2320

Alkalinity

Approved by Standard Methods Committee, 1997. Editorial revisions, 2011 and 2021.

2320  A. Introduction

1. Discussion bases if these are present. Alkalinity in excess of alkaline earth

metal concentrations is important for determining the suitability
Alkalinity of a water is its acid-neutralizing capacity. It is the of a water for irrigation. Alkalinity measurements are used in the
sum of all the titratable bases. The measured value may vary sig- interpretation and control of water and wastewater treatment pro-
nificantly with the endpoint pH used. Alkalinity is a measure of cesses. Raw domestic wastewater has an alkalinity less than, or
an aggregate property of water and can be interpreted in terms of only slightly greater than, that of the water supply. Properly oper-
specific substances only when the chemical composition of the ating anaerobic digesters typically have supernatant alkalinities
sample is known. in the range of 2000 to 4000 mg/L calcium carbonate (CaCO3).1
Alkalinity is important for many uses and when treating nat-
ural waters and wastewaters. Because the alkalinity of many Reference
surface waters is primarily a function of carbonate, bicarbonate,
and hydroxide content, it is taken as an indication of the con- 1. Pohland FG, Bloodgood DE. Laboratory studies on mesophilic and
centration of these constituents. The measured values also may thermophilic anaerobic sludge digestion. J Water Pollut Control Fed.
include contributions from borates, phosphates, silicates, or other 1963;35(1):11–42.

2320  B. Titration Method

1. General Discussion determination. Phenolphthalein or metacresol purple may be used

for alkalinity titration to pH 8.3. Bromocresol green or a mixed
a. Principle: Hydroxyl ions present in a sample as a result of bromocresol green-methyl red indicator may be used for pH 4.5.
dissociation or hydrolysis of solutes react with additions of stan- c. Interferences: Soaps, oily matter, suspended solids, or
dard acid. Alkalinity thus depends on the endpoint pH used. For precipitates may coat the glass electrode and cause a sluggish
methods of determining inflection points from titration curves response. Allow additional time between titrant additions to let
and the rationale for titrating to fixed pH endpoints, see Section the electrode come to equilibrium or clean the electrodes occa-
2310 B.1a. sionally. Do not filter, dilute, concentrate, or alter the sample.
For samples of low alkalinity (less than 20 mg/L CaCO3) use d. Selection of procedure: Determine the sample’s alkalinity
an extrapolation technique based on the near proportionality of from the volume of standard acid required to titrate a portion to
concentration of hydrogen ions to excess of titrant beyond the a designated pH taken from paragraph b above. Titrate at room
equivalence point. The amount of standard acid required to reduce temperature with a properly calibrated pH meter or electrically
the pH exactly 0.30 pH unit is measured carefully. Because this operated titrator, or use color indicators. If using color indicators,
change in pH corresponds to an exact doubling of the hydrogen prepare and titrate an indicator blank.
ion concentration, a simple extrapolation can be made to the Report alkalinity less than 20 mg/L CaCO3 only if it has been
equivalence point.1,2 determined by the low-alkalinity method of 2320 B.4d.
b. Endpoints: When alkalinity is due entirely to carbonate or Construct a titration curve for standardization of reagents.
bicarbonate content, the pH at the equivalence point of the titration Color indicators may be used for routine and control titrations
is determined by the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) at that in the absence of interfering color and turbidity and for prelimi-
stage. CO2 concentration depends, in turn, on the total carbonate nary titrations to select sample size and strength of titrant (see ¶ e
species originally present and any losses that may have occurred below).
during titration. The pH values in Table 2320:1 are suggested as e. Sample size: See Section 2310 B.1e for selection of size
the equivalence points for the corresponding alkalinity concentra- sample to be titrated and normality of titrant, substituting 0.02 N
tions as milligrams CaCO3 per liter. Phenolphthalein alkalinity is or 0.1 N sulfuric (H2SO4) or hydrochloric (HCl) acid for the stan-
the term traditionally used for the quantity measured by titration dard alkali of that method. For the low-alkalinity method, titrate a
to pH 8.3 irrespective of the colored indicator, if any, used in the 200-mL sample with 0.02 N H2SO4 from a 10-mL buret.

https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.023 1
 2320 ALKALINITY - B. Titration Method

