2 Revision Capital Structure
2 Revision Capital Structure
By Dr.Bhavish Jugurnath
Learning Objectives
◼ You should understand how capital structure
affect corporate value
◼ You should understand the financial risk -
leverage
◼ You should understand capital structure
theories and their implications for managers
2
How can capital structure
affect value?
∞ FCFt
V = ∑
t=1 (1 + WACC)t
(Continued…)
4
4
The Effect of Additional
Debt on WACC
◼ Debtholders have a prior claim on cash flows relative
to stockholders.
◼ Debtholders’ “fixed” claim increases risk of stockholders’
“residual” claim.
◼ Cost of stock, rs, goes up.
◼ Debt increases risk of bankruptcy
◼ Causes pre-tax cost of new debt, rd, to increase
◼ Adding debt increase percent of firm financed with
low-cost debt (wd) and decreases percent financed
with high-cost equity (wce)
◼ Net effect on WACC = uncertain.
5
(Continued…)
6
6
Agency costs
◼ Additional debt can affect the behavior of
managers.
◼ Reductions in agency costs: debt “pre-commits,”
or “bonds,” free cash flow for use in making
interest payments. Thus, managers are less likely
to waste FCF on perquisites or non-value adding
acquisitions.
◼ Increases in agency costs: debt can make
managers too risk-averse, causing
“underinvestment” in risky but positive NPV
projects.
(Continued…)
7
Asymmetric Information
and Signaling
◼ Managers know the firm’s future prospects
better than investors.
◼ Managers would not issue additional equity if
they thought the current stock price was less
than the true value of the stock (given their
inside information).
◼ Hence, investors often perceive an additional
issuance of stock as a negative signal, and
the stock price falls.
8
8
Business Risk versus Financial
Risk
◼ Business risk:
◼ Uncertainty in future EBIT.
◼ Depends on business factors such as competition,
type of product, etc.
◼ Financial risk:
◼ Additional business risk concentrated on common
stockholders when financial leverage is used.
◼ Depends on the amount of debt financing.
10
MM Results: Zero Taxes
◼ MM assume: (1) no transactions costs; (2) no
restrictions or costs to short sales; and (3) individuals
can borrow at the same rate as corporations.
◼ Under these assumptions, MM prove that if the total
CF to investors of Firm U and Firm L are equal, then
the total values of Firm U and Firm L must be equal:
◼ V L = V U.
◼ Because FCF and values of firms L and U are equal,
their WACCs are equal.
◼ Therefore, capital structure is irrelevant.
11
11
12
12
MM relationship between value and debt
when corporate taxes are considered.
Value of Firm, V
VL
TD
VU
Debt
0
13
14
14
Conclusions with Personal
Taxes
◼ Use of debt financing remains
advantageous, but benefits are less
than under only corporate taxes.
◼ Firms should still use 100% debt.
15
15
Trade-off Theory
◼ MM theory ignores bankruptcy (financial
distress) costs, which increase as more
leverage is used.
◼ At low leverage levels, tax benefits outweigh
bankruptcy costs.
◼ At high levels, bankruptcy costs outweigh tax
benefits.
◼ An optimal capital structure exists that
balances these costs and benefits.
◼ See Figure 4 on textbook
16
16
Signaling Theory
◼ MM assumed that investors and managers
have the same information.
◼ But, managers often have better information.
Thus, they would:
◼ Sell stock if stock is overvalued.
◼ Sell bonds if stock is undervalued.
◼ Investors understand this, so view new stock
sales as a negative signal.
◼ Implications for managers?
17
17
18
Debt Financing and Agency
Costs
◼ One agency problem is that managers can use
corporate funds for non-value maximizing purposes.
◼ The use of financial leverage:
◼ Bonds “free cash flow.”
◼ Forces discipline on managers to avoid perks and non-value
adding acquisitions.
◼ A second agency problem is the potential for
“underinvestment”.
◼ Debt increases risk of financial distress.
◼ Therefore, managers may avoid risky projects even if they
have positive NPVs.
19
19
20
20
Empirical Evidence (Continued)
◼ After big stock price run ups, debt ratio falls,
but firms tend to issue equity instead of debt.
◼ Inconsistent with trade-off model.
◼ Inconsistent with pecking order.
◼ Consistent with windows of opportunity.
◼ Many firms, especially those with growth
options and asymmetric information
problems, tend to maintain excess borrowing
capacity.
21
21
22
Implications for Managers
(Continued)
23
23
RECAP
E D
rwacc = rE + rD (1 − c )
E + D E + D
24
24
WACC
25
25
REDEEMABLE BONDS
Redeemable bonds
Face value is repaid at maturity.
The value of a bond is determined by
Face Value
Present value of a single value
Coupon payments
1 − (1 + YTM )− N F
VB = C +
YTM (1 + YTM ) N 26
26
VALUATION OF ORDINARY EQUITY
ke = cost of equity
27
28
28
29
29
30
30