Scribd
Upload
73 views5 pages

Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Task 5 - Review

This document provides instructions for a task evaluating students' knowledge of English phonetics. It consists of three steps: 1) Creating a Genially presentation identifying consonant sounds, diphthongs, and prosodic features. 2) Writing a 350-word reflection comparing phonetics and phonology, addressing differences, importance, and whether these topics should be taught early. 3) Submitting a final PDF following APA style, including references. Students will be evaluated on the quality of their Genially presentation, reflection, and final document based on criteria addressing completeness, accuracy, analysis, organization, and originality.

Uploaded by

Fernanda Sanchez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
73 views5 pages

Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Task 5 - Review

This document provides instructions for a task evaluating students' knowledge of English phonetics. It consists of three steps: 1) Creating a Genially presentation identifying consonant sounds, diphthongs, and prosodic features. 2) Writing a 350-word reflection comparing phonetics and phonology, addressing differences, importance, and whether these topics should be taught early. 3) Submitting a final PDF following APA style, including references. Students will be evaluated on the quality of their Genially presentation, reflection, and final document based on criteria addressing completeness, accuracy, analysis, organization, and originality.

Uploaded by

Fernanda Sanchez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


Course: English Phonetics 518014

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Task 5 – Review

1. Activity Description

Type of activity: Individual


Evaluation moment: Final
Highest score of the activity: 125 points
The activity starts on: Monday, The activity ends on: Sunday, December
November 28, 2022 11, 2022
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:
Identify the segmental and suprasegmental characteristics that are involved in
English sound production.

The activity consists of:

Step 1:
design a presentation, using Genially where you have to add the following items:
-Choose five consonant sounds, and name the manner, place of articulation, and
articulators involved in their sound production. Also, you have to tell if this is voiced
or voiceless. Also, give two examples of words per consonant sound. Finally, add
images to show the articulation of the sounds.
-Choose two diphthongs and create a diagram where you have to mark the
movement of those sounds.
-Define what is a content word and give two examples.
-Define what is a function word and give two examples.
-Define falling intonation and write two sentences as examples.
-Define raising intonation and write two sentences as examples.

Step 2:
Write a reflection establishing a comparative relation between phonetics and
phonology, this reflection must be written following the next specifications:
-Use a least 350 words.
-Use APA style for citations and references.
-Explain the differences and similarities between phonetics and phonology.

1
-The importance of knowing about the segmental and suprasegmental features of
English.
-Answer the following question: Do you think is it important to teach phonetics and
phonology in the early stages of the learning process?

Step 3:
The final document must be organized according to the APA style. Also, you have to
include bibliographic references. Finally, when you submit the final document in the
Evaluation environment, it will be sent automatically to Turnitin, where you will see
the percentage of reliability of your text.
For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must:


- Check the Course Agenda to organize your time.
- Check all available forums.
- Verify the dates of the Web Conferences so that you can plan your participation
accordingly.
- Verify your tutors’ synchronous attention by Skype.

In the Learning Environment, you must:


- Check the Course Contents and Bibliographic References for Units 1 and 2
- Download the Syllabus of the course to actively read.
- Go to the discussion forum for the task and get familiar with your collaborative
group.
- Participate in the forum to get feedback from e-mates and tutors.

In the Evaluation Environment, you must:


Upload a PDF file with the task’s individual evidence. Identify your file as follows:
518014 - Task 5 - Your Full Name.pdf

Evidences of individual work:


The individual evidence to be submitted is:

A PDF file named 518014 - Task 5 – Your Full Name.pdf with the following pages
1. Cover page
2. Presentation in Genially
3. Reflection
4. APA References (Different from the ones provided in the course if you use other
sources of information for your answers)

2
Evidences of collaborative work:
No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Individual evidence, consider the following

Students must deliver one PDF document, with a link to the Genially presentation
and reflection.
• Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:


a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3
3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Individual


Evaluation moment: Final
The highest score in this activity is 125 points
First evaluation High level: The student designs the presentation including all
criterion: the specifications of the activity guide, and also shows a good
understanding of the segmental and suprasegmental features.
Students design the Finally, the examples and definitions are clear enough.
Genially
presentation having If your work is at this level, you can get between 40 points
into account the and 60 points
activity guide and
rubric specification Average level: The student designs the presentation, but the
items required are not complete, also his knowledge about the
This criterion segmental and suprasegmental features is not well accurate.
represents 60 Finally, the examples and the definitions are not clear enough.
points of the total
of 125 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
the activity. and 39 points

Low level: There is no presentation or the presentation does


not have the elements required for this task.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points


and 19 points
Second evaluation High level: The student writes the reflection according to the
criterion: specifications of the activity guide and rubric, showing a deep
analysis and reflection on the difference between Spanish and
Write a reflection on English sounds. Finally, the student answers the questions by
the differences and citing the readings of the course.
similarities between
Spanish and English If your work is at this level, you can get between 34 points
sounds. and 50 points

This criterion Average level: The student writes the reflection, but it does not
represents 50 meet all the requirements of the activity guide and rubric, there
points of the total is little analysis of the difference between Spanish and English
sounds. Finally, there are not enough bibliographic cites.
4
of 125 points of
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 17 points
and 33 points

Low level: The reflection does not meet any specification of the
requirements of the activity guide and rubric, or the student
does not write any reflection.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0


points and 16 points
Third evaluation High level: The final document is well organized, and
criterion: accomplishes the APA rules, as well as the bibliographic
references. The percentage of similarity in Turnitin is low.
Present the final If your work is at this level, you can get between 11 points
document taking and 15 points
into account APA
standards, and Average level: The final document is not well organized and
originality of the references are not according to the APA rules. The
Turnitin. percentage of similarity in Turnitin is medium.

This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 6 points
represents 15 and 10 points
points of the total
of 125 points of Low level: The document does not have bibliographic
the activity. references, and the percentage of similarity in Turnitin is very
high.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points


and 5 points

You might also like