Ce 311 Modules Module Lectures
Ce 311 Modules Module Lectures
CE 311
STRUCTURAL THEORY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Module 1
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
Before structural analysis takes its course, its preliminary aspects are necessary to be
realized. Such process, emanating from the theory of structures is discussed in order to
recognize the types of structures, their components, supports and loadings. Considering these
elements will pave way for an appropriate analysis and design.
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
1. Planning Phase
This phase usually involves the establishment of the functional requirements
of the proposed structure, the general layout and dimensions of the structure,
considerations of the possible types of structures that may be feasible and the types
of materials to be used. Non-structural factors such as aesthetics, environmental
impact are also considered in this phase. The outcome of this phase is usually a
structural system that meets the functional requirements.
3. Estimation of Loads
This phase determines all the loads that are expected and anticipated to act on
the structure.
4. Structural Analysis
This phase carries out the values of the loads. Analysis of the loads determine
the stresses, shear forces, moments, and deflections at various points of the structure.
Tension Structures
Compression Structures
Trusses
Shear Structures
Bending Structures
Dead Loads
Dead load consist of the weights of the various structural members and the weights
of any objects that are permanently attached to the structure. Hence, for a building, the dead
loads include the weights of the columns, beams, and girders, the floor slab, roofing, walls,
windows, plumbing, electrical fixtures, and other miscellaneous attachments.
Example 1.
Live Loads
Live loads can vary both in their magnitude and location. They may be caused by the
weights of objects temporarily placed on a structure, moving vehicles, or natural forces.
Wind Loads
When the speed of the wind is very high, it can cause massive damage to a structure.
The reason is that the pressure created by the wind is proportional to the square of the wind
speed.
Earthquake Loads
Earthquakes produce lateral loadings on a structure through the structure’s
interaction with the ground. The magnitude of an earthquake load depends on the amount
and type of ground accelerations and the mass and stiffness of the structure.
Impact Loads
When live loads are applied rapidly to a structure, they cause larger stresses than those
that would be produced if the same loads would have been applied gradually. The dynamic
effect of the load that causes this increase in stress in the structure is referred to as impact.
Snow Loads
In many parts of the United States and the world, snow loads must be considered in
designing structures. The design snow load for a structure is based on the ground snow load
for its geographical location, which can be obtained from building codes or meteorological
data for that region.
Exercise. The floor system of a gymnasium consists of a 130-mm-thick concrete slab resting
on four steel beams (A = 9,100 mm2) that, in turn, are supported by two steel girders (A =
25,600
mm2), as shown in the figure below. Determine the dead loads acting on beam BF and girder
AD.
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
Quiz 1
I. Identification
___________________________ 1. These loads have constant magnitudes and fixed
positions, and they act permanently on the structure.
___________________________ 2. These loads have varying magnitudes and/or positions
and are caused by the use or occupancy of the structure.
___________________________ 3. These loads are due to seismic forces.
___________________________ 4. These loads are due to wind pressures.
___________________________ 5. It is the science and art of planning, designing, and
constructing safe and economical structures that will serve their intended purposes.
9. References
Module 2
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
In this chapter we will focus to the most common form of structure that the engineer
will have to analyze, and that is one that lies in a plane and is subjected to a force system
that lies in the same plane. Discussion of the importance of choosing an appropriate analytical
model for a structure so that the forces in the structure may be determined with reasonable
accuracy. Thus, the criteria necessary for structural stability are discussed for the analysis of
statically determinate, planar, pin-connected structures.
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
In your statics, you learned that a structure or one of its members is in equilibrium
when it maintains a balance of force and moment. In general this requires that the force
and moment equations of equilibrium be satisfied along three independent axes, namely,
The principal load-carrying portions of most structures, however, lie in a single plane,
and since the loads are also coplanar, the above requirements for equilibrium reduce to,
10
The equilibrium equations provide both the necessary and sufficient conditions for
equilibrium. When all the forces in a structure can be determined strictly from these equations,
the structure is referred to as statically determinate. Structures having more unknown
forces than available equilibrium equations are called statically indeterminate. As a general
rule, a structure can be identified as being either statically determinate or statically
indeterminate by drawing free-body diagrams of all its members, or selective parts of its
members, and then comparing the total number of unknown reactive force and moment
components with the total number of available equilibrium equations.
