Questioning Strategies
Questioning Strategies
Questioning Strategies
There are types of questions that incite student curiosity, exploration, discussion,
and higher-level thinking. There are also types of questions that invite recall of
information. Both types are valuable, but the first type tends to be underused.
If you want students to explore, discuss and think, then your instructors should
spend time learning the impacts of types of questions, and planning how to use
them effectively. How instructors see their role as educators is also key to initiating
exploration and discussion. Being an “entertainer” or “sage on the stage” has its
places in outdoor science, but it’s important to see the advantages of being a
“guide on the side,” who inspires students to explore the natural world and to
encourage talk about science ideas.
Funding from 2012-2015 for BEETLES publications such as this one has been generously provided by the S.D.
Bechtel, Jr. Foundation, The Dean Witter Foundation, and the Mary A. Crocker Trust.
© 2015 by The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. These materials may be reproduced, copied, and
distributed in their entirety for non-commercial educational purposes, but may not be sold, rented, or otherwise distributed. Neither
text nor illustrations may be modified, excerpted or republished into other material without the prior express written consent of the
copyright holder. The existing trademark and copyright notices may not be removed or obscured.
Questioning Strategies
b. WaitBEETLES™
ABOUT several minutes,
. . . . .then
. . . . ask
. . . .volunteers
. . . . . . . . .to. . share
. . . . . something
. . . . . . . . . .they
....2
heard from their partner.
OVERVIEW, MATERIALS, AND PREPARATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
c. Sum up by saying,
PPIn GUIDE
LEADER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
this session, you’ll be exploring some ideas that might help add to your 6
thinking about this question.
APPLYING SESSION TO INSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
2. HANDOUTS
Explain that scientists try to come up with the best explanations based
on all available evidence.
Broad Questions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
a. adfadfdsfasd
b. Narrow
Much of Questions
what scientists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
do can be described as trying to come up with
the best explanation based on all available evidence. This is the main
Skit #1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
practice we’ll be focusing on in this session.
Skit #2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3. Show slide; discuss NGSS quotation.
a. Skit
Allow#3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
time for participants to read. 35
b. Goals The emphasisfor
and Prompts
ummarize:
S on engaging students in Exploration.
Encouraging the key practices of.science
. . . . .is. . 37
widespread and has become the focus for current improvements to science education.
Activity Lab: Instructions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4. Share how science
Questions Andtalk
Theand argumentation
Learning are valuable to students 39
Cycle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and
recommended by NGSS and Common Core.
BFF Questions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
a. The Next Generation Science Standards and the English-Language
Arts Common
Types Core both
of Questions. . . emphasize
. . . . . . . . . .that
. . . .students
. . . . . . . .need
. . . . opportunities
. . . . . . . . . 41
to practice and develop the skills of science talk and scientific
Research on Instructor Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
argumentation.
b. Common Mistakes
Science talk withargumentation
and scientific Questioning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
are a big part of making 44 and
discussing explanations from evidence.
Background
c. Taking partInformation
in discussionsFor Presenters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
about science ideas helps students learn47 how
science works, and it also helps them become better thinkers, inquirers,
References. . . . .and
collaborators . . . .communicators.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
SESSION OVERVIEW
TEACHING ABOUT TEACHING
The presentations in this guide Activity Estimated
Questioning Strategies Locations Time
have been designed to “practice
what we preach.” This session reflects a Introducing Questioning
learner-centered approach to instruction This session starts off with partners discussing
Invitation
as participants experience a version of
an effective instructional model while
what instructors can do to encourage or
discourage exploration.
p 10 minutes
in the session. Simply telling instructors Discussing Broad and Narrow Questions
ð
Participants are introduced to two types of
about questioning goes against the
whole idea—participants will gain more
questions: broad and narrow, and they explore
how each type of question affects learners.
p 45 minutes
ð
SWant
PRESENTATION OPTION
to spend more time outdoors
than in? This whole session can be
Acting Out Instructor Roles
Three brief skits are acted out, depicting
the interactions between an instructor and
p
p
or 30 minutes
Concept Invention
{ Keep
TIMING TIP
things moving. The prompts
provided in the session are
could use more broad questions.
p
purposefully designed to generate Wrapping Up
Reflection
slide 1
2. Explain the session’s focus is on questioning that
TEACHING NOTES
leads to exploration and discussion:
Related sessions. See page 47 for a. A major goal of most outdoor science schools is to encourage students
more information on how this session to engage with and explore nature.
connects to other BEETLES Professional
Learning Sessions. b. This session will focus on how we can ask questions that directly engage
students with exploring nature, and also initiate some discussion.
How can this session support a culturally 3. Ask participants to discuss guiding question: How can an instructor
relevant approach to science instruction use questions to encourage or discourage student exploration and
in the outdoors? Good questions are at discussion?
the heart of instruction that makes room
for student voices, engages students in a. Tell partners to Turn & Talk about the guiding question.
higher level thinking, and is responsive b. W
ait a few minutes, then ask a few volunteers to share something they
to individuals within a group of students. heard from their partner. (To encourage listening, it’s important to ask
The session Questioning Strategies focuses them to share something they heard, not something they said.)
on how to use questions to encourage c. Listen to their ideas.
student dialogue, higher level thinking,
and exploration, and how to intentionally
occupy a “role” as an instructor that best 4. Explain importance of questioning strategies for discussion:
supports goals for students. a. Teaching is a language-based profession and asking productive
questions is a skill.
