EPC2021 CPD Internal Controls 21062021
EPC2021 CPD Internal Controls 21062021
development
Auditing and Assurance
Internal controls
Internal controls
❑ A control is an activity that prevents or detects and correct errors to mitigate risks
― Preventative controls – prevent undesirable events from occurring and facilitate desirable events; and
― Detective controls – identify or detect undesirable events and correct those errors/misstatements
Preventative
❑ Privilege users approval
❑ Passwords protection
❑ Review changes
Detective
― Completeness and accuracy of information
― Evidence the review
Preventative
Automated
❑ Backups Manual
❑ Anti-virus controls
Preventative
❑ Firewalls and encryptions
❑ Penetration testing
International Standard on Auditing 330 (ISA 330) “The auditors’ responses to assessed risks” provides that the auditor shall
design and perform tests of controls to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to the operating effectiveness of relevant
controls when (ISA 330:8):
❑ The auditor’s assessment of risks of material misstatement at the assertion level includes an expectation that the controls are
operating effectively (that is, the auditor intends to rely on the operating effectiveness of controls in determining the nature,
timing and extent of substantive procedures): OR
― Impossible to design effective substantive procedures (e.g. entity conducts its business using IT and no documentation of
transaction is produced or maintained, other than through the IT system)
― If there is a significant risk due to fraud or error, the auditor must test the suitability of the design and appropriate
implementation of the control at a minimum.
❑ Substantive procedures alone cannot provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence at the assertion level.
When the auditor obtains audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of controls during an interim period, the auditor:
❑ Obtain audit evidence about changes to those controls subsequent to the interim period; and
❑ Determine what additional audit evidence should be obtained for the remaining period (ISA330: 12).
Risk assessment procedures to obtain audit evidence about the design and implementation of relevant controls include:
❑ Inquiring of entity personnel
❑ Observing the application of specific controls
❑ Inspecting documents and reports
❑ Tracing transactions through the information system relevant to financial reporting
Test of controls
❑ Suitability of the design
❑ Appropriate implementation
❑ Operating effectiveness
International Standard on Auditing 265 (ISA 265) “Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those Charged with
Governance and Management” provides that the objective of the auditor is to communicate appropriately to those charged with
governance and management deficiencies in internal control that the auditor has identified during the audit & that, in the auditor’s
professional judgment, are of sufficient importance to merit their respective attentions (ISA 265:5).
Significant deficiency in internal control – a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control that, in the auditor’s
professional judgment, is of sufficient importance to merit the attention of those charged with governance.
The auditor shall include in the written communication of significant deficiencies in internal control: (a) a description of the
deficiencies and an explanation of their potential effects; and (b) sufficient information to enable those charged with governance
and management to understand the context of the communication.
International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3402 (ISAE 3402) “Assurance Reports on Controls at a Service Organisation”
provides various objectives for the service auditor (ISAE 3402:8); these being to obtain and report on reasonable assurance about
whether, in all material respects, based on suitable criteria:
❑ The service organisation’s description of its system fairly presents the system as designed and implemented throughout the
specific period or as at a specific date;
❑ The controls related to the control objectives stated in the service organisation’s description of its system were suitably
designed throughout the specific period or as at a specific date; and
❑ Where included in the scope of the engagement, the controls operated effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the
control objectives stated in the service organisation’s description of its system were achieved throughout the period.
At the pre-engagement activities of an assurance engagement such as this, the assurance provider spent more time discussing the
engagement with management or those charged with governance to understand the purpose of the engagement and to identify
the five elements of engagement set up.
This is done more so than you would for an audit engagement, where the purpose of the engagement and the five elements are
generally understood and clear. The elements are as follows:
❑ Three-party relationship
― User entity
― Service auditor
― Service organisation
❑ Appropriate subject matter
❑ Suitable criteria (i.e. benchmarks) and control objectives
❑ Sufficient and appropriate evidence
❑ Written report
Key factors to consider in evaluating the assurance report on controls at the service organisation and understanding extend of
reliance to be placed thereon:
❑ Whether the service auditor complies with relevant ethical requirements, including those pertaining to independence;
❑ Whether the service auditor has the capabilities and competence to perform the engagement;
❑ Whether the scope of the engagement and the service organisation’s description of its system will not be so limited that they
are unlikely to be useful to the user entities and their auditors – this includes:
— Whether the scope is limited to type 1 report; or
— Whether it is a type 2 report:
o Reliance period
o Bridging letters
❑ Sampling and completeness and accuracy of the population which were the subject of the samples
❑ Whether the assurance report was qualified or unqualified for each of the control objectives;
❑ What are the control deficiencies thereon and the impact to the user entity; and
International Standard on Auditing 402 (ISA 402) “Audit considerations relating to an entity using a service organisation”
provides that the objective of the user auditor, when the user entity uses the services of a service organisation, are to obtain an
understanding of the nature and significance of the services provided by the service organisation and their effect on the user
entity’s internal control relevant to the audit, sufficient to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement and to design
and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks (ISA 402:7).
❑ Obtain an understanding from user manuals, system overviews, technical manuals, service level agreements, internal audit
reports and service auditors reports on the controls at the service organisation (ISA 402:A1).
❑ Examples of service organisation services that are relevant to the audit include (ISA 402:A4):
― Maintenance of the user entity’s accounting records
― Management of assets
― Initiating, recording or processing transactions as agent of the user entity