Occasionally, connections are used in structures that permit not only relative rotations
of the member ends but also relative translations in certain directions of the ends of the
connected members. These translations are modeled as internal roller joints and/or internal
hinged, in which one equation or reaction is given by internal hinged and two for internal
roller joints. Thus,
where, ie – indeterminacy
ec – reaction given by internal hinged or internal roller joint
For frames, ie = r – 3n
where, ie – indeterminacy
r – no. of reaction
n – no. of free-body diagram
11
ie = r – (3 + ec)
= 3 – (3+0)
ie = 0
Thus, the structure is
statically determinate
externally
ie = r – (3 + ec)
= 5 – (3+0)
ie = 2
Thus, the structure is
statically indeterminate
externally to the second
degree
ie = r – (3 + ec)
= 6 – (3+2)
ie = 2
Thus, the structure is
statically indeterminate
externally to the first
degree
ie = 6 – (3 + ec)
= 5 – (3+2)
ie = 0
Thus, the structure is
statically determinate
externally
ie = r – 3n
= 9 – 3(2)
ie = 3
Thus, the structure is
statically indeterminate
externally to the 3rd
degree
12
ie = 18 – 3n
= 18 – 3(3)
ie = 9
Thus, the structure is
statically indeterminate
externally to the 9th
degree
ie = (b+r) – 2j
= (18 + 3) - 2(10)
ie = 1
Thus, the structure is
statically indeterminate
externally to the 1st
degree
ie = (b+r) – 2j
= (11 + 8) - 2(7)
ie = 5
Thus, the structure is
statically indeterminate
externally to the 5th
degree
2.3 Reaction
The following procedure provides a method for determining the joint reactions for
structures:
Free-Body Diagrams
• Disassemble the structure and draw a free-body diagram of each member. Also, it
may be convenient to supplement a member free-body diagram with a free-body diagram of
the entire structure. Some or all of the support reactions can then be determined using this
diagram.
• Recall that reactive forces common to two members act with equal magnitudes but
opposite directions on the respective free-body diagrams of the members.
• All two-force members should be identified. These members, regardless of their
shape, have no external loads on them, and therefore their free-body diagrams are
represented with equal but opposite collinear forces acting on their ends.
• In many cases it is possible to tell by inspection the proper arrowhead sense of
direction of an unknown force or couple moment; however, if this seems difficult, the
directional sense can be assumed.
Equations of Equilibrium
13
• Count the total number of unknowns to make sure that an equivalent number of
equilibrium equations can be written for solution. Except for two-force members, recall that
in general three equilibrium equations can be written for each member.
• Many times, the solution for the unknowns will be straightforward if the moment
equation is applied about a point (O) that lies at the intersection of the lines of action of as
many unknown forces as possible.
• When applying the force equations and orient the x and y axes along lines that will
provide the simplest reduction of the forces into their x and y components.
• If the solution of the equilibrium equations yields a negative magnitude for an
unknown force or couple moment, it indicates that its arrowhead sense of direction is
opposite to that which was assumed on the free-body diagram.
14
15
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
16
a.
b.
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
Quiz
I. Classify and determine the indeterminacy
17
18
II.
9. References
19
Module 3
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
In this chapter, we will analyze statically determinate trusses using the method of
joints and the method of sections. The determinacy and stability of a truss will be discussed.
Then the analysis of three forms of planar trusses will be considered: simple, compound, and
complex. Finally, at the end of the chapter we will consider the analysis of a space truss.
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
Plane trusses are commonly used for supporting decks of bridges and roofs of
buildings. The roof is attached to the purlins, which transmit the roof load (weight of the roof
plus any other load due to snow, wind, etc.) as well as their own weight to the supporting
trusses at the joints. Because this applied loading acts on each truss in its own plane, the
trusses can be treated as plane trusses.
20
21
22
Example
23
24
25
Example
26
The method of joints, presented in the preceding section, proves to be very efficient
when forces in all the members of a truss are to be determined. However, if the forces in only
certain members of a truss are desired, the method of joints may not prove to be efficient,
because it may involve calculation of forces in several other members of the truss before a
joint is reached that can be analyzed for a desired member force. The method of sections
27
enables us to determine forces in the specific members of trusses directly, without first
calculating many unnecessary member forces, as may be required by the method of joints.