During the session, instructors: b. Research shows that student discussion of ideas with peers, as well as
think about when to use different types
with an educator is an important part of learning.
of questions, and how they might impact
students’ experiences c. Skillful questioning can inspire and facilitate productive educational
learn questions to encourage student discussions.
exploration like, “What do you notice,”
which can be answered by any student 5. Explain importance of questioning strategies for exploration in nature
regardless of their background knowledge and thinking:
or prior experiences
• The better an instructor is at asking questions, the more successful
reflect on how broad questions create a
they can be at:
more inclusive environment for science
discussions, where divergent thinking is • directly engaging students with the natural world
welcome and being “good at science” is • inciting students’ curiosity and wonder
not just about memorizing facts
reflect on how the different "roles" of • leading meaning-building explorations
an instructor might impact students’ • inspiring higher-level thinking
experiences • making room for student voices
discuss the benefits of thoughtfully
adopting a range of instructor roles to • being responsive to individuals
reach different goals for students
3. Hold up the second object and ask partners to describe and compare it to
the first.
a. Set down the first object where it can be easily seen by the group, and
hold up the second object.
4. Hold up the third object and ask partners to describe and compare it to
the first and second objects.
a. Set the second object down, next to the first object, and hold up the
third object.
b. Ask them to observe and describe this object,
2. Listen to responses.
a. Allow wait time, listen to their ideas and ask follow-up questions
b. Allow ~3 seconds wait time for participants to begin sharing their
thoughts and observations.
c. Their ideas may include the following:
• encouraged observations
• there was more than one acceptable response
• opened up discussion
• encouraged divergent thinking or different points of view
PPDid anyone feel more comfortable when I asked the broad questions?
TEACHING NOTES PPDid anyone feel more comfortable with the narrow questions?
Different comfort levels? A large group
PPHow did your observations of the objects change when I asked the broad vs.
narrow questions?
will often be somewhat divided on whether
they feel more comfortable with broad b. Listen to responses and ask a few follow-up questions to probe thinking.
or narrow questions. This is interesting
to point out, and is likely true for their 7. Show slide 5: Comparing Broad and Narrow
students as well. Questions. Explain some of the differences
between broad and narrow questions:
a. Broad questions can have any number of
answers.
b. That’s why they encourage students to explore, slide 5
make observations, and voice their opinions and ideas.
c. It’s also why they tend to lead to higher-level thinking.
d. Narrow questions have one specific answer, and ask for recall of
information.
e. Neither type of question should be considered “good” or “bad.”
f. They generate different types of responses and meet different types of
goals.
TEACHING NOTES 14. Bring up the following reasons, but only if participants don’t:
• Worry that broad questions lead to open-ended discussions that may
raise ideas that instructors do not understand or want to deal with.
• Instructor wants to maintain control of the conversation and thinks
Hope for the future. Although broad questions will allow students to wander off topic.
historically broad questions have been • Using mostly narrow questions to lead a briskly-paced exchange
underutilized by instructors, the Common between students and the instructor, that stays on-topic, and avoids
Core State Standards and Next Generation off-topic “distractions.”
Science Standards strongly advocate for
more student-centered, inquiry-based, • Instructors may fall back on teaching the way they were taught (often
discussion and higher level thinking- mostly narrow questions) when they feel stressed.
focused instruction. They also lessen the • Narrow questions may seem simpler and safer for students, which can
previous emphasis on recall of facts. be true if they know the answer, but for students who don’t know the
Hopefully, their influence represents answers, narrow questions can be intimidating.
significant positive shifts in instruction,
including more use of broad questions. 15. Explain that many instructors are worried about students sharing
inaccurate information, but there are strategies to deal with this:
When to correct student ideas. During
discussion, students often share accurate a. A reason many instructors are hesitant to try using more broad
ideas and information, along with questions is because they’re worried that students will bring up
inaccurate or incomplete ideas and misinformation.
information (much like many adult b. It’s useful to have ideas about what to do if that happens.
discussions). Sometimes it works fine to c. If students bring up misinformation an instructor needs to decide if it’s
correct something in the moment, but it
important enough to deal with in the moment.
can also derail discussion and discourage
students from sharing. Just telling the d. If it seems important to correct misinformation brought up by students,
correct answer may feel efficient to an instructor might:
an instructor, but does not guarantee • Add accurate information to the discussion, but usually not
that students will walk away with more immediately, to avoid embarrassment and possible withdrawal
accurate ideas. Because inaccurate ideas of the student. Add it a little later without connecting it to the
can be very persistent, learners often student’s statement.
won’t let go of them till they have had a
chance to be confronted with evidence that • Bring it up after the discussion, either with the group or with an
contradicts them, with time to discuss and individual.
process. Instructors need to decide which • Give students evidence that contradicts the misinformation—ideally
inaccuracies are worth correcting, as well through direct experience, but, if that’s not possible, then verbally
as how they can be corrected, which might or through another learning experience.
include multiple additional activities.
16. Explain that one way to deal with the challenge of learning questioning
About students discussing skills is to have some broad questions “in your back pocket” that are
misconceptions. Research shows that useful in many situations.
scientifically accurate ideas tend to come a. We know broad questions are underused, and that it can be challenging
out of discussion, even if all the individual to learn to use them well.
students had misconceptions (Smith,
b. Sometimes great questions come up spontaneously while you’re
2009; Smith, 2011). This idea is addressed
teaching. Write those down afterwards, because they are instructional
further in the BEETLES Promoting
“gold!”
Discussion Professional Learning Session.
c. But really great questions can be hard to come up with, and often take
planning.
c. These are all on a handout that includes more than those shown here
that you’ll get at the end of the session.
d. You can use this sheet when you’re planning student experiences, or as
a reminder while teaching.
e. One often overlooked type of question is on this list twice—questions
the instructor doesn’t know the answer to!
