ICT - Rice Farmers - Kuje

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume VII Issue VI June 2023
Evaluation of Factors Influencing the use of Information and

Communication Technologies (ICTS) Among Smallholder Rice
Farmers in Kuje Area Council of Fct, Abuja
Edwin E. Idu1, Isaac Adedeji Ola1, Samson Olayemi Sennuga1*, Joseph Bamidele3, Funso O. Alabuja
2, Bankole Osho-Lagunju1, Timipre Joseph Preyor4, Adebisi Olateju OMOLE5
1Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of
Abuja, FCT, P.M.B. 117, Abuja, Nigeria
2Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Abuja, FCT, P.M.B.
117, Abuja, Nigeria
3Faculty of Business and Law, University of Northampton, Waterside Campus, University Drive,
Northampton NN1 5PH.
4Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Royal Agricultural University, Stroud Road,
Cirencester, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom, GL7 6JS
5Head, Extension Services, FCT Agricultural Development Programme. Abuja
*Corresponding Author’s
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7685
Received: 14 June 2023; Revised: 26 June 2023; Accepted: 01 July 2023; Published: 10 July 2023
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate the usage of ICTs, which ones are popular among the farmers
and whether certain factors influenced usage. This study was to fill a research gap on ICT usage among
smallholder rice farmers in rural communities of Kuje area council, Federal capital Territory. The study
involved a simple random sampling of 100 smallholder rice farmers with varying numbers of respondents in
the study area’s communities. This study involved the use of structured interview questionnaires on the
perceptions, level and constraints of ICT usage. The data concerning the demographics of farmers,
perceptions, level and constraints of ICT usage were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics
(frequencies, percentages) and data concerning factors influencing ICT usage among the smallholder rice
farmers was analyzed using inferential statistics (Binary Logistic regression). The results indicated that
majority of respondents (52%) together of the respondents were under 40 years. 82% of respondents
strongly agreed and agreed respectively that the use of ICTs helps me to increase their income. 86% and
90% majority of respondents regularly used mobile phones and Radio devices on a frequent basis for rice
farming activities respectively. The main constraints of the farmers in the study included, Poor network and
reception, Inadequate power supply and Language barrier. Others being high cost of recharge credit, high
cost of ICT tools and Expensive usage. There is the urgency of Agricultural Extension agencies to take
effective measures to strengthen extension services in order to change the percentage use of ICTs by farmers.
Keywords: Smallholder, farmers, usage, ICTs, extension, rice
INTRODUCTION
Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) offer a new way to spread knowledge among
individuals in different parts of the world. ICTs, as defined by The Technical Centre for Agricultural and
Rural Cooperation (CTA) 2003, are devices that process and transmit information through electronic
channels including radio, television, fixed and mobile phones, computers, Pocket pcs, and the internet.
Page 1025
www.rsisinternational.org
Examples of readily available ICT components/devices include radio, television, multi-media systems
(VCDS, DVDS, VHS, overhead projectors), telephones (landlines and mobile phones), Internet (e-mailing,
Web-browsing, telephoning), computers, and personal digital assistants (Fadiji, 2017; Ayeni et al. 2023).
Among the others are media players, geographic information systems, GPS, cable television, online
newspapers, e-books, journals, tablet computers, smart phones, iPod, and iPad. All necessary stakeholders,
including farmers, extension agents, researchers, administrators, marketers, cooperatives, agro-processors,
and non-governmental groups, must be informed to accomplish this, (Ladele, Igodan, Agunga and Fadairo,
2015). According to Nyarko and Kozari (2021), around the world, information and communication
technology in agriculture has been identified as the key factor in the sector’s growth. A few mobile
payment systems give farmers access to Informational resources to which they have access to crucial data
such as meteorological data and disease outbreaks, in addition to offering a quick means of communication
(Campenhout, Spielman and Lecoutere, 2020).
Agricultural Extension has led the way in providing the farming community with sufficient information over
the years, not only to boost productivity but also to enhance the level of their life (Danso-Abbeam, Ehiakpor
and Aidoo, 2018). In order to successfully transmit technology into the farming community, evolutionary
changes had been made while keeping in mind the need for agricultural growth. Fabregas, Harigaya and
Ramrattan (2022) asserted that Information and communication technology (ICT) are one of the essential
partners that helped to make agriculture extension more attractive and practicable.
In Africa, small-scale agriculture provides the majority of people with a living. Agents of development face