The method of sections involves cutting the truss into two portions by passing an
imaginary section through the members whose forces are desired. The desired member forces
are then determined by considering the equilibrium of one of the two portions of the truss.
Each portion of the truss is treated as a rigid body in equilibrium, under the action of any
applied loads and reactions and the forces in the members that have been cut by the section.
The unknown member forces are determined by applying the three equations of equilibrium
to one of the two portions of the truss. There are only three equilibrium equations available,
so they cannot be used to determine more than three unknown forces. Thus, in general,
sections should be chosen that do not pass through more than three members with unknown
forces. In some trusses, the arrangement of members may be such that by using sections
that pass through more than three members with unknown forces, we can determine one or,
at most, two unknown forces. Such sections are, however, employed in the analysis of only
certain types of trusses.
Example
28
29
30
31
32
33
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
Quiz
References
34
Module 4
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
Structures, like all other physical bodies, deform and change shape when subjected
to forces. Other common causes of deformations of structures include temperature changes
and support settlements. If the deformations disappear and the structure regains its original
shape when the actions causing the deformations are removed, the deformations are
termed elastic deformations. The permanent deformations of structures are referred to as
inelastic, or plastic, deformations. In this chapter, we will focus our attention on linear
elastic deformations. Such deformations vary linearly with applied loads.
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
The direct integration method essentially involves writing the expression for M=EI
(bending moment divided by flexural rigidity of the beam) in terms of the distance x along the
axis of the beam and integrating this expression successively to obtain equations for the slope
and deflection of the elastic curve. The constants of integration are determined from the
boundary conditions. The direct integration method proves to be most convenient for
computing slopes and deflections of beams for which M=EI can be expressed as a single
continuous function of x over the entire length of the beam. However, the application of the
method to structures for which the M=EI function is not continuous can become quite
complicated. This problem occurs because each discontinuity, due to a change in loading
and/or the flexural rigidity (EI), introduces two additional constants of integration in the
analysis, which must be evaluated by applying the conditions of continuity of the elastic curve,
a process that can be quite tedious. The difficulty can, however, be circumvented, and the
analysis can be somewhat simplified by employing the singularity functions defined in most
textbooks on mechanics of materials.
Example 1
35
36
Example 2
37
The slope or deflection at any point on the beam is equal to the resultant of the slopes
or deflection at that point caused by each of the load acting separately.
38
39
40
41
42
43
Example 1
44
Example 2
45
46
The moment-area method for computing slopes and deflections of beams was
developed by Charles E. Greene in 1873. The method is based on two theorems, called the
moment-area theorems, relating the geometry of the elastic curve of a beam to its M=EI
diagram, which is constructed by dividing the ordinates of the bending moment diagram by
the flexural rigidity EI. This method is more convenient to use for beams with loading
discontinuities and the variable EI, as compared to the direct integration method described
previously.
In order to apply the moment-area theorems to compute the slopes and deflections
of a beam, it is necessary to draw a qualitative deflected shape of the beam using its
bending moment diagram. In this regard, recall that a positive bending moment bends the
beam concave upward, whereas a negative bending moment bends it concave downward.
Also, at a fixed support, both the slope and the deflection of the beam must be zero;
therefore, the tangent to the elastic curve at this point is in the direction of the undeformed
axis, whereas at a hinged or a roller support, the deflection is zero, but the slope may not
be zero.
To facilitate the computation of areas and moments of areas of the M=EI diagrams,
the formulas for the areas and centroids of common geometric shapes must be noted.
Instead of adopting a formal sign convention, it is common practice to use an intuitive
approach in solving problems using the moment-area method. In this approach, the slopes
and deflections at the various points are assumed to be positive in the directions shown on
the sketch of the deflected shape or elastic curve of the structure.
Any area of the M=EI diagram that tends to increase the quantity under
consideration is considered to be positive and vice versa. A positive answer for a slope or
deflection indicates that the sense of that quantity as assumed on the elastic curve is
correct. Conversely, a negative answer indicates that the correct sense is opposite to that
initially assumed on the elastic curve.