2. Explain how to participate in Walk & Talk, and pay attention to questions
asked:
a. We’ll take a look at one way to use broad questions in an activity called
Walk & Talk.
b. As you participate, remember to think meta-cognitively about the
questions and strategies I’m using.
3. Explain that the next activity models a short sequence of broad questions
used for content development and to pay attention to questions asked:
a. We’ll take a look at one brief example of how to use a sequence of
broad questions in an activity called Walk & Talk.
b. As instructors, remember as you participate, to also pay attention to
the questions and strategies I’m using.
c. The following sequence of questions are from the very beginning of a
hike on ecosystems.
d. They are meant to access students’ prior knowledge on the topic of
ecosystems, and to get them interested and thinking about it.
4. Model follow-up questions and wait time during Walk & Talk:
a. As you lead the activity, model two important questioning strategy
skills:
• Follow-Up Questions: Ask questions that probe deeper both into an
individual learner’s response and the group’s response. For example:
–– Can you explain your evidence for that?
–– Can you explain more what you mean by that?
–– Can anyone add on to what ____ is saying?
–– Would anyone care to respectfully disagree with that explanation?
• Wait time: After each question, pause for at least 3 seconds of wait
time before telling learners to start talking, either to one another or in
the whole group setting.
PPFind out as many ways as you can in which you and your partner are
connected. Music? Activities? Interests? People you know?
TEACHING NOTES c. Make sure everyone looks across and identifies their new partner, with
More about the rabbit, ecosystems, a greeting/icebreaker fist bump, high five, elbow bump, do-si-do, etc.
matter, and energy. It’s easy for
participants to get caught up in discussion 12. Repeat steps 4 through 7 with the following questions:
about the rabbit, because it may highlight
some of their own misconceptions about PPWho lives here? Look around. What organisms do you see? What organisms
matter and energy. Let the conversation do you think live here that you are not seeing?
go for a few minutes to demonstrate how
a broad question can spark curiosity, PPDiscuss as many ways as you can think of that organisms in this ecosystem
but not for so long that participants get might be connected with each other.
distracted from thinking about questioning PPThis next one’s challenging! Are you ready for it? In one year an 8 lb. rabbit
strategies. If you have staff members
may eat and drink ~ 400 lbs. of plants and water. About 140 lbs. comes out
struggling with ideas about matter and
as poop and pee. But what happens to the other 260 lbs? Hmmm.
energy (many do!), consider presenting
the BEETLES content-based professional
learning session, Ecosystems, Matter & 13. Lead a short discussion about the Walk & Talk activity
Energy with them, which also features this a. Ask,
same thought problem.
PPHow might this sequence of questions work well to start off an ecosystems
Is the Bunny Question a broad hike?
question or a narrow question? Not
all questions are easily categorized!
14. Bring up the following if your group doesn’t:
It’s broad, in the sense that there are a
variety of acceptable responses learners • The questions build on each other, starting with one that is a personal
can share, such as, sweat, lost hair, question.
bunny babies, etc. But the biggest idea • The series of questions helps students begin thinking about different
behind the question also has a correct connections that build toward understandings about ecosystems.
and incorrect response. In that sense it’s
narrow. The majority of the mass lost • The questions are also grounded in students personal experiences and
as organisms live and grow is through ideas.
exhaling gases during respiration. It is
a common misconception, even among 15. Explain that the last of those questions was an example of a challenging
science educators, that the matter turns question for some groups that pushes students to think about and reveal
into energy, which does not happen in their ideas about matter and energy:
life systems on Earth. If the instructor
a. The last question is pretty challenging for students and adults.
fixates only on this aspect, then it can
be considered a narrow question. If the b. The Bunny Question is not meant for use with all groups - only if you
instructor listens respectfully, asks follow- think your group is ready to go there.
up questions, without giving learners hints c. It tends to bring up misconceptions common among students (and
about the answers, the question works instructors!).
well to encourage divergent thinking
d. It’s meant to be used to kick off thinking and conversation about matter
and bring out student ideas. Then, it
and energy, and should be followed up with more discussion after other
works as a broad question. Although it’s
important not to correct students during experiences that challenge those misconceptions.
the discussion, it would be important to e. In a full field experience, there would be activities that support these
follow-up with a series of experiences that questions, and many more questions mixed in for students to discuss.
help students shift their understandings to
be more accurate (see BEETLES Ecosystems 16. Return inside and continue debriefing Walk & Talk:
(and Matter) Theme Hike and Card Hike
(Energy/Matter version) student activity PPWhat did you notice about Walk & Talk that set you up for success?
guide). See also the BEETLES professional a. Lead a brief discussion about what learners noticed about the Walk &
learning session Matter & Energy in Talk activity.
Ecosystems for more information.)
c. During the next activity we’ll look at some different roles instructors
often take on, and how each role influences instruction and the types of
questions asked.
TEACHING NOTES c. Some parts are reproduced verbatim, while other parts are loosely
t based on observed dialogue.
a ndou
#1-H
Skit
2. Explain that each skit represents a different role, and that they should
pay attention to role, as well as use of questions.
a. Each skit illustrates a different approach to the instructor’s role, as well
as the use of both broad and narrow questions.
b. While watching the skits, think about how the instructor views their own
role, and pay attention to the use of, and kinds of questions.
a. Either use the same volunteers or ask for five new volunteers and t
ou
and
assign them to their roles: Instructor and Student 1, 2, 3, and 4. 3-H
t#
Ski
b. Choose someone who has charismatic leader skills who you think will
be willing to “ham it up” to play the part of the Instructor in this skit.
c. Hand out Skit #3 scripts to everyone so the rest of the group can follow
along.
d. Remind volunteers to read their parts loudly.
e. Tell them to begin.
