Lead Acid Battery Recycling
Lead Acid Battery Recycling
Lead Acid Battery Recycling
health considerations
Recycling used lead-acid batteries:
health considerations
Recycling used lead-acid batteries: health considerations ISBN
978-92-4-151285-5
Further comments were provided by: Jack Caravanos, New York University, New
York, USA; Edith Clarke, Occupational & Environmental Health Unit, Ghana
Health Service, Accra, Ghana; Bret Ericson, Pure Earth, New York, USA; Perry
Gottesfeld, Occupational Knowledge International, USA; Amalia Laborde, Centro de
Información y Asesoramiento Toxicológico, Montevideo, Uruguay; Philip Landrigan,
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA; Byung-Kook Lee, Institute
of Environmental & Occupational Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Republic of
Korea; Angela Mathee, Environment and Health Research Unit, Medical Research
Council, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Lynn Panganiban, Department of
Pharmacology & Toxicology of
the College of Medicine, Manila, the Philippines.
From WHO, comments were provided by: Hamed Bakir, Mohamed Elmi, Soren
Madsen, Mazen Malkawi and Raki Zghondi, Eastern Mediterranean Regional Centre
for Environmental Health Activities, Amman, Jordan; and Dorota
Jarosińska, WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn, Germany.
Photo credits: Larry C. Price/ The Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting (recycling in
Indonesia: front cover and pages 9, 25 and 26); Perry Gottesfeld/Occupational
Knowledge International (recycling in Viet Nam pages 12 and 19).
The document outlines the process of recycling used lead-acid batteries and describes
how lead exposure can occur. Three case studies illustrate the impact that uncontrolled
battery recycling can have on a community. The document then discusses the adverse
health impacts resulting from exposure to lead. An overview is given on methods for
assessing lead exposure through measurement of blood lead concentrations and
environmental sampling. This document does not aim to provide technical details of
environmental sampling methods but refers the reader to other sources. Finally, brief
information is provided on control
measures to prevent the release of lead during recycling.
connectors cap
battery elements
The average amount of lead in automotive batteries can range from 2 to 13 kg,
depending on the size of the vehicle (CEC, 2016).
The batteries are mechanically or manually broken up to separate out the acid and
component parts. The lead components are conveyed to the furnace for smelting. After
smelting the slag is removed and the molten unrefined lead may be poured into
moulds and cooled or it may immediately be directed to a holding kettle (cast-iron pot)
to keep it molten prior to refining. The aim of the refining process is to produce lead of
high purity or to produce alloys (requiring the addition of specific trace elements to the
refining kettle) that can be used to make a new lead battery. The molten lead is then
cast into moulds and
allowed to cool (OSHA, 2002).
The electrolyte may be recovered for re-use or neutralized with alkali and treated to
remove lead and other contaminants before being released into the sewage system.
Alternatively the solution may be purified and sodium sulfate extracted
for use in making detergents and other products (UNEP, 2003; ILA, 2015).
At each of these stages, lead fumes and dust are released into the air (see section
Automated, enclosed
2.3), contaminating both the workplace and the wider environment. The use of
processes with
pollution control automated, enclosed processes with pollution control devices can
devices are necessary reduce these emissions.
to reduce In a typical automated enclosed process, the lead batteries are broken up in a
lead emissions hammermill or shredder and the pieces are fed into tanks filled with water. Here
gravity is used to separate the components: the lead and heavy materials sink to the
bottom and the plastics rise to the top. The plastic materials are skimmed away and
the liquid, including the sulfuric acid electrolyte is drawn off. The metallic components
are channelled to closed furnaces for smelting and refining and then piped into casting
moulds (OSHA, 2002; UNEP, 2003). Waste from recycling is collected, treated and
disposed of at a designated
waste disposal site (UNEP, 2003).
In a manual process the batteries are drained then broken up with electric saws,
machetes or axes. The components are separated by hand into piles. The lead
components are carried to the furnace or taken on an open conveyer belt. The furnace
may, in the worst case, be no more than an open pot on a fire (UNEP, 2003; UNEP,
2004; Manhart & Schleicher, 2015). The molten lead
is then poured into casting moulds.
