Design and Analysis of Gravity Dam - A Case Study Analysis Using Staad Pro 1
Design and Analysis of Gravity Dam - A Case Study Analysis Using Staad Pro 1
away the loose overburden till firm rock is 3. Exceptional loads are designed on the
encountered which is considered as the basis of limited general applicability or
actual foundation. Nevertheless not all having low probability of occurrence like
rocks are of the same quality; they vary inertial loads associated with seismic
with different geological materials and the activity.
process by which they have been formed Technically a concrete gravity dam derives
over the years. For example, the hills of its stability from the force of gravity of the
the Himalayan range of the mountains are materials in the section and hence the
considered geologically young, as well as name. The gravity dam has sufficient
weaker than the massif of the Deccan weight so as to withstand the forces and
plateau. The quality of foundation not only the overturning moment caused by the
affects the design, it also guides the type of water impounded in the reservoir behind it.
dam that would be suited at a design site. It transfers the loads to the foundations by
Hence, discussions on the ground cantilever action and hence good
foundation aspects have been introduced in foundations are pre requisite for the
this lesson as well. gravity dam.
Design of concrete gravity Dam sections The forces that give stability to the dam
Fundamentally a gravity dam should include:
satisfy the following criteria: 1. Weight of the dam
1. It shall be safe against overturning at 2. Thrust of the tail water
any horizontal position within the dam at The forces that try to destabilize the dam
the contact with the foundation or within include:
the foundation. 1. Reservoir water pressure
2. It should be safe against sliding at any 2. Uplift
horizontal plane within the dam, at the 3. Forces due to waves in the reservoir
contact with the foundation or along any 4. Ice pressure
geological feature within the foundation. 5. Temperature stresses
3. The section should be so proportional 6. Silt pressure
that the allowable stresses in both the 7. Seismic forces
concrete and the foundation should not 8. Wind pressure
exceed. The forces to be resisted by a gravity dam
Safety of the dam structure is to be fall into two categories as given below:
checked against possible loadings, which 1. Forces, such as weight of the dam and
may be classified as primary, secondary or water pressure which are directly
exceptional. The classification is made in calculated from the unit weight of
terms of the applicability and/or for the materials and properties of fluid pressure
relative importance of the load. and
1. Primary loads are identified as 2. Forces such as uplift, earthquake loads,
universally applicable and of prime silt pressure and ice pressure which are
importance of the load. assumed only on the basis of assumptions
2. Secondary loads are generally of varying degree of reliability. In fact to
discretionary and of lesser magnitude like evaluate this category of forces, special
sediment load or thermal stresses due to care has to be taken and reliance placed on
mass concreting. available data, experience and judgement.
Objectives
ANVESHANA’S INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES
EMAIL ID: [email protected] , WEBSITE: www.anveshanaindia.com
29
AIJREAS VOLUME 2, ISSUE 4 (2017, APRIL) (ISSN-2455-6300) ONLINE
ANVESHANA’S INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES
Job Information
Engineer Checked
Approved
Date: 07-Apr-17
Figure 4.3 shows the piping geometry
Structure Type SPACE FRAME
2) The dam without openings the [11] IS 6512” (1984), Bureau of Indian
maximum stresses are concentrating near Standards, New Delhi , India.
u/s face ranges from 0.59 N/mm2 to 0.977 [12] Small dams - Guidelines for Design,
N/mm2. Construction and Monitoring", (2002)
3) Dam with openings, Maximum stress French Committee On Large Dams Comité
concentrated around the openings are 4.13 Fançais Des Grands Barrages.
N/mm2. [13] v.SohelAhmedQuadri,
4) So far earthquake forces static loading MangulkarMadhuri N, “Investigation of
is given as per the STAAD.Pro definitions critical angle of incidence for the analysis
and command and not manually, however of RCC frames”, International Journal of
dynamic analysis is not considered in this Advances in Science Engineering and
paper. Technology, ISSN 2321-9009, Volume-2,
5) There are some uncertainties still Issue-3, July 2014.
prevailing regarding stability at support [14]SohelAhmedQuadri,
conditions. MangulkarMadhuri N, “Investigation of
critical direction of seismic force for the
References analysis of RCC frames”, International
[1] Karuna Moy Ghosh,”Analysis and Journal of Civil Engineering and
Design Practice of Hydraulic Concrete Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976-6308,
Structure” PHI Learning Private Limited Volume 5, Issue 6, Hune 2014.
[2] US Army Corps of Engineers, “ [15]. Hatami, K. (2001); Seismic Analysis
Gravity Dam Design” EM 1110-2-2200 30 of Concrete Dams, National Defence,
June 1995 Royal Military College of Canada,
[3] Bentley, “ STAAD.Pro” www.zworks.com/seismic
www.bentley.com/en- analysis/concrete dams/ Seismic Analysis
US/Products/STAAD.Pro of Concrete Dams.
[4] “Practice for Galleries and different [16]. Iroko, A. O. (2001); Hysterical
Openings in Dam, Bureau of Indian Analysis of Strawbale as an Infill Material
Standards, New Delhi. Subjected to Seismic Loadings
[5] IS 12966 (Part 2) -1990, “Practice for (Vibration), B. Eng. Project, Submitted to
Galleries and different Openings in Dam, the Dept. of Civil Engineering, University
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. of Ilorin, Ilorin.
[6] IS 6512 -1984, “Criteria for style of [18]. Lotfi, V. (2001); Seismic Analysis of
Solid Gravity Dam, Bureau of Indian Concrete Gravity Dams using Decoupled
Standards, New Delhi. Modal Approach in Time Domain,
[7]IS 1893 (Part 1) -2002, “Criteria for Electronic Journal Of Structural
Earthquake Resistant style of Structures, Engineering, Vol. 3, www.ejse.org, pp 102
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. – 116.
[8] Design Criteria for Concrete Arch and
Gravity Dams" (1977), USBR, EM No.19
[9] "Gravity Dam Design", (30 June 1995),
US Army Corps of Engineers, EM 1110-2-
2200.
[10] “IS 1893” (1984), Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi, India
ANVESHANA’S INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES
EMAIL ID: [email protected] , WEBSITE: www.anveshanaindia.com
38