Direct Retainers

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

DIRECT RETAINERS

Nayab 73

Compiled by Areeba Irfan 85


Tehniat Zehra 23
Dur e Shahwar 20
Sania Shoaib 34
Forces on a Prosthesis
Forces acting on a prosthesis

1. Towards the tissue


2. Away from the tissue
3. Across the tissue
In Maxilla – Gravity
In Mandible – adherend foods , chewing

2
Direct Retainer

“Component of Removeable partial denture applied to resist the


movement away from the teeth or basal tissue” – provides retention

Primary retention – Direct retainers

Secondary Retention – Other Components of RPD i.e


Minor and Major connectors

3
Components of a Direct retainer
1. Occlusal Rest - Support
2. Retentive Arm – Retention
3. Reciprocal arm – Stabilization *may act as
indirect retainer to some degree

4
Basic principles of clasp Designing

Principle Of Prevention of Balanced Force


Stress Breakers
encirclement Cervical Movement Transmission

Encircling More than 180 Occlusal rest must be Each retentive arm Clasp retainers should be
degrees in the greatest designed to resist should be opposed by a formed in such a way to
circumference of tooth cervical movement reciprocal arm to resist avoid lingual or tipping
transient pressure abutment
movement when distal
edentulous arch is
present 5
Basic principles of clasp Designing

Best Possible
Resist dislodging component
Cross arch stability Clasp Engagement
forces locations
Retentive clasp should Different path of Amount of retention Reciprocal arm – junc of
be bilaterally opposed in escapement for clasp atleast enough to resist middle and gingival third
class 2 or class 3 cases terminal and path of dislodging forces
removal for prosthesis Retentive arm (2/3rd) -
middle third over HOC

terminal End of retentive


arm – gingival third 6
Types of Direct Retainers
Extra Coronal
Intra Coronal 1. Outside tooth
contour margins
Retains on
1. Within the tooth abutment tooth
contour through
2. Follows Key and 2. Clasps - most
key way common
mechanism for 3. Spring loaded
interlocking device
4. Flexible clips or
rings
7
Clasps designed - accommodate
functional movement
Address the concerns of class 1 lever which can result in harmful tipping and
torquing of abutment tooth

Two strategies

1 Mesial rest Concept


2 use of a flexible arm

Extra Coronal Retainers 8


RPI Clasp
Extends up to Triangular fossa in premolars
Extends up to central fossa in molars
Rounded outline
Mesial Rest Allow ball and socket movement

Distal Proximal Plate Guide plane contacts proximal plate


Put forces on abutment in horizontal direction

I Bar Retainer
Located in midfacial part pf gingival 3rd
Tapering end
Involve0.01 inch undercut
Arm is atleast 4mm from gingival margin
Less torque but also less retention

9
RPI
modification
approaches
Approach 1 Approach 2 Approach 3
(Healthy Abutment) (Compromised Abutment)
Proximal plate minor Proximal plate Proximal plate
connector contacts entire minor connector minor connector only
length of proximal tooth extends from marginl contacts 1mm of gingival
surface ridge to junction of portion of guiding plane
middle and gingival
third
10
RPA Clasp
Mesial Rest

Distal Proximal Plate

Indications​
Circumferential Aker's Clasp 1. exaggerated buccal or lingual tilts
Retainer (Wrough wire) 2. severe tissue undercut
3. shallow buccal vestibule

PRESENTATION TITLE 11
Bar Clasp / Roach's Clasp
• Mechanically and functionally effective
• Covers little tooth surface
• Good aesthetics
• Have rigid clasp
• Retentive arm approaches from gingival third

Indications​
1.small degree of undercut in cervical third
2. for tooth supported PD or tooth support Mod
areas
3. Esthetic considerations are important

PRESENTATION TITLE 12
Combination Clasp
Advantages Disadvantages
1. Greater degree of flexibility 1. Extra steps in fabrication
2. Esthetic advantage 2. Distort easily
3. Less accurately adapted to tooth

Indications​
1.Large tissue undercut
2.Abutment tooth with mesiobuccaol undercut
3. Esthetic considerations are important

PRESENTATION TITLE 13
Circumferential Clasp
Advantages Disadvantages

1. Easiest to make and repair 1. Covers large surface area


2. Derives excellent support 2. Food accumulation
and retention

Indications​
1.Tooth supported partial dentures
2.in cases of moderate to severe mobility
3. Esthetic considerations are important

PRESENTATION TITLE 14
Intra Coronal Retainers
1 -Consist of a metal receptacle
(Matrix)
15

2 – closely fitting part (Patrix)

PRESENTATION TITLE
Intra coronal retainers
Advantages Disadvantages

1. Elimination of visible 1. Required preparation of abutments


retentive and support 2. Complicated fabrication
componenets 3. Wear resulting in loss of frictional
2. Provides horizontal resistance
stabilization 4. Diifficult to repair and replace
3. Stimulates underlying
tissues

Contra Indications​
1.Large pulp
2.Short Crown

PRESENTATION TITLE 16
Reference:-
McCracken's Removable Partial Prosthodontics

17
Thank you

You might also like