Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: JOSE S. DAYOT IV Name of Rater: YOLLY B. VINGNO

Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER I
School: BACOLOD CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: SEPTEMBER 7, 2021
Rating Period: S.Y. 2021-2022

Key Performance Actual Result Equivalent Weight Score Total Score Highest score that can be claimed
Indicator (Refer to the attached (Equivalent x Weight) by the Ratee in each Performance
RUBRIC) Indicator under each KRA
(Refer to the attached RUBRIC)
Academic Performance 50%

Dropout Rate 50%

KRAs Outputs Objectives Weight per Performance Indicators Rating Score*

Objective (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) (Refer to the (Rating x
attached RUBRIC) Weight)
KRA 1: Content Main MOV-Classroom 1. Applied knowledge of Refer to Scoring Guide 4 0.32
Knowledge and Observation content within and across 8%
Pedagogy Tool (COT) rating sheet curriculum teaching areas

• Learning Activity Sheets 2. Ensured the positive Scoring Guide for the LASs which were made 5 0.4
made by the ratee intended use of ICT to facilitate the by the ratee, used in the lesson delivery and
to modify the content, teaching and learning 8% were presented as his/her MOVs:
presentation or learning process • 4 or more MOVs -5 pts
activities included in a • 3 MOVs-4 pts
particular page or section in • 2 MOVs-3 pts
the Deped-Developed SLMs • 1 MOVs-2pts
 • Documentation of the • No MOV-1 pt
provided appropriate
additional learning resources
to learners other than the
DepEd-Developed SLMs and
the Teacher-made learning
activity Sheets (examples:
coloring materials, tablets,
cartolina and the like)
• Teacher used personal
resources like laptop, printer
and other ICT-based learning
materials.
• Screenshot of any query
related to Teaching-Learning
Process
• Copy of printed of LWHLP,
WHLP, ITTP
• Others with annotation
Main MOV -Classroom 3. Applied a range of 4 0.32
Observation Teaching strategies to
Tool (COT) rating sheet Develop critical and 8% Refer to Scoring Guide
Creative thinking, as
well as other Higher-Order
thinking skills
KRA 2: Diversity Ratee prepared any 4. Established a learner 4 0.32
of Learners & supplementary material (in centered culture by using 8%
Assessment and print/digital format) DLP, teaching strategies that Refer to Scoring Guide
Reporting Assessment Plan, Video/Audio respond to their linguistic,
Lesson to be used in the lesson cultural, socioeconomic and
delivery that highlights the religious backgrounds
following:
• Teaching strategies that are
responsive to learners’
 linguistic, cultural, socio-
economic, or religious
backgrounds.

