Importance of Annual Budget
Importance of Annual Budget
Importance of Annual Budget
WHAT IS A BUDGET?
The word `budget’ came from a French word `bougette’ meaning little bag. In Britain, the word
was used to describe the leather bag in which the chancellor of the exchanger used to carry to the
parliament; the statement of government needs and sources as opined by Omolehinwa (2005).
After several thoughts of consensus, Omolehinwa continued, the budget became the document
contained in the bags which represent plan of government expressed in money and submitted to
the legislatives for approval.
Stage 1: Review
Reviewing past performance against budgets can be revealing. How accurate was the budget?
Where did the underspends and overspends occur? These questions can help you shape your
school budget and increase its accuracy. Look at the cost base too. It can give you a foundation
on which to build your budget and be a prompt to review expenditure. Benchmarking against
similar schools can help you understand how your spending compares and put it into context. It’s
also an opportunity to identify cost savings or improvements.
Stage 2: Planning
Once you’ve gathered your historical data and carried out the benchmarking, it’s time to think
about your resource, staffing and accommodation needs for the next year. The planning stage
shouldn’t be a one-step process. It’s important to model a range of income and cost scenarios
based on your most important data. To be as accurate as possible in your planning, consider data
such as:
7. Longer-term development plans in areas such as asset management, premises, staff and
IT/ICT
9. Ofsted reports
You can find more detailed guidance on the planning stage and the key areas for consideration
here.
Stage 3: Forecasting
Your three to five-year forecast should be more than your ‘best guess’ for it to be useful. Yet it’s
difficult to predict changes in areas such as funding, pupil numbers and the costs of staffing. It
can be beneficial to get involved in the local community to stay abreast of developments which
could impact your school. Being active within the wider education sector can also give you
insight into factors most likely to affect you. You can use this knowledge and your historical data
to model a range of income/cost scenarios to assess the impact of varying factors on the budget.
Factors to consider include:
Curriculum changes
Inflation
Multi-Academy Trusts (MATs) follow these same principles however there are a few more
considerations – you can learn more about them in the quick guide to school budget planning.
Once the budget gets approval from the governing body the budget is implemented, and
monitoring and evaluation should begin. Monitoring and reviewing your budget monthly will
highlight areas of potential risk early enough to act. It also makes life easier when it comes to
submitting budget monitoring returns to the DfE.
While evaluation is the final stage of the school budgeting process, it feeds back into the first
stage. Ongoing evaluation gives you a head start on the following year’s review and helps inform
forecasting. By keeping a close eye on the budget throughout the year, you can identify ways in
which resource and budget could be used more efficiently or differently. For example, where
there is recurrent underspend meaning money could be shifted to other resources in the future.
In realization of the urgent need to implement every aspect of educational policies which could
be distributional policies, curriculum policies, and pedagogical policies or resources policies
makes funding imperative. The school budget may be described as the process of preparing a
statement of anticipated revenue and the proposed expenditure over a period of time. In other
words, it is a process of preparing a summary of the programmes in the school that will be
reflected by the expected revenue. According to Griffin (1990), school budgeting as the
preparation of school budget (financial plan) indicates the total and composition of all
expenditures and the sources from which all the intended expenditures are expected to be
financed in the course of the year. Corroborating this view Okunamiri in Akinsolu (2008),
describes school budgets as plans outlined for financing the education/ school system for a given
period aimed at translating objectives into reality. As such, it is the laid down management plans
in respect of the economic resources to be used and the utilities to be produce.
Furthermore, Lacey (1989) and Adeogun (2004) noted that budgeting decision making process
takes the steps of;
a) Determination of overall levels of spending;
b) Allocation of estimated available resources among sectors;
c) Responses to budget circular;
d) Preparation of draft budget document;
e) Approval of draft budget;
f) Preparation of final budget;
g) Consideration by the legislature (or similar body);
h) Release of fund;
i) Implementation of capital expenditure;
j) Procurement;
k) Monitoring and evaluation;
l) Cash management.
When these steps are properly considered, then the budgetary process would be found to be most
effective in promoting the development of adequate educational programmes.
Evaluate performance and make adjustments; Programme and financial performance should be
continually evaluated and adjustments made to encourage progress towards achieved goals.
Poor funding
Misappropriation of funds
The after-effects of the aforementioned points are not just on the teachers, both the government
and the students suffer from it. When the education sector is not well funded, the teachers are not
motivated to discharge their duties effectively, and this will tell from the performance of the
students; as they will not be well equipped to compete with their counterparts in other countries.
This draws to mind why Nigeria still produces half-baked graduates annually.
However, the government is not left out as the growth of the country is threatened if the
education sector is not well funded. It will affect GDP, and even discourage foreign investors.
