Chapter 10
Chapter 10
- Gestalt psychologists argue that consciousness tends to be organized into a coherent whole or
Gestalt
- The figure above is a bi-stable figure; you either see an old lady or a young woman looking
over her shoulder → you only see one figure at a time not both
- Gestalt switch: a sudden change in the way information is organized
- Gestalt switches can occur verbally as well;
- E.g Swimming under a bridge came two ducks in front of two ducks, two ducks behind
two ducks, and two ducks in the middle. How many ducks were there in all?
- If you’re like most people your answer is six, your organized the duck this way:
O O
O O
O O
- The phrase two duck makes you think of pair but suppose you were told they are
swimming in a single file, your answer might be four;
O
O
O
O
- Insight problem: a problem that we must look at from a diff angle before we can see how to
solve it
- An insight problem typically gives us all the information we need to solve it: no
additional information is required but we may have to look at it from a diff way
- The area to be painted gold is bounded by two parallel vertical lines tangent to the circle and
equal in length to the diameter of the circle. These lines are joined by semicircles. To figure out
how much paint is required, you need to know the size of the area inside the lines but outside the
window.
- Wertheimer described several attempts to solve this problem:
- Adult participants interpreted the problem in terms of what they had learned from similar
problems in the past.
- Some of them felt certain that they could solve such an apparently simple problem.
- they attempted to apply solution procedures blindly, without any real conception of what
the problem required.
- it was easy for them to find the area of the window itself because they already knew the
formula for finding the area of a circle.
- Children participants w/ not math skills → reaction to the problem to say they dont
know how to solve it
- Then he looks at the figure for a moment and realizes that the two top and bottom
semicircles fit inside the window.
- Thus the area required is simply the area of a square with sides the same size as the
diameter of the circle.
- Productive thinking (Wertheimer): thinking based on a grasp of the general principles that
apply in the situation at hand
- Structurally blind / reproductive thinking: the tendency to use familiar or routine procedures,
reproducing thinking that was appropriate for other situations, but is not appropriate for the
current situation
- In order to think productively, you need to go beyond having a little knowledge that you can
misapply: you need to look at the situation with fresh eyes in order to recognize and apply the
general principles that are relevant to it
- It requires you to connect all the dots with four straight lines without lifting your pencil
from the paper (the solution is given in the second part of the figure).
- Even with the hint, however, many participants still did not solve the problem.
- “The Gestalt view holds that once fixation is broken, the solution either appears whole in
a flash of insight or is produced smoothly as one step leads to another”
- Hint (maier’s view): a hint must be consistent w/ the direction that the person’s thinking is
taking, and cannot be useful unless it responds to a difficulty that the person has already
experienced.
Insight is involuntary
- Feeling of warmth: the feeling that many people have as they approach solution to a problem (i.e
getting warm)
- solution. This is because non-insight problems are solved step-by-step, and with each
step they feel they are “getting warmer.”
- with insight problems participants should not feel that they are getting warmer until the
solution actually appears; thus the feeling-of-warmth with insight problems should stay
more or less level until the solution is reached, at which time it should rise dramatically.
- Feeling of knowing: the feeling that you will be able to solve a particular problem
- participants were asked to rank in order the set of problems they would be working on,
from those they thought would be the easiest to handle to those they thought they might
not be able to solve.
- For non-insight problems, participants were able to predict fairly accurately which ones
they would be able to solve and which ones they would not.
- Einstellung effect (Luchins): the tendency to respond inflexibly to a particular type of problems;
also called a rigid set
- In the Luchinses’ experiments, participants were given a series of water jar problems just
like the two we have considered.
- All of them could be solved using the same formula: B minus A minus 2C.
- After solving five problems using that formula, participants had developed a rigid set, or
Einstellung effect.
- a set facilitates some responses while inhibiting others.
- A, B, and C have capacities of 23, 49, and 3 litres, respectively, and the required amount
is 20 litres.
- Woltz, Gardner, and Bell (2000) tested the generality of the Luchinses’ findings using a version
of the number reduction task
- Recall that number reduction problems have two rules, a same rule and a different rule.
- the three numbers were always 1, 2, and 3, and the given string was four numbers long
(e.g., 3213).
- Participants were trained on number sequences that required them to follow the same
sequence of rules over and over.
- For example, they might be asked to solve problems in which the rules had to be applied
in the sequence same–different–same or different–same–different.
- They were then tested on problems that required the use of new rule sequences, such as
same–different–different or different–same–same.
- Those participants who had the most practice during training showed the greatest
negative transfer when tested with problems requiring a new rule sequence.
- Negative transfer: the tendency to respond w/ previously learned rule sequence
even when they are inappropriate
- they kept responding with previously learned rule sequences and their
performance levels dropped as a result.
- Woltz relate their study to other research into common errors made in everyday life.
- The Einstellung effect resembles the kinds of errors we all make when we have
overlearned a particular routine and continue to follow it when we should do something
new.
- Strong but wrong: overlearned and response sequences that we follow even when we
intend to do something else
Flexibility-rigidity and the brain
- Recall that the prefrontal areas of the brain are thought to provide “a top-down bias that favours
the selection of task-relevant information.
