SLA Group 2
SLA Group 2
SLA Group 2
Acquisition
Challenges
In an attempt to broaden the base of behavioral theory, some psychologists
proposed modified theoretical positions. One of these positions was mediation
theory, ( Osgood, 1953 , 1957) in which meaning was accounted for by the claim
that the linguistic stimulus (a word or sentence) elicits a “mediating” response that
is covert and invisible, acting within the learner.
Mediation theories were criticized on several fronts. There was too much
“mentalism” (speculating about unobservable behavior) involved for some, and
others saw a little relationship between meaning and utterance.
Theories of First Language Acquisition
The Nativist Approach
The nativist approach suggests that we are born with a specific language-
learning area in our brains.
Challenges
Critics to the nativist theory of language acquisition suggest that language is
learned from its environment and isn't innate. Another condition to the nativist
hypothesis is that not all languages abide by the same rules and constraints and
therefore question whether a universal grammar is possible
Theories of First Language Acquisition
Functional Approaches
A functional approach looks at how language enables us to do things: to share
information, to enquire, to express attitudes, to entertain, to argue, to get our
needs met, to reflect, to construct ideas, to order our experiences, and make
sense of the world.
Cognition and Language Development
Jean Piaget (1955; Piaget & Inhelder, 1969 ) described overall development as
the result of children’s interaction with their environment. Bloom (1976, p. 37 )
likewise noted that “what children know will determine what they learn about
the code for both speaking and understanding messages.”
Social Interaction and Language Development
Holzman (1984), Berko-Gleason, (1988), and Lock (1991) all looked at the
interaction between the child’s language acquisition and the learning of how
social systems operate in human behavior.
Issues in First
Language Acquisition
1. Competence and Performance
Competence
Is one's underlyong knowledge of the system of
a language-its rules of grammar, its
vocabulary, all the pieces of a language and Perfor
how those pieces fit together.
mance
Performence
Is the actual production (speaking, writing) or
the comprehention (listerning, reading) of
Compe
linguistics events.
tence
2. Comprehension and Production
In child language, most observational and
research evidence points to the general
superiority of comprehention over production:
1. Total
2. The Natural
Physical
Approach
Response
Total Physical Response
The founder of the Total Physical Response (TPR) method, James Asher
(1977), noted that children, in learning their first language, appear to do
a lot of listening before they speak, and that their listening is
accompanied by physical responses (reaching, grabbing, moving,
looking, and so forth).
A typical TPR class utilized the imperative mood, even at more advanced
proficiency levels.
Eventually students, one by one, presumably felt comfortable enough to
venture verbal responses to questions, then to ask questions themselves,
and the process continued.
TPR had its limitations. It was especially effective in the beginning levels
of language proficiency, but lost its distinctiveness as learners advanced
in their competence.
But today TPR is used more as a type of classroom activity, which is a
more useful way to view it.
The Natural Approach
The Natural Approach simulated child language acquisition through the
use of TPR activities at the beginning level.
Everyday language situations were highlighted: shopping, home and
health topics, etc. But in advocating teacherdelivered
“comprehensible input” (spoken language that is understandable to the
learner or just a little beyond the learner’s level), this method departed
from strictly drawing insights from children’s “natural” acquisition.
Richards & Rodgers (2001) noted that the delay of oral production
can be pushed too far and that at an early stage it is important for the
teacher to step in and encourage students to talk.
Thank You !
Any Questions?