• Documentation of strategies 5. Planned and delivered Within the rating period: 4 0.32
e.g. receipt of SLMs/ LASs teaching strategies that are 100% of learners have accomplished to
distribution/retrieval responsive to the special SLMs or LASs -5 pts
adopted to ensure 100% of educational needs of learners 91%-99% of learners have accomplished to
the learners have access to in difficult circumstances*, SLMs or LASs -4 pts
DepEd developed SLMs including: geographic 81% - 90% of learners have accomplished to
and/or Learning Activity isolation; chronic illness; 8% SLMs or LASs- 3 pts
Sheets made by the ratee. displacement due to armed 71%-80% of learners have accomplished to
• Copy of a monitoring forms conflict, urban resettlement SLMs or LASs- 2 pts
or an equivalent tool that the or disasters; child abuse and Below 71% of learners have accomplished
school or the rater uses to child labor practices to SLMs or LASs- 1 pt.
ensure that the teacher finds
ways for the learners to have Scoring Guide if the other possible MOVs
access to the DepEd- are used:
developed SLMs and/or 5 other possible MOVs – 5pts
Learning Activity Sheet made 4 other possible MOVs - 4 pts
by the ratee. 3 other possible MOVs – 3 pts
• Accomplished anecdotal 2 other possible MOVs – 2 pts
record of learners under 1 possible MOVs – 1 pt.
difficult circumstances or
Individual Learners
Monitoring Progress Form
(ILMPF).
• Documentation of
monitoring the tuning in of
learners to RBI Episodes
• Documentation of the
utilized two-way radio or any
available communication
platforms to deliver the
contents of DepEd-
developed SLMs and/or LAS
 made by the ratee.
• Evidence of sent/received
soft copies of SLMs/LASs
• Other equivalent MOVs as
may be agreed upon by the
rater and the rate approved
by the SH
Evidence that highlights 6. Used strategies for 8% Quality: 4 0.32
providing accurate and providing timely, accurate and • Provided learners with accurate, and
constructive feedback to constructive feedback to specific and directed constructive feedback
improve learner performance improve learner performance as shown in the evidence submitted – 5 pts
and that shows timeliness of • Provided learners with accurate, and
feedback given to any of the specific constructive feedback as shown in
following: the evidence
• activity sheet Submitted-4 pts
• performance task • Provided learners with accurate, and
• quiz or test general constructive feedback as shown in
• self-learning module the evidence submitted-3 pts
• Provided learners with inaccurate and/or
destructive feedback as shown in the
evidence submitted -2 pts
• No evidence was shown-1 pt
Timeliness:
• MOV submitted shows feedback given
within 5 working days from submission-5
pts
• MOV submitted shows feedback given
within 6-10 working days from submission-4
pts
• MOV submitted shows feedback given
within 11-20 working days from submission-
3 pts
• MOV submitted shows feedback given
beyond 20 working days from submission-2
 pts
• No evidence was shown-1 pt
KRA 3: Main MOV -Classroom 7. Selected, developed, 4 0.32
Curriculum and Observation organized and used
Planning Tool (COT) rating sheet appropriate teaching and 8% Refer to Scoring Guide
learning resources, including
ICT, to address learning goals
One lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, 8. Set achievable and Quality: 4 0.32
WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson appropriate learning
• All of the learning outcomes set are
Exemplars, and the likes) or outcomes that are aligned
one lesson from a self-learning with learning competencies aligned with the learning competencies as
module prepared by the ratee shown in the MOV submitted – 5 pts
with achievable and • Majority of the learning outcomes set are
appropriate learning outcomes aligned with the learning competencies as
that are aligned with the shown in the MOV submitted – 4 pts
learning competencies as • Half of the learning outcomes set are
shown in any of the following: 8% aligned with the learning competencies as
• Lecture/discussion shown in the MOV submitted - 3 pts
Activity/activity sheet • Less than half of the learning outcomes
• Performance task set are aligned with the learning
• Rubric for assessing competencies as shown in the MOV
performance using submitted – 2 pts
• No acceptable evidence was shown – 1 pt
criteria that
appropriately describe
the target output
KRA 4: MOV No.1: 9. Built relationships with Quality: 5 0.4
Community *Directory of parents parents/ guardians and the • Sustained engagement with parents/
Linkages and *Documentation of Home wider school community to guardians and/or wider school
Professional visitation facilitate involvement in the 8% community to facilitate involvement in
Engagement & *Group chat with parents educative process the educative process as evidenced by 2
Personal Growth *Letters/Messages notifying or more of MOV No. 1 or 2 – 5 pts
and Professional parents on school related
• Secured collaboration with
Development concerns.
parents/guardians and/or wider school
MOV No.2:
*Documentation of parent- community to facilitate involvement in
teacher dialogue/ conference the educative process as evidenced by
*Advocacy/ mechanisms one MOV no. 1 or 2-4 pts
conducted (campaign for • Communicated with and obtained
enrolment/ early enrolment, response from parents/guardians
learning modality) and/or wider school community to
*weekly/bi-monthly report on facilitate involvement in the educative
distribution of SLMs/LAS and
process as evidenced by MOV No. 3-3
retrieval of outputs/
pts
performance products
MOV No.3: • Communicated with parents/guardians
*Summary of Deworming and and/or wider school community to
WIFA – submitted facilitate involvement in the educative
*Created exclusive Facebook process but received no response/reply
group chat/page with students as evidenced by MOV No. 3-2 pts
• No acceptable evidence was Shown -1
pt
Efficiency:
• Submitted any 4 of the acceptable MOV
No. 1 or 2-5 pts
• Submitted any 3 of the acceptable MOV
No. 1 or 2-4 pts
• Submitted any 2 of the acceptable MOV
No. 3-3 pts
• Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOV
No. 3-2 pts
• No acceptable evidence was shown-1 pt
• Certificate of completion in a 10. Participated in Quality: 5 0.4
course/training professional networks to • Participated in any professional
• Certificate of participation in share knowledge and to network/activity that requires output and
a webinar, retooling, enhance practice 8% proof of implementation within the
upskilling, and other training/ school to share knowledge and to
seminar/ workshop with enhance practice as evidenced by the
proof of implementation submitted MOV – 5 pts
• Certificate of recognition/ • Participated in any professional
speakership in a webinar, network/activity that requires output and
 retooling, upskilling, and proof of implementation within the
other training/ seminar/ department/ grade level to share
workshop knowledge and to enhance practice as
• Any proof of participation to evidenced by the submitted - 4 pts
a benchmarking activity • MOV Participated in any professional
• Any proof of participation in network/activity that requires output to
school LAC sessions share knowledge and to enhance practice
(online/face-to-face) certified as evidenced by the submitted – 3 pts
by the LAC Coordinator • MOV Participated in any professional
• Mentoring/ coaching/ network/activity that does not require
journal/ LDM 2 output to share knowledge and to
• Others (please specify and enhance practice as evidenced by the
provide annotations) submitted – 2 pts
• MOV No acceptable evidence was shown
– 1 pt
Efficiency:
• Submitted 4 different kinds of acceptable
MOV – 5 pts
• Submitted 3 different kinds of acceptable
MOV – 4 pts
• Submitted 2 different kinds of acceptable
MOV – 3 pts
• Submitted any 1 of the acceptable – 2 pts
• MOV No acceptable evidence was shown
– 1 pt
Main MOV: Individual 11. Developed a personal Quality 4 0.32
Performance and Commitment improvement plan based on • Updated the Development Plan and
Review Form Development reflection of one’s practice approved by the rater during Phase II of
Plan (IPCRF-DP) Supporting and ongoing professional 8% the RPMS cycle – 5 pts
MOV: Any document aligned learning • Discussed progress on the Development
with the IPCRF-DP such as Plan with the rater to check whether
• Reflection of one’s practice Development Needs were addressed – 4
during LAC session/s with pts
proof of attendance • Accomplished the Development Plan
 • Reflection/Personal Notes on from learning objectives up to resources
Coaching and Mentoring needed to address Development Needs
and/or Midyear Review during Phase I of the RPMS cycle – 3 pts
• Personal notes journal on • Accomplished the Strengths and
division/school-led INSET with Development Needs portion of the
proof of attendance Development Plan after self-assessment
• Certificate of enrolment/ at the beginning of the school year – 2
registration form/class card in pts
graduate/postgraduate • No acceptable evidence was shown – 1 pt
school/online courses Efficiency
• Any learning material • Submitted the IPCRF-DP with any 4 of the
highlighting the improvement acceptable Supporting MOV – 5 pts
done based on accomplished • Submitted the IPCRF-DP with any 3 of the
“reflection” section acceptable Supporting MOV – 4 pts
• Others (Please specify and • Submitted the IPCRF-DP with any 2 of the
provide annotations) acceptable Supporting MOV – 3 pts
• Submitted the IPCRF-DP with any 1 of the
acceptable Supporting MOV – 2 pts
• No acceptable evidence was shown – 1
pt

