Communication Processes, Principles, and Ethics
Communication Processes, Principles, and Ethics
Process of Communication
Elements:
Communication Models
1. Aristotle’s Communication Model
Aristotle, a great philosopher initiative the earliest mass communication model called “Aristotle’s
Model of Communication”. He proposed a model before 300 B.C. who found the importance of the audience
role in the communication chain in his communication model. This model is more focused on public
speaking than interpersonal communication.
Aristotle Model of Communication is formed with five basic elements: speaker, speech, occasion,
audience, and effect.
Note that the speaker variable here is very important. Without the speaker, there will be no speech
to be produced. Depending on the profile of the speaker adjusts his or her speech. Some considerations for
the audience demographics are age, sex, background, culture, race, religion, gender, social and economic
status, and political orientation or inclination, among others. Even beliefs, views, and attitudes also play an
important role when talking about audience consideration since oftentimes, the audience brings these with
them when they decode the message in any given situation.
2. Laswell’s Model
In 1948, Harold Dwight Laswell describes communication as being focused on the following W’s:
who says what in which channel to home and with what effect as seen in the model below:
The whole process of communication begins with the communicator (who) sending out the message
(what) using a medium (in which channel) for a receiver (to whom) experiencing an effect afterward. The
process may be analyzed through the content sent, the medium used, as well as the effect on the rose plant
of the message.
While this model is similar to Aristotle’s in the sense that both are linear and have the same
components, Laswell also differs in that there are five variables involved with the addition of two: medium
and effect.
3. Shannon-Weaver’s Model
Claude Elwood Shannon and Warren Weaver’s model of communication was introduced in 1949, a
year after Laswell’s for Bell Laboratories. This model is specially designed to develop effective
communication between the sender and the receiver. Also, they find factors which affecting the
Known as the mother of all communication models, this model depicts communication as a linear
or one-way process consisting of five elements: a source (producer of the message); a transmitter (encoder
of message into signals); a channel (signal adopted for transmission); a receiver (decoder of message from
the signal); and a destination.
This model, however, has been criticized for missing one essential element in the communication process:
feedback. Without feedback, the speaker will not know whether the receiver understand the message or not.
• Attitudes — This includes attitudes towards the audience, subject, and towards oneself. For example,
for the student, the attitude is to learn more and for teachers, it is to help teach.
• Knowledge – Communicating also means that the person needs to be knowledgeable about the subject
or topic. For e.g. a teacher needs to know about the subject in detail that he or she teaches so that they
can communicate properly such that the students understand here. Note: It refers, not to the general
knowledge, but to the knowledge of the subject that the person is communicating and their familiarity
with it.
• Social system — The social system includes the various aspects of society like values, beliefs, culture,
religion, and a general understanding of society. It is where the communication takes place. For
example, classrooms differ from country to country just like people’s behaviors and how they
communicate, etc. Note: We can communicate only to the extent that the social system allows. When
we communicate, we take the social system into account.
• Culture: The culture of a particular society also comes under the social system. According to this
model, people can communicate only if the above requirements are met in the proper or adequate
proportion.
Encoder: The sender of the message, from where the message originates, is referred to as the encoder. So,
the source encodes the message here.
MESSAGE
• Content — The body of a message, from the beginning to the end, comprises its content. For example,
whatever the class teacher teaches in the class, from beginning to end, is the content of the message.
• Elements — It includes various things like language, gestures, body language, etc. They constitute all
the elements of a particular message. Any content is accompanied by some elements.
• Treatment — It refers to the packing of the message and the way in which the message is conveyed
or the way in which it is passed on or delivered. Note: When there is too much treatment,
communication will not go smoothly.
• Structure – The structure of the message refers to how it is arranged; the way people structure the
message into various parts. Note: The message is the same, but if the structure is not properly arranged
then the receiver will not understand the message.
• Code – The code of the message refers to the means through which it is sent and in what form. It could
be, for example, language, body language, gestures, music, etc. Even culture is a code. Through this,
people give and receive messages and communication takes place. Note: Only when the code is clear,
the message will be clear. The wrong usage may lead to misinterpretation.
CHANNEL: It refers to the five sense organs and occurs through one or more of these senses/channels.
• Hearing: The use of ears to receive the message. For example, orally transmitted messages,
interpersonal communication, etc.
Decoder: The person who receives the message and decodes it.
RECEIVER: The receiver needs to think about all the contents and elements of the source, so as to
communicate/responds to the sender effectively. Berlo’s model believes that for effective communication to
take place, the source and the receiver need to be on the same level. Only then communication will happen
or take place properly. Hence, the source and the receiver should be similar.
For example, if the communication skill of the source is good, then the receiver should have equally
good listening skills. It cannot be said that the receiver does not receive the whole message because even
though he may receive it but may not be able to interpret its meaning. For effective communication, the
source and the receiver need to be on the same level. Note: Self-image differs from person to person. For
communication, the person should consider the receiver, speak accordingly, and give them what they need.
5. Transaction Model
This model is a two – way process with the inclusion of feedback as one element. As shown in the
figure, this model is more interactive. There is a collaborative exchange of messages between
communicators with the aim of understanding each other. It also shows that a barrier, such as noise, may
interfere with the flow of communication.
• using polite words and tone to show respect to the receiver of the message.
• applying tact and diplomacy
• developing the “WE” attitude using positive words instead of negative
• being considerate of the feelings of the receiver
• selecting gender-free terms
• responding promptly to important messages
2. Clarity may involve correct word usage, grammar, pronunciation, sentence construction and delivery.
Messages which are unclear oftentimes do not achieve their desired effect.
3. Conciseness is saying what needs to be said in as few words as possible. Avoid flowery words.
Remember, “our goal is to communicate and not to impress.”
4. Concreteness. This refers to being specific. Providing example when necessary makes a message more
comprehensible.
5. Completeness. To avoid ambiguity, messages should not leave out important details that a receiver
expects to know. What, who, when, where, why and how should be answered.
Ethics of Communication
Madrunio R. and Martin P. (2018). Purposive Communication Using English in Multilingual Contexts.
Quezon City: C&E Publising, Inc.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1, p. 100). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
McLean, S. (2005). The basics of interpersonal communication (p. 14). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Vocate, D. (Ed.). (1994). Intrapersonal communication: Different voices, different minds. NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Wood, J. (1997). Communication in our lives (p. 22). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.