CP 9
CP 9
Reporting financial
performance
Introduction
Learning outcomes
Chapter study guidance
Learning topics
1 IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements
2 IFRS 8, Operating Segments
3 IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued
Operations
4 IAS 24, Related Party Disclosures
5 IFRS 1, First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards
6 IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting
7 IFRS 14, Regulatory Deferral Accounts
8 Audit focus – general issues with reporting performance
9 Audit focus – specific issues
Summary
Self-test questions
Further question practice
Technical reference
Answers to Interactive questions
Answers to Self-test questions
Introduction
Learning outcomes
• Explain how different methods of recognising and measuring assets and liabilities can affect
reported financial performance
• Explain and appraise accounting standards that relate to reporting performance: in respect of
presentation of financial statements; revenue; operating segments; continuing and discontinued
operations; EPS; interim reporting
• Formulate and evaluate accounting and reporting policies for single entities and groups of
varying sizes and in a variety of industries
• Calculate and disclose, from financial and other qualitative data, the amounts to be included in an
entity’s financial statements according to legal requirements, applicable financial reporting
standards and accounting and reporting policies
• Appraise the significance of inconsistencies and omissions in reported information in evaluating
performance
• Compare the performance and position of different entities allowing for inconsistencies in the
recognition and measurement criteria in the financial statement information provided
• Make adjustments to reported earnings in order to determine underlying earnings and compare
the performance of an entity over time
• Demonstrate and explain, in the application of audit procedures, how relevant ISAs affect audit
risk and the evaluation of audit evidence
Specific syllabus references for this chapter are: 2(a)–(d), 9(f)–(h), 14(f)
9
3 IFRS 5, Non-current Approach Both assets held for IQ2: Held for sale
Assets Held for Sale You have studied sale and This question asks
and Discontinued this topic at discontinued you to apply the
Operations Professional Level, operations are held-for-sale criteria.
External users of so work through regularly tested, Make sure you
financial statements quickly then do the both in the single come to a
rely on the limited interactive question. silo FR question and conclusion.
disaggregation the integrated
Stop and think question. Scenarios
provided as a result
of the requirements How do standards are often very
of accounting such as IFRS 5 and detailed and IFRS 5
standards such as IFRS 8 help provide will interact with
the disclosure of disaggregated other standards,
discontinued information to such as IAS 10.
operations. users?
Once you have worked through this guidance you are ready to attempt the further question practice
included at the end of this chapter.
• IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements sets down the format of financial statements,
containing requirements as to their presentation, structure and content.
IAS 1
This Practice Statement is an example of where two professional skills interact. In order to apply
judgement, you need to identify the relevant information, taking into account IFRS requirements and
users’ information needs.
Having assimilated and organised the information (steps 1 to 3 of the Practice Statement process),
you will be in a position to make judgements about whether it is material. Other information may be
needed to support the judgements.
20X7 20X6
$m $m
Revenue X X
Cost of sales (X) (X)
Gross profit X X
Other income X X
Distribution costs (X) (X)
Administrative expenses (X) (X)
Other expenses (X) (X)
Finance costs (X) (X)
Share of profit of associates X X
Profit before tax X X
Income tax expense (X) (X)
Profit for the year from continuing operations X X
Loss for the year from discontinued operations (X)
PROFIT FOR THE YEAR X X
Other comprehensive income:
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:
Gains on property revaluation IAS-16 X X
Investment in equity instruments IFRS-9 (X) X
Actuarial gains (losses) on defined benefit pension plans IAS-19 (X) X
Share of gain (loss) on property revaluation of associates X (X)
Income tax relating to items that will not be reclassified X (X)
(X) X
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations IAS-21 X X
Cash flow hedges IFRS-9 (X) (X)
Income tax relating to items that may be reclassified (X) (X)
X X
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax (X) X
Alternatively, components of OCI could be presented in the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income net of tax.