Collection &
transport of Plastic / Toxic smoke including
batteries ebonite sulfur dioxide, dioxins,
components dibenzofurans.
burnt or Lead–contaminated waste
Breaking up dumped
batteries into
component
parts
Lead-containing
components Lead fragments and lead oxide
broken up dust dispersed into air and settle
on soil, other surfaces and
workers’ hair & clothes.
Surrounding environment
Conveying contaminated
broken battery with lead
parts to the
smelter
Workers go
home without Lead dust carried home and
washing and contaminates domestic
changing environment
clothes
Manually breaking up the batteries releases lead particles and lead oxide dust, which
Manual recycling
are a source of lead exposure to the worker (Suplido & Ong, 2000; UNEP, 2003).
methods release
The dust and particles also settle in the surrounding soil and may be blown to more large amounts
distant areas, contaminating the wider environment and becoming a source of exposure of lead into
to the community (UNEP, 2003; Haefliger et al., 2009). Hammermills and shredders the environment
may release lead mist, which can dry and release lead dust if disturbed. Dust settled
on vibrating equipment can
become re-suspended in air and inhaled (OSHA, 2002).
When lead components are moved around the recycling site, e.g. on open conveyor
belts or in wheelbarrows, and when they are shovelled into the furnace,
lead fragments and dust are released.
The temperatures used for refining lead can be up to 1000 °C, which generates large
amounts of lead fume. If the furnace is not under negative pressure or if the plant has
inadequate ventilation and/or emission controls, the fumes will be inhaled by workers
(UNEP, 2003). Lead fumes are particularly hazardous as the small particle size enables
the lead to be inhaled into the lower respiratory tract and absorbed (ATSDR, 2007).
The fumes will eventually settle as lead particles on surrounding surfaces and the soil,
creating lead dust, which can also be inhaled. Fugitive lead emissions from these
sources can be substantial and are more difficult to control. Sometimes ash from the
smelting process is manually sifted to retrieve metal particles, dispersing lead-
contaminated dust
into the air (Paddock, 2016)
Fume, lead particles and dust released at various stages in the recycling process
Washing oneself and
will also settle on the skin, hair and clothes of workers. If workers do not wash and
changing clothes
before returning change clothes before returning home this lead becomes a source of take-home
home protects family exposure to household members and even, potentially, to the wider community
members from lead (Daniell et al., 2015). Lead poisoning in the spouses and children of lead workers,
exposure caused by transfer of lead from the workplace to
home, has repeatedly been documented (Baker et al., 1977; Chisolm, 1978).
Soil contaminated with lead compounds can spread throughout the community and be
Informal recycling is
tracked into homes. If recycling activities take place around the home, then airborne
particularly likely to
lead can enter the home and accumulate on the floor, on beds and on other furniture cause environmental
(Haefliger et al., 2009). Settled dust can be re-suspended in the air and inhaled as contamination and
people walk through or brush up the dust. Young children, who spend large amounts human exposure
of time on the ground and who frequently put their hands and other objects in their to lead
mouths, are at particularly high risk
of lead exposure in these settings.
If the plastic components are inadequately washed before re-use for other products,
then these products will be contaminated with lead (Manhart & Schleicher 2015).
Battery casings may be used around the home as a construction material or as
containers, again introducing the possibility of lead
contamination (Daniell et al., 2015).
There have been reports in Cameroon and other countries of lead scrap from
informal recycling being mixed with scrap aluminium to make cooking pots
(CREPD, 2015). Lead can leach out into food being prepared or stored in these
pots (Weidenhamer et al., 2014;
Weidenhamer et al., 2017).
Communities living near recycling facilities are at risk of exposure to lead, and
extensive contamination of soil surrounding many formal sector recycling plants has
been reported (Levallois et al., 1991; Wang et al,. 1992; Zhang et al., 2016). In their
review, Gottesfeld & Pokhrel (2011) summarized 11 studies in seven countries on
lead exposure of children residing near lead battery manufacturing and recycling
facilities and reported an average blood lead concentration of 29 µg/dL, with values
up to 71 µg/dL. Recently a large recycling plant in the USA was closed down after it
failed to meet emission controls and waste management standards. This plant was
found to have contaminated the surrounding area with lead to a distance of 1.7 miles
(California Environmental
Protection Agency, 2015).