In applying the moment-area theorems, it is important to realize that these theorems
in general do not directly provide the slope and deflection at a point with respect to the
undeformed axis of the beam (which are usually of practical interest); instead, they provide
the slope and deflection of a point relative to the tangent to the elastic curve at another
point. Therefore, before the slope or deflection at an arbitrary point on the beam can be
computed, a point must be identified where the slope of the tangent to the elastic curve is
either initially known or can be determined by using the support conditions. Once this
reference tangent has been established, the slope and deflection at any point on the beam
can be computed by applying the moment-area theorems.
47
In cantilever beams, since the slope of the tangent to the elastic curve at the fixed
support is zero, this tangent can be used as the reference tangent. In the case of beams for
which a tangent with zero slope cannot be located by inspection, it is usually convenient to
use the tangent at one of the supports as the reference tangent. The slope of this reference
tangent can be determined by using the conditions of zero deflections at the reference
support and an adjacent support.
The magnitudes of the slopes and deflections of structures are usually very small, so
from a computational viewpoint it is usually convenient to determine the solution in terms of
EI and then substitute the numerical values of E and I at the final stage of the analysis to
obtain the numerical magnitudes of the slopes and deflections. When the moment of inertia
varies along the length of a beam, it is convenient to express the moments of inertia of the
various segments of the beam in terms of a single reference moment of inertia, which is
then carried symbolically through the analysis.
Example
48
49
Example
50
51
The application of the moment-area method involves computation of the areas and
moments of areas of various portions of the M=EI diagram. When a beam is subjected to
different types of loads, such as a combination of distributed and concentrated loads,
determination of the properties of the resultant M=EI diagram, due to the combined effect of
all the loads, can become a formidable task. This difficulty can be avoided by constructing the
bending moment diagram in parts—that is, constructing a separate bending moment diagram
for each of the loads. The ordinates of the bending moment diagrams thus obtained are then
divided by EI to obtain the M=EI diagrams. These diagrams usually consist of simple geometric
shapes, so their areas and moments of areas can be easily computed. The required areas and
moments of areas of the resultant M=EI diagram are then obtained by algebraically adding
(superimposing) the corresponding areas and moments of areas, respectively, of the bending
moment diagrams for the individual loads. Two procedures are commonly used for
constructing bending moment diagrams by parts. The first procedure simply involves applying
52
each of the loads separately on the beam and constructing the corresponding bending
moment diagrams. Consider, for example, a beam subjected to a combination of a uniformly
distributed load and a concentrated load, as shown in Fig. 6.9(a). To construct the bending
moment diagram by parts, we apply the two types of loads separately on the beam, as shown
in Fig. 6.9(b) and (c), and draw the corresponding bending moment diagrams. It is usually
convenient to draw the parts of the bending moment diagram together, as shown in Fig.
6.9(d). Although it is not necessary for the application of the moment-area and conjugate-
beam methods, if so desired, the resultant bending moment diagram, as shown in Fig. 6.9(a),
can be obtained by superimposing the two parts shown in Fig. 6.9(b) and (c).
53
54
Example
55
Example
56
The conjugate-beam method is based on the analogy between the relationships among
load, shear, and bending moment and the relationships among M=EI, slope, and deflection.
The slope and deflection can be determined from M=EI by the same operations as those
performed to compute shear and bending moment, respectively, from the load. Furthermore,
if the M=EI diagram for a beam is applied as the load on a fictitious analogous beam, then
the shear and bending moment at any point on the fictitious beam will be equal to the slope
and deflection, respectively, at the corresponding point on the original real beam. The fictitious
beam is referred to as the conjugate beam, and it is defined as follows:
A conjugate beam corresponding to a real beam is a fictitious beam of the same length
as the real beam, but it is externally supported and internally connected such that if the
conjugate beam is loaded with the M=EI diagram of the real beam, the shear and bending
moment at any point on the conjugate beam are equal, respectively, to the slope and
deflection at the corresponding point on the real beam.