Retained
earnings
foreign ops
Inv. in equity
instrum’ts
Cash flow
hedges
Revaluat’n
surplus
Total
Non-controlling
interest
Total equity
Trans. of
Balance at £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
1 Jan 20X7 X X (X) X X – X X X
Changes in
accounting
policy – X – – – – X – X
Retained
earnings
foreign ops
Inv. in equity
instrum’ts
Cash flow
hedges
Revaluat’n
surplus
Total
Non-controlling
interest
Total equity
Trans. of
Balance at £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Restated
balance X X (X) X X – X X X
Changes in
equity
during
20X7
Issue of
share
capital X – – – – – X – X
Dividends – (X) – – – – (X) (X) (X)
Total
compre-
hensive
income for
the year – X X X X X X X X
Transfer to
retained
earnings – X – – – (X) – – –
Balance at
31 Dec
20X7 X X X X X X X X X
A comparative statement for the prior period is also required. Here is an example of a statement of
changes in equity with some real figures in, to give you a better idea of what it looks like:
Olive Group: statement of changes in equity for the year ended 30 June 20X9
Inv. in Non-
Share Retained equity Revaluat’n controlling Total
capital earnings instrum’ts surplus Total interest equity
£m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Balance at
1 July 20X8 14,280 10,896 384 96 25,656 1,272 26,928
Share
capital
issued 1,320 1,320 1,320
Dividends (216) (216) (120) (336)
Total
compre-
hensive
income for
the year (1,296) 72 48 (1,176) 528 (648)
Balance at
30 June
20X9 15,600 9,384 456 144 25,584 1,680 27,264
An important aspect of reporting financial performance is segment reporting. This is covered by IFRS
8, Operating Segments.
IFRS 8 is a disclosure standard.
• Segment reporting is necessary for a better understanding and assessment of:
– past performance;
– risks and returns; and
– informed judgements.
• IFRS 8 adopts the managerial approach to identifying segments.
• The standard gives guidance on how segments should be identified and what information
should be disclosed for each.
It also sets out requirements for related disclosures about products and services, geographical areas
and major customers.
2.1 Introduction
Large entities produce a wide range of products and services, often in several different countries.
Further information on how the overall results of entities are made up from each of these product or
geographical areas will help the users of the financial statements. This is the reason for segment
reporting.
• The entity’s past performance will be better understood.
• The entity’s risks and returns may be better assessed.
• More informed judgements may be made about the entity as a whole.
Risks and returns of a diversified, multinational company can be better assessed by looking at the
individual risks and rewards attached to groups of products or services or in different geographical
areas. These are subject to differing rates of profitability, opportunities for growth, future prospects
and risks.
Definition
Operating segment: This is a component of an entity:
• that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses (including
revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same entity);
• whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief operating decision maker to
make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance; and
• for which discrete financial information is available.
2.4 Aggregation
Two or more operating segments may be aggregated if the segments have similar economic
characteristics, and the segments are similar in all of the following respects:
• The nature of the products or services
• The nature of the production process
• The type or class of customer for their products or services
• The methods used to distribute their products or provide their services
• If applicable, the nature of the regulatory environment
IFRS 8 provides a framework for structuring the problem of comparing like with like and identifying
important areas of the business. First segments need to be identified – not always easy in real life or
in the exam. Then the relevant disclosures need to be made.
2.6 Disclosures
2.6.1 Segment disclosures
Disclosures required by the IFRS are extensive and best learned by looking at the example and pro
forma, which follow the list. Disclosure is required of:
• Factors used to identify the entity’s reportable segments
A reconciliation of each of the above material items to the entity’s reported figures is required.
Reporting of a measure of profit or loss by segment is compulsory. Other items are disclosed if
included in the figures reviewed by or regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker.
Notes
1 External revenue is allocated based on the customer’s location.
2 Non-current assets exclude financial instruments, deferred tax assets, post-employment benefit
assets, and rights under insurance contracts.
• Information about reliance on major customers (ie, those who represent more than 10% of
external revenue)
• ‘All other’ segment results are attributable to four operating segments of the company which do
not meet the quantitative thresholds. Those segments include a small property business, an
electronics equipment rental business, a software consulting practice and a warehouse leasing
operation. None of those segments has ever met any of the quantitative thresholds for
determining reportable segments.
• The finance segment derives a majority of its revenue from interest. Management primarily relies
on net interest revenue, not the gross revenue and expense amounts, in managing that segment.
Therefore, as permitted by IFRS 8, only the net amount is disclosed.
Country of Foreign
domicile countries Total
Revenue – external customers X X X
Non-current assets X X X
Segment
External Internal Total profit/ Segment Segment
revenue revenue revenue (loss) assets liabilities
£m £m £m £m £m £m
Chemicals:
Europe 14 7 21 1 31 14
Requirement
Which of the operating segments of Endeavour constitute a ‘reportable’ operating segment under
IFRS 8, Operating Segments for the year ending 31 December 20X5?
IFRS 5 requires assets and groups of assets that are ‘held for sale’ to be presented separately on the
face of the statement of financial position and the results of discontinued operations to be presented
separately in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. This is required so that
users of financial statements will be better able to make projections about the financial position,
profits and cash flows of the entity based on continuing operations only.