The case studies given below illustrate how environmental contamination caused by the
recycling of used lead-acid batteries can result in severe lead poisoning in a community,
which may continue even after recycling operations have stopped. The first case
describes exposure to lead via reclamation of lead and lead compounds from
discarded batteries, and the health consequences. The other two case studies show that
closing down or moving battery recycling operations
are not sufficient measures on their own to prevent human lead exposure.
2.5.1. Senegal
Between November 2007 and March 2008, 18 children died from an aggressive central
nervous system disease of unexplained origin in a neighbourhood of Dakar in Senegal
(Haefliger et al., 2009). One of the possibilities considered
was lead intoxication, as the mothers of some of the children were engaged
An investigative mission was sent to work with the local health authorities in
investigating the deaths. For cultural reasons it was not possible to conduct autopsies
and post-mortem testing on the children who had died and, therefore, the mission team
focused their investigation on the siblings and mothers of the children. Another group
of children and adults, who were living in the same community but apparently
unrelated to the deceased children, were also investigated to evaluate the extent of
lead intoxication in the area. In total 81 individuals were examined and tested and all
were found to be poisoned, often severely, with lead. In the children blood lead
concentrations ranging from 39.8 μg/dL to 613.9 μg/dL were found (levels above 45
μg/dL indicate
potentially serious poisoning).
Environmental investigations found that homes and soil were heavily contaminated with
lead. Lead concentrations in outdoor soil were up to 302 000 mg/kg and indoor
concentrations were as high as 14 000 mg/kg. For comparison, the US EPA standard
for soil in a children’s play area is 400 mg/kg and for other residential areas it is
1200 mg/kg (US EPA, 2001). The exposure pathway was most likely via inhalation
and/or ingestion of the contaminated soil and dust in suspension as young children
were playing on contaminated ground. This indicated that other inhabitants of the
affected area (about 940 people, of whom 460 were children and adolescents) might
also be poisoned with lead. While the causes of death of the 18 children could not be
confirmed, circumstantial evidence, including heavy environmental contamination and
the high blood lead concentrations in siblings suggest that most, if not all, of the
children died because of encephalopathy as a result of severe lead poisoning. To
prevent further exposures the homes were cleaned and contaminated soil was removed
and replaced with cleaner soil. A public awareness campaign
was also carried out to encourage a change in recycling practices.
Six months later a follow-up survey was conducted in 146 lead-poisoned children
in the same community (Kaul et al., 1999). This found that although the blood
An environmental assessment found that, although the smelter had shut down, metallic
scrap and mixed residual soil and solid materials were still scattered around. Some
clean-up activities had begun during the time of visit; however, an assortment of waste
materials remained at the site and continued to be a hazard to the neighbourhood. The
authors concluded that although closing the battery recycling facility significantly
lowered blood lead concentrations of children, the children were still exposed to lead
through their environment
(Kaul et al., 1999).
In 2008 and 2009 some remediation activities were carried out to remove
contaminated soil and educational sessions were given to local children to help
minimize their exposure to lead dust and materials (Blacksmith Institute, 2009).
Surface lead contamination was tested in 11 homes and a mean value of 95 µg/cm2
was found, considerably higher than the US EPA standard for dust on household floors
of 0.043 µg/cm2 (US EPA, 2001). Higher concentrations were found in homes with
active recycling compared with those where recycling was no longer carried out. In
these latter homes the highest concentrations were found around washing areas and
in some kitchen and living areas. This suggested take-home lead contamination,
with washing done at home rather than at the workplace. While surface contamination
with lead was lower at the school, though still high at 41 µg/cm2, four sleeping mats
were found to have lead contamination at a mean of 221 µg/cm2. This suggested that
children
had brought lead to school on their shoes and clothing.
The absorption of lead from the gastrointestinal tract is affected by dietary factors,
age and nutritional status (JECFA, 2011). Infants and young children absorb
proportionately more lead than adults, typically absorbing around 50% of ingested
lead compared to around 10% in adults (WHO, 2010a). The absorption of lead is
also greater in people with dietary deficiencies of iron or calcium, which may be
widespread in economically deprived communities. Once absorbed, lead is distributed
to most organs of the body, including the central nervous system, liver and kidneys,
but the largest proportion (up to
90% in adults) is stored in bone (Barry, 1975).