8. Lead discussion on what they noticed in Skit #3, using the same
questions.
a. Ask:
PPHow would you describe the interaction between the instructor and the Some things they may say. •engaged
students in the third skit?
students through performance •saw
PPWhat kinds of questions did the instructor ask? How did the instructor their job as dispensing knowledge to the
respond to student questions? students in a fun manner •never found
out what the students’ ideas were or
PPHow do you think the instructor saw their role as an educator? provided the students with an opportunity
to struggle with ideas or engage in higher
PPWas it student-centered? Instructor-centered? Nature-centered? level thinking •talked about exploration,
PPWas there much science learning going on? but never provided tools or opportunities
to explore •students thought the
b. Ask follow-up questions to guide the discussion and probe into presenter was cool, but probably did not
participant thinking, such as: feel that nature is cool or that they could
do science themselves.
6. Explain that being entertained can distract from observing and making
sense of the natural world.
a. A focus on entertainment can lead to student intellectual passivity.
b. This can get in the way of students developing inquiry skills to explore
and discover on their own.
c. It can be hard for students to think and process when they are
caught up watching and responding to an entertaining educational
“performance.”
d. There may be nothing wrong with students bringing home memories
of their instructor pretending to eat scat if that’s what your goal is in
the moment— but if the goal is student learning, the experience could
distract students from that goal.
Discussing the entertainer role.
Because entertainers are often rewarded
7. Ask participants for positive aspects to the entertainer role:
and encouraged in the outdoor science
a. Explain: the problem is not with being entertaining per se, but with education culture, its might be worth
instructors consistently being the center of attention during exploration discussing this role more extensively
or meaning-making activities that could be more student- and nature- with your staff. This could be a heated
centered. discussion.
b. Ask:
Some positive aspects to the
PPThere are many positive aspects of taking on an entertainer role in outdoor entertainer:
science school. What are a few you can think of? • The instructor in Skit #3 had
c. Listen to their ideas and add additional points from the sidebar if they strong engagement skills and
are not mentioned. a positive encouraging attitude
that can contribute to being an
excellent activity leader.
8. Explain how “guide on the side” instructors often lack recognition and
are pressured to take on an entertaining persona: • Chants, songs, rhymes, and
clever ways of phrasing can
a. Instructors who take on the role of the entertainer often get a lot of
be helpful for memorization.
positive reinforcement from teachers and students.
• There’s nothing wrong with
b. A less showy instructor, who acts more as a facilitator of learning, may chants, songs, and games, and
feel pressure to be more outgoing or else remain under-appreciated. having fun while learning some
c. But a skilled “guide on the side” who effectively engaging students in vocabulary.
the topic, activity, and ideas, and empowering students to explore and • Some entertainer episodes at
think for themselves deserves very positive recognition. outdoor science school can add to
the fun, flavor, and enthusiasm
of student experiences.
TEACHING NOTES 9. Explain that some instructors combine “Guide on the Side” with
“Entertainer” skills:
a. There is no need to exclusively use one of these teaching styles- like
broad and narrow questions, any of these roles can be useful in the
right situation.
b. Some instructors effectively combine the skills of the entertainer with
guide on the side.
c. Being fun and entertaining with students, coupled with an awareness of
how to set up student-centered experiences and encouraging students
to learn for themselves, can be an effective teaching style.
6. Hand out: Questions and the Learning Cycle, and BFF Questions. Explain:
a. Here are handouts that provide more scaffolding for this task.
b. The first one includes the BFF questions we talked about earlier.
TEACHING NOTES c. The second connects back to the Learning Cycle and looks at questions
Haven’t introduced the Learning Cycle one might ask to achieve the goals of each of the learning cycle phases
yet? The learning cycle is the subject (see sidebar if you haven’t addressed the learning cycle).
of the BEETLES Teaching & Learning
professional learning session. It describes 7. Ask participants to form groups of four, split into pairs, and begin.
an instructional model for teaching in a
a. Form groups of four, then split them into pairs.
way that supports how people learn. If
you haven’t done this session with your b. Allow a few minutes for pairs to talk on their own.
staff yet, you can choose to pass out the c. Spend some time listening and/or participating in the partner
handout “Questions and the Learning discussions.
Cycle” at the end of the session, or to use
d. Help out groups that may be struggling, and may need guidance.
it during the activity. If you do, just be
sure to explain that the learning cycle is
a model of teaching that is supported by 8. After ~ 30 minutes, tell everyone to return to their original group of 4 to
research. present their ideas and give feedback to one another.
strategies.
c. Asking productive questions is challenging. Some of the questions you
planned will be less productive, and others more productive.
d. A key to shifting to a more broad questions-focused practice is being
interested in what students are thinking.
e. It takes practice and perseverance. If you’re not immediately successful,
keep trying.
TEACHING NOTES
APPLYING SESSION TO INSTRUCTION
The session is not over! A critical phase of learning anything new is
application, when the learner takes new knowledge and applies it. There’s
some application included in the session, but—with all professional learning
for instructors—the rubber meets the road (or trail) when instructors apply
what they’ve learned to their instruction, and when they keep thinking and
discussing with their peers. If you want your instructors to try out “new”
activities/approaches, they’ll need ongoing support from you. Even if they’re
excited by new ideas, it’s easy for instructors, especially veteran instructors,
to keep doing what they’ve been doing already, and not try out new activities/
approaches. Some might react to content of this session as being simple,
and that they “got it,” but continue asking mostly narrow questions in their
practice without realizing it. Some are able to transition to a more broad
question-focused approach pretty naturally, but there are many who really
struggle with it, and may continue asking mostly narrow questions, or ask a
broad question, then give students hints or the “answer,” or not really listen
to student ideas. Below are a variety of follow-up activities and discussions to
dig deeper into the topic, and help you facilitate thoughtful implementation.