Definition
Disposal group: A group of assets to be disposed of, by sale or otherwise, together as a group in a
single transaction, and liabilities directly associated with those assets that will be transferred in the
transaction. (In practice a disposal group could be a subsidiary, a cash-generating unit or a single
operation within an entity.)
(IFRS 5)
A disposal group could form a group of cash-generating units, a single cash-generating unit or be
part of a cash-generating unit.
The disposal group should include goodwill if it is a cash-generating unit (or group of cash-
generating units to which goodwill has been allocated under IAS 36). Only goodwill recognised in
the statement of financial position can be included in the disposal group. If a previous generally
accepted accounting practice (GAAP) allowed goodwill to be recorded directly in reserves, this
goodwill does not form part of a disposal group.
Definition
Discontinued operation: A component of an entity that has either been disposed of, or is classified
as held for sale, and:
• represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations;
• is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or
geographical area of operations; or
• is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.
Operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting
purposes, from the rest of the entity.
An entity should present and disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to
evaluate the financial effects of discontinued operations and disposals of non-current assets or
disposal groups.
An entity should disclose a single amount on the face of the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income (or statement of profit or loss where presented separately) comprising the
total of:
• the post-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations; and
• the post-tax gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or on the
disposal of the assets or disposal group(s) constituting the discontinued operation.
An entity should also disclose an analysis of the above single amount into:
• the revenue, expenses and pre-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations;
• the related income tax expense;
• the gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or on the disposal
of the assets or the discontinued operation; and
• the related income tax expense.
This may be presented either on the face of the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income or in the notes. If it is presented on the face of the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income it should be presented in a section identified as relating to discontinued
operations, ie, separately from continuing operations. This analysis is not required where the
discontinued operation is a newly acquired subsidiary that has been classified as held for sale.
An entity should disclose the net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing and financing
activities of discontinued operations. These disclosures may be presented either on the face of the
statement of cash flows or in the notes.
3.4 Presentation of a non-current asset or disposal group classified as held for sale
Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale should be presented separately
from other assets in the statement of financial position. The liabilities of a disposal group should be
presented separately from other liabilities in the statement of financial position.
• Assets and liabilities held for sale should not be offset.
• The major classes of assets and liabilities held for sale should be separately disclosed either on
the face of the statement of financial position or in the notes.
The objective of IAS 24 is to ensure that an entity’s financial statements contain the disclosures
necessary to draw attention to the possibility that its financial position and/or profit or loss may have
been affected by the existence of related parties or by related party transactions.
Definition
Related party transaction: A transfer of resources, services or obligations between related parties,
regardless of whether a price is charged.
£
Salaries and related taxes payable by S to its KMP for services rendered to S 500,000
Salaries and related taxes payable by P to S’s KMP for services rendered to S 60,000
Salaries and related taxes payable by S to its KMP for services rendered to P 20,000
Pension benefits accruing within the group-wide pension scheme to S’s KMP for
services rendered to S 50,000
Share options granted under the group-wide share option scheme to S’s KMP for
services rendered to S 28,000
658,000
Requirement
What transactions should be disclosed as key management personnel compensation in the financial
statements of S?
IFRS 1 gives guidance to entities applying IFRSs for the first time.
The adoption of a new body of accounting standards will inevitably have a significant effect on the
accounting treatments used by an entity and on the related systems and procedures. In 2005 many
countries adopted IFRS for the first time and over the next few years other countries are likely to do
the same.
In addition, many Alternative Investment Market (AIM) companies and public sector companies
adopted IFRSs for the first time for accounting periods ending in 2009 and 2010. US companies are
likely to move increasingly to IFRS, although the US Securities and Exchange Commission did not
give any definite timeline for this in its 2012 work plan.
As discussed in Chapter 2 of this Manual, the regulatory shift away from UK GAAP means that all
entities except those small enough to qualify as micro-entities will be required to report in
accordance withFRS102, with an option to use IFRS.
Preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position typically involves adjusting the
amounts reported at the same date under previous GAAP.
All adjustments are recognised directly in retained earnings (or, if appropriate, another category of
equity) not in profit or loss.
5.3 Estimates
Estimates in the opening IFRS statement of financial position must be consistent with estimates made
at the same date under previous GAAP even if further information is now available (in order to
comply with IAS 10).
5.5 Main exemptions from applying IFRSs in the opening IFRS statement of financial
position
(a) Property, plant and equipment, investment properties and intangible assets
– Fair value/previous GAAP revaluation may be used as a substitute for cost at date of transition
to IFRSs.
(b) Business combinations
For business combinations before the date of transition to IFRSs:
– The same classification (acquisition or uniting of interests) is retained as under previous GAAP.