KRA 5: Plus Proof of: 12. Performed various related Quality: 5 0.4
Factor • committee involvement works/activities that • Performed at least 1 related work/activity
• advisorship of co-curricular contribute to the teaching- that contributed to the teaching-learning
activities learning process 12% process beyond the school/ Community
• involvement as Learning Center (CLC) as evidenced by
module/learning material submitted MOV – 5 pts
writer • Performed at least 1 related work/activity
• involvement as that contributed to the teaching-learning
module/learning material process within the school/ Community
validator Learning Center (CLC) as evidenced by
• participation in the submitted MOV – 4 pts
RO/SDO/school-initiated TV- • Performed at least 1 related work/activity
/radio-based instruction that contributed to the teaching-learning
• book or journal process within the learning area/
 authorship/contributorship department as evidenced by submitted
• coordinatorship/ MOV – 3 pts
chairpersonship • Performed at least 1 related work/activity
• coaching and mentoring that contributed to the teaching-learning
learners in competitions process within the class as evidenced by
• mentoring pre-service submitted MOV – 2 pts
teachers • No acceptable evidence was shown – 1 pt
• participation in
demonstration teaching Efficiency:
• participation as research • Submitted any 4 of the acceptable MOV –
presenter in a forum/ 5 pts
conference • Submitted any 3 of the acceptable MOV –
• Speaker/facilitator in 4 pts
trainings / SLAC /lecture- • Submitted any 2 of the acceptable MOV –
demo and other forum 3 pts
• others (please specify and • Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOV –
provide annotations) 2 pts
• No acceptable evidence was shown – 1 pt

5.Plus Factor (not to exceed 1 point)

Assignments eligible for Plus Factor Point

Overall Rating 4.16

I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of me as a Teacher and We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected herein is product of a careful
willingly commit to implement what have been stipulated and agreed upon in this appraisal of the evidences to support each rating and a thorough deliberation between the
document to the best of my ability. Ratee and the Rater.

___ JOSE S. DAYOT IV Ratee: Rater:

Teacher __________________ _____________________________
Teacher Master Teacher/Head Teacher

Witness:
Approving Authority:

YOLLY B. VINGNO Conformed:

Master Teacher/Head Teacher _______________________________ __________________________________
Date: ____SEPTEMBER 7, 2021_____ School Head SDS/ASDS
Date: __________________________ Date: ____________________________