Spearmans Corr
Spearmans Corr
same.
The Spearman’s rank-order tests determines the strength and direction of the
monotonic relationship between two variables measured at ordinal, interval or ratio
level. As with the Pearson equivalent, the test will yield a figure of between -1 and +1,
and the closer the figure is to 1, the stronger the monotonic relationship. As a rule of
thumb, you can use the following figures to determine the effect size:
A Spearman’s correlation coefficient of between 0.4 and 0.6 (or -.04 and -.06)
indicates a moderate strength monotonic relationship between the two variables
1. In the first instance, you should create a table from your data. Each set of
measurements should be ranked by assigning the ranking 1 to the largest
number in a column, 2 to the next largest value, 3 to the third largest and so on
(tied scores can be assigned the mean rank).
1. Then, find the difference in the ranks (d). This is the difference between the
ranks of the two values on each row, calculated by subtracting the ranking of
the second value (in this example, price) from the rank of the first (concept
evaluation).
In our example, we would first multiply the sum of the d 2 values (6) by 6 (i.e. 36). To
address the denominator, we would raise the number of observations (concepts) to the
power of 3 and then subtract the number of observations (i.e. 4 3-4 = 60). We can then
calculate Spearman’s rho as 1-36/60= -.058.
The types of research questions that can be addressed through the Spearman
correlation method are similar to those addressable through a Pearson analysis.
Remember, however, that the main difference is that data can be ordinal in nature, and
the relationship should be monotonic. For example, you could use the Spearman
correlation coefficient to answer questions like:
Is
there a statistically significant relationship between participants’ level of
education and their starting salary?