Lead readily crosses the placenta exposing the fetus. The lead concentrations
in maternal and fetal blood are similar (Graziano, 1990; WHO, 1995).
Lead is present in breast milk from external sources of exposure or remobilized from
skeletal stores, though the concentrations in breast milk are low (Ettinger
et al., 2004; Ettinger et al., 2014).
The toxic effects of lead are wide-ranging and affect almost all body systems. Acute
The toxic effects
lead poisoning from a single exposure is relatively rare and chronic poisoning is
of lead are
more common; however, the clinical features of poisoning are similar in both cases. wide-ranging and
The presenting signs and symptoms are very variable in both adults and children and affect almost all
may include gastrointestinal, haematological and neurological effects. Young children body systems
are particularly vulnerable to the neurological toxicity of lead and this is the main
reason that lead is of public health concern. Lead also has toxic effects on the
reproductive, endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Important toxic effects are
summarized below
by body system.
The duration of illness in lead poisoning may be long and periodic, requiring the
monitoring of blood lead concentrations and repeated courses of antidotal
chelation therapy.
Patients with poor dental hygiene may have a ‘lead line’ (Burton or blue line) along the
gums (ten Bruggenkate et al., 1975). This line is composed of dark granules of lead
sulfide precipitated by the action of hydrogen sulfide (from bacterial degradation of
organic matter) on lead. There may also be grey spots
on the buccal mucosa and on the tongue (ten Bruggenkate et al., 1975).
Lead encephalopathy is a life-threatening condition and children can be left with mental
retardation, seizure disorders, blindness and hemiparesis (weakness of the entire left or
right side of the body) (Perlstein & Attala, 1966; Chisolm & Barltrop, 1979; Al
Khayat et al., 1997). Such severe impacts are now relatively uncommon in developed
countries but can still be seen in places where there are high levels of exposure and
limited or no access to diagnosis and treatment (Haefliger et al., 2009; Greig et al.,
2014). Analysis of a large case series of lead-poisoned children in Nigeria found that
concurrent infection with malaria
increased susceptibility to the neurotoxic effects of lead (Greig et al., 2014).
Chronic lead toxicity may also cause more subtle changes in neurological function in
children and adults. There is a large literature on the neurodevelopmental toxicity of
lead in children (Lidsky & Schneider, 2003; Bellinger, 2004a; Koller et al., 2004;
Needleman, 2004; NTP, 2012). The effects include reduced cognition and
behaviour scores, changes in attention (including attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder), impaired visual-motor and reasoning skills, and impaired social behaviour and
reading ability. Some of these effects have been found to persist into later childhood
and adulthood (Needleman et al., 1990; Fergusson & Horwood, 1993; White et al.,
1993; Tong et al., 1996; Fergusson et al., 1997; Tong, 1998; Tong et al., 1998;
Stokes et al., 1998). Delinquent behaviour has also been associated with lead exposure
(Needleman et al., 1990; Needleman et al., 1996; Dietrich et al., 2001; Wright et al.,
2008). Poor scores for social/ emotional functioning have been reported in preschool
children (Mendelsohn
et al., 1998).
In adults, case reports and small studies describe a higher incidence of malaise,
forgetfulness, headache, fatigue, lethargy, irritability, dizziness and weakness in
occupationally exposed adults (ATSDR, 2007). Lead exposure may also be associated
with a greater risk of neuropsychiatric and neurobehavioural problems (Valciukas et al.,
1978; Williamson & Teo, 1986; Stollery et al., 1991; Chia et
al., 1997; Bleecker et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2005; Schwartz et al., 2005).
Lead can cause both motor and sensory neuropathy. In individuals with severe, chronic
lead toxicity wrist drop and foot drop (inability to extend the wrist or foot) may be
seen. These effects are more commonly observed in adults than children with lead
toxicity (ATSDR, 2007). Motor weakness usually resolves once the individual is
removed from exposure but this may not be the case
with sensory neuropathies (Rubens et al., 2001).
Poor postural stability has been reported in children with mildly elevated blood lead
concentrations (Bhattacharya et al., 1990) and in lead-exposed workers
(Chia et al., 1996; Ratzon et al., 2000; Iwata et al., 2005).