a significant challenge in getting agricultural information to these rural residents (Toeniessen, Adesina and
De Vries, 2008; Adeyemi et al., 2023). Notwithstanding the creation of various organizations and the
support of numerous extensions approaches and strategies aimed at increasing farmers’ production,
agricultural performance is still lacking, leading to a continuation of food imports and an increase in the
index of consumer prices (Emran, Krupnik, Aravindakshan, Kumar and Pittelkow, 2021). Information rates
differ within and between people and range from decision-making to psychological to some more
individualized needs (Alaybek, Dalal and Dade, 2022). While basic and frequently shared information needs
are derived from physiological needs, individual needs vary from person to person. Individual information
needs can be influenced by a variety of interconnected factors, such as social, cultural, and economic. Age,
education, gender, and income of the information seeker are some other factors that can affect information
needs (Adeshina, 2021).
Factors influencing the usage of ICT
Agricultural technology adoption factors have been extensively studied, according to James (2015).
According to Loevinsohn, Sumberg, Diagne and Whitefield (2013) claim that farmers’ actions about
whether and how to utilize novel technologies are influenced by the continuous interplay between the
technology’s characteristics and a variety of situations and circumstances. After analyzing the chosen
studies and chosen experiences from developing nations, Macire, Robert, and Christopher (2016)
highlighted that the relative advantage, simplicity, compatibility, observability, social influence, and
information quality of ICTs were found to be factors favoring the use of ICTs on agricultural input
information in the access to and use of agricultural input information. The cost of ICT services has been
noted as one factor that negatively impacts the use of ICTs for agricultural input information. The following
study’s discussion of these elements in more detail:
Relative advantage
Relative advantage (or superiority) is the measure of how much an innovation is thought to be superior to
the concept it replaces. It is more often defined by means of economic profitability and/or social benefit.
They also referred to the perceived usefulness of an innovation, or “the degree to which the consumer
Page 1026
perceives that using a particular scheme will maximize his or her economic output,” as the relative
advantage of the innovation (Macire et al., 2016).
Simplicity
Macire et al., (2016) explained that the extent to which an innovation is considered to be understandably and
practically straightforward is determined by how simple it is. Any revolutionary idea can be characterized
along the range of complexity and simplicity. Some innovations are immediately evident in what they mean
to potential users, while others are not. The majority of studies use simplicity rather than complexity
because it has a positive impact on how an innovation is used (Sahin, 2006).
Compatibility
According to James (2015), one of the most important variables affecting how quickly a new innovation is
adopted is the perception of its compatibility or acceptability. According to the author, an innovation’s
compatibility is measured by how closely it is thought to adhere to the values, experiences, and needs of
potential adopters. In order to give the new idea meaning and make it seem more recognizable, the person
needs compatibility.
Cost
The cost of ICT services makes one ‘s use for agricultural input data prohibitive. For instance, the high cost
of mobile devices and services prevented many Tanzanian rural farmers from using tigokilimo. According
to estimates by Palmer, Ciccarelli, Falkmer, and Parsons (2014), the majority of SENEKELA users in Mali
thought the cost was prohibitive. The empirical study led to the conclusion that the expense prevents farmers
in developing nations from using ICTs to access information about agricultural inputs.
Social Influence
In their research, Muhammad, Adesiji, Tyabo, Muhammed, and Loko (2019) found that age, marital status,
and educational level all had positive relationships with and had a significant impact on ICT use. The author
also stated that education helps farmers become more aware of, have access to, and use ICT. This suggests
that farmers are more likely to use ICT to look up agricultural information and thus increase productivity if
they are more educated. Contrarily, married farmers had parental responsibilities, which affected their level
of experience, decision-making, and use of ICT.
Applications of Information and Communication Technologies
ICT as a yardstick for effective communication
Agricultural extension communication specifically aims to raise participants’ quality of life (farmers and
extension personnel) through sharing agricultural information with others in the context of development. As
a result, the effectiveness of the communication methods, channels, and techniques may be a factor in
whether or not the suggested technologies and packages are adopted. The limitations and constraints found