• Whole group staff brainstorm of what they and you can do to
encourage incorporation of broad questions and the “Guide on the
Side” role. After the session reflection, your staff will already have
written ideas about implementation into their instruction. You can tap
into these and other ideas through a group brainstorm about what they
plan to do and how you can support them in doing it.
• Discussing Implementation of questioning strategies. Assign your
staff to each try out the plan they made with students during your next
student program and write in their journals about how it went. Then
lead them in a discussion during a meeting at the end of the program.
Here’s some suggested questions to focus a reflection or discussion on:
»» Did your questions encourage exploration, thinking, discussion, and
engagement with nature?
»» What was successful about the activity?
»» What might you do differently the next time you lead it and why?
»» How did you incorporate questioning practice into students’ other
field experiences, and what ideas do you have about incorporating
it in the future?
• Instructor Observations. If you do observations of instructors, discuss
how you might incorporate elements from this session into what you
look for during the observations.
• Set aside time for your staff to read the handout, Common Mistakes
in Questioning, and to discuss it. This could work well after they have
had a chance to work on their questioning during instruction with
students.
• Continuing a discussion from the session. If there was a topic that
came up during discussion that you had to cut off, set aside some time
BROAD QUESTIONS
Broad questions (also known as “open-ended questions”):
• have no specific answer
• require higher-level thinking, exploration, observation, or an opinion
• promote discussion and divergent thinking
• open the door for authentic discussion
• tend to be underused by instructors
NARROW QUESTIONS
Narrow questions (also known as “closed-ended questions”):
• have a specific answer
• help instructor know if students know a specific piece of information.
• require recall of information.
• encourage group response and convergent thinking
• tend to be overused by instructors
SKIT #1
Scene: A group is hiking with their instructor, with student #1 at the front, when they come across a large scat in the trail.
Cast: 1 instructor and 4 students
Note: Stage directions are in parenthesis and italics
Student 1: (points at scat in the trail) Oh my God!
Instructor: Look, it’s a scat. Guess what kind of animal made this scat?
Student 2: Why is the scat hairy?
Instructor: That’s a great question! It has hair in it because it’s carnivore scat.
Student 1: Is it from a wolf?
Instructor: There used to be wolves here a long time ago, but not any more. There is an animal kind of like wolves that
lives around here – can you think of it? (Pausing for a few seconds) It starts with the letter “C.”
Student 4: Coyote?
Instructor: Maybe coyote. Maybe domestic dog.
Student 1: Dog doesn’t start with the letter “C.”
Student 2: It could be a mountain lion.
Instructor: That’s not a mountain lion scat. At least I don’t think it is.
Student 3: Cat starts with a “C.”
Instructor: It’s not a cat scat. It’s too big for a cat. Think about how big cats are. This scat is too big for a cat. So the
reason you’re seeing hair in the scat is because the animal can’t digest the hair, so it comes out in its scat.
Pointing at scat. Hey look, there are bones in there too. And of course, the dog or coyote couldn’t digest the
animals’ bones either, so there they are. The bones in there look pretty small. Guess what kind of animal that
might have been.
Student 1: A mouse?
Instructor: Yeah, I think those are mouse bones, and they’re from an unlucky mouse that got eaten by a dog of some
kind.
Student 4: A squirrel?
Instructor: No, I don’t think it’s from a squirrel. So, mountain lion scat is segmented, like it’s got different parts to it,
though they are still connected. The ends of mountain lion scat are usually blunt, not pointy. The ends on this
scat are pointy.
Student 2: I don’t get what you mean by segmented.
Instructor: Kind of like on that part there – that looks kind of segmented.
Student 2: But I thought you said it wasn’t mountain lion scat cause mountain lion scat is segmented.
Instructor: I know, well dog scat can be segmented kind of too sometimes, but cat scat is even more segmented It’s
confusing and they can be hard to tell apart sometimes. I think this is coyote or dog scat, but I may be wrong.
Student 2: Where would a dog live around here?
Instructor: If it was a domestic dog, it could live in a house nearby, like farther up this hill. But if it was a coyote, coyotes
live in burrows dug out of the ground. Coyotes are nocturnal animals, but they used to be more diurnal. But
because people hunt them sometimes, they have become more nocturnal. So this coyote probably ate the
mouse last night and then pooped it out here in the darkness.
Instructor: Now you know how to look at scat like a naturalist. OK, let’s move on. Everybody who couldn’t see very well
take a look at it as you walk by.
SKIT #2
Scene: A group is hiking with their instructor, with student #1 at the front, when they come across a large scat in the trail.
Cast: 1 instructor and 4 students
Note: Stage directions are in parenthesis and italics
Student 1: (points at scat in the trail) Oh, my God!
Instructor: Check it out! Look at the scat [Student 1] just found.
Student 2: It’s humongous!
Instructor: What do you notice about it?
Student 2: Why is the scat hairy?
Instructor: What do you mean by it being hairy?
Student 2: I mean it looks like it has hairs in it.
Instructor: Those of you who are up close, can you tell us more about whether those look like hairs?
Student 1: They look like hairs to me.
Student 2: It’s like made of hair.
