus illustrating the dependence
of the amount of information upon the values of the discrimination
parameter.
Exercise 4
(7) When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
(9) The general level of the test information function will be much
lower than the corresponding example. Depending on how you
chose the values of b and a, the shape of the curve could be quite
similar to the previous case.
Exercise 1
(6) Click on [ENTER PARAMETERS] and then set all the item
difficulty parameters to some common value other than zero.
(7) When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
(9) The test information curve will be centered on this common value.
The general level of the amount of information will be modest
because the Rasch model fixes the discrimination parameter at 1.0.
Exercise 2
(6) Click on [ENTER PARAMETERS] and then set the item difficulty
parameters to some values that are equally spaced over the full
range of ability from -3 to +3.
(7) When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
(9) The test information function will be rather flat, and the general
amount of information will be rather low.
Exercise 1
(7) When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
(9) Take note of the shape and general level of the obtained test
information function.
Exercise 2
(6) Click on [ENTER PARAMETERS] and then use the same values
of b and a that were used in the previous problem, but set all the
values of c = .35.
(7) When you are satisfied with the parameter values, respond to the
message PARAMETER VALUES OK? by clicking on the YES
button.
(9) The resulting test information function will have a shape similar to
that of the previous problem. However, the general level of the
amount of test information will be less than that of the previous
example. This illustrates the effect of guessing upon the precision
with which ability is estimated.
d. Exploratory exercises
1. Use a model of your choice and select values of the item parameters
such that the test information function approximates a horizontal
line. Use a ten-item test.
Things To Notice
3. When the item difficulties are clustered closely around a given value, the
test information function is peaked at that point on the ability scale. The
maximum amount of information depends upon the values of the
discrimination parameters.
4. When the item difficulties are widely distributed over the ability scale, the
test information function tends to be flatter than when the difficulties are
tightly clustered.
5. Values of a < 1.0 result in a low general level of the amount of test
information.
6. Values of a > 1.7 result in a high general level of the amount of test
information.