in traditional and official communication channels have made ICT use more relevant. Due to its broad reach
and coverage, according to Omotayo (2015), a more helpful and effective method for creativity in
communication in the context of agriculture is necessary.
ICT as a yardstick for access to improved seed varieties
Over 13.55 million smallholder farmers got subsidized inputs (better seeds and fertilizers) in 2014 via their
mobile phones and the Electronic Wallet (e-wallet) system, according to data from the Federal Ministry of
Page 1027
Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD). As of 2014, around 14 million smallholder farmers were
registered on the system, despite problems with network coverage, awareness, and the availability of
fertilizer in some regions. This began in Nigeria (FMARD 2014). Nigeria, the first country in Africa, was
where the electronic wallet system for transferring subsidized supplies to farmers was first implemented.
ICT as a yardstick for better market linkage services
According to Sennuga (2020), his study’s qualitative interviews showed that smallholder farmers used their
mobile phones in a wide range of ways. The ability to access market information on agricultural inputs such
as fertilizers, herbicides, enhanced seeds, current market pricing, and direct interaction with traders and
purchasers were some of these. Others included finding out the availability and amount of a given item in
the markets and exchanging market information and experiences with surrounding farmers in order to boost
income. These results demonstrated that respondents typically utilized their mobile devices in a timely
fashion, enabling them to successfully carry out market research in a number of markets. The ability of
farmers to access markets and conduct business may be greatly enhanced by mobile phones, which are
clearly beneficial (Achukwu et al., 2023).
Constraints of ICTs usage among farmers
There are many obstacles to farmers using ICT in developing nations, especially in rural areas. Several of
these obstacles undoubtedly prevent farmers from using ICTs to their advantage. William (2018) in this
section in his study presented several significant ones.
Poor Technical infrastructure
There is often a lack of adequate technical infrastructure in rural areas. According to Satish and Thompson
(2012), this is because the resources required to establish any significant infrastructure are too restrictive in
terms of the availability of crucial ICTs facilities, equipment, and structures.
Lack of access to ICT
Given the foregoing, it makes sense that rural areas will have constrained access to ICT services because of
a lack of ICT infrastructure. Poor individuals lack access to education, communication, and information,
according to Fassil and Maria (2012). The majority of Africans who reside in rural areas most frequently use
radio, television, and newspapers, according to Wulystan and Ronald (2013). According to Dokubo et al.,
(2023) traditional media such as radios, movies, televisions, slides, photos, exhibitions, and field
demonstrations have all been employed to speed up information flow in rural areas of developing nations.
High cost of ICTs
In addition, contemporary ICTs like computers, Internet cafes, Telecenters, GPS, and others are essentially
nonexistent in rural communities if they have not been provided by NGOs, private operators, or in the case
of government projects funded by development agencies, which typically end with the project duration.
Research objectives
The broad objective of this study is to evaluate the factors influencing the use of information and
communication technology among smallholder rice farmers in Kuje area council of F.C.T to address the
problem of inadequate provision of agricultural information. Therefore, the specific objectives of this study
are to:
1. describe the socio-economic characteristics of smallholder rice farmers in the study area
2. assess the perceptions of smallholder rice farmers towards ICT usage
Page 1028
3. determine the factors that influences ICT usage among smallholder rice farmers
4. assess the level of ICT usage for the acquisition of agricultural information among smallholder rice
farmers
5. identify constraints influencing ICT usage among smallholder rice farmers.
METHODOLOGY
Description of Study area
This investigation took place in the Federal Capital Territory’s Kuje Area Council. Its about 40 kilometers
southwest of Abuja. Kuje is a short drive from the brand-new Centenary City Development. Kuje is
frequently referred to as the “food basket of Abuja” because of the abundance of farmland and greenery
there. Kuje’s most developed area right now is Kuchiyako. According to the 2006 census, it has a 1.644
km2 area and 97.367 residents.
Sampling techniques and size
Simple random sampling was the sample selection method used in this research study. To be sure, every unit
or department in the population of the study has a known chance of being included in the sample, making
this sampling technique the most appropriate for this research project. 100 farmers from the five villages in
the Kuje Area council were used for the project.
Table 1: Sampled population and farming communities
No. Farming Communities Number of farmers