Lead may also cause visual impairment and reduced hearing (Cavalleri et al., 1982;
Otto & Fox, 1993; Rothenberg et al., 2002). Hearing impairment in children may
occur even with blood lead concentrations below 10 µg/dL
(NTP, 2012).
3.2.3. Cardiovascular
Lead exposure is associated with an increased risk of hypertension in adults and
pregnant women, even at levels of exposure below 10 µg/dL (NTP, 2012). Significant,
though modest, associations have been found between lead concentrations in blood
and bone and blood pressure (Cheng, 2001; Nawrot et al., 2002; ATSDR, 2007). The
association is stronger with bone lead, suggesting that the increase in blood pressure is
related to the long-term effects of lead
exposure earlier in life (Cheng, 2001; Gerr et al., 2002).
3.2.4. Renal
Lead can cause damage to the renal tubules with impairment of renal function;
however, acute renal damage is usually reversible (Green et al., 1976; Chisolm
3.2.5. Endocrine
Environmental lead exposure has been associated with delays in sexual maturity in girls
(Selevan et al., 2003; Wu et al., 2003; NTP, 2012). Lead exposure has also been
associated with delays in growth and reduced growth (e.g. smaller
stature, smaller head circumference) in children (NTP, 2012).
Lead has long been known to be harmful in pregnancy and has been used as an
abortifacient (Bastrup-Madsen, 1950). Maternal lead exposure, even at low levels, may
be associated with reduced fetal growth, lower birth weight, preterm birth and
spontaneous abortion (NTP, 2012; Health Canada, 2013). Lead exposure is a risk
factor for hypertension in pregnancy (gestational hypertension) and high levels of
exposure may be a risk factor for pre-eclampsia, which can be
life-threatening for both the mother and baby (Troesken, 2006; CDC, 2010).
3.2.7. Haematological
High levels of exposure to lead reduce the synthesis of haem, which is necessary for the
production of red blood cells, resulting in anaemia (ATSDR, 2007). Coarse
basophilic stippling of red blood cells may be seen, though this is not found in all
patients with lead poisoning. Interference with haem synthesis also has other negative
impacts, for example haem is needed for the formation of cytochrome c, which is
essential for cellular respiration, and this may contribute
to the neurotoxicity of lead (ATSDR, 2007).
In children the greater risk of reduced cognitive ability, IQ, attention and visual-motor
and reasoning skills, as well as impacts on social behaviour all contribute to an
increased public health and economic burden. While the estimated IQ decrease in
children from lead poisoning is small (6.9 points over the blood concentration range
2.4 to 30 µg/dL), the impact at the population level can be important (Bellinger,
2004b; Lanphear et al., 2005). It is estimated that a mean IQ reduction of 3 points
from 100 to 97 would increase the number of individuals with an IQ below 100 by 8%
and there would be a 57% increase in individuals with an IQ below 70 (commonly
considered the cut-off for identifying individuals with intellectual disability). There
would also be a 40% reduction in potentially high-achieving individuals with an IQ
score greater than 130
(Bellinger, 2004b; JECFA, 2011).
In the case of blood pressure, a review by Healey et al. (2010) estimated that for the
Canadian population a change in blood lead concentrations in adults from 1 µg/dL to
4 µg/dL would be associated with an estimated increase in mean systolic blood
pressure of approximately 0.8 mmHg (0.11 kPa) among Caucasian males and 1.4
mmHg (0.19 kPa) in susceptible subpopulations. While the impact at the individual
level is small, increases in blood pressure are associated with age-specific increased
mortality rates for both ischaemic
heart disease and stroke (Lewington et al., 2002; Fewtrell et al., 2003).
Based on 2015 data, lead exposure is estimated to account for 12.4% of the global
burden of idiopathic intellectual disability, 2.5% of the global burden of
ischaemic heart disease and 2.4% of the global burden of stroke (IHME, 2016).
Point-of-care testing for lead involves the use of a portable analytical device that can
be taken and used near the site of exposure or patient care. These
devices can analyse very small samples taken from a capillary by finger-prick
The advantages of a point-of-care device are that: 1) it does not require skilled
laboratory personnel for its operation; 2) it can be used at locations where transport
of blood samples to an appropriate reference laboratory is difficult; and 3) the result
can be provided within a few minutes. It is extremely important that steps are taken to
avoid lead contamination. If the device is to be used in the field then it should be set
up in a clean room with adequate precautions
to prevent ingress of dust.