– For items requiring a cost measure for IFRSs, the carrying value at the date of the business
combination is treated as deemed cost and IFRS rules are applied from thereon.
– Items requiring a fair value measure for IFRSs are revalued at the date of transition to IFRSs.
– The carrying value of goodwill at the date of transition to IFRSs is the amount as reported under
previous GAAP.
(c) Employee benefits
– Unrecognised actuarial gains and losses can be deemed zero at the date of transition to IFRSs.
IAS 19 is applied from then on.
(d) Cumulative translation differences on foreign operations
– Translation differences (which must be disclosed in a separate translation reserve under IFRSs)
may be deemed zero at the date of transition to IFRSs. IAS 21 is applied from then on.
(e) Adoption of IFRSs by subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures
If a subsidiary, associate or joint venture adopts IFRSs later than its parent, it measures its assets
and liabilities either:
– at the amount that would be included in the parent’s financial statements, based on the
parent’s date of transition; or
– at the amount based on the subsidiary (associate or joint venture)’s date of transition.
Disclosure
• A reconciliation of previous GAAP equity to IFRSs is required at the date of transition to IFRSs and
for the most recent financial statements presented under previous GAAP.
• A reconciliation of profit for the most recent financial statements presented under previous GAAP.
IAS 34 recommends that publicly traded entities should produce interim financial reports and, for
entities that do publish such reports, it lays down principles and guidelines for their production.
Definitions
Interim period: A financial reporting period shorter than a full financial year.
Interim financial report: A financial report containing either a complete set of financial statements (as
described in IAS 1) or a set of condensed financial statements (as described in this standard) for an
interim period.
Solution
The following are examples:
• Write down of inventories to net realisable value and the reversal of such a write down
• Recognition of a loss from the impairment of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, or
other assets, and the reversal of such an impairment loss
• Reversal of any provisions for the costs of restructuring
• Acquisitions and disposals of items of property, plant and equipment
• Commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment
• Litigation settlements
• Corrections of fundamental errors in previously reported financial data
• Any debt default or any breach of a debt covenant that has not been corrected subsequently
• Related party transactions
IAS 34 is concerned with communication – publicly traded entities need more information to be
communicated than do private companies. While a private company would often produce
management accounts, these would be for internal purposes and not communicated to the public.
6.5 Materiality
Materiality should be assessed in relation to the interim period financial data. It should be recognised
that interim measurements rely to a greater extent on estimates than annual financial data.
6.6.9 Depreciation
Depreciation should only be charged in an interim statement on non-current assets that have been
acquired, not on non-current assets that will be acquired later in the financial year.
Solution
The taxation charge in the interim financial statements is based upon the weighted average rate for
the year. In this case the entity’s tax rate for the year is expected to be 30%. The taxation charge in the
interim financial statements will be £1.8 million.
Solution
The value of the inventories in the interim financial statements at 30 June 20X4 is the lower of cost
and NRV at 30 June 20X4. This is:
100,000 × £1.20 = £120,000
• IFRS 14, Regulatory Deferral Accounts permits entities adopting IFRS for the first time to continue
to account, with some limited changes, for ‘regulatory deferral account balances’ in accordance
with their previous GAAP, both on initial adoption of IFRS and in subsequent financial statements.
• Regulatory deferral account balances, and movements in them, are presented separately in the
statement of financial position and statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
Specific disclosures are required.
IFRS 14, Regulatory Deferral Accounts was issued in January 2014 and is effective for an entity’s first
annual IFRS financial statements for a period beginning on or after 1 January 2016. IFRS 14 is an
interim standard, applicable to first-time adopters of IFRS that provide goods or services to
customers at a price or rate that is subject to rate regulation by the Government eg, the supply of gas
or electricity.
The following definitions are used in IFRS 14.
Definitions
Rate regulation: A framework for establishing the prices that can be charged to customers for goods
and services and that framework is subject to oversight and/or approval by a rate regulator.
Rate regulator: An authorised body that is empowered by statute or regulation to establish the rate
or range of rates that bind an entity.
Regulatory deferral account balance: The balance of any expense (or income) account that would
not be recognised as an asset or a liability in accordance with other Standards, but that qualifies for
deferral because it is included, or is expected to be included, by the rate regulator in establishing the
rate(s) that can be charged to customers.
7.1 Objective
The objective of IFRS 14 is to specify the financial reporting requirements for ‘regulatory deferral
account balances’ that arise when an entity provides goods or services to customers at a price or rate
that is subject to rate regulation.
7.4 Presentation
The amounts of regulatory deferral account balances are separately presented in an entity’s financial
statements.