1 Dafara 20
2 Bamishi 20
3 Gaube 20
4 Zango 20
5 Kusaki 20
Total 100
Source: Field survey, 2023
Method of data collection
A formalized schedule or form that includes a collection of thoughtfully crafted questions for data collection
is known as a questionnaire (Wong et al., 2012). Structured questionnaires are one of the data collection
methods that was used for the study. Data from the respondents was gathered using the questionnaires. For
randomly chosen members of the different groups, the questionnaire included both open-ended and closed-
ended questions. A survey’s questionnaire was also created to be used by a diverse sample of respondents
drawn from the large respondent population (Burns, 2015).
Data analysis
Using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS software version 25.0), the data acquired was
examined. Calculating frequencies and percentages for the purpose of defining the socioeconomic
characteristics of small-scale rice farmers, level of ICT usage, perception of ICT usage and constraints
influencing ICT usage among smallholder farmers in the study region required the use of descriptive
statistics. While the determination of the factors that influence the usage of ICTs required inferential
statistics.
Page 1029
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 2: Socioeconomic Characteristics of Respondents
Socioeconomic characteristics Frequency (n=100) Percentage (%)

Age (years)
Below 30 16 16.0
31-40 36 36.0
41-50 37 37.0
51 and above 11 11.0
Gender
Female 53 53.0
Male 47 47.0
Marital status
Married 76 76.0
Single 18 18.0
Widowed 6 6.0
Educational status
No formal education 38 38.0
Primary school 26 26.0
Middle secondary school 16 16.0
Secondary school 12 12.0
Tertiary education 8 8.0
Household size
1-5 14 14.0
6-10 61 61.0
Household headship status
I am not a household head 48 48.0
I am a household head 52 52.0
Rice farming experience in years
1-5 10 10.0
6-10 23 23.0
11-20 43 43.0
Farmland size
less than 1 ha 32 32.0
1-5 ha 58 58.0
6-10 ha 10 10.0
Annual income ( ₦ )
100,000 – 400,000 24 24.0
401,000 – 700,000 37 37.0
701,000 – 1,000,000 27 27.0
1,000,000 and above 12 12.0
Source: Field Survey, 2022
Page 1030
The results from this study revealed that there was a larger majority of females (53.0%) engaged in rice
farming compared to males (47.0%) owing to a larger perceived participation of women in agriculture.
According to the results of the respondents’ marital status survey, 76% of respondents were married,
compared to 18% who were single and 6 who had been widowed (have lost their spouse). The nature of
societal conventions and ideas that people living in a rural community are expected to get married as early
as late twenties for men and early-mid-twenties for women makes this finding seem valid and true. The idea
that most farmers only have a very low level of education is a common 3misconception about their literacy.
The study’s conclusions indicate that only 38.0% of farmers’ education is formal. Table 2 above reveals that
only 26% of respondents completed primary school, 28% completed secondary school, and only 8% went
on to further their education in tertiary institutions. According to the aforementioned findings, 62% of
respondents had some level of literacy, albeit to varying degrees. The results contradict the widely held
belief that most farmers are uneducated. As a result, it may be thought that the farming community in the
study area is a suitable setting for the adoption of technologies. A large household with at least 6 members
was anticipated to be the perceived size of the respondents’ households in the study area. According to
the results of this study, 61 respondents had families with between 6 and 10 members (an average of
8 people per household), followed by 25 respondents with families with 11 or more members, and 14
respondents with families with between 1 and 5 members. According to the research’s findings, a slightly
higher proportion of respondents who were not household heads (52%) than those who were (48%) was
discovered. Six respondents had widowed status, (as shown by Table 2); as a result, it was necessary for one
person to assume more responsibility for household duties, including farming, as the only head of the
household.
The result from this study showed that 10% of farmers only had farming experience of 1-5 years (3 years on
average), with 23% of respondents having farming experience of 6-10 years (8 years on average), followed
by a 43% majority of farmers who have 11-20 years (16 years on average) experience and a 24% minority
of farmers who have 21 years of experience and above. Data shown in the table above revealed that a 67%
majority of farmers had farming experience of 11 years and above. This shows that majority Farmers in the
study area were well conversant and indulgent in the cultivation of rice. However, results from this study
contradicts Sennuga’s observation as a joint majority of 68% respondents had access to cultivate 1-10
hectares of farmland, though their source of acquisition of land were unknown. Only 32 percent of
respondents had access to less than 1 hectare in cultivating rice while a 58% and 10% of respondents
cultivated rice on 1-5 hectares (3 hectares on average) and 6-10 hectares (8 hectares on average) of land
respectively.
Results on the annual income of rice farmers revealed that a larger majority (61%) had an income from
cultivating rice between 100,000 and 700,000 naira, followed by 27% who had an income between 701,000
and 1,000,000 naira, and the least proportion (12%), who had an annual income of 1,000,000 naira and
above. The majority of farmers in rural communities were able to feed their families and send their kids to
school, according to Sennuga and Conway (2020), who also show that this result is supported by their
research. Additionally, because rice is a staple food and there is a high demand from consumers across
Nigeria, the annual income level from the study’s results shows the viability in the cultivation of rice crops.
Perceptions of rural farmers towards the use of ICTs
Table 4: Perception of smallholder farmers towards IC usage
n (no’ of respondents who used