For all analytical methods some basic principles should be observed. Blood sampling
should be performed by a trained health-care worker (WHO, 2010c). Universal
biosafety precautions should be observed to avoid transmission of infection. With
both venous and capillary sampling there is a risk of lead contamination from the
skin. Sample collection should take place in a clean, lead-free environment and the
puncture site should be thoroughly cleansed beforehand (CDC, 2013). Venous blood
should be collected into tubes containing anticoagulant, preferably EDTA (CLSI, 2013).
All sampling equipment should be of good quality and certified free from trace metal
contamination. If blood samples need to be transported they should be kept cool, either
with cool-packs in an insulated container, or refrigerated until analysis (CLSI, 2013).
For point-of-care analysers, note should be taken of any specific temperature
requirements for sample storage. Care should be taken to avoid lead contamination of
samples
during storage, transportation and analysis.
1 https://www.cdc.gov/labstandards/lamp.html
No safe level of lead exposure has been identified; therefore, to determine the blood
lead concentration that indicates excessive exposure the value can be compared to a
reference value for the population as a whole. This is usually the geometric mean
blood lead concentration found in the highest 2.5% or 5% of the population, i.e.
the 97.5th or 95th percentile respectively. In the USA, for example, for children
under six years the reference value is currently 5 µg/dL, which is the 97.5th percentile
blood lead concentration (CDC, 2012). This same concentration is the 98th percentile
value for children under 7 years in France (Haut Conseil de la santé publique, 2014).
Germany has adopted reference values of 3.5 µg/dL for children aged 3-14 years, 7
µg/dL for women
and 9 µg/dL for men (Wilhelm, 2010).
• individual’s occupation,
work practices and those of
co-habitants;
• participation in, or proximity to,
lead recycling activities or
manufacturing with recycled lead
(e.g. fishing weights);
• hobbies that might involve
lead exposure;
• use of traditional medicines;
• diet and the possible consumption of
foods cultivated on contaminated land or
collected from contaminated water
bodies; and
• source of drinking-water, e.g. piped water
supply, wells, river etc.
Standards for lead in soil exist in a number of countries, and at least one country,
the USA, also has standards for lead in household dust. A global review of
standards for lead in residential soil found values ranging from 50 to 400 mg/kg
(Jennings, 2013). The standard for non-residential soils may be higher. In the USA,
for example, the federal standard for residential soil in areas where children play is 400
mg/kg (US EPA, 2001). The USA standard
for lead in household floor dust is 0.043 µg/cm2 (US EPA, 2001).
6.3.2. Air
As described above, various stages in the recycling process can
result in the release of lead fumes and particles in the air. Studies
have shown that there is high airborne lead exposure in lead-acid
battery recycling facilities
(Gottesfeld & Pokhrel, 2011; Were et al., 2012). Airborne lead
concentrations have been shown to correlate with blood lead
concentrations in workers (Were et al., 2012). Airborne lead
eventually settles and contaminates
surrounding surfaces.
A personal air sampling pump is worn by an individual to assess their exposure to lead
over a period of time, e.g. a working day (US EPA, 1993). This method monitors air
concentrations in a worker’s breathing zone to measure representative employee
exposures. The equipment comprises a battery-operated pump and sample medium,
which the individual can wear, for example, hung from their belt. A tube is attached to
the pump and the other end of the tube is clipped at the collar area close to the person’s
breathing zone. Samples are then taken
to a laboratory for analysis of total lead.
Examples of workplace exposure limits for airborne lead are given below: • Australia:
0.15 mg/m3 as an 8-hour time-weighted average (Safe Work
Australia, 2013)
• European Union: 0.15 mg/m3 as an 8-hour time-weighted average (EC, 1998)
• Mexico: 0.05 mg/m3 as an 8-hour time-weighted average, 40 hours per week
(CEC, 2016)
• USA: 0.05 mg/m3 as an 8-hour time-weighted average (OSHA, 1978).
A number of countries have ambient air quality standards for lead concentrations in the
outdoor environment. The guideline value set by WHO for the annual mean
concentration is 0.5 µg/m3 (WHO, 2000) but it should be noted that this is not a
health-based standard. A detailed discussion of methods for monitoring pollutants,
including lead, in ambient air can be found in the WHO publication Monitoring
ambient air quality for health impact assessment (EURO, 1999).