External supports and internal connections for conjugate beams are determined from the
analogous relationships between conjugate beams and the corresponding real beams; that is,
57
the shear and bending moment at any point on the conjugate beam must be consistent with
the slope and deflection at that point on the real beam. The conjugate counterparts of the
various types of real supports thus determined are shown in the figure below. As this figure
indicates, a hinged or a roller support at an end of the real beam remains the same in the
conjugate beam. This is because at such a support there may be slope, but no deflection, of
the real beam. Therefore, at the corresponding end of the conjugate beam there must be
shear but no bending moment; and a hinged or a roller support at that end would satisfy
these conditions. Since at a fixed support of the real beam there is neither slope nor deflection,
both shear and bending moment at that end of the conjugate beam must be zero; therefore,
the conjugate of a fixed real support is a free end, as shown in the figure below. Conversely,
a free end of a real beam becomes a fixed support in the conjugate beam because there may
be slope as well as deflection at that end of the real beam; therefore, the conjugate beam must
develop both shear and bending moment at that point. At an interior support of a real beam
there is no deflection, but the slope is continuous
(i.e., there is no abrupt change of slope from one side of the support to the other), so the
corresponding point on the conjugate beam becomes an internal hinge at which the bending
moment is zero and the shear is continuous. Finally, at an internal hinge in the real beam
there may be deflection as well as discontinuous slope of the real beam. Therefore, the
conjugate beam must have bending moment and abrupt change of shear at that point.
Because an interior support satisfies both of these requirements, an internal hinge in the real
beam becomes an interior support in the conjugate beam, as shown in the figure below.
The conjugates of some common types of (real) beams are depicted in the succeeding
figure indicates, the conjugate beams corresponding to statically determinate real beams are
always statically determinate, whereas statically indeterminate beams have unstable
conjugate
beams.
However,
since these
unstable
conjugate
beams will be
loaded with
the M=EI
diagrams of
statically
indeterminate
real beams,
which are self-
balancing, the
unstable
conjugate
beams will be
in equilibrium.
Sign Convention
If the positive ordinates of the M=EI diagram are applied to the conjugate beam as
upward loads (in the positive y direction) and vice versa, then a positive shear in the conjugate
beam denotes a positive (counterclockwise) slope of the real beam with respect to the
undeformed axis of the real beam; also, a positive bending moment in the conjugate beam
58
denotes a positive (upward or in the positive y direction) deflection of the real beam with
respect to the undeformed axis of the real beam and vice versa.
7. The deflection at a point on the real beam with respect to the undeformed axis of the real
beam is equal to the bending moment at that point on the conjugate beam. A positive
59
bending moment in the conjugate beam denotes a positive or upward deflection of the real
beam and vice versa.
Example
Determine the slopes and deflections at points B and C of the cantilever beam shown
by Conjugate-beam Method.
Solution
Deflection at B The deflection at B on the real beam is equal to the bending moment
at B in the conjugate beam.
Using the free body of the conjugate beam to the left of B and considering the
clockwise moments of the external forces about B as positive, in accordance with the beam
sign convention, we compute the bending moment at B on the conjugate beam as
60
Example
Solution
This beam was previously analyzed in the moment-area method. The M/EI diagram
by cantilever parts with respect to point B is shown in figure (b) and Conjugate Beam in
figure (c).
61
62
63
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
64
Module 5
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
To develop the expression of the virtual work method that can be used to determine
the deflections of trusses, consider an arbitrary statically determinate truss, as shown in Fig.
7.4(a). Let us assume that we want to determine the vertical deflection, D, at joint B of the
truss due to the given external loads P1 and P2. The truss is statically determinate, so the
axial forces in its members can be determined from the method of joints described
previously. If F represents the axial force in an arbitrary member j (e.g., member CD in Fig.
7.4(a)) of the truss, then (from mechanics of materials) the axial deformation, d, of this
member is given by
65
Example
66
Influence Lines
Influence lines have important application for the design of structures that resist large
live loads. In this chapter we will discuss how to draw the influence line for a statically
determinate structure. The theory is applied to structures subjected to a distributed load or a
series of concentrated forces, and specific applications to floor girders and bridge trusses are
given.
67
68
69
2.