Table 2320:1 Endpoint pH Values 1) Dissolve 100 mg bromocresol green sodium salt and 20 mg
Endpoint pH methyl red sodium salt in 100 mL reagent water.
Total Phenolphthalein 2) Dissolve 100 mg bromocresol green and 20 mg methyl red
Test Condition Alkalinity Alkalinity in 100 mL 95% ethyl alcohol or isopropyl alcohol.
f. Metacresol purple indicator solution, pH 8.3 indicator: Dis-
Alkalinity, mg/L CaCO3:
solve 100 mg metacresol purple in 100 mL water.
 30 4.9 8.3
 150 4.6 8.3 g. Phenolphthalein solution, alcoholic, pH 8.3 indicator.
 500 4.3 8.3
Silicates, phosphates 4. Procedure
  known or suspected 4.5 8.3
Routine or automated analyses 4.5 8.3
Industrial waste or complex system 4.5 8.3 a. Color change: See Section 2310 B.4b.
b. Potentiometric titration curve: Follow the procedure for
f. Sampling and storage: See Section 2310 B.1f. determining acidity (Section 2310 B.4c), substituting the appro-
g. Quality control (QC): The QC practices considered to be an priate normality of standard acid solution for standard NaOH, and
integral part of each method are summarized in Table 2020:1 and continue the titration to pH 4.5 or lower. Do not filter, dilute, con-
Table 2020:2. centrate, or alter the sample.
c. Potentiometric titration to preselected pH: Determine the
2. Apparatus appropriate endpoint pH according to 2320 B.1b. Prepare the sam-
ple and titration assembly (Section 2310 B.4c). Titrate to the end-
a. See Section 2310 B.2. point pH without recording intermediate pH values and without
b. Drying oven, capable of operating at 250 ± 2 ºC. undue delay. As the endpoint is approached make smaller addi-
tions of acid and be sure that pH equilibrium is reached before
3. Reagents adding more titrant.
d. Potentiometric titration of low alkalinity: For alkalinities less
a. Sodium carbonate solution, approximately 0.05 N: Dry 3 to than 20 mg/L titrate 100 to 200 mL according to the procedure of
5 g primary standard Na2CO3 at 250 °C for 4 h and cool in a des- paragraph c above, using a 10-mL microburet and 0.02 N standard
iccator. Weigh 2.5 ± 0.2 g (to the nearest mg), transfer to a 1-L acid solution. Stop the titration at a pH in the range 4.3 to 4.7 and
volumetric flask, fill the flask to the mark with reagent water, and record the volume and exact pH. Carefully add additional titrant to
stir until dissolved. Do not keep longer than 1 week. reduce the pH exactly 0.30 pH unit and again record the volume.
b. Standard sulfuric acid or hydrochloric acid, 0.1 N: Prepare
an acid solution of approximately 0.1 N and determine exact nor- 5. Calculations
mality as follows. Standardize against 40.00 mL 0.05 N Na2CO3
solution, with about 60 mL water, in a beaker by titrating poten- a. Potentiometric titration to endpoint pH:
tiometrically to pH of about 5. Lift out the electrodes, rinse into
the same beaker, and boil gently for 3 to 5 min under a watch A× N × 50 000
glass cover. Cool to room temperature, rinse the cover glass in the Alkalinity, mg L CaCO3 =
mL sample
beaker, and finish titrating to the pH inflection point. Calculate
normality:
where:
A× B A = mL standard acid used, and
Normality, N =
53.00 ×C N = normality of standard acid.

or
where:
A = g Na2CO3 weighed into 1-L flask, A× t ×1000
B = mL Na2CO3 solution taken for titration, and Alkalinity, mg L CaCO3 =
mL sample
C = mL acid used.

Use measured normality in calculations or adjust to 0.1000 N; where:

1 mL 0.1000 N solution = 5.00 mg CaCO3.
t = titer of standard acid, mg/mL CaCO3.
c. Standard sulfuric acid or hydrochloric acid, 0.02 N: Dilute
200.00 mL 0.1000 N standard acid to 1000 mL with reagent Report pH of endpoint used as follows: “The alkalinity to pH
water. Standardize by potentiometric titration of 15.00 mL 0.05 N ____=____ mg/L CaCO3” and indicate clearly if this pH corre-
Na2CO3 according to the procedure of paragraph b above; sponds to an inflection point of the titration curve.
1 mL = 1.00 mg CaCO3. b. Potentiometric titration of low alkalinity:
d. Bromocresol green indicator solution, pH 4.5 indicator: Dis- Total alkalinity, mg/L CaCO3
solve 100 mg bromocresol green, sodium salt, in 100 mL reagent
water.
(2 B − C )× N × 50 000
e. Mixed bromocresol green-methyl red indicator solution:3 =
Use either the aqueous or the alcoholic solution: mL sample

https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.023 2
 2320 ALKALINITY - B. Titration Method