Percentage
ICTs) = 51
Strongly Strongly
PERCEPTION OF ICT USAGE Agree Neutral Disagree Total%
agree disagree
The use of ICTs helps me to
18.00% 82.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100%
increase my income
Page 1031
ICT promotes access to credit 4.00% 31.00% 59.00% 6.00% 0.00% 100%
The use of ICT saves time 26.00% 66.00% 5.00% 3.00% 0.00% 100%
The use of ICT in rice farming
14.00% 86.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100%
leads to improved productivity
ICT would be more effective if
53.00% 35.00% 10.00% 2.00% 0.00% 100%
local language is used
Source: Field survey, 2022
Data revealed rice farmers’ responses to certain perceptions towards ICT usage and are thus:12% and 82%
of respondents strongly agreed and agreed respectively that the use of ICTs helps me to increase their
income. The perception that ICT promotes access to credit was attested to by 34% majority of respondents,
followed by 59% undecided alongside only 6% perceiving that ICT does not promote access to ICT. 92% of
respondents agreed to the perception that the use of ICT saves time with 5% being indifferent in their choice
and only 3% disagreed to this claim. Respondents all agreed that the use of ICT in rice farming leads to
improved productivity. 88% of respondents also perceived that ICT would be more effective if local
language is used, while 10% and 2% remained indifferent and disagreeing respectively on the said claim.
Results from this study show that majority of the respondents had a positive perception of ICT use towards
its benefits to their farming activities.
Factors that influences ICT usage among smallholder rice farmers
It was found that age was insignificant in the use of ICT tools by 116% (with p= 0.834). Middle aged
farmers were more predisposed to using ICTS than younger farmers. Marital status of farmers had an
influence on their use of ICT tools where married farmers were less likely to use ICTs significantly
(p=0.058) by 7.3%. In addition, farmers with large household sizes were not keen on using ICT tools by
76.5% with the p-value of 0.784. In addition, Farmers who had more education were found to increase their
ICT tool usage significantly (p=0.000) by 131.530%. Rice farmers who were heads of households were not
inclined to using ICT tools by 90% with a p-value of 0.893. Farmers with more years in farming were
relatively less likely to use ICT tools by 48.10% with the p-value of 0.358. Farmers’ who cultivated more
farmland size were less likely to engage in the usage of ICT tools by 95.7% with p-value of 0.966. In this
study, low annual income of farmers was more likely to engage in the usage of ICT tools by 62.30% (p=
0.452).
Table 5: Factors influencing farmers use of ICT tools by Binary Logistic Regression Analysis
Table 5: Factors influencing farmers use of ICT tools by Binary Logistic Regression Analysis
Variables S.E. B Exp (B) P-Value
Age .716 .150 1.162 .834
Marital status 1.380 -2.613* .073* .058
Household size .980 -.268 .765 .784
Educational level .614 2.577*** 1.315*** .000
Household headship status .790 -.106 .900 .893
Farming experience .796 -.732 .481 .358
Farmland size 1.031 -.044 .957 .966
Annual income .629 -.474 .623 .452
Constant 3.142 3.992 54.186 .204
Number of observations 100