- Recall that the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been singled out as playing a
particularly important role in selecting between alternative response tendencies.
- Recall on memory systems, we reviewed evidence suggesting that the left DLPFC should be seen
as an integral part of working memory, monitoring and controlling alternative courses of action.
- Colvin, Dunbar, and Grafman (2000) have extended this picture of the role of the left DLPFC in a
study of water jar problems done with patients with prefrontal lesions.
- Solving water jar problems requires a counterintuitive move—one that appears to take the
solver farther away from the goal rather than closer to it.
- Both frontal lobe lesion patients and normal controls were given water jar problems.
- The patients solved fewer problems than the controls, and also made fewer
counterintuitive moves.
Mindlessness
- Mindfulness vs mindlessness (langer): openness to alt possibilities vs the tendency to behave as
if the situation had only one possible interpretation
- People who are experiencing Einstellung effects behave mindlessly in assuming that
there is only one way to interpret a situation.
- to behave mindfully means to actively seek new possibilities.
- Langer and Piper reasoned that one way of preventing the development of mindlessness is to
encourage people to think about things in a tentative rather than absolute way.
- For example, describing objects in terms that allowed participants to see that they could have
alternative uses might encourage mindfulness, whereas describing them in terms of single uses
might not.
- Langer and Piper did an experiment in which participants were shown three objects: a dog’s
rubber chew toy, a polygraph pen, and a hairdryer attachment.
- For half the participants, the objects were described unconditionally as one thing only, as
in, “This is a dog’s chew toy.”
- For the other half of the participants, the objects were described conditionally, as in,
“This could be a dog’s chew toy.”
- The experimenter then pretended to need an eraser and asked participants what to do.
- A mindful response would have been to suggest that the chew toy could be used as an
eraser.
- If the chew toy had been described conditionally, then participants were much more
likely to make the mindful response than when it had been described unconditionally.
- One player tries to place five Xs in a line, while the other tries to place five Os in a line.
- the person playing Xs is in an unstoppable position → No matter where the person
playing Os moves, X will win on the following move → this situation is called an
open four
- Meanwhile, the person playing Os has created a situation called an open three.
- If you can create two open threes, then you will be in a better position, because if your
opponent blocks one of them you can turn the other into an open four on your next move.
- There are various subgoals
- Subgoal: a goal drive from the original goal, the solution of which leads to the
solution of the problem as a whole
- If you were writing a computer program to play Go-Moku against an opponent, what
sorts of characteristics would your program need to have?
- First it would need a data structure and an evaluation function
- Evaluation function: the process whereby a plan is created, carried out, and
evaluated
- It consists of a representation of the playing board and the possible states of each
position on the board, whether X, O, or empty.
- The evaluation function handles all the elements that Polya referred to as
“creating a plan, carrying out the plan and evaluating the plan
- Means-end analysis: the procedure used by general problem solver to reduce differences
between current and goal states
- In order for the problem-solving process to advance, subgoals may have to be substituted
for the original goal.
- For example, if there is no action that would follow from the current condition and lead
directly to the goal, there may be a subgoal that can be reached directly from the current
state.
- Goal stack: the final goal to be reached is on the bottom of the stack, with the subgoals piled on
top of it in the reverse of the order in which they are to be attained
- By contrast, in retrospective verbalization the participant is asked about cognitive processes that
occurred at an earlier point in time.
- Concurrent verbalization relies on short-term memory, whereas retrospective verbalization relies
on long-term memory.
- When participants think aloud, they put into words a process that normally takes place non-
verbally.
- This verbal description of the solution process is called a protocol.
Programming Insight
- Kaplan and Simon (1990) showed that even a very difficult insight problem can be analyzed in
terms compatible with an artificial intelligence approach.
- The problem they focused on is called the mutilated checkerboard problem
- There is a standard 8-by-8 checkerboard, from which two corners have been removed.
Historical accounts
- Cognitive history of science: the study of historically important scientific discoveries in a
framework provided by cognitive science
- A landmark in cognitive historical studies was Gruber’s reconstruction of the process by which
Darwin arrived at his theory of evolution through natural selection.
- Scientists are often meticulous record-keepers, and this was especially true of Darwin. His
notebooks trace the development of his ideas over more than 50 years. Gruber observed that
Darwin’s enterprise illustrated the strength of the Zeigarnik effect: the “quasi-need” to finish
incomplete tasks
Unexpected findings
- Unexpected findings: although scientists may initially resist info that disconfirms favoured
hypotheses, successful
- Although scientists may initially resist information that disconfirms favoured hypotheses,
successful problem-solvers don’t persist in trying to confirm their original hypotheses: instead,
they set themselves a new goal of explaining the unexpected findings.
Distributed reasoning
- Distributed reasoning: reasoning done by more than one person
Computational models
- BACON: A computer program that has been able to “discover” several well known scientific
laws
- For example, it searches for patterns in the relationships between two variables, such as
whether they increase together, or one increases while the other decreases. BACON has
“discovered” several well-known scientific laws.
- Among them was Kepler’s third law of planetary motion, which expresses the relationship
between the length of time it takes a planet to orbit the sun and the distance of that planet from
the sun.
- Face validity: methods that clearly measure what they are supposed to measure are said to be
“face valid”