Table 2320:2. Alkalinity Relationships Similarly, if difficulty is experienced with the phenolphthalein
Hydroxide Carbonate endpoint, or if a check on the phenolphthalein titration is desired,
Result of Alkalinity as Alkalinity as Bicarbonate Concentration calculate phenolphthalein alkalinity as CaCO3 from the results of
Titration CaCO3 CaCO3 as CaCO3 the nomographic determinations of carbonate and hydroxide ion
concentrations:
P=0 0 0 T
P < ½T 0 2P T – 2P
P = ½T 0 2P 0 P = 1/2  CO32−  +  OH− 
P > ½T 2P − T 2(T – P) 0    
P=T T 0 0
P = phenolphthalein alkalinity; T = total alkalinity. 6. Precision and Bias
where:
No general statement can be made about precision because
   B = mL titrant to first recorded pH, of the great variation in sample characteristics. The precision of
    C = total mL titrant to reach pH 0.3 unit lower, the titration is likely to be much greater than the uncertainties
    N = normality of acid, and involved in sampling and sample handling before the analysis.
50 000 = equivalent weight of CaCO3 (mg). In the range of 10 to 500 mg/L, when the alkalinity is due entirely
c. Calculation of alkalinity relationships: The results obtained to carbonates or bicarbonates, a standard deviation of 1 mg/L
from the phenolphthalein and total alkalinity determinations CaCO3 can be achieved. Forty analysts in 17 laboratories analyzed
offer a means for stoichiometric classification of the three prin- synthetic samples containing increments of bicarbonate equivalent
cipal forms of alkalinity present in many waters. The classifica- to 120 mg/L CaCO3. The titration procedure of 2320 B.4b was used,
tion ascribes the entire alkalinity to bicarbonate, carbonate, and with an endpoint pH of 4.5. The standard deviation was 5 mg/L and
hydroxide, and assumes the absence of other (weak) inorganic or the average bias (lower than the true value) was 9 mg/L.5
organic acids, such as silicic, phosphoric, and boric acids. It fur- Sodium carbonate solutions equivalent to 80 and 65 mg/L
ther presupposes the incompatibility of hydroxide and bicarbonate CaCO3 were analyzed by 12 laboratories according to the proce-
alkalinities. Because the calculations are made on a stoichiometric dure of 2320 B.4c.6 The standard deviations were 8 and 5 mg/L,
basis, ion concentrations in the strictest sense are not represented respectively, with negligible bias.6 Four laboratories analyzed
in the results, which may differ significantly from actual concen- 6 samples having total alkalinities of about 1000 mg/L CaCO3 and
trations especially at pH >10. According to this scheme: containing various ratios of carbonate:bicarbonate by the proce-
1) Carbonate (CO32−) alkalinity is present when phenolphthalein dures of both 2320 B.4a and c. The pooled standard deviation
alkalinity is not zero but is less than total alkalinity. was 40 mg/L, with negligible difference between the procedures.
2) Hydroxide (OH−) alkalinity is present if phenolphthalein alka-
linity is more than half the total alkalinity. References
3) Bicarbonate (HCO3−) alkalinity is present if phenolphthalein
alkalinity is less than half the total alkalinity. These relation- 1. Larson TE, Henley LM. Determination of low alkalinity or acidity in
water. Anal Chem. 1955;27(5):851–852.
ships may be calculated by the following scheme, where P is
2. Thomas JFJ, Lynch JJ. Determination of carbonate alkalinity in natu-
phenolphthalein alkalinity and T is total alkalinity (2330 B.1b). ral waters. J Amer Water Works Assoc. 1960;52(2):259–268.
Select the smaller value of P or (T−P). Then, carbonate alka- 3. Cooper SS. The mixed indicator bromocresol green-methyl red for
linity equals twice the smaller value. When the smaller value is carbonates in water. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed. 1941;13(7):466–470.
P, the balance (T−2P) is bicarbonate. When the smaller value is 4. Jenkins SR, Moore RC. A proposed modification to the classical
(T−P), the balance (2P−T) is hydroxide. All results are expressed method of calculating alkalinity in natural waters. J Amer Water
as CaCO3. The mathematical conversion of the results is shown Works Assoc. 1977;69(1):56–60.
in Table 2320:2. (A modification of Table 2320:2 that is more 5. Winter JA, Midgett MR. FWPCA method study 1: Mineral and
accurate when P . ½T has been proposed.4) physical analyses. Washington DC: Federal Water Pollution Control
Alkalinity relationships also may be computed nomographi- Administration; 1969.
6. Smith R. Research Rep. No. 379. South Africa: Council for Scientific
cally (see Carbon Dioxide, Section 4500-CO2). Accurately measure
and Industrial Research; 1980.
pH, calculate OH− concentration as milligrams CaCO3 per liter,
and calculate concentrations of CO32− and HCO3 as milligrams
CaCO3 per liter from the OH− concentration, and the phenol- Bibliography
phthalein and total alkalinities by the following equations:
American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard methods for acidity
or alkalinity of water; Pub. D1067-70 (reapproved 1977). Philadelphia,
CO32− = 2 P − 2  OH−  (PA): ASTM International; 1982.
  Skougstad MW, Fishman MJ, Friedman LC, Erdman DE, Duncan SS.
Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial
sediments. In: Techniques of water-resources investigation of the
United States Geological Survey. Washington DC: U.S. Geological
HCO3− = T − 2P +  OH− 
  Survey; 1979, Book 5, Chapter A1.

Published Online: August 27, 2018

Revised: February 2, 2021
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.023 3