Module 6 (Chapter 5
Module 6 (Chapter 5
Module 6 (Chapter 5
Module 6
TAKE ACTION
As I ask some teachers with regards to this matter, what they like about K-12
curriculum is that Filipino students stand to benefit from better-equipped teachers as the
government has lined up continuous trainings and seminars for their professional
development. More empowered school personnel and principals are now more effective, as
we advance to a technical and student-centered system of teaching and learning designed for
the students of the next millennium. Also, students are given the freedom to take on a more
hands-on role in choosing what they will learn. Compared to the traditional curriculum,
students will not be subjected to pre-chosen subjects. Instead, they will be given enough
flexibility to choose tracks and further finetune their education.
They say that while the K to 12 program in the Philippines is aimed to help improve
the quality of education in the Philippines and produce better skilled students for maximum
employability, K to 12 has also been bombarded with criticisms, mainly on the financial
ability of Filipinos to support their children through three additional years of school. Under
the current setup, two more years of school means thousands more in expenses. This has also
place excessive pressure on educators. With an educational system that does not always
provide the needs and requirements of teachers to be well equipped and well-prepared for
every class they need to teach, the K to 12 forces them to take on larger loads and higher
pressure just to deliver high-quality education to students. In addition to these K to 12
disadvantages, lesson plans and courses also need to be completely overhauled. Together
with students who would need to adjust to two additional years in school, teachers will also
need enough time to adjust to the new load that they need to bear.
ACTIVITY 2
The K to 12 program which covers Kindergarten and 12 years of basic education (six
years of primary education, four years of junior high school, and two years of senior high
school), has since met with so much public opposition. Many people still express an
unfavourable opinion on its implementation as it could aggravate the issue on education in
the country. Prior to the implementation of the program, the Philippines was one of three
countries in the world, and the only country in Asia, to have 10 years of basic education. This
was one of the driving factors why the Department of Education proposed the
implementation of K to 12. Though a lot of negative comments, criticisms, doubts and many
more pessimistic ideas nailed off in its implementation, still the Department of Education
officials continued this amendment of the educational system of our country.
If you interviewed teachers, parents and students about K to 12, what six ideas or
concepts can you tell?
Reflect on the statement below and comment: “The K to 12 is bound to fail because it is
implemented and hurriedly without thorough planning.”
K-12 will therefore unavoidably fail, not because of the curriculum but rather due to a
lack of teachers to carry out the task. Our government does not need to move quickly because
students in this day and age are already globally competitive and rely on experiential
learning, which gives us the chance to thrive. Nevertheless, we must be more patient at every
stage of the process. If your aim is just to catch up on the advancement of the curriculum
without even planning about it, it will not guarantee a good outcome. You are just sacrificing
the future of students and other young children on a thing that has not yet been planned
thoroughly. However, it doesn’t just end with planning. One of the most crucial parts is the
way we implement it. This is the part of how a curriculum is put into a real life practice. In
implementing, it needs to be aligned on what is already planned. These given scenarios are
fact that without a good to go signal will fail us all.
To sum up what I have stated, an immediate implementation will really not lead to failure
rather it is an immediate adaptation of what lies ahead of us. Change is constant and it’s
getting faster than we thought. We need to respond of such change. Thus, this curriculum
could’ve been better if there are enough resources and more skillful and competitive teachers
for an effective implementation.