7.5 Disclosures
Specific disclosures are required in order to enable users to assess:
• the nature of, and risks associated with, the rate regulation that establishes the price(s) the entity
can charge customers for the goods or services it provides; and
• the effects of rate regulation on the entity’s financial statements.
The auditor must consider the risk of fraud in general, and the risk of creative accounting in
particular, when auditing financial performance.
ISA (UK) 200 (Revised June 2016), Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of
an Audit in Accordance with the International Standards on Auditing (UK) states the auditor’s overall
objectives as follows:
• To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an
opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance
with an applicable financial reporting framework
• To report on the financial statements, and communicate as required by the ISAs (UK), in
accordance with the auditor’s findings
(ISA 200.11)
Note that the auditor is concerned with material misstatements arising both as a result of error, and
as a result of fraud.
We looked at creative accounting, a form of fraudulent financial reporting, in Chapter 5. We will look
at the audit approach to fraud and creative accounting in more detail in Chapter 24.
Another point which is worth drawing out is the need for the auditor to report and communicate as
required by the ISAs. As ISA 200 makes clear, the auditor must fully understand and comply with all
the ISAs relevant to the audit.
This section looks at some of the audit issues related to certain financial reporting treatments
covered earlier in this chapter.
9.5.2 Responsibilities
Management is responsible for the identification of related parties and the disclosure of transactions
with such parties. Management should set up appropriate internal controls to ensure that related
parties are identified and disclosed along with any related party transactions.
It may not be self-evident to management whether a party is related. Furthermore, many accounting
systems are not designed to either distinguish or summarise related party transactions, so
management will have to carry out additional analysis of accounting information.
The auditor has a responsibility to perform audit procedures to identify, assess and respond to the
risks of material misstatement arising from the entity’s failure to appropriately account for or disclose
related party relationships, transactions or balances.
9.5.3 Risks
The following audit risks may arise from a failure to identify a related party.
• Failure of the financial statements to comply with IAS 24.
• There may be a misstatement in the financial statements – transactions may be on a non arm’s
length basis and thus may result in assets, liabilities, profit or loss being overstated or
understated. For example, special tax rates may apply to profits reported on sales to related
parties.
• The reliance on a source of audit evidence may be misjudged. An auditor may rely on what is
perceived to be third-party evidence when in fact it is from a related party. More generally,
reliance on management assurances may be affected if the auditor were made aware of non-
disclosure of a related party.
• The motivations of related parties may be outside normal business motivations and thus may be
misunderstood by the auditor if there is non-disclosure. In the extreme, this may amount to fraud.
The inherent risk linked to related party transactions (RPT) can be high, especially where
management is unaware of the existence of all the related party relationships or transactions, or
where there is an opportunity for collusion, concealment or manipulation by management. There is
an increased risk that the auditor may fail to detect a RPT, where:
• there has been no charge made for a RPT (ie, a zero cost transaction);
• disclosure would be sensitive for directors or have adverse consequences for the company;
• the company has no formal system for detecting RPTs;
• RPTs are with a party that the auditor could not reasonably expect to know is a related party;
• RPTs from an earlier period have remained as an unsettled balance;
9.5.8 Documentation
The auditor is required to include in the audit documentation the identity of related parties and the
nature of related party relationships.
Note: The law regarding transactions with directors was covered in Chapter 1 of this Workbook.
3. Can you measure assets held for sale as per IFRS 5? (Topic 4)
4. What are the minimum components of interim financial statements under IFRS 34? (Topic
7)
5. Do you understand the role of the auditor in relation to segment information? (Topic 10)
2 Question practice
Aim to complete all self-test questions at the end of this chapter. The following self-test questions are
particularly helpful to further topic understanding and guide skills application before you proceed to
the next chapter.
Ndombe This tests IFRS 5, specifically classifying and valuing non-current assets
held for sale. This should be assumed knowledge from earlier studies, but
if you struggle you may need to go back to your earlier study material.
Once you have attempted the self-test questions, you can continue your studies by moving onto the
next chapter. In later chapters, we will recommend questions from the Question Bank for you to
attempt.
Refer back to the learning in this chapter for any questions which you did not answer correctly or
where the suggested solution has not provided sufficient explanation to answer all your queries.
Once you have attempted these questions, you can continue your studies by moving on to the next
chapter.
12 ISA 501
• Audit of segment information – ISA 501.13
13 ISA 550
• Definition of related parties – ISA 550.10
• Auditor’s responsibilities in relation to related parties – ISA 550.3–7
• Audit procedures in respect of related parties – ISA 550.11–28
14 ISA 710
• Audit procedures in respect of comparative financial statements – ISA 710.7–9
• Audit reporting in respect of comparative financial statements – ISA 710.10–19
1 AZ
AZ is a quoted manufacturing company. Its finished products are stored in a nearby warehouse until
ordered by customers. AZ has performed very well in the past, but has been in financial difficulties in
recent months and has been reorganising the business to improve performance.