Probability>Chi² (8) 0.00
Page 1032
Log Likelihood Ratio 55.393

Nagelkerke R² 0.753
Note: The asterisks [*, **, and ***] represent statistical significance at 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively
Source: Survey Data, 2022
n (no’ of respondents Percentage

whoused ICTs) = 51
Very
Very often Often(4) Someti Rarely Not at all Total
ICT tools Rarely
(5) mes (3) (2) used (0) %
(1)
Mobile phone 61.0% 25.0% 2.0% 2.0% 8.0% 2.0% 100%
Computer 24.0% 66.0% 2.0% 6.0% 0.0% 2.0% 100%
Radio 0.0% 25.0% 22.0% 29.0% 18.0% 6.0% 100%
Television 4.0% 6.0% 27.0% 31.0% 22.0% 10.0% 100%
Email 10.0% 27.0% 27.0% 14.0% 16.0% 6.0% 100%
Social media
24.0% 66.0% 2.0% 6.0% 0.0% 2.0% 100%
applications
Source: Survey Data, 2022
Level of ICTs usage among smallholder rice farmers
An 86% majority of respondents regularly used mobile phones for rice farming activities with 12% barely
using the ICT device. It was also discovered that only 2% of Respondents did not use mobile phones at all.
A vast majority of 75% respondents refrained from the use of Computer devices, though 8% used the device
often and from time to time, followed by an 18% minority of respondents barely using The ICT tool. Results
showed as expected that a large majority (90%) of respondents listened to Radio devices in a frequent basis
for their rice farming activities. In addition, 25% of respondents made use of Television more often than
others, followed by large majority (47%) barely using the said device. Respondents who used Electronic
mail (Email) on a frequent basis were reported to be 10%, with 27% being undecided in their responses. A
53%majority of respondents barely used email for rice farming. The frequent use of Social media
applications (such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Zoom, Skype) among respondents
were measured at 37%, followed by 27% making use of the applications once in a while and only 30% of
the respondents barely used these applications.
Table 4.7: Constraints influencing ICT usage among smallholder rice farmers
n (no’ of respondents who used ICTs) = 51

Constraints faced in the usage of ICTs Frequency Percentage (%) Rank
Language barrier 41 80.0 3rd
Poor network and reception 46 90.0 1st
Time consuming 4 8.0 7th
Expensive usage (High cost of recharge credit) 36 71.0 4th
Inadequate power supply 44 86.0 2nd
Distance to recharge centers 10 20.0 6th
High cost of ICT tools 36 71.0 5th
Source: Survey Data, 2022 (*Multiple response)

