Lecture 27
Lecture 27
Lecture 27
MANAGEMENT
The Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) is a statutory body of the Government of
India under the Ministry of Labour and Employment. It administers a compulsory contributory
Provident Fund Scheme, Pension Scheme and an Insurance Scheme. It is one of the largest
provident fund institutions in the world in terms of members and volume of financial transactions
that it has been carrying on.
The Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 applies to the whole
India except Jammu & Kashmir.
Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 is applicable to:
Every establishment which is engaged in any one or more of the industries specified in
Schedule I of the Act or any activity notified by Central Government in the Official
Gazette. (List of Industries/Establishments)
Employing 20 or more persons .
Cinema Theatres employing 5 or more persons.
2. Definitions
3. Power to apply the Act to an establishment which has a common provident fund with
another establishment –
5E. Delegation
7. Modification of Scheme
7F. Resignation
7G. Salary and allowances and other terms and conditions of service of presiding officer
7H. Staff of Tribunal
7K. Right of appellant to take assistance of legal practitioner and of government etc. to
appoint presenting officers
13. Inspectors
14. Penalties
14A
14AA
SCHEDULE I
Schedule II
Schedule III
Schedule IV
An Act to provide for the institution of provident funds, pension fund and deposit-linked
insurance fund for employees in factories and other establishments.
1. Short title, extent and application.- (1) This Act may be called the Employees‟ Provident
Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
(a) to every establishment which is a factory engaged in any industry specified in Schedule I and
in which twenty or more persons are employed and
(b) to any other establishment employing twenty or more persons or class of such establishments
which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify, in this
behalf:
Provided that the Central Government may, after giving not less than two months‟ notice of its
intention so to do, by notification in the Official Gazette, apply the provisions of this Act to any
establishment employing such number of persons less than twenty as may be specified in the
notification.
(5) An establishment to which this Act applies shall continue to be governed by this Act
notwithstanding that the number of persons employed therein at any time falls below twenty.
(i) in relation to an establishment belonging to, or under the control of, the Central Government
or in relation to, an establishment connected with a railway company, a major port, a mine or an
oil-filed or a controlled industry or in relation to an establishment having departments or
branches in more than one State, the Central Government: and
(aa) “authorised officer” means the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Additional Central
Provident Fund Commissioner, Deputy Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Provident Fund
Commissioner or such other officer as may be authorised by the Central Government, by
notification in the Official Gazette;
(b) “basic wages” means all emoluments which are earned by an employee while on duty or on
leave or on holidays with wages in either case in accordance with the terms of the contract of
employment and which are paid or payable in cash to him, but does not include-
(ii) any dearness allowance that is to say, all cash payments by whatever name called paid to an
employee on account of a rise in the cost of living, house-rent allowance, overtime allowance,
bonus, commission or any other similar allowance payable to the employee in respect of his
employment or of work done in such employment;
(c) “Contribution” means a contribution payable in respect of a member under a scheme or the
contribution payable in respect of an employee to whom the Insurance Scheme applies;
(d) “controlled industry” means any industry the control of which by the Union has been
declared by a Central Act to be expedient in the public interest;
(i) in relation to an establishment which is a factory, the owner or occupier of the factory,
including the agent of such owner or occupier, the legal representative of a deceased owner or
occupier and, where a person has been named as a manager of the factory under clause f of sub-
section 1 of section 7 of the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948), the person so named; and
(ii) in relation to any other establishment, the person who, or the authority which, has the
ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment, and where the said affairs are entrusted to a
manager, managing director or managing agent, such manager, managing director or managing
agent;
(f) “employee” means any person who is employed for wages in any kind of work, manual or
otherwise, in or in connection with the work of an establishment and who gets his wages directly
or indirectly from the employer, and includes any person,-
(i) employed by or through a contractor in or in connection with the work of the establishment;
(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961
(52 of 1961) or under the standing orders of the establishment;
Merely Because Workers Were Permitted To Do Work Off Site, It Would Not Take Away Their
Status As 'Employees': SC [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court has observed that merely because workers were permitted to do the work off
site, it would not take away their status as employees for the purpose of Employees' Provident
Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
In this case [The Officer In Charge, Sub Regional Provident Fund Office, vs. M/s Godavari
Garments Limited], the Company, engaged women workers who were provided with cut fabric,
thread, buttons, etc. to be made into garments at their own homes. The sewing machines used by
the women workers were owned by them, and not provided by the Company. The Provident
Fund Officer held that the women workers engaged for stitching garments were covered by the
definition of "employee" under Section 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Fund and
Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The High court set aside this order observing that the
Company had no direct or indirect control over the women workers.
The issue before the bench comprising Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Indu Malhotra
was whether the women workers employed by the Company are covered by the definition of
"employee" under Section 2(f) of the EPF Act or not The bench noted that the definition of
"employee" under Section 2(f) of the EPF Act is an inclusive definition, and is widely worded to
include any person engaged either directly or indirectly in connection with the work of an
establishment. The court also reiterated that Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 is a beneficial social welfare legislation which was enacted by the
Legislature for the benefit of the workmen. Merely because the women workers were permitted
to do the work off site, would not take away their status as employees, the bench said. It further
observed:
"The mere fact that the women workers stitched the garments at home, would make no
difference. It is the admitted position that the women workers were paid wages directly by the
Respondent Company on a per piece basis for every garment stitched”
(ff) “exempted employee” means an employee to whom a Scheme or the Insurance Scheme, as
the case may be, would, but for the exemption granted under section 17, have applied;
(g) “factory” means any premises, including the precincts thereof, in any part of which a
manufacturing process is being carried on or is ordinarily so carried on, whether with the aid of
power or without the aid of power;
(i) “industry” means any industry specified in Schedule I, and includes any other industry added
to the Schedule by notification under section 4;
(ia) “Insurance Fund” means the Deposit-linked Insurance Scheme framed under sub-section 2 of
section 6C;
(ib) “Insurance Scheme” means the Employees‟ Deposit-linked Insurance Scheme framed under
sub-section 1 of section 6C;
(ic) “manufacture” or “manufacturing process” means any process for making, altering,
repairing, ornamenting, finishing, packing, oiling, washing, cleaning, breaking up, demolishing
or otherwise treating or adapting any article or substance with a view to its use, sale, transport,
delivery or disposal;
(k)“occupier of a factory” means the person, who has ultimate control over the affairs of the
factory, and, where the said affairs are entrusted to a managing agent, such agent shall be
deemed to be the occupier of the factory;
(kA) “Pension Fund” means the Employees‟ Pension Fund established under sub-section 2 of
section 6A;
(kB) “Pension Scheme” means the Employees‟ Pension Scheme framed under sub-section 1 of
section 6A;
(kb) “Recovery Officer” means any officer of the Central Government, State
Government or the Board of Trustees constituted under section 5A, who may be authorised by
the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, to exercise the powers of a
Recovery Officer under this Act;
(l) “Scheme” means the Employees‟ Provident Funds scheme framed under section 5;
(l1) “superannuation”, in relation to an employee, who is the member of the Pension Scheme,
means the attainment, by the said employee, of the age of fifty-eight years.
(m) “Tribunal” means the Employees‟ Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal constituted under
section 7D.
2A. Establishments to include all departments and branches. - For the removal of doubts, it
is hereby declared that where an establishment consists of different departments or has branches,
whether situate in the same place or in different places, all such departments or branches shall be
treated as parts of the same establishment.