The trial balance for AZ at 31 March 20X3 was as follows:
$’000 $’000
Sales 124,900
Cost of goods manufactured in the year to 31 March 20X3
(excluding depreciation) 94,000
Distribution costs 9,060
Administrative expenses 16,020
Restructuring costs 121
Interest received 1,200
Loan note interest paid 639
Land and buildings (including land $20,000,000) 50,300
Plant and equipment 3,720
Accumulated depreciation at 31 March 20X2:
Buildings 6,060
Plant and equipment 1,670
Investment properties (at market value) 24,000
Inventories at 31 March 20X2 4,852
Trade receivables 9,330
Bank and cash 1,190
Ordinary shares of $1 each, fully paid 20,000
Share premium 430
Revaluation surplus 3,125
Retained earnings at 31 March 20X2 28,077
Ordinary dividends paid 1,000
7% loan notes 20X7 18,250
Trade payables 8,120
Proceeds of share issue – 2,400
214,232 214,232
(1) The property, plant and equipment are being depreciated as follows:
Buildings 5% per annum straight line.
2 Viscum
The Viscum Company accounts for non-current assets using the cost model.
On 25 April 20X6 Viscum classified a non-current asset as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5,
Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. At that date the asset’s carrying
amount was £30,000, its fair value was estimated at £22,000 and the costs to sell at £3,000.
On 15 May 20X6 the asset was sold for net proceeds of £18,400.
Requirement
In accordance with IFRS 5, what amount should be included as an impairment loss in Viscum’s
financial statements for the year ended 30 June 20X6?
3 Reavley
The Reavley Company accounts for non-current assets using the cost model.
On 20 July 20X6 Reavley classified a non-current asset as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5,
Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. At that date the asset’s carrying
amount was £19,500, its fair value was estimated at £26,500 and the costs to sell at £1,950.
The asset was sold on 18 October 20X6 for £26,000.
Requirement
In accordance with IFRS 5, at what amount should the asset be stated in Reavley’s statement of
financial position at 30 September 20X6?
4 Smicek
The Smicek Company classified an asset as being held for sale on 31 December 20X6. The asset had
been purchased for a cost of £1.2 million on 1 January 20X4, and then had a 12-year useful life. On
31 December 20X6 its carrying amount was £900,000, its fair value was £860,000 and the expected
sale costs were £20,000.
On 31 December 20X7 the board of Smicek, having failed to sell the asset during 20X7, decided to
reverse their original decision and therefore use the asset in the business. At 31 December 20X7 the
5 Ndombe
The Ndombe Company classified a group of assets as held for sale on 31 December 20X6. Their fair
value less costs to sell was £1,180,000.
During 20X7 the company decided that one of the assets, a polishing machine, should no longer be
treated as an asset held for sale. The sale of the other assets was delayed due to events beyond the
control of Ndombe and the company remains committed to their sale, which is highly probable in
20X8.
Asset values and dates are as follows:
Requirement
Under IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations what are the amounts
that should be shown under assets on the statement of financial position at 31 December 20X6 and
31 December 20X7?
6 Sapajou
The Sapajou Company bought a property with a useful life of 10 years for £1,200,000 on 1 January
20X4.
On 1 July 20X6 the board of Sapajou made a decision to sell the property, and immediately vacated
it and advertised it for sale. At this date fair value less costs to sell was estimated at £880,000.
Negotiations with a buyer appeared successful, and a sale was provisionally agreed for 1 August
20X7 for £880,000. At the last minute the buyer withdrew and Sapajou had to re-advertise the
property.
A new buyer was found in November 20X7 and a new price was agreed at fair value less costs to sell
of £995,000. The sale is scheduled to take place in February 20X8.
Requirement
What are the amounts that should be included in profit or loss for the years ending 31 December
20X6 and 31 December 20X7?
7 Sulafat
The Sulafat Company has a 70% subsidiary Vurta and is a venturer in Piton, a joint venture company.
During the financial year to 31 December 20X6, Sulafat sold goods to both companies.
8 Phlegra
In the year ended 31 December 20X7, the Phlegra Company undertook transactions with the
following entities to the value stated.
(1) The Nereidum Company, one of whose non-executive directors is an executive director of
Phlegra: £300,000.
(2) The Chub Company, which sources 100% of its raw materials requirements from Phlegra:
£190,000.