Instructor: Can you describe the hairs for us? Color? Length?
Student 1: They look sort of gray.
Student 2: And twisted. It’s almost like rope. Scat rope!
Student 1: It looks like a little bone in there too.
Student 2: Yeah!
Student 3: Yeah, it does look like gray hairs and it does look rope-y.
Student 4: I see the bones too.
Instructor: Anyone have an explanation for why there are hairs in the scat? What do you all think?
Student 3: It ate a hairy animal.
Student 2: It’s a carnivore.
Student 4: Yeah, animals are meat.
Student 3: You are what you eat!
(Everyone laughs enthusiastically)
Student 1: So I guess this guy is hair and bones, cause that’s what he ate.
Instructor: If it’s a carnivore, how come there isn’t meat in the scat? How come it’s just hair and bones?
Student 1: It ate…I mean it digested the meat. But it can’t digest the hair and bones, so they come out in its poop.
Student 3 : Oooooh. Bones in your poop! Ouch!
(Everyone laughs enthusiastically)
Student 2: Maybe his name was Harry Bones.
Student 3: Hey Harry! What happened to you? Feelin’ kinda poopy today, Harry?
(Everyone laughs enthusiastically)
Instructor: Let’s try to figure out more about old Harry Bones. Judging by the bones you can see, what size animal do you
think he was?
Student 1: This looks like a little piece of a skull. It’s only about an inch long.
Student 3: Maybe it’s a mouse, or a rat.
Instructor: Can anyone think of any other animals that might live around here with a skull about that long?
Student 4: A squirrel?
Student 1: I think that a squirrel’s head is bigger than that.
Student 4: No, it’s not. Squirrels got teeny heads.
Instructor: Do you think the size of an animal’s skull would affect whether it could be eaten by another animal or not?
Student 2: Yeah, cause if it has a big skull it couldn’t fit it in its mouth.
Student 4: No, because it could eat around the head. It doesn’t have to swallow the skull whole.
Instructor: OK, it sounds like based on the size of the skull in the scat we agree that the animal that was eaten was
probably small animal with hair. What about the animal that ate it? About what size do you think it was?
Student 1: The size of a person?
Instructor: What makes you think that?
Student 1: It looks kind of like about the same size as a human scat.
Instructor: What animals around here might be that size?
Student 3: Maybe it’s smaller than a person.
Student 1: Maybe it’s a mountain lion.
Student 4: Or a wolf.
Student 2: There’s no wolves around here.
Student 4: Maybe it’s just a big dog.
Instructor: Sometimes you can get an idea about this from the shape of the scat. How would you describe its shape?
Student 1: It’s like three sort of logs.
Instructor: Can anyone add to [Student 1’s] description, and describe the shapes of those “logs” in more detail?
Student 2: They have pointy ends.
Instructor: Are all the ends pointy?
Student 2: No, that one isn’t.
Instructor: Anyone else?
Student 2: It’s like these little bumpy, lumpy logs.
Instructor: Do you all agree with that description?
All Students: Yeah.
Instructor: I read a book about scat, and it said that cat scats usually don’t have pointy ends.
Student 3: Then this isn’t mountain lion scat?
Student 4: Maybe it’s from a coyote!
Student 2: But it does have one end that isn’t pointy.
Instructor: Sometimes scat from members of the dog family has some ends that aren’t pointy. It can be hard to tell
for sure, and I’m not sure what this came from myself. But we did learn a bit about this scat through our
observations. [pause]. OK, what I want you all to do now is get a partner. And tell your partner what you think
happened between old Harry Bones and whatever ate him or her. But we’re being scientists here, so keep your
explanation based on the evidence we have. Don’t just make stuff up.
(Student 3 begins talking excitedly to student 1 while student 4 begins talking excitedly to student 2)
Student 3: I think it was a coyote. A big coyote. And it caught a mouse after waiting by its little hole till it came out. Then
he like digested it, and then when he was running’ along the trail, he was like, “I gotta go number two…”
Student 4: I think it was a coyote, because of the shape of the scat. I’m not sure what it ate, cause it seems like a mouse-
size skull, but I don’t know if coyotes would eat something as small as a mouse…
SKIT #3
Scene: A group is hiking with their instructor, with student #1 at the front, when they come across a large scat in the trail.
Cast: 1 instructor and 4 students
Note: Stage directions are in parenthesis and italics
Student 1: (points at scat in the trail) Oh, my God!
Instructor: Hey everybody!
Instructor: (singing/chanting) “It starts with an “S” and ends with a “T.” / It comes out of you and it comes out
of me./ I know what you’re thinking, and you can call it that, but let’s be scientific and call it SCAT!!!
Check it out you guys! We’ve got a humongous awesome scat here to explore. Now let me give you the
scoop on poop, because I’m a bit of a scatologist. And the first question I have for you is—is it scat of the
cat, or doo-doo of the dog?
Student 2: That’s too big to be from a cat. My cat’s poop is a lot smaller.
Instructor: I actually meant whether it’s from the dog family or the cat family. Your cat is a distant cousin of bigger
cats that might live around here: the beautiful bobcat and the magnificent mountain lion.
Student 1: Is it mountain lion scat?
Instructor: No, it’s not. Scat from the cat family is segmented and has blunt ends like a tootsie roll. Dog scat has
pointier ends. I remember it because dogs have pointier heads, and their scat has pointy ends. Cats have
more blunt heads, and their scat has blunt ends.
Student 4: My pug has a blunt head.
Instructor: Well, most dogs anyway. So what kind of dog do you think might live around here?
Student 1: A wolf?