Also, the government will lose in that, a country without sound education system stands the
chance of being ride by other countries with vibrant educational system.
EFFICIENCY: Is the (often measurable) ability to avoid wasting materials, energy, efforts,
money, and time in doing something or in producing a desired result. In a more general sense, it
is the ability to do things well, successfully, and without waste
GDP (GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT): This is the broadest quantitative measure of a nation's
total economic activity. More specifically, GDP represents the monetary value of all goods and
services produced within a nation's geographic borders over a specified period of time.
Budgeting is important aspects that have and should be used in every activity. Some of these
importance include;
a) Budgeting helps to ensure that we have correct estimates of revenue and expenditure.
b) Budgeting help us to spend as budgeted, that is, expenditure will be as per the budget.
d) Budgeting forms the basis of accounting and therefore institutions become more efficient.
f) Budgeting helps to determine the quality and quantity of services in the institution or in
an organization.
g) The budget itself confers authority to administrators or head teachers to collect and to
spend money appropriately and effectively.
h) The budget ensures economic use of resources and for the appropriate projects that are
needful to be funded.
i) Budgeting helps education institutions to achieve the purpose expected by the society.
k) A budget also forms the basis of future budgets. The plan of a budget will help to
formulate and plan for the future budgets.
l) The budget will help in coordinating different units and departments towards general
goals of the school.
A well-prepared budget should consist of three key components namely: revenue plan,
expenditure framework and educational strategy which is a long term plan.
Budgeting ensures that actions are carried out according to a budget plan. When the school uses
a budget this ensures that programs are implemented according to set plans and objectives.
A budget ensures the achievement of the school’s objectives- the plans that required the spending
of money is taken care of by the budget.
The budget compels persons to plan- the principal has to ensure that they plan in order to spend
from the budget.
Budgeting motivates employees to improve on the performance- responsible persons will ensure
that books are up to date to reflect both revenue and expenditure. On the other hand, the principal
will ensure that the best measure is put in place to collect money such as school fee and book
rental fee. This money is usually included in the projected revenue.
References
Abdulkareem, A. Y., & Umar, I. O. (1997). Follow-up Study on Primary education Cost,
financing and management in Kogi, Kwaraand Niger States and Federal Capital
Territory. National primary Education Commission Project.
Adewala, T. M., Ajayi, K. O., & Enlkanoselu, O. A. (2006). Trends in the Federal Government
Financing Education in Nigeria. Journal of Revitalization of Higher Education, 3(5), 45-
58.
Arnaghyonyeodiwe, L. A., & Osinubi, T. S. (2006). The Nigerian Educational System and
returns to Education. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative
Studies, 3(1), 31-39.
Babatola, J. B., Wibele, A. I., & Suleiman, A. A. (2000). Education as aided by the World Bank:
A critical analysis of post-independence projects in Nigeria. Journal of Third world
studies, 17(1), 155-163.
Britain-Nigeria Education Trust. (2009). Nigeria Digest. Available on
[email protected].
Bulurni, D. (2012). Finance of Education in Nigeria. Paper Presented at the Forum on Cost and
Finance of Education in Nigeria, Abuja.
Ekundayo, T. A. (2008). Expanding Access to Higher Education In Nigeria, The Question of
Quality Control. Journal of Reforming Higher Education in Africa, 12-36.
Federal Government of Nigeria. (1997-2002). Annual Budgets.
FGN/UNESCO/UNDP. (2003). A Decade of Basic Education data in Nigeria (1988-1998).
FME. (2003). Historical Background on the Development of Education in Nigeria. In Education
Sector Status Analysis. Published with support from UNESCO/JAPAN TRUST FUND
PROJECT 532/NIR 1010.
Hinchliffe, K. (2002). Public Expenditure on Education in Nigeria. In Issues, estimates and some
implication. Washington D.C: World Bank.
Isa. (2013). Why ASUU is on Strike. In The Guardian. No. 29 No. 12621. Retrieved from
http://www.ngrguardiannews.com
Nwosu, E. (2009). ETF and Funding of Tertiary Education in Nigeria. Available on cdn-
[email protected].
Odebiyo, A. I., & Aina, O. (1999). Alternative modes of financing higher education in Nigeria
and implications of university governance. Accra: Association of African universities
(AAU).
Ogunlade, A. L. (1989). Locating supplemental sources of revenue to finance universities in
Nigeria. Journal of Education Finance, 14(4), 522-533.
The Vanguard. (n.d.). 25(61920), 43-44. Retrieved from http://www.vanguardngr.com
The World Bank. (2015). Retrieved from
http://www.thrglobaleconomy.com/rankings/Government
Ubogu, R. (2011). Financing Higher education in Nigeria. Journal of Research in Education and
Society, 2(1), 36-45.