Requirement
Under IAS 24, Related Party Disclosures, what is the total amount to be disclosed in respect of
transactions with related parties in Phlegra’s financial statements for the year ended 31 December
20X7?
9 Mareotis
The Mareotis Company is a partly owned subsidiary of the Bourne Company. In the year ended 31
December 20X7 Mareotis undertook transactions with the following entities to the value stated.
(1) The Hayles Company, in which the Wrasse Company holds 55% of the equity. Bourne holds 40%
of the equity of Wrasse and has the power to appoint 3 out of the 5 members of Wrasse’s board
of directors: £300,000.
(2) The Galaxius Company, which is controlled by Danielle (the aunt of Agnes, a member of
Mareotis’s board of directors): £500,000.
Requirement
Under IAS 24, Related Party Disclosures, what is the total amount of transactions with related parties
to be disclosed in Mareotis’s financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X7?
10 Marmoset
The Marmoset Company offers the service of transport consultations. Its accounting year ends on 31
December each year and it is currently preparing half-yearly interim financial statements for the six
months to 30 June 20X7.
During 20X7 the directors drew up a plan to introduce a new bonus scheme for all junior consultants
in order to provide incentives and improve retention. The details of the scheme were announced to
employees the day before the interim financial statements were released on 15 August 20X7. Under
the planned scheme any bonus would be paid on 31 March 20X8.
The bonus will be equal to 1% of profit before tax (calculated before recognising the bonus) of the
year ended 31 December 20X7.
The business is seasonal such that 60% of the annual profit before tax is earned in the first six months
of the year. The profit before tax in the interim financial statements for the six months to 30 June
20X7 is £6 million.
Requirement
What amount should be recognised in profit or loss for Marmoset for the six months to 30 June 20X7
in respect of the bonus, according to IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting?
11 Aconcagua
The Aconcagua Company sells fashion shoes, the price of which varies during the year. Its
accounting year ends on 31 December and it prepares half-yearly interim financial statements.
Now go back to the Introduction and ensure that you have achieved the Learning outcomes listed for
this chapter.
Profit or loss as % of
Revenue as % of total profit of all segments in Assets as % of total
revenue (£238m) profit (£29m) assets (£336m)
Chemicals * 33.6% 48.3% 32.4%
Pharmaceuticals
wholesale 28.2% 31.0% 31.0%
Pharmaceuticals retail 9.2% 6.9% 8.9%
Cosmetics 6.3% 6.9% 5.4%
Hair care 5.0% 13.8% 6.3%
Body care 17.6% 20.7% 16.1%
* The chemicals segments are aggregated due to their similar economic characteristics
At 31 December 20X5 four of the six operating segments are reportable operating segments:
Chemicals
All size criteria are met.
Pharmaceuticals wholesale
All size criteria are met.
Pharmaceuticals retail
The Pharmaceuticals retail segment is not separately reportable, as it does not meet the quantitative
thresholds. It can, however, still be reported as a separate operating segment if management
believes that information about the segment would be useful to users of the financial statements.
Alternatively, the group could consider amalgamating it with the Pharmaceuticals wholesale
segment, providing the two operating segments have similar economic characteristics and share a
majority of the ‘aggregation’ criteria which, excluding the type of customer, may be the case.
Otherwise it would be disclosed in an ‘All other segments’ column.
Cosmetics
The Cosmetics segment does not meet the quantitative thresholds and therefore is not separately
reportable. It can also be reported separately if management believes the information would be
useful to users. Alternatively the group may be able to amalgamate it with the Body care segment,
providing the operating segments have similar economic characteristics and share a majority of the
‘aggregation’ criteria. Otherwise it would also be disclosed in an ‘All other segments’ column.
Hair care
The Hair care segment is separately reported due to its profitability being greater than 10% of total
segments in profit.
Body care
All size criteria are met.
