Reaction Paper The Life of Prophet Muhammad (S.W.A.)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY

MAIN CAMPUS

REACTION PAPER
THE LIFE OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD {S.A.W.]

IBN JARDIN P. SAMAD


DAT – CROP PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY
PROF. ARDIN JUMAMOY ODOY
OCTOBER 15, 2022
IBN JARDIN P. SAMAD
PROFESSOR ODOY
HIS003 – Pp
0ct 15, 2022

Reaction Paper
The life of Prophet Muhammad {S.A.W.}

In preparation for the film, I watched "The Life of Muhammad: A BBC Documentary" on
YouTube; in the film itself, we learned about the life and times of the Prophet Muhammad
(S.A.W.). Rageh Omaar explores the Arabia Muhammad was born into, a world of tribal
loyalties and polytheistic faith, in a literal and historical voyage that begins in Muhammad's
birthplace of Mecca. This series is a first for British television, chronicling the life of
Muhammad, who for the billion and a half Muslims around the world is the messenger and final
prophet of Allah S.W.T. Drawing on the knowledge and commentary of some of the world's
leading academics and commentators on Islam, the program explores Muhammad's first
marriage to Khadijah and how he received the first of the revelations that had such a profound
effect on his life and the lives of those closest to him.

The series' setting is fascinating in its own right, even if you don't find the story particularly
interesting. Time period spanning many years. I asked BBC executives like Mark Thompson,
Aaqil Ahmed, and Danny Cohen, the controller of BBC One, when they planned to air a series
like this. There has been a lot of nagging, but it has finally paid off! It actually happened. Even
before the first episode has aired, the show and the country have offended viewers. More
backlash is to be expected in the years to come, especially from secularists.

On the other hand, the series contains more engaging elements. The BBC notes that, "in keeping
with Islamic tradition," the film does not show Muhammad's face or include "dramatic
reconstructions" of his life. The documentary's treatment of Aisha, who may have been as young
as nine when she was married to Muhammad, is also unknown. In a speech delivered in 2008 at
Westminster Cathedral, Mark Thompson claimed that the two religions were portrayed
differently on television. In the first episode, we learn about Muhammad's childhood and the
culture in which he was raised. Rageh acts like a manly foreign correspondent by praying,
brooding, and scaling rocks. As a result, he claims, there is "no shrine, no plaque to record the
spot of his birth," because Muslims distinguish between the message and the messenger.
Muslims "follow the messenger rather than adore him," but the film constantly reminds
viewers—especially Rageh, who is overjoyed by Muhammad—of the prophet's significance in
the lives of Muslims everywhere. He seemed to gloss over these claims during the subsequent
question and answer.

In conclusion, I've already mentioned that the film doesn't avoid controversial topics, but it also
doesn't get bogged down in the details. I'll provide some examples for you to paraphrase. Since
Muhammad was illiterate, Muslims believe that God revealed the words of the Qur'an to him
rather than coming from his own head. The apocalyptic aftermath of Rushdie's novel is
discussed, as is an episode in which a purportedly heavenly revelation embracing pagan gods
was later deleted because it was intended as a test. Both scenarios cast doubt on the veracity of
the Qur'an as a divine revelation and Muhammad's role as a prophet, if not the prophet himself.
The show does not depict Muhammad's likeness or present any dramatic recreations of
Muhammad's life, as these are forbidden by Islamic law.

You might also like