Page 1033
The constraints identified were ranked in order of severity beginning with Poor network and reception
(90%), Inadequate power supply (86%), Language barrier (80%), High cost of ICT tools (71%), Expensive
to use; High cost of recharge credit (71%), Distance to Recharge centers (20%) and Time consuming (8%).
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the conclusions of this study, the following recommendations are made:
1. It is advised that Agricultural Extension agencies take effective measures to strengthen extension
services in order to change the percentage use of ICTs by farmers with regard to the urgent need of
increasing ICT use.
2. Since the respondents’ educational background had a significant positive influence on how they used
ICTs. Thus, it might be advised that Extension agents run a number of awareness programmes,
sensitization and training workshop for the uneducated and less-educated farmers.
3. Their (farmers) use of ICTs was significantly positively impacted by their marital status. Therefore, it
might be advised that Extension agencies run more awareness campaigns about the potential
advantages of ICTs for married farmers to access essential agricultural information in collaboration
with social community-based non-governmental organizations (NGO).
4. It might be advised that the relevant Telecommunications agencies choose to invest in technical
advancements given the frequent issue of poor network connectivity to better meet the needs of
potential ICT users.
5. The goal of the current study was to examine the relationship between eight (8) chosen characteristics
of farmers and their use of ICTs. Therefore, it may be advised that additional research be conducted
while taking into account other agricultural and non-agricultural activities as well as other
characteristics of the farmers that may have an impact on how they use ICTs.
6. Age, household size, household headship status, farming knowledge, farmland size, and annual
income did not significantly influence the participants’ use of ICTs in the current study. More
research is, however, required in this regard.
Citation: Idu, E. E., Ola, I. A., Sennuga, S. O., Bamidele, J., Alabuja, F. O., Osho-Lagunju, B., Preyor, T. J.
& Iheonu, M. E. (2023). Evaluation of Factors Influencing the Use of Information and Communication
Technologies (ICTs) Among Smallholder Rice Farmers in Kuje Area council, Abuja, Nigeria
REFERENCES
1. Achukwu, G. A. Sennuga, S. O., Bamidele, J., Alabuja, F. O., Osho-Lagunju, B. & Banarbas, T. M.
(2023) Factors affecting the rate of adoption of agricultural technology among small scale rice
farmers in Gwagwalada Area Council of FCT, Nigeria, Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice, 8
(2), 30-37
2. Adeshina, K. (2021). Influence of information sources, needs and gender on information use
of science undergraduate students in University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice
(e- journal). 6313
3. Adeyemi, S. O., Sennuga, S. O., Alabuja, F, O. & Osho-Lagunju, B. (2023). Technology Usage and
Awareness among Smallholder Farmers in Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria. Direct
Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 11(3), 54-59.
4. Alaybek, B., Dalal, R. S. and Dade, B. (2022). Individual Differences in Judgment and Decision-
Making: Novel Predictors of Counterproductive Work Behavior. National library of medicine, 1-17
5. Ayeni, O. A., Sennuga, S. O., Bamidele, J., Alabuja, F. O. and Osho-Lagunju, B. (2023). ICT-Based
Market Information and Adoption of Agricultural Seed Technologies Insight from Gwagwalada Area
Council, Abuja, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 7(5), 94-105
Page 1034
6. Burns, K. E and Kho, M. E. (2015). How to assess a survey report: a guide for readers and peer
reviewers.Cmaj 187 (6), E198-E205
7. Campenhout, B. V., Spielman, D. J. and Lecoutere, E. (2020). Information and Communication
Technologies to Provide Agricultural Advice to Smallholder Farmers: Experimental Evidence from
Uganda. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103 (1): 317-337
8. Danso?Abbeam, G., Ehiakpor, D. S. and Aidoo, R. (2018). Agricultural extension and its efects on
farm productivity and income: insight from Northern Ghana. Agriculture & Food Security, 7:74
9. Dokubo, E. M., Sennuga, S. O., Bamidele, J., Omolayo, A. F., Osho-Lagunju, B., & Barnabas, T. M.
(2023). A critical review of the Nigerian inflationary factors, International Journal of Arts,
Humanities and Social Studies, 5(1), 41-47
10. Emran, S. A., Krupnik, T. J., Aravindakshan, S., Kumar, V. and Pittelkow, C. M. (2021). Factors
contributing to farm-level productivity and household income generation in coastal Bangladesh’s rice-
based farming systems. PLoS ONE 16(9): e0256694. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256694
11. Fabregas, R., Harigaya, T. and Ramrattan, R. (2022). Digital Agricultural Extension for Development.
Introduction to development engineering. 187-219
12. Fadiji, T. O. (2017). Analysis of Problems and Solution to Usage of ICT Components among
Frontline Extension Agents in Nigeria. International Journal of Research Studies in Science,
Engineering and Technology, 4(17): 10-21
13. Fassil, S. and Maria, Z. (2012). The role of information communication technology (ICT) towards
universal health coverage: the first steps of a telemedicine project in Ethiopia. Global health action, 5
(1): 15638.
14. James, W. W. (2015). Factors that determine farmers’ access and utilization of the Information and
Communication Technology provided by the department of agriculture in bahati division, Nakuru
north district, Kenya.
15. Ladele, A. A., Igodan, C. O., Agunga, R. and Fadairo, O. S. (2015). Agricultural extension in
Nigeria’s transformation agenda: key recommendations based on a field study. International Journal
of Agricultural Extension, 3(3): 173-185
16. Loevinsohn, M., Sumberg, J., Diagne, A., and Whitfield, S. (2013). Under what circumstances and
conditions does adoption of technology result in increased agricultural productivity? A Systematic
Review. Department for International Development (DFID).
17. Macire, K., Robert, O. and Christopher, C. (2016). Factors affecting the use of ICTs on agricultural
input information by farmers in developing countries. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 1(3): 315-329
18. Muhammad, H. U., Adesiji, G. B., Tyabo, I. S., Muhammed, Y., and Loko A. I. (2019). Assessment
of factors influencing the use of Information and Communication Technologies by small-scale
farmers in Federal Capital Teritory (FCT), Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Environment. 8
(4): 24-32
19. Nyarko, D. A. and Kozari, J. (2021). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) usage
among agricultural extension officers and its impact on extension delivery in Ghana. Journal of the
Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 20 (2021): 164-172
20. Omotayo, F. O. and Babalola, S. O. (2015). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among
information and communication technology artisans in Nigeria. Journal of Systems and Information
Technology
21. Palmer, K., Ciccarelli, M., Falkmer, T. and Parsons, R. (2014). Associations between exposure to
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and reported discomfort among adolescents.
Work 48 (2): 165-173
22. Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational
technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology-TOJET, 5(2), 14-23. http://tojet.net/articles/v15i12/523.pdf
23. Satish, K. and Thompson, S. T. (2012). Moderating effects of governance on information
infrastructure and e?government development. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology 63 (10), 1929-1946.
Page 1035
24. Sennuga, S.O., Conway, J. S. and Sennuga, M. A. (2020). Impact of Information And Communication
Technologies (ICTs) on agricultural productivity among smallholder farmers: evidence from sub-
saharan african communities. International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development
Studies, 7(1): 27-43
25. Sennuga, S. O. (2020). Use of ICT among smallholder farmers and extension workers and its
relevance to sustainable agricultural practices in Nigeria. A Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor
of Philosophy (PhD).
26. Toeniessen, G. Adesina, A. and De Vries, J. (2008). Building an Alliance for a Green Revolution in
Africa. The Rockefeller Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
27. William, N. (2018). Socio-economic determinants of ICT usage among rural crop farmers in the
northern region of Ghana. University for development studies
28. Wong, A. K., Chang, W. H., Ke, P. C., Huang, C. K., Tsai, T. H., Chang, H. T., Shieh, W. Y., Chan,
H. L., and Chen, C. K. (2012). Technology acceptance for an Intelligent Comprehensive Interactive
Care (ICIC) system for care of the elderly: a survey-questionnaire study. Public Library of Science 7
(8), e40591
29. Wulystan, P. M. and Ronald, B. (2013). The state of rural information and communication services in
Tanzania: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology
Research
Page 1036