1 AZ
AZ statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 20X3
$’000
Revenue 124,900
Cost of sales (W1) (94,200)
Gross profit 30,700
Distribution costs (W1) (9,060)
Administrative expenses (W1) (17,535)
Other expenses (W1) (121)
Finance income 1,200
Finance costs (18,250 × 7%) (1,278)
Profit before tax 3,906
Income tax expense (976)
PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 2,930
Other comprehensive income:
Gain on land revaluation 4,000
Total comprehensive income for the year 6,930
$’000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (W2) 48,262
Investment properties 24,000
72,262
Current assets
Inventories (5,180 – (W3) 15) 5,165
Trade receivables 9,330
Cash and cash equivalents 1,190
15,685
87,947
Equity
Share capital (20,000 + (W4) 2,000) 22,000
Share premium (430 + (W4) 400) 830
Retained earnings (28,077 – 1,000 + 2,930) 30,007
Revaluation surplus (3,125 + 4,000) 7,125
59,962
Current liabilities
Trade payables 8,120
Income tax payable 976
Interest payable (1,278 – 639) 639
9,735
87,947
WORKINGS
(1) Expenses
Cost of
sales Distribution Admin Other
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Per TB 94,000 9,060 16,020 121
Opening inventories 4,852
Depreciation on buildings (W2) 1,515
Depreciation on P&E (W2) 513
Closing inventories (5,180 – (W3) 15) (5,165) – –
94,200 9,060 17,535 121
(3) Inventories
$’000
Defective batch:
Selling price 55
Cost to complete: repackaging required (20)
NRV 35
Cost (50)
Write-off required (15)
$’000 $’000
DEBIT Proceeds of share issue 2,400
CREDIT Share capital (2,000 × $1) 2,000
CREDIT Share premium (2,000 × $0.20) 400
2 Viscum
£11,000
IFRS 5.15 requires assets classified as held for sale to be measured at the time of classification at the
lower of (1) the carrying value (£30,000) and (2) the fair value less costs to sell (£19,000).
IFRS 5.20 requires recognition of the resulting impairment loss (£30,000 – £19,000). The gain or loss
on disposal is treated separately per IFRS 5.24.
3 Reavley
£19,500
IFRS 5.15 requires that a non-current asset held for sale should be stated at the lower of (1) the
carrying amount (£19,500) and (2) the fair value less costs to sell (£24,550).
4 Smicek
£40,000
At the end of the current year, a non-current asset that has ceased to be classified as held for sale
should be valued at the lower of:
5 Ndombe
31 December 20X6: the assets should be shown in the statement of financial position at a value of
£1,140,000.
31 December 20X7: the assets should be shown in the statement of financial position at a value of
£1,040,000.
At the end of 20X6 the assets are classified as held for sale. The assets should be measured at the
lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell (IFRS 5.15). The carrying amount was
£1,140,000 and the fair value less costs to sell was £1,180,000 so they were measured at £1,140,000.
No depreciation is charged on these assets in 20X7 (IFRS 5.25).
At the end of 20X7, it is still possible to classify the ‘other’ assets as held for sale as the company is
still committed to the sale (IFRS 5.29). These assets would be measured at fair value less costs to sell
of £880,000, as this is lower than the carrying amount of £900,000.
However, the polishing machine should be valued at the lower of £160,000 carrying amount had
classification as held for sale not occurred (£400,000 × 2/5) and the higher of fair value less costs to
sell (£190,000) and value in use (£170,000) (IFRS 5.27). This gives a value of £160,000.
This gives a total value of £1,040,000 at 31 December 20X7.
6 Sapajou
An expense of £20,000 is shown in the profit or loss part of the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 20X6.
Income of £20,000 is shown in the profit or loss part of the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 20X7.
Under IFRS 5.15 an asset classified as held for sale is measured at the lower of carrying amount
immediately before the reclassification of £900,000 (£1,200,000 – 2.5 × £120,000), and fair value less
costs to sell of £880,000. The £20,000 impairment loss is charged to profits (IFRS 5.20).
In the following year, the increase in fair value less costs to sell is £115,000, but only £20,000 of this
can be recognised in profit (IFRS 5.21) as this is the reversal of the previous impairment loss.
7 Sulafat
Disclosure is required of transactions with both Vurta and Piton. See IAS 24.3, which states that
entities under both direct and common control are related parties.
8 Phlegra
Nil under IAS 24.11 (a) two entities are not related parties simply because they have a director in
common, nor per IAS 24.11 (b) simply because the volume of transactions between them results in
economic dependence.
So neither Nereidum nor Chub is a related party of Phlegra.
10 Marmoset
Nil
Interim reports should apply the normal recognition and measurement criteria, using appropriate
estimates under IAS 34.41.
There is no legal or constructive obligation at the interim reporting date to pay the bonus, as no
announcement had been made at this date. Under IAS 34 App B B6 no expense is required.
11 Aconcagua
Inventory values change
Interim reports should apply the normal recognition and measurement criteria, using appropriate
estimates under IAS 34.41. IAS 34 App B B25–B26 links these general principles to inventories by
requiring them to be written down to net realisable value at the interim date; the write down is then
reversed at the year end, if appropriate.
So the profit decrease in the six months to 30 June 20X7 is 2,000 × (£30 – £20) = £20,000, while the
profit increase in the six months to 31 December 20X7 is 2,000 × (£28 – £20) = £16,000.