Instructor: (makes game show buzzer sound--bzzzzt) Not a wolf. There used to be wolves around here a long time ago.
But not anymore. Sorry, try again.
Student 2: A coyote?
Instructor: Yeah! That’s absolutely right! Good job! I think this scat was left here by that infamous trickster from
native American lore—the coyote. So some people get grossed out by scat, but I think it’s totally cool!
Look, there are clues in it to tell us what it ate. Judging from the hair and bones in this scat, I can tell
that this is a carnivore, and judging from the shape, it’s a member of the dog family.
Instructor: And when animals in nature poop, they’re not just getting rid of wastes. They’re also often saying, “hey,
man, this is my territory!” So this is a little present left for us by a coyote, a little billboard along the trail
that says, “Keep out of my room!” And you know, right now you all have some of this stuff inside your
intestines. Yep, you have future scat of America, FSA, working it’s way through your tubes, right now!
(Pause while all students laugh enthusiastically)
Instructor: Your body is taking out the nutrients, and passing the wastes on down the tube. Till eventually… Well,
you know. But I hope you won’t use yours as advertising like this coyote did.
(Pause while all students laugh enthusiastically)
Instructor: But this scat won’t be here forever, because something is going to change it into dirt. Do you know what
I’m talking about?
Student 2: The FBI!
Student 1: Fungus, bacteria, and insects!
Instructor: Fungus, Bacteria, and invertebrates! You almost had it, and insects are a type of invertebrate so it’s
real easy to get those words confused. Yep, the FBI are in there right now decomposing it into dirt and
breakin’ it down. Everybody say, “break it on down!”
GOAL THREE: HELP STUDENTS CONNECT PAST IDEAS AND CURRENT EXPERIENCES
❒❒ 3. Recalling Prior Knowledge
"" “How is this the same or different from...?”
"" “Can you compare this to something else?”
Adapted from Talk Science Primer by Michaels/O’Connor, TERC 2012
❒❒ 5. Including Evidence
"" “What’s your evidence for that?”
"" “Can you show us what you mean?”
"" “What makes you think that?”
❒❒ 7. Adding on to Thinking
"" “How does that relate to what Jake said?”
"" “Can anyone add to what Keylee just said?”
"" “Can anyone put into words what they think Tanya is trying to say?”
1. In a group of 4, decide on a scenario to focus on. It should involve an object, organism, or ecosystem that each of you
commonly use or encounter in your program and that could involve more student explorations.
3. Take 2–3 minutes to write down a “normal” sequence of questions, content, or activities you’ve used or heard used
to explore this scenario in the past.
5. Identify opportunities to include more broad questions into what you have been doing.
• What specific parts of the lesson could benefit from more broad questions? What are your specific goals for those
parts?
6. Create an outline of a sequence of broad questions and narrow questions/content delivery that improves this lesson.
• You may want to significantly restructure what you initially wrote down.
8. Present your ideas and new sequence. Discuss and provide feedback.
a. How similar and different are your new sequences?
b. How are broad questions used to support exploration goals? How are they used to support content goals?
Exploration phase: Use questions to encourage students to explore new organisms, environments, processes, and events
in nature—guide students to engage in productive investigations.
• What happened when...?
• What did you discover?
• What do you think will happen if...?
• What questions do you have about…?
• What could we do to find out?
Concept Invention phase: Use questions to help students synthesize new understandings and make sense of
investigations—help students classify, categorize, quantify or order their observations—help students use evidence from
investigations to make explanations—help students draw conclusions, and make connections.
• What did you notice? What questions do you have? What are some possible explanations for that?
• What did you find out about...?
• How is this the same or different from..? Can you compare this to something else?
• What do you think is the explanation for…?
• Can you explain what makes you think that? What is your evidence?
• What might another explanation be?
Application phase: Use broad questions to encourage reasoning and analysis—involve students in authentic problem-
solving situations and critical thinking—help students to generalize their knowledge and test their hypotheses.
• What do you now know about the characteristics of...?
• What other factors do you think might be involved?
• Can you find a way to...?
• What does it remind you of?
• How can we use what we found out to solve a problem?
• How could you be more sure about…?
Reflection phase: Use questions to encourage students to think back on what they have done and how they have made
sense of what they have explored.
• What surprised you?
• How did you arrive at your solution or conclusion?
• Did you change any of your initial thinking?
• What caused you to see things differently?
• How did you figure out…?
BFF QUESTIONS
Questions that will be your Best Friends Forever to
encourage wonder, exploration, discussion, and reflection.
Invitation Questions
• What have you heard about ________?
• Describe an experience you’ve had with ________?
Exploration Questions
• What do you notice?
• What do you wonder?
• What does it remind you of?
• How might you explain this?
• How is that similar/different than ______?
and...
• Any question you (the instructor) don’t already know the answer to!
Discussion Questions
• What makes you think that?
• Can you say more about that?
• What’s your evidence?
• How can you be more sure?
• Do you agree/disagree with what ______ just said?
and...
• Any question you don’t already know the answer to!
Reflection Questions
• What helped you to learn?
• What surprised you?
• Did any of your ideas change during this activity?
• What made your ideas change?
• How might you explain or show some of what you learned in this activity to a family member?
• What questions do you still have about _____?
Note: Some of these categories match up nicely with phases of the Learning Cycle (addressed in the BEETLES Teaching &
Learning professional learning session). The Learning Cycle phases are: Invitation, Exploration, Concept Invention, Appli-
cation, and Reflection. BFF questions are questions that can be used in many contexts, but Concept Invention and Appli-
cation questions tend to be too topic-specific for a list such as this. See Broad Questions handout for examples of specific
concept invention and application questions Discussion questions can be used in any phase when there’s discussion
going on, including Concept Invention.
