Implementation Implementation Understanding of Understanding of Idea of the Idea of the Expected Savings Expected Expected Net Savings Expected

ed Expected Net Savings Expected Project

Sr. No. Area Name of Idea Overall Rating Cost Rating Difficulty Rating Time Rating Savings Rating Solution - Investment Operational Cost Point Person
Difficulty - Description Difficulty - Rating Process - Description Process - Rating Description Solution - Rating (Lacs/yr) (capital) (Lacs) (Lacs/yr) (Lacs/yr) Time (months)

73 General P&ID, Drawings, etc 63 5 3.57 4 0 4 3 5 0 1 0 0 4 Meh

78 ETP Effluent Flow 46 0 2.25 4 1 3 2 2 4 0 0 4 5 Darp

Reduction of Fatty Acid from Cooling

37 FADP Tower 62 5 2.00 4 1 2 2 2 5 1 0 5 5 Nish

26 FADP Improve Thermosyphon Efficiency 53 4 2.17 4 1 2 2 3 10 15 5 5 5 Nish

32 FADP Improving Control System 51 5 1.57 2 1 2 1 3 10 5 0 10 12 Nish

25 FADP Heat Exchanger Networks 46 4 3.52 3 1 3 4 4 15 25 5 10 10 Nish

81 MEE Condensate Water Usage 64 5 3.47 4 2 4 3 4 15 2 1 14 5 Darp

95 GDP Yield of GDP Plant 56 5 2.64 3 2 3 3 2 15 1 0 15 10 Meh

7 HYD Heat Recovery 57 4 3.70 4 2 3 5 4 20 20 5 15 5 Nish

44 FADP Steam Trap Monitoring 70 4 2.00 5 1 2 2 2 20 20 10 10 2 Nish

Actual Cost & Usage of Compressed

45 Utility Air/Nitrogen 42 4 2.25 3 1 3 2 2 20 5 10 10 10 Meh

0 Test Ideal 53 3 3.47 4 2 4 3 4 30 50 5 25 5

20 FADP 7D2 56 4 3.17 4 2 3 3 4 30 5 10 20 5 Nish

80 FSP PreCon % Gly 63 5 2.52 4 2 2 3 3 45 1 0 45 4 Darp

1 HYD Recovery of Hydrogen Gas 30 3 2.63 2 2 2 3 4 60 60 15 45 15 Nish

50 AOS Spray Dryer 51 3 2.47 4 2 3 2 3 60 60 40 20 5 Meh

56 Utility Boiler House ( Dinesh`s Dream) 27 1 1.82 1 3 1 3 3 80 600 20 60 24 Nish

90 GDP Distilling High Salt Cr. Gly 42 4 1.36 2 3 3 1 1 100 30 2 98 15 Meh

46 Utility Steam Generation & Distribution 75 4 2.57 5 4 3 2 4 150 35 10 140 2 Meh

Losses, Condensate Recovery

62 AOS Reducing Color & AO Consumption 75 4 2.00 5 4 2 2 2 150 15 5 145 2 Nish

8 HYD FSP-HYD-DIST 61 3 4.52 3 4 4 5 5 300 50 20 280 8 Nish

Yield Improvement (DOS &

96 FSP & FADP 6 separation efficincy) 65 4 3.52 4 4 3 4 4 450 1 30 420 5 Darp

6 HYD New Product - Any product -7 0 1.25 1 0 2 1 1 0 24 Darp

61 ETP/FSP Polyglycerol Treatment 45 0 1.81 4 0 3 2 1 0 5 Darp

67 AOS Regeneration Hot Air 49 0 3.52 4 0 3 4 4 0 5 Meh

1002
Sr. No. Area Name of Idea Overall Rating

52 AOS Evaluate use of Molten Sulphur 67

63 AOS AV/GLC/SV online analysers 62

2 Delta Phase Improve DOS in section 101 to 99.5% 58

30 Delta Phase Enhance precon efficiency 56

Drop of Temperature in deaerator to 95

45 Utilities deg 55

23 Delta Phase To avoid carryover of glycerol to 55

evaporator condensate

Reduce compressed Air & N2 requirements

67 Utilities 54
by 30%

Improving sweet water Treatment /

1 Delta Phase 54
Filtration to achieve 120 tpd per batch

54 AOS WFD effluent to ETP 54

0 Test Ideal 53

58 Section 6/7 Non Alcohol target < 7 53

Reduction in Water consumption to

26 General 48
1200m3/day

Stack/Exhaust Heat Recovery across the

43 General 43
plant

8 Delta Phase Continous flow from FSP to FADP 43

39 Utilities OBR from 1200 to 1600 42

20 Delta Phase Section 105: Operate only on BB3 38

25 Delta Phase Corrosion in Sec 105 and 128 33

31 AOS Brown particles in Paste Drums 33

18 AOB Prevent Line Choking 33

Heat recovery from steam condensate and

3 Delta Phase 28
zero waste of condensate to ETP

19 Delta Phase Improve Glycerine quality 28

15 General 6E4 Heat Recovery 27

46 Section 6/7 Separation of Alcohol water in 7D27 26

70 General Energy generators instead of PRV 25

33 AOB Replace Thermic Systems with steam 12

71 AOS Making LA viable -5

 Implementation
Cost Rating Difficulty Rating Time Rating Savings Rating Difficulty -
Description

0 3.17 5 0

5 2.17 4 1

4 3.00 4 3

5 3.00 3 1

4 2.47 4 2

5 2.29 3 1

3 2.47 3 4

4 2.83 4 1

5 2.17 3 1

3 3.47 4 2

3 1.52 3 4

4 2.25 3 3

4 2.17 2 3

3 2.52 3 3

4 2.25 3 1
3 2.64 3 2

4 2.00 2 0

3 2.36 3 0

2 2.29 3 2

0 2.52 3 0

0 2.64 3 0

0 2.47 3 0

0 2.00 3 0

0 1.63 3 0

1 1.63 1 2

0 1.52 1 0
 Understanding of Idea of the
Implementation Understanding of Idea of the
Process - Solution -
Difficulty - Rating Process - Rating Solution - Rating
Description Description

3 3 4

2 2 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 2 3

2 3 2

3 2 3

3 4 2

2 2 3

4 3 4

1 2 2

3 2 2

2 2 3

2 3 3

3 2 2
3 3 2

2 2 2

4 2 2

2 3 2

2 3 3

3 3 2

3 2 3

2 2 2

1 2 3

1 2 3

1 2 2
 Expected Expected
Expected Savings Net Savings Expected Project
Investment Operational Cost
(Lacs/yr) (Lacs/yr) Time (months)
(capital) (Lacs) (Lacs/yr)

0 2

1 1 0 1 5

100 1 30 70 5

5 1 0 5 8

50 25 20 30 5

6 1 0 6 8

200 50 20 180 10

15 40 5 10 5

3 1 0 3 8

30 50 5 25 5

300 60 30 270 10

80 5 15 65 10

100 45 5 95 15

110 40 30 80 8

15 30 10 5 8
35 75 5 30 8

0 10 1 -1 15

60 15 -15 8

60 100 20 40 10

0 8

0 0 0 0 8

0 10

0 8

0 10

15 600 0 15 18

0 24
Point Person

Sou

Darp

Darp

Darp

Sou

Nish

Sou

Nish

Sou

Nish

Darp

Sou

Nish

Darp
Nish

Sou

Sou

Darp

Darp

Darp

Darp

Nish

Nish

Nish

Nish