Examples of national standards are:
• Australia: ambient air quality standard: 0.5 µg/m3 averaged over one year (NEPC,
2016)
• China: ambient air quality standard: 0.5 µg/m3 averaged over one year, with a
seasonal limit of 1 µg/m3 (MoEP, 2012)
• EU limit value: 0.5 µg/m3 averaged over one year (EC, 2008)
• US National Air Ambient Quality Standard: 0.15 µg/m3, 3-month average
concentration (US EPA, 2016).
If the exposure history suggests that consumption of contaminated food and/ or water
is a source of exposure then these can be analysed. The Codex Alimentarius
provides a list of maximum permissible levels of lead in selected foods (FAO, 2016).
Most countries have a drinking-water standard for lead and
the WHO guideline value for drinking-water is 10 µg/L (WHO, 2011b).
Used lead-acid batteries should be transported as hazardous waste. The batteries should
Lead battery
be kept upright and separated by cardboard or other non-conducting material and then
recycling should only
placed in sealed containers or otherwise secured, e.g. be conducted at
on pallets covered with shrink wrap, to prevent them moving about. adequately equipped
7.2. Battery recycling and
To minimize lead exposure and environmental contamination, lead battery recycling regulated facilities
should only be conducted at adequately equipped and regulated facilities that have
the requisite engineering controls, trained staff, provision of
protective equipment, and environmental and occupational monitoring.
Other techniques to reduce dispersion of dust include keeping all open operations wet,
ensuring that batteries and slag are safely stored under cover and kept away from
water, and ensuring that the whole operating area is kept clean using wet methods and
HEPA vacuuming. There should be regular environmental
monitoring to ensure that control measures are effective.
• training on the hazards of lead and measures to prevent exposure; • providing, and
enforcing the use of, personal protective equipment (see below); • prohibition of
smoking, eating or drinking in the workplace;
• providing a segregated eating area well away from recycling operations; • providing a
clean air room, maintained at positive pressure and with filtered
air, for the removal of respirators;
• providing, and enforcing the use of, facilities for workers to change into clean work
clothing before starting work and to wash and change clothes at the end of the
working day;
• the implementation of a policy for regular blood lead testing, with a specified medical
removal level to remove an over-exposed worker from working around
lead, together with provisions for alternative employment or compensation.
Ensuring that workers wash and change before leaving the facility is important
for protecting household members from take-home exposure to lead.
The Basel Convention Secretariat devotes a chapter of its training manual to the
problem of controlling informal recycling and suggests a number of approaches
(UNEP, 2004). These include determining the likely scale of operations through a
market analysis of battery imports and sales, and identifying the points of interaction
between the informal and formal sectors, as well as collecting information about
recycling practices to determine where interventions can
be targeted.
Manufacturers,
The life-cycle of a lead-acid battery involves manufacturers, retailers, scrap dealers, retailers, scrap
secondary smelters and consumers. Each can play a part in preventing the supply of used dealers, secondary
lead-acid batteries to the informal recycling sector. Some suggested
smelters and
approaches include: consumers can each
play a
• encouraging the collection of used batteries by licensed retailers when part in reducing
replacement batteries are being bought, for example by requiring a returnable informal lead-acid
battery recycling
For these measures to be successful there is also a need for adequate technical
capacities, such as trained inspectors and laboratory facilities for the measurement of
lead in biological and environmental samples, as well as appropriate enforcement
measures. It is also important that the health sector, particularly at primary care level,
is able to recognise possible lead poisoning
and to initiate the necessary diagnostic and treatment interventions.
As this document indicates, recycling lead-acid batteries must be carried out with care
to minimize environmental contamination and protect the health of workers and
communities. While much of the responsibility for ensuring the sound management
of used lead-acid batteries lies with the environment sector, the health sector must also
play its part. This includes ensuring that health-care practitioners have training on, and
resources for, the diagnosis and management of lead poisoning, educating local
communities on the health hazards of lead, and taking action to inform the responsible
authorities when lead poisoning associated with recycling is discovered. Furthermore,
health ministries should aim to ensure the availability of laboratory capacity for blood
lead testing and should work with industry to reduce employee exposures.