TYPES OF QUESTIONS
Sage on Stage. Educators who see themselves as expert bearers of information and understanding, whose role is to fill
students’ heads with the correct information and facts.
Entertainer. Educators who see themselves as making learning fun, primarily responsible for raising enthusiasm and
encouraging excitement about science, by providing an engaging persona and entertaining “bits” for students.
Making Students feel “led by the nose” by “broad” questions with an agenda
Sometimes questions that sound broad are really narrow, because they are asked with a specific answer in mind.
An instructor’s responses to students’ answers can show that they were looking for a particular answer, so it’s not
really a broad question.
Example of a “broad” question with an agenda:
Instructor: What do you think might have made those holes in the wood?
Student: I think it was a bird.
Student: I think it was an insect
Instructor: What’s an insect about the same size as those holes?
Student: Maybe beetles?
Instructor: Bingo!
For the students, these questions serve as narrow questions, and the experience becomes one of “guess what’s in
the instructor’s head.” Students quickly figure out that the instructor is actually looking for a specific answer, and
students will probably stop participating if they don’t know the answer.
A different approach: If the instructor had used accepting responses and follow-up questions, like, “what makes you
think that?” it would’ve been a truly broad question, and would’ve led to exploration, thinking, and the instructor
learning more about what is going on in students’ heads. Exploration and discussion can feel fake to students if
they feel the instructor is trying to pull them towards certain ideas and get them to “guess what’s in my head.” If it
feels like a sincere broad question, and students don’t sense an agenda, more will participate and share more diver-
gent thinking. If you want students to know something specific, it’s often better to just tell it to them, rather than to
ask them a narrow question and have them guess till they say the answer you wanted them to say.
Instructor: Yep, and blue whales are the biggest animal to ever live on Earth.
One way to tell that the question is narrow and it’s not a real discussion is when the instructor starts giving stu-
dents hints at the answer they’re hoping for.
A different approach: To start discussion or exploration, use broad questions and accepting responses. Broad ques-
tions (for example, “what do you think is the most successful organism on Earth?”) have multiple possible answers,
and that makes them interesting to think about and discuss.
comparisons or quantify their observations. Given adequate experience and exploration of a topic or phenomenon,
students may then be ready to draw conclusions and make sense of their investigations, responding to questions,
such as: “What do you think is the explanation for...?” or “Why do you think this happened?” can be used to
encourage sense-making. Questions can be used to challenge students to apply what they’ve learned in order
to generalize their knowledge or test their ideas, such as: “how do you think the ecosystem might be affected if
sharks were gone?” Asking students to reflect on their thinking—“how have your ideas changed, and what evidence
made them change?”—and investigation processes help them become more aware of their own strengths and
weaknesses in the subject area, and encourages them to take charge of their own learning.
REFERENCES
Albergaria-Almeida, P. (2010). Classroom questioning: teachers’ perceptions and practices. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 2(2), 305–309.
Albergaria-Almeida, P. (2010). Questioning patterns and teaching strategies in secondary education. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 751–756.
Almeida, P., de Jesus, H. P., & Watts, M. (2008). Developing a mini-project: Students’ questions and learning styles.
Psychology of Education Review, 32(1), 6.
Borko, H. & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to Teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology.
New York: Macmillan, Simon & Schuster, pp. 673–708.
Bromley, K .D. (1992). Language Arts: Exploring Connections. 2nd Edition. Boston, Allyn & Bacon.
Cecil, N. L. (1995). The Art of Inquiry: Questioning Strategies for K–6 Classrooms. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, Peguis Publishers.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in
science education, 44(1), 1-39.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: Case studies in science classrooms.
The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19 (2), 230–284.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during
collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883–908.
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking Their Way Into Science: Hearing Children’s Questions and Theories, Responding with Curriculum. New
York, Teacher’s College Press.
Goodwin S, et al. (1989). Planning questions, in Classroom Communication: Collected Readings for Effective Discussion and
Questioning. Madison, Wisconsin, Magna Publications, pp. 91–93.
Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the
questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524.
Harlen, W. (2014). The Teaching Of Science in Primary Schools, 6th Edition. New York, Routledge.
Jacobs, V. R., Martin, H. A., Ambrose, R. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2014). Warning Signs!. Teaching Children Mathematics, 21(2),
107-113.
Laws, J. M. (2016). The Laws Guide to Nature Drawing and Journaling. Berkeley, CA: Heyday.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, Learning and Values. Norwood, Ablex Publishing.
Levin, T., & Long, R. (1981). Effective Instruction. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 225 North
Washington Street, Alexandria, VA 22314
Lowery, L. (2002). The Nature of Inquiry. Science Technology and Children. Washington, DC, National Research Council.
Lowery, L. (2010). Investigative Questions are the Sparks that Ignite Inquiry. Science and Children, Arlington, VA, National
Science Teachers Association.
Lowery, L. & Marshall, H. (1980). Learning About Instruction: Teacher-Initiated Verbal Directions and Eliciting Questions.
Educational Research and Applications Program, University of California, Berkeley.
Michaels, S. & O’Connor, C. (2012). Talk Science Primer. TERC: Cambridge, Mass.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of
research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan, pp. 127–146.
Tienken, C., Goldberg, S., & DiRocco, D. (2009). Questioning the Questions. Kappa Delta Pi Record.
Wilen, W. W., (Ed.) (1987). Questions, Questioning Techniques, and Effective Teaching, Washington, DC, National Education
Association.\