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
70
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
71
9. References
72
Module 6
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
73
74
75
Example 1
76
77
Example 2
78
Example 3
79
2. In example no. 2, extend a 4 ft overhang to the right of R3 with 400 lbs concentrated
load at its edge
a. Determine M2 and M3
b. Determine R1, R2 and R3
c. Draw V & M diagram
80
3. In example no. 3, extend a 4 ft overhang to the left of R 1 with with 400 lbs
concentrated load and replace support at R3 with a fixed support
a. Determine M1, M2 and M3
b. Determine R1, R2 and R3
c. Draw V & M diagram
Examples in Mathalino.com
National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015
Structural Analysis by Besavilla
Structural Analysis, Fifth Edition by Aslam Kassimali
Elementary Structural Analysis, Third Edition by Norris, Wilbur, Utku
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
9. References
81
Module 7
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
This chapter presents the Slope Deflection Method for beams, basically to solve the
moments and reactions at supports of indeterminate beams, specifically, continuous beams.
The method takes into account only the bending deformations of structures. Although the
slope-deflection method is itself considered to be a useful tool for analyzing indeterminate
beams and frames, an understanding of the fundamentals of this method is regarded as a
basis in some computer software in structural analysis.
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
The slope-deflection method was originally developed by Heinrich Manderla and Otto
Mohr for the purpose of studying secondary stresses in trusses. Later, in 1915, G. A. Maney
developed a refined version of this technique and applied it to the analysis of indeterminate
beams and framed structures.
When a continuous beam or a frame is subjected to external loads, internal moments
generally develop at the ends of its individual members. The slope-deflection equations
relate the moments at the ends of a member to the rotations and displacements of its ends
and the external loads applied to the member.
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
1. In example no. 1 in your Module 1, replace the support at R1 with a fixed support
a. Determine M1 and M2 by Slope-Deflection Method
b. Determine R1, R2 and R3
c. Draw V & M diagram
95
2. In example no. 2 in your Module 1, extend a 4 ft overhang to the right of R3 with 400
lbs concentrated load at its edge
a. Determine M2 and M3 by Slope-Deflection Method
b. Determine R1, R2 and R3
c. Draw V & M diagram
3. In example no. 3 in your Module 1, extend a 4 ft overhang to the left of R 1 with with
400 lbs concentrated load and replace support at R3 with a fixed support
a. Determine M1, M2 and M3 by Slope-Deflection Method
b. Determine R1, R2 and R3
c. Draw V & M diagram
Examples in Mathalino.com
National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015
Structural Analysis by Besavilla
Structural Analysis, Fifth Edition by Aslam Kassimali
Elementary Structural Analysis, Third Edition by Norris, Wilbur, Utku
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, essay activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
96
9. References
97
Module 8
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
The method of analyzing beams and frames using moment distribution was
developed by Hardy Cross, in 1930. At the time this method was first published it attracted
immediate attention, and it has been recognized as one of the most notable advances in
structural analysis
during the twentieth century.
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
Example 1
106
107
Example 2
108
a. In example no. 1, replace the support at A with a fixed support, then solve for the
final moments using Moment Distribution Method
109
b. In example no. 2, replace support A with a hinged support, then solve for the final
moments using Moment Distribution Method.
Examples in Mathalino.com
Structural Analysis by Besavilla
Structural Analysis, Fifth Edition by Aslam Kassimali
Elementary Structural Analysis, Third Edition by Norris, Wilbur, Utku
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
9. References
110
Module 9
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
2. Introduction
Analysis of frames without sidesway are similar with analysis of continuos beams. In
the analysis of frames with sidesway, with consider a restrained acting against and to the
direction of sway.
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
121
9. References
122
Module 10
CE 311 – STRUCTURAL THEORY
Chapter 10 – Lateral Loads on Building Frames: Portal Method and Cantilever Method
2. Introduction
In this chapter, we will solve frames using Portal Method and Cantilever Method.
Both frames solve the shear in the column and girder, and as well as the moment in the
column and girder. The shear and moment arrive with this method, is the basis for the
design of reinforced concrete or steel frames.
3. Learning Outcomes
4. Learning Content
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
In the example, replace the lateral forces with 50 kN, 70 kN and 90 kN, respectively.
a. Solve by Portal Method
b. Solve by Cantilever Method
142
Online (synchronous)
TelEducation moodle, Facebook messenger, Zoom, Google Classroom, etc..
Remote (asynchronous)
module, problem set, activities, etc…
8. Assessment Tank
9. References
143
144