ICT - Rice Farmers - Kuje

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ICT - Rice Farmers - Kuje

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ICT - Rice Farmers - Kuje

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

Evaluation of Factors Influencing the use of Information and

Keywords: Smallholder, farmers, usage, ICTs, extension, rice

Factors influencing the usage of ICT

Applications of Information and Communication Technologies

ICT as a yardstick for effective communication

ICT as a yardstick for access to improved seed varieties

ICT as a yardstick for better market linkage services

Constraints of ICTs usage among farmers

Poor Technical infrastructure

Lack of access to ICT

High cost of ICTs

Description of Study area

Sampling techniques and size

Table 1: Sampled population and farming communities

No. Farming Communities Number of farmers

Source: Field survey, 2023

Method of data collection

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Socioeconomic characteristics Frequency (n=100) Percentage (%)

Table 4: Perception of smallholder farmers towards IC usage

n (no’ of respondents who used

Source: Field survey, 2022

Factors that influences ICT usage among smallholder rice farmers

Number of observations 100

Log Likelihood Ratio 55.393

Source: Survey Data, 2022

n (no’ of respondents Percentage

Source: Survey Data, 2022

Level of ICTs usage among smallholder rice farmers

n (no’ of respondents who used ICTs) = 51

Source: Survey Data, 2022 (*Multiple response)

You might also like