Scribd
Upload
26 views2 pages

Notes Algebraic Expressions

This document provides notes on important concepts in calculus including: 1. The difference of two squares formula and how it can be used to rationalize denominators. 2. Continued fractions, which are expressions with reciprocals in the denominators that repeat, potentially infinitely. Finite continued fractions can approximate irrational numbers. 3. A proof that expressions of the form a±√b are irrational if b is a natural number that is not a perfect square.

Uploaded by

m.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
26 views2 pages

Notes Algebraic Expressions

This document provides notes on important concepts in calculus including: 1. The difference of two squares formula and how it can be used to rationalize denominators. 2. Continued fractions, which are expressions with reciprocals in the denominators that repeat, potentially infinitely. Finite continued fractions can approximate irrational numbers. 3. A proof that expressions of the form a±√b are irrational if b is a natural number that is not a perfect square.

Uploaded by

m.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

The University of Sydney

MOOC Introduction to Calculus

Notes for 'Algebraic expressions, surds and approximations'

Important Ideas and Useful Facts:


(i) Differences of two squares formula: In any well-behaved arithmetic we have the identity
a2 − b2 = (a + b)(a − b) .
known as the difference of two squares formula. It is exploited, for example, in the next
important idea (rationalising the denominator).
√
(ii) Rationalising the denominator: If a ∈ Z, b ∈ N and a ± b ̸= 0 then
( )( √ ) √
1 1 a∓ b a∓ b
√ = √ √ = 2 . ( IMP )
a± b a± b a∓ b a − b2
For example,
( )( √ ) √ √
1 1 1− 5 1− 5 5−1
√ = √ √ = = ,
1+ 5 1+ 5 1− 5 1−5 4 The exp. is divided and
multiplied by the
denominator but with the
and ( )( √ ) √ √ opposite sign
1 1 3+ 7 3+ 7 3+ 7
√ = √ √ = = .
3− 7 3− 7 3+ 7 9−7 2
It is a fact, discussed
√ below, that if a ∈ Z and b ∈ N, such that b is not a perfect
square, then a ± b is irrational. The terminology rationalising the denominator comes
about, as in the examples above, where the original fraction has an irrational number
in the denominator. The fraction is then transformed by this technique, so that the
denominator becomes rational (an integer, in fact, in each of these examples).
(iii) Continued fractions: An expression obtained by taking a number and adding a recipro-
cal, where the denominator itself is another expression involving a number added to a
reciprocal, and allowing this process to repeat, is called a continued fraction.
If the entire expression is just a reciprocal, but the denominator can be expressed sym-
bolically in terms of the entire expression, then the expression can be fed into itself
indefinitely, to obtain an infinite continued fraction. For example, the expression
1
X =
1+X Value of X keeps on entering the denominator

leads to the infinite continued fraction


1
X =
1
1+
1
1+
1
1+
1+.
..
By truncating such an expression at some place, one obtains a finite continued fraction,
which then evaluates to an ordinary fraction.

1
Examples and proofs:

1. Consider the infinite continued fraction mentioned above:


1
X =
1
1+
1
1+
1
1+
1+.
..

If we replace the three dots in the above expression by zero, we get the following finite
continued fraction Y , which is a rough approximation to X:
1
X ≈ Y =
1
1+
1
1+
1
1+
1+0
We can evaluate Y by evaluating the expression “inside-out” as follows:
1 1 1
Y = = =
1 1 1
1+ 1+ 1+
1 1 1 3/2
1+ 1+ 1+
1 1 1+1 2 2
1+
1+0
1 1 1 3
= = = = .
1 2 5/3 5
1+ 1+ 5/3
3/2 3

It is indeed a fact, by no means obvious, that X represents a real number (the reciprocal of
the golden ratio, explored in a future video). To see that this expression can be evaluated
in a sensible way involves the theory of limits, introduced in Module 3. The proof that
there is convergence to the reciprocal of the golden ratio, or indeed any real number at all,
is an advanced argument involving the theory of convergent sequences, which is beyond
the scope of this course.
√
2. We explain why α = a + b is irrational if a is any integer and √ b is a natural number that
is not a perfect square. We mentioned in earlier notes that b is irrational.
m
Suppose, by way of contradiction, that α is rational, say α = n
where m and n are
integers. Then √ m
a+ b = ,
n
so that √ m m − an
b = −a = .
n n
√
But this expression on the right is a ratio of two integers, m − an and n, expressing b
( which is irrational ) as a fraction, which is impossible. Hence α is irrational.
√
An almost identical argument shows that a − b is also irrational.

You might also like