Scribd
Upload
16 views3 pages

Baber

The document contains 3 tables analyzing the relationship between various psychological factors. Table 1 shows the coefficients from a regression model predicting performance. Tables 2 and 3 show correlations and descriptive statistics, respectively, for the variables in the regression: psychological illness (psyill), presentation skills (presn), self-directed learning (sledr), and performance. Self-directed learning had a positive association with performance, while psychological illness and presentation skills had negative associations.

Uploaded by

Abdul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16 views3 pages

Baber

The document contains 3 tables analyzing the relationship between various psychological factors. Table 1 shows the coefficients from a regression model predicting performance. Tables 2 and 3 show correlations and descriptive statistics, respectively, for the variables in the regression: psychological illness (psyill), presentation skills (presn), self-directed learning (sledr), and performance. Self-directed learning had a positive association with performance, while psychological illness and presentation skills had negative associations.

Uploaded by

Abdul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Table 1: Coefficients

95%
Confidence
Coefficient Standardized interval for Collinearity
Unstandardized s Coefficients B Statistics
Mode Lower Upper
l B Std Error Beta t Sig. Bound Bound Tolerance VIF

1 (Constant) 3.868 0.383 10.109 0 3.113 4.622

psyill -0.232 0.064 -0.221 -3.611 0 -0.359 -0.105 0.456 2.191

presen -0.412 0.058 -0.41 -7.144 0 -0.526 -0.299 0.522 1.917

sledr 0.273 0.065 0.281 4.224 0 0.146 0.401 0.389 2.572

Table 2: Correlations

psyill presn sledr perfrom


Pearson 1 .597** -.722** -.669**
psyill Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 0.000 0.000

N 209 209 209 209


Pearson .597 **
1 -.672 **
-.731**
presn Correlation
0.000 0.000 0.000
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 209 209 209 209
Pearson -.722 **
-.672 **
1 .716**
sledr Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 0.000 0.000

N 209 209 209 209


Pearson -.669 **
-.731 **
.716 **
1
perfrom Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 0.000 0.000

N 209 209 209 209

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics

Std.
Minimu Maximu Deviatio Skewnes Kurtosi
N Range m m Mean n s s
Statisti Statisti Statisti Std. Statisti Std.
c c Statistic Statistic c Statistic Statistic Error c Error
0.16 0.33
psyill 209 4 1 5 2.9362 0.77338 0.263 8 -0.179 5
0.16 0.33
presn 209 4 1 5 2.7378 0.80632 0.603 8 0.437 5
0.16 0.33
sledr 209 4 1 5 2.866 0.83359 0.42 8 -0.299 5
0.16 0.33
perfrom 209 4 1 5 2.8394 0.81168 0.476 8 -0.152 5
Valid N
(listwise
) 209

Demographics

Table 1: Team Members Gender

Frequency percent
valid Male
Female
Total

Table 2: Project Manager Gender

Frequency percent
valid Male
Female
Total

Table 3: Team Members Age

Frequency percent
valid 15-25
26-35
36-45
46-55
56 or above

Table 4: Project Manager Age

Frequency percent
valid 15-25
26-35
36-45
46-55
56 or above

Table 5: Team Members Designation

Frequency percent
Valid Project Manager
Project Team supervisor
Project Team coordinator
Project team member

Table 6: Project Manager Designation

Frequency percent
Valid Project Manager
Project Team supervisor
Project Team coordinator
Project team member

Table 7: Team Members Experience

Frequency percent
valid <1
1-6
6-12
13 or above

Table 8: Project Manager Experience

Frequency percent
valid <1
1-6